Home Blog Page 1263

Coming out is exhausting

0

The decision to come out means an entire life of doing so

One of my favourite stories I like to share is my coming out story as a lesbian. It’s amusing to most people, but most of all it’s kind of hilarious while still being personal. It’s a way of expressing myself freely to the person I am interacting with without holding back by introducing who I really am on a personal level.

What is problematic is that even in our present culture, where marriage equality is slowly being achieved, there is still that fear of self-expression and the struggle of acceptance within the individual due to society’s perceptions of what is normal.

Coming out is already a hard process and it is a different experience for everyone who has come out and for those in the process of coming out. Though one might think this seems to be a one-time instance, the fact is that once you identify yourself to be out of the heteronormative binary, you are automatically signed up to  live a life where you will have to come out more than once.

Since we can’t all just wear a sign with our preferred identity labels, it becomes more of an exhaustive task for the need to come out and explain yourself in various occasions. First in the list: Family and friends. They are usually the first people to receive the news flash that you are gay.

I’m sorry to break it to you, dear friend, but the coming out process does not end with just these two groups. Even in simple daily life encounters like spending time in the workplace, going shopping for clothes or the quick trip to the doctor can become an uneasy or scary situation to disclose your orientation.

I once went to see a new doctor for my annual check-up and had to disclose that I am in a same-sex relationship. There was a moment where I almost felt not proud of who I am, which one should never feel! There is always a fear in the back of my mind that if this person does not like me, I may be harmed or get turned away from necessary health services.

Another time is when I went shopping for bow ties and dress shirts in the men’s section of H&M. I suddenly had to explain to the salesperson that I was buying dress shirts “for my brother” as I tried them on.

But the trickiest situation is the workplace. Sometimes it is hard to know if your work environment is safe enough to disclose that information, because your job could be on the line, as well as your personal safety. There is the possibility of getting bullied in the workplace if colleagues and employers find out about your sexual orientation.

In my experience, I tend to separate my career life and my personal life due to these unknown consequences and the fact that I don’t really have to. Being out for three years now, there is still uneasiness when I am out in the public with my partner, even in a queer-friendly city like Vancouver. There is the fear of being judged and harmed, which makes coming out more of a scary experience than feeling true to yourself.

I long for an ideal society where the process of coming out can be embraced as a simple discussion topic just like telling somebody of what your cultural heritage is or where you originally grew up.

SFU’s geek clubs embrace people for who they are

0

LARPing

Before hiding your geekiness forever, consider the Altered Reality Club

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by Flikr

I can’t begin to tell you how many times I’ve stumbled home on a Friday night, only to find my brother and his friends in their nigh on eighth or ninth hour of Dungeon Mastering. I can, however, say that not only have I had to tag in for an exhausted adventurer and assume the role of Orgrim Flamecrash or Dank the Well-Hung, I’ve actually enjoyed it.

Now, I don’t consider myself a geek. I wrestled all through high school, was captain of the soccer team, and played sports five days a week. However, this doesn’t mean I don’t like video games, Game of Thrones or even the occasional MMORPG. Heck, I even played World of Warcraft for a good while. There are many people who also enjoy these activities, many of whom don’t identify as geeks.

The truth is geek clubs aren’t just for geeks anymore. You don’t need to be lurking around
campus shouting, “Leeroooy Jenkiiins!” (I might be kind of a geek) while wearing your gold Triforce medallion to feel like you fit in. Nor should you feel ashamed if that is exactly what you’d like to be doing at this moment. What you should realize is that even though you might be hesitant about admitting you occasionally want to storm castles and defeat dragons, chances are there are many people who like the exact same things.

To find out just how common these interests are, try checking out the Altered Reality Club (ARC). Like many clubs at SFU, the ARC provides opportunities for students (and even some TAs) to meet new friends with similar interests. Such interests can range from tabletop gaming, to weekly screenings of Firefly, to playing werewolf at ARC’s various icebreakers and sleepovers. Even if there’s just one thing that you enjoy sharing with others, be it Simulators or Bleach or just a creative mind, that’s reason enough to be a part of the club.

