Home Blog Page 638

World News Beat

0
Written by: Trevor Steele, Peak Associate 

 

Erdogan re-elected in Turkey

Incumbent Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Development (AK) party won a majority in both the presidential and parliamentary elections held in Turkey on June 24, though the election was considered by many to be far from a fair one. A report by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe judged that Erdogan’s opponents had been denied media coverage and that Erdogan and the AK party had misused state resources and restricted freedoms of assembly and speech. The Economist magazine describes the “New Turkey” as more Islamist, nationalist, and authoritarian.

With files from The Economist.

 

Alternatives to military service in South Korea

A new ruling by South Korea’s constitutional court requires the government to provide new forms of civil service to take the place of the previously mandatory military service. Refusal to participate in the military prior to this ruling, a decision made by hundreds of civilians on moral grounds, was a jailable offense. South Korea’s defense ministry announced that it would introduce the option of community service in facilities such as hospitals and homeless shelters as an alternative to military service. All South Korean men must complete roughly two years of service between the ages of 18 and 28.

With files from The New York Times.

 

French gangster’s brazen helicopter escape

Redoine Faid, 46, who was serving a 25-year sentence for a failed armed robbery that resulted in the death of a police officer, escaped from prison south of Paris on July 1. Three men stole a helicopter and held a pilot hostage, before forcing him to fly them to the prison where Faid was held. The men armed with assault rifles, and smoke bombs helped Faid escape via the stolen helicopter. His prison break has triggered a massive manhunt involving 3,000 police officers.

With files from Le Monde.

 

Mexico votes

Mexicans are choosing a new president, after a long and violent election campaign which saw the deaths of over 130 candidates and political workers. The frontrunner and former mayor of Mexico City Andrés Manuel López Obrador was the runner-up in the last two elections, but this time around his pledge to tackle corruption has seen him emerge as the likely winner. The incumbent president Enrique Peña Nieto has been widely criticized for corruption and poor economic growth. Obrador’s election would make him the first president from outside Mexico’s two main parties (the Institutional Revolutionary Party and the National Action Party) to be elected in nearly 100 years.

With files from BBC News.

At the PNE Amphitheatre

0
Photo courtesy of My VanCity

Written by: Michelle Gomez

Ambiance: B+

I’m at the PNE Amphitheatre for a two-day rap and hip-hop concert called Breakout Festival. While most of us can agree that there is nothing better than an outdoor concert on a warm summer evening, the weather in Vancouver is ever-changing madness and you never know what kind of day you’ll get. Luckily, the sun is shining on this particular weekend and it only rains once for about an hour.

     The music starts at 3 p.m. on both days, and while the crowd is sparse at the beginning, people eventually come streaming in as the evening progresses. Despite the occasional group of screaming 12-year-olds, the energy is high and the vibes are good.

Accessibility: A+

Considering that the venue is a large outdoor amphitheatre, there is tons of space to stand and move around, and lots of bleacher space to sit on. There are no stairs to get in and there are wheelchair-accessible bathrooms. Since most of the bathrooms are unlabeled portable toilets, they count as being gender-neutral.

Music and dancing: C

The concert tickets come with passes to Playland for the day, so my friends and I decide to go on a few rides instead of hanging around for the opening acts. We head over to the amphitheatre at around 6 p.m., when the bigger acts started playing, and at this point the sound systems are loud and the music is bumping. The headliner for day one, Tory Lanez, spends about 30 minutes crowd-surfing while his songs are still playing uninterrupted, leading me to believe that he may be lip-syncing.

     Now, picture this: it’s day two of the concert, and in 20 minutes the headliner and reason you came, Migos, is coming on. A Migos song is playing on the speaker and everyone is screaming along. The air is filled with excitement and anticipation. And then you hear it — the murmurs, the shouts of desperation, the cries of pain. People are saying Migos isn’t headlining anymore. You pull out your phone and check the event page and sure enough, they have just posted that Migos did not make it to Vancouver.

