Home Blog Page 1264

Conference discussed making cities work for women and girls

0

WEB-WTC Conference-Geoff Webb

The event discussed whether gender and equity are in the community planning process 

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by Geoff Webb

Esteemed women in our community are challenging how cities function by claiming that municipalities create ineffective policy when they fail to address issues through a gender and equity lens.

On May 30, SFU hosted the Women Transforming Cities (WTC) Conference: Designing An Ideal City For Women And Girls. The Conference was designed to bring together elected officials, academics, urban designers and planners, and others interested in transforming our cities into places where women are more involved and where the municipalities keep minorities’ needs in mind when designing policy.

The Conference was strategically held before the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Annual Conference and Trade Show, which took place last week from May 30 to June 3. The event allows community members to come together to discuss the planning and infrastructure of their cities and towns.

At issue at the WTC event was the need to make cities work for women and girls, regarding all the things that cities provide (housing, safe streets, transit, and more). However, creating change is complicated by the difficulty of coming up with recommendations on which municipalities can be held accountable.

“Unless there is a specific strategy in place, there is no incentive for municipal governments or corporate governance to think about how their policies, their budgets, these kind of things affect women and girls and marginalized communities,” said Dr. Tiffany Muller Myrdahl, Ruth Wynn Woodward Junior Chair in SFU’s Gender and Urban Studies Department for the 2012-2013 academic year, and an organizer of the event.

The purpose of the conference was to create implementable recommendations, bring forward and raise the profile of various issues, and look at questions like sustainability through a gender lens. A gender or equity lens is a tool that organizations can use in their regular operations to attempt to view an issue from someone else’s perspective, be it of a specific gender, race, or social group.

According to Myrdahl, using a gender lens means thinking critically about how the city works and asking questions such as who is it working for, who is participating, and how responsive are municipal leaders to marginalized communities. By way of illustration, one could look at Vancouver’s Greenest City 2020 Action Plan and analyse how this initiative affects the household.

“When you look at, for example, composting and doing more recycling . . . that relies on the unpaid labour of the household,” said Muller Myrdahl. “Part of doing a gender lens is asking, What kind of extra work are we putting on the household, and who is going to do that work? . . . What kinds of support do the people in the household need to make this policy actually work on the ground? That’s the kind of question that is often left out of those large scale action plans.”

In her keynote speech, Muller Myrdahl brought further focus to the need for both individuals and municipalities to change how they think about policy. Entitled “Interventions for Feminist Urban Futures,” the speech considered how we frame the stories we tell about cities.

To demonstrate her point, Muller Myrdahl brought up the example of Little Nest, a Vancouver haven for foodies and families alike. The breakfast and lunch beacon, which is nestled just off Commercial Drive, is facing closure because of a 50 per cent rent increase. Instead of challenging why these policies exist, which Muller Myrdahl hopes to have them do, the press has mainly been telling sob stories of the small cafe.

“When I hear about situations like that, what it tells me is that we’re taught to frame our municipal politics and the way cities work around finite resources that we have to fight over, and in terms of the commercial landlords, cities presume that there is very little way to intervene in private interests, private property,” said Muller Myrdahl. “My point is, well, that’s just one way of thinking about how the different stakeholders in our cities can come together.”

She continued, “It’s not just about profit margin; if we’re serious about retaining neighbourhood culture and listening to the folks in the neighbourhood, listening to the residents and the business owners and all these different stakeholders, then policy needs to reflect the role that commercial landlords have in shaping the culture of neighbourhoods.”

However, such policy change does not come easy. “There are fantastic consultation processes for getting people involved, but if they have no teeth and if the cities do not have any incentive to follow what people are saying, then what’s the point?” asked Muller Myrdahl. “Then you’re just disenfranchising people who already feel like they’re powerless.”

To illustrate the importance of engagement, Muller Mydahl referenced a recent event which might alarm involved citizens. On May 16, the City held an Open House on Vancouver’s Regional Context Statement-Official Development Plan (RCS-ODP) to plan legislation governing urban development in Vancouver. Only 22 people participated in the Open House, and this event will not be held again for another 30 years.

Muller Myrdahl lamented the city’s failure to engage the public, concluding, “Apparently the city is moving away from that strategy [of participatory engagement] and is looking toward a much more top-down set of processes . . . it’s very concerning. The focus needs to be on process, not just product.”

Convocation Week Weather Forecast

0

grad_sun

Monday, June 10: Sunny

Tuesday, June 11: Sunny with like 200 degrees out there

Wednesday, June 12: Very sunny, some sort of square hat is recommended

Thursday, June 13: Cloudy, but might reach up to 300 degrees by late afternoon

Friday, June 14: Rain Showers expected, you’re going to want a poncho or like a gown or something

Saturday, June 15: Sunny

Sunday, June 16: Sunny

14 Year Trend: Long periods of unemployment with scattered chances of jobs you hate

Coalition calls for federal decriminalization of all drugs

0

WEB-CDPC War On Drugs-Courtesy of Esquisite Photography-Flickr

Harper’s government and police oppose report’s proposal

By Sahira Memon
Photos by Patrick Down

A report published on May 23rd by the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition (CDPC) has reopened the debate as to whether or not the “war on drugs” is a justified one.

The CDPC is a partner project with the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), a research centre based at the Faculty of Health Sciences at SFU Vancouver. Its members include policy experts such as executive director Donald MacPherson, a health sciences professor at the University. The national coalition is based out of SFU’s Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction.

The CDPC’s report criticizes the aggressive stance of the Harper government’s “war on drugs,” claiming that instead of emphasizing law enforcement and punitive responses, the government should really be focusing on a harm-reduction approach.

“While countries all around the world are adopting forward-thinking, evidence-based drug policies, Canada is taking a step backwards and strengthening punitive policies that have been proven to fail,” stated a summary of the 112-page report from the CDPC.

The CDPC is now suggesting a new direction for the federal government, one that includes the decriminalization of all illicit drugs, including crack cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines. According to the coalition, the subsequent de-emphasizing of the legal response would make room for an emphasis on safe injection and support sites.

According to the Calgary Herald, Donald MacPherson, director of the CDPC and an adjunct professor with SFU’s Faculty of Health Sciences stated, “We’re doing this to improve public health and safety, not create a free-for-all. What we have now is a free-for-all.” MacPherson co-authored the report along with Connie Carter, a UVic graduate of the Department of Sociology.

While there are safe injection sites in Vancouver, such as the well-known Insite, there is an alleged lack of awareness and funding that is seriously impacting the amount of service it can provide, something the CDPC is quick to criticize.

“Where sound and relatively safe treatments exist, provincial governments and health authorities drag their feet because of outmoded ideas about some drugs or shortsighted concerns about finances,” read the summary of the CDPC report.

The CDPC gave statistical evidence for the need for what they call a “radical new direction.” According to the report, cannabis possession charges have increased by 16 per cent from 2001 to 2011. In the aftermath of the report’s release, the Harper government was asked for their opinion on this and other approaches to Canada’s “drug problem.”

“Our government has no intention of legalizing or decriminalizing any harmful, illicit substance — including heroin or crystal meth,” said Sean Phelan, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, according to The Province.

He continued, “We are pleased with the considerable progress made toward meeting the goals of the National Anti-Drug Strategy, which seeks to prevent illicit drug use, treat those with illicit drug dependencies, and combat the production and distribution of illicit drugs.”

Calgary Police Staff Sgt. Tom Hanson, speaking on behalf of the Calgary Drug Unit, also disagreed with the findings of the report, stating that “criminals would just find another way to make money.” He also mentioned that police have been trying their fair share of progressive strategies, often sending addicts to treatment rather than a jail cell.

What Your Graduation Cap Says About You . . .

0

Classic Square Academic Hat 

Gradcap1-arielmitchell

You graduated from either a university or high school and now have the minimum requirement to get some terrible job.

 

Classic Square Academic Hat Made Out of Construction Paper

LOLhat--arielmitchell

You either just graduated from kindergarten or are a character in a sitcom who got caught in a web of lies and this is part of your last ditch effort to convince your parents that you didn’t flunk out of college to become a tap-dancer. 

Jester’s Hat

Jester--arielmitchell

Your degree is a joke. Congratulations, you’ve just graduated from an elite clown college. Hopefully you’ll get into a good clown grad school, the only real money is in clowning academia. 

 

Pope Hat

pope_hat_web

Umm . . . man, I should’ve researched this more. You just graduated from, I don’t know . . . Juilliard?

 

McDonald’s Team Leader Hat

mcd_web

I could make an easy joke here about being an arts student or not graduating, but I’m not going to do that. Instead, I’m just going to say that this hat probably says that you don’t know what “graduation cap” means.

By Brad McLeod
Illustrations by Ariel Mitchell

Messages to SFU’s Graduating Class of 2013

0

“This is a great achievement and you should be very proud . . . I never graduated from university and it’s the single biggest regret of my entire life.”

-Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

 

“Way to go!”

-Chinese Proverb

 

“I love you no matter what. I’m sure this is exactly what you wanted to hear after spending the past 4 years working your ass off just to impress me.”

-Your Mother!

 
“Umm . . . I’ve got nothing.”
– Andrew Petter

 

“Congratulations and everything, but it kind of seems like a waste of time to me. Why didn’t you just start a band called the Rolling Stones?”

-Mick Jagger

 

“Live long and proper.”

-Subpar Leonard Nimoy Impersonator

Convocation expected to once again be targeted by pranksters with bagpipes

0

By Brad McLeod

BURNABY — Despite an increase in security measures for this week’s graduation ceremonies, SFU Security is still expecting the events to be infiltrated by notorious pranksters planning to once again ruin the ceremony with loud bagpipe music.

Known as the “Simon Fraser University Pipe Band,” these pranksters have made it their business to disrupt SFU’s convocation ceremonies since 1966, by showing up in front of graduating classes and making obnoxiously loud sounds with noise-makers that they call “bagpipes” and “drums.”

While campus security is doing all they can to prevent yet another bagpipe prank  (they’ve tried asking them not to and are now out of ideas), parents and graduates can be fairly confident that they will be there and should dress their ears accordingly.

Board Shorts

0

Board Shorts

Notes from the latest SFSS Board of Directors meeting.

By Alison Roach

LDC out as SUB location

Build SFU project manager Marc Fontaine presented a site evaluation document to Board that evaluated eight sites on their value to students as the possible home of the future student union building. Criteria included closeness to transportation and academic buildings, potential for “pass-through” opportunities, and possible risks and costs related to each site. Though unfinalized, the document pinpointed the lower bus loop and a site called “Greenfield South,” just near Strand Hall, as the strongest contenders for the site.

Fontaine also announced that the results of an extensive evaluation of the Lorne Davies Complex — which was previously the strongest contender for the site — showed that the building is in too poor of a condition to be the home of the future SUB. Due to structural, capacity, and relocation issues, the building is no longer under consideration.

Burritos to come to the MBC

The board passed the approval of a sublease agreement with Guadalupe Restaurants Inc., which allows the company to take space in the MBC food court, to operate under the name “Guadalupe Homemade Burritos.” The society has received a security deposit from the restaurant, and Financial Coordinator Vanessa Kwong said they were given a “standard form of lease.” The company is owned by two brothers who were trained in Texas Tex-Mex fare, and will focus exclusively on Tex-Mex style burritos. With the opening of the restaurant, The Ladle will cease to offer their veggie burritos.

Anti-Stigma Campaign

Health Sciences Faculty Rep Dhylan Verzosa presented the plan for an Anti-Stigma for Mental Health Campaign, which will focus on increasing awareness and decreasing stigma around mental health issues facing students. The Anti-Stigma campaign will create an PSA on the history of mental health to disseminate around campus, and follow up with an outreach portion of engagement and interaction with students. The SFSS contribution for the project is suggested at $2,500 to be taken out of the advocacy budget, pending FASC and board approval.

Shut Up and Listen: Gentrification of the Eastside

0


Another thrilling episode of Shut Up and Listen, which explores the gentrification of Vancouver’s downtown eastside.

 
Written and hosted by Estefania Duran
Created byJulian Giordano

SFU student could be Canada’s first quadriplegic model

1

WEB-Jessica Kreuger-Bill Hawley

Jessica Kruger is breaking boundaries in her pursuit to become the face of Something Sweet

By Alison Roach
Photos by Bill Hawley

*See update below

SFU student Jessica Kruger is challenging what our society considers to be beautiful. The 20 year old Coquitlam native is currently in first place in the Lise Watier Something Sweet modeling competition, to become the face of the cosmetic line’s new perfume. Kruger also happens to be in a wheelchair.

When she was 15, Kruger worked for a house painting company as a summer job. While on the job, Kruger had her accident. “I was two stories up and I actually fainted and fell off of the ladder,” she explained. “From that fall I broke my neck in 4 places, and that led to my spinal cord injury . . . It was a pretty big life change.”

It’s now been five years since her accident, and Kruger has spent the time recovering. Of the first years after the accident, she said, “I didn’t really go through the typical mourning that someone would have after something tragic like that happens, just because I was so focused on doing my rehab and getting back into the swing of things, getting back to school. I never really took the time to think about what happened, but the second and third year after I got back into everything it began to hit me. I definitely struggled with it for a year.”

Through recovery was a long process, Kruger says her life now is even better than it was before. “I’m definitely at the point where I’m just as happy now as I was before, and I’ve totally accepted that having that accident has changed my life for the better in so many ways and opened up so many doors for me,” she said. “It’s not something that I can be upset about; it’s just given me so many incredible opportunities.”

Kruger is now going into her fourth year at SFU, where she majors in English and hopes to later on get her PDP certificate and become an English teacher. Beyond school, Kruger is also a the only female member of the BC provincial wheelchair rugby team, and the youngest female player in Canada.

Wheelchair rugby is a notoriously vicious sport, so rough that it’s been nicknamed “murderball.” One comment on a Reddit thread about Kruger in r/vancouver described it as what would happen if “rugby had sex with a demolition derby, and the baby came out top-half human and bottom-half death machine.”

“I love it,” said Kruger, who started playing the sport shortly after her accident. “It’s definitely not hard being the only girl; [the others] totally make me feel like I’m part of the team. I don’t even notice that I’m the only girl most of the time.” Kruger also currently works with WorkSafe BC, speaking at schools and conferences about the importance of workplace safety.

Kruger’s goal now is to become the face of Lise Watier’s Something Sweet perfume, and to show our society how to broaden its narrow view of beauty. Online voting for the competition ended June 8, and the top 5 contestants out of nearly 400 are now put before a panel of judges who will decide who will be the face of Something Sweet. At press time, Kruger was sitting comfortably in first place. The contest will announce the winner in July.

While she first sent in her picture just for fun — actually, at the suggestion of a friend — Kreuger quickly realized that the competition could provide a larger opportunity.

“I realized how much attention it was getting from the community and how I could actually do something to make a difference . . . It became more of an opportunity to educate people on disabilities and to show society that somebody with a disability could be seen in an advertisement or commercial,” Kruger said.

Kruger’s message has certainly captured the interest of a huge audience, with stories on her being featured in the Huffington Post, The Province, and CTV News. “It’s been a hundred percent positive, I haven’t heard anything negative,” she said of the feedback she’s received. “I mean, there’s been posts about it on Reddit, and Reddit isn’t always reknown for being politically correct or anything like that, and even those have all been positive for the most part. I certainly cannot complain; it seems like even strangers are behind me.”

The top comment on the same Reddit post about Kruger reads, “It’s great that BC has so many awesome women with disabilities to be role models . . . but if you’re a 15-year-old girl who’s just become paralyzed in a car accident, the person who might change your life is the girl in the wheelchair who has awesome style and even does modelling.”

 *Update: Voting in the contest closed yesterday, with Kruger still in first place. The decision will now go to the judges. No specific date is listed for the final decision.

His and hers brains

0

EACHO BRAINS
New research highlights different functionality of men’s and women’s brains

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee
Illustrations by Eleanor Qu

Introduction

Have you ever felt that you just can’t understand the opposite sex? Don’t worry, you’re not alone when you can’t figure out why your girlfriend suddenly bursts into tears while you’re playing Call of Duty, or your boyfriend becomes deathly quiet during dinner with your parents. Or perhaps it’s your best friend who’s difficult to read when, after a long day at work, he doesn’t have the strength to return your texts.

Such miscommunication can leave relationships feeling pretty helpless, but don’t feel completely impotent. Recent advances in the study of the human brain have demonstrated that failing to understand the opposite sex is not all your fault; rather, some of it comes down to science.

These studies suggest that men’s and women’s brains are hardwired in very different ways, providing scientific support for the idea that women are from Venus and men are from Mars. All jokes aside, while men and women are still very similar, certain cliches like men not asking for directions or women responding emotionally are at least partially based on the different workings of the sexes’ brains.

Far from condemning the sexes to separation defined by their distinguishing characteristics, this knowledge may help men and women understand how each other’s brains work, thus helping them to improve their relationships.

 

It’s not the size, mate; it’s how you use it

It seems that Borat’s Kazakhstani doctors were right, in a sense: men’s brains are 8 to 10 per cent bigger than women’s. However, this does not mean that men are smarter than women (you wouldn’t say an elephant is smarter than a human just because its brain is larger, either); they simply have larger heads. In fact, women were shown to have greater activity than men in 112 of the 128 regions of the brain, based on the rate of blood flow to given areas while being measured by an MRI. But again, increased activity does not equal intelligence, it just means women’s brain are a lot more busy, while men’s brains are a lot quieter.

Nevertheless, there are parts of men’s and women’s brains that do differ in size, and this is significant in what it means for each sex’s nature. When a certain part of the brain is large, this is taken to mean that there is more activity happening in that sector — the person is using this part of their brain frequently. Therefore, the size of different parts of the brain in women and men can be very telling when it comes to their behaviour.

After comparing 26,000 brain scans, U.S. neuroscientist Dr Daniel Amen found that parts of the frontal lobe were proportionally larger in women than in men. This part of the brain governs decision-making and problem-solving. Additionally, women have more pre-frontal cortex brain cells — the region controlling judgment, planning and conscientiousness. This also governs impulse control, which may explain why women tend to look before they leap more than men.

In men, the parietal cortex and the amygdala covered a larger area — these parts of the brain are involved in spatial perception and the fight or flight responses, respectively. The researchers suggested this meant men would probably be able to orient themselves better in a complex building and often sense danger more quickly.

 

Pain

Sissies, pussies, girls — in our culture, men risk being called any number of names if they ever show that they feel pain. Lucky for them, men are in general less sensitive to touch and therefore feel less pain than women.

The difference is due to sex hormones: estrogen and testosterone, those tricky bastards, effect lots of changes in the human body, including the triggers in the brain that correlate to emotional and physiological experiences of pain. Women are affected more emotionally by pain than men. As such, they are more likely to report this pain and ask for sympathy. When men do the same, our culture labels this as being weak or feminine.

Just as women are more sensitive to pain than men, they’re also three times more likely to experience migraines. Again, we can in part thank fluctuating hormones, but the main cause is the female brain’s intrinsic excitability. According to animal-based research by Dr Andrew Charles, director of the headache research and treatment programme at the University of California, women’s brains react more strongly to stimulus — lights, noise, movement — which in turn causes migraines. In men, the stimulus needs to be three times bigger than this to cause a migraine. What is this, a stimulus for ants?

 

Mental Illness

Recent studies have provided much knowledge that can help the sexes better understand each other, but they also provide information about what to expect in the future. Reports surrounding dementia, Alzheimer’s, and depression (while not authoritative in their predictions) can help us know to some extent what to expect when we’re old.

Women have better long-term memories than men as a result of increased activity in the hippocampus. While this might not be a surprise to the countless girlfriends who need to remind their significant others of their anniversary or birthdays, what might be shocking is how this affects mature women.

Nearly seven per cent of women over the age of 75 have some form of dementia, compared with five per cent of men. Women also have faster cognitive decline than men, meaning diseases like Alzheimer’s affect women more quickly and fatally (20 per cent more women die of Alzheimer’s than men).

The severity of Alzheimer’s can be traced to the effects of estrogen and testosterone. These hormones protect against neurodegeneration, but after early menopause — defined as occurring before 48 — estrogen levels for women drop dramatically. Scientists believe early menopause, especially if women have had partial hysterectomies, aka their ovaries removed, the likelihood of these women developing Alzheimer’s can increase by 70 per cent.

Are these statistics bringing you down, ladies? That, too, can be explained by science. Differences in the limbic area (emotional processor) of the brain also make women more likely to view situations negatively. This means women tend to worry more, and sleep less, which can cause depression. In fact, women are twice as likely to experience major depression than men.

However, there is hope. Women show rapid response to antipsychotic medication, most likely because of how the medication reacts with estrogen. Men aren’t as fortunate in this respect, and have a more difficult time recovering from mental illness.

They are also twice as likely to develop schizophrenia than women, especially concentrated within the 15 to 25 age range. This may be a result of men’s inferior parietal lobule, which is 16 per cent smaller as compared to women. This crucial part of the brain affects the visual, auditory, and key sensory areas — areas which, when out of whack, result in schizophrenia.
brains

Feed me, Seymour

A lot of people might be under the misconception that men can eat and eat and eat and never gain a pound, while women have to be really careful about their diet or else risk gaining weight. Science suggests this might be an exercise in madness: women need to eat more than men to feel as satiated. Studies have shown that on average, women have reduced activity in the hypothalamus, which controls feelings of hunger. Therefore, they have to eat more to activate it into creating a sense of feeling full.

Cravings between the sexes also vary: women crave sugar and fat, while men crave meat. Scientists point to an evolutionary basis for these differences, as men have traditionally needed to hunt, survive, and pass on their genes. On the contrary, women traditionally needed more fat stores to help the babies they were responsible for having to develop.

Excess fat stores also help produce sex hormones such as estrogen. Scientists propose that it’s these hormones that may cause the differences in cravings, explaining why women’s cravings may change during their menstrual cycle when estrogen levels are higher. Chocolate, anyone?

 

Stressing out

It’s fairly obvious that everyone responds to stress in different ways. Some may retreat into seclusion, others might lash out aggressively. These responses are controlled by an almond-sized part of the brain called the amygdala. This part of the brain processes fear, aggression and action — action that differs greatly between men and women.

The male amygdala is activated to a greater extent on the right side. This triggers the ‘fight or flight’ response, and so men under stress may deal best with it by letting off some steam or having space for themselves.

The female amgydala is more active on the left side, which activates the brain’s attachment system and releases more of the hormone oxytocin. This section is associated with feelings of love, calm, protection, and safety, and triggers what has been dubbed the “tend and befriend” response. Therefore, it makes sense that a woman would want to share with friends and receive assurance during stressful times. It makes double sense that a man might not understand why a stressed out female would need his support, seeing as how the male response would be one of self-help and/or isolation.

 

Reading emotions

One of the most curious differences between men and women involves men’s failure to understand women’s emotions. Although better at reading the emotions of other men, male subjects had twice as much trouble interpreting women’s emotions from images of their eyes.

When the men looked at images of other men’s eyes, parts of the amygdala tied to empathy and fear activated more strongly than when the men looked at images of women’s eyes. Other parts of the male brain connected with emotion also failed to react when trying to understand the women’s feelings.

This “theory of mind” — the ability to understand others’ emotions and to understand that others have beliefs, desires, and intentions that are different from one’s own — is a crucial component of empathy, the deficit of which could mean men have lower levels of empathy relative to women.

But why do they understand the emotions of men better than those of women? It’s not just a symptom of bromance. One possible explanation is that men have been conditioned in our patriarchal society to pay less attention to women’s emotions. Considering a more evolutionary explanation once again, it might be that men’s better understanding of other men’s emotions came from their need to predict and foresee the intentions and actions of male rivals.

 

Conclusion

It would not be fair to say that these findings are universal and conclusive; some of the information has been called into question, based on the research methods involved as well as other processes. Additionally, this wiring does not mean that our reactions are completely predetermined. In any circumstance, there is a high degree of choice and situational factors at play. Events in one’s past could also affect, and perhaps overrule, how the brain is wired; whether the relations between the sexes will be attributed to nature or nurture in the end is left to be seen.

In any case, it seems fair to say that how we respond to many situations is affected, at least in part, by how our brain is wired. However, this information is not meant to be used an excuse; it is instead a path towards greater comprehension. By understanding how we function, it becomes easier to analyse how we react to different circumstances and improve how we communicate. Similarly, it’s important to know how members of the other sex process so that we can properly interpret their actions. This isn’t to say that there isn’t diversity within the sexes, but science is bringing us closer to bridging the gap.