In fact, the ARC could be bringing “geeks” and “non-geeks” together by making geeks emerge from their dark, brooding basements to socialize in the light of day, while giving non-geeks a less stigmatized venue in which to interact. I know when I was WoW’ing around, me and my Gnome Warlock, Rutabaga, (you heard me), were stuck on my family’s computer to interact with pixelated warriors; if I had been able to hang out with other normal kids who liked the same game, I think I would have felt a bit better about playing it.

That’s one thing I like about these social “geek” clubs: games like Dungeons&Dragons, unlike some video games, force you to flex your creative muscles and play with other people in person. It doesn’t hurt that, unlike when you get stuck in a video game at an impass or an impossible puzzle, you have the choice here to SMASH THAT PUZZLE AND BURN IT AND “SAY FUCK NO I AIN’T DOING THAT ,COME UP WITH A BETTER PLAN, DUNGEON MASTAH!”

By fading the line between geeks and non-geeks, clubs like the ARC are helping not just nerds, but everyone, to feel more comfortable in their own skin. Maybe it just takes a couple late-night D&D sessions to realise that these “geeky” games are things we could all potentially enjoy.

Convocating doesn’t seem worth its hefty price tag

2

With all the hidden fees, you’d think we could at least get financial sponsorship from Capital One

By Rachel Braeuer
Photos by Ben Buckley

A post-secondary education may be the ticket to higher earning potential, but not before your institution bleeds you dry.

After you’ve finished your last assignment, you think it’ll be all downhill — you feel as free as you did the first time you coasted down a hill on your bike after getting your training wheels off. Then you apply for convocation and realize that unless you’ve got over $100 just kickin’ it in the bank, you won’t be crossing any stage.

With the amount of student fees lumped together and tossed at us every September, you’d think the cost of convocation would be lumped into those. While it’s true not everyone will want to cross the stage and rent regalia, lack of use doesn’t stop SFU from charging a number of other fees.

Distance students still have to pay gym membership fees and U-Pass fees. Health insurance is compulsory, too, unless you opt out, and even then you pay upfront and get a refund. What makes convocation any different?

I haven’t looked into whether there is a rationale behind these fees, and frankly I don’t care to. Do they argue added administration fees? Added work for the registrar’s office? I could understand if this wasn’t a regular occurrence, but these ceremonies happen every year, twice a year, without fail.

Making students foot the bill because SFU employees have to do extra work twice a year that I’m assuming is outlined in their job descriptions is asinine. That’s like a clothing store charging a service fee one week a year while they do inventory because their employees have to put in extra hours. If it’s a regular element of doing business, it should be factored in from the beginning, not added to your bill as you walk out the door.

Why didn’t I plan for the cost of graduation, you ask? Shouldn’t I accept responsibility for my degree? Yes, I should. But SFU should also clearly provide me with this information. If you check the “apply to graduate” website, it tells you to check out the “deadlines and fees” website to find out more about applying to graduate.

The deadlines are clearly outlined, but the fees aren’t. These aren’t disclosed until you’re logged into SIS clutching your credit card and fighting back tears thinking about the balance you’re carrying. Only then do you discover the $30 they normally charge becomes $80 if you miss the deadline, for a total of $84.73 after tax.

“At least it’s over,” you think, scouring your webmail for invitations to paid linguistic and psychology studies, contemplating checking Craigslist to see how much people will pay to kiss your feet while factoring in the cost of a pedicure. But then you receive an e-mail informing you the regalia rental cost is $30 ($157 if you want to buy the robes — “virgin for life” bumper stickers are extra, though).

What is this crap? Are graduands also secretly signed up for convocation fight club, where the first rule is you don’t talk about the fees associated with convocation fight club?

Assuming your degree takes you four years to complete, and you attend all three semesters a year, you pay student fees 12 times while going to university. If the cost of convocation is $60, SFU could charge you $5 a semester and not put you deeper in the hole at the end of your debt-gree.

Don’t want to convocate? We should put those funds in a pool for people who need the financial assistance, so everyone who wants to convocate can, just like any other “maybe you’ll use it, maybe you won’t, but pay for it anyway” fee we incur.

