Home Blog Page 70

Stop normalizing racism towards South Asians

0
this picture is of a large group of students protesting in the street. A young man in the foreground holds the Indian flag up in front of him.
PHOTO: Ekabhishek / Wikimedia Commons

By: Yasmin Hassan, Staff Writer

Content warning: descriptions of anti-South Asian rhetoric.

Whether it’s “taking our jobs,” “ruining the economy,” or not “assimilating” to western norms, immigrants are increasingly being used as an excuse for our “crumbling” society. This is compounded by the normalization of racism towards South Asians. Such scapegoating and racist rhetoric has risen and continues to solidify itself as an abhorrent norm in day-to-day life. Though it’s nothing new, as seen even in 1914 with the Komagata Maru incident when hundreds of Indian immigrants were turned away from Vancouver’s ports — history has a cruel way of repeating itself. 

Before Canada’s first multiculturalism policy was implemented in 1971, there were multiple restrictive immigration policies that ran along racial and ethnic bases. However, there is something to be said about how our current system, supposedly grounded in merit, becomes more explicitly racist as immigration policies tighten. An article studying Canada’s implementation of “merit-based” immigration policy shows that individual assessments of so-called merit are not free of racial bias. On the contrary, the conceptualization of merit “emerged as a way of managing race at the intersection of class and status.” The narrative that there can begood” versus “bad” immigrants drives a dangerous divide, one that enables discriminatory policies and fosters a hostile environment for many seeking the same opportunities as us.

South Asian folks in recent years have been blamed for increased gang violence and housing affordability. The fact that these claims are only gaining popularity goes to show the racism that lies behind the thinly-veiled “kindness and acceptance” of Canadians. The normalization of racism towards South Asians is not just an online phenomenon, though online spaces are certainly where it thrives; you might have seen the recent trend of people from western countries taking videos of street food in low-income Indian neighbourhoods. These videos emphasize the vendors’ lack of sanitation as an excuse to spew racist and derogatory claims about Indian food and individuals being “dirty.” Nevermind the fact that these videos occur in communities with limited resources and access to proper sanitation due to socioeconomic inequalities, and they are being exploited for views. In his video essay on the topic, YouTuber Saji Sharma explains, “These videos are dog whistles for the normalized Indian racism to come seeping out of the cracks. And most of the time, people don’t even need an excuse to be racist.” He cited how his comment sections are full of slurs and racism.

Such prejudices also show up in everyday life and are highly prevalent in our own communities. For example, despite the tens of development projects taking place in the city centre, places like Surrey, which have a significant South Asian population, are often colloquially deemed “ghetto.” Ghettoization is the process of creating segregated neighborhoods for marginalized groups, often due to political, economic, or social pressure. Calling Surrey or otherwise “ghetto” carries intentionally harmful connotations for those who live there, especially when it comes to racial minorities. The association with poverty and crime is already one we are being spoon-fed, and this rhetoric deserves questioning. This is especially true as racist extremists start to build a following and start spewing hatred toward Indians like “they have to go back.”

South Asian countries have been targeted as a source of cheap labour, especially through the international student program. Rather than being given the resources to thrive, these folks often only move here with no choice but to work low-wage jobs while dealing with inflated tuition rates and unaffordable housing, leaving many stuck in a cycle of poverty. This current stage of capitalism has created a version of hyper individualism that makes everyone think that their success is solely dependent on how hard they work. A person’s job then contributes to their status, and low-wage jobs are seen as jobs done by the lesser, no matter how essential

Due to the prevalence of western norms, assimilation is subtly, and sometimes overtly, expected from non-European immigrants. The model minority myth applied to East Asians characterizes them as the “ideal,” successful citizen, yet it simultaneously holds other minority groups to the standard of white supremacy. The unspoken message is clear — if you want to succeed in this society, your success is measured by western ideals and against your neighbours’. This not only divides immigrant communities but reinforces a racial hierarchy where South Asians and their vibrant cultures are “othered,” as less deserving of integration and acceptance. 

The racism faced by South Asians isn’t limited to loud outbursts or isolated incidents. It’s woven into the fabric of daily life, quietly perpetuated by policy subtleties, in the way stereotypes are passed off as truth, and in the way immigrant lives are exploited. To move forward as a country, we must confront these underlying biases, hold ourselves accountable for our complicity, and recognize that the struggle against racism is not just a matter of policy, but also changing the way we see and treat each other in the spaces we share.