     At first, I’m disappointed, angry, and even sad, because I realize I bought my tickets from someone for cheaper, so there is no way to be refunded. Eventually, the concert-goers start to bond over their mutual anger and disappointment, and although we never get to see Migos, we make the best of the situation and dance for the remainder of the concert.  

     Overall, it’s traumatizing, and I will live with trust issues against music festivals for the rest of my life. The music is disappointing, but the energy from the crowd slightly makes up for it. Considering that a lot of the smaller acts are Vancouver-based, I will allow a passing grade for music.

Bar service and food: B

There are decent yet expensive food options, which include a number of different food trucks and Playland food before 6 p.m. The drinks are overpriced as usual, ranging from $7–10 with options such as beer, cider, Palm Bay, and highballs. Although the wait for drinks is long, the servers and staff are all friendly and smiling.

Overall grade: B-

While I highly suspect that this will be Breakout Festival’s first and last year, the PNE Amphitheatre lives on. Overall, I give this venue a B- for its spaciousness, friendly staff, and variety of snack options.

POLITICAL CORNER: Stephen Harper is set to have a meeting with John Bolton at the White House

0
Image courtesy of CTV News

Written by: Eva Zhu (Opinions Editor) & Liam Wilson (Peak Associate)

By now, we should all know that Canada and the United States are no longer besties, and are on the brink of a trade war after Trudeau moved forward with retaliation measures against the tariffs Trump put on Canadian aluminum and steel. Trump is clearly uninterested in being friendly after calling Trudeau “very dishonest and weak” and mocking him at campaign rallies. So, this begs the question: “Yo Harper, what are you doing going to the White House next week?”

According to multiple news outlets, former prime minister Stephen Harper is set to meet with Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton to discuss “Friends of Israel”, which Harper is a founding member. Harper might also meet with Larry Kudlow, Trump’s economic advisor.

I mean, anyone could’ve guessed that Harper and Trump would be good friends. Harper was practically a Republican during his time in office, with his massive corporate tax cuts, health-care cuts, and attacks on science. Additionally, press freedom under Harper suffered, dropping 10 spots to 18th place in the world ranking. However, it seems more than a little shady to arrange to meet a high-ranking official of the most controversial government of our time when you’re no longer the prime minister, no longer even in charge of the opposing party, and you haven’t notified anybody that the meeting is going to happen.

What does Harper have planned? Who knows? From all that we know so far though, everything about this meeting seems to scream “shadiness.” So Harper, just a heads-up: you might not want to get yourself into shady interactions with a controversial government whose leader is currently being criminally investigated if you want to stay investigation-free.

A tale of one-night stands

0
Illustrated by Reslus

Written by: Hannah Davis

This is an ode to the one-night stand!
To the people who’ve gone home
With some random person
And a one night break for your hand.

Ever been surprised by a condom in your hair,
Or gone to bed in a stranger’s shirt?
Has a booty call ever given you taxi fare
After losing your wallet at the Fortune concert?

Picture this: you wake at the break of dawn
You’re confused ‘cause you’re not in your bed
Unsuccessfully stifling a giant yawn,
You wish that last night you’d gone home instead.

Why is this room so unfamiliar and strange?
Oh yes! You met someone at the bar.
Sharing a flirtatious, drunken exchange,
You seduced them into a taxi car.

Remembering the night before,
Your SWEET moves on the dance floor,
The lights were bright, the music loud
Your eyes LOCKED with someone in the crowd.

You approached one another
Like a slow-motion movie scene
The space between you
was ever-decreasing.

Face-to-face, you could see each pore
And the sweat beads on their nose
They wore sandals out that night
So you could also see their toes

They remind you of a Grecian statue except
They’re drunker and not made of stone.
It was then that you realized you’d be doing
something your parents wouldn’t condone.

Of what was specifically said that night,
you can’t remember much
But somehow, (amazingly) your advances worked,
Even though your conversation flowed as such:

 

Hey

Hey

What’s your name?

What?

I said, what’s your name?

What?

I was just asking what your name is . . .

Oh, haha

Can you hear me?

*awkward nod and smile*

*reply with awkward nod and smile, glance at ceiling*

I like this song

I’ve never heard it before

Oh sorry, I interrupted you

No, you didn’t interrupt me

What?

