Home Blog Page 1360

Pills, Pills, Pills: The Growing Concern Around “Study Drugs”

0

By Shannon Palus

“I hate that people take ADHD medications to study,” says Katie Ellston*, halfway through our first round of raspberry blondes on a late summer’s day.

She begins telling me about a side of so-called “study drugs” that I had never quite stopped to consider. “I’d give a million dollars not to have to pop a pill every day,” she says.

The tale of the student who takes ADD/ADHD medication sans prescription is, to the modern day university student, a familiar one. Alex* finds that these meds improve concentration and keep you up all night, something that is often necessary in the over-extended schedule of a student. Alex buys the medication from a friend whose ADHD prescription provides them with more pills than they need. Alex has a few sweaty, red-eyed nights, but has plans to work at Goldman Sachs and live in a nice flat downtown.

This phenomenon is so common that even students who don’t abuse prescription drugs are likely to know where to get them. An editorial last year in the Canadian Medical Association Journal published that an estimated five to 35 per cent of students abuse prescription stimulants. The editorial is titled “Time to address stimulant abuse on our campuses,” and calls for the de-normalization of their use.

But Ellston is not like Alex. During the school year, she takes a pill every day. She’s had a prescription for Concerta — Ritalin’s long-acting cousin — since she was diagnosed with ADHD at 15. “It’s a hardcore drug,” she says – something she feels that people who take the drug recreationally don’t understand. When she goes across the border to the U.S., for example, she can only take one pill for every day she is traveling, and she must carry a doctor’s note. Furthermore, she feels that casual prescription drug use trivializes her illness, something that is part of her everyday life.

Concerta, like other medications commonly used to treat ADD/ADHD, is a stimulant, meaning it increases the amount of dopamine in the user’s brain. With Concerta, Ellston experiences many of the physiological aspects of an addiction. On days when she does not take her medication, she experiences headaches, nausea, and slight depression, much like a cocaine user coming off a high or a coffee addict running too late for work to pop by Starbucks. Furthermore, if she takes it later than 10 a.m., she cannot fall asleep later that night. During the summer, Ellston chooses to go off Concerta, and she has up to a week of nausea and depression — a detox that she calls “hell”.

Concerta produces similar effects in people with ADD/ADHD as it does for people without, though the improvement in concentration is more dramatic for people who have clinically diagnosable difficulties with concentrating. Scientists aren’t exactly sure how it works: literature is littered with the words “might” and “probably.” The thinking goes that upping the amount of dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain — which ADD/ADHD medication does — improves concentration. People with ADD/ADHD may naturally have less of these neurotransmitters, the conventional wisdom goes, which is probably why taking Concerta can bring them up to the level of concentration that most people experience without the help of drugs.

To some degree, most stimulants have the effect of improving concentration. Robert Franck, the Clinical Director of McGill Mental Health Service, says that he’s had patients that turned out to be ADD/ADHD, that have been self-medicating by excessively drinking coffee. Like Ellston, he doesn’t like the fact that students  casually take medication without a prescription. Though the drugs are relatively safe, they come with a suite of risks and side effects, and their use should be carefully monitored by a health professional — one who knows what other drugs you’re on, too.

Hypertension, arrhythmias, and psychotic episodes are the more extreme effects of ADD/ADHD medication. The CMAJ editorial rattles these off, and adds that, though rare, overdoses are “potentially lethal.” These are all true and valid reasons not to abuse ADD/ADHD medication, explains Franck. “But scare tactics don’t really work,” he says.

It’s not just potential physical harm that concerns him; Franck explains that taking drugs as a band-aid solution to things like school anxiety is potentially done to mask clinical anxiety or depression. Franck’s motto is, “medication when necessary, but not necessarily medication.”

When Ellston was diagnosed with ADHD, the medication was the last step of her treatment plan, and remains just one part of her regimen. In addition to taking the drug, Ellston sees a therapist every week. Through the Office for Students with Disabilities, she’s allowed four hours instead of three to complete exams, as well as a short break to walk around during an exam. She also gets to bring in a “fidgeter” — a small object that she can play with.

