Home Blog Page 1358

Tough week for women’s soccer

0

Women’s soccer fails to score goals in two losing games

By Bryan Scott

Simon Fraser Women’s soccer had a tough week on the pitch. They began with a one-goal loss on Terry Fox Field on Sept. 8 to the Academy of Art Urban Knights from San Francisco. The teams remained scoreless after the first half, despite the Clan outshooting their opponents 4–1. The Urban Knights picked up their play in the second half, they came back to outshoot the clan 7–6 in the game and they buried the only goal they would need in the 62nd minute, there was a defensive breakdown and the Knights took advantage. “We had trouble attacking, and we didn’t string passes together, which kept us from scoring,” explained Clan midfielder Aja Choy-Halo.

The Clan then traveled to Lacey, WA, to do battle against the Saints from Saint Martins University, on Sept. 13.  The first half was intense. “The game was played pretty evenly in the first half, we both had some quality opportunities,” said head coach Shelley Howieson. The Saints fired 11 shots on the net to the Clan’s three in the game. Goaltender Amanda Gilliand was good, making three saves, but it was not enough. With only 12 seconds on the clock, the Saints dealt the fatal blow by putting it in the back of the net, dashing the hopes of the Clan and taking the game 1–0.

It seems the bounces did not go the right way for the Clan this week as they move to 1–3 on the season and remain 0–1 in conference play.

Clan volleyball starts season below .500

0

SFU volleyball falls to 2–4 after six games

By Bryan Scott

The Simon Fraser Women’s Volleyball team began their season with the Red Lion Invitational. They finished with a respectable 2–2 record.  Their first opponents of the tournament was Evergreen College, the Clan, eager after a long off-season took the match three sets to one.  They would sweep Camosun College the next morning, but lose the next two games to Northwest College (1–3), and Columbia Bible College (0–3).

The Clan opened up their home schedule against the University of Fraser Valley Cascades on Sept. 10. The game took the full five sets to complete. The first set was indicative of the entire match which went on until the Clan took it 28–26. The Clan took the second set by the same score. Unfortunately, their good fortune ended after that set and the Cascades to the next three to win the match 3–2. “We didn’t show up tonight as much as we’d like to but we’re continuing to build,” said Clan Amanda Renkema who had 13.5 points on the day.

The clan continued their uphill battle when they opened the GNAC schedule against the defending champion Falcons from Seattle Pacific University. The Falcons took the first set handedly 25–14 but the Clan battled back to take the second set 25–23. This was all they could muster up however, the Falcons defeated the Clan by taking the last two sets 25–22 and 25–19 to win the game three sets to one.

After the six games, the Clan are 2–4 on the season and 0–1 in conference play. They were in action again on Sept. 15 against the Montana State University Billings Yellowjackets.

Clan move to 5–0 after successful week

0

Men’s soccer still undefeated

By Bryan Scott

The Simon Fraser Men’s soccer team had a busy week with three games. Their first game was against Azusa Pacific University. They continued their domination of opposing teams with a 6–1 victory on home field in front of 642 cheering fans.  The clan took every opportunity to shoot, firing 18 shots in the first half. Lucas Ferrito, the Red Lion Offensive Player of the Week, scored the game winner in the 45th minute after a good passing play. The Clan led 2–0 after the first half. The second half started with an offensive explosion. After Midfielder Justin Wallace booted home a penalty kick in the 54th minute, they scored two more 35 seconds apart in the 56th minute to give them a 5–0 lead that they wouldn’t give up. Azusa would break the shutout with a few minutes left in the match.

Their second game of the week was against the Hawaii Pacific Sea Warriors. Burnaby Mountain was back to its usual gray and rainy state, which seemed to throw the Clan off track early in the first half. This game would be unlike any they’ve played so far. The Sea Warriors came out determined and scored the first goal of the game in the 17th minute.  Soon, Clan forward John Hodnett scored his second goal in as many games to tie it late in the first. In the 61st minute, sniper Carlo Basso scored his seventh goal in four games to give the Clan a 2–1 lead. Ferrito scored for a second straight game, and once again it proved to be the game winner as the Clan won a close one, 3–2.

The final game of the week went down on Terry Fox Field against the Montana State University Billings Yellowjackets.  Despite the Clan already having played four games, this is their first in the conference. Goaltender J.D. Blakeley provided the perfect game in the 2–0 victory. “We knew it was going to be a tough game but everyone came out and did their jobs,” he said after the game. “Everytime they had the ball, we were pressuring them as much as we could, and it paid off.  It was a hard fought game and it’s good to come away with the win.”

