Home Blog Page 1406

GSS launches contest

0

<strong>By <a href=”http://159.203.128.194/tag/benedict-reiners”>Benedict Reiners</a></strong>

 

Site encourages staff and students to upload evidence of SFU’s deterioration

The SFU Graduate Student Society (GSS) recently started a contest, which encourages students to show the signs of the deterioration of SFU’s buildings. This contest, which students and staff can enter by submitting pictures of damages and deteriorations of any of the SFU campuses to the campaign’s tumblr, “I [heart] SFU”, aims to bring attention to the state of the campus buildings in order to pressure increased funding towards repair and renovation projects, as well as other building projects, such as seismic upgrades for buildings like the Bennett Library.

When questioned about the current status of SFU’s buildings, GSS advocate Christina Batstone stated that “at this point in time, SFU has assessed 53 per cent of their buildings as being in poor condition, with another 27 per cent in fair condition.” She added further that such figures excluded both roadways and other utilities. These categorizations are determined under the Facility Condition Index, a system that rates buildings on the proportion of the components that have reached the ends of their useful lives, as measured by cost. Under this categorization, something is categorized as “poor” after 50 per cent of its components have reached the ends of their useful lives. In addition to this, “fair” covers anything that has anywhere from 20 per cent to 50 per cent of its components past their useful lives.

The contest started accepting pictures on January 1, and will continue to accept submissions up until February 29, with the main prizes being drawn on March 14. Submissions are to be submitted to the “I [heart] SFU” tumblr.

“The buildings are in a constant state of repair and maintenance, but there has not been a time when so many buildings needed urgent care all at once,” said Batstone, citing the fact that as most of the buildings are roughly the same age, they are requiring maintenance at the same rate, which is overwhelming the limited resources available.

This constant costs required to maintain the buildings has lead to their neglect, with not only limited funds from the university, but also the federal and provincial governments. However, the GSS warns of the risks of doing so, pointing out the fact that the costs will need to be incurred eventually, and can only be put of for a finite amount of time. This is supported by SFU’s capital plan regarding the matter, published in April of 2015. This document states that if the issue were to be ignored for excessive amounts of time, university operations would become “impaired.” However, the extent of possible impairments is not yet known.

Though despite the fact that the full extent of possible damages and their respective impacts on students cannot be known in advance, the GSS insists that students can expect to bear some of the financial burden, so long as the provincial and federal governments don’t step in to help. “Students may see their fees increasing or additional levies,” stated Batstone, who also indicated that such increases in costs would likely be passed on to students apart from tuition, due to fixed increases which restrict it.

However, currently, the university is working with the provincial government towards finding a plan to address the deteriorating state of the campus. “The university is working closely with the Ministry of Advanced Education on the need to plan for the renewal of our older buildings,” said Larry Waddell, director of facilities development at SFU’s Burnaby campus, stating that it was these efforts that brought about the renovations to the Shrum Science Chemistry building, completed last year.

Despite the completion of such a project, GSS also encouraged students to get further involved in the matter, citing the significant amounts of work still to be done. They suggested efforts focused on the public awareness towards the issue, with the GSS providing recommendations for writing letters to local members of parliament and MLAs, or opinion pieces for regional newspapers. In addition to this, they once again encourage students to participate in their campaign, which “is open to all members of the SFU community and is a really easy way to support our efforts to address this issue.”

 

Faculty of Science eliminates student liaison position

0

By David Dyck

Two positions within the faculty eliminated, raising concerns of student–faculty engagement

On Thursday, January 26, the positions of coordinator, recruitment and retention, and the director of finance in the Faculty of Science were terminated. The termination of these positions came as a surprise to faculty members, students, and the employees themselves.