SFU confirms discontinuation of its football program

0
This is a photo of an SFU football player holding his helmet to the side of his body, with the photo facing from the back.
PHOTO: Courtesy of @sfu_athletics / Instagram

By: Phone Min Thant, Staff Writer

On January 15, SFU officially confirmed the discontinuation of its football program in the 2025 Athletics and Recreation Strategy. This decision followed the discontinuation of the program in 2023. 

When SFU initially announced the discontinuation of SFU football, the wider university community rallied behind the program and its players. The SFU Football Alumni Society proceeded with legal action and petitions, but their injunction was denied because it “failed to satisfy the legal requirements and did not convince the court that an injunction is appropriate.” An injunction “usually takes the form of an order preventing or restraining a person from performing an act.” Until the recent decision, there was still hope that the program would return as SFU appointed a third-party special advisor “to explore options for the future of football at SFU.”  

In an SFU News release, SFU said that while they face an “uncertain financial climate,” this did not “impact the university’s decision on football.” They added that SFU needs “stronger financial prudence across all aspects of the university, including Athletics and Recreation.” They also stated that the discontinuation came after “an extensive report by an independent special advisor reinforced that SFU had no place to play in the National Collegiate Athletics Association.” NCAA Division II, which SFU football was a part of, is the “second highest level of collegiate sports in the US.” SFU also stated that competing in USports “would be costly with the outcome not guaranteed.” USports is “the leader of university sports in Canada” that gives “student-athletes and national championships” visibility. 

The Peak spoke with Emmanuel Adegboyega, Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) president and former player on the football team. Adegboyega expressed that the official discontinuation “doesn’t come too much of a surprise” compared to the announcement in 2023, but is still “a clarification of where the university stands on the importance of sports to their students.

“People are very concerned about the approach the university took to making this decision. They felt like the university didn’t involve them, didn’t consult, didn’t meet with them,” he said. “The thousands of people that signed those letters a couple of years ago asking the university to bring back the program shows that this program had support from people at SFU and beyond.”

“If the university is able to do this to the largest team that they run [ . . . ] how much easier would [it be for] a smaller team to be taken off the university’s priority?” — Emmanuel Adegboyega, SFSS president

When asked about SFU’s finances, Adegboyega said that “short-term-wise, the university was trying to be prudent” and “not invest in something that costs millions of dollars annually.” Still, he expressed that SFU football brought “culture, community to students, a sense of belonging,” and sponsored opportunities to play on the team. He said these elements are “beyond the expenses that you’ll see on paper.” 

The SFSS president said the impact of athletics is not limited to student athletes, and that the once-packed stadiums at SFU’s football games are a testament to this. He said that “in the grand scheme of things, it was not a prudent decision” to discontinue this part of SFU.

Adegboyega added that the end of the football program has had a ripple effect of uncertainty between teams regarding the future of SFU Athletics and Recreation: “If the university is able to do this to the largest team that they run [ . . . ] how much easier would [it be for] a smaller team to be taken off the university’s priority?”

In an interview with CBC News, SFU’s provost and vice-president Dilson Rassier said, “The mission of university is education. It’s not to develop professional athletes in any sport.” Adegboyega said this view on the university experience sees education “as something that happens within the confines of a classroom.

“Education as we know it is not what it used to be,” he said. “A student must be viewed in the most holistic way possible,” in which mental and physical well-being are considered, “and that’s what sports do.”

Student alleges scam recruitment at SFU

0
This is a photo of several students in an SFU classroom working at their desks in a U shape. The featured photo does not relate to the incident described in the article.
PHOTO: Gudrun Wai-Gunnarsson / The Peak

By: Mason Mattu, News Writer

Editor’s note: The featured photo does not feature the people or locations involved in the incident described in this article. This photo was set up by the photographer without any intention of resembling the incident.

On January 6, a representative from the company Scholars Edge Painting asked an SFU economics professor to deliver a speech during lecture. Scholars Edge is a “business development program” that allows “students to experience running their own [painting] business” during the summer. The business has no affiliation with SFU or official campus presence. Following a presentation to the class about Scholars Edge, the representative allegedly grew angry and snatched a set of recruitment papers out of the professor’s hands.

Initially, information about the incident was posted in a now-deleted Reddit post on r/simonfraser that featured photos of the representative — Galen Malthouse, a district manager at Scholars Edge. Malthouse spoke to The Peak in an interview. He is not a student at SFU.

