Go back

SFU history department shuts down because “who cares, what’s done is done”

Students describe history profs as “starving for literally anything new to happen”

Written by Marco Ovies, Arts Editor

On Friday, SFU’s incoming president Joy Johnson announced her plans to shut down SFU’s Department of History. The university hosted a Town Hall in Images Theatre for students to discuss the future of the school’s history programs.

“Who cares about history?” Johnson pointed out to the crowd, to raucous applause. “It already happened! It’s over! What’s done is done!”

Students were vocal in supporting Johnson’s announcement, joining in a chant of “Liberty Bell! Disappointing and dumb!” throughout the assembly. Some students even feel that the department staff will benefit from being ousted.

“These profs act all upset, but secretly they really want things shaken up. We can all tell,” says Hank Balarmey, a first year student in attendance. “Don’t believe it? Take literally any history class ever and see if they have any fresh conversational material. Those history people think they do — but they don’t. They’re literally studying the history of history now . . . pretty soon they’re going to run out of excuses to keep going. 

“They are starving for literally anything new to happen and nothing could be better than unemployment.”

Despite Balarmey’s assurances, however, faculty appeared truly off-put by Johnson’s announcements.

“SFU is acting like President Hoover during the Great Depression,” said Dr. Blank, history professor at SFU. “They just don’t give a dam.” Blank spent the Town Hall stabbing his Caesar salad to the rhythm of “Rasputin” by Boney M., before storming out in protest to one of his dingy 5000-level tutorial rooms in the AQ.

SFU’s Department of History is infamous for starting in 1965 as an SFSS club, meeting weekly to reminisce over the “good old days” in high school. Eventually, they ran out of grudges to loudly pretend to have gotten over, and quickly moved on to their elementary school days, their toddler years, and their babyhoods. Upon arriving at throwbacks to water breaking, the history department was born, in search of ever more things in the past to dwell on.

In fact, in a final tribute to the department’s roots, SFU encourages history majors and minors to see Academic Advising, where they can have “HIST 000: Peaking In High School” added to their transcripts as course credit to satisfy all remaining graduation requirements.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

StudyTok promotes a problematic approach to learning

By: Maya Barillas Mohan, Staff Writer You may have heard of StudyTok. It’s a niche community with guides on creating effective flashcards, instructions for prettier handwriting, and all-nighter study marathon timelapses. University life has long been romanticized online. Education is largely a path to a better future, but inspirational study content can turn TikTok into a theatre for classism and self-hate.  These videos are revered for their aesthetic, though they tend to centre social privilege under the guise of elite work ethics. The neatly staged videos suggest an irrefutable correlation between discipline and rewarding outcomes. Instead of encouraging peers, StudyTok becomes another place for the privileged to flaunt and attribute their success to themselves entirely. TikTok has multiple other toxic “sides” focused on the embellishment of...

Read Next

Block title

StudyTok promotes a problematic approach to learning

By: Maya Barillas Mohan, Staff Writer You may have heard of StudyTok. It’s a niche community with guides on creating effective flashcards, instructions for prettier handwriting, and all-nighter study marathon timelapses. University life has long been romanticized online. Education is largely a path to a better future, but inspirational study content can turn TikTok into a theatre for classism and self-hate.  These videos are revered for their aesthetic, though they tend to centre social privilege under the guise of elite work ethics. The neatly staged videos suggest an irrefutable correlation between discipline and rewarding outcomes. Instead of encouraging peers, StudyTok becomes another place for the privileged to flaunt and attribute their success to themselves entirely. TikTok has multiple other toxic “sides” focused on the embellishment of...

Block title

StudyTok promotes a problematic approach to learning

By: Maya Barillas Mohan, Staff Writer You may have heard of StudyTok. It’s a niche community with guides on creating effective flashcards, instructions for prettier handwriting, and all-nighter study marathon timelapses. University life has long been romanticized online. Education is largely a path to a better future, but inspirational study content can turn TikTok into a theatre for classism and self-hate.  These videos are revered for their aesthetic, though they tend to centre social privilege under the guise of elite work ethics. The neatly staged videos suggest an irrefutable correlation between discipline and rewarding outcomes. Instead of encouraging peers, StudyTok becomes another place for the privileged to flaunt and attribute their success to themselves entirely. TikTok has multiple other toxic “sides” focused on the embellishment of...