Home Blog Page 1232

Let children swear

0

NEW WESTMINSTER (CUP) — Profanity is a rite of passage. No matter how innocently we begin, at one point or another we all end up saying those socially frowned upon words. Sure, I believe in a more sophisticated form of language — the kind I dress up in for my grandma or bring into a job interview — but those words lack substance.

They feel fake, forced, and pretentious. Like educated grunts from the time of cavemen, swearing brings human interaction back to the ground level. When used properly, it can express honest emotions without any blurred lines. The pent-up rage we feel can often lead to physical violence, if not for the ability to curse. The freedom to swear allows us to be verbally confident — and that shouldn’t be limited to adults.

In 2010, a Sociolinguistics Symposium study showed that children are swearing earlier than ever, escalating at around ages three to four. The fingers were quick to point at television, music, and vulgar parents, but perhaps the problem isn’t the parents or the children; perhaps the problem is culture.

Children are intelligent and they are quick to understand irrational rules, such as the “Do as I say, not as I do” rule. Swearing doesn’t hurt anybody after all; once they realize this they abuse it, especially out of parental earshot.

We often associate swearing with anger and hostility, but most of the time we swear when we are excited. “This food is goddamn delicious,” or “This is the best fucking song ever.” Perhaps we could do without the “goddamn” and the “fuck,” but then it would be a completely different reaction. Inhibiting the ability to express emotion is more crippling than a few innocuous words.

Once censorship is removed, swearing becomes the norm and not an urge to be defiant. Without risk, there is no adrenaline, and children will begin to use swear words selectively the way intelligent adults do. For parents, omitting the taboo will also cancel out the hypocrisy of telling a child not to swear.

Communicating with children like they’re adults is not a hindering act; it’s one of respect, showing that the child is just as smart or has the capacity to be as smart as we are.

In an article published by the Association of Psychological Science, a study showed that swearing takes up an insignificant 0.3 per cent to 0.7 per cent of our daily speech. Profanity is universal and can be found in virtually every language. Although North American culture still uses it to separate high-class from the low-class, there is no proof that people with greater wealth are swearing any less than those in poverty.

Of course we can give our children those swearing training wheels — words like “fudge,” “darn,” and “shoot” — but no matter how you sugarcoat their potty talk, you are not saving them from the inevitable. I’m sorry to say it, Mom and Dad, but your sweet, innocent child is going to cuss and they’ll use those words to talk back to you one day, the same way I did with my parents. The earlier we let our children swear, the less of a problem it becomes.

Let’s not forget

0

WEB-white poppy-allen denny-flickr copy

With Remembrance Day coming up, several university students in Ottawa, along with the Rideau Institute, plan on handing out white poppies as an alternative to the red poppies we wear to commemorate the day. Promoting his pacifist ideology, Celyn Dufay of the University of Ottawa claims that the red poppy celebrates war. According to Dufay, rather than doing this, “Young people . . . want to work for peace.”

Dufay and the Rideau Institute are getting confused as to what the red poppy really means. Bill Maxwell, secretary of the Royal Canadian Legion’s poppy remembrance committee, is correct when he says that the poppy is “a symbol of sacrifice.” It’s also a symbol of peace.

It is a way to honour the numerous Canadian soldiers who sacrificed their lives for that peace. Conservative MP Erin O’Toole is correct in saying, “to run a simultaneous (white poppy) campaign that really detracts from the day I think is not only inappropriate, it actually undermines the message.”

The irony in this situation is that the red poppy symbolizes the veterans who sacrificed their lives to allow Canadians like Dufay liberty enough to distribute this message countering it. White poppies use and insult the freedom that soldiers fought and died for.

However shocking this is, there are positive points to take from it. Sure, these white poppy protesters may be acting grossly ignorant, but they also bring our attention to the issue of the poppy’s true meaning. If our beliefs are left dormant for too long, we act simply out of habit without really thinking about or understanding them; we lose the spirit of these actions. They become dead dogma.

The introduction of this opposing view forces us to think about why we wear red poppies on Remembrance Day in the first place. The very astute philosopher John Stuart Mill says that dissent, even if mis-guided, keeps the truth against which it dissents alive. In light of this, opposing opinions should never be suppressed.

Even if they may seem morally wrong, activist organizations like the Rideau Institute remind us of why we do what we do: they invigorate our emotions of remembrance and gratitude for our Canadian soldiers, lest we forget.

Sexual Harassment and Gender Segregated Transit

0

Estefania Duran hosts another episode of Shut Up and Listen, inviting Alison Roach, Mohamed Sheriffdeen and Paul Zeke to talk about the issue of harassment on public transit, and the recent consideration of creating women-only Skytrain cars.

Questions? Comments? Want to be a part of the show? Shoot us an email at [email protected]

Hosted by Estefania Duran. Created by Brandon Hillier

SFU student snaps up international photography award

1

connor

 

An SFU student has made history by becoming the first North American to win the prestigious Eric Hosking Portfolio Award, which honours the best young wildlife photographers from around the globe.

Co-sponsored by BBC Worldwide and London’s Natural History Museum, the award is given to the photographer with the best submitted portfolio of six to 10 photos. According to competition criteria, while choosing the recipient of the award, judges were looking for “fresh, innovative, creative and challenging images of the natural world.”

As stated by the website, “being shortlisted in this competition is something to which photographers across the world aspire.” For Connor Stefanison, who had submitted portfolios twice before, this was his year to win. “I tried really hard to get as many good photos as I could,” said Stefanison. “All of the photos except for the hot springs photo have been taken since last year’s deadline.”

Stefanison, 22, is currently completing a biology degree in ecology and conservation at SFU — however, his true passion lies not in the lab, but behind the lens.

Stefanison first became interested in photography while riding the trails of the North Shore and Burnaby Mountain. He made the transition from sports to wildlife photography after visiting a camera club that had a strong nature focus with his friend and his friend’s father.

“I kind of instantly got into it from that,” explained Stefanison. “I went on some camping the summer right after and I’d just go taking pictures of all the birds . . . the wildlife stuff came pretty naturally to me.”

Stefanison attributes his ease with wildlife photography in part to his experiences hunting, fishing, and trapping. “I think hunting has really helped a lot, just understanding animal behaviour,” said Stefanison. “And also hunting and fishing both have led me to know a lot of really good locations to go to. I have a lot of really good loon locations and that’s all from fishing.”

 

“Being shortlisted in this competition is something to which photographers across the world aspire.”

– Natural History Museum website

 

Of the six pictures that were chosen from his portfolio, each presented a unique challenge to Stefanison.

“The most difficult was definitely the barred owl flying, because I didn’t know how to use multi-flash before the picture and I hadn’t really used flash all that much,” said Stefanison. “A really tricky part was pressing the shutter at the right time because the owl’s flying by so fast and if you click it a little bit too late all you see are tail feathers and legs. But, if you click it too early, the owl is really small, so it took about two weeks of trying to get that right.”

In the photo entitled “Silent Flight,” Stefanison spent about a week and a half trying to get the blur effect right on the snowy owl. He also spent hours approaching the loon in “Evening Peace,” trying to make it comfortable, before snapping the winning shot.

Although originally deciding not to submit the picture “Lucky Pounce,” Stefanison was convinced by his friend and former editor of National Geographic to include it in his portfolio. “I didn’t think it was very original and the contest really looks for originality, but she insisted that I enter it, just because it’s a portfolio and it adds some diversity to it,” explained Stefanison. “Lucky” for Stefanison, this photo was one of the six that won him the distinguished prize.

 

“Vancouver is probably the best big city in North America for wildlife photography.”

– Connor Stefanison, SFU student

 

For would-be wildlife photographers, Stefanison has some tips and tricks that he feels may give newcomers to the industry an edge.

“One thing that I see a lot of beginners doing that I personally would like to see less of is cropping in really tight after they take a picture,” said Stefanison. “It’s often more pleasing to leave a lot of environment in the photos.”

He also advised photographers to take advantage of local opportunities. “A lot of people think, ‘Oh, I live in Vancouver, I can’t shoot wildlife because I live in the city,’ but Vancouver is probably the best big city in North America for wildlife photography.”

“There are so many great nature spots and good bird opportunities . . . exploring what you have around your neighbourhood would be a really good thing.”

Stefanison’s photos will be part of an exhibition at the Natural History Museum until March 2014.

Burning loins: the anti-rom-com

0

5D_IMG_5494

This year, the Vancouver International Film Festival this year was host to 340 movies from over 75 different countries, but one of the most talked about films on this year’s line up was That Burning Feeling, directed by SFU alumni Jason James. Winner of VIFF’s Best Canadian First Feature award, the film challenges and enhances the romantic comedy genre — and was filmed completely in Vancouver.