He told The Peak he didn’t have permission from SFU administration to advertise Scholars Edge on campus, but had permission to present from the SFU professor. Malthouse stated that his company has had some recruitment initiatives at SFU before. In other instances, he explained he gained permission from other university administrators to present in front of classes, but did not think it was necessary to ask SFU administration as he got the classroom professor’s approval. 

In a statement to The Peak, SFU said “commercial activities and advertising on SFU campuses fall under policy AD 1.06,” which states, “advertising and other commercial activities are not permitted in classrooms, laboratories, or any other space specifically devoted to academic purposes.” 

The Peak spoke to Josh, an eyewitness who saw the incident in class. The Peak verified Josh was enrolled in the same economics course where the incident took place. Josh’s name has been changed to protect his identity. According to Josh, Malthouse entered the economics lecture before class started and spoke to the professor. He then presented a job opportunity with his company where “top candidates” could apply and “make $30,000.” Malthouse passed around sign-up sheets and left the lecture hall in Shrum Science Centre Chemistry afterward. According to Josh, the sign-up sheets did not mention the company’s name.

“During the class, I searched up Scholars Edge. And then I saw all these reviews saying it was a scam, and a lot of people lost money,” said Josh. He mentioned he saw posts on Reddit warning students of first-day scams and illegitimate job opportunities on campus. 

On r/UCalgary, one Reddit user who claims to have experience working for the company said it puts student painters in unsafe working conditions. Other allegations against the company from anonymous users who claim to be former employees include district managers being “shady with money” and wages being paid in cash. The Peak could not independently verify this information.

Malthouse, who has been part of Scholars Edge for seven years, said Scholars Edge is not a scam. He also stated that Scholars Edge is a co-op work-study option at UVic. Two UVic students claim to be doing a co-op at Scholars Edge, according to the Scholar’s Edge website. The Peak tried to access the UVic co-op portal but could not independently verify this information. “At no point is there a situation where people lose money by doing Scholars Edge,” he said. “Students don’t pay anything upfront to do Scholars Edge.” Malthouse said Scholars Edge makes investments in their student painters. This includes giving them business licenses, marketing materials, and information on how to run their business. He stated that students make money through “a profit margin off of their business,” in which the company takes royalty

“During the class, I searched up Scholars Edge. And then I saw all these reviews saying it was a scam, and a lot of people lost money.” — Josh, SFU student, eyewitness

The Scholars Edge website states the company “does not guarantee profits.” 

Josh said he let the professor know what he found online, and the professor gathered the sign-up sheets from students. When Malthouse re-entered the lecture hall at the end of class, the professor declined his request to give back the signed papers. Malthouse then allegedly “snatched” the papers from their hands. 

“His face was shaking,”  said Josh, referring to Malthouse. “He was fuming.”

Malthouse denies snatching the papers or raising his voice. He stated the professor was “very rude” to him. “If [the professor was] going to hang onto these papers, they were doing those students a massive disservice,” said Malthouse. “If [the students] hadn’t gotten that call, then they never would have known what this opportunity was.” Malthouse calls students who sign up to facilitate an information session. 

The Peak reached out to the economics professor for more information, but did not receive a response by the publication deadline. SFU told The Peak they were “aware of an incident where a recruiter is alleged to have grabbed a stack of recruitment papers from a professor’s hand” and that Campus Public Safety (CPS) confirmed “they were notified after the incident.” SFU also stated that “a supervisor with CPS met with the faculty member to document a formal report and offer available supports to them.”

Reddit users on r/simonfraser said Malthouse tried to address their class as well. Malthouse confirmed he had visited other business classes on January 6. Josh also said he’s seen QR codes leading to “multi-level marketing scams” on the ground at SFU. While a “multi-level marketing plan is a legal business model for selling goods and services,” some of these businesses “are illegal pyramid schemes.” A pyramid scheme generates profit by “recruiting an ever-increasing number of  ‘investors’” and “providing profits to the earlier investors.” Incidents involving recruiting for alleged scams and multi-level marketing schemes have been seen in the past. Two years ago, SFU students issued complaints about the recruitment practices of Scholars Edge and a similar company, Student Works Painting. Three years ago, a Reddit user warned of a multi-level marketing scheme disguised as a “financial literacy campaign.” Similar instances have also occurred at UBC and UVic

In an email reporting the incident to Galib Bhayani, SFU chief safety and risk officer, Josh made a series of requests to prevent these incidents from taking place in the future. This includes alerting “professors across all faculties to deny access to unauthorized individuals attempting to make announcements during lectures” and investigating “this incident further to ensure appropriate actions are taken against the individual involved to prevent similar occurrences.”