She also has to know her own study habits incredibly well: she doesn’t work on any one assignment for more than half an hour at a time. “The information won’t stick if I try and make myself,” she says. She describes the feeling of having ADHD as having 100 different thoughts going on in your head at once, popping around and soaring off on their own little orbits. “When I’m on the drugs, instead of 100 thoughts, I only have 50. And when one tries to go off on a tangent,” she says, moving her hand away from her head. “I can feel it being pulled back. It’s like it hits a wall.” It’s not that she’s not herself on the drug; it’s just that her thoughts behave in a different manner. “Being on the drugs is like running down a hallway, and not being on them is like running through a field.”

The fact that these are prescription drugs with a medical use hadn’t quite settled in my mind before. Perhaps it’s because of stories that have been popping up in the media, each taking the tack that study drug abuse, like hooking up, smoking pot, or using the internet, is a new trend hitting the continent’s youth; perhaps it’s because the high school I went to was filled with overachievers who went on to universities that boasted as much of a problem with ADD/ADHD medication abuse as they did with any other drug. Though I’ve never taken Ritalin or Concerta, it’s never occurred to me that I should have any qualms about doing so; not even the basic concerns that come with smoking pot now and then. It’s not even treated like a recreational drug in the crowd I run with. It’s not done for fun — it’s done to achieve.

It seems I’m not alone. Alan Desantis at the University of Kentucky has spent the past handful of years facilitating interviews with hundreds of students. He found that, for some, taking the medication sans prescription was less of a concern than drinking beer or smoking cigarettes. In his research he found that students use a number of arguments to justify their lax use of the medication: that they only take it during finals, that they are self-medicating for concentration problems, and what Desantis referred to as the “I’m-doing-it-for-the-right-reasons” argument.

“No, they’re definitely a drug!” says George Bellwood*, a McGill student who took un-prescribed Concerta several times last year. “Yes, eight, I think,” he says, counting on his fingers. “I’m thinking about this in terms of the number of major assignments.”

For Bellwood, the study drugs are a tool for long nights of working that comes free of health or moral concerns — scare tactics referencing potential death do not work on him.

Concerta allows Bellwood to work overnight. He’ll drink two or three cups of coffee in the evening, settle into the arts computer lab, and get to work on a paper. Around two a.m., when the coffee stops being enough, he’ll pop a pill. “It’s like licking iron,” he says of the metallic taste of Concerta. Soon after, he’ll feel jittery, sweaty, but then his mind will clear, he explains. And then he’ll work.

“You don’t lose track of time. You’re really aware of the next step,” he explains dispelling my notion that these drugs offer a sort of trance. “And you don’t want to be doing the work. You just are.”

He’ll continue in that robotic haze, one task, and then the next, and then the next. By four a.m., there are only two or three other students left, at least one of them asleep. “It’s so fucking bleak in that room, with those fluorescent lights.” The janitor comes in at seven, signaling that the rest of the world has moved on to the next day.

Bellwood’s normal facial expression is a sort of Cheshire-cat grin, which makes him seem at once eager and carefree. He talks about history — citing paradigms and scholars — the way other people talk about TV shows. He plans on going to grad school when he’s done at McGill: last semester, he got a 4.0 GPA, started a journal, edited a section of a campus newspaper, had a part-time job, and, though he insists his social life was cut by half, he still went out every Saturday.

In awe, I ask him how he does it all. “The drugs!” he exclaims, throwing his hands in the air — what had I thought I was interviewing him about?

The drugs are a prop he hopes to cast aside once he’s finished hopping along the stepping stones to a successful future — perhaps in grad school, perhaps working an entry level position. He’s not sure when, he just knows that there will be a time in the future when the work will pay off, a spot in life where the things on his to-do list can be accomplished without him breaking out into a chemically induced sweat, and with room left over for seven hours of sleep and a substantial social life.