Stephen Price, who had held the position of coordinator, recruitment and retention, for five years, was “visibly upset”, according to Tabrez Hussein, the Simon Fraser Student Society representative from the science faculty. Price was an intrinsic part of the Geek Week and Science Frosh events at SFU in past years. “He’s the contact guy, and has been ever since Geek Week has been functioning at the school. He’s the administrator behind it. The funding for it came out of his budget,” Hussein told The Peak. Hussein explained that typically it’s difficult for students to talk directly to the faculty, and Price assisted in bridging that gap during his time in the position.

In addition, Hussein noted that Price’s position was terminated during Geek Week January 23 to 27. “He actually had a group picture scheduled with us at 2:30 [on January 26], and at 11:00 a.m. we hear [his position] was terminated . . . It was surprising to everybody.”

“This was a shock to us,” said Michael Chua, the budget and fundraising director for the Science Community Initiative. “We were in the middle of conducting Geek Week, and then Stephen approached us directors [of the Science Community Initiative] and that’s when we found out.”

The decision to eliminate the positions was made by the dean of science, Dr. Claire Cupples, who has held the position since August 1, 2010. Although Cupples declined The Peak’s request for an interview, she issued the following statement via email: “This organizational restructuring will not affect our student-focused or student-run programs. My associate dean and I met with the faculty of science representative of the Simon Fraser Student Society, and one of his colleagues, this past Tuesday morning so that they could reassure their fellow students on that point.”

Both Hussein and Chua were at the meeting on January 31, but neither felt confident that the duties performed in the position of student recruitment and retention coordinator would be taken up to the extent that it had been by Price. “I don’t understand why the dean wasn’t able to rewrite his job description, or even approach him about changing his job description; [it made] absolutely no sense. Also, there’s no clear vision as to what’s going on with the position that existed already,” said Hussein.

“We wanted to ask her who we can coordinate with for our events, since most of them are Faculty of Science related,” said Chua. “The dean assured us that we would get funded for Geek Week, but for future projects we have to propose first what we want to do, and if it’s aligned with the vision of the faculty of science then we would be funded or supported in any way that seems fit.” According to Chua, the dean assured them that although someone would be in contact with them, connecting students with the faculty would be less of a priority in the new position.

The Peak obtained a copy of the job description for Price’s former position. Although much of it revolves around active recruitment for the SFU Faculty of Science, an equal portion is given to promotion within the faculty, including “[liaising] with Student Services to ensure faculty recruitment and retention initiatives are consistent with university goals and objectives and to encourage joint development of initiatives.”

Jonathan Driver, VP-academic, told The Peak that positions are eliminated either for budgetary reasons, or because of restructuring within the faculty. According to Hussein, the reason given by Cupples for the termination of these positions was the latter.

“Whenever a position is eliminated it will always be sudden because there would not be any public dissemination of information about that, until the position has been eliminated,” said Driver, “so it would always work in this way.” He maintained that to the best of his knowledge, the process was done in accordance with university policy.

Both Price and the former director of finance, Siamak Saidi, declined to comment.

University Briefs

0

Yale students discover plastic-eating organism

 

A group of students on an annual rainforest exhibition with Yale University, were able to cultivate a fungus capable of digesting polyurethane in low oxygen environments. The findings, published late last year in the Journal of Microbiology, could have significant impacts on plastic landfill waste which scientists believe degrades over hundreds of years in such a low oxygen environment.

 

Alberta student arrested for pointing gun in residence

 

A student at Medicine Hat College has been arrested by police and permanently banned from the campus after pointing a gun at other students last Saturday. Witnesses say that the 25-year-old male pointed the gun at other residents after an argument escalated at the student residence buildings.  He is now facing weapons and other related charges.

 

UWindsor targeted by anti-Israeli graffiti

 

A number of globes at the University of Windsor campus library were removed after students complained of anti-Israeli graffiti on them. The primarily-Jewish nation of Israel had been scratched out of globes for at least three years, despite student complaints.

 

UBC clubs targeted by theft over winter break

 

Hundreds of dollars and a small laptop were stolen from three student clubs over winter break at the University of British Columbia’s Student Union Building. Changes to security measures in the area have been implemented since the incident which did not damage any door locks or windows.

