Home Blog Page 283

Minutes – December 16, 2019

0

Peak Publications Society Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
December 16, 2019
Peak Offices

Chair: Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam

In Attendance
Le (Yuri) Zhou (Board Secretary, non-voting)
Kelly Chia (Employee Members Representative)
Natasha Tar (Collective Member Representative)
Pablo Clairmont (At-Large Representative)
Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam (At-Large Representative)
Gabrielle McLaren (Editor-in-Chief)
Gurpreet Kambo (Guest)
Kitty Cheung (Guest)

Agenda

Call to Order
11:11 am

Approval of Agenda
Pablo / Natasha
All in favour Approval of Past Minutes from November 18, 2019
Natasha / Pablo
All in favour
Updated financials
Yuri to present

Budget of Spring 2020
Yuri to present

Membership report
Yuri to present

Update on Disciplinary Policy
BIRT, talk about on Jan meeting.

Assistant News Editor position, Spring 2020
Gurpreet to present
Edit working hours from 15 to 14 on job description
Kelly / Natasha
All in favour

SFPIRG Training Discussion
Members application notice, online & print, ind. at pitch email at the beginning of semester.
Looking a rule of order _ Natasha helps
Exit report of director.

Break 12:21-12:30
In Camera

Update on employee time off pay & EIC inter-semester pay
Gabrielle to present

EIC Updates
Gabrielle to present

Adjournment
1:36pm

Minutes – November 18, 2019

0

Peak Publications Society Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
November 18, 2019
Peak Offices

Chair: Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam

In Attendance
Le (Yuri) Zhou (Board Secretary, non-voting)
Kelly Chia (Employee Members Representative)
Natasha Tar (Collective Member Representative)
Pablo Clairmont (At-Large Representative)
Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam (At-Large Representative)
Gabrielle McLaren (Editor-in-Chief)

Agenda

Call to Order
11:20am

Approval of Agenda
Natasha, Pablo
All in favour

Approval of Past Minutes from October 21, 2019
Pablo, Natasha
All in favour

Updated financials
Yuri to present

Membership report
Yuri to present
34 members

Update on employee time off pay
Bahar to present
We don’t pay time off for employees who did not do their work.
Written version for taking off or leave early on Friday _ Gabrielle does a draft

Update on EIC Hiring and Disciplinary Policy
Draft is done and need to be approved by the board remotely.
BIRT, in the processing.

Update on the Burnaby and Vancouver campus distribution stands
Surrey campus: is good for now.
Vancouver campus: could add one at Harbour centre table area.
Burnaby campus: could add one at lib, the study, (BIRT). Kelly and Gabrielle help

Board Chair Updates
Bahar to lead a conversation
Motion to approve
Kelly, Pablo

  1. Adjournment
    12:47pm

 

 

Minutes – October 21, 2019

0

Peak Publications Society Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
October 21, 2019
Peak Offices

Chair: Natasha Tar

In Attendance
Le (Yuri) Zhou (Board Secretary, non-voting)
Zach Siddiqui (Employee Members Representative)
Natasha Tar (Collective Member Representative / Chair)
Pablo Clairmont (At-Large Representative)
Gabrielle McLaren (Editor-in-Chief)
Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam (At-Large Representative)
Guests:
Kelly Chia
Grupreet Kambo

Agenda

  1. Call to Order
    11:44am

  2. Approval of Agenda
    Pablo / Bahar
    All in favour

  3. Approval of Past Minutes from September 12th, 2019
    Pablo / Bahar
    All in favour
  4. Appointment of new Board Chair
    Motion Bahar to be the next board chair by Pablo / Zach

  5. Appointment of new Employee Representative & Collective Representative
    Motion Kelly Chia to be next Employee Rep. by Pablo / Bahar
    Motion Natasha by Pablo / Kelly to be next collective Rep.

  6. Updated financials
    Yuri to present

  7. Membership report
    Yuri to present
    34 members

  8. EIC updates
    Staff updates
    Employee time off pay – Bahar does research and discuss on next meeting.

  9. Discussion on board training from SFPIRG
    Yuri to present
    Approved and gather time availability for this training.