Sitting in Franck’s office, I outline Bellwood’s reasoning: wanting grades and extracurricular to be a tangible currency that he can exchange for a job after graduation, and knowing meds can make him do more and do better. Shouldn’t we take a leg up in the world when we can? “I would say to those people: why do you feel you have to study so hard?” Franck says. Wanting to get ahead in life does not necessitate medication — you can be organized and reasonable about what you take on, he reasons. But it’s not just that: Franck thinks doing drugs to wend one’s way through undergrad amounts to cheating yourself out of the things that you actually enjoy in life: whether coding, reading, or playing soccer, these are activities at which you might end up being successful, and which you enjoy.

“That, that is the kind of attitude that I fucking hate,” exclaims Bellwood, when I bring up Franck’s argument. “It’s actually really harmful, that kind of faux naivete: ‘why are you studying so hard?’ Theoretically, this is the point of attending a university.”

This brings up a much larger reality: that university is a dream world of sorts, a strange pocket of society filled with bright people, 24-hour study facilities, 24-hour coffee shops, and an endless tunnel of hoops to jump through. We’re judged by our peers, by the numbers that stare back at us from our transcripts, by the test score requirements on grad school information pamphlets. Perhaps most importantly, for Bellwood and for many of us, we’re here for genuine reasons: because we love academia, because we want to be happy and prosperous. Doing well in academia can bring us those things, and drinking coffee and popping pills can bring us success in academia. It seems like such a simple transaction.

But to Franck and other outside observers, it appears that you have to learn to live within the constraints of the real world. “University is a wonderful opportunity to develop understanding,” explains Franck. “Not just academic, but how to feel good about yourself, how to manage time and to develop coping strategies.” By popping study drugs, Franck believes you set yourself up in a lifestyle that is unsustainable and potentially soul-sucking, one that’s not based on doing the things that make you happy, but on the things that you feel others want out of you. Still, he sympathizes with the plight of the George Bellwoods of the world. That’s why he thinks people like him need to work harder to educate students about the perils of study drugs, and about ways to cope without the drugs.

Ellston, who’s studying high school education, agrees with Franck. When on field experience she’ll often have an ADHD child or two in her classroom, and she feels she can effectively teach these kids in a way that teachers without ADHD can’t. “They’ll do things like stand up in the middle of class and start walking around, and their teacher will say, ‘no, no, sit down,’” she explains. Instead of becoming frustrated and disciplining them, or singling them out, Ellston can empathize: “I’ll talk to them about it, and say, ‘if you need to stand up during class, stand up. I need to do that too sometimes.’”

Right or wrong, excusable or not, the fact remains that some people, like Ellston and the kids she works with, need ADHD medication, while others — Bellwood being one — use them for other purposes. It has become part of many university cultures, but has also grown to be a public concern.

 

*Names have been changed.

The Daily Snooze: Paper Boy

0

Possible election fraud holds grave implications for Canada

0

 

By Benedict Reiners
Photos by Remy Steinegger

The first-past-the-post-system, which Canada uses in its federal elections, has been referred to as an “elected dictatorship.” This term reflects a system that operates off of the premise that the election winner more or less gets to do whatever they want to push forward their agenda. But what happens when someone isn’t really elected, and still gets to help form this elected dictatorship?

The Supreme Court is looking into this very question right now, as it reviews a case of potential election fraud in Ontario. This fraud is alleged to have taken place in the Toronto riding of Etobicoke Centre, now held by Conservative MP, Ted Opitz, after he won the previous election by a total of 26 votes. The controversy centers on 79 voters that were found to have cast a vote without providing evidence that they were permitted to do so. An Ontario court has already deemed that these charges are sufficient to throw out the election results.

Regardless of one’s preferred party, it is easy to see that if the ruling overturns the results of the riding’s election, it will provide an easy target for opposition parties to attack. It is not only ethical that the Conservative Party does something to ensure that nothing like this happens again, but also in their strategic interest. It is for this reason that we can hope that the Conservatives, a party not exactly known for progressive stances on social or ethical issues, will actually act in this case. The party must send the message that change is happening, and although the best thing would be to provide additional legislation to prevent problems like this from occurring in the first place, even declaring that they won’t allow Mr. Opitz to run as their candidate would be a good start.

