Home Blog Page 1305

Over 200 neglected students discovered in quorum mill bust

0

neglected

Shocking: students were forced to participate in student government

By Gary Lim
Photos by Alison Roach

BURNABY — A shocking discovery was made last week when security discovered over 200 students locked in large metal cage in Convocation Mall. The students were found Friday, after library patrons reported whining noises coming from outside.

According to the police report, the students were found in poor condition after spending almost an hour wedged in cramped seats, many of whom apparently rendered deaf from speaker-related ear damage.

First responder Michelle Eckmann gave a grim description of what she came across after cutting through metal grating.

“The first thing I remember, more vividly than anything else was the smell. It burned your eyes and throat. Then we spotted them, the students huddled in the corner. They were clearly confused and afraid; we could see their arms were emaciated and deformed from repeatedly sticking up orange and green pieces of paper.

“Many of them were completely unresponsive, just staring straight ahead, slack-jawed and drooling. The ones we were able to rouse all asked us the same thing if they’d won the iPad, and they kept trying to give us their tickets. We weren’t sure what was going on, or even if we wanted to know.”

On scene medical staff confirmed that the students had been trapped in the fences for upwards of 45 minutes, forced to subsist on nothing but stale coffee and pastries.

Police believe that the students were originally part of an underground voting ring that authorities broke up last month. Chief of security Henry Wallace commented on the discovery.

“It’s disgusting, student government gathers up these big groups of students with the intention of reaching quorum and after they’ve voted themselves stupid they just pick up and leave, leaving the students to fend for themselves.”

Wallace also said, “The students have since been placed under the care of the province, but that’s not an indefinite solution. If not adopted, many of these students will unfortunately be euthanized. But given their state, it’s the humane thing to do.”

Privileged Protest

0

protest

Why we all have the responsibility to be activists

By Joseph Leivdal
Photos courtesy of DGriebelling / Flickr

I’ve spent a few evenings picketing in front of the infamous Pidgin restaurant. I went there because I realized that reading articles and shaking an imaginary fist at developers for their role in displacing people is not enough. The only reason I’m not down there myself, struggling for shelter, has little to do with the decisions I’ve made in my life, and more to do with the fact that I’m just plain fortunate.

Gentrification is not an issue of snappy controversy, nor is it an issue for “democratic debate.” It does not afford the people at the butt-end such comforting luxuries.

No, it is an issue of the wellbeing, dignity, and lives of real people that are no different than you and I — except that they have been marginalized by society and fallen through the cracks of the illusory welfare state.

Gentrification is an issue concerning a government, a city, and its developers, all of whom claim profit and aesthetic values while pushing people out.

And yet they never answer the question: “Where will these people go?”

I will admit that throughout my short activist career, I have avoided getting involved in issues concerning the DTES. I felt like I didn’t know enough and that the social tragedy I was witnessing was beyond my control. I thought that — as a person who has never feared for food, shelter, or dignity — I would feel silly going down there and getting involved.

In fact, this is how many people have critiqued us picketers. The people that I have picketed with are a varied bunch, ranging from university professors to the homeless. But people consistently make comments like: “How can you be for the homeless? All I see are a bunch of yuppies.”

The other day, a man in leather shoes stopped before entering the restaurant, making the point that half of us probably don’t even live in the Downtown Eastside. Indeed, I myself often feel awkward, standing there in boots that cost no less than $150.

My first evening there was the night of the most startling confrontation with my own privilege. A man who had lived in the heart of the Downtown Eastside for 50 years grew infuriated when his questioning revealed that no, we do not live there as well.

At this moment, I felt a strong dissonance within myself; I realized that it is my privilege that also allows me to pick and choose between struggles, aligning myself as an activist with whichever one I please. I was standing side-by-side in solidarity with community members of the DTES, while simultaneously being called out on my privilege; I was coming into their community from the outside, aligning myself with one side of a controversial debate within the DTES about Pidgin.

