Go back

Proud Boys named terrorist group in Canada

Political theorist Samir Gandesha explains that the terrorist designation is not enough, due to loose definitions

Written by: Jaymee Salisi, News Writer 

On February 3, 2021, the Canadian government announced 13 groups as terrorist entities. Among these extremist groups were the Proud Boys. Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety, stated in the government release that the terrorist designation is “an important step in [Canada’s] effort to combat violent extremism in all forms.”

Established in 2016 by Canadian Gavin McInnes, the Proud Boys are self-proclaimed “Western-chauvinists,” known for white supremacist ideologies. On his talk show, McInnes advocated for violence against women and stated he is “not a fan of Islam.” The group incited violence as counter-supporters during Black Lives Matter protests and participated in the recent insurrection of the US Capitol.

Following the events of January 6, 2021 at Capitol Hill in Washington, the New Democratic Party leader, Jagmeet Singh, called on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to “immediately ban and designate the Proud Boys as a terrorist organization,” on the grounds that they are a “right-wing extremist group that promotes white supremacist views.”

In an interview with The Peak, associate humanities professor and political theorist Samir Gandesha explained how a terrorist designation is not an effective way to de-platform white supremacy groups. He cited the passing of The Anti-Terrorism Act, which former Canadian prime ministers and parliament members criticized for its loose restrictions on the disruption of terrorist activity. 

The act allows the criminalization of people who knowingly advocate or promote terrorism offenses in general. It also “allows the preventative arrest and detention of a person if it is ‘likely’ to prevent a terrorist activity.”

Gandesha said designating the Proud Boys as terrorists according to the Anti-Terrorism Act undermines the anti-terrorist efforts of groups such as ANTIFA, and could disproportionately increase vulnerability in marginalized communities by normalizing extremism. He noted, for example, that Indigenous people challenging developments such as pipeline construction could be defined and targeted as terrorists under the same act. Using “flawed legislation” is not the right way to make significant change against white supremacy in Canada, said Gandesha. 

Under this legislation, he explained, members of the Proud Boys can still participate in other groups as they have not been named individually and expressing hate is not a terrorist offence. For instance, the Proud Boys’ Manitoba chapter rebranded and may continue to function. 

Instead, Gandesha stated that the government needs to dismantle white supremacy by “creating the conditions that would make the emergence and expression of white supremacy less likely.” The solutions he suggested include “resourcing communities so they can engage in self-organization and self defense” He explained that doing this would mean significant reform within democratic institutions, like electoral reform and restructuring the economy, “for the benefit of the many and not the few.”

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...

Read Next

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...
Picked For You

Today’s Top Picks,

For You

photo of Skytrain expo line

TransLink’s fare enforcement blitz is a terrible idea

By: Yagya Parihar, SFU Student In my lifetime of using public transit, I only remember having been fare checked three times. All three times were in BC while exiting SkyTrain stations in late 2024. I tapped my pass on the fare gate, and the transit cop asked to see my…

This is a photo of an empty SUB hallway that features the “SFSS Admin Offices” room. Next to the room is a big bulletin board with about 30 neatly lined-up posters and a big red number 3 to indicate the level of the SUB.

Five SFSS full-time union staff receive layoff notices

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer and Hannah Fraser, News Editor The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) has initiated staff layoffs, with five out of eight full-time union positions affected as of July 25. All the positions either support student activities or the SFSS’ operations, and do not include SFSS executives.…

This is a photo of the SFU Surrey Engineering Building from the inside. There are numerous levels to the building, artificial trees, and a wide staircase in the photo.

TSSU speaks on latest updates to IP policy

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer As recently reported by The Peak, the Senate reviewed and discussed a new draft version of its intellectual property (IP) policy solely focused on the commercialization of inventions and software. Based on community feedback, they split the IP policy into two: one for inventions and…

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...