However, though only strategic reasons may convince the government to properly address this issue, others bear mentioning as well. Foremost amongst these are the implications that the upcoming Supreme Court ruling for our electoral system. If we do not root out these problems, we will be dealing with a much longer and far more enduring problem than 79 votes and a seat that is not needed to maintain a majority. This is as much about the political culture in our country as it is about Etobicoke Centre, if not more so, and the actions taken, both by the government and the Supreme Court, must reflect this. If they don’t, they will be creating a culture that could potentially remove voters from the elections process.

If the government is confident that their candidate actually won the riding, then they shouldn’t be afraid of a by-election. Yes, money is tight for both Canadians and the government right now, but elections are and always will be a good use of our money.  Maybe democracy has a cost, but it is a cost still worth paying. If this government wants to get tough on crime, they need only look as far as the election to prove it.

It’s time to pack in the cigarette pack warnings

0

 

By Jon Liedtke — The Lance (CUP)
Photos by Greg Hertz

Windsor (CUP) – The majority of us get it: cigarette smoking isn’t good for you. In fact, it’s downright bad for you. Tobacco use can cause many diseases including heart attack, stroke, emphysema, and cancer. It increases the risk of Crohn’s disease and is the number one cause of bladder cancer.

According to the World Health Organization, roughly 100 million people have died from tobacco use over the course of the 20th century.

From grade school to the end of high school, the majority of educational institutions teach the ills of smoking, and how bad a choice it is to make.

The majority of anti-tobacco messaging, while well-intentioned, doesn’t seem to work. People still smoke at alarming rates. Anti-tobacco literature is placed in every store that sells tobacco, but people still use the products.

The most dramatic form of anti-tobacco literature is on cigarette packaging itself. Legislation from Ottawa last September now requires new labeling on cigarette packages, which covers 75 per cent of the package, and aims to “horrify smokers into not smoking.”

Indeed, with graphic pictures of a cancer-infected mouth or a 42-year-old woman dying of cancer, the images are horrifying. Considering we have a publicly funded health system, I can fiscally understand why the government would want to promote a tobacco-free lifestyle.

The merits of the program aside, many who don’t smoke are offended by the program as well. While cigarettes are hidden behind sealed displays at stores, anyone around a smoker sees these new ads.

Those who don’t even smoke are being levied the burden of being “horrified into not smoking.” They’ve already made the choice not to smoke, so why punish them as well?

Smoking tobacco is a deadly addiction that often claims those closest to us. Having lost family members to smoking, I stand by the government in actively attempting to discourage smoking.

However, I must distance myself from the government in their legislation of cigarette packages. The year is 2012, and we don’t have doctors prescribing cigarettes, or 1950s tobacco jingles devised by Madison Avenue advertisers.

It’s time for the government to treat citizens like educated adults. If the government is seeking to lower tobacco use, provide incentives. Conversely, they could increase taxes on tobacco.

Either way, something should be done that doesn’t limit the ability of a company to determine its packaging. Perhaps we can move as other countries have and simply ban any tobacco-related advertising — thus hiding it entirely from our society.

Ski Ninjas: Scrabble

0

By Kyle Lees at Ski Ninjas

The dos and don’ts of breaking up

0

By Ms. X

“My partner and I just broke up. It was my first serious relationship in university and I have no idea how to handle it. We’re in the same friend group so we are constantly around each other. Please help me!”

Ending a relationship is never easy. Whether it was mutual or one-sided, everyone needs time to heal and move forward.  Here is a sexy do and don’t list to give you a basic idea of how to handle your breakup and enjoy your single life.