It is the grand illusion of society today that we are separate from those around us, that our experiences are not linked, that just because nothing bad has happened to you yet, it won’t in the future, and that we dictate our destiny. Ultimately, I came down to the Pidgin picket because I realized that my struggle is wrapped up in the struggle of those in the DTES. I have only avoided such a situation because of my privilege. That is precisely why I have a responsibility to protest.

In fact, my problems are not so different — although they are by no means as severe. I will graduate with over $35,000 of student debt. That’s a minimum monthly payment of over $400 in a job market where it is unlikely that my degree will secure me any employment in my field.

I often think about what my life is going to be like postpost-secondary. Will I be forced to struggle from paycheque to paycheque like my parents and grandparents did, as they worked so hard to make sure the same didn’t happen to me?

There’s a well known quote among activist circles: “If you have come here to help me, you are wasting our time. But if you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together.” This quote has been cited so many times that it has almost lost any sense, but its original meaning still stands true. It is a statement on autonomy; that no one needs a savior, but we all need allies.

It is important to recognize difference. For there to be justice there must be recognition of difference. But we cannot allow recognition to be the end-all be-all; instead, we must recognize our differences so that we may then recognize where we share common ground.

One of the criticisms I often receive when tr ying to raise awareness about student issues in Canada is that we are so well off here that I shouldn’t bother. Perhaps there’s a message in that: not that the privileged among us should abandon struggles that are relevant to us, but rather that we have a responsibility to see how our liberation is bound up with others’, because when push comes to shove, we’re all in it together.

Perhaps I will one day struggle to keep my home, fighting desperately against a system and government that doesn’t care, so that I won’t end up in the streets. Perhaps then I will look around to see who is standing with me.

Ali disqualified from SFSS election

0

The IEC has ruled that former arts rep and victor in the URO race cannot hold office, as she is not registered as a student

By Alison Roach
Photo from flickr

In a letter to the SFSS Board of Directors on Friday, April 5, the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) announced its decision to disqualify Alia Ali from the SFSS 2013 general election. Ali was elected to the University Relations Officer (URO) position last month, beating out second place candidate Brock Balfour by 29 votes.

The official letter, written by IEC chief electoral officer Avery Kwong, states that Ali “failed to produce appropriate documentation regarding her registration as a student at Simon Fraser University.” According to Ali, she was registered for courses this semester, but was forced to withdraw under extenuating circumstances due to personal issues. However, Ali failed to provide documentation regarding her withdrawal to the IEC at any point in the election.

Kwong stated in the letter that Ali promised to provide proof when the registrar accepted the withdrawal and registered as a student, and that the IEC “accepted her promise in good faith.” At the end of the election, when Kwong again solicited for documentation, Ali responded that her withdrawal had been accepted, but still did not provide proof. When Kwong asked again, Ali stopped responding.

However, Ali claims that she is now officially registered as a student, and that she had sent on documentation to Kwong. When Kwong was asked about this claim, he declined to comment.

On why documentation wasn’t required at the beginning of the election process, Kwong said, “Correspondence was sent back and forth during this period, it wasn’t something that the IEC ignored, but again it’s something that I’m not going to comment on at the moment.”

As of press time, Ali has stated that she plans to release an official statement as soon as possible. “It’s not an official decision, from when I talked to Avery. He’s going to talk to the commissioners . . . I think this is still up in the air,” she commented.

In the letter, it is stated that Ali is disqualified, and several options on how to proceed are given. These include the leaving the URO seat vacant, putting runner up Balfour in her place, holding a re-vote for candidates Balfour and Ashleigh Girodat, or holding a by-election in the upcoming fall semester.

When the letter was first released by the IEC, the decision between these options was to be left to the SFSS board of directors, but Kwong later sent out a message to board members saying that the IEC will meet to discuss the issue and choose the best possible solution to recommend at the next board meeting, this Wednesday. “The options that we are considering are not finalized,” said Kwong.

On the definity of the decision, Kwong commented, “[Ali] can’t be appointed. She didn’t necessarily do anything wrong to get disqualified, other than the fact that she’s not eligible.