Drone technology does more harm than good

0

BW-Drone-Courtesy of the US Air Force-Wikimedia Commons

Creating distrust and hostility in civilian populations

By Harleen Khangura
Photos by Wikimedia Commons

President Obama’s National Defence speech on May 23 has sparked a greater interest and debate on US facilitated drone attacks aimed towards eliminating high-ranking terrorists in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen.

According to the New America Foundation, American drones have killed 55 known Al-Qaeda leaders or affiliates in Pakistan since the advent of their use in 2004. In other words, this technology has apparently successfully hindered many terror plots that could have catastrophic for the United States — possibly even Canada — with relative ease and low cost in comparison to conventional military options.

However, the use of drones has a major drawback: they result in civilian casualties often crudely referred to as “collateral damage.” In Pakistan, the civilian and unknown casualty rate was about 11 per cent in 2012, while the civilian casualty rate over the course of drone usage in Yemen has been between 3.2 to 8.9 per cent.

Arguably, the rates are lower in comparison to the countless civilian fatalities that may have resulted had Al-Qaeda or Taliban leaders been left to their designs. But the loss of innocent lives in countries targeted by drones has serious repercussions, specifically the radicalization of civilians, which cannot be overlooked.

Since the beginning of their use, drone attacks have alienated civilians in Pakistan against the American government. About 60 per cent of those polled in Pakistan’s tribal regions — the main target area for drones — have expressed support for suicide attacks against the US military. More people, especially relatives of victims, are joining militant groups; when terrorists are targeted by drones and civilian life is lost, it inspires individuals to join terrorism.

This is true about home-grown terror as well. We’ve seen the terror suspects of recent attacks in Boston and London cite US wars in the Middle East or attacks on Muslim lands as impetuses for their extremist acts.

These individuals maintain the questionable perception that US military operations, including drones, as an indication of American hostility towards their countries or religion. This perception is further exacerbated by the discrepancy in civilian casualty numbers claimed by US government officials and those circulated by news reports or local civilians, fuelling feelings of mistrust and hostility towards the US.

However, civilian hostility in Pakistan or Yemen is not directed solely at the US government. Many, if not most, Pakistani and Yemeni civilians are aggravated at their government for being unwilling or powerless in stopping the strikes from taking place, resulting in greater political, economic, and social instability — a fecund environment for terrorist groups to seize control over regions, further their doctrine, and recruit politically and financially aggrieved individuals.

Of course, the US drone program has its benefits, and its use is even necessary to hinder and eliminate difficult-to-capture terrorists who pose immediate threats to Western and foreign lives. However, in order to tackle the root cause of radicalization for many individuals, the American government needs to focus on countering the drones’ detrimental impact on the lives of civilians affected by the strikes.

This involves placing greater restrictions on the use of drones, and co-ordinating with the foreign governments in providing aid to families of victims, establishing schools, employment training programs, and medical facilities in efforts to stabilize areas that have been hit, as well as deter alienated or poverty-stricken individuals from joining militant groups.

Further collaboration with the Pakistani or Yemeni government and military is necessary to alleviate hostility towards the US, improve civilian trust in the capabilities of their local government, and relieve the political and economic instability that results from drone attacks.
Otherwise, the drone program runs the risk of creating more hostility and distrust in those whom it involves.

Vancouver art community threatened by Westside Church

1

The Centre cartoon-benbuckley

Religious values working against what The Centre was founded on

By Gloria Mellesmoen
Photos by Ben Buckley

Religion, much like preference in sexual fetishes, is a matter of choice that should be respected as long it is not forced on anyone or inflicting non-consensual pain. There are situations where these stipulations are less concrete, an example being the recent acquisition of The Centre for the Performing Arts by the Westside Church. Though this purchase will likely be a good choice for the congregation, it poses a serious threat to the artistic and cultural community of Vancouver.

The Vancouver Sun reports that the Vancouver International Film Festival (VIFF), an event with a vast number of volunteers and supporters that was to take place at The Centre, has had their booking cancelled abruptly as of last week. This leaves mere months for the festival to find another venue capable of meeting their size and accessibility requirements.