The Peak reached out to Scholar’s Edge Painting for comment. The company requested more time to allow the investigation of the incident to be completed and include it in the article. The Peak was unable to extend the deadline due to our publication deadline but may follow up about the investigation in a future article.

To contact CPS in an urgent situation, you can call 778-782-4500. For a Safe Walk, call CPS at 778-782-7991.

Stix the burnt out candle issue #2

0
COMIC: Yildiz Subuk / The Peak

Book Nook: Xiran Jay Zhao’s Iron Widow series

0
An East-Asian woman shown twice in two different costumes: to the left is a golden set of battle armour and a royal headdress, while the right is a burgundy dress with silver web-like designs near the torso. In the background are golden dragon-like scales.
ILLUSTRATION: Winnie Shen / The Peak

By: Phone Min Thant, Staff Writer

Content warning: brief mentions of murder and war. 

Those familiar with Chinese history are probably no stranger to Empress Wu Zetian, the only legitimate empress of The Middle Kingdom. But, did you know there is a connection between Zetian and SFU? This connection is none other than Xiran Jay Zhao (the name may be familiar for those who frequent BookTok), an SFU health sciences alum whose fictionalized sci-fi duology reimagines Zetian. Their books, Iron Widow and Heavenly Tyrant, have both achieved number one spots on the New York Times bestsellers lists.

To put into perspective why the books are so popular, imagine medieval China and Gundam robots in the same universe, at the same time — exciting already, right? Set against the backdrop of a war against aliens in the fictional nation of Huaxia, Zetian is a pilot serving in Huaxia’s military-run patriarchy which takes pride in pairing boys and girls in piloting mechs together. The downside? The boys are treated as military heroes and the girls as concubines of their co-pilots.

Iron Widow follows Zetian’s quest for vengeance for her younger sister, who has been murdered by her co-pilot. What comes afterward is a tale of retribution filled with assassinations, betrayals, love triangles, violence, and a whole lot of moral greyness.

I’m an avid reader of fictional retellings of history, but Iron Widow stands out for a few reasons. Firstly, there is no lengthy dwelling on any one theme. If the plot orients too much towards love, an action-packed battle sequence jumps in. Too much battlefield violence? You will be put on the edge of a different type of seat through the many instances of political intrigue.

“From corrupt governments with hidden agendas to gods, psychic powers, and robot battles, Zhao expertly constructs the environment that Zetian has found herself in, explaining controversial decisions she takes as the story progresses.”

Next, the world building is spectacular. From corrupt governments with hidden agendas to gods, psychic powers, and robot battles, Zhao expertly constructs the environment that Zetian has found herself in, explaining controversial decisions she takes as the story progresses. Since the protagonist herself is morally questionable throughout the story, the rich world-building helped me understand some of the decisions she made and allowed me to sympathize with her. It’s  always tiring trying to find out whether your favourite morally-questionable hero has a spontaneous villain arc, right? Apart from how the characters are written, I think this is due to Zhao’s ability to maintain a good balance between historical inspiration, mythology, and the plotline. There’s no overwhelming reliance on a single issue, which I think is a refreshing way to handle historical fiction.

Lastly, Iron Widow handles the overarching issue of gender equality so well. It shows that feminism isn’t only about righteousness and a desire for change. Zetian possesses those traits for sure, but she is also driven by her personal ambitions. It shows that the pursuit of equality may sometimes be difficult and contested. Zetian manipulates and betrays other pilots, kills her conservative family, and engages in acts like torture.

Heavenly Tyrant is Iron Widow’s sequel, released in December 2024. Continuing the storyline after suffering a defeat, Zetian is now in control of Huaxia but finds herself sharing power with a resurrected Emperor-General. Heavenly Tyrant takes Zetian to the uncomfortable position where she can truly exercise power and authority and decide on changes that she wanted to bring about in book one. 

While less intense than Iron Widow, the plotline still has twists and turns, especially as Zetian navigated her new-found (even forced) romance with the Emperor-General and her fight to give women more power in Huaxian society. What I liked about Heavenly Tyrant is its ability to show readers the politics of a revolution — how an idealistic protagonist finds herself making uneasy alliances to achieve her ultimate goals.

The second book, however, may feel a bit slower in some places to readers used to the rapidity of Iron Widow. There are certain parts of the book which focus on exploring key themes such as capitalism and communism. While it is important to understand the ideological concepts underlying the main theme of the book, some dialogue feels particularly simplified, which takes the readers away from the main plotline in my opinion.

I found Heavenly Tyrant extremely captivating at the end, especially with Zhao’s explicit focus on political intrigue and Zetian’s utilization of sex as a weapon to achieve her larger aims. While readers of Iron Widow may find the change in pace a bit divergent from book one, Heavenly Tyrant is still an exciting, interesting read nonetheless. 

Iron Widow and Heavenly Tyrant are both available to borrow from the Vancouver Public Library.

It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s Joy Johnson!

0
Illustration of SFU president Joy Johnson wearing a red shirt and pink blazer in front of a grey calendar. Activities listed on the calendar include running a marathon, being SFU president, recording a podcast, filming for television, and creating special effects.
ILLUSTRATION: Angela Shen / The Peak

By: Yasmin Hassan, Staff Writer

In a revelation that left the SFU community astonished and amused, it appears our esteemed president and vice-chancellor, Dr. Joy Johnson, is not just an accomplished academic but also a master of multiple personas. After a thorough investigation (a Google search), The Peak has uncovered a series of alter egos that Johnson has been meticulously maintaining in the shadows — or so we’d like to believe.

By day, she leads SFU with vision and dedication. By night, she transforms into a motivational podcaster and wellness coach. Under the moniker “Joyful Fit Life,” she inspires individuals to live better lives with insights on balance, fitness, and self-care. Who knew she could go from drafting academic policies and letting go of hundreds of staff to recording life-changing podcast episodes? 

Boeing Johnson

Oh, yeah, did I mention that Johnson also works on airplanes? Yup! She’s the executive staff analyst for Boeing Commercial Airplanes, When she’s not casting background actors to look engaged on campus, she’s crunching numbers to ensure those 767s don’t fall out of the sky. Beyond catering to the university’s benefactors, she always ensures her private jet is fueled up (we don’t have any evidence that she owns one, she just has that vibe). After all, increasing parking allowances for executives doesn’t end at ground level. How else do you think a person this busy is going to get up the mountain?

Nollywood Johnson

As if academics and engineering weren’t enough, Johnson seems to have found time to break into Nollywood. Yes, there’s a Joy Johnson starring in Nigerian cinema classics like The Thing About Men and Vid Chron Ultra, bringing drama and intrigue to the big screen (like she doesn’t already do that at SFU). It’s unclear how she manages to juggle university presidency while attending red-carpet premieres in a different country (the private jet, I’m TELLING you), but we’re sure it involves impeccable time management.

Marathon Johnson

Did you know that seeing frustrated students approach you at a concerning speed makes you run faster? Johnson has mastered this trick, so scientists hate her! This impromptu training method allows her to run the university and record-setting marathons. This Joy Johnson, a legend in her own right, holds the title as the oldest woman finisher of the New York City Marathon, completing the race an astounding 25 times. While the now moneyless students waving their fists at her may stop after a couple of minutes chasing her, Johnson probably has the endurance to keep running away from our problems.

While it’s highly improbable (or is it?) that Johnson is all these people at once, it’s comforting to imagine her as a young adult like us, taking any odd jobs she can to earn some cash. It is a bit annoying seeing her excel in every conceivable field but, maybe the lesson here is that wherever there’s a Joy Johnson, there’s . . . more Joy Johnsons. And if you ever meet another Joy Johnson, don’t be surprised if she asks you to keep her double life a secret. Oh look! We just spotted Special Effects Johnson in the distance! 

The race that defined 12 years: a peek into the Chinese zodiac

0
An illustration depicting an ox, rat, tiger, rabbit, and dragon atop a cliff, with a snake and a horse following depicting the myth of the great race of the Chinese Zodiac
ILLUSTRATION: Yan Ting Leung / The Peak

By: Izzy Cheung, Arts & Culture and Sports Editor

My family has always celebrated the New Year with confetti and candy at the turn of midnight. At the end of January or the start of February, we go to my grandma’s to celebrate Lunar New Year. Even so, I’ve never followed the Chinese Lunisolar calendar — it wasn’t the main calendar to follow in Canada (where I was born), so it never ranked high on my list of priorities. However, as I’ve grown older, I’ve realized that learning more about this calendar means preserving my culture’s history despite moving from its point of origin, which is something I’ve set my sights on doing.   

My grandma has two birthdays. Her first birthday is the actual day that she was born, way back when she lived in the busy city of Macau. This is the birthday we celebrate with her to this day. Her second birthday didn’t come until she moved to Canada. Due to Canada’s use of the Gregorian calendar, she had to convert her Lunisolar birthday to align with the new calendar. As a kid, I never understood why this was the case. Why did she follow a different calendar, and how did this calendar come to be? 

The Chinese Lunisolar calendar uses both the orbits of the moon around Earth, and the Earth around the sun, to record time. Because of the complexities behind this, this calendar has a 13th month in it every couple of years. If there are occasionally 13 months, though, then how are the years decided? 

I first learned about the great race in a kindergarten classroom. When I had more questions, I went to my family. Even now, I’ve had to consult some online sources to polish off some details. What I can garner about this story is that no two are the same — but all of them follow the same idea.  

Myths state that twelve animals were called together to partake in a race. The emperor, who orchestrated the competition, told the animals their placement in the race would dictate the order of their zodiac. Each year that passed would be given to a particular animal, hence why Chinese New Year celebrations will typically include depictions of that animal. 

Myths state that twelve animals were called together to partake in a race. The emperor, who orchestrated the competition, told the animals their placement in the race would dictate the order of their zodiac.

The way the story was told to me was that the rat was teased for being too small. The other animals thought, because the rat was smaller than them, it would be the slowest of the creatures. However, towards the end of the race, the animals had to cross a deep river, and many couldn’t traverse it on their own. The rat, who had grown friendly with the ox during the race, asked if they could hop on the ox’s back as they crossed the river. The ox agreed, and the two crossed the river together. When they reached the other side, the rat crossed the finish line first, with the ox coming in second. 

The tiger came in third place, having bravely fought through the river to finish the race. In fourth was the rabbit, who had a little help crossing by jumping onto rocks and floating logs. The dragon, who could have flown over and easily came in first, finished in fifth. They sensed that others needed help and decided to take care of them instead. While retellings of this story differ, they all end with the same order. The snake came in sixth, the horse in seventh, the goat in eighth, the monkey in ninth, the rooster in tenth, and the dog and pig in 11th and 12th respectively. 

Learning about the great race has been a long process for me. It started when I was young, and has grown throughout the years. I view it similarly to how I’ve immersed myself in my culture. Things were introduced to me as a child, but I hadn’t opened my mind to exploring them until now. I can’t say the Chinese Lunisolar calendar is currently my main source for time — but as Lunar New Year approaches, I’m excited to see what the year of the snake has in store. 

Keep reading to see which zodiac animal is yours! 

Note: Because Chinese New Year tends to start anywhere from mid-January to early February, this may mean that a person born in January of a particular year is actually part of the zodiac from the previous year. For example, someone born in January 1996 would have been born during the year of the pig instead of the rat. 

Rat1972, 1984, 1996, 2008, 2020, 2032

The rat is known for its ability to think quickly and effectively, which helped it secure first place in the race. Other attributes include being “smart, versatile, and good at saving money.” Every new cycle of the zodiac animals starts with the rat, meaning that 2032 will be the next time the calendar refreshes itself. 

Ox1973, 1985, 1997, 2009, 2021, and 2033

Those born during the year of the ox are seen as having “diligence, perseverance, honesty,” and more. You’re a hard worker with a loyal heart. In the context of Chinese New Year celebrations, the ox symbolizes “agricultural abundance” and “prosperity.”  

Tiger1974, 1986, 1998, 2010, 2022, and 2034

Tigers carry great significance in Chinese culture. Highly regarded as “the king of all beasts in China,” this zodiac animal is known for being cool as a cucumber with unparalleled confidence. Go get ‘em, tiger!  

Rabbit1975, 1987, 1999, 2011, 2023, and 2035

Universally speaking, rabbits are regarded as cute, cuddly animals, though the Chinese zodiac views them a little differently. Because of their nature, the characteristics most associated with this zodiac are “longevity, peace, and prosperity.” 

Dragon1976, 1988, 2000, 2012, 2024, and 2036

While the tiger is a big part of Chinese culture, the dragon may be considered an even bigger factor. Dragons are thought of as “majestic and powerful,” in part due to their intimidating personage. 