“She basically is disqualified. That’s what it is, there’s no other word that I can use to describe the situation. . . . There’s no other way I can put it.”

The IEC’s decision will be brought to the SFSS board of directors this Wednesday.

*This story is breaking, and will be updated as more information becomes available

Build SFU selects architect

0


A quick interview with Jana Foit, the project team leader from Perkins+Will for the Build SFU student union building project.

WRCUP 2013

0


The Peak attended The Martlet’s (the student newspaper at UVic) journalism conference last weekend. Take a look at what we saw!

Score: Langdon Auger – Island Nites

Created by: Julian Giordano

SFSS Elections 2013

0

Live coverage of the 2013 SFSS election results.

Tuition Crisis

0

An objective news report on the issue of rising tuition in British Columbia, presenting multiple perspectives ranging from the SFU administration, alumni, and students.

Created by Julian Giordano and Joseph Morton

 

SFSS needs to be held Moe accountable

17

After a weak voter turn out and questionable comments made online, it’s time the student body started asking questions

By Joseph Leivdal

A serious discussion about the SFSS is long overdue. I know it, you know it, the 77 per cent of students who didn’t vote this year know it. More importantly, the newly elected member services officer, Moe Kopahi, needs to hear it.

The cover of a recent issue of The Peak shows newly elected SFSS President Khan revelling in his victory. Khan seems to care about his win, but does anyone else? It’s unfortunate that this image provides such an ironic contradiction to the depressing reality of a 23 per cent voter turnout. But, rather than blame this on student apathy, we need to take a more critical stance of how the SFSS has been operating.

In the past 10 years the SFSS has taken a large conservative swing. What was once a union that celebrated activism and organized students to fight against conservative policies has become a society that rarely extends its critique beyond the need for more student space. From an outsider’s perspective, it is easy to see elections as little more than a popularity contest.

Voter turnout should be taken as an indication that the SFSS does not represent the student body. There’s no question of representation of SFU athletics however, with the SFSS potentially funding a new stadium. But where is the voice against increasing tuition coming from? Student fees? Budget cuts? Things are looking bad when all we see from the SFSS on these issues is an article and an email.

I bet you didn’t even know that Senate is debating the top-down integration of learning outcomes in curriculum, restructuring the very core of student experience at SFU. You would if the SFSS were doing their job.

According to the SFSS, the job of our Member Services Officer is to “act as a liaison between the Board, Forum, and other student groups at the University.” In other words, the MSO is our student union’s diplomatic representative, and carries a heavy burden.

Our newly elected MSO Moe Kopahi, with a whopping 1,962 votes out of 25,000, needs to be reminded of the seriousness of the position, as he recently took to Facebook to swing his whammy of a vote count around to back up some comments he made against feminism.

“If it was about equality, it wouldn’t be called feminism,” he stated, before emphasizing that he does indeed “love” the Women’s Centre, despite their lack of authority in his eyes: “I have seen absolutely nothing from you guys in regards to women issues, at SFU, stop claiming it.” Later, he wrote, “I got 1,962 votes, that speaks for students.” He might represent 1,962 students, but he doesn’t represent the other 23,000, and he certainly doesn’t represent me.

Feminism actually addresses many issues through its critique of patriarchy. The Women’s Centre not only offers alternative resources to individuals of all genders, but also organizes a variety of events on a regular basis that serve the interests of our diverse student body: from Halloween activities for student parents and their children, to campaigning for and raising awareness about student debt.

As the person communicating with groups like the Women’s Centre, it would be nice to see our future MSO doing some research before taking to Facebook. Something is wrong with our union when the MSO, voted in with 1,962 votes on a 23 per cent voter turnout, thinks that he has the authority to speak like this in a public forum.

Is it the role of the SFSS Board to claim authority and act without accountability in our name? Or is it their role to listen to students before claiming to represent them?

Our union was once a respectable institution, speaking up for students and against unfair administration and government policies. While there are a select few individuals who do seem to take their positions seriously, the community needs to engage in a broader discussion about what exactly it is that we expect from our union.