The Peak sat down with James and he talked about That Burning Feeling and what brought it to life. He was inspired to make this film by watching cheesy airplane movies. “I like to watch the biggest, dumbest movie possible; there is something poetic about watching these big movies on these tiny little shitty screens.” James also mentioned his “love hate relationship with rom-coms,” adding that “some of the best films made are of that genre and some of the worst films made are of that genre.”

James knew he wanted to create a rom-com that would hold true to the genre and address a new topic, usually dismissed as unromantic. He called up his writer, Nick Citton, and they got to work, whittling away at the concepts and characters until they created something they could stand behind.

The duo wanted to make a romantic, heartwarming movie about something off-putting: gonorrhea. That’s right, gonorrhea. A big challenge was securing backing for a film that addresses the situational humour of STIs.

Within the first few minutes of the film, Adam Murphy (Paolo Costanzo) is diagnosed with gonorrhea and must inform all his sexual partners of the past 30 days. The thing is, Adam has slept with — and thus must get in contact with — a good number of women. Like any rom-com, That Burning Feeling has a bad guy, a funny friend, a love interest, and a flawed protagonist. It follows the formula, but adds its own flair to create a memorable and enjoyable film.

James is the brain behind Resonance Films, a Vancouver-based production company, and is responsible for acclaimed films in both the Toronto and Vancouver International Film Festivals. He also worked on This Space is for Rent, a well-known dramedy on CBC.

Graduating from SFU in 2000 with a double major in communications and film, James has been wanting to make movies ever since he was nine years old (when his family bought their first good camera): “It’s what I’ve always wanted to do, what I’ve always done, like every single step I’ve made in my life has been towards becoming a filmmaker.”

At the end of our conversation, James offered some advice on how to make it big: “Make bad movies, because you have to start making bad ones to eventually make good ones. You actually start learning when you’re in the real world.”

The Hand That Rocks the Cradle

0

CMYK-Childcare-BCNDP_Flickr

If the old adage is correct and prostitution is the world’s first profession, childcare must be the second. Long before the days of professional childcare, parents have struggled to balance raising their children and supporting their families.

In this day and age, many families struggle with the search for affordable, adequate childcare. After all, this decision dictates the well-being of your child; not anyone can be trusted with such a duty. Complaints of all sorts commonly surface about inadequate child care, whether it be unsatisfactory education, overfull daycare centers, or even cases of child abuse. In a market where demand exceeds supply, waiting lists for professional child care centers are far from short.

Another common complaint is the affordability of childcare services. Child care has an uncanny ability to burn a hole in parents’ pockets. In our sputtering economy, it becomes essential for parents to reenter the workforce not long after having children. Not all families have the funds to allow for one working parent and one stay-at-home parent, and naturally, daycare is the most convenient alternative.

However, professional child care centers cannot keep up with the growing number of parents who require care for their children. Rising costs force parents to turn to unregistered and unregulated home care services, sometimes sacrificing quality and safety for cost — not necessarily a sacrifice parents should be making with regard to their children.

Taking this into account, it may appear that childcare should be a pertinent concern in decision-making circles; however, it is not. The Canadian government remains engaged in a long and mostly fruitless debate over publicly-funded, subsidized child care. The only province to make headway on this front has been Quebec, which has had subsidized, provincial daycare since 1997.

Quebec’s current policy offers childcare for $7 a day across the board to families of all social classes, under a waitlist program open to all Quebec citizens. Under a $2.2 billion dollar budget, the province of Quebec plans to decrease the unemployment rate, improve child development and create opportunities for lower socioeconomic classes.

The province has promised to provide universal childcare by 2016, in lieu of their current program which often involves long wait times for parents in need of health care. The province is already well on its way towards increasing the number of subsidized child care locations: they now number at over 230 000, compared to only 77 000 when the program began.

Though Quebec’s program has incited envy from parents across the rest of Canada — many of whom foot thousands of dollars a month to afford adequate child care services — the province’s subsidized child care system faces hard critics.

In this day and age, many families struggle with the search for affordable, adequate childcare.

One of the leading critiques introduces the sacrifice of quality for quantity. With a subsidized daycare program coming into effect in Quebec, the demand for child care has skyrocketed. Parents across the province have crawled out of the woodwork in search of $7 a day childcare. The problem arises in the quantity of available resources — there are only a limited number of professional daycare centers that the province can subsidize.

This results in over-capacitated daycares overflowing with disproportionate child-to-carer ratios, and capitulation to homecare centers, which have been heavily criticized for paying insufficient attention to children. In recent years, multiple child deaths have been reported due to inattention in home daycares — not a reassuring fact for parents.

Not only does the high demand for subsidized childcare force parents to turn to home care, it also pushes professional centers beyond their maximum capacity. With childcare institutions stretched to the maximum, successful development and educational benefits to the child can be lost.

In 2011, the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY), a research survey studying a range of youth across Canada, concluded that children in subsidized daycares below school age perform inadequately compared to their counterparts in other provinces with unregulated daycares — an astonishing result under a policy that strives to increase children’s educational development. According to the NLSCY, Quebec’s subsidized child care may do more harm than good.

Another problem stemming from excess demand for Quebec’s child care services is unbearably long waiting lists. Parents are sometimes forced to wait beyond a year for daycare openings, or take spots that are inconveniently distant from their homes and work. Though the province’s upcoming policy changes attempt to fix these issues, many Quebecois remain skeptical.

One of the most outspoken critics of Quebec’s child care programs is none other than Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The Conservative PM has firmly established his stance on universal health care: in his view, it is simply not beneficial to Canadians. After scraping the budget to expand subsidized child care across all provinces, Harper plans to provide child care subsidies in other formats.

“We took money from bureaucrats and lobbyists and gave it to the real experts on child care, and their names are mom and dad!” Harper said in a keynote address on June 10, 2011, regarding his Universal Child Care Benefit policy, which aims to provide families with $100 a month for every child under six. However, Harper — firmly entrenched in his own conservative economic policies — refuses to entertain the idea of truly universal child care.

Amid persistent complaints on the subject of universal, subsidized childcare, Quebec has produced outstanding and underpublicized results. The benefits of subsidized daycare in Quebec are substantial, and ultimately outweigh the risks.

To begin, the province of Quebec now serves 70 per cent of children with subsidized daycare. In a 15 year period, this is a profound achievement. The province has promised to achieve a space for every child by 2016, and is well on its way. Quebec has demonstrated that the development of infrastructure in the childcare sector is possible; however, it will take hard work, a sizeable chunk of the province’s budget, and a long-term mindset.

But statistics have already begun to speak to Quebec’s success. In the last 10 years, child poverty in the province has been reduced by 50 per cent. To put it simply, in the last decade, the number of children living below the national poverty line has been cut in half. The connection lies in the increased number of adults able to enter the workforce, increasing family incomes, resulting in better socioeconomic conditions for growing children.

As the first Canadian province to implement universal child care, Quebec is still on the learning curve.

The full essence of this phenomenon cannot be observed until this generation of universal child care children grow into adults. Studies of a quantitative as well as qualitative nature have shown that impoverished children have high chances of remaining in poverty into adulthood. It will be interesting to see the effects that subsidized child care may have in the long-term. With fewer children raised in impoverished households, will the coming decades see a decrease in Quebecois poverty at large?

Since the province introduced its policy of universal child care in 1997, Quebecois public school test scores have gone from some of the lowest to some of the highest in Canada. The effects of subsidized childcare on education are just beginning to be seen.

Women have also been empowered by these policies, to the benefit of the Quebecois economy. Though gender roles are becoming progressively less prominent in parenting, some traditions have yet to subside: according to Statistics Canada, in 2009, mothers accounted for 88 per cent of stay-at-home parents in the country. In modern Canada, women still commonly trade their place in the workforce and the pursuit of higher education in order to stay at home with their children.

Since the introduction of subsidized child care in Quebec, the province now has more women enrolled in postsecondary education than any other province in Canada. Quebec also has an outstanding 74 per cent of women with children under age six in the workforce. Not only is this increase in gender equality beneficial to women, it also has substantial economic benefits: it can be said that Quebec’s $2.2 billion dollar childcare budget has been heavily funded by the increase of women in the labour force. Tax benefits from working mothers cover almost 40 per cent of the total cost of the child care program. Essentially, the program is funding half of itself.

Quebec’s child care program does have its flaws — waiting lists, unbalanced carer to child ratios, commutes to the daycares. However, the program has only been in effect for 15 years, and its full repercussions cannot yet be accurately observed. As the first Canadian province to implement universal child care into their budget, Quebec is still on the learning curve. A program like this is not a short-term plan; it will take time to perfect.

