Home Blog Page 1202

Rebellious teen has nose pierced despite no objections from parents

0

YOUR REGION — In a dramatic show of her free spirit, “can’t be tamed” attitude, a 16 year-old girl in your area has decided to go through with piercing her nose even after her parents told her it was okay.

“I don’t care if they’re totally cool with it, I fucking did it anyways,” explained Janis Hopperman, whose parents have also posed no problem with her using the occasional swear word. “And you know what? I’m going to go to that concert downtown tomorrow night even after they agreed to drive me there.”

Friends of Hopperman are not surprised in the least by her gutsy decision to go through with the piercing even with her parents’ consent, and say she’s always acting out within the boundaries.

“She’s such a rebel,” fawned schoolmate Alexis Brill who said she couldn’t even imagine piercing her nose if her parents were supportive of it. “I wouldn’t be surprised if she gets a tattoo that her parents agree is appropriate next . . . she’s just that much of a loose-cannon.”

According to Hopperman’s parents they’re happy to allow her to make her own decisions as long as she continues to get good grades and stay out of trouble.

“Yeah, my parents tried to tell me that I could only get my nose pierced if I made the honour roll,” Hopperman said with a snide grin. “So I just like, worked really hard, made them proud and then got this piercing, like, you know fuckin’ whatever.”

Way-too-early Stanley Cup predictions

0

The 2013-2014 National Hockey League season is now past the quarter mark, and contenders for this year’s Stanley Cup finals have begun to emerge. It’s still too early to predict a winner, but one thing is for certain: the Edmonton Oilers won’t be winning the Cup this year.

So who is going to be crowned NHL champion?  The preseason darling in the media was the Pittsburgh Penguins, but Marc Andre Fleury has been known to crumble in the postseason. Add in back up Tomas Vokoun’s blood clots and Pittsburgh’s goaltending situation gets a whole lot murkier.

The defending champs, the Chicago Blackhawks, are another hot choice. What people are forgetting is how much last year’s Cup-winning hero Dave Bolland, since traded to the Toronto Maple Leafs, meant to the Blackhawks. The feisty center killed penalties and shut down opposing top lines; Bolland was built for playoff hockey. The Hawks have the talent, but does power forward Bryan Bickell offer enough grit to carry the Blackhawks through the grind and replace Bolland? Only time will tell.

Then there are this year’s two surprise teams: the Colorado Avalanche and Anaheim Ducks.  Head coach Patrick Roy has his young Avalanche squad playing well beyond its years, but they’ll slow down soon and the team is too inexperienced when it comes to playoff hockey.  Captain Gabriel Landeskog only turns 21 on Nov. 23 and has yet to get a taste of playoff hockey. The Avalanche are definitely on the upswing, but aren’t all the way there quite yet.

Anaheim has a core group of players that have tasted hockey glory in Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry. The main concern is depth, or lack thereof. The Ducks have a great top six, but their bottom six leaves much to be desired. The Stanley Cup is won with the grinders as much as it is won with the superstars, and Anaheim does not boast a strong third or fourth line.

The early picks to represent the Eastern and Western conference in the finals? The Boston Bruins and St Louis Blues, with St Louis eventually winning it all.

Boston made the finals last year behind the strong play of goaltender Tuukka Rask but general manager Peter Chiarelli actually improved his squad by adding veterans Loui Eriksson and Jarome Iginla.  Add in strong blue line play from youngster Torey Krug and the Bruins have another championship-calibre squad on their hands.

St Louis on the other hand is seemingly built for playoff hockey. They have a playoff series-stealing-calibre goaltender in Jaroslav Halak, who did just that for Montreal in 2010. They boast the NHL’s leading goal scorer, so far, in Alexander Steen, who’s a big body with a ton of skill.  They have budding superstar defenseman Alex Pietrangelo and a ton of depth up and down their roster.

If recent playoffs have taught us anything, it’s that depth is the key to postseason success, and St Louis has that in spades. With veteran Brenden Morrow leading young guns TJ Oshie and Vladimir Tarasenko, the Blues have tremendous upside.

The National Hockey League boasts incredible parity among its teams, so it may turn out that the next league champion isn’t even mentioned here. But that is what makes the NHL so great; nothing is set in stone, definitely not a Stanley Cup prediction made in mid-November.

The b-sides of Vancouver

0

CMYK-Moon Glow Cabaret 331 East Georgia 1960s

When Vancouver Was Awesome first made its way onto my desk, a couple of questions immediately formed: 1) Are they implying that Vancouver is no longer awesome, that we have done something to it to make it no longer as great as it once was? And,  2) why is it that no other city has ever had to try so hard to prove its awesomeness?

The coffee table book — part historical account, part celebratory tome — is authored by Lani Russwurm, writer and regular contributor for the blog by the similar name, Vancouver Is Awesome. In a forward, VIA founder Bob Kronbauer recounts the driving force of the blog, and its subsequent offshoot, Vancouver Was Awesome: “The rules were simple . . . only post stories about what makes Vancouver awesome.”

The manageable 159-page account is separated into three chapters, distinguished by particular moments of historical importance in Vancouver: “The Wild Old West: 1910 and Earlier,” “Terminal City: 1911 – 1939,” and “Modern Times: 1940 – 1972.”

Though framed by Vancouver’s vivacious but short timeline, the photographs and stories are a mixed grab-bag, or, as described by Russwurm, “a mix-tape approach to history.” Defining historical events, like the arrival of George Vancouver, are bookended by “B-sides,” like “The Wreck of the Beaver,” a tugboat that was grounded, and eventually sunk, by its drunk crew in 1888. The British Columbia Archives, City of Vancouver Archives, and CBC — among other notable organizations — have helped supply archival material to accompany the stories, bringing history to life on each page.

What Vancouver Was Awesome does well is create accessible, bite-size content for those who think 150 years is too short for an awesome history to emerge.

The second chapter does a particularly good job of illuminating the little-known and short-lived jazz age of Vancouver, creating a narrative that starts with the implementation of prohibition in 1917 and runs into a detailed account of the Patricia Cabaret’s boasting of “Real Jazz Band Music.”

The following pages feature black and white photos of Jelly Roll Morton and Ada “Bricktop” Smith. Jelly Roll played at the Patricia on occasion, and later returned to form the house-band for Patty Sullivan’s club on 768 Granville Street; and Ada spent two years performing in Vancouver before establishing, with the help of Cole Porter, the famous Chez Bricktop in Paris.

The book is peppered with such accounts of celebrity, but is not bogged down by it; these details — from Charlie Chaplin’s visit to the Orpheum Theatre in 1911 to Hunter S. Thompson’s appeal to write for the Vancouver Sun in 1958 — illustrate a city drawing the world into its own slowly-forming identity — one that is still in the works.

It is not a comprehensive history, but what Vancouver Was Awesome does well is create accessible, bite-size content for those who think 150 years is too short for an awesome history to emerge. Russwurm is aware of the metropolitan city’s controversial past, and does a good job of noting the kind of subtleties long ignored by history books: the long-time establishment of Musqueam and Squamish communities, the razing of Hogan’s Alley (Vancouver’s black neighbourhood) by the construction of the Georgia Viaduct, and the efforts of workers on the On to Ottawa Trek with the theme of “Work and Wages.”

The book, visually and narratively mapped like a patchwork of emerging moments, mimics the very city it represents: richly diverse, eclectic, contradictory, and determined — it is a box of forgotten photographs under your grandfather’s bed, a postcard tucked away in a dusty memoir. In an age of rapid gentrification and rising real-estate prices, Vancouver Was Awesome asks us to grapple with what we had and what we might have done instead; it defiantly proclaims awesomeness, then and now, despite the naysayers.

And that’s pretty awesome.

LGBTQ rights are human rights

0

In early November, on a bus in California, a 17 year-old boy allegedly set fire to the skirt of self-identified agendered teen, inflicting second and third-degree burns all over their body.

I’m outraged by this. I’m outraged by the fact that someone can be so compelled to hate and so compelled to hurt someone else over the insignificant act of choosing different clothing, or over something so personal as their gender or sexuality. I’m outraged that someone was hurt due to this compulsion.

And as much as I would love to speak simply about how much this outrages me, I’m discouraged at the prospect. Aside from the story, what else is there to talk about? Everyone that will be outraged is outraged. Simply stating that this upsets me seems to side with those who respect modern gender/sexuality definitions and human rights against those who don’t. And it seems impossible to change the minds of those who don’t.

How will standing on one side of the debate berating the ignorance of those on the other help solve the problem? Berating is not respecting the deeply ingrained beliefs that make someone feel this way; it addresses the symptoms, not the problem.

Regardless, if we have the chance to say anything, we must. Even if all we can think to do is berate; even if we feel one side of a debate is exhausted. We have to keep talking, keep debating matters that raise concerns as serious as this one. If a topic is important enough to arouse an opinion, it’s never worthless to join in a conversation about it.

We need to think and talk about the fact that, in the modern world, people’s lives are destroyed for something as personal as their sexuality. We can’t just leave it to the LGBTQ groups, or those affected by the issue directly to think about it.

In the past, I’ve considered myself lucky for not subscribing to a non-binary gender, for not being able to be tortured like that Californian teen. But I’m not lucky, and he and others aren’t unlucky. As much as I am unlucky to have brown hair because some like red better, or unlucky to have green eyes when some prefer brown, my gender subscription is neutral in the matter.

When people are attacked for wearing clothing of their choice, our society is out of luck. These aren’t problems of ignorant teenagers, or problems to be left to the LGBTQ community; these are problems that concern human rights.

So long as we’re human, we can’t ignore when this happens. We can’t shut this out, call ourselves lucky, and try to let these problems rest on someone else. If you’re given the chance to think about it, do so. Speak about it. Debate it. Vote on it. Not because you can, but because you have to.

Clan split doubleheader against Broncos

0

The Clan women’s basketball team opened their 2013 non-conference season with a split weekend in California. After travelling south for their second road trip of the season, the ladies swapped wins with the Cal Poly Pomona Broncos, in two thrilling games.

In the first game of the doubleheader, the visitors fell by two points, despite an exciting second half comeback that showcased their ability as a team. The Clan started shaky, falling behind by 12 points before the half, shooting only 38 per cent from the floor. But in the second half they staged a period-long comeback, tying the game at 64 with just over two minutes to play.

The Broncos were able to shut them out over the final few minutes, taking the first match of the double header 66–64. Senior Rebecca Langmead earned her first double-double of the season, keeping the Clan in the game with 15 points and 17 rebounds on the night, while co-captain Erin Chambers led the Clan with 20 points. The loss gave the
Clan plenty of motivation for round two.

Less than 24-hours later, the two teams hit the floor for a rematch, both one game stronger, and more knowledgeable about the other. This time it was the Clan who were able to hold off their opponents, winning 73–64. Chambers again led the Clan offence, with 21 points in the game.

For the second straight night, SFU started slower than they would have liked, leading by only one point at the half. In the second period, however, the team came to play, holding the Broncos to 25 per cent shooting from the floor, and dominating the boards in the final 20 minutes. Sophomore Meg Wilson led the Clan in rebounds with ten, while senior Marie-Line Petit brought her experience to the Clan’s campaign finishing with 14 points, six assists, four rebounds and three steals on the night.

The Clan will continue their non-conference schedule at home on Nov. 22, hosting two games against the San Francisco State Gators as well asanother doubleheader against the Academy of Art Urban Nights next  weekend. These non-conference games will help prepare the ladies for their Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC) season which opens against their cross-border and GNAC championship rivals, Western Washington; the Clan will need all the preparation they can manage.

The Vikings visit the Clan on Dec. 7 for what will prove to be a telling game for the rest of the season. SFU and WWU were ranked third and fourth in the pre-season conference poll respectively, and the Clan will be looking to demonstrate their capabilities in their GNAC opener and set the tone for the remainder of the 2013-14 season.

Minds of the Moment #2

0

The Peak is seeking a videographer!

0

The Peak is looking for a videographer!

If you want to make money filming, we want your application.

The job description is still in progress, so we can’t provide complete details at the moment, but the successful applicant will have the opportunity to help design the position. You will be the Multimedia Editor’s technical assistant while creating The Peak’s video content, so applicants must know how to operate a camera and microphone rig. As most of the work will happen on Fridays, we will expect you to be free for most of that day. The successful applicant will be paid $150 per week, every week that The Peak is published, and the position will last for the Spring semester, with the possibility of extensions.

Does this sound good to you? Send a cover letter and resume to [email protected] , or contact [email protected] to ask any questions.

Respect your server

1

Ben editorial cartoon serversAfter working a few years in a restaurant, I’ve become all too accustomed to the short fuses of dining customers. I’ve witnessed and played host to some astounding and unnecessary behaviour from displeased customers who unfairly claim they are being “mistreated” who scrutinize over the most minuscule problems or misunderstand how a restaurant is managed entirely.

Treating restaurant or any other servers like they’re second-class citizens has to change. As is, this treatment reflects our society as being pampered and unsympathetic.

A server’s job is incredibly difficult. The amount of multitasking and time-management it involves, including running back and forth between customers, taking care of payments, and ensuring customer satisfaction is both mentally and physically exhausting. When customers become angry for insignificant issues, this only adds to the stress that servers are already inundated with.

I am personally disappointed and disturbed by the unnecessary aggression, carelessness and self-centered nature that many restaurant-goers do not hesitate to display. Engulfed in their sense of what good customer service should be, agonizing over food not matching their specific tastes or agonizing over countless other meagre problems with a restaurant, they fail to recognize the weighted stress that servers are under — though they are apparently aware of their own position that allows them to power-trip over servers.

Customers angry over insignificant issues only adds to the stress servers are inundated with.

I once had a customer send back a plate of fish after he accused me of over-cooking it. Once, I distinctly remember a customer physically threaten a couple of my co-servers over a simple miscommunication. And, in an extreme case, I once had a young dissatisfied couple yell obscenities at me before fleeing the restaurant without paying. We had the police on them in no time.

If you have never worked in a restaurant and/or find these reactions justified, then let me enlighten you: servers are the people who serve your food. They typically do not prepare your food, but are the mediator between you and kitchen. We’ve all heard the phrase “don’t shoot the messenger.” Here, this could not apply more.

I am disgusted to recognize how this restaurant-culture behaviour reflects our society. We are, evidently, one that likes to complain for its own sake. We are so used to being pampered that, if even the smallest thing does not go exactly to our liking, we have no problem in vocalizing our distastes through unnecessary aggression. It’s time for us to lighten up, get over ourselves, and become a little more understanding.

The next time you go to a restaurant for a meal, treat your servers like people. Be extra friendly to them, in light of their job being possibly one of the most difficult customer-service jobs around. Think twice before you complain. If you have a problem with what you’ve been given, take your complaint to those actually deserving, such as the cooks or the restaurant manager. Please, maintain your dignity and don’t be ignorant. Show servers the respect they really deserve.

Political Accountability and Crack Cocaine

0

Estefania Duran discusses Canadian politics with Will Ross, Leah Bjornson and Adam Ovenel-Carter.

Questions? Comments? Reach us at [email protected]

Hosted by Estefania Duran. Created by Brandon Hillier.

SFU loses top spot in Maclean’s rankings

1

WEB-parties over-Mark Burnham

Maclean’s 2014 University Rankings were published Oct. 31 and, for the first time in six years, SFU is not the number one comprehensive university, beaten out by the University of Victoria (UVic) for the top spot.

SFU has been ranked the top comprehensive university in Canada a total of ten times since Maclean’s started publishing rankings 21 years ago, and was on a five-year streak in the top spot from 2008 to 2012.

Each year, Maclean’s publishes three sets of university rankings under three separate categories: medical doctoral, comprehensive, and primarily undergraduate. Universities in the comprehensive category show a significant amount of research activity and have a wide range of programs at the undergraduate and graduate level.

All three rankings are based on six main categories: students and classes, faculty, resources, student support, library, and reputation. Mount Allison University topped the primarily undergraduate category, and McGill University came in first among institutions under the medical doctoral category.

The Peak spoke to SFU VP Academic, Dr. Jon Driver, about the new rankings and how SFU administration reacts to rankings such as Maclean’s.

“Rankings are interesting, because they are fairly crude attempts to measure very complex institutions,” said Driver. “On the one hand we recognized that what goes on at SFU, both in terms of teaching and in terms of research, is a very complicated story and it really can’t capture them so easily in rankings.”

Driver pointed to a significant drop in SFU’s ranking under scholarships and bursaries as especially concerning.

 

He continued, “On the other hand, we always pay attention to rankings, because they do influence public opinion about the university, [and] they influence student choices about whether or not to come to a particular university.”

Driver described university rankings as a tool for university administration to focus in on areas of possible concern, and address potential problems. In comparison with last year’s rankings, SFU went up in three of the judged categories and down in three, while UVic had scores go up in two categories and down in four. “That’s a bit of a conundrum for us,” laughed Driver.

Driver explained that SFU administration will be looking into the math and the data supporting the rankings, and checking that all information that was submitted to Maclean’s was accurate. He pointed specifically to a significant drop in SFU’s ranking under scholarships and bursaries as especially concerning.

Last year SFU was ranked sixth among the 15 comprehensive universities for contributions to student scholarships and bursaries. This year, that ranking has slipped to 12th.

“This appears at first look to be a really strange change, a really significant change. That’s the area that causes me the biggest concern, and I am fairly sure that that change in our ranking is probably what’s driving the move from being first to second position,” said Driver.

He continued, “If this really is a significant change for SFU and it’s not caused by the methodology or something like that, and presuming that the data are correct, we will have to take a hard look at how much we are contributing to scholarships and bursaries.”

When it comes to UVic taking the top spot, Driver had nothing but encouraging things to say. “I think it’s wonderful that the two comprehensive universities from British Columbia are sitting at one and two,” he said. “I think it says a great deal about the quality of both of those universities, the quality of the faculty members, the quality of the students, and the attention that both universities pay to trying to create the best educational experience we can.”

In 2012, President Andrew Petter cautiously celebrated the university’s success in international rankings writing: “I’m reluctant to attach too much significance to university rankings given their selective criteria and varied methodologies. But it’s hard not to take some small satisfaction from the recent reports of two leading international ratings,” alluding to the Times Higher Education (THE) and QS rankings.

Last year, in the THE 100 Under 50, SFU placed 26th in the world, and third in Canada. In the QS Top 50 Under 50, SFU was ranking 30th in the world, and second in Canada.