DO: Find a good group of friends. If you shared a lot of friends with your ex, it may be time to contact some friends outside your main group or pick up a part time job with a young, fun staff. Having a fresh group of people around you will make the transition easier, and a little harmless flirting with a co-worker is never a bad way to kill time at work.

DO: Keep busy. After a relationship ends, you are usually left with a lot of free time. Use this newly freed up time to do something just for you. Why not pick up that guitar you told yourself you would learn to play? Not being tied down, your summer is open for anything so grab some friends (and definitely some hotties) and plan a road trip or hit the beaches.

DO: Spend some “me time.”  One of the biggest things missing after a breakup is your sex life. Though one path to take is hitting the bar and finding someone for the night, a safer and likely a more satisfying option is have some solo fun. Treat yourself to a new toy and take some time to discover that you may be all you need to maintain a healthy sex life.

DO NOT: Stay in bed and mope all day. Its summer! Get out there and meet new people. You don’t need to be on the lookout for the next Mr. or Ms. Perfect right away, but a rebound never hurts! Go out with some friends and flirt freely. A little attention is always nice.

DO NOT: Jump right into another relationship.  Rebounds are a fun way to transition into singledom, but don’t get carried away with someone. By moving quickly into a new partnership, you risk bringing your past relationships issues with you, which isn’t fair to you or your new partner. Give yourself time to be single and mingle!

DO NOT: Bombard your ex with texts or phone calls. It can be hard to move on right away but it is important to give your cell a rest from dialing their number. Constantly trying to contact them will only make things harder for you and most likely only annoy your ex.  When you pick up that phone and have the urge, text your bestie or bro, or even better, that cutie who gave you their number at the pub last night.

Breakups are never fun, and it can be hard to distance yourself from your ex if you run in the same circles. Just remember to look on the bright side, single life opens up doors all over the place. A hottie rebound might be what you need to give your solo persona a boost, and a new toy may lead to a more satisfying sex life than you had before. Being unattached, your summer is open to all kinds of new experiences and adventures so DON’T waste time being bummed out, and DO go out and embrace your single life!

Campus Update: July 16, 2012

0

SFU voted 394th in top 1,000 over 1,000

In a recent polling conducted by popular Canadian news magazine MacLeans, SFU was ranked 394st, dropping 7 spots from its 2012 ranking. The 1,000 over 1,000 ranks the top 1,000 post-secondary insititutions situated over 1,000 feet above sea level.

The ranking draws on data from multiple sources and rates the institutions based on factors such as undergraduate satisfaction, student to instructor ratio, number of graduates produced yearly, thickness of air at peak, and height. For the past decade SFU has repeatedly failed to break the 350th mark, coming its closest in 2003 at 353rd. UBC Nepal is currently ranked 205th overall.

When questioned about the poor rating given to the school, SFU president Andrew Petter declined to comment, but was heard angrily grumbling about “it all being politics.”

 

— Henry Henderson

 

Public displays of affection banned on campus

By royal decree of Lord Petter himself, as of July 16, 2012, any and all expressions of affection between students at SFU are forthwith forbidden.

Public displays of affection, also known as PDAs, will hereby be monitored both by invisible CCTV, as well as over 150 specially trained plain-clothes PDA police patrolling the campus.

Any two caught holding hands, adorably feeding each other, or wistfully gazing, will be expelled immediately. Their transcripts will reflect a failing grade in all courses taken and all collected tuition will be rendered forfeit.

Students are encouraged to maintain a safe distance of 3 meters between each other at all times and to report any errant behaviour to one of three dozen newly erected PSA reporting stations. Conduct yourselves accordingly.

 

— Paul Hurst

 

Calendar error gives students latest possible enrollment date

While others might gripe about their July 21st, 24th or even 28th enrollment dates, complaining that by then all the good tutorials will be gone, second-year communications student Samantha Konstantina doesn’t have that luxury. Her enrollment date is August 2nd, 2016.

Due to a computer error, the automated uRecords system has set the enrollment date of the unlucky student to just over four years away, the average length of an degree at SFU.