Take Finland, for example; arguably the most developed universal child care provider, with some of the highest literacy scores and education levels in the world. Finland provides universal child care for children between the ages of 18 months and five years, when Finnish children begin elementary school.

Though we now tend to think of this system as utopian, the benefits derived from Finland’s universal child care program did not happen overnight: The nation’s first policies introducing subsidized child care were introduced in the early 1970s, but Finland did not achieve full universal childcare until 1990. Only after decades of hard work and perseverance have the full benefits of the program been observed.

Quebec is already beginning to detect flaws in the system, and make revisions accordingly. In September of this year, the province announced that in 2014 they will be opening an online waiting list database. Parents will no longer be forced to seek out daycares themselves; instead, the database will find the closest, most suitable daycare for them with the shortest waiting list, hopefully reducing commutes for parents and making it easier for parents to find open spots.

The benefits of subsidized daycare in Quebec are substantial, and ultimately outweigh the risks.

Like any successful social program, Quebec’s system will take time to fully develop. Instead of focusing on the harsh critiques, we should focus on the positive benefits achieved in only 15 years. In its short lifespan, Quebec has made admirable progress toward a universal child care system that has significant social and economic effects on families of all socioeconomic classes across the province.

The benefits derived from foreign universal child care policies and Quebec’s new system have gone exceptionally unnoticed in Canada. Many Canadians are unaware that any kind of subsidized child care exists anywhere in the country, and Stephen Harper’s child care budget is ultimately ineffective when parents foot thousands a month on daycare services.

An aging population requires a greater workforce, and more babies that need caring for. As proven in Quebec, subsidized childcare can be an answer to these problems. So, why is this so underpublicized, if not condemned, by Canadian decision-makers? Maybe this is a product of the neoliberal ideology embedded in our conservative government to privatize and commodify everything, with no concern toward the ever-increasing inequality in our country — or maybe childcare is simply not on the agenda.

Whatever the cause of such lack of attention to the possible benefits of subsidized childcare, it is undeniable that Quebec’s system has made significant social and economic improvements to the province, and should be considered a viable option for the rest of Canada.

Student project documents harassment on TransLink

0

WEB-translink girls-mark burnham

If you’ve ever had an uncomfortable situation on TransLink and didn’t know what to do, there’s now a website for that. “Harassment on Translink” was started by SFU students Katie Nordgren and Alexa Dredge as a project for their GSWS course, and aims to raise awareness of unwanted attention on local transit — attention that is mostly gender-based — by posting anonymous stories of harassment on TransLink services.

Nordgren and Dredge launched the blog on Oct. 21 with the mandate to “compile stories of these experiences to demonstrate the reality and severity of this particular issue to TransLink and the City of Vancouver.” Since then, the project has been covered by various local media outlets, including CBC, Huffington Post, and The Province.

Since starting to gather personal stories, the duo has defined three categories of perpetrators of harassment: the drunk or disorderly, the criminally aggressive, and the “nominally ‘well-intentioned’ romantic,” as they put it. The latter refers to the everyday instigator of conversation who does not intend malice, but who will not respond to social cues that indicate discomfort or disinterest.

 

“Public transit straddles the territory between a private and public space and is therefore difficult to moderate.”

– Alexa Dredge, SFU student

 

The creators have posted a disclaimer on the website to address the misconception that they are in some way pinpointing individuals who were perpetrating this harassment, specifically the mentally ill. Nordgren and Dredge expressed that they are not pointing fingers at any one group, including TransLink, and stated that the issue goes much deeper than that.

“We’d like to facilitate discussion in a manner which neither blames TransLink nor individualizes the problem by placing the responsibility for intervention solely on those who are being harassed,” said Dredge.

“We think that gender socialization is a real culprit here,” added Nordgren, who went on to discuss how learned gender roles play into this scenario, stating that in its simplest form, men are taught to be assertive and to go after what they want; conversely, women often feel like they must be polite and engage in conversations they may not want to have.

Nordgren and Dredge were careful to stress that blame should not fall on victims of harassment. “We want to be careful not the put the burden of protection on the victims of harassment and assault,” said Nordgren. “We truly believe that nobody deserves to be violated, whether that’s physically or socially, and that when people are victimized, we do them no services by asking what they could’ve done differently to avoid being hurt.”

