Go back

What Grinds Our Gears: The “Devil’s advocate” guy

We’ve got enough going on to argue for the sake of arguing

By: Yasmin Vejs Simsek, Staff Writer

“Just playing the devil’s advocate” is arguing for the sake of argument, and it helps nothing 

I’ve had people tell me that white cisgender straight men are discriminated against in western societies, that hiring quotas are unfair, and that I wouldn’t know because I’m a woman. Never mind that I am doing a Masters in gender studies. It’s so ludicrous I can only assume people say this to wind me up. Why engage then?

Who even gave these Luciferian advocates the autonomy to play their role? The only people that find pleasure in this concept are people from a privileged background who never had to argue and defend their identity or heritage to anyone. The same goes for men who feel the need to throw in a bit of mansplaining for good measure.  

Do we not have enough to fight about in our day-to-day lives? No, Gladys, we don’t need to hear you give the “other” point of view on LGBTQIA2S+ rights. And no, Bert, we don’t need to hear about your fake research into how global warming is a hoax. We’re still fighting a pandemic, witnessing a war that’s negatively impacting global trade, and hey! Monkey pox!  

Sure, some people want to argue the other side to things like the earth being flat and arguably it’s not hurting anyone directly per se. But the midway point between nonsense and sense is still nonsense. So next time you want to play Devil’s advocate, think about why. Is there a need for this discussion? Will anyone gain anything from it? Will I spontaneously combust if I don’t take on this role? If the answer is no to any of the above, practice silence and see your surroundings flourish.

And so the Devil’s advocates can go straight to hell.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Read Next

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...