  10. Update on Disciplinary Policy & EIC hiring policy
    Natasha to present
    Gabrielle, Natasha and Bahar will work on disciplinary policy.
    Double check this policy and final pass at next meeting.

  11. Discussion on the status of Burnaby and Vancouver campus distribution stands
    Natasha, Yuri, and Gabrielle to present
    Ask distribution to fill up the spreadsheet on stands status and conditions, then board will do the further discussion at next meeting.

  12. Adjournment

12:47pm

 

Minutes from September 12, 2019

0

Peak Publications Society Board of Directors Meeting Agenda
September 12, 2019
Peak Offices

Chair: Natasha Tar

In Attendance
Le (Yuri) Zhou (Board Secretary, non-voting)
Zach Siddiqui (Employee Members Representative)
Natasha Tar (Collective Members Representative / Chair)
Pablo Clairmont (At-Large Representative)
Kierra Enns (At-Large Representative)
Gabrielle McLaren (Editor-in-Chief)
Bahar Vaghari Moghaddam (At-Large Representative)
Marissa Ouyang (Guest)

Agenda

  1. Call to Order
    12:07pm

  2. Approval of Agenda
    Kierra / Pablo
    All in favour

  3. Approval of Past Minutes from August 15th, 2019
    Kierra / Pablo
    All in favour

  4. Updated financials
    Yuri to present

  5. Membership report
    Yuri to present 32 members. AGM 2019 will be held on Oct 16 Wed from 1:30 -2:30pm. Notice
    will be sent to all signed members by the end of Sept.

  6. Continued discussion on proposal to pay editors for writing outside of their sections
    Open discussion
    Motion by Zach / Pablo
    All in favour
    Vote to pass this proposal with edits (full pay for articles, EIC discretion, check-ins between editors, writers, and the EIC) on the condition that the EIC will report on its success at the end of the semester by Zach / Pablo
    Yes: 5 No: 0 Abstentions: 0
    Vote passes
    Pay will start from week 5 fall, 2019.

  7. Reviewing Marissa’s Illustration Editor Proposal
    Marissa to lead the discussion
    Change system (deadlines earlier, editors will potentially fill out forms for illustration to help
    for now. See if we have the budget in the future for this new position.

  8. Discussing the Board’s role in disciplinary action at The Peak and the potential
    creation of a disciplinary policy
    Open discussion
    Make a new policy, policy drafting team to be decided over group chat.

  9. Discussing disclosing Board minutes to the public
    Open discussion
    Agreed to post minutes on web after they are approved

  10. Adjournment
    2:01pm

When it comes to Vancouver’s comedy scene, it’s no laughing matter

0
An empty stage in an empty room with orangey-red mood lighting.
Stand-up comedy spots are quickly disappearing. Photo: Brands&People / Unsplash

By: Craig Allan, Peak Associate

In 2017, I did stand-up comedy for the first time. After seeing comedians performing in front of audiences — on stages that I had no idea existed — I knew it was something I wanted to do. In less than a month, I got my jokes together and found a venue (Yuk Yuk’s). My first set received some solid reactions from the after midnight, mostly drunk crowd. Wanting to perform more, I made a plan for where I wanted this newfound interest to go.

However, by April 2019 that dream died, as The Comedy Mix announced it was closing. The Mix, which is currently looking for a new location, was one of the largest dedicated comedy venues in the downtown core. Its fall is indicative of a problem with comedy not just in the city, but the entire Lower Mainland. Vancouver is losing its funny backbone.

Comedy may not seem as valuable as a play or concert, but it’s an important artform. Apart from its entertainment value, humor is an effective tool for promoting social change. Humour helps us discuss and debate with others on an emotional level using a “nuanced social tone” that keeps listeners engaged. It’s for this reason that the role of humor in activism, for example, should not be underestimated.

Before the pandemic, I used to love going to comedy shows. To be able to sit down and hear jokes from people with various backgrounds and experiences was some of the most fun you could have in this city. The highlight of Vancouver’s comedy scene was the surprise celebrity appearances. Because so many movies and TV shows are filmed around the Lower Mainland, major comedic acts would sometimes stop by the clubs to test out their jokes. I remember one night going to The Comedy Mix and seeing a surprise set from Damon Wayans Jr. — you can’t have that kind of experience in every city. Often viewed as being a “No Fun City,” Vancouver’s comedy scene was never very big to begin with. There are only a handful of dedicated comedy venues, like Comedy After Dark, left in the city.

The pandemic no doubt has had an effect, as seen with the closure of places like Yuk Yuk’s (Cambie St. location) and Kino Café. But evidence shows that this decline was happening before the pandemic started. The Comedy Mix and Foxhole Comedy ceased performances in the months before COVID-19 hit. Another location, Little Mountain Gallery (LMG), closed because of the enemy of every artistic venue — redevelopment.

I don’t know if I will ever have my comedy dream realized in this city, but I think others should have the opportunity. It is my hope that, when this pandemic is over, the comedy scene will rebound. That will only happen if city management gets involved by actively supporting more venues than its largest mainstream stages, and maybe even mandating a few newer developments to have a comedy stage. Individually, we can make efforts to attend and participate in comedy nights — showing city planners that Vancouver’s comedy scene is still alive, and is deserving of support.

This is a problem with not just the comedy scene, but in every Vancouver-based entertainment venture; from nightclubs to music venues. Many leases are too expensive, and the affordable places are often in the shadow of the wrecking ball. Sure, some arts and culture venues — like the Rio Theatre — have been able to fight for and win building ownership, but many others are not as successful. In a Vancouver Magazine piece on the closure of LMG, Stacey McLachlan, said when it comes to arts and culture in Vancouver, it’s the big, flashy venues like ballet and music halls that get all the attention, while little places like LMG tend to get lost. In a city with an abundance of movie theatres, performance art venues, and even strip clubs, we need to remember that comedy is just as important — and local comedy stages are crucial in sustaining this community.

SFU Burnaby is doomed to always be a commuter campus

0
A photo of one of the bus stops at SFU. A bus is pulled up beside it. It looks like a nice day.
Go to class, go home, and very little else. Photo: Sarah Kushneryk / The Peak

By: Craig Allan, Peak Associate

In 1963, after achieving formal assent in the BC Legislature, Dr. Gordon M. Shrum, first chancellor of SFU, decided that the best place for the new SFU would be atop Burnaby Mountain, ensuring two things: that we’d have beautiful views, and that that’s about all we’d ever get. Being built on a mountain guarantees no matter how hard student groups and administration try, SFU will always be a commuter campus.

A commuter campus is one in which the majority of students live elsewhere. Though SFU offers student housing, it can only accommodate 1,500 students; much less than the 30,000 that attend the school. This generally results in students heading home after their classes are done. SFU at 1:00 p.m. and SFU at 8:00 p.m. are vastly different places because of this. UniverCity, the mountain’s supposed commercial district, is most often characterized by people rushing to complete their errands in between classes, and the SUB seems more like a place to burn time in between classes than to actually hang out.

This is in part due to how SFU’s expansion is limited by its location. Not only is it at the top of a mountain where construction is forced to contend with uneven land and higher material shipping costs, but Burnaby Mountain in particular is a conservation area. This means that development is restricted to what space at the top has already been deforested. Moreso than other universities, SFU is limited in the ways it can expand, often requiring decisions between one amenity and another: we can build more housing, food options, or social spaces — but all three might not be feasible.

Under a traditional university infrastructure model, SFU’s Burnaby campus has been described as an acquired taste. But by opening spaces for students to use as needed, we might be able to move past this label. By using the resources available, and by adapting to the current climate, we could make Burnaby campus a place the people actually want to stay at. Maybe then, we’d be able to make our first strides away from being a commuter campus.

Dear Doctors: Not everyone is a (cis) male

0
A woman has her hands over her uterus, signalling pain. The photo is cropped so as to not include her head, or below mid-thigh.
Human anatomy — and its afflictions — extend beyond that of a cis male. Photo: Cottonbro / Pexels

By: Hannah Kazemi, Peak Associate

After seeing a dermatologist, an endocrinologist, and enduring three months of blood tests and ultrasounds, I was diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). PCOS is a common hormonal condition that affects the internal reproductive system and menstrual cycle, and also puts those affected at a higher risk for other health issues such as diabetes and infertility.