The Goh Ballet is also left without promise of a location for their annual performance of The Nutcracker. While the two groups represent different mediums, they both represent artists with a passion and an ability to breathe life into their shows. While Vancouver receives lackluster reviews when it comes to entertainment, VIFF and the Goh Ballet prove Vancouver does have an artistic side worth protecting.

Since its creation in 1995, The Centre has been the stage for a variety of performers from diverse walks of life. It has provided a place for the community to congregate and appreciate the dramatic, comedic, and musical feats that are the product of years of dedicated work. Though it is commonly associated with public performances, The Centre plays an important role to others in the community who utilize the venue, like the various secondary schools who rent it for graduation ceremonies.

The Centre is a venue that accepts those entering for who they are, and does not discriminate upon anyone deciding to attend an event. While the Westside Church undoubtedly works to create community, its scope is not as inclusive. The church has publicly expressed objections regarding several topics, such as homosexuality, abortion, and women as elders in the church, which can make members of the community feel unwelcomed.

Sermon notes entitled “Two for One” are posted on the Westside Church’s website and denounce the act of divorce as shameful and wrong. As the child of a divorced couple, I have firsthand knowledge of the discomfort that exists when navigating the religious world while not quite fitting the values laid out by a congregation. I remember seeing a Christmas play with my mother at a local church that capitalized on the importance of parents staying together because it’s the right thing to do. We stopped attending that church soon after.

Most religious groups do have definitions of morality and righteousness built into their sermons and placed as strong recommendations, if not requirements, for their congregation. This alone is not an issue, as everyone has a right to believe what they will. The problem arises when these beliefs create a division on the community.

The Westside Church buying The Centre for Performing Arts takes a venue rich with diversity and turns it into one with rigid values that exclude or cause discomfort for many in the community. Vancouver is home to a population boasting an acceptance of differences. The Centre is an element of this, a place recognizing performing arts as an important part of the city’s culture belonging to everyone. Though the Westside Church creates inclusive space for those identifying with the congregation, it fails to resonate with the greater community and is therefore inflicting a problem Vancouver has not consented to.

Planters introduces ‘Segregated Nuts’

0

segregatednuts

Popular nut company’s new product to eliminate unnecessary mixing of inferior snacks

By Gary Lim

ANDALUSIA, AL — The world of mass produced salted legumes may never be the same again following an announcement from famed snack food conglomerate Planters Peanuts. After several decades, the long awaited follow-up to the company’s flagship product “Mixed Nuts” was finally been debuted last Friday, the new line of “Segregated Nuts.”

Industry sources say the new product will contain all the same ingredients found in the classic mixed nuts in the exact proportions. The only difference is now each individual species of nut will be partitioned into its own separate compartment to prevent any unwanted mixing or commingling.

Company vice president and CEO Thaddeus Suffield, dressed in an immaculate white Sunday suit and sipping a mint julep, greeted reporters last Tuesday on a specially built porch outside Planters World Headquarters in Andalusia, Alabama.

“We at planters believe that while the general consensus nowadays is that nuts should be allowed to mix as they please,” Suffield explained, “there are still some people who would prefer it the pecans kept to the pecans and the almonds to the almonds.”

“Some of us long for the good old days when it was a man’s God-given right to determine how familiar he wanted his Brazil nuts to get with his pine nuts without the union gov’ment cramming down our throats.”

Pausing to pour himself another drink, Suffield continued, “I don’t want to bore you nice folk with all high-falutin’ science speak , but our food scientists have assured me you won’t find so much as an acorn’s fart mixed in with the pistachios.”

“These fine folks know what they’re doing. We’re not paying these people peanuts, keep sure of that,” added Suffield, guffawing loudly while holding an empty glass.

“Damn greasy pistachios. Why I remember a day when you could enjoy the pristine purity of grabbing a handful of peanuts without biting into some bland walnut. Hic! Now you listen here boy, if the Macedamias ever get the vote, it’ll be absolute anarch – ”

“The press conference then had to be cut short due to a ‘peanut emergency’ which only Mr. Suffield himself could take care of” explained one of the Planters representatives who came onstage to take the microphone away from him.

Meanwhile, market analysts are already predicting steady gains for Planters throughout the next quarter with segregated nuts already testing well with those people who like to pick all the M&Ms out of the trail mix the fuckers.