Nevermind

Do you want to vape?

No thank you

Me neither

That’s a cool shirt

Thanks. It’s from Walmart

I get clothes from Walmart too

It’s a good place to get clothes

I agree

 

You launched your face forward
For that first, tender kiss
Your lips and faces move out of sync
You ignore that you REALLY have to piss.

When the sexual tension became way too high
You suavely said “your place or mine?”
Trying this sexy trick you read in Cosmo:
You ran ice cubes down their spine.

You flagged a taxi and hopped inside,
Then were taken to this stranger’s place
“We have to be quiet, my roommate’s home”
They tell you with a grave face.

You stumble in and they go “shhhh”
You said “I’m being as quiet as I can”.
Then you finally made it to their room
And see a GIANT poster of Anchorman.

Unnerved, you bumped your head
on the wall and let out a squeak.
The sound you made was mistook for
A pleasure-induced-orgasm shriek.

After a long and sweaty six minutes
You both collapsed, semi-fulfilled
Falling asleep, you started dreaming
Of a sexual encounter with someone skilled.

You snap out of your reverie
and come back to the present
You’ll tell your friends your night was SICK
But it was really just mostly pleasant

Next to you, your night’s lover snoozes
like an angel with a bad sinus infection:
“That person with whom
I had a brief sexual connection”

Sneaking out, you whisper farewell
Send a thank-you text for the average sex
This one-night stand met expectations
But what about the one that comes next?

The Burning House Challenge

0
Photo courtesy of Pamela Subia

By: Brendon Adam, Lyz Boyd, Kitty Cheung, Victoria Lopatka, Gabrielle McLaren, Courtney Miller, Harleen Sahota, and Pamela Subia; compiled by Gabrielle McLaren, Features Editor

If you were out for a gander on tumblr a while ago, you might have run into the Burning House Challenge. According to the website’s description of the project: “If your house was burning, what would you take with you? It’s a conflict between what’s practical, valuable and sentimental. What you would take reflects your interests, background and priorities.”

A while back, I sent an email out to my contributor list, asking them what they would save. Here are their answers.

Victoria would save this stuff if her house was on fire
Brendon would make sure to save…
What Lyz would save from a fire
Pamela’s picks
Courtney’s saves
Stuff Harleen would rescue
Gabrielle would grab…
Things Kitty wouldn’t leave behind

 

SFU public square lecture takes on the idea of a “Brown New World”

0
(Kitty Cheung / The Peak)
By: Kitty Cheung, SFU Student

 

As a means of exploring the brown perspective, Kamal Al-Solaylee presented the 2018 Milton K. Wong Multiculturalism Lecture titled “It’s a Brown New World. Now What?” on Wednesday, July 27 at the BMO Theatre Centre in downtown Vancouver. This event was hosted by SFU Public Square in partnership with the Laurier Institution, CBC Ideas, and the SFU Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue, with support from Parc Retirement Living.

     Al-Solaylee, a Toronto-based journalist, author and professor of journalism at Ryerson University, began his lecture with chilling cases of anti-brown sentiment.

     “As many as 2500 children, some as young as three months old, separated from their parents, possibly forever, at the Mexico-US border and housed in cages and camps. A young student who spent hours, days perhaps, reading websites and posts by far-right nationalist leaders, storms into a mosque in Quebec City, and fires indiscriminately, killing six men and injuring many others,” he began.

     Al-Solaylee, a Toronto-based journalist, author, and professor of journalism at Ryerson University, recited his definition of brown as “a continuum, a grouping, a metaphor even, for the millions of darker-skinned people who, in broader historical terms, have missed out on the economic and political gains of the post-industrial world, who are now clamouring for their fair share of social nobility, equality, and freedom.”

     This lecture focused on revealing the narrative on how we are living race-wise today, what it means to be brown, and why being brown matters, especially in a world where immigrants and asylum seekers are dehumanized by US and UK political leaders. 

