Home Blog Page 1410

Penny for your thoughts

0

What to consider before giving change to the homeless in Vancouver

By Kelly Thoreson

 

“Panhandling isn’t a very lucrative career,” Thomas explained as we sipped warm coffees outside the entrance to Insite, the Downtown Eastside’s supervised injection site. “Well, for me it wasn’t very lucrative — probably because I was never very good at it.”

It is difficult to walk through Vancouver without encountering someone in need of some spare change. Whether they are sitting at a corner with a grimy cardboard sign, or whether they approach you with an empty coffee cup, people in need of a few spare coins seem to be a bit of a fixture in Vancouver.

There is a lot to consider when giving out spare change, and people are often confused, indecisive, or impulsive regarding the matter. First, you have to determine whether you actually have spare change and how much you could potentially hand over. Do you set a standard amount for every person? Or is it on a case-by-case basis? Next you ask yourself whether they actually need the money, and you judge what you believe they are going to do with the money. If you do give money to this person, can you refuse to give change to anyone else throughout the day? With all of this to consider, it would be easy to give up and simply decide to never give change away.

 

Thomas once worked as an executive in Vancouver; however, after being diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) — which Thomas described to me as “holes in the brain” — he wasn’t able to continue work in his executive position. He tried a number of career paths, such as a mechanic, in order to make ends meet. Now Thomas spends his days wheeling around the Downtown Eastside, and he spends his nights sleeping at the Union Gospel Mission’s housing program.

Before he became homeless himself, Thomas encountered panhandlers in Vancouver on a regular basis. “When I was working as an executive, I didn’t like giving out change,” he admitted. Laughing, he said, “I love socialism, but I don’t like giving my change away.” He explained that he thinks panhandlers should understand that nobody is obligated to give them change, and they should be thankful for whatever they do receive. “I think that most panhandlers around here understand that,” Thomas said. “Some of the younger ones, though, they might not understand that is how it works yet.”

“I love socialism, but I don’t like giving my change away.” – Thomas, DTES resident

There are a number of stereotypes about the homeless that discourage people from handing out change. A common misconception is that panhandlers are asking for change because they are lazy, and people don’t want to part with their hard-earned cash in order to fuel someone else’s laziness. This is a stereotype that most people who work within homeless communities would be eager to argue against. Brittni Arthur, a student at Columbia Bible College who has volunteered in the Downtown Eastside and worked in the Tenderloin in San Francisco, admits that she believed this stereotype before working with the homeless herself. “I thought that they got themselves there and so they should get some self-motivation and get themselves out,” she said. “But it’s really not that simple.” For instance, many of the people who live in the Downtown Eastside are like Thomas and face a mental or chronic illness that makes it difficult or impossible for them to work or live on their own. Rachelle Schellenberg — who works in the Downtown Eastside with women with backgrounds of sexual exploitation and mental illness — also points to the fact that many of the homeless come from abusive backgrounds. In fact, the City of Vancouver’s 2011 Housing and Homelessness Strategy reported that 50 to 70 per cent of Vancouver’s homeless have suffered some sort of trauma and that nearly 50 per cent have been in government care such as a foster home during their lifetime. Schellenberg explains that this kind of a background can lead to addictions. “There is a root to that problem [of substance abuse and addictions]. They are addicted because they are self-medicating.” Thomas also admitted that he fell into a period of addiction a number of years ago, but he has since been clean.

The prevalence of addiction in the homeless community is a major rationale for people who don’t give money to panhandlers: they don’t want to fuel an addiction. “I would never hand out money because, even though intentions might be the best, a lot of the time once people get that money in their hands, it becomes too big of a temptation to go back to their habit,” Arthur said, explaining that she would prefer to buy a meal or bus tickets for someone in need. Schellenberg, on the other hand, said that she would rather give people the opportunity to make decisions on their own. “I shouldn’t have that assumption of what their purchases might be,” she said.

This stigma surrounding addiction also stems from the general population being unaware of how difficult it can be to get clean. Many substances create a bodily chemical dependence, which results in long and painful withdrawal periods. People need moral and emotional support to quit and remain clean, and such support is even more important during these withdrawal periods. Going ‘cold turkey’ can also be medically dangerous and often necessitates the support of a detox or rehab program. Enrolling in such programs, however, is easier said than done. These programs often have certain criteria that candidates must meet, and their waitlists mean that enrolment could be months away. There is no guarantee that candidates will still be in good behaviour or have the strength, motivation, and support to enter the program that far down the road. Furthermore, Arthur points out that the programs are often short-lived at six to eight months, and the support afterwards could be more effective. “After [your program], then what? You don’t have a place, you don’t have anything. So where do you end up? Back on the streets. Back in the same place.”

Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside is dense with organizations and programs to help homeless people face addiction, sustain a healthy lifestyle, and help get them off the streets. This generous supply of resources is why many homeless people, including Thomas, choose to live there. However, if there are so many programs, why are there still people in the street, and why are there still people asking for money? “The services are great,” Thomas told me, “but they’re not enough.”

The low resources of the services in the Downtown Eastside was made evident as a woman stormed out of Insite, approaching Thomas and I yelling, “He won’t give me any fucking chill because I’m not a user!” (The “chill”, Thomas explained, was the coffee they were serving inside.) “I hope that guy gets fired!” After several minutes of heated complaints, an Insite worker came outside to calm the woman down. He explained that they had been very busy that day, which is why they couldn’t give out coffee to non-users.

After the worker left, the woman began complaining about how hungry she was and how badly she was craving pizza.

“Maybe they’re serving pizza tonight,” Thomas consoled hopefully, referring to the free meal they were hoping to receive from the Union Gospel Mission.

“It’s Thursday — so it’s probably liver,” one of Thomas’ friends offered up quietly.

“My favourite!” Thomas cheered — just a little too enthusiastically to be believable.

“There is a pretty long line outside UGM already. We should probably go,” the woman urged. It would be important for the trio to receive a proper meal on such a cold night.

Aside from not having enough supplies to go around, services provided by organizations and charities in the Downtown Eastside also aren’t entirely adequate for getting people off of the streets. There are a lot of things that people might need that these services don’t provide. For example, if a person gets clean from their addiction and wants to find a job, where do they wash up, and where do they find nice clothes for interviews? It would take a combination of organizations to meet these needs, if they could be met at all. That said, there are organizations to help the homeless get jobs, such as Mission Possible. They are one of the few job creation organizations in the Downtown Eastside, but they require that candidates fulfil a number of criteria before they can receive help. Schellenberg points to the prevalence of these restrictions within programs and how much control they can wield over participants. Staying on the street can provide a lot more freedom. For instance, Schellenberg explained that instead of being forced to sleep in a bedbug-infested single room occupancy (SRO) in order to receive certain services, a person sleeping on the streets has the freedom to choose where they want to sleep if it is warm outside. However, then they won’t be receiving any support and likely have a lower chance of leaving the streets. “Maybe there is a need to change the approach that we take towards these programs,” Schellenberg suggested — for more flexibility might encourage more participation and cooperation.

Donating your time or money to one of these organizations is a viable alternative for people who want to help the homeless, but don’t want to give money or food directly to people on the streets. Arthur suggests that you should research the organization first, however, to ensure that you support their mission and methods before getting involved with it.

Regardless of whether you give money directly to people on the streets, buy meals for the hungry, or donate to or volunteer with an organization — or even if you do none of these things — both Schellenberg and Arthur agree on one thing that every person should do when walking past someone on the streets: acknowledge them. “One of the biggest things that I have heard from people on the street is that they’re lonely,” Arthur explained. “And so when I have time, I stop to talk to them. Also, if I don’t have time, I always make sure I smile, and I make eye contact — because you would be amazed how many people will not even look at homeless people.” Schellenberg emphasized the importance of this, explaining that she always tries to make the people she encounters feel like an individual and a valuable member of society. “I try not to increase the level of excommunication and marginalization in society,” she said.

Arthur also suggests — if you are going to stop to chat with a homeless person — don’t talk down to them. If they are sitting on the ground, you should sit on the ground right next to them. “But always ask first,” Arthur warned. “For some people, the street is kind of like their living room — and you wouldn’t want anyone to come into your house uninvited and kick their feet up on your table, would you?”

There is a tendency to ignore homeless people or treat them rudely when they ask for money, and it is crucial that we don’t fall into that habit of behaviour. The most important thing to remember is to treat homeless people like humans, regardless of whether they are asking for money or not. “Yeah, they might be on the streets and they might be homeless,” Arthur said, “but that doesn’t change the fact that they’re still a person. If it were the other way around, how would you want to be treated? If you don’t actually take the time to stop and hear their story, you won’t know how they ended up there.”

Police seek help identifying potential witnesses

0

By Sahira Memon

Photos released regarding the death of Maple Batalia

On January 13 the Integrated Homicide Investigation Team (IHIT) requesting help from the SFU community in identifying bystanders from two security camera screenshots.

The email, with the subject line, “Maple Batalia Investigation”, explained that the email was being sent to SFU students on behalf of the lead investigator on the case. It also explained that due to newly obtained security tape footage, they have screenshots of people who were present near the time of the incident. They believe these individuals can be of assistance in the case and are requesting the help of the SFU community to identify them.

SFU’s Director of Public Affairs and Media Relations Don MacLachlan made it clear that those in question are not person’s of interest of suspects in the case.  In an interview with The Province he said, “They just happened to be in the general area of where the crime was committed around the general time.