SFU hosts talk on North American decolonization

0

Idle No More organizers Danita Nez and Steven Kakinoosit

Idle No More BC organizer talks about the movement and the push for decolonization

By Rachel Braeuer, Michael McDonell, and Daniel Petrovic
Photos by Stephen Hui

This past week, SFU was host to a talk with Steven Standing Wolfpaw Kakinoosit, one of the founding members of Idle No More BC. Organized by Left Alternative, an action group at SFPIRG, Kakinoosit was part of a “Beyond Ownership: Continuing North American Decolonization” event aimed at raising awareness of decolonization, speaking to its ties with the Idle No More movement.

Kakinoosit is Woodland Cree from the Suckercreek First Nation in Alberta, born and raised in Prince George, BC. As an Indigenous and human rights activist who has been working with Idle No More in BC since its fruition, he has organized, spoken, and taught communities about the movement on the local, national, and international level.

Tracing the beginnings of Idle No More to events in July 2012, fueled by a group of four women in Saskatchewan, the moment that really got the ball rolling for Kakinoosit is when over 150 chiefs were denied their treaty rights to be present at the debates preceding a decision on Bill C-45. The bill, when passed, reduced the number of federally protected waterways in Canada.

For Kakinoosit, a move away from the often ignored treaties is an important step towards decolonization and Indigenous sovereignty; regrettably, with the passing of Bill C-45 and C-38, the treaties are one of the few legal documents remaining that protect traditional Indigenous lands.

Decolonization is, by definition, the dismantling and undoing of colonialism. In Canada, the 11 numbered treaties originally began as agreements between the Indigenous peoples of Canada and the reigning monarch of Canada. The responsibility on Canada’s end has since been transfered to be that of the government acting on the Crown’s behalf, but the existence of the treaties refers specifically to a colonial past.

While the treaty system is intended to provide a system for equitable redistribution of assets, Kakinoosit asserts that this has not been the case. “We signed [the treaties] as one nation to another,” he stated. “And that hasn’t been respected.”

Decolonization is an old idea, with roots that can be traced back to the 13 colonies revolting against the United Kingdon. This movement has gained impetus within the last century; India, Pakistan, Ghana, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, and Iceland (to name a few) have all fought for and achieved independence from their colonizers. Though sometimes a difficult concept for some to imagine in a Canadian context, there is a historical precedent set, given its own independence from Great Britain.

The biggest problem according to Kakinoosit lies not in decolonization itself, but rather in the process of rebuilding something that would follow. “The real job is when we start applying the lessons that we’ve learned from taking the oppressor out, because there are lessons to be learned from our oppressor: what to do and what not to do,” he said.

Kakinoosit is a self-described traditionalist, and pointed out that decision making methods before colonization were sometimes more democratic than present systems that leave communities stuck in a space somewhere between traditional and colonial. He urged Indigenous people to return to their traditional systems of governance, a right protected by the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

“The chief and council system is not our traditional governing system, regardless of what anyone will say,” he contended. Kakinoosit also argued that the imposition of the system is not only part of the reason why there is a rural urban divide in the Indigenous community generally, but also why the democratic process on reserves is questionable at best.

“When you set up a majority rule on reservations, what you find is that it ends up being a name game . . . it’s nepotism,” he explained. In a traditional clan system, such as was used in Kakinoosit’s Cree nation, Okama, or hereditary leaders — male or female — were selected by clan mothers based on who had the best interests of the community at heart. If they ever lost the respect of the community, they would no longer be considered a leader.

“It’s difficult to imagine,” offered Kakinoosit, who alleged that under this system, there would be no leaders in Canada.

Kakinoosit spoke about how the reservation system itself sets up divides between on-reserve and off-reserve Indigenous communities, creating urban ghettos where a large majority of Indigenous people live. He cites one of the responsibilities of Idle No More as bringing off-reserve Indigenous people back into the conversation in the push for decolonization.

Above all, a respect for and inclusion of a multitude of voices, Indigenous or not, within the movement was articulated, with a stipulation. “We want to make clear that it is paramount that we [Indigenous people] lead this movement,” says Kakinoosit, who referenced other moments in history where Indigenous activism has been written off as communities responding to “outside agitation” from non-Indigenous groups, maintaining that “we need our allies.”

