Go back

Matt Epp is Ready in Time

Returning with a new take on his folk-pop sound, Matt Epp released his full-length album, Ready in Time, on June 23. The record was foreshadowed by his EP Luma last October. Hailing from Winnipeg, Epp’s Canadian content has been showcased on CBC Music this past month. The songs off Ready In Time maintain a lighter pop sound, despite their serious undertones that diverge from his folk roots.

Epp’s songs follow a narrative style; they tell the listener a story. His sound for this album is mellow and relaxed, with some catchy guitar riffs thrown in. He has power behind his vocals, and he shows that off in songs like “Aftermath” and “Cash & Blood.”

What this album does lack is some cohesion between the themes of the songs. Half of the songs, such as “Let Her Know,” “Go Somewhere,” and “Something Better” seem to address themes of relationships and love, straying the furthest from his original folk sound. Other songs such as “Ready In Time,” “Hard to Say,” and “Cash & Blood” deal with more serious themes and work with a stronger narrative.

“Ready In Time” and “Hard To Say” have clichéd narratives, which feel too simplistic, and as if they are attempting to be more moving than they actually are. “Let Her Know” and “Cash & Blood” have been done before as well. A man loses a girl in “Let Her Know” because he doesn’t value her, and surprise, the “good guy” swoops in and wins her over because he admitted to his feelings. That has been sung before. In “Cash & Blood,” the guilt of first world living when people across the world are suffering feels like too obvious a choice for a “deeper” theme.

Just because the lyrics can be simplistic or cliché at times doesn’t mean the album isn’t enjoyable though. “Cash & Blood” consistently gets stuck in my head, and Matt Epp provides us with some catchy choruses. If you’re interested in some light, fun, summer tunes, there are definitely a few tracks on this album for you, as well as some more thoughtful pieces for you to mull over.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Read Next

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...