 

UBC announces new gender studies institute

 

In celebrating its 20th anniversary, the University of British Columbia’s Centre for Women’s and Gender Studies announced the creation of the new institute for gender, race, sexuality and social justice in conjunction with its undergraduate women’s and gender studies program. The merger of the two programs will be complete in April and will aim to study gender issues in differing professions such as health care.

 

 

Ariane Madden


New student union building plans unveiled

0

<strong>By <a href=”http://159.203.128.194/tag/sahira-memon”>Sahira Memon</a></strong>

Possible tuition levy and new student union also discussed at forum

One of the plans discussed at the last forum meeting on February 1 was the creation of a new student union building in the Lorne Davies Complex. The purpose of such a building is not only to quell the frequent complaints of a lack of student space, but also to create a place on Burnaby Mountain in which all student unions and clubs could have a space of their own.

“A lot of other schools of our size and our prominence have the facilities that students need to be able to be engaged, stay on campus, and have good programs,” said Jeff McCann, SFSS president, on SFU student space. He compared it to student union buildings at other universities, such as at UBC.

He also emphasized the importance of creative ideas for the use of the space and likened the collection of ideas to the dropping of marbles into an empty jar.

“This jar is empty, you can see right through it . . . but it’s not really anything until you start putting things in it,” said Jeff McCann as he dropped marbles, representing different ideas, into the jar. He compared the dropping of these marbles to six weeks of discussion and debate to fuel creativity and ideas before the project begins.

The idea sharing began at the meeting, with an activity designed to determine the most popular uses of space for the new building, gauging options such as social space, DSU space, safe space, and family-friendly space. The results seemed to favor the space being used for DSUs (departmental student unions), and social space. McCann highlighted that this does not necessarily mean that this is how the space is going to be used, but it is useful to note these opinions, which will have a profound influence on the project.

Another topic was the creation of a new student union for the software systems program. This program deals with embedded software, and activities such as programming for either Apple or Android devices. The Department of Software Systems, formerly a subgroup within the Department of Computing Science, will now have a seat and a vote in future forums.

Finally, another debate centered around the possibility of a levy being added to student fees. The levy, with $1 being charged to full-time students, and $0.50 being charged to part-time students, would be directed towards Schools Building Schools, a registered charity focused on making education more accessible to underprivileged kids. Their current focus is on building and improving a school in Uganda. As alumni and students of SFU, their strong connection with SFU leads them to center their charity work at this institution. After much debate, the forum created and endorsed the referendum question:

“Are you in favour of a new fee of $1 per full-time student per semester and $0.50 per part-time student per semester to be levied for the benefit of the charitable international initiatives of Schools Building Schools?”

This question will be put on the upcoming SFSS general election ballot.

At the end of the meeting there was talk of a Society of Arts and Social Sciences financial presentation and a debate about the need for stipend payments among forum representatives. However, these issues will be discussed at future forum meetings.

SFU joins AUFC

0

<strong>By <a href=”http://159.203.128.194/tag/jennifer-bednard”>Jennifer Bednard</a></strong>

 

SFU the first British Columbian university to be accepted into the association of thirteen francophone universities

In the future, French language education and research at SFU will receive greater support on a national level. As of January 9, Simon Fraser University became an official member of the Association des universités de la francophonie canadienne (AUFC), an association of 13 officially francophone or bilingual universities across Canada including Laurentian University, Ottawa University, and the University of Moncton. The association’s mandate is to maintain the value of French as an official language and promote the learning and teaching of French at a university level. SFU is the first university in British Columbia to become a member of the AUFC.

“There were a number of criteria to become part of the association,” explained Claire Trépanier, director of the Office of Francophone and Francophile Affairs, “one of them was that the university had to deliver undergraduate and graduate programs that were taught in French in a variety of disciplines. [We] have the undergraduate program that is usually taught in French called the French Cohort Program, a program in administration and community services, and in the graduate programs, we have masters and a doctorate in the Faculty of Education that are completely taught in French. Another one that was important was that SFU delivers diplomas to cohorts of students who took those programs. Thirdly, [a criteria] that was very important was that SFU had to have an administrative structure that functions in French. In this case, it’s the Office of Francophone and Francophile Affairs.”