Kakinoosit ended the evening by describing moments where ethnic and cultural differences fall to the wayside in Canada, such as when Sidney Crosby scored the goal in overtime during the Canada vs. America 2010 winter Olympics hockey game. “If we could capture that moment again, that would speed up the whole process of decolonization like that,” he said, snapping his fingers.

Media censorship at an all-time high [low]

0

important_document

Shocking information reveals how [little] Canadian media is being doctored by outside forces.  

By Brad McLeod

VANCOUVER — A new report on the state of Canadian media released last Monday has shown that the amount of censorship on television, radio and in newspapers is [lower] than at any point in history, with all publications being [FREE TO SAY WHATEVER THEY WANT WITHOUT BEING CENSORED].

Although that last sentence may not seem to be in line with what you’d expect from a democratic society’s media, statistics from the report show that governments and outside groups have almost [zero per cent] control over even the smallest of publications.

“I think this report proves how ridiculous the state of our media is right now,” lamented communications expert Dr. Hugh McLean, shocked at how [little censorship exists in our country]. “I guess I shouldn’t be surprised though, our society is becoming more and more similar to something out of George Orwell’s [Personal diary entry about a lovely afternoon he once spent at the beach] every single day.”

According to the report, although governments are perhaps the largest [abstainers] from censoring content in order to maintain public support, there are also many other groups who feel the need to [rarely impose their ideals onto media outlets].

“Most people don’t even realize that this kind of [lack of] censorship exists in this country, let alone how many different corporations, political organizations and special interest groups are also involved in this massive [fair and democratic system we have]” explained a [definitely still living] activist who preferred to remain anonymous. “Hopefully this report can finally get the word out and people will finally become aware of [                                     ].”

While it isn’t a secret that television and newspapers exist largely thanks to advertisements, according to the report, sponsoring companies do more than just run ads but actually have [small] sway and control over content, which often manifests itself in [a declining amount of] product placement.

This notion was supported by Dr. McLean who told the Peak, [in between bites from the delicious new Pizza Burger from Boston Pizza, a bacon burger wrapped in a pepperoni pizza made with hand-pressed original crust, smothered in Boston Pizza’s signature pizza sauce and pizza mozzarella, then baked to perfection], “Yes, I support that notion.”

Although a great deal of the media censorship [that hasn’t been going on very much recently] is related to commercial and political ambitions, the report has also shown that a large amount of the censorship [again, that’s in decline and rarely happens anymore] also comes from groups who are only looking to, for some reason, protect their own personal ideas of what is decencent and acceptable content.

One of the main [non-] offenders is the Good Standards Society, a group dedicated to [being open to letting media outlets decide for themselves about] removing racist, sexist or homophobic material, such as content that has any mention of race, gender or sexual orientation.

As the Good Standards Society, or the GSS, is made up of guilty white people [a diverse group] interested in not offending anyone, they [in no way would] work to limit a publication from printing anything that would, say, imply that it is a stereotype that [loud] people talk loudly in movie theatres.

To view the full report detailing how media censorship in Canada has never been [less] of a concern and a side by side comparison to how reminiscent our media censoring is to [regular] Germany, please visit www.[                                                  ].ca

University Briefs

0

Briefs

By Kristina Charania

Ecuador volcano kills U of C student

On June 2, University of Calgary chemical engineering student Danielle Kendall was hit by a car-sized block of ice while scaling the Cotopaxi stratovolcano in Ecuador with a group of climbers. The 22 year old was set to graduate with her degree this week and was also part of the University of Calgary’s track and field team — where she had won several awards in national competitions. The @UofCTrack Twitter account posted their condolences after the incident, saying that “The [track] team needs each other now more than ever as we mourn the loss of one of our own. Thoughts and prayers to her family and friends.”

