Home Blog Page 752

SFU students break down ‘invisible walls’ to climate action

0
SFU student Rhiannon Wallace performing a monologue at the event.

Although many people are aware of climate change issues, some may feel that they are unable to take action to change the situation. These often invisible barriers are what inspired a group of interdisciplinary SFU students to take on this event.  

The Invisible Wall team collected stories about students’ struggles with action in the face of climate change and turned them into a series of monologues showcased at the Café Deux Soleil on February 5.

The event drew a large crowd of students and community members to examine their own inaction and ways to overcome it.

“Our vision was to explore the invisible walls — invisible because we don’t often talk about them — the walls to action whether that be climate action or another form of action,” explained Jessie Russell, a student in environmental sciences and organizer of The Invisible Wall.

The students hope that the audience took away a better understanding of the reasons people are not involved in action or came to identify with the stories told by the performers, Russell said.

Initially, the organizers compiled anecdotes before reaching out to contributors to perform their stories and reconstructed anonymous submissions into monologues. “A lot of the pieces that were written as amalgamations of many voices touched on the fear of being alone in action, the fear of being overwhelmed in taking action,” Russell explained. “And then some of the pieces that were shared by those who wrote them touched on a variety of issues including more external [societal] barriers.”

The whole idea was originally just spontaneous and between friends, but grew into a five-month extracurricular project to engage the public around these issues.

“One of our core organizers [. . .] she’s aware of a lot of the issues and feels incredibly overwhelmed by the issues, but there is not necessarily any outlet to talk about the barriers to why we might not take action on climate change,” Russell said.

“We aren’t a club. We’re just a bunch of students who were interested in organizing an event so that we could talk about issues that are not talked about enough.”

The team consisted of international studies students Prodpran Wangcherdchuwong, Nicolas Tellez-España, and Scott Takenaka; Jessie Russell and Tessa Ramburn who are in environmental sciences; Ted Hinkle in communication; and recent SFU alum Leena Hasan. Ever since they started the project, Russell said the response has been huge and people seemed really taken by the idea of discussing a topic which is often overlooked.

“I think one of my favourite things about this particular project is that we didn’t have an agenda, and so what I really loved about it was the opportunity for the monologues to speak for themselves, to contradict each other, to maybe come from such a different reality,” Russell noted.  

SFU softball season preview

0
Last season SFU finished with 12–16 conference record, good enough for sixth overall.

After narrowly missing the playoffs last year, SFU softball begins their 2017 campaign as they travel to Hawaii this weekend for four pre-season double-headers. Reflecting on last season, head coach Mike Renney believes his team was just a few steps away from a playoff berth.

“I think that last season, if anything, we probably missed peaking by about two weeks and that probably made the difference. We were coming off a marginal season the year before and probably took a bit longer than we’d like to get the belief we needed.

“There was also a bit of us running out of gas at the end – we had a few rainouts which meant we had to play back-to-back-to-back right after the exam period, so our athletes were both physically and mentally exhausted.

With six seniors having departed the softball program at the end of last season, all eyes will be on experienced players such as Tori Belton, Kendra Goodman, and Robyn Mogavero to lead the team into the new campaign. Renney’s team has also been boosted with a promising freshman class, with new faces like Jada Yeo and Courtney De Adder coming into the program for 2017.

“Typically, we rely on the athletes we have in house that have been waiting for their chance off the bench, so it’s not too common for a freshman to see a lot of playing time. Having said that, we also have some spots that are wide open. Invariably, we’ll have some opportunities to see freshmen in those positions,” Renney said.

“I think we’ve got some very good young talent, but you can’t teach experience — you have to live it. We don’t want to throw [the young players] into the deep end too soon; we want to get them transitioned to university demands and the style of play. High school to university is also a big jump academically, so there’s always a transition period.”

Like a number of their Clan contemporaries, the team’s preparations for the new season have been affected by the record-breaking snowfall seen in the past few months. Renney admitted the winter has posed a unique set of challenges as he looks to ready his team for their opening matches.

“I can’t remember a worse winter [in his time at SFU],” said Renney.

“I think we’ve got some very good young talent, but you can’t teach experience — you have to live it.”

“Our preparation at this time of year means we’ve [been] outside for a good eight to 10 practices at this time of year. Because of the snow, we’ve been relying on the gymnasiums in the early hours of the morning, because that’s the only time we can get the facilities. Our typical day right now starts at 6 a.m., and the players are in classes by 9 or 10 a.m.

“Our infielders are seeing hardwood bounces and they’re about to play on dirt in a few days. Our outfielders are seeing fly balls no higher than the roof of the gym, and I can assure you they’re going to see balls that’ll travel significantly higher. The Christmas snow also caused our batting cage to collapse, so it’s literally been a perfect storm for us.”

However, Renney insisted his side will be fully prepared for their upcoming conference schedule, beginning the season with a trip to Hawaii this weekend.

“The first thing we’re going to do when we get to Hawaii is get outside and get our infielders on the dirt and our outfielders on the grass to get them familiarised with the environment. Having said that, we’re behind the eight-ball from the start. We always want to have success, but our success won’t necessarily be measured in wins or losses; it’ll be measured in growth and development.”

The conference kicks off with a home doubleheader against Northwest Nazarene University at Beedie Field on March 3, and Renney believes his team is more than capable of being better than last year.

“It’s challenging. I know every one of our rivals is outside right now on the grass, and we’re not. It’s one of the challenges of living on a mountain, but it’s nothing we haven’t overcome before, and it’s an obstacle we have to adapt to.

“One of the things we always want to shoot for is a playoff berth. You battle to get in the playoffs, then you let the cards fall as they may. With our athletes, I fully expect we’ll be competitive. If we’re able to get up to speed quick enough, then we’ll be OK.”

SFU track and field finish with encouraging performance in Hillsdale Classic

0
Addy Townsend (right) won the 800-metre with a personal best time of 2:10.27 seconds.

The SFU track and field team travelled to the Hillsdale Classic for the first time this past weekend, bringing 12 athletes that had made provisional standard. “It was a last-minute decision for us to go there,” said coach Brit Townsend, citing the track conversions on the smaller track as a reason for going (all times in this article will factor the track conversions). The decision certainly seemed to be a good one, as Simon Fraser performed admirably.

Daniel Kelloway had a standout performance, as he ended up winning the 400-metre and had a meet record with a time of 47.95 seconds. It was the senior’s fastest time of the season, as he fell just short of qualifying for nationals. Joel Webster improved his time in the 400-metre as well.   

In the women’s sprints, freshman Katherine Lucas continued to impress. She improved her times in both the 60-metre and 200-metre sprints, finishing with a personal best in the 200-metre with a time of 24.78 seconds.

Addy Townsend was spectacular, as she won the 800-metre with a personal best time of 2:10.27 seconds. She is ranked eighth in the nation and is now qualified to compete in nationals.

Also placing first was the men’s 4×400-metre relay team, finishing with a provisional-mark-shattering time of 3:16.88. The team consisted of Nathan Mah, Joel Webster, Daniel Kelloway, and Vladislav Tsygankov.

Tsygankov also competed in the long jump, finishing with a season-best jump of 7.07 metres. A very impressive performance, especially when considering the training conditions for Tsygankov and the rest of the Simon Fraser track and field team.  

Due to the snow, Simon Fraser’s training has been everything but traditional. When coach Townsend was asked how these conditions have affected the team, she responded with, “It’s frustrating for sure, a couple weeks ago we spent hours and hours shoveling the track.”

With the snow coming again recently, the team has trained by “treadmills, parking lots, bikes, ellipticals, everything that we can do,” said Townsend. Jumpers like Tsygankov have been unable to jump into a pit for months. “We thought that was gone, now we’re going into the most important part of the season and the snow is back.”

Even in these less-than-ideal conditions, coach Townsend motivates her team. “My message to them is to believe in their strength, to be positive, and to learn to adapt to adversity because it will make them stronger.”

All things considered, this event must be seen as encouraging for the Clan. After competing in this event for the first time, it is now “something that we’ll definitely consider for next year,” said coach Townsend.

The Clan will next travel to Washington to compete in the Husky Classic meet on Friday, before the conference meet next Wednesday. Coach Townsend is very excited about the women’s team saying, “We could place higher than we’ve ever placed at the conference.”

Living wireless: the last day in a week from hell

0

This is the seventh and final post in a week-long web series that documents Preethi’s day-to-day experiences while forgoing a relationship with her cellphone.

On my last day of my challenge, I learnt that birds observe us as much as we observe them. This isn’t as random as you think and has been the best part of my seven-day challenge. As I stood outside my house, waiting for a friend, I was looking around and snacked on a KitKat. I observed that a bird flew to a nearby tree, and I ate some more of my KitKat.

However, I glanced back at the bird and felt as if it had been observing me the entire time. I looked away and back at the bird — the bird looked away. Four or five times, I repeated to look away and had a gut feeling that the bird was very conscious of my activities. My point? If I had my phone, I would have noticed none of this.

I reached and activated my phone well before midnight and felt an adrenaline rush through my body as I had texts and notifications to go through. As I cleared all of them, a wave of emptiness rushed as well. I fathomed the temporary satisfaction my device gave me, and calmly put it away as I fell asleep reading a book.

I viewed the seven-day challenge as an opportunity to prove that I wasn’t addicted to my phone.

But the number of times I thought about my phone was pathetic and I stand corrected. The seven days threw at me realizations on a spectrum, and my records tell all of it. The superficiality that we embody on social media, the addictive traits of using phones, and the reasons why we keep going back for more every 10 minutes — these lessons will probably be hard to keep in mind once I go back to my routine.

The most important lesson, however, was to be aware of myself while using a phone. It isn’t true that I have no control over the “storm” within me. I’ve decided that no passivity is going to help you or me navigate the digital world. But there is a life beyond the cell phone, and we need to find a way to live that life.

If I were asked to sum up my experience of the past seven days in a sentence, I would say, “Been to hell and back, but I’ve come back even better.”

I have already admitted to missing my phone the past few days and I’ll even admit that I posted three pictures to my Instagram as soon as I had access to my phone. However, now I know that I can live without my phone, and that it’s just a habit that I never questioned. I’ve come out on the better end of this challenge because an angst has been rekindled within me — and it has everything to do with hating on the digital.

Take that selfie and post it; tweet what comes to your mind. It is only important that you aren’t doing this out of habit. You should be doing it out of choice.

Snowfall at SFU: Admin do their best to make everything the absolute worst

0

For the thirty-ninth time this year, competent meteorologists proved SFU incompetent. Amidst the blizzards of the past week, thousands of students were left stranded at school, on buses, and academically by the university’s inability to come to a quick and clear decision on, well, anything.

The SFSS elected a speaker to comment on the recent snow escapades, but he was found to be ineligible come press time.

When pressed for comment about the university’s actions, SFU president and vice-chancellor Andrew Petter replied, “Are you really surprised at this point? It’s not like we’ve been on top of things to date. Running things badly is SFU practice.”

The Peak
managed to acquire a copy of the institution’s snow day protocol. Some of the prime excerpts include:

“If there are enough 95B-Line buses at the base of the hill to block off Hastings entirely, inform students that travel may be difficult and safe alternate routes should be explored.”

“If Scenario 31b (bus service is halted) occurs, begin assessing the viability of class cancellations.”

“Only proceed with class in Scenario 31b if fewer than 10% of the class is present. If more than 10% of the class is present or already on their way, cancel five minutes into the session.”

“If all else fails, increase tuition.”


Third-year chemistry student Arya Kiddin was part of a task force assembled by SFU in December to try and find an efficient solution to excess snow. “We have tried for the last month or two to harness the saltiness of students in melting powdered frozen crystalline H2O compounds. . . but to date, all that can be squeezed from them is faith in the system. And money. Always money.”

“Be safe!” was Petter’s final irrelevant advice for students before he slithered back to his lair atop the mountain.

In better news for the school, the SFU football team had their game snowed out — their best result of the year. . . and eleventh no-show.



Claims of 160 SFU cafeteria workers being fired misleading

0
Michael Clarke, (centre) a Compass employee and union leader, presents the SFU administration the names of the students who have signed their support for the SFU food services staff.

While Simon Fraser University (SFU) is still determining who will be their next food supplier, an unfortunate hyperbolization is the latest twist in the plight of the employees worried about their jobs.  

Just past midnight on February 7, an email went out from graduate student Monica Petek to a portion of SFU students titled “URGENT: 160 SFU cafeteria workers have received termination notices.” This was sent to students who had signed a petition supporting the aforementioned workers, who have already protested twice over this issue.

This isn’t necessarily the whole truth, and is further complicated by Petek’s Facebook post claiming the employees were fired: “they won’t have their jobs after the end of April.” The post goes on to say that “the admin has opted to simply fire them instead,” which isn’t true at all.

As The Peak previously reported, there are tense feelings for SFU’s food services staff as SFU tenders offers for a new food supplier. Their contract with Chartwells expires soon. While SFU may choose to make a new contract with them, it’s a large enough purchase for the university that the Board needs to weigh in and due process (including fielding all best offers) must be followed.

However, the university said last week that it will be required that “the awarded Contractor [offer] employment to all existing dining services hourly staff in positions equivalent to their current jobs and at current or better wages and grade rates.” This is not a stance that has changed since then.

Following up with Martin Pochurko, the vice-president of finance and administration for SFU said this was just standard practice.

“I understand that Chartwells, as part of the contract with their union, are required to give their employees advance notice in the event they are not the successful proponent in the [request for proposal] process,” he said via email correspondence.

He then confirmed again that the contractor (Chartwells or whomever it may be) must offer employment to all existing dining services hourly staff, saying that there were no changes to their approach or perspective from last week.

Unfortunately, that didn’t stop over 100 shares of Petek’s post on Facebook, which advertises emergency meetings to support the cafeteria workers on February 10. In a regular contractual process between SFU and their next food supply company, it is the cafeteria workers themselves who are being affected most, and misinformation doesn’t necessarily help them.

Should they come to find though that come May 1st they do not have a job, only then will the claim they have been fired might have some merit to it.

UPDATED: Claims of 160 SFU cafeteria workers being fired misleading

0
Michael Clarke, (centre) a Compass employee and union leader, presents the SFU administration the names of the students who have signed their support for the SFU food services staff.

While Simon Fraser University (SFU) is still determining who will be their next food supplier, an unfortunate hyperbolization is the latest twist in the plight of the employees worried about their jobs.  

Just past midnight on February 7, an email went out from graduate student Monica Petek to a portion of SFU students titled “URGENT: 160 SFU cafeteria workers have received termination notices.” This was sent to students who had signed a petition supporting the aforementioned workers, who have already protested twice over this issue.

This isn’t necessarily the whole truth, and is further complicated by Petek’s Facebook post claiming the employees were fired: “they won’t have their jobs after the end of April.” The post goes on to say that “the admin has opted to simply fire them instead,” which isn’t true at all.

As The Peak previously reported, there are tense feelings for SFU’s food services staff as SFU tenders offers for a new food supplier. Their contract with Chartwells expires soon. While SFU may choose to make a new contract with them, it’s a large enough purchase for the university that the Board needs to weigh in and due process (including fielding all best offers) must be followed.

However, the university said last week that it will be required that “the awarded Contractor [offer] employment to all existing dining services hourly staff in positions equivalent to their current jobs and at current or better wages and grade rates.” This is not a stance that has changed since then.

Following up with Martin Pochurko, the vice-president of finance and administration for SFU said this was just standard practice.

“I understand that Chartwells, as part of the contract with their union, are required to give their employees advance notice in the event they are not the successful proponent in the [request for proposal] process,” he said via email correspondence.

He then confirmed again that the contractor (Chartwells or whomever it may be) must offer employment to all existing dining services hourly staff, saying that there were no changes to their approach or perspective from last week.

Unfortunately, that didn’t stop over 100 shares of Petek’s post on Facebook, which advertises emergency meetings to support the cafeteria workers on February 10. In a regular contractual process between SFU and their next food supply company, it is the cafeteria workers themselves who are being affected most, and misinformation doesn’t necessarily help them.

Should they come to find though that come May 1st they do not have a job, only then will the claim they have been fired might have some merit to it.

UPDATE (Thursday, February 16): Monica Petek has offered a response to the above article, which can be read below. The Peak has elected to publish it unedited and without comment.

“The suggestion that my Facebook post somehow instigated a ‘tug of war’ with the entire SFU administration, workers haplessly caught in the middle, is both highly insulting to the workers and creates an incomplete picture of the current situation.

Workers have been fighting for months for a formal guarantee from the administration that they will keep their current jobs, benefits, and union under a new food supplier. The administration has explicitly written to the union to say that it will not provide this guarantee. Furthermore, on January 31st, over 160 food service workers received notice of termination, effective April 30th. Previous changes in supplier have never been accompanied by such notices.

The administrators quoted in this piece say there will be jobs after April 30th, but they refuse to say if these will be the same jobs, if there will be jobs for all of the 160 workers, or whether these jobs will be accompanied with full existing benefits. In short, the workers cannot safely expect to keep their current jobs after April 30th.

Again, the workers have been fighting for a formal guarantee for months. If the administration is really willing to ensure that all 160 workers will keep their jobs, benefits, and union, why have they refused to put this in writing?

The last line of this piece, “[s]hould [the workers] come to find though that come May 1st they do not have a job, only then will the claim they have been fired might have some merit to it”, seriously understates the gravity and insecurity of the workers’ current position. Workers simply cannot afford to wait until May 1st. Student support is needed right now to let the administration know that we care about our food service workers and want all 160 of them to stay.”

Living wireless: confessions of a phone-oholic

0

This is the sixth post in a week-long web series that documents Preethi’s day-to-day experiences while forgoing a relationship with her cellphone. Check back daily for the next article.

I fell asleep the night before thinking about using my phone. So, it was only natural that I dreamt about it as well. I’m a lucid dreamer, so I remember my dreams as if they were movies. In this dream, I was in a maze trying to search for my phone. Ridiculous, but telling of just how desperately I want it at this point.

Day six fell on a Tuesday and day six was boring. A lecture and tutorial on a geography course. . . need I say more about how dull this Tuesday was? A two hour lecture on natural resources, I had no choice but to meet my professor’s gaze. Many students grabbed their phones during the lecture, checked messages, and then quickly put them away. The amount of times we all do this during class is amazing, and an observation I can credit to having mine taken away.

I have only one statement for my fellow SFU students: our attention spans are greatly limited and it’s entirely our fault. If you remember the popular comparison between the attention span of humans and goldfish, I want to deviate from such comparisons. A goldfish doesn’t have the means to increase its ability to concentrate; we do. If we credit ourselves for being the most progressive beings on Earth, please tell me why we have become slaves to the digital?

This is my real angst. And, if I bring about a new world order sometime in the future, I’m most definitely burning every cell phone I see. What is the origin of such declarations? Day six was not only boring, it was a pain in the butt. I was restless the entire day, while eating lunch and while sitting through my tutorial. I had to constantly tell myself, “One more day.”

My cell phone isn’t a drug, but it sure is addictive. Your body releases oxytocin at the sound of a “ping”; and if you ask me, that’s what we are addicted to. Not the phone itself, but the feeling of validation we get when it buzzes.

Day six and I finally can admit the difficulty of living without a phone. Seven days is too short a time-frame to get used to this routine, and I wonder if I should extend it to a month or even make it my lifestyle.

I have regularly used my cell phone for six years now, but I have accumulated zero skills from all the time I spend on my phone. It’s crazy to think how much time we invest into these devices, only to get little in return.

Day six is a day of agitation and ideas. I’m considering not only permanently limiting my cell phone exposure, but also leaving social media entirely. I don’t want to be someone who is this affected emotionally and mentally by the online world.

Day six I fell asleep thinking about my phone again. . . it has so much power that I don’t want to give it.

Living wireless: Day five has gone from not fun to just sad

0

This is the fifth post in a week-long web series that documents Preethi’s day-to-day experiences while forgoing a relationship with her cellphone. Check back daily for the next article.

In Hindi, five is called “paanch,” and I’m ready to paa(u)nch someone in the face this Monday.

I didn’t sleep very well the previous night and I wasn’t ready for the week to start. Not using my phone is turning out to be more problematic, as this week I’m organizing some club events. Catching hold of people through email has been rather difficult and, at this point, I started to reconsider the pros of being on social media and began to turn skeptical on my “no phone” propaganda.

As my day rolled out, I didn’t have time to trace whether I missed my phone or not. When my work shift started, I heard the familiar sound of my phone and I immediately reached for my pockets; but it wasn’t my phone, it was my colleague’s. I’m not surprised by this — I simply wanted what I couldn’t have. After my shift finished, I rushed home because this week’s work wasn’t going to do itself.

The process and feeling behind my seven-day challenge repeats itself. I made food that I couldn’t capture and share, and realized how profusely I indulge in sharing the food I make. I almost heard myself say, “It looks so pretty and no one can see it!” If my great grandmother was alive, she’d probably give me the biggest whack on my head. When did we start doing things for ourselves as well as the thousand and one friends we have on social media? She wouldn’t like how I live my life online, so why do I allow myself all these bad habits?

These urges speak a lot to my helplessness. There have been many times in the past when I would wake up and sit on my phone for hours. Even though I knew that I had a lot of things to attend to, I would scroll myself into an abyss of digital garbage as I felt lethargic at my best. As soon as I would realize that I had used my phone for an hour, I would force myself to put it down — only to pick it up again in 10 minutes.

It, in fact, is a roach. We could live without it, but no matter what we do, it always creeps back into our lives. As soon as I finished cooking, I headed to the library and worked until 2 a.m. As I walked back home, I tried to evaluate what makes us want to look at our screens every 15 minutes or so. I think it’s the unrestrained access to our phones that makes us pick them up and mindlessly scroll through posts.

In a way, it isn’t a big deal that we want to share pictures of our food or the coffee that we’re overdosing on. It is a big deal when we share these on social media, without necessarily screening ourselves. Asking the question, “Why am I sharing this with people?” is always a great place to start.

Given that these were my reflections, I cannot say that I didn’t want my phone back. I was increasingly getting bored without entertaining visuals and engaging videos that I usually view on Facebook or Instagram. I’ve been expecting a full meltdown, and to me that was going to be the ‘storm’ that marked the end of this challenge. But I’m starting to realize the real storm is being stuck in the endless tug-of-war that is forgoing my cellphone and fitting in with the status quo.

SFU hockey win 3–1 over Selkirk College

0
SFU is now 15-3-2 on the season, good enough for first place in the BCIHL.

A third game in as many nights is a daunting task, but that’s what SFU faced when they played Selkirk College on Saturday night. Winning the previous two games against Trinity Western and Eastern Washington, a win would see the Clan go for perfect in this difficult stretch, and extend their lead on top of the BC Intercollegiate Hockey League (BCIHL) to nine points. With another great performance from Lyndon Stanwood and the first BCIHL goal from Tim Chow, SFU was able to defeat Selkirk 3–1.

“I thought it was a great game,” said head coach Mark Coletta afterwards. “The second period we didn’t play that well, and I think it’s tough to play three games in three nights. You’re going to have a little bit of a sleepy period, but that was it.

“But in the third, the way the guys battled and played, it was tremendous.”

The first period saw the first career BCIHL goal for Tim Chow. The first-year player gave SFU a 1–0 lead with about three minutes to go in the opening frame. The walk-on was rewarded for his hard work throughout the season thus far.

“I got a really nice pass from Darnel [St. Pierre],” said Chow, explaining his goal. “I had some room, probably should have shot it, turned around. I was really looking for a pass the whole time, and there was four of their guys in front of the net. I just decided to throw it there and luckily it went in.”

The second featured no scoring from either team, but probably should have. Off a two-on-one break, Selkirk appeared to score. Not so, said the referee, and the goal was waved off.

Once the third got started, Selkirk finally got their tying goal, as Jack Mills put one home on the powerplay. However, a few minutes later, Jesse Mysiorek scored what ended up being the game-winner off a scramble in front. Mike Sandor scored the insurance goal off a strangle deflection in front.

Lyndon Stanwood got the start in goal, and was once again impressive, to say the least. He let in one goal on 20 shots, and improved to a perfect 9–0 on the year. It’s been a remarkable turnaround this year for Stanwood, who last season had only four wins and a save percentage of .870.

“I think it’s that competition side of him,” said Coletta on what has changed for Stanwood this season. “He’s a warrior out there, he battles. He plays with a chip on his shoulder. He’s a smaller goalie, he knows that he has to make himself look big; he knows that he has to compete. It’s fun to watch. Him and [Jordan] Liem are two really good goalies, so it’s fun to see the contrasting styles.”

SFU is now 15–3–2 on the year and have won four-straight.

Next Game: SFU takes on the University of Victoria (UVic) on Friday in Victoria, before they play Eastern Washington at Bill Copeland on Saturday. The Clan are 4–0–1 against UVic and 5–0 against Eastern Washington, scoring 33 goals and only conceding six against the Eagles.