     Al-Solaylee presented research from his book, Brown: What Being Brown in the World Today Means (to Everyone), a collection of interviews conducted with brown immigrants and workers, as well as personal accounts of his experience growing up as a gay man in Yemen. He focused on two aspects of anti-brownness in particular: how “brown has become the source of cheap labour,” and “the colourization of Islam as a brown menace in the post-911 world.”

     The lecture was followed by a dialogue moderated by Michelle Eliot, a journalist with CBC Radio One. Audience members had the opportunity to ask questions as volunteers passed microphones around the room.  

     The term “brown” is a racial identity encompassing a plethora of individual cultures and countries. When asked about the value of coming together as brown, Al-Solaylee discussed identifying with brownness as a way of developing solidarity, creating a common narrative of labour and exploitation, and destabilizing the concept of a model minority.

     In response to the question of what the role of white allyship is in supporting brown communities, Al-Solaylee stressed the importance of everyone being vocal.

“Something I’m really tired of doing is — and every person of colour is tired — that they’re the only ones who are vocal about issues of discrimination and race [. . .] I need everyone here [. . .] to be the ones who are vocal about race and racism.” – Kamal Al-Solaylee, journalist and author 

     “My ideal sort of scenario is not to be the person always writing about race. I started as a journalist, as an arts writer [. . .] I was a theatre critic and I sometimes long for those days when all I did was just go and write about a performance, about some one-man show and not have to constantly perform my skin colour, constantly tell you, constantly have to convince you that you need to step up and you need to prevent the kind of violence that might lead to a genocide,” he said.

     The final audience question of the night had to do with being tokenized as a brown-skinned person, with Al-Solaylee responding to “What can we do?”

     Al-Solaylee commented that he didn’t feel his role as an author was “to provide solutions, but [rather] to tell stories, to expose the narrative or to just kind of say this is going on and then I leave it to policy makers and people who are working in the field to strategize.” He continued, ”I have found more recently that I need to be more activist [. . .] I need to lend my voice to issues.

     “The experience of racialization is not necessarily going to change in a generation or two.”

 

With files from The Star and The Globe and Mail.

 

 

How to pick up girls in the gym

0
Illustrated by Emma Wu

Written by: Victoria Lopatka

  1.      Dress for success. Rip the sleeves off your T-shirt, and pair some oversized basketball shorts with overpriced basketball sneakers (even though you haven’t picked up a basketball since grade 10 gym class).
  2.      Once in the gym, pick a target — yes, we refer to girls as “targets” now. You’re going to want to pick a girl — I mean, target — who’s alone, because if she has too many friends, she won’t have any time to hang out with you, y’know? Also, pick a girl that looks really busy. Girls — I mean targets — love being interrupted when they’re doing stuff because it makes you look really bold. Like, look at this guy who came over and interrupted me working out. He must have something really important to say.
  3.      Show off around her. A good way to get a girl’s attention is to lift weights in her general area and make lots of “I’m working really hard; this weight is heavy” sounds. When you grunt like a pig in heat, an animalistic part of her brain will respond and be super turned on. Bonus if you’re sweating profusely and releasing pheromones.
  4.      Lead with a strong opening line. My personal favourite is grunting “Snapchat” and gesturing towards her phone. Long, eloquent, and clever pick-up lines are for guys who don’t have any game.
  5.      If she doesn’t respond to your opening line, get all up in her business. She’s probably stunned that youyou god, you — would actually speak to her, so take this opportunity to show off how big you are in relation to her petite stature. Flex your biceps or something. When people get really close together, they kiss, right? So, if you get up in her personal space, she’ll start thinking about kissing.
  6.      If she’s still too stunned to respond, try playfully taking away her phone. You can create a little game of “keep away.” Girls love having their valuables taken away and tossed around carelessly. It sends the message that you’re a risk-taker — a man on the edge.
  7.      Now, at this point you’ve either sealed the deal or there’s a tiny chance you may be rejected. If rejected, you have two options: write her off as dumb, ugly, and fat, or try even harder. Targets — ahem, girls — love playing hard to get, so there’s a 99% chance her rejection is just an invitation for you to try again, and again, and again. Why wouldn’t anyone want you, you handsome beast?
  8.      If everyone is staring at you in the gym, remember it’s because they’re either jealous, interested or observing your smooth moves.
  9.      If she has a friend, repeat your technique with the friend in front of the first girl. She’ll probably get jealous and want you back.
  10.  Use your entire workout time staring at and hitting on girls, then lift a five-pound weight a few times and leave. If you didn’t get any phone numbers, there’s always tomorrow. You got this, tiger.