Trépanier added that both the university and the students would benefit from SFU’s membership in the AUFC. “One benefit is to provide visibility to SFU at the national level, in terms of post-secondary education in French. Another important one is to support the development of partnerships between those Canadian institutions so faculty members can get support for research that is done in French. And, a third one, which is very good for students, is to give access to bursaries for French immersion and francophone students pursuing studies in French, whether it’s here or through, for example, an exchange program in a francophone institution.”

SFU applied to become a member of the association in the fall, with the support of President Petter and Bill Krane, associate vice president, academic. “It’s key that the senior administration supports the kinds of programs that are being developed here and delivered at SFU,” said Trépanier, “ As director of OFFA, I believe that SFU is making a great contribution to fulfill the educational needs of the B.C. francophone and francophile community, and it is giving the French language the place it deserves in B.C.”

The Surrey stigma: The city we love to hate

1
Photo by Ben Derochie

By Kelly Thoreson

“I heard that Surrey was not the nicest place. It wasn’t a place you wanted to go to,” said Ella Sargent, a sixth-year kinesiology major at SFU. “The ‘ghetto’ is a bad word for it, but it is something along those lines.”

The legend of Surrey is common in the Lower Mainland, and SFU students are guilty of spreading the word: Surrey is not a nice place. Any number of reasons are given for this assumption, such as gang violence, shootings, ‘dirty’ girls, or ‘thug’ guys, to name a few. But is any of this true?

Surrey has gained a reputation for being a dangerous city — a reputation that isn’t completely unfounded: the ‘Surrey Six’ shootings in 2007, the ongoing gang wars, and the recent murder of SFU student Maple Batalia are just a few examples of high-profile violent crimes that have occurred in Surrey. According to a report by the Police Services Division of the B.C. Ministry of Public Safety, Surrey had an overall higher crime rate than Vancouver between 2001 and 2010. However, the difference in crime rates isn’t that significant. Certain crime rates, such as those for property crimes, are actually quite similar between the two cities.

Gang violence in Surrey has also escalated in the past few years. In an interview with The Vancouver Sun, Corporal Drew Grainger reported, “We have certainly seen a spike in gang violence, particularly in the last month in Surrey. There is no denying that. This comes in waves and we are in the height of another gang cycle of increased violence, unfortunately.” Grainger also indicated in the interview that he didn’t believe the public should be too worried about the increase in gang violence because “very few innocent bystanders are struck down by this kind of violence.”

So the myth about Surrey being plagued by gang violence might have a kernel of truth to it, however, you probably won’t get shot in Surrey unless you give someone a reason to shoot you (such as joining a rival gang). Chelsea Henry, a first-year kinesiology student who transits from the Burnaby campus through Surrey to her home in Langley, explained Surrey’s ‘safety’ issues as a matter of time and place: “There are parts of Surrey which are a little sketchy — like where the Surrey Central station is,” Henry said, “but it is only really sketchy at nighttime.”

Surrey Central is located in Whalley, a neighbourhood notorious for being the ‘bad’ part of the city. However, for a number of years the City of Surrey has been on a mission to gentrify the area and transform it into a downtown core, with some success. The combination of the SkyTrain station and SFU’s Surrey campus has been central to cleaning up Whalley. A new public library recently opened in the centre, and it will be joined by Surrey’s city hall in the future. These institutions have helped to make the walk between the SkyTrain station and the SFU Surrey campus likely the safest in Whalley.