“What IHIT is hoping is that maybe one of them saw something, heard something, noticed something, spotted a stranger        . . . anything, absolutely anything that might enable IHIT to put that tiny piece of information together with another piece of information and make another step forward in the investigation.”

The IHIT needs help from the SFU community and if there is any information on the people in these photos, tips will be accepted at the IHIT Tip Line at 1-877-551-4448, or through Corporal Mike Pacholuk at 1-607-702-4069.

Join the Club: Sepak Tekraw Club!

0

By Andrew Mclachlan

New to SFU? Missed clubs day? Finding it hard to make friends? Tired of sitting alone on Friday and Saturday night playing Settlers of Catan over Skype? Well I’ll bet there’s a club that can expand your gaming horizons! JOIN THE CLUB is the new feature of some of SFU’s lesser known clubs!

This week we highlight . . .

The Sepak Tekraw Club!

Sepak Tekraw is a Malaysian and Thai sport that translates loosely to “kickball” but this isn’t your grandma’s kickball club! “It’s like volleyball on steroids with kung-fu mixed in,” says club co-president Alex Razak, “Don’t let the volleyball part fool you. It’s more hardcore than any sport you’ve ever tried. I guarantee it.”

So far the club has only two members, Alex and his twin brother Ryan, who co-preside over the club. The club is looking to expand membership to form a team or two to compete intramurally. “In Malaysia they call us the Double Dragons. Our signature move involves Alex doing a backflip off my chest and spiking the ball towards our opponents. One time he shattered a man’s ankle with one of his infamous strikes,” states co-president Ryan.

Sounds like fun! Alex and Ryan meet everyday to train at West Gym at 5:00 a.m., so meet with them, sign the death and grievous injury waiver form, and join the club!

 

 

Ishmael: The Book

0

By Ben Buckley at Seemed Funny

Survey begins search for WebCT replacement

0

By David Dyck

University looking for a general assessment from student body

Last week, SFU launched a survey to gauge student opinion on a new Learning Management System to replace the current WebCT. WebCT is to be replaced by another learning management system (LMS) in 2014.
The survey is part of the first phase of the WebCT replacement program, and is taking place alongside focus groups and public forums. It will end in May of 2012, with the beginning of phase two: the “selection and implementation planning” phase.
The survey is made up of over 30 questions, with a $150 random prize draw. According to project organizers, the survey has garnered over 4,500 responses in the first week. The survey will be available to students until Monday, January 30.
Stacey Robinsmith is an SFU graduate student who has over 10 years in education experience. He’s worked with WebCT and other LMS in classroom settings, and described WebCT as “clunky” and not as intuitive as it could be. Robinsmith took the survey last week, but thought that it was too broad to be very effective. “They were pretty weak questions. The example would be: how important is it to be open, [or] user friendly? . . . who is not going to say that they want one that’s easy to use or open so that I can understand that system?” he told The Peak. Robinsmith stated that he would have liked to have seen questions about what platforms others have used, and their experiences with them. “More questions that they could have looked into were open source solutions. I don’t know if that’s on their radar or not,” said Robinsmith. He added that he was impressed with how long the consultation process is going for, and that he had been invited to a consultation group.
Mark Bachmann, communications officer for the Teaching and Learning Centre, responded to these concerns. “Obviously everyone wants an easy to use platform, but the survey will let us know for example how strongly they feel about a certain aspect of the LMS. For example, if ease of use comes in very, very high, that’s a factor we’ll take into account when we compare two systems that might be similar otherwise,” said Bachmann. He added that although they will not get specific answers from the survey, they plan to get those from other parts of the consultation process, such as the focus groups and open forums.
There are two more open forums this week on Burnaby Campus, on January 24 and 25 at Student Central.

TransLink pushes back gondola project

0

By Graham Cook

Fiscal concerns raised in business report

Following the sentiment of a recent business report, TransLink has decided to put a hold on the creation of the Burnaby Mountain gondola. The Gondola was slated to take passengers from the Production Way SkyTrain station to SFU’s Burnaby campus.

The firm found that the new project would save current riders 1.5 to 1.6 million hours annually of travel time with 26.1 to 29.2 million fewer vehicle kilometers travelled annually and a score of other benefits including lower auto operating costs, collision costs, and greenhouse gas emissions.  These benefits were valued at over $500 million dollars for a benefit-cost ratio of 3.6, indicating that benefits surpass the costs.

However, the estimated cost of the proposed gondola is $120 million with operating costs equating to about $3 to $3.5 million a year.  This totals to a 25-year combined cost of $157 million; $10 million more than what it is estimated that it would cost to maintain and expand the bus service.

Jeff Busby, TransLink’s manager of infrastructure planning spoke with The Peak and shared that “had the cost of the gondola been less expensive we could have considered in in our plans . . . we essentially could have used the savings from the bus service to offset the project within our existing plan but because the project requires more resources it would compete for resources with other projects and so it needs to be considered in a future plan.” This is due to the fact that if TransLink wants to provide a service that is more expensive than the services they currently provide they must create what is known as a supplemental plan. The most recent supplemental plan was called, “moving forward” and was concerned with building the Evergreen Line.

In an email release, SFSS president Jeff McCann said that “the student society has been in favour of the gondola for several years, and I think that the campus community could be enhanced by the gondola.” He added that he feels it will make the student experience at SFU better while being more sustainable both financially and environmentally.

Despite TransLink’s decision, SFSS at-large rep and SFU Community Trust board member Arry Dhillon remains optimistic about seeing a gondola at SFU in the near future. In an interview with The Peak, he stated that his best estimate for when the school would have a gondola would be within the next three to five years.

According to the business report, there are four routes being reviewed, including one from the Lake City station, two variations from the Production Way station, and one from the planned “Burquitlam” station that will exist on the Evergreen line.  “Route two”, which is one of the Production Way options, has emerged as a front-runner and would swap a 15-minute bus ride for seven-minute gondola trip.


Mystic Gary: Weight Loss

0

By Gary Lim

Dear Mystic Gary,

I hate myself for this, but over the Christmas break, I might have overindulged just a teensy bit too much.  An extra piece of shortbread here, a warm mug of festive spiced rum there. Who really even knows many times I splurged? (My thighs, that’s who!)

But to tell you the truth this happens every year and I spend the rest of January working off my holiday jelly-belly in time for Valentine’s Day. It can’t be good for me. I’ve tried Weight Watchers, Jenny Craig, South Beach, heck, even North Beach! Just kidding about that one.

Well Mystic Gary, I was hoping you might now one of those oriental remedies made from rattlesnake skin or any other ooglie-booglie that might give my metabolism a kick in the behind.

 

—Lady Already Regretting Diet

 

Dear LARD,

Don’t be ridiculous. Compote of snakeskin for weight loss? You might as well be taking powdered badger thighbone. Hahaha. But the time for laughter has been completed.  Now onto serious matters,  oh LARD, the weight of your plight flattens my soul like so many crumpled lawn chairs.

Now as for any Chinese remedies, traditionally a paste made from powdered shark fin heated in shell of galapagos turtle is said to be very good for building of strong leg muscles as well as  metabolism, though that’s mostly from having to outrun the animal rights activists.

Personally I would recommend acupuncture.  Not only because acupuncture is already recommended by many doctors for everything from pain relief to giving metabolism a boost but because the threat of being pierced with hundreds of tiny needles, which are then later set on fire, is a great motivator for losing of weight, as well as silence from any political dissidents. I’m looking at you SFP!RG.

 

May the Year of the Dragon help burn off those pesky calories,

 

—Mystic Gary

Movie review: Red Tails

0

By Will Ross

It’s important that films start to have casts that feature visible minorities, but Red Tails is just counterproductive to the cause

Red Tails has everything you’d expect from latter-day George Lucas, who produced the film and directed reshoots. This will delight everyone except fans of well-crafted movies. Red Tails is the story of black pilots proving to white people that racism is bad because they are equally or more capable of shooting down aircraft. It’s a depiction of race relations which is as honest and responsible as its claim to being “inspired by actual events.” Sure it was, just like the creators of Spider-Man were inspired by seeing an actual spider.

Granted, the Tuskegee Airmen were a real group of heroic black pilots who proved their worth in combat by amassing an exemplary record. Red Tails dramatizes this by having them make monumentally stupid decisions for which they are not punished, like piloting four planes against a heavily defended airfield. They slaughter Germans with videogame efficiency and earn begrudging accolades from brass. “You chalked eight kills in the air!” (By my count, it’s not possible that they got more than five on that mission. Nice proofreading, guys.)

Then that happens four more times. Red Tails’ repetitiveness is hell — which, we are unconvincingly told, war also is — and its episodic narrative isn’t helped by the complete lack of development or insight of its stock types (I refuse to call them ‘characters’). Every performance is terrible; unavoidable, with dialogue like, “This red paint will definitely make these planes distinctive!” Even more so with a plot that refuses to give them any ambiguity or intrigue: the film’s moral seems to be ‘black people have the right to the same clichés as everyone else!’ Not the Luftwaffe, though: they’re restricted to being zee evil Germans, cartoon villains whose deaths are unqualified victories.

I don’t have space to properly diss Red Tails’ aesthetics. It’s an ugly, ugly movie: uniform lighting, clunky tonal shifts, choppy editing, and CGI backgrounds that scream, “Oh my God, somebody forgot to finish me!” It’s so incompetent that major portions of the film are out of focus.

I must credit Red Tails for its political courage, though: it’s refreshing to see a film brave enough to give its sole female role no characterization or purpose beyond being the object of the male lead’s affections.