I was lucky to have been diagnosed with PCOS at the age of 20 — most people who have PCOS don’t actually get their diagnosis until they’re in their late 20s or even their 30s, after they try and fail to conceive for the first time. Over 50% of cases of PCOS go undiagnosed because symptoms are disregarded as insignificant or exaggerated, and many cases of PCOS are misdiagnosed as something else. There are many illnesses specific to those with internal reproductive systems which contain ovaries or uteri. These can have similar symptoms, requiring extensive testing to differentiate, and yet many people are sent home with instructions to take Advil for the pain and hope that it gets better. We’re told to just deal with it, lacking resources and education on the issues that are plaguing our own bodies.

Healthcare presents many difficulties for people who don’t fit a narrow identity. Women, trans and non-binary people, and POC regularly face worse results than white men when accessing healthcare — if it’s even accessible in the first place.

Often, issues with uteri and ovaries are not discussed or seen as “important” enough to be taught, so going to see a doctor who isn’t well-versed in this area can prove to be more frustrating and disheartening than it is helpful. Advocating for yourself shouldn’t be this difficult; people with uteri shouldn’t feel afraid to express concerns to a doctor — they should feel confident that their worries will be addressed and taken seriously.

Medicine is an area that is historically male-dominated; not just in the way of doctors and medical school professors, but also in the study of health and the body. The White Male has perpetually been the standard and main focus of study, leading to a severe lack of research for any other identity. This has been going on for centuries, and is rooted in the idea that cis men are biologically superior.

Healthcare is a system built by men for men that has painted women as “hysterical” people with the idea that their problems aren’t real and don’t need to be addressed. When people with uteri are constantly dismissed by doctors because they’re made to believe their symptoms aren’t as bad as they say they are, that can take a toll on mental health. If medical schools aren’t teaching about these things, how are patients supposed to get the right support and treatment when they need it?

This level of medical care isn’t good enough. So why is it the standard?

What grinds our gears: A lack of campus study spaces

0
A study room, as described in the piece. The table is broad, and a window looks out from the side of the room.
Rooms like this one scatter the library, but are often booked or inaccessible. Photo: Jacob Mattie / The Peak

By: Craig Allan, Peak Associate; Jacob Mattie, Opinions Editor

As a student whose home has more distractions than it does workspace, I usually come to school to get my work done. My favourite place to work at the SFU Burnaby campus is the fifth floor of the library. It has these cozy little enclave desks that you can set up in, and work in what feels like your own private space. However, recently I found one of the study rooms on that same fifth floor with an unlocked door; containing the study area of my dreams. A private room with actual windows! Such a space is much better than a boxed-in desk. Of course, it’s not for my use, as these rooms are reserved for graduate students.

But this got me thinking. Why is it so hard to find a good study spot? SFU has well over 20,000 undergraduate students alone, and nowhere near as many desks. If they’re forcing us to return to in-person classes, it’s only right that we have somewhere to actually work. Burnaby campus is often packed, and finding a peaceful space is difficult enough without having to worry about social distancing. Surrey and Vancouver campuses aren’t better. The Surrey Library won’t even book study rooms to single students!

For all the time SFU encourages us to study, they really should offer us some facilities in which to do so.

Anything can be a kink if you believe in yourself

0
A photo of someone from behind. They are wearing handcuffs, and their jacket is pulled up to reveal zebra-striped underwear.
Kinks can be as elaborate or as simple as you can imagine. Photo: Pars Sahin / Unsplash

By: Jacob Mattie, Opinions Editor

There’s no kink police — unless you’re into that.

Roughly, a kink can be described as an unconventional sex behaviour, and there is little further clarification. The result of this is that anything you enjoy — be that citrus fruits, avoiding your responsibilities, or thrift shopping — can become a kink. All it takes is a little creativity and the involvement of sexuality.

The most familiar kinks fall under the umbrella of BDSM: Bondage/Discipline (or Domination) /Sadism (or Submission)/Masochism. It’s from here that the images of a sex dungeon arise; full-body leather suits, riding crops, and wall-mounted anchors are most common under the BDSM term. But such conspicuous styling has caught the eye of popular media, and has really blown things out of proportion. The vast majority of kinks are more mundane, and are shockingly common — with about a third of people reporting some experience with sexual creativity.

I don’t think the statistics are as clean as that. A kink like sensory deprivation can be taken to an extreme with things like blindfolds and noise-cancelling headphones, but has its roots in something as accessible as closing your eyes. If you find yourself closing your eyes during intimate moments, then congratulations! — you’ve made a foray into the world of kinks.

Spanking falls under the terms of sadism/masochism, and even labels as consistently exaggerated as domination/submission can manifest in a relationship dynamic as mundane as one partner consistently being the one to choose what film to watch during your movie nights, or which restaurant to eat at.

So great — we’re all kinky to some extent. But how does this relate to getting off in a thrift shop? That’s skipping a few steps, but the motivation behind a kink is a collection of actions or circumstances that make sex more pleasurable. Pleasure and sex are inherently subjective terms, and so all that’s needed is a way to combine them. Do you think it might be fun to find a cute outfit at a thrift shop and seduce your partner with it? That could be defined as a mix of roleplay and dressplay — similar to what motivates lingerie — or you could forego the labels entirely. Have fun with it! There are no gatekeepers to sexuality, so get creative with what you’re into.

I won’t go into detail about all the ways you could use citrus fruits, but if you end up getting arrested for public indecency — well hey. Handcuffs are great for bondage. Keep up the communication and have fun out there.

Philanthropy isn’t the golden ideal we might picture it to be

0
An aged white man in a suit sits in front of a laptop. He is staring at the camera, and is fanning out a large number of bills in his hand.
Philanthropy is an easy way for the wealthy to mold their surroundings however they feel is best. Photo: Andrea Piacquadio / Pexels

By: Craig Allan, Peak Associate; Jacob Mattie, Opinions Editor

SFU’s business school goes by the name Beedie School of Business. It would be reasonable to assume Beedie is the name of a faculty member; similar to how the Maggie Benston Centre and Robert C. Brown Hall are named after former faculty of SFU. However, the school is named after Ryan and Keith Beedie, two former students. The reason their names adorn the program is because they gave a $22 million dollar “gift” — the largest in the school’s history. It came attached with the request that the school of business be renamed in their honour. This is the nature of philanthropy: while it signals that the wealthy are giving back to the community, there are often ulterior motives such as legacy preservation (and consequently advertisement) and tax evasion.

In Vancouver, the Carnegie Library in East Vancouver got its name from Arthur Carnegie, a New York City industrialist and known philanthropist. He believed only a few select people were entitled to wealth, and so he underpaid his workers, many of them children. Under his assumption that concentrated wealth — at the expense of his employees — was the best for development, buildings with his name were the true showing of his “guiding hand” to progress. Much like how “benevolent donations” changed how people perceived the Carnegie name, philanthropy was also used to soften the image of some of history’s most awful people. People like former Cincinnati Reds owner and noted racist Marge Schott, and the Sackler family — heads of Purdue Pharma and Pfizer — who are the main culprits of the opioid epidemic.

The problem with much philanthropy is that it is tax deductible. This means that money that could have gone to helping the houseless, or bringing down student debt were instead spent at the whims of the rich. Certainly, libraries and concert halls have value, but not enough to replace such things as social wellness programs.

Of course, philanthropy in and of itself is not always a bad thing. It can fund worthwhile causes which may not be on the radar of most people. However, the nature of philanthropy is that it gives even more influence to the rich. The layouts of museums, dorm rooms, and other social structures affect how we live, and how we establish our behavioural routines. When these are set by the wealthy — who have a vested interest in promoting or discouraging certain behaviours — this can become deeply problematic.

The issues inherent in capitalism are broad and complex, and will take a concerted effort to overcome. However, it’s important to realize that philanthropy is not helping. Rather than moving us towards a society in which we can all meet our basic needs, it affixes the role of the wealthy as our benefactors.