Oldest green lacewing fossils found in Okanagan

0

WEB-Lancewings reasrch-PAMR copy

By Kristina Charania
Photos courtesy of PAMR

After extensive time spent amongst the rocky deposits of Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park, the Okanagan Highlands, and areas of Washington, SFU palaeontologist Dr. Bruce Archibald has unearthed the oldest assemblage of ancient green lacewing insects known to date.
“The insects were finely preserved in such exquisite detail. It really surprised us,” says Archibald. “Some of their soft bodied tissues are clear to see – internal organs at times, too.”

Belonging to the scientific family Chrysopidae, green lacewings is the second largest family of the order Neuroptera. The insects are common garden insects that have large wingspans, golden compound eyes, and bright green bodies.

“They’re regular insects that you’d see around a light at night,” says Archibald. “Organic gardeners really like them for pest control, too. They’re predators and eat plant pests like aphids.”

Dr. Archibald, alongside partner Vladimir Makarkin from the Russian Academy of Sciences, have collected a series of 24 green lacewing fossils from various fossil beds and museums. Although the green lacewings in southern BC and Washington were previously discussed by other palaeontologists, they had not named any particular species in their research — only the insects’ existence in these areas was noted.

Out of the 24 fossil series, at least six genera and 10 new species were present: six of the new species were named, and three of the six genera were newly discovered. The female reproductive spermatheca organ, spermathecal ducts, and trichosor-like structures — thickened wing margins with several hair growths – were observed for the first time in any Chrysopidae fossil. An article further detailing the newlydiscovered insect species has recently been published in the Journal of Palaeontology.

In total, there are currently over 1,200 species of green lacewings worldwide excluding the high latitudes that they cannot inhabit. When the green lacewing fossils formed during the Eocene Epoch, Western Canada was dominated by cooler temperatures year round — less than Vancouver’s average annual temperature at present. This encouraged high levels of insect biodiversity at the time.

Archibald spoke to The Peak and described that the fossils’ formation took place nearly 49–53 million years ago. “There was a lot of uplift in southern BC going into Washington at that time, so many highlands and volcanoes were being formed,” he said. “In this region, there was also a series of lakes that filled up with sediment — different insects and plants from the surrounding forests wound up being trapped in the bottom layer of the mud, and this sediment became the shale that these fossils were found in.”

The classification and examination of these fossilized insects play key roles in larger-scale studies like those conducted by Archibald and other scientists.

Alongside SFU Paleoecology professor Dr. Rolf Mathewes, Archibald is looking at the past diversity of his group of green lacewings and the reasons why a different group within the same family of insects has now become more diverse.

“Green lacewings usually fly in the evening or at night, and they’re vulnerable to predators like bats. Some of the green lacewings have bat ears that can detect bat cries,” Archibald stated. “We’re interested in looking at the relationship between the evolution of bats and the changes in groups of green lacewings relative to their ability to avoid predation.”

By understanding the evolutionary pattern of green lacewings through such studies, researchers can better understand broader aspects of general evolution.

Examining the green lacewings’ climatic preferences relative to large scale climate change over the last 50 million years, will also contribute to better comprehension of broad-scale evolution and patterns of biodiversity.

“In understanding how communities change relative to a transforming climate, we can understand the future better,” Archibald said. “We’re obviously going through a period of great climate change, so it’s best to know all that we can about these patterns.”

Build SFU selects architect

0

WEB-jana Build SFU-Samantha Derochie

Firm Perkins+Will has been awarded the SUB project

By Alison Roach
Photos by Samantha Derochie

The Build SFU student union building project marked another milestone last week as it announced the selection of an architect firm for the project. Vancouver-based, 75-person strong firm Perkins+Will has been awarded the project, and will start site evaluations this summer.

The announcement was officially made in the SFSS Forum meeting last Wednesday by Build SFU general manager Marc Fontaine. “We’re really excited about this announcement,” said Fontaine. “I personally think that Perkins+Will is the best firm with the most experience and . . . students told us that Perkins+Will is the firm that could best represent students, understand best what students need in the building, and actually I feel it was an easy decision.