 

Director’s Spotlight: Lynne Ramsay

0
Photo courtesy of Andreas Rentz

Written by: Kate Olivares

I know what you’re probably thinking: who?

     With her most recent feature You Were Never Really Here (2017) opening in limited theatres, conversation on writer-director Lynne Ramsay’s impressive filmography remains woefully meager. Amidst the cultural phenomenon that is Avengers: Infinity War, allow me to push up my horn-rimmed glasses to discuss the acclaimed Glaswegian filmmaker.

     There lies a very basic divide between movie genres: prestigious interpretivism and escapist blockbuster. Despite the pretension and exclusivity associated with art-house works, the centre of humanity in all of Ramsay’s films is invaluable. Ramsay’s cinematic style centres around two aspects which grant it provocative timelessness: detail and specificity. Her films rarely focus on plot, thereby achieving an incredible balancing act between complexity and restraint. Her characters are enriched by her details and the incredible performances she elicits from her actors.

     We Need to Talk About Kevin, her most well-known work about a mother and her sociopathic son, illustrates this. Her affinity for tight frames and unsettling symmetrical composition effectively balances Eva Khatchadourian’s (Tilda Swinton’s) neutral expression of dread. This achieves a lasting feeling of voyeurism from both other characters and the audience, building a sense of discomfort and tension leading up to its horrifying climax. In every instance, she focuses on details and relies on them to tell the story, rather than relying on exposition.

      She uses a similar technique throughout her short films, such as Small Deaths (1996) and Gasman (1998). In fact, their condensed nature makes the effect all the more salient. In the world of Ramsay, a flick of the wrist or a can of tomato soup can reveal the entire being of a character. By watching her work, you are invited to ponder, digest, and most importantly, observe. What do you see? How does that make you feel?

The retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy jeopardizes the future of progressive America

0
Image courtesy of Eric Thayer/Getty Images

Written by: Eva Zhu, Opinions Editor

Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Anthony Kennedy, 81, will be retiring on July 31, after 30 years. Although he is a Republican appointed by former president Ronald Reagan, and was unreliable on many issues, he did hold more liberal views regarding some things, including abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and Obamacare. His retirement could possibly end progressive America as we know it.

In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Kennedy cast the swing vote needed to uphold the clauses affirmed by Roe v. Wade (1973), which gave women full autonomy during the first trimester of the pregnancy. This allowed the right to abortion to be protected under the Fourteenth Amendment. If Kennedy hadn’t been there to save the day, married women would have needed their husbands’ approval to obtain abortions.

Kennedy believed that the right to marry should be held as a fundamental liberty for everyone and was one of the only conservatives in SCOTUS to wholeheartedly support and champion gay marriage. He authored the majority ruling for landmark LGBTQ+ rulings Romer v. Evans (1996), Lawrence v. Texas (2003), Windsor v. the United States (2013), and the 2015 case Obergefell v. Hodges to legalize gay marriage. In the issued ruling on Obergefell v. Hodges, he said:

“It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves . . . They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”

Without a doubt, this is his greatest legacy. Without him, Americans would still be fighting for the right to marry who they love.

In June of 2012, Kennedy graced the cover of TIME, aptly named on the cover as “The Decider,” as he often broke the 4–4 tie reached by the other eight justices.

In the wake of Kennedy’s impending retirement, President Donald Trump is promising “to pick one that’s going to be there for 40 years, 45 years.” If his previous SCOTUS pick Neil Gorsuch is anything to judge by, America is going to be in deep shit. During his confirmation hearing, he was unable to provide sufficient answers to any of the questions posed by US Senators. Nevertheless, he was voted in 54–45. In true conservative fashion, Gorsuch has voted for the Muslim ban, in favour of the homophobic Colorado baker, against abortion rights, and against union fees. 

