Go back

Voters must realize that TransLink is not on the transit plebiscite

Image Credit: Talha Qadir
Image Credit: Talha Qadir

As you are probably already aware, the transportation funding plebiscite is fast approaching and both sides of the debate are actively trying to win your vote. The ‘no’ side, championed by the Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation (CTF), has arguably been the more vocal side, but it is important to consider what they have to say with a healthy dose of skepticism. 

There is one point in particular that the CTF has decided to dwell on: the question of TransLink, its management, and perceived waste. The ‘no’ side wants you to believe that a ‘no’ vote on this plebiscite will send a message to the provincial leaders that you are unhappy with TransLink, as a company, and want to see a change in their leadership or structure.

It will not.

The purpose of this plebiscite is very clear, and the voting options are very simple. We have the opportunity to approve or disapprove of a new funding source for regional transportation projects — specifically, the projects outlined in the Mayors’ Council Plan. The vote is a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no.’ If you agree that the projects will benefit the region and agree with the funding proposal, then vote ‘yes.’  If you’re absolutely sure that you don’t agree with the funding source, then you should probably vote ‘no.’

The CTF and their cronies have attempted to hijack this vote.

In no way, shape, or form is this vote about TransLink’s governance structure, management, or responsibilities. After all, the provincial government leaders aren’t mind readers, and despite what the CTF would like you to think, there simply isn’t a way a ‘no’ vote can be interpreted as a ‘yes to transit, but no to TransLink.’  It’s a completely ludicrous idea; you can bet your bottom dollar that a ‘no’ vote will be interpreted as a big fat no to transportation projects. 

The CTF and their cronies have attempted to hijack this vote and deflect public debate onto the agency in charge, instead of the real debate on the projects and their funding source.

Still unsure of how you’re going to vote? Here are few more facts to persuade you: once this funding source is secured, it is guaranteed (or as close to guaranteed as you can get) to be spent on transportation projects. 

It really is a damn good deal.  For a small 0.5 per cent increase in the PST, our fair city will get more than 30 kilometres of new rapid rail transit, a 25 per cent increase in bus service, 2,700 kilometres of bikeways, and a new Pattullo bridge.

That’s not much for what will certainly be a world-class transportation system, which our region desperately needs. The nice thing about this plan is that it offers something for literally every region within Metro Vancouver, and for all transportation modes. Everyone will benefit, whether they take transit or not.

So in the next month or two, get registered to vote, make sure you do your research about the projects and funding source, and finally: vote! Just remember what you are actually voting for.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...

Read Next

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...
Picked For You

Today’s Top Picks,

For You

photo of Skytrain expo line

TransLink’s fare enforcement blitz is a terrible idea

By: Yagya Parihar, SFU Student In my lifetime of using public transit, I only remember having been fare checked three times. All three times were in BC while exiting SkyTrain stations in late 2024. I tapped my pass on the fare gate, and the transit cop asked to see my…

This is a photo of an empty SUB hallway that features the “SFSS Admin Offices” room. Next to the room is a big bulletin board with about 30 neatly lined-up posters and a big red number 3 to indicate the level of the SUB.

Five SFSS full-time union staff receive layoff notices

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer and Hannah Fraser, News Editor The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) has initiated staff layoffs, with five out of eight full-time union positions affected as of July 25. All the positions either support student activities or the SFSS’ operations, and do not include SFSS executives.…

This is a photo of the SFU Surrey Engineering Building from the inside. There are numerous levels to the building, artificial trees, and a wide staircase in the photo.

TSSU speaks on latest updates to IP policy

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer As recently reported by The Peak, the Senate reviewed and discussed a new draft version of its intellectual property (IP) policy solely focused on the commercialization of inventions and software. Based on community feedback, they split the IP policy into two: one for inventions and…

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...