In an official letter to Konstantina, SFU registrar writes, “Although we deeply regret the consequences of our error, it is the strictest policy of the Registrar’s Office not to change the enrollment date of any student.”

When asked if she would spend her new free time preparing for her degree by auditing classes. Konstantina responded, “No, that seems like a waste of time.”

 

– George Giordano

Where are they now?

0

Ever wonder what happened to those celebrities who were everywhere back then, but have since fallen off the face of the earth? Well, stop asking yourself stupid questions and find out where they are — now!

 

Joseph Kony

Former African Warlord

Following the KONY 2012 campaign, former head of the Lord’s Resistance Army Joseph Kony was forced into hiding after a massively negative response on his Facebook feed. Today the former child soldiers are free to do as they please whether that be diamond mining, scrounging for scrap metal or weakly batting away flies.

 

Icing

Drinking Game

The popular marketing scheme and drinking game created by Diageo to sell Smirnoff Ice, the fruit-flavoured nail polish remover, has since been retired in favour of their new campaign, where people smash full bottles of the drink against the skulls of their friends while shouting “You got Cuss’D!” The new campaign is expected to earn over $25 million the next year alone.

 

Danny Wadzinski

The one weird kid from your 2nd grade class

Daniel Wadzinski now lives a modest rancher style home in Campbell River with his wife Sharleen and their newborn daughter Jessica. Just kidding, the last time anyone saw Danny Wadzinski, he was living behind 7-Eleven on Robson offering handy-Js in exchange for clean needles. But what do you expect, I once saw the kid eat a glue stick like it was a banana. That’s fucked up.

Petter Watch: July 16th

0

Analysis of SFU’s viability as a fortress during zombie warfare found in Petter’s desk drawer.

Opponents of no-zero marking fail to see the benefits

0

By Jamie Mason — The Carillon (CUP)

REGINA (CUP) – For anyone unclear of the concept, the no-zero policy is a recent trend in schools that attempts to hold students accountable for their work and set the real criteria for grading. This has brought to light the education system’s double standards for grading criteria.

Some teachers have raised complaints about the no-zero policy even for late work, but what does the zero represent, really? Students are being penalized on their behaviour instead of ability. Students don’t receive higher marks for handing in their assignment earlier, so why should they lose marks for handing it in late?

Also, what are those numbers supposed to represent? According to the policy, students who refuse to either do the work or hand in enough to be evaluated will be marked as “unable to evaluate.” This sets the real criteria for students’ assignments as what they have written, rather than when they handed it in.

Lynden Dorval, an Edmonton high school teacher, was recently “suspended indefinitely” for giving out zeroes after the policy was adopted.

“To me, this is just not working,” Dorval told the Edmonton Journal “It’s a way of pushing kids through and making the stats look good, but at what cost?”

Dorval apparently neglected to read the schools’ Assessment, Grading, and Reporting Practice. Students with incomplete or missing assignments are still held accountable. However, the method of evaluation has changed.

The no-zero policy is commonly accompanied by another policy allowing students to hand in work long after it is due with no penalties on their grade. Instituted instead is a dual grading system. Students will be graded on the content of their assignment, as well as their behaviour. According to the Ross Sheppard School Assessment, Grading, and Reporting Practice, “[if] an assignment [is] not completed on time, or an exam missed due to illness, the teacher will arrange an alternate time when the student can complete the assignment. A behaviour code will be entered in the mark book until the assignment is completed.”

These behavioural codes range from “not handed-in” (NHI) to “chose not to attempt” (CNA) or even skip.

This method is far more practical for a variety of reasons, one being that employers want to know how well a student can work and meet deadlines, not necessarily how well they can write an essay. If students were graded using two report cards, one for behaviour and one for academic achievement, they would be held accountable for their behaviour without penalizing their ability. The behavioural report card would allow employers an actual understanding of the potential employee’s work ethics and conduct.

Many people against the policy argue that it doesn’t set students up for the real world or hold them accountable, but these policies are attempting to do something much more than that: they are trying to fix a broken system.