Americans should definitely be scared for the future, especially if Trump’s SCOTUS pick gets voted into the empty seat by Senate. If Mitch McConnell keeps the promise he made in 2016 to delay the vote until after the midterm elections in November, then we might not have to be as afraid. If not, then we can expect a 5–4 conservative to liberal ruling on cases regarding LGBTQ+ rights, abortions, challenges to capital punishment, and race-based affirmative action.

If Trump’s next SCOTUS pick is confirmed into office, then Americans should start shining their battle armour. The United States will no longer have Kennedy to cast swing votes, which could very well mean the end of Roe v. Wade in the next year or two.

One of Trump’s campaign promises was to overturn the ruling. Once overturned, women in 22 states will lose their right to an abortion. That’s the worst-case scenario. The best-case scenario would be for every state to legalize “no questions asked” abortion, but this is Trump’s America we’re talking about. The most likely scenario, as Huffington Post points out, is that Republicans probably won’t overturn Roe v. Wade entirely, but may pass a 20-week ban in all states.

We can also expect future rulings to favour religious freedom over the well-being of the LGBTQ+ community. Down the line, homophobic bakers might become the least of our worries.

If Senate approves Trump’s next SCOTUS pick after the untimely retirement of Anthony Kennedy, then the lives of American citizens will be put in danger — especially women, incarcerated populations, and those in the LGBTQ+ community — and progressiveness will only exist as a minority in the Supreme Court for decades to come.

Police warn residents in and around Vancouver about Canadian Revenue Agency scammers

0
(Chris Ho / The Peak)
By: Srijani Datta, Assistant News Editor

 

Residents of Metro Vancouver and adjoining areas, including SFU students, are being warned by police forces about Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) scams as people in different cities are being targeted. Earlier this month, an individual from Vancouver got duped into paying $2,000, and there have been similar reports from Surrey and neighboring areas.

     An individual from Surrey who fell victim to the scam lost $18,000. The individual is described to have received a telephone call from a male and female scammer, telling the victim that there was an arrest warrant against them, which could be settled only if the victim paid. The victim reportedly, frightened by the threat of arrest, bought Bitcoins and sent them to the con artists.

     Earlier in June, Vancouverite Kelly Loden was defrauded out of $2,000. Loden was told he was being audited.

     “They had financial information against me that made me believe them,” said Loden. “They knew what years I’d filed taxes personally, versus with an accountant.”

     The con artists also posed as officers from the Vancouver Police Department and gave him a name, rank, and badge number, informing him that a warrant had been issued in his name.

     “My self-guilt of just owing tax money to CRA let me be led astray and scammed. I’d already been ignoring it for two years.”

     While Loden accepted that his own guilt of owing taxes made him more vulnerable to the scam, RCMP authorities said that lack of awareness about CRA protocols and tax collection procedures make people easily targetable.

    The International Students Services of SFU provides monthly reminders to SFU students to beware of similar scams. Some members of the student community told The Peak that they have received multiple calls of similar nature, over the last few months.

     Mehvish Saleem, an SFU student studying for a master’s degree in Big Data, joined SFU as an international student only a few short months ago. Saleem told The Peak that “scared by the sudden and threatening nature of the call, and unaware of tax collection procedures in Canada, I almost fell prey to the fraud.” It was because her call connection was lost suddenly, and once she called back she heard the exact same message being played to her again from the start, that she realized it was a scam.

     “People can be vulnerable to this type of scam when they are unsure of how taxes are collected in Canada,” said corporal Elenore Sturko of Surrey RCMP. “We want to share important information about tax collection and to assure the public that they will not be threatened as part of the tax collection process.”

     A step-by-step guide to the different ways the scammers try to deceive people, have been included in the Government of Canada website, under the tab of Canada Revenue Agency’s Security option. Police forces and RCMP have informed the public that CRA will not contact them via phone for any reason or send officers to arrest them at their doors.

With files from CBC News.