It is a good thing that SFU Surrey is located right at the SkyTrain because, if it weren’t, it would be a lot more difficult to access. At 317 square kilometres, Surrey is the largest city in the Metro Vancouver area and more than double the size of Vancouver — yet it has a marginal amount of transit resources due to its suburban design. In a letter published last July on the blog City Caucus, Surrey mayor Dianne Watts addressed the transit issue: “It’s been 17 years since Surrey has seen an expansion of rapid transit, despite the fact that our population has more than doubled. Currently, our vast city is so underserved by transit that for most people it’s not a viable option.”

The city, while admittedly in need of transit service, is still not as dense as Vancouver — a factor which makes Surrey less walkable and transit-friendly. However, Surrey is rapidly growing, with the city’s website claiming it gains approximately 1,000 new residents per month. If the city succeeds in its plans to generate a downtown core and draw businesses, perhaps Surrey will become dense enough to facilitate a more easy-to-use transit system.

In order to become a denser city, Surrey will need to do something about how it is designed. Despite the City of Surrey’s motto, “the future lives here” Surrey is a suburb to its core. It is plagued with parking lots, food chains, and big box stores. Even if Surrey develops its transit system and becomes more densely populated, it will remain unfriendly to pedestrians (and therefore also to transit-users).

Surrey’s suburban quality really comes to the forefront when trying to find a fun activity to do. The only real nightlife is Mirage, and movie theatres are sparce. Plus, people are growing really tired of eating at Boston Pizza and shopping at the Wal-Mart Super Centre. Aside from its renowned selection of South Asian restaurants, Surrey doesn’t have much to offer.

Despite any personal feelings or thoughts you may have about the state of Surrey’s crime, transit, or entertainment situations, the SFU Surrey campus is a jewel in the city that you can be proud of.

SFU Surrey stands apart from the other campuses for a number of reasons. First, it is one of the most beautiful campuses. Similar to Woodward’s, SFU Surrey is made up of exposed wood, smooth concrete, wide windows, and splashes of colour. What sets Surrey apart from Woodward’s, however, is the abundance of student spaces. There is an abundance of lounges, seating, and “team rooms” available, and students at Surrey are actually sociable while they are using these spaces. Narula claimed that this is one of her favourite parts about the campus. “There is a close-knit community at SFU Surrey,” she said. “Not to be biased against Burnaby — I love that campus — but I love SFU Surrey in terms of community.”

There is more to like about Surrey than just the SFU campus, however. The new public library has received a lot of praise, and the city boasts a number of beautiful parks. Plus, it is next door to White Rock, where a stroll along the boardwalk always makes for an enjoyable day trip. Even if the Surrey of today doesn’t satisfy you, it is growing rapidly and may eventually steamroll Vancouver as British Columbia’s business centre. Surrey is already attracting businesses, and there is a developing trend of a reverse commute of workers from Vancouver to Surrey. “It’s got a bad rep,” admitted Carlos Suzara, a first-year sociology major from Surrey. “But Surrey’s not that bad. When you stay here for a while and really get to know the people and the diversity of people, it’s great. It’s a big city, and I heard that it is going to be the next downtown.”


“I don’t know how to use a condom” & other tales of how sex education failed me

1
Photo: Mark Burnham

I thought I had pooped my pants, but who poops their pants in the fifth grade? I didn’t remember going to the bathroom that day, but I guessed I must have — in my pants. Maybe it was ‘anal leakage’ — a word that I had recently heard a family friend use in reference to what happens after eating too many greasy chips. It must be that. What else would explain this mysterious maroon streak in my underwear?

After a day of walking around with my underwear packed full of toilet paper and taking frequent bathroom breaks, I decided I would try those things in my mom’s bathroom that I always saw on commercials — you know, the ‘super absorbent’ ones that they pour the blue liquid on. They would be a more effective diaper than this bundle of T.P. in my underwear. Definitely.

I pulled my pants down, expecting to see the brownish stain I had grown familiar with, only to be surprised by a different colour: red. My memory was jogged, taking me back to the second grade when my best friend said, “My mom told me that when girls get older, they bleed from their vaginas.” I had been dreading this day for years, but it didn’t hurt like I had imagined it would. It was just kind of . . . there. Relieved that I could start eating chips again, I asked my mom if she could buy more of those diaper things — or, pads — and that was the end of my ‘anal leakage’ phase.