Snake1965, 1977, 1989, 2001, 2013, 2025, and 2037

2025 is the year of the snake. Similar to the rat, this zodiac animal is renowned for its intelligence, as well as its “charm, elegance, and transformation.” The year of the snake begins on January 29.   

Horse1966, 1978, 1990, 2002, 2014, and 2026

If you’re born during the year of the horse, the horoscopes typically say that you are “hardworking, warm-hearted, and independent.” As well, it’s said that the horse has an energetic and extroverted spirit. 

Goat/ram/sheep1967, 1979, 1991, 2003, 2015, and 2027

In Chinese culture, the goat (also known as the ram or sheep) is described as being very “nurturing” yet determined. A docile character, the goat is more of a caretaker compared to some of the other animals’ individual and hard-willed personalities. 

Monkey1968, 1980, 1992, 2004, 2016, and 2028

Like the rat and the snake, the monkey is thought of as a jokester who uses their penchant for entertainment to exhibit its fast thinking and wit. Monkeys are highly intelligent animals that “can be great companions.” 

Rooster1969, 1981, 1993, 2005, 2017, and 2029

The rooster is a confident animal that has a very high sense of self-worth. A blunt animal, it prides itself in working for what it’s owed and keeping things honest. With its extroverted personality, it can command a room like no one else. 

Dog1970, 1982, 1994, 2006, 2018, and 2030

Those born in the year of the dog are loyal to the highest degree. These animals aren’t loyal like the nurturing goat — instead, they regard their loved ones like partners. They won’t coddle you, but they will do everything in their power to ensure your happiness. 

Pig1971, 1983, 1995, 2007, 2019, and 2031

The final animal of the Chinese zodiac is the pig. As the last animal to finish the race, the pig is regarded as a symbol of “wealth, felicity, honesty, and practicality.” Some even claim that piggy banks were inspired by the zodiac animal’s characteristics, as people believe that the animal will “bring good luck monetarily.”

What Grinds Our Gears: Bean sprouts

0
bean sprouts
PHOTO: kikisora / Adobe Stock

By: Izzy Cheung, Arts & Culture and Sports Editor

I always get odd looks sent my way whenever I choose to pass on the bean sprouts at any pho restaurant. The people I go most often with already know the story, but to newcomers, the question is always the same. 

“Why don’t you eat bean sprouts with your pho?” 

It’s a complicated answer. One time when I was a kid, I went out for pho with my family. Everything seemed normal — I got my usual kids meal, my parents asked the staff if they could cook our platter of bean sprouts, and we drank our waters while indulging in our meals. I was young, clueless, and unaware that a single bean sprout had wormed its way into my spoon. As I scooped the noodles into my mouth, something slashed at the back of my throat. 

That dastardly bean sprout! 

I coughed wildly, dropping my spoon in shock as tears sprang to my eyes. How could this bean sprout do such a thing? How could I have been so naïve as to trust this plant? 

My anger towards bean sprouts has remained fiery ever since that night. Whenever I go for ramen, I ask for no bean sprouts out of fear that they’ll come to hurt me again. If they come with my stir fry, I’ll pick them out with a simmering sneer. Never again will I allow these creatures to hurt me like how they once did. Besides, they don’t even taste that great. Why take the risk? 

Canada falls to Czechia in WJC quarterfinals again

0
three players standing on podium: at the top is a boy in a blue jersey with “USA” written in red, to the left of him is a player in blue who shakes his hand, and to the right of him is a player in red and white with a bronze medal on.
ILLUSTRATION: Winnie Shen / The Peak

By: Kaja Antic, Sports Writer

For the second year in a row, team Canada fell in the International Ice Hockey Federation World Junior Championship quarterfinals to Czechia. Though Canada holds the record for most tournament titles with 20, the team has seen little success since last winning the tournament in 2023.

Despite their first win against Finland 4–0, Canada struggled with scoring throughout the group stage. The team held a 1–0 lead against Latvia until the final seven minutes, when Latvia scored on the power play to tie the game late. Canada scored 64 seconds later on their own power play, and all seemed well for the host team before Latvia made it 2–2 with under three minutes to go in the third period. Overtime solved nothing, and outstanding performances from goalies Jack Ivankovic and Linards Feldbergs took the shootout to eight rounds before Eriks Mateiko scored to win the game for Latvia. This was a team that Canada had beaten 10–0 in 2024. In 2025, however, Latvia earned their first win over the host country, who showed glaring issues with the ineffectiveness of their offensive, and their passiveness on defence.