With files from  CBC News

 

U of S College of Medicine accreditation further postponed

Though Saskatchewan’s single medical school, the University of Saskatchewan, is currently accredited, it has been on probation since July 2011, and The Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools isn’t planning to change that in the near future. At the beginning of their probation, The College of Medicine was found deficient in 10 different areas including delayed responses from professors to students, insufficient space and lockers at the Regina location, and difficulties with standardizing classroom material and grading goals. A lack of significant improvement in these areas will result in prolonged probation, with the possibility of a cleared status in October 2013 at the earliest.

With files from  Global News BC

 

Report suggests ways that Canadian research can boost economy

In a new C.D. Howe Institute report, author Peter Howitt notes that Canadian universities’ flow of new technology from researchers to corporate businesses pales in comparison to the system in the United States. He suggested several workable solutions including pushing the National Research Council to eventually become a cross Canada technology transmission institute, keeping research papers on accessible online databases and providing details on commercialization to scientists. The end goal, he noted, “is to create first-rate universities where first-rate scientists can pursue research that appeals to their curiosity, and encourage business to invest in commercializing their discoveries.”

With files from  The Wall Street Journal

 

Stopping Atlantic provinces’ brain drain may revitalize aging workforce

New findings in a study conducted by the four East coast premiers and the Association of Atlantic Universities show 35 per cent of international students surveyed were not interested in staying in Canada because of fewer work opportunities, while 21 per cent wished to stay closer to their overseas families. Atlantic universities tend to heavily target potential students from Brazil, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Recruits noted that Canada is a good place to complete post-secondary education because the universities are secure and safe. Retaining these students after graduation would help create both a flourishing workforce and a revitalized economy.

With files from  The Globe and Mail

Unlocking the origins of life

0

WEB-RNA-Courtesy of SFU

New grant may help SFU scientist Peter Unrau show that RNA is the key element

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by SFU News

Questions like “What is the purpose of life?” and “Where did we come from?” have captivated humankind for as long as our species has been alive. Now, supplemented with a key research grant, an SFU scientist may be on track to helping answer the questions of life’s origins.

Peter Unrau, a professor of molecular biology and biochemistry at SFU, is the recipient of one of this year’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Accelerator Supplement (DAS) awards. The award, valued at $120,000, is part of a $413 million national research funding announcement supporting thousands of researchers across the country who, according to NSERC, are investigating “high risk, novel or potentially transformative concepts and lines of inquiry.”

By investigating how life began on Earth about 3.7 billion years ago, Unrau is doing just that. His main work revolves around the hypothesis that RNA played a substantive role in the early evolution of life. This theory, developed by Sid Altman and Thomas Cech in the 1960s and coined in the 1980s, is known as the RNA World Hypothesis.

“DNA is where we store our genetic information,” explained Unrau. “And we convert that into RNA by transcription, and once we have that RNA it gets translated by the ribosome into proteins, which are the machines that keep us alive . . . The problem with the model is that it doesn’t explain where we came from. Proteins are very useful, but where did the first proteins come from?”

To solve this puzzle, the RNA World Hypothesis proposes that RNA molecules were the first complex molecules, existing even before DNA and protein. RNA stores genetic information like DNA, but can also catalyze complex chemical reactions just like an enzyme protein. Therefore, scientists propose that it may have been able to carry out the necessary functions for creating life.

Unrau explained, “There’s a lot of critical machines in the cell that are not actually protein based, for example, the ribosome. It’s responsible for protein synthesis and yet its made out of RNA, not protein. This suggests a way that evolution could have worked really early in evolution. You could have had this machine made out of RNA which was responsible for making proteins that one by one replaced the RNA catalysts of the RNA World.  If this picture is true then you should be able to catalyze all of the reactions that are catalyzed by proteins today using only RNA.”

To support the hypothesis, Unrau and his team are trying to find evidence that “machines” that can do the kinds of reactions, that would have been important in such a world, can be built out of RNA.

“We’re trying ultimately to make a system that can evolve on its own, built out of RNA, and that would stand on its own,” said Unrau. “It would be a parallel example of a living system that would have no history connecting it directly to life we have today, and so from that point of view it would be a good example of what kind of things are really important in living systems and what kind of things are not important.”

Such research could potentially lead to answering larger questions of the existence of other life in the Universe. “Right now there’s a really open and exciting scientific question which is how common is life in the Universe, and its either really common or we’re really lucky to be here.”