Later that year, I learned about menstruation in my first sex education class. This is just one of the ways that the sexual health education system in my school failed me.

My sex education resembled what you see in the movie Mean Girls: “if you have sex, you will get pregnant, and you will die.”

I grew up in Abbotsford, B.C., which is nestled in the Fraser Valley about an hour’s drive east from Vancouver. As you drive within the city limits you will see a sign that says “Abbotsford: City in the Country”, reflecting the city’s growing population and its dedication to its agricultural roots. Most importantly, however, Abbotsford is the heart of the Bible Belt of British Columbia. I like to tell people that means there is a church on every corner — which is stretching the truth, but not by as far as you would think.

In B.C., individual school districts have control over the sex education implemented in schools, compared to Ontario where sex education is provincially-mandated. There are loose federal guidelines for how sex education should be implemented, and there are resources made available by the provincial government, however in the end the school district has a final say. This means that the religious sentiments of Abbotsford citizens could implicitly be transferred into my sex education curriculum, guiding both when I started receiving sex education (too late in my case), as well as what would be talked about in these classes.

The Abbotsford school district’s policy on sex education resembles what you see in the movie Mean Girls: “if you have sex, you will get pregnant, and you will die.” District policy details its support for teaching abstinence in schools, stating that “by encouraging and promoting responsible, informed decision-making and creating a climate where abstinence is celebrated as a smart, safe, healthy choice, the board anticipates that students will choose to not engage in sexual activity, thereby avoiding the associated negative emotional, physical, and psychological consequences.” Contraception, therefore, is a bit of a taboo subject for the Abbotsford school district. The policy specifies that while information on the various methods, their risks, and their failure rates will be provided to students, students will not be taught how to use contraception. “It is important for all teachers to address this topic within the context of ‘saving sex’ instead of ‘safe sex’ or ‘safer sex’,” the policy says in regards to contraception. “All discussions about pregnancy and STD prevention must focus on encouraging students to make the responsible choice of not engaging in sexual activity.”

Needless to say, I learned how to use a condom from watching Molly Shannon pretending to be a sex ed teacher in the movie Never Been Kissed — not from my own sex ed class. Not to mention all of the other dysfunctional happenings that went on in Abbotsford, such as girls who would have anal and oral sex freely — but were waiting to have vaginal intercourse so they could remain virgins.

Needless to say, I learned how to use a condom from watching Molly Shannon pretending to be a sex ed teacher in the movie Never Been Kissed — not from my own sex ed class.

It is because of school districts like Abbotsford that Sex Week is held in residence at SFU. Sex Week is an annual weeklong program run by Residence Life which features events such as sex information sessions, burlesque classes, sex toy parties, and Valentine’s Day card-making workshops. Alex Belfer, one of the organizers of this year’s event, which occurs this week, explains that they hold this program for a number of reasons: it is fun, but most importantly, it is educational. He claims Sex Week provides “an open and healthy place” for residents to learn about and discuss sex with people they trust. The need for this program is demonstrated through the varying levels of knowledge that residents have about sex coming into university. “While you hope that they come with the knowledge,” Belfer said, “they come from diverse backgrounds . . . and each different background approaches sex differently.”

With the amount of sex and sexuality that children and youth are exposed to through scenes in movies, ads in magazines, or internet pornography, it is important to properly educate students in order to provide a context for this information. For instance, children — especially girls — should be taught from a young age about self-image and self-worth, and teenagers should be educated on the porn industry and the expectations that it can create. One would hope that this occurs before young people become sexually active — and at the very least, they should be equipped with this knowledge before moving out of their parents’ homes.