Perkins+Will was the first of three firms to present to students on Jan. 30, competing against HCMA/Endall Elliot and Dialog for the bid. After the presentations, students, faculty, and community members were invited by the Build SFU team to fill out an online survey with their reactions.

The Build SFU project team gathered 47 responses to the architect presentations that were compiled and presented to the building committee. There were 38 responses from undergraduate students, several from SFU staff and faculty, one from an alumnus, and a letter written by Lorne Davies, expressing his personal support for Perkins+Will.

“The important thing that we focused on was not receiving feedback that wasn’t useful,” said Fontaine. “We wanted to receive feedback that is qualitative and that was informed and really thought out. And we did receive that.”

From this, Perkins+Will was selected. The international firm’s Vancouver office has worked previously on UBC’s Earth Science buildings and SFU’s own Saywell and Blusson halls. One of their team members has personally worked on over 40 student union buildings.

Current SFSS University Relations Officer and Build SFU founder Jeff McCann stated, “The Perkins+Will team excelled throughout all aspects of the architect selection process. Students told us that this firm best understood the goals and aspiration of the Build SFU project. We look forward to this partnership and are confident that Perkins+Will is the best team to help us redefine the student experience.”

Perkins+Will team leader Jana Foit visibly beamed in an inter view with The Peak on being awarded the project. “This is such an exciting project,” Foit said. “We’re just ecstatic to start work and to be able to bring something that’s so meaningful to students and to be able to deliver that here. It’s a great opportunity.”

Foit also recognized the challenges that face the student-led project, especially concerning the multitude of voices that will undoubtedly inundate the consultation process.

“There’s a lot of opinions and students will definitely have opinions, but I think it’s exciting because students also have a lot of vision,” said Foit. “They’re not as cynical or dissuaded as someone who’s been doing this for a long time. You’re looking at tomorrow, you guys are looking at innovation, and you’re interested in those things.”
The firm hasn’t defined a firm plan for student consultation, but it is certain that there will be six to eight weeks of intensive consultation at the beginning of the fall semester. Foit mentioned holding workshops with different user group representatives, a goal-setting workshop, and social media feedback as several facets of communication that may be implemented. The idea of even using the platform Instagram to allow students to send photos of how they see their university is also
being considered.

The architect selection has gone through the SFSS board of directors, with a tentative price tag of $326,500 approved for the first phase of work. The full cost of the firm for the project is unknown at this point. In the latest SFU Board of Governor’s meeting on March 14, the Finance and Administration Committee also noted that the process to select the architect for the Build SFU project has ended, and the award of contract was put before the board and approved. Perkins+Will has been approved for the entire SUB project, but as of now has only been hired for phase one, involving site selection and programming of the building.

The official price-tag for the architect for the SFSS is complicated by the fact that the university has agreed to finance additional renovations to the Lorne Davies building if it ends up becoming the site of the project.

In regards to the cost of the architect for the entire project, Fontaine explained: “The architect has been hired, but it includes that cost that the university would pay for, and it’s and up-to amount rather than a defined amount.” He went on to say that Perkins+Will was within the price range expected for the project.
“ We have confidence that the price for Perkins+Will is appropriate, and it’s a price that is not too low to deliver what we need from the project.”

Moving forward, Perkins+Will will spend the summer semester working on site selection studies to identify three possible sites for the building, which are currently unknown. Heavy student consultations will begin in the fall, culminating in a report with a site recommendation and review of the building programming to be put forward in November. The firm will then most likely be rehired to continue the project, and begin working full-time on it in 2014.

Build SFU also plans to hire two new staff members this summer, one working in administration and one dedicated to student consultation.
Fontaine concluded, “I’m thrilled with the architect selection. It is my choice absolutely . . . This firm stood out in terms of meeting [our] objectives, and I think Perkins+Will will have no trouble in determining in consultations with students what can make our building the best that it can be for this university.”

For a more personal look at Perkins+Will check out the interview with Jana Foit: