Go back

Are in-person workplaces our best option?

By: Victor Tran, SFU Student

COVID-19 brought new difficulties to our workforce, while also presenting an opportunity to transform society for the better. One of those opportunities is the emergence of a flexible working mode: work from home (WFH). Though some might argue that an in-person setting fosters greater productivity, research says otherwise. 

Before COVID-19, in-person work was the industry standard. According to Forbes Insights, eight out of ten executives prefer face-to-face meetings for three main reasons: more rapport development, better comprehension of body language and facial expressions, and more interpersonal interactions. Studies have shown an in-person workplace allows for better relationship establishment due to a few biological reactions: emotional contagion and mirror neurons. These reactions allow us to feel others’ feelings by being in close proximity, which accounts for better relationship establishment. According to Harvard Business Review, a face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. In-person workplaces can result in better persuasion as workers transmit spoken and non-verbal information more effectively.

All these benefits sound great — however, they are not always necessary in every business scenario. According to a McKinsey study on 2,000 activities in over 800 occupations, some tasks that can fully take advantage of an in-person workplace include jobs like teaching, counselling, and coaching, among others. Yet, tasks like updating knowledge and learning, interacting with computers, creativity, and information processing can be done remotely with little to no productivity loss. In-person workplaces are not necessarily the best settings for all business tasks. Furthermore, forcing onsite work limits flexibility for workers, many of whom might have unique circumstances such as caring for children or managing disabilities that impact their ability to consistently work in-person. This can drive productivity down further and increase business costs — both of which can be easily avoided by adopting remote working.

Remote work settings offer great benefits to both employees and business owners. WFH allows employees to adjust their work schedules, resulting in better task prioritization and productivity. A Harvard University study revealed that while remote work rose during the pandemic, employees spent 12% less time in large meetings and 9% more time on external tasks such as interacting with customers. Prodo — a leader in employee monitoring software solutions — confirmed that employee productivity increased by 47% each year. Researchers measured an increase in activities like telephone calls and email responses throughout the pandemic, highlighting that a physical office isn’t necessary for many tasks. 

The flexibility of WFH leads to better job satisfaction. 80% of workers from one US study agreed that WFH helps them manage a work-life balance as they have more time for themselves and their families in a comfortable environment. Higher worker satisfaction will reduce businesses’ job turnover rates and absenteeism while increasing efficiency. During the pandemic, 95% of employers who adopted WFH models saw a positive impact on employee retention, while 75% of teleworkers were less likely to resign. 

Although an in-person workplace offers strong team building and persuasive advantages, not all business tasks benefit from these characteristics. Meanwhile, WFH presents itself as the next transformative tool of the business world, having the potential to increase employee satisfaction, accessibility, and productivity while cutting costs. Businesses must realize the necessity of the WFH model and carefully consider tasks that can take full advantage of a remote working environment.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...

Read Next

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...
Picked For You

Today’s Top Picks,

For You

photo of Skytrain expo line

TransLink’s fare enforcement blitz is a terrible idea

By: Yagya Parihar, SFU Student In my lifetime of using public transit, I only remember having been fare checked three times. All three times were in BC while exiting SkyTrain stations in late 2024. I tapped my pass on the fare gate, and the transit cop asked to see my…

This is a photo of an empty SUB hallway that features the “SFSS Admin Offices” room. Next to the room is a big bulletin board with about 30 neatly lined-up posters and a big red number 3 to indicate the level of the SUB.

Five SFSS full-time union staff receive layoff notices

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer and Hannah Fraser, News Editor The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) has initiated staff layoffs, with five out of eight full-time union positions affected as of July 25. All the positions either support student activities or the SFSS’ operations, and do not include SFSS executives.…

This is a photo of the SFU Surrey Engineering Building from the inside. There are numerous levels to the building, artificial trees, and a wide staircase in the photo.

TSSU speaks on latest updates to IP policy

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer As recently reported by The Peak, the Senate reviewed and discussed a new draft version of its intellectual property (IP) policy solely focused on the commercialization of inventions and software. Based on community feedback, they split the IP policy into two: one for inventions and…

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...