Ontario’s provincial government is trying to create a sex education curriculum that fits students of the 21st century. Beginning at a young age, the curriculum is inclusive of the diverse students in the system and a wide array of issues surrounding sexual health — such as explaining gender identity and sexual orientation, and emphasizing acceptance. This curriculum reform has caused a lot of controversy, however, with many residents opposed to the changes — mirroring the recent uproar over Burnaby’s sex education reform to include LGBT culture and issues in the curriculum.

Public education should not be impacted by the values — religious or otherwise — of a community. Sex education is a matter of physical and emotional health and well-being, and it is important that children and youth are informed on the issues at hand. While parents are a good place to start this education, there needs to be a way to ensure that all children receive adequate and effective sexual health information. The Canadian Guidelines for Sexual Health Education, published in 2008 by the Public Health Agency of Canada, argues that schools are in a unique position to provide sex education because they are “the only formal educational institution to have meaningful (and mandatory) contact with nearly every young person.” However, in British Columbia, there is no way to ensure standards of sex education because it varies between districts.

Sexual health education is too important to leave up to individual school districts — or to wait until university programs like Sex Week. Girls should be prepared for their first periods; boys should know what is happening when they get their first erections; young people should know how to put on a condom by university. These are the basics, and even these needs aren’t being met by all school districts. The B.C. Ministry of Education needs to reform so that it can dictate the sex education curriculum. Sex Week shouldn’t be a student’s first point of contact with effective sex education; it should be a fun week of events where they can explore sexuality and become more comfortable talking about it.

Ski Ninjas: Stem Cells

0

By Kyle Lees at Ski Ninjas

Word on the Street: Reading Break

0

By Gary Lim

SFU establishes new Faculty of Bears

0

By Gary Lim


Citing interest from the increasing bear population at SFU, the board of directors in association with the president’s office has decided to create the new Faculty of Bears.

“It’s a no brainer really, as of 2012 members of the family Urisidae will comprise four per cent of the student population on the mountain,” noted Shelly Thurman, newly instated dean of the fledgling faculty. “It’s an absolute shame that these majestic creatures have yet to be recognized for their ingenuity and intelligence. For far too long whenever a lone black bear wandered onto campus—likely in search of higher education—it was destroyed and mixed into the Chartwells’ meat supply, but no more.

Administrative analysts such as Stephen Calhoun say that the influx of new ursine students is just what SFU needs to facilitate future growth. “For a long time now international students have been the fiscal cornerstone of SFU, but we need to see a shift if this institution is to survive. We need to be bold, and tap into the virtually untouched non-human markets. Who knows how much vital revenue, in broken-off chunks of honey comb and half-eaten deer carcasses, will be pumped into school because of it?”

The programs offered by the faculty will range of a diverse number of topics from first-year foraging techniques, to seminars on how to properly defend your thesis and cubs. The classes will predominantly be held in Blusson Hall, now renamed Bearson Hall. Any human student caught inside Bearson Hall limits will no longer be covered under their SFU Health Plan.

In anticipation of the inception of the new department, existing faculties will begin offering bear-related courses in hopes of enticing the new students, as well as the leaving of open garbage receptacles outside lecture halls. Among the new courses offered are ECON331: Trends of a Bear Market, ENGL103: Bears of Canadian Literature and SA400: Bears in society: The ageing gay gentleman.

Overall student approval of the project remains high with only several vocal students decrying the logistics of the faculty. Freshman Andre Nicoletti remarked, “Am I the only one who thinks this is a terrible idea? I mean they’re bears, they’re forest animals, creatures that could rip us into lunch-sized pieces no problem. But for some reason now we want to put them in the middle of a densely populated, loud, and stressful environment? Who comes up with this shit?

I’ve tried speaking to other students and professors too about this but they just ignore me; no, they literally act as if I no longer exist. We’ll be talking about classes or tutorials and everything will be fine. But if I so much as mention the word ‘bear’, their faces go blank and their eyes drift off like something’s disconnected in their brain and then they’ll start smiling, a horrible rictus grin, and then they’ll just walk away. What the hell is going on here?”