Home Blog Page 1350

No animals were harmed: One meat-lover’s week as a vegan

0

By Ljudmila Petrovic

I love meat. Yeah, that’s what I said. Pulled pork, steak, chicken, seafood, you name it; except for a short flirtation with vegetarianism in high school (likely an act of rebellion against my carnivorous Serbian family), I have never considered an alternate lifestyle. Maybe it’s because of this that I have always been so fascinated with people that subscribe to veganism. I could never understand how vegans managed to live happy, full lives, and I have observed these individuals with a combination of disbelief and awe. I certainly understand the various reasons people become vegans including animal rights advocacy, morals, sustainability, and health. However, I have actively maintained that I couldn’t go a day as a vegan.
There were a number of reasons that I decided to not only accept the challenge of going a day without animal products, but to up the ante and make it a week. The idea almost started as a joke (me? Vegan? Hah!), but the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it would be a good experience. The main reason for taking this on was curiosity, both about my own personal limits, and about what veganism really looks like. Another reason was to learn about the lifestyle; even if I speak against a vegan lifestyle, I don’t want to do so in ignorance.

Day one:

I rise up bright and early to tackle my first day as a vegan. No meat, no eggs, no dairy products. I got this down pat. The options for breakfast are endless…until I open my fridge. Turns out my options are toast with jam and/or peanut butter. I also have honey, but apparently that falls under the realm of animal products, because it’s made by bees. Personally, I think that’s excessive, but I’m not going to argue. A good ol’ fashioned PB&J it is.
Now is the time to educate myself about what it is I’m getting myself into. The first website I come across is called veganism.com, and the home page is almost entirely a photograph of adorable, wide-eyed veal…. I’m sorry, calf. Every page I click on has the same prototypical baby animal. Now I feel like an asshole for my lifetime of eating animals.
I do a Google search about “What foods vegans can’t eat”. What comes up is more or less identical to the list of my favorite foods: no meat, no fish, no seafood, no milk products (here, they specified ice cream. Just to drive the point home.), no animal products whatsoever. Okay, I’m definitely taking a negative approach to this.
In the evening, I go to Made With Love, where twelve local bartenders compete in making an original cocktail. Turns out, most of the cocktails were not vegan: many used egg whites, while several even used ice cream or whipping cream. I didn’t realize this at first, but I figure that eating animal bi-products is like calories: it doesn’t count if it’s in an alcoholic beverage. Not only that, but the hors d’oeuvres floating around the room were made up of two of my favorites: pulled pork and chicken. In case you’re wondering if I cracked in my first 24 hours as a vegan, I didn’t.
Veganism is not so hard when you’re in charge of making your own meals, but going out can be a huge pain. Most events or restaurants do not take vegans into consideration, which puts the onus on the vegan to ask about the ingredients, and to try and find an alternative option. It had never crossed my mind before this, but, while most food services have a meatless option (or can at least accommodate it), it turns out that veganism is a whole other story.

Day two:

This day is significantly easier, because my plans were such that I managed to make all my meals for the day. Today is grocery day, but instead of getting whatever I feel like or whatever is on sale, I have to be ultra-conscious that it is all vegan. Knowing that I have only a very basic understanding of what vegans can and cannot eat, I play it safe and load up on things like lentils, avocados, and peanut butter. It is significantly more expensive than my regular grocery tab, and it takes considerably more aisle-wandering and label-checking. The latter is almost surely because of my rookie vegan status, but the former makes me realize that a vegan lifestyle is an even bigger commitment than I had initially thought. It requires sacrificing the cheap and easy way of life for a lifestyle that you presumably believe is the best one. Personally, I wouldn’t be able to make that commitment, and neither would many of the people that I know. Being vegan for a week is one thing, but my preference for eating whatever’s-in-the-fridge and whatever-was-on-sale far outweighs my drive to save animals and the environment through my diet. Some people take on the vegan diet for health reasons, but my experience so far hasn’t actually been healthier at all. I have had to swap my regular breakfast of egg and toast for things like toast with peanut butter, which is much higher in sugar, fat, and calories. Veganism can certainly be a healthy way of life, but it requires having enough money to afford quality vegan food, and the drive to be meticulous about healthy choices—something that can really be said about any kind of diet, not just a vegan one.

Day three:

It is not so hard to maintain a vegan diet, because today is another day where I make all my meals myself. For the first time in these three days, however, I feel my energy levels crashing. Early in the afternoon, I start feeling fatigued and sick. I pride myself on having an immune system of steel, so this is new to me. I’m not sure if the cause of my low energy is this vegan diet, but it would make sense that this sudden and complete shift in my nutrition would have an effect on my energy. I am shopping with a friend, and we were meant to go for lunch. However, I have such a sudden crash that I don’t have the energy to find a vegan place, and just play it safe and wait until I get home to eat. By that time (several hours later), I am convinced that the only possible explanation is that I am legitimately coming down with something. There’s no way that I can feel this fatigued otherwise. Some tofu and a vitamin B supplement (compliments of my vegetarian roommate) later, and I’m actually feeling quite normal.
I’m also really craving chocolate chip cookies and Kraft Dinner. My diet is usually varied and complex enough that I almost never get cravings (and especially not for junk), but I guess I haven’t yet figured out how to get everything I need in a vegan-friendly way. I have no doubt that a while of serious commitment to this lifestyle would be enough for me to learn these things, but at this point, I’m already passing by places advertising donair and wings, and telling myself: “In only four days….” I may just be the worst vegan in recent history.

Day four:

I’m tired, I’m cold, I’m irritable, and all I want is a juicy steak.
I feel like a bit of a failure because I can’t even handle four days of this while so many people manage to pull off years of it, but the truth is, I’m probably not doing it right. Either that, or the first week is the hardest part. Both are viable explanations.
The hardest part of this project isn’t even the fact that I can’t go a week without meat; it’s the fact that my body is trying to adjust to a sudden change in diet. I’m assuming the same would happen if I suddenly shifted to a gluten-free diet, or made any other massive dietary changes. I also lead an active enough lifestyle that I need all the energy I can get, and I simply have no figured out the healthy way to get the amount of calories I need without eating meat or animal products (and eating pounds of pasta or bread doesn’t count). Not to mention that I haven’t figured out how to keep my vegan meal plan exciting: I have had the same breakfast of peanut butter and toast for the past few days, I am already sick of lentils (which I generally love), and I am quite literally munching on a piece of tofu as I write this. I guess what I’m learning here is that lifestyle changes in general take time to get used to, and when it comes to diet, it’s much more difficult when you have dietary limitations. A change of this magnitude requires a shift in not only behavior but in mindset as well, and to be honest, I simply don’t care enough about being a vegan to be able to make that kind of change and really commit for longer than a week.

Day five:

I dream of meat. However, apart from last night’s extremely realistic dream about the most succulent, beautiful steak ever known to man, I am having no trouble being a vegan by Day 5. I had a dip in my energy levels at around the same time as previous days, but it wasn’t nearly as bad as Days 3 and 4. At this point, I think my body is getting more or less accustomed to the idea, and there is no doubt in my mind that several more weeks of this would be quite manageable in terms of how my body handles it. This being said, simply the fact that I’m not allowed to eat meat (as opposed to not being able to afford it, which is usually the case) makes it that much more difficult to abstain from it.
Safe in my home, mere steps away from a fridge full of lentils and tofu, I sign into Facebook—forgetting that I “liked” Memphis Blues’ page a few weeks ago. The first thing on my newsfeed is about their “fall-off-the-bone” lunch special, and an update on their pulled pork. My mental strength almost breaks at this point, because, man, do I love Memphis Blues’ pulled pork. I resist, however, reminding myself I’m on Day 5: so close to my goal. I make a chickpea salad, and tell myself how proud I’ll be when I can write that I went a full week without touching anything that came from an animal; but a part of me is still thinking: is veganism really worth it?

Day six:

Peanut butter, lentils: the day is evolving into the same old, same old. The only potentially interesting challenge to my veganism today is dinner with my mother. Now, just a little explanation: there are only two women I have ever met that can eat more lamb than me in one sitting, and my mother is one of them (the other one is her mother). My first thought was to try and convince her to go to a vegan restaurant. This would be a challenge, considering this is the woman who tried to convince me that chicken was completely vegetarian. We make a compromise and go to a Japanese restaurant. While she digs into her seafood yakisoba, I unhappily pick at my agedashi tofu and gommae. Despite my dramatic sighs, I get no pity from her. “Well, it’s your own fault for deciding to be vegan for a week”, she shrugs. “You should have chosen something else, like writing an article about what it’s like to eat only pork for a week”. Goddamn, she’s right. I could be eating bacon right now instead of fried tofu. Most of our dinner is spent brainstorming what I’m going to eat “when this thing is finally over”. Moral of the story: I’m obviously genetically incapable of being indefinitely vegan. This being said, I cannot help but feel pride at being the first person on my family tree to go a week without touching animal products.

Day seven:

I have to say, as interesting as this has been, I am very happy to be on my last day of eating vegan—the main reason for this being that I am running out of vegan food, and I couldn’t stand another uninspiring grocery trip to the tofu section. It’s not even that it was as aggravating and filled with temptation as I thought it would be, it’s just that I’m getting really bored of eating such a limited diet. Not only that, but this week has been the first time in a really long time that I’ve had such intensive cravings, mainly for things like ice cream. This makes me think that I wasn’t doing this right, and probably wasn’t getting everything that I usually get through meat and dairy. Other than this, I don’t even think about being a vegan throughout the day. It’s already become a bit of a habit, as long as I’m using ingredients that I have in the house (which, in the last week, have been vegan).
In retrospect, if I were to do this as a lifestyle, rather than an experiment, there are many things that I would have to do differently. For one thing, I’d have to stop bitching and complaining so much about it, and unapologetically commit to this being the way that I live my life. Eventually, assuming that I had the right mindset, my body would undoubtedly get used to the steak deprivation. I would also have to do a lot more research about vegan recipes. I am fairly creative with my food, but I don’t know enough about vegan options to have an elaborate meal plan.

Day eight:

Around Day 3, I was convinced that by the time the week was up, I would be crawling into the kitchen at midnight on Day 8 to eat ham out of desperation. A little melodramatic, I know, but for the record, I didn’t do this. I woke up at an average time, and made my regular breakfast of eggs. It’s as if I had never stopped eating animal products. I had been avoiding dinner at my parents’ house, knowing that my father would try and be supportive by making his signature “vegetarian” dish: beans which happen to be cooked in beef broth and have chunks of smoked meat in them. Now that I’m eating meat again, however, I have nothing to fear. Sure enough, their fridge is filled with leftovers: roast chicken, skewers of pork, lamb, beef, and salmon fillets. Sure enough, there’s a roast chicken waiting for me when I get there.
The day is much easier, because I don’t have to think about what I eat. Maybe it’s a placebo effect, but I swear I have more energy, and am full for longer after a meal. This experiment was a good one in terms of learning about new experiences, but I would never go the vegan route. It’s certainly a more sustainable and morally sound lifestyle, but the amount of commitment is takes is simply not something that I would be able to do. To each their own.

Word on the Street: September 3

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Neil was my first and although he definitely wasn’t the last man to go exploring my craters, for that he’ll always have a special place in my heart.”

The Moon — Seriously?

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Dammit Neil, you always had to be first didn’t you. I’ll miss you, you sumbitch.”

Buzz Aldrin — 2nd  Man on the Moon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Ohmigod, I can’t believe he’s like dead. I mean you’d think he’d be super healthy after winning all those bicycle races. #Livestrong #YOLO”

Tara Kimble — Lipgloss Enthusiast

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Now I know what you think I’m going to say. But we did in fact land on the moon. Whether or not NASA’s reason for doing so was subjugating the moon people, now that’s still up for debate.”

Gregory Barnett — Man in Tin Foil Hat

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Wow, so he made it to the moon. What an achievement. Oh, and afterwards he got to come back to Earth too? Well la-dee-fucking-dah. ”

Curiousity — Martian Rover

By Gary Lim

Petter Watch: September 3

0

Petter eats a tangerine for the first time. Enjoys it.

SFU officially approved to be in NCAA

0

By Bryan Scott
Photos by Mark Burnham
The long wait comes to an end for SFU and NCAA dreams


It took two years of membership candidacy and one year of provisional status, but Simon Fraser Athletics has been approved as a full member of the NCAA. During this time, our teams have been prohibited from competing in the national championships due to their conditional status. After entering the NCAA in 2009, they competed in the Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC) in 2010, and were granted provisional status in 2011.

As a full member of the NCAA, SFU Public Affairs and Media Relations reports that it means SFU varsity teams will be eligible to compete for NCAA championships beginning Sept. 1. It also means SFU receives voting privileges at future NCAA conventions. For Simon Fraser to get approved, the NCAA passed a recommendation to change the rules around its Canadian pilot program. The new regulations allow Canadian schools to be accepted as full members if they have been accepted as a candidate by a U.S. accrediting agency. The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) has accepted SFU as a candidate and will have to continue through the process to ensure they remain in the NCAA.

In the 2011 season, most of the teams did well in their respective sports. The Men’s Soccer team will look for a third straight GNAC title and a chance to play in the national championship for the first time. The Football team have new recruits, and have slowly improved while adjusting to the new league. Their record last year was 3–7. The Women’s Basketball team was 17–11,  but did not win their conference. They had won two straight CIS championships prior to last year. For some players, this will be their first and last chance to get a crack at an NCAA title. Others did not get to chance to compete due to eligibility or graduation.

As a whole, the University can benefit from the situation while budding relationships between the neighbouring American schools develop further. SFU can show its colours while more attention is focused on the school in the coming months. Canadians all over the country have started to notice that British Columbia has more than the mighty UBC. It is our time to step up and show them what we have to offer. The 2012-13 season will be an exciting one for the Clan, as they look to prove to everyone they are out to play and win.

I Now Pronounce You Man and Sister: Fringe’s Controversial Home Free!

0

The Vancouver International Fringe Festival brings incest and agoraphobia to the stage.

By Harleen Khangura

Fringe Festivals, known for celebrating alternative theatre, are often synonomous with descriptors like unusual, strange, and at times, risky. The Vancouver International Fringe Festival does not disappoint in presenting a melange of quirky yet compelling plays. “You get a lot of weirder fair at the Fringe than at the Arts Club or somewhere else where they have to sell a hundred tickets. There are a lot more risks taken,” says Brian Cochrane in a candid interview about Home Free!, a play that he has directed to be performed at the Vancouver Fringe Festival this fall.

Cochrane is well acquainted with the Vancouver theatre scene, as he has previously directed, produced, and acted in several plays, the most recent being King John at the Bard on the Beach Shakespeare Festival. “I wouldn’t say that I like to seek out controversy but I think that you always like something unusual,” he says. According to him, people like to remain in their comfort zone, but “we all secretly want to be pushed and prodded. We want to go to a play that will move us.” Home Free! dares to evoke a roller coaster of emotions, enough to move, and at times, perturb the audience.

In Home Free!, there are no scruples when it comes to undertaking controversial themes. The show, presented by Staircase XI Theatre Society, explores many eyebrow raising issues, perhaps the most unsettling of them all is incest. The play is one of the earliest works of American playwright Lanford Wilson. It depicts the lives of a brother and sister, Lawrence and Joanna, who live in a tiny apartment with two imaginary friends. The disturbing twist is that the siblings live like a married couple and Joanna soon gets pregnant with her brother’s baby.

To add to the tension, Lawrence suffers from severe agoraphobia and Joanna ventures to help him confront issues that he otherwise wishes to evade. According to Cochrane, the highly conflicted relationship shared between brother and sister is what makes the story click with the audience. “A lot of people have had a family relationship where you need to help someone face something. So, even though the story is set in extreme circumstances where most people would find it gross, the central core of it is very relatable,” he says.

The play also considers the choice, or in this case, the compulsion of alienating oneself from human society. The cluttered apartment/playroom that the brother and sister are sequestered to allows them to live a fantastical existence, separating them from the reality that lies outside of its thresholds. When asked what makes alienation appealing to Lawrence and Joanna, Cochrane says, “I am not sure if it is appealing. I don’t know if anyone chooses alienation. For Lawrence, there is something that he cannot face and it forces him into this extreme denial. What appeals to him about staying home and being with Joanna is that he doesn’t have to face what he doesn’t want to face. So in the play, alienation is more of a problem than a solution.”

By exploring a myriad of compelling topics, Cochrane hopes the play will urge the audience to ask questions without being overtly didactic. “I hope that people will question ‘what would I do in that situation?’ ‘Would I have done the same thing or done something differently?’ I’d rather ask a question then tell somebody something because otherwise I think that the play would be dead.” Instead of creating a passively entertaining atmosphere, the show attempts to engage the audience through thought-provoking questions.

Home Free! plays at the Vancouver International Fringe Festival from September 6 – 16.

More than words: The Acorn’s understated fare

0

The Acorn brings elegance to vegetarian dishes.

By Daryn Wright

There is a peculiar raising of stakes that occurs when waiting for a seat at a restaurant. It is hardly noticeable when the wait is short, or when the would-be diner is not very hungry. When the wait is long, however — and the diner is famished — the suspense increases exponentially with every added minute, a gastronomical Achilles-and-tortoise race that, as 15 minutes turn into 45, puts the metaphorical ball further and further into the restaurant’s court.  Can the restaurant live up to the stakes that were raised so high by the prolonged wait? At the end of the meal will the diner be impressed, or just no longer hungry?

This restaurant did much more than rid us of a negative stimulus. It caught us off guard.

It’s an overcast evening and we stand shivering outside of The Acorn, a vegetarian restaurant recently opened on Main Street and 24th. We’re told the wait will be half an hour, so we savour our sample of roasted cashews and mill about the street. The 30 minutes pass and we’re seated at the bar, still waiting for our table. Tall, narrow glasses of water are given to us as we sit and watch like hawks for a table opening. Nobody seems to want to leave. An hour passes, and we’re finally seated.

The outside is inconspicuous; a giant, roughly sketched acorn cues that you’re at the right place. The interior has the same minimalist quality: dark wood beams hem us in, white washed window frames are pushed open, and yarn-wrapped lanterns hang from the roof like the cocoons of butterflies.

The menu is simplistic and straightforward: the names of the dishes are dictated by prominent ingredients. We order the “Beet” appetizer, which is presented beautifully.  Bright beet medallions are arranged in a triangular shape, and thinly mandolin-shaved fennel adorns the center. The dish is a reimagining of ravioli: the centre of the “ravioli” is made from macadamia cheese, and the thin beet slices act as the encasement for the nutty paste.  The dish is garnished with pickled green strawberries, which are bright in flavour. We put down our forks and knives and make our detailed and eloquent judgments: “Wow.” “So good.” “Mm.”

Three entrees arrive: the Halloumi, the Harvest, and the Mushroom. The Halloumi consists of beer battered halloumi oblongs, flattened zucchini pancakes, and bright green smashed peas. The yogurt and lemon garnish cools down the whole dish, toning down the saltiness of the cheese. Everything is working in perfect harmony here, and it’s obvious that the flavours are meticulously thought out by the head chef, Brian Skinner.

The Harvest dish changes according to what produce is in season. Our version is like a splattering of paint on a white canvas: it is the most colourful dish I have ever seen. Bright red beet and goat cheese risotto acts as a bed for thinly shaved fennel and radishes, mandarin slices, basil leaves, with a poached egg sitting atop it all.

The Mushroom consists of creamed wild quinoa, seared King Oyster mushrooms, edible fuschia-coloured blooms, and pickled string beans. This dish is by far the heartiest, and is incredibly filling despite being not only completely vegetarian, but also gluten free and vegan.

Already we enter into the realm of rhetorical inflation — words like “gosh” and “dreamy” are tossed around to the point of meaninglessness. The food leaves us inarticulate; all intention of rigour is lost. What began as a meticulous readiness to review the restaurant with objectivity — with our arrangement of three people and three dishes — has turned into a primal and voracious appetite. And dessert hasn’t even come yet.

The Rhubarb demonstrates a mastery over sweet and savory combinations: black pepper strawberry sorbet sits among a short crust crumble and a rhubarb puree. The Basil is refreshing and unique; the bright green sweet basil creme brulee is accompanied by strawberry glaze, and the pairing is so perfect I wonder why I haven’t been eating this every day of my life.

What The Acorn does well is dressing up produce elegantly, without disguising it as something it is not. It is not trying to make up for its lack of meat; it is aware of being herbivorous. It is the most refined vegetarian restaurant I’ve ever experienced; presentation and experience are not threatened by constraints, rather they thrive on the vegan, gluten free, and raw alternatives.

In short: the stakes, raised high by our hunger and even higher by the wait, were more than satisfied. If only we were able to articulate it.

Smells Like Mediocrity: Yeasayer’s Fragrant World

0

After two years Yeasayer releases  a new album, miles from their folksy debut.

By Navneet Nagra

Yeasayer debuted in 2007 with All Hour Cymbals, an album of tribal drum beats and genre-shifting vocal rhythms. Next came Odd Blood; a shift from their groovy debut, Odd Blood mixed pop and electronica. A two-year break and the world became fragrant.

Fragrant World is a completely new direction for Yeasayer, straying from their folksy roots into rattling electronic beats. This jarring contrast from their previous albums leads the listener to double-take. The album single “Henrietta” starts with a cruising downbeat interspersed with an echoing, oceanic keyboard, ending in a slow crescendo. Inspired by the book Henrietta Lacks, “Henrietta” encapsulates what Yeasayer is known for with melodic lyrics and psychedelic flare matched with the dance-floor tempo Fragrant World has adopted. Though Fragrant World is not of the same caliber as All Hour Cymbals or Odd Blood, it does hint to the future we can expect from Yeasayer.

“Reagan’s Skeleton” is an unabashedly synthesizer-heavy track, calling to mind LCD Soundsystem. While All Hour Cymbals gave Yeasayer the label of psychedelic folk rock, Odd Blood refocused their sound into synth-laden dance; Fragrant World follows Odd Blood’s lead. “Folk Hero Schtick” seems to ironize the band’s past. The haunting track, while still keeping with the upbeat tempo running throughout the album, manages to demonstrate Yeasayer’s ambition. They have not attempted to savour the high of their first great single “Sunrise”; instead, they have descended into the world of mixed electronics and phantasmal percussion. Called wholly unremarkable by critics, it will probably only have a few runs on the turntable before it is put back on the shelf. Fragrant World is a good album in itself, though maybe not for the lover of

All Hour Cymbals or for the dance floor guru of Odd Blood. It meekly hits the sweet spot in between the two.

Quebec students prepare for back to school strikes

0

By Erin Hudson

Quebec students respond to being ordered back to class

 

MONTREAL (CUP) — This year’s back to school season means back to the picket lines for Quebec students as efforts to mobilize against the province’s special legislation, Law 12 (formerly the controversial Bill 78), kick into high gear.

While many students are entering their last weeks of summer, Law 12 has mandated some Quebec students to head back to class tomorrow to finish the spring term that was affected by the student strike. For some, there have been no classes since February.

The mandated return to class is viewed as a make-or-break moment for the student movement, which has been mobilizing against Quebec’s scheduled tuition hikes since they were announced in March 2011. The hikes currently proposed by the government amount to $254 per year over seven years, for a cumulative hike of $1,778 per student.

“The week of August 13 to 17 in the Montreal-area [where most of the striking CEGEPs are located] is a crucial moment for the student strike. Either the strike will be crushed by Charest’s ‘special law’ or the strike will continue,” reads the call for students to re-block classes on the web platform of the action, Bloquons la Rentree.

Under Law 12, the resumption of classes is scheduled to occur in waves throughout August beginning tomorrow. For students to be on strike, the majority of a representative body within the CEGEP or university must vote to participate in the strike.

Law 12 was introduced in the National Assembly as legislation to provide for “when and how classes are to resume and includes measures to ensure the validity of the 2012 winter and fall terms and the 2013 winter term.” The law includes clauses mandating classes for the disrupted winter semesters to resume at the 15 CEGEPs and four universities on strike as of May 18 — the date the law came into effect.

The law also includes provisions to maintain “peace, order and public security.” Provisions include the submission of an itinerary eight hours to the presiding police force in advance of any demonstration with 50 or more people in attendance. The law gives the police force the right to alter the itinerary of the demonstration so as to uphold “peace, order and public security.”

After Law 12 was passed, between 500 and 700 lawyers and legal professionals marched in protest against it in Montreal. The law was criticized by the Quebec Human Rights Commission, while the Quebec Bar has questioned its constitutionality, and Amnesty International states the law violates Canada’s international human rights obligations.

An attempt in early July to strike down provisions within the law was dismissed by the Quebec Superior Court. The presiding justice told The Montreal Gazette that Law 12 must be debated in its entirety, set to occur in September.

In anticipation of resistance to the resumption of classes, the Montreal police service, Service de police de la Ville de Montreal (SPVM), released a set of guidelines on Friday outlining how the force would apply Law 12. The SPVM states officers will not intervene in relation to Law 12 unless requested to do so by “the executives of educational institutions.”

“As I mentioned last spring, Law 12, it’s a tool. It’s one of the tools that we have. If you remember correctly, last spring we never applied Law 12 [then Bill 78]. We never had to use it,” Lafreniere said.

Other “tools” used by the SPVM thus far in the student strike include the Criminal Code and municipal bylaw P-6 — voted into effect in Montreal the same day as Law 12 — which bans the wearing of masks at demonstrations and declares illegal any assemblies of 50 people or more that do not provide an itinerary.

Lafreniere noted that officers would intervene to apply the Criminal Code if criminal acts occur during the back-to-school/strike actions.

The call to re-block classes by forming picket lines outside classrooms or school buildings comes from the Back-to-Strike Convergence which, according to their website, is looking to mobilize supporters from surrounding provinces and the USA in addition to local students.

Bloquons la Rentree and the convergence are among several groups independent of the four major student federations and are calling for students to resist the application of Law 12 starting August 13.

“As a father of two kids I would love to tell you that it’s not going to happen — that everyone is going to be safe and sound next week and we won’t have to intervene at all . . . [but] I have no clue,” said Lafreniere.

“We’ll be there, we’ll get ready for the worst, but we’ll be expecting and hoping for the best.”

University Briefs

0

Bill 78 used for the first time

 

Nineteen students at the University of Montreal are under investigation for not adhering to the controversial back-to-school law.  On the first day of school, masked protesters stormed the university causing a commotion, banging on pots and pulling fire alarms, in addition to ordering students to leave.  Macleans on Campus reported an incident in which an elderly teacher shoved back a group of demonstrators to keep them from entering his class.

 

UBC student attacked by grizzly bear

 

Julia Stafford, a 20-year-old UBC student from Seattle, Washington, was dragged six meters by a grizzly bear while she was collecting rock samples near Anchorage, Alaska.  Stafford told press that a mother bear and her two cubs surprised them while she and her team began to back away.  Before she was able to get a hold of her bear spray, the mother bear was on top of her.  She received scratches and a broken bone in her hand, which may require surgery.  

 

McGill makes history

 

 

Last Tuesday McGill’s 5,038-kg fruit salad claimed the prize of the largest in history during the orientation week at the university.  The feat beat out Fresno State University’s previous salad by around 700 pounds.  The salad was mainly comprised of 2,250 kg of watermelon, 1,012 kg of pineapple and 162 kg of strawberries.  It was fed to those there at the time, with portions sent to the school cafeteria, homeless shelters, and Meals on Wheels.

 

– Graham Cook

Quebec students prepare for back to school strikes

0

By Erin Hudson

 

Quebec students respond to being ordered back to class

 

MONTREAL (CUP) — This year’s back to school season means back to the picket lines for Quebec students as efforts to mobilize against the province’s special legislation, Law 12 (formerly the controversial Bill 78), kick into high gear.

While many students are entering their last weeks of summer, Law 12 has mandated some Quebec students to head back to class tomorrow to finish the spring term that was affected by the student strike. For some, there have been no classes since February.

The mandated return to class is viewed as a make-or-break moment for the student movement, which has been mobilizing against Quebec’s scheduled tuition hikes since they were announced in March 2011. The hikes currently proposed by the government amount to $254 per year over seven years, for a cumulative hike of $1,778 per student.

“The week of August 13—17 in the Montreal-area [where most of the striking CEGEPs are located] is a crucial moment for the student strike. Either the strike will be crushed by Charest’s ‘special law’ or the strike will continue,” reads the call for students to re-block classes on the web platform of the action, Bloquons la Rentree.

Under Law 12, the resumption of classes is scheduled to occur in waves throughout August beginning tomorrow. For students to be on strike, the majority of a representative body within the CEGEP or university must vote to participate in the strike.

Law 12 was introduced in the National Assembly as legislation to provide for “when and how classes are to resume and includes measures to ensure the validity of the 2012 winter and fall terms and the 2013 winter term.” The law includes clauses mandating classes for the disrupted winter semesters to resume at the 15 CEGEPs and four universities on strike as of May 18 — the date the law came into effect.

The law also includes provisions to maintain “peace, order and public security.” Provisions include the submission of an itinerary eight hours to the presiding police force in advance of any demonstration with 50 or more people in attendance. The law gives the police force the right to alter the itinerary of the demonstration so as to uphold “peace, order and public security.”

After Law 12 was passed, between 500 and 700 lawyers and legal professionals marched in protest against it in Montreal. The law was criticized by the Quebec Human Rights Commission, while the Quebec Bar has questioned its constitutionality, and Amnesty International states the law violates Canada’s international human rights obligations.

An attempt in early July to strike down provisions within the law was dismissed by the Quebec Superior Court. The presiding justice told The Montreal Gazette that Law 12 must be debated in its entirety, set to occur in September.

In anticipation of resistance to the resumption of classes, the Montreal police service, Service de police de la Ville de Montreal (SPVM), released a set of guidelines on Friday outlining how the force would apply Law 12. The SPVM states officers will not intervene in relation to Law 12 unless requested to do so by “the executives of educational institutions.”

“As I mentioned last spring, Law 12, it’s a tool. It’s one of the tools that we have. If you remember correctly, last spring we never applied Law 12 [then Bill 78]. We never had to use it,” Lafreniere said.

Other “tools” used by the SPVM thus far in the student strike include the Criminal Code and municipal bylaw P-6 — voted into effect in Montreal the same day as Law 12 — which bans the wearing of masks at demonstrations and declares illegal any assemblies of 50 people or more that do not provide an itinerary.

Lafreniere noted that officers would intervene to apply the Criminal Code if criminal acts occur during the back-to-school/strike actions.

The call to re-block classes by forming picket lines outside classrooms or school buildings comes from the Back-to-Strike Convergence which, according to their website, is looking to mobilize supporters from surrounding provinces and the USA in addition to local students.

Bloquons la Rentree and the convergence are among several groups independent of the four major student federations and are calling for students to resist the application of Law 12 starting August 13.

“As a father of two kids I would love to tell you that it’s not going to happen — that everyone is going to be safe and sound next week and we won’t have to intervene at all . . . [but] I have no clue,” said Lafreniere.

“We’ll be there, we’ll get ready for the worst, but we’ll be expecting and hoping for the best.”