Midfielder Chris Bargholz and Hodnett provided the offensive, and the Clan moved to 5–0 on the season and 1–0 in conference play.

The Clan played the Northwest Nazarene Crusaders on Saturday Sept. 15 at Terry Fox Field.

Apparently, America has forgotten how to keep its mouth shut

0


The only time it’s appropriate to open your mouth in America is when you’re drinking the Kool-Aid

By Rashed Aqribawi

I woke up on Tuesday morning, Sept. 11, and carried out my usual routine of checking the morning news, except that I decided to see what the other side had to say. I typed in “Foxnews.com,” and almost instantly I was bombarded with at least a dozen articles, videos and features with terms like “9/11,” “War on Terrorism,” “remembrance.” But what really caught my eye was a video entitled, in large block letters, “Baker: America Has Forgotten to Keep Its Mouth Shut”, so naturally, I clicked on it.

Mike Baker was a former CIA Covert Operations officer, co-founder and President of Diligence LLC. He was on with Don Harman, (who was wearing a cowboy hat on live television), to talk about The New York Times’s most recent sensation, No Easy Day, by author Michael Owen (pseudonym). The book is a first-hand account of a Navy Seal, who was subsequently identified by the media as Michael Bissonnette, who participated in the operation that found and killed Osama Bin Laden. Bissonnette justifies the book’s publication as part of his duty as an American to notify the rest of the world about what really happened during the operation, and his personal experience as a Navy Seal, from training until said operation.

In the interview, Mike Baker states that Michael Owen, the author, was outwardly defying U.S. Navy protocol, his right as a citizen, and was going against his principles and moral compass by publishing that book, stating that it is “classified information” that the public has no right to know. Don Harman pointed out that Owen said that he wrote the book to correct some of the false information given out by White House officials on the day of the announcement. Then Baker rebuked, saying “cork the pie-hole, it’s not up to him to set the record straight.” He believes that the Seal violated his principles and his morals by publishing the book. This is a little ironic, seeing as the author stated that his reasons for publishing were to the exact contrary; he believed he was honouring his morals and principles.

No Easy Day has created a large controversy in America over its publication, and is seen by some army officials as defiance of the outfit and an outright violation of his permitted rights, which, according to Defence Secretary Leon Panetta, “cannot go unpunished.” On the other hand, many media officials and analysts stated that in reality he was not actually releasing classified information, merely the event as experienced by him.

In the socio-political oxymoron that is free America, where the word freedom has been dropped every few seconds (in a neo-Martin Luther King voice) in this years election speeches, one man who shared his experience in Afghanistan, in a war and an operation that American citizens pay for. Apparently, this is a violation of his rights, and when they put freedom of speech in the Bill of Rights, they were only joking. So, to any Navy Seals out there who are thinking of publishing a diary, the message is clear: shut up, please.

The Mullets: Mullet

0

By Travis Dandro

Where are they now: Sept 17, 2012

0

Ever wonder what happened to those celebrities who were everywhere back then, but have since fallen off the face of the earth? Well, stop asking yourself stupid questions and find out where they are — now!                         ­


Bigfoot

Formerly popular cryptic beast

Although Bigfoot was a star in the 20th century, making appearances in blurry photographs in all the most respected tabloids, he mysteriously fell off the world’s radar aroundthe same time that autofocus became a standard camera feature. Nowadays he’s become somewhat of a recluse, rarely appearing in public and spending most of his time at his Area 51 Ranch.

 

 

Carmen Sandiego

Elusive video game character

Sandiego spent her most prolific years on the lam as the ringleader of V.I.L.E., a criminal organization dedicated to tricking kids into learning about geography. Where in the world is she now? In 2005 Carmen was finally brought to justice for her crimes and is currently serving a life sentence at the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in Clinton, New Jersey.

 

 

Your Pokemon cards

Remember, you even had that shiny Gyarados

You probably haven’t thought about them for years, but I’m sure that all your totally rad Pokemon cards are just the way you left them: in mint condition and ready to be sold for so much money! I mean, what a great investment! Oh shit. . . never mind, they’re all worthless . . . and your mom gave them away at a yard sale . . . and you’re not going to be able to pay off those student loans now. . . . Oh well, at least you’ve still got that Beanie Baby collection: that must be worth a ton by now!

By Brad McLeod

Blackout: The serious and deadly nature of concussions

0

By Sheldon Kenny (The Sheaf)
Illustration by Brianna Whitmore (The Sheaf)

 

This past November I lost my brother Lyndon Kenny to suicide.

Lyndon was a very good hockey player: the Brandon Wheat Kings of the Western Hockey League drafted him, and he was not only a highly-skilled defenceman and strong skater, but also the toughest person I have ever known. His ability to scare opponents and produce game-changing hits and fights was unparalleled for someone of his age.

Unfortunately, this enforcer style of play made my brother vulnerable to multiple concussions and, therefore, more susceptible to depression.

Enforcers are the designated tough guys on a hockey team. Players in this role often struggle with depression, not only because they suffer numerous and severe head injuries, but also because they must deal with the pressure of fighting almost every game in order to keep their spot in the lineup.

Lyndon was no exception.

My brother became addicted to alcohol and drugs at an early age. His addictions carried on through most of his life, despite multiple stints in rehab centres.

He was not the kind of drug addict we see on T.V., though; he hardly let it show in his personal life. He was the most loving and caring person I knew, and was constantly looking out for others.

He struggled to explain his problems to our family, however, and for a long time he turned away from those closest to him — ever the archetypal tough guy, he tried to cope with his struggles alone. It was only recently that Lyndon came to understand that he needed help. He began to open up to our family, and made an effort to guide me down a better path of life than the one that he had taken.

He had been free of drugs and alcohol for two months before he took his own life on Nov. 1.

The depression and anxiety proved too much for him.

Only a few weeks before his death, Lyndon left a comment on a sports medicine website indicating his struggles:

“I’m 27 and have been on a serious decline since [my] early to mid- teens,” my brother wrote. “I have had hundreds of blows to [the] head since I was around five. Most occurred from my reckless style of hockey throughout my teens. Here’s a list of symptoms I have: lack or loss of knowledge, insight, judgment, self, purpose, personality, intelligence, opinion, reasoning, train of thought, motivation, relationships, thinking, humour, ability to process information and learn, organize, planning, communicating, finding speech, decision making, visualizing, interest, sensitive to sound, ears ring, trouble sleeping, head aches, PCS [Post Concussion Syndrome] etc.”

Lyndon’s comment ended with an appeal: “Protect yourselves and loved ones! What a scary situation. I feel so bad for my family.”

His final wish came in the form of an unsent text message intended for me. Lyndon wanted to have his brain donated to research at the Boston University School of Medicine, so we could have the answers he had sought for years.

Concussed

A concussion is defined as a short-lived loss of brain function due to head trauma. A direct blow to the head is not required to sustain a concussion; any sudden and jolting motion to the body that causes the brain to move around inside the skull can do the same.

For a concussion to occur, the brain must bump against the skull, which can cause bruising. In some cases, the brain will rotate inside the skull, and when it rubs against the bony surface of the skull, it can shear off brain nerve fibres. In all cases, there are no visible injuries to the brain that are detectable by an MRI or CT scan.

In addition to the blurry vision, dizziness, and confusion, symptoms can include: difficulty sleeping, a sensitivity to noise and light, nausea, ringing in the ears, trouble concentrating, difficulty tolerating alcohol or stress, difficulty speaking, long- or short-term memory loss and a decreased sex drive.

People suffering the after-effects of concussions can also exhibit changes in behaviour including aggression, stubbornness, anxiety, and depression. These effects may be noticed for a week or more after a concussion, but with Post Concussion Syndrome, one might deal with the effects for months, depending on the  severity and treatment of the concussion.

With each concussion suffered, it becomes easier to sustain another, and with multiple concussions, the symptoms and side effects become more obvious.

With repeated head injuries, one can develop CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy).

 

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy

 

Lyndon was adamant that he suffered from CTE.

He knew everything about it and the pursuit of the answers he needed led him to many medical professionals who could have helped him. However, he was extremely frustrated by every doctor’s complete refusal of his claims, and he was angry with himself because he felt like he could not explain to them exactly how he was feeling.

It has recently been released that legendary professional hockey players Bob Probert and Derek Boogaard both suffered from extreme cases of CTE, which is no doubt a consequence of their roles as enforcers.

When a team needs something to give them a momentum boost, enforcers are counted upon to go out and get a big hit, or to get in a fight. This physical playing style leads to more blows to the head, resulting in a higher rate of concussions.