This being said, in the moment that the incident is happening, there are a number of ways to de-escalate the situation (see sidebar).

“In order to promote equal engagement in our communities, public services must be equally accommodating and inviting,” said Dredge. “Additionally, it may be women who disproportionately need transit because of economic reasons.”

She continued, “Public transit straddles the territory between a private and public space and is therefore difficult to moderate.”

“Much like the anti-rape slogan of ‘no means no,’ no still means no outside of a bedroom context,” stressed Nordgren. Some argue that it is already difficult to address strangers in this city and that this attitude would serve to further alienate people from one another. Not so, said Dredge.

“We don’t necessarily want to promote antisociality or vilify someone for trying to strike up a conversation, but to be conscious of the line between acceptable and unwanted attention,” she explained. “Disregarding a refusal . . . indicates a lack of respect for personal limits and is threatening — even if the person transgressing them intends to be complimentary.”

The dynamic duo see their biggest priority being getting their mandate out to more people to collect their stories, but would love to eventually partner with TransLink in order to develop tangible solutions.

In fact, they are well on their way: since their unexpected media spotlight, the women have been in touch with Transit Police through media relations person, Anne Drennan. Nordgren lauded their support, as the media pressure has led TransLink to reveal ahead of schedule the strategies they had been planning to implement addressing this issue, which include an app, a text alert system, and a system-wide anti-harassment campaign.

Nordgren and Dredge have experienced some negative attention, but responses have generally been supportive, an encouraging sign that as a community, it is possible to address even those issues that are embedded in our everyday as we vie for greater change.

Play House: celebrating the work of Daniel Evan White

0

connell_Connell 10

Play House, the first retrospective of Vancouver-based modernist architect Daniel Evan White, opened this month at the Museum of Vancouver. White designed public buildings, pre-fabricated cabins, modest houses, new housing prototypes, and some of the most unique residences in Vancouver throughout his career, which spanned from 1960 to 2012.

Though White never identified with a particular style or group and his work is not easily categorized, the curators showcase some of his most lauded residences and attempt to understand his work in the context of both local and international architecture.

In the 1,800 square foot exhibition — the same square footage as White’s Máté Residence in West Vancouver — and even smaller reception room at the opening reception of Play House, every person looks comfortable and polished. This is partly due to the dress code: whether guests dressed in black or white or both, the dress-code is a preview of the almost entirely black and white exhibition in the next room.

The décor adds to this effect: black and white pins and magnets are scattered from the coat check to the bar and from the interactive children’s table to guest’s lapels. The pins and magnets are black squares with assorted white geometric patterns on them. These, the woman at coat check explains, represent aerial-view reductions of White’s houses.

The dozens of commissioned maquettes (scale models) in the exhibit are white with black accents. The photocopies of floor plans, and most of the photographs pinned to the timeline of his work, are in black and white. Photographs in colour have faded over the past four decades; snippets from recent articles about the architect are in vivid colours, as are the building blocks and instructions at the children’s table. Despite these splashes of colour, there is a refinement to the whole tableau, as though it is black text on a white page.

The textual pieces within the exhibition, which supplement the maquettes and the timeline of the architect’s work, left me with more questions than answers. I was frustrated when I reached a certain passage of text, a biographical tidbit about White, copied for the third time; however, the secondary material on the MOV’s website is informative.

The series of interviews between MOV curator Vivianne Gosselin and guest curators Greg Johnson and Martin Lewis, from the UBC School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (SALA), expand upon the exhibition. Insights from the three curators, who were present and approachable at the opening, are significant given that there are not many other places to look for information about White. The team worked toward the finished presentation alongside the late White’s office and family; this was, as the curators expressed, an asset to the exhibition.

My frustration about the supplementary text aside, asking questions is the groundwork of studying the lifetime work of an artist in any discipline. This detailed exhibit introduces Vancouverites to one of our outstanding artists, and it will hopefully inspire more studies of his work as well as an appreciation for the architecture he has created in our community.

Local jogger apprehended after running from police

1

VANCOUVER — A man was brought into custody early this morning after running past a police squad car, and therefore clearly guilty of some sort of crime.

According to the police officer on duty, he saw the man through his car window and was forced to put down his donut and call down the block to see why he was running.

When confronted, the alleged jogger simply turned his head and pointed to the earphones he had on at which point the officer called