Goaltending was the only constant throughout the tournament. Canadian goalie Carter George shut out Germany in Canada’s third preliminary game — the host team winning 3–0 against a team that narrowly missed relegation the previous year.

Canada dropped their final group stage game to the defending champions, the US. The Americans took the lead early in the game, before Carolina Hurricanes prospect Bradly Nadeau scored on the power play, under two minutes into the third period. The hopes for a Canadian win were quickly dashed however, as the US team scored three unanswered goals — two power plays and one empty net — to take the 4–1 win. 

“A team that Canada had beaten 10–0 in 2024 earned their first win over Canada, while the host country showed the glaring issues with the ineffectiveness of their offensive, and their passiveness on defence.”

Heading into the quarterfinals, Canada looked to get revenge on their Czech opponents after their shock elimination the previous year. Czechia took a commanding 3–1 lead in the first period alone, though Canada powered back to tie it, scoring in the second and adding the equalizer in the final five minutes. The dream of a Canadian comeback was dashed, however, when Nashville Predators prospect Andrew Gibson took a kneeing penalty with under 3 minutes to go. Canada tried to hold off the Czech attack, though with 17 seconds remaining on the penalty to Gibson and 40 seconds remaining in the game overall, Adam Jecho scored to make it 4–3 Czechia, virtually eliminating Canada from the tournament.

With the team’s tournament now over, many looked to the glaring issues that caused the repeated premature elimination. Canada only scored 13 goals in the group stage, compared to 23 in 2024 and 42 in 2023, showing a dramatic drop in offensive performance across the board. 

Another main issue was lack of discipline. The tournament uses IIHF rules, which are seen as more “strict” when compared to NHL rules, and Canada’s squad had not adjusted their play accordingly — unlike the rest of the teams they were playing against. Canada had incurred 113 penalty minutes over just the five games they played, 22 over Czechia in second-most with 91. In the quarterfinal alone, Canada had earned 55 penalty minutes — almost an entire regulation game — over Czechia only getting 10. 

Though his team had 8.7 penalty minutes for every goal they scored, Canadian head coach Dave Cameron claimed he had “no regrets” after Canada’s disappointing finish. Czechia went on to win the bronze medal after a record-breaking 14-round shootout against Sweden, and the Americans won gold in overtime against Finland — earning their first ever back-to-back World Junior Championships. 

With the 2026 tournament headed south of the border to Minnesota, the Americans will look to extend their history-making run, while Canada looks to pick up the pieces of repeated disappointing performances from a nation used to dominating this tournament, and the sport overall.

At SFU, we care

0
Woman holding a spray bottle of cleaning solution and a duster. She has a cleaning rag in her pocket and is wearing a blue janitor jumpsuit.
PHOTO: Liliana Drew / Pexels

By: Karen Aylot, Vice President, Care, Compassion, and More Care

Dear SFU community,

As you know, we care a lot about our wonderful employees — like, a lot. In fact, we care so much that it scares us, and we’re afraid that if we cared anymore, we might actually care too much. That is why we continue to employ cleaning and dining staff indirectly through third-party companies, even though employees may wish otherwise.

Don’t worry, though. Whether our employees are contracted in or out of house, we make sure they’re treated fairly. Just don’t ask them. Not because they would tell you otherwise, but because, well, like we said, we just care so much that we want to save them the hassle of having to explain how fairly we treat them. Yeah, we care that much.

You may or may not have seen a report from a few years back analyzing what it would mean for us to contract in vs. out of house. And yes, the report did conclude that switching to direct, in-house contracts for cleaning and dining staff may “improve service quality, progress mission to educate, and enable career pathways,” and “promote SFU’s equity and diversity.” But the report also said that transitioning to in-house contracts might result in more absences, because staff would receive paid time off. We’d hate to see all this caring go to waste for something trivial like a doctor’s appointment or root canal.

And that’s the thing — there is one thing that the analysis failed to take into account. Can you guess what it is? Exactly — just how much we truly care. Some things you just can’t measure — care, love, pay . . . you just can’t put a number on that stuff. But if you really did have to, we can assure you that our out of house staff make an exceptional satisfactory liveable wage. Trust us. You don’t need to look at the living wage for Metro Vancouver and then check out our hourly wage chart. We already checked to save you the trouble, because we care about you too.