While we have yet to hear the results of the tests performed on Lyndon’s brain at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy in Boston, looking back at all the conversations we had and the symptoms he listed makes it obvious that he had in fact battled with CTE for a long time.

CTE is a degenerative brain disease most commonly found in athletes who have a history of repetitive brain trauma. It is a variant of dementia with symptoms similar to Alzheimer’s — mainly memory loss, aggression, confusion and depression — and  may appear months or years after initial trauma; unlike Alzheimer’s, however, it does not develop genetically.

There is some uncertainty about the number and severity of concussive injuries it takes to develop this brain deterioration, and how long it takes symptoms to start developing.

Upon studying the brains of deceased individuals, researchers have diagnosed CTE as black spots on the brain tissue, which is the build-up of an abnormal protein called tau. Poor recovery from a head trauma is linked to this protein when excess of it is found in the fluid surrounding the brain.

Sadly, there is no known way to reverse the effects of concussions. Even sadder is the fact that CTE can only be diagnosed after death.

As of 2009, only 49 cases of CTE have been researched and published by medical journals. However, the Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy, founded in 2008, recently began a clinical study of over 150 former NFL athletes aged 40–69 and 50 athletes of non-contact sports of the same age, all of whom are still alive and participating in sport. The goal of the study is to develop methods to diagnose CTE before death, which can hopefully lead to a cure in the future.

The Future

After witnessing my brother go through what he did, all I want is to see a higher level of understanding of concussions. They are deadly.

The cultures of all sports, not just hockey, need to change to adjust for this growing problem. Most importantly, the stigma of being the one to leave a game due to a concussion needs to stop because, in hindsight, the ones who take a step back and admit that there is something wrong are the tough ones.

I would be lying if I said I was not scared for myself.

I’ve played a lot of hockey in my life, have suffered a number of hard hits to the head and have been knocked unconscious twice.

In the past few years I have dealt with depression and anxiety and, although it can’t be proven, the fact that they may be a result of my concussions is a very real possibility.

I have also started to notice that I am dealing with some of the same symptoms that my brother felt he was experiencing. I have noticed a loss of personality, intelligence, motivation, and humour. My ability to learn and communicate has decreased and I have had trouble sleeping.

I hope for my own and my family’s sake that I am simply reacting to the loss of my brother, but right now, I cannot be certain.

Intolerance and division: the agenda of the P.Q. minority government?

0

Canadian politics taking a turn for the undemocratic

By Kai Yang Shiao
Photos by Ben Buckley

Although it failed to win a majority of the seats in the National Assembly (provincial legislature of Quebec) the pro-independence Parti Quebecois (P.Q.) managed to obtain a plurality, and thus form a minority government. This is disturbing, as the party was able to achieve this electoral outcome with 31.94 per cent of the popular vote despite the troubling tone of its campaign rhetoric. A closer examination of its various proposals demonstrates that the minority mandate is effectively giving the P.Q. the green light to pursue discriminatory policies.

During the campaign, the P.Q. asserted itself as the guardian of the secular nature of Quebec society. Its official view was that the Government of Quebec must never adopt an official religion, and remain completely neutral. According to party leader Pauline Marois, in its first 100 days in office, her party would introduce a bill designed to better protect this principle by banning religious symbols from being worn in government offices. While the proposal may at first seem to strengthen secularism, a further look at the other provisions contained within the same proposal would actually undermine this principle. By exempting those wearing a Christian cross from the proposed bill, the P.Q. is implicitly sending the message that it prefers those belonging to the Christian faith over Quebeckers’ other faiths.

More importantly, the proposal indicates a strong desire to use the legal authority of the state to ensure the favourable treatment of Christians over all other religious communities. Such a proposal, if enacted into law, would further divide, rather than unite, a province that has already seen heated battles between federalists and separatists. The proposal to extend the jurisdiction of the existing language law Bill 101 will further exacerbate this by reigniting tensions between the anglophones and francophones after years of relatively peaceful coexistence between the two groups.

The language debate was brought into the spotlight once again as Pauline Marois recycled the decade-old myth that French was on the decline in the province. While statistics show that the opposite is true, an appeal to emotion was evidently effective in attaining considerable electoral success. This formed the basis of the P.Q.’s attempt to provide the justification for its proposal to further marginalize the use of English in a province where its status is already in a fragile state. Under a P.Q. government, Bill 101 would be extended to ban francophones and allophones (mother tongue is neither English nor French) from attending English-language CEGEPs (pre-university colleges). By depriving its citizens of the freedom to choose the language of instruction at the university level, the proposal represents an unnecessary intervention by the state. Furthermore, this raises a question: once the ban on English-language CEGEPs is enacted, will the same be done for their university counterparts, including the world class McGill University?

The open use of divisive tactics to stir up tensions to achieve political desires has no place in a modern, multicultural, and tolerant Canada. Rather than giving votes of confidence to the party, it should have been shunned and sidelined in Quebec politics.

Who needs feminism?

1

By Lana Friesen

SFU needs a feminist campaign.

Not because SFU is crawling with sexists, but because many people are afraid to identify themselves as feminists. Given that feminism has a fundamental focus on equality, it is surprising that so few people on a Canadian university campus support it.

I don’t want to just deem this situation crazy and leave it at that. I want to invite people to profess themselves as feminists, and to actively discourage another anti-feminist backlash. I have not yet taken a GSWS course, and a past version of me may have hesitated to write this article before doing so. But feminism (or any issue of equality, at that) should not be limited to those who have studied it and know the differences between the different waves and theories of it.                                                                                           

Without an all-encompassing idea that can describe  modern feminism, the label should lend itself to a variety of people with a variety of viewpoints — so long as their viewpoints are in line with the value of equality.

Below are some of the common excuses that people use for not calling themselves feminists.

 

a) The “I don’t know a woman’s/a discriminated woman’s plight” argument:


I have heard this argument first-hand from a friend who refused to call himself a feminist. He thought it would be offensive to women if he claimed to empathize with their plight, just as he would be offended if someone of different circumstances claimed to understand his experiences. The problem here is the expectation that all feminists have homogenous experiences of discrimination, and that other marginalized groups can’t identify in the same way. Although experiences between people belonging to different groups differ, even within in the groups themselves, this is not reason enough to refrain from calling yourself a feminist. Feminism may focus on experiences, but it can also focus on values. So long as the drive for equality is there, different experiences — or lack thereof — should not prohibit someone from calling himself a feminist. Furthermore, feminist concerns include a variety of issues that include other genders, including the gender roles that face men.

 

b) The “I don’t want to be confused with those bitchy dykes who hate men” argument: 

 

There is just as much variety among GLBTQ people as there is among heterosexual people. To worry about being mistaken for a person of a different orientation exhibits some homophobia. We want to broaden the application of the term “feminist” and break stereotypes that are wrongly perceived. It is not inherent to feminists (nor to lesbians, for that matter) to hate men. Feminism is about furthering the rights of women, not about hating those that aren’t women. So wear your label with pride.

 

c) The “I hold very specific feminist views and don’t want to be mixed up with other feminists of other views” argument: 

 

A movement cannot progress without the active participation of those concerned. If you feel that other feminists misuse the label and don’t represent your experience or your values, then speak up — and not just in a backlash. Make sure your idea of feminism is being represented. This is an important part of ensuring that the term “feminism” includes what you espouse as well. If you don’t agree with everything that this term includes, that’s no reason for your contribution be left unheard. By professing your views, the discussion can stay relevant to your concerns. You just have to be patient and open-minded to participation.

 

The recent “Who Needs Feminism” campaign that began at Duke University addresses this issue. The social media campaign has attracted a variety of people from different backgrounds, and continues to build its online presence. It was started by a group of women’s studies students at Duke.  “[It] is reclaiming feminism as an umbrella for dialogue on issues that affect all of us,” Rachel Seidman — visiting lecturer to the responsible group of students — said of the campaign. The image of the umbrella perfectly describes the new usage of the term “feminist:” those concerned with a variety of issues and coming from diverse viewpoints, who can proudly fit together under this umbrella term. Seeking to eradicate the myth that feminism is now irrelevant, obsolete, or outdated, this new direction of feminism is just what we need: to keep the conversation going, and to take it to new levels and new issues via new mediums like Facebook and Tumblr.

 

The movement has grown, and on Sept. 6 and 7, students at SFU held a discussion on the topic: Who Needs Feminism? After hearing other stories from feminists who attended the campaign at SFU, the need for this campaign was more strongly and sharply felt.

 

“My students are convinced that reclaiming the word ‘feminism’ is key to any future progress on important issues concerning women — and to gaining greater acceptance and equality for everyone,” Seidman wrote recently. “They want to reach out to a wide variety of people, including those who have never before identified as feminists, and increase their sense of comfort with the word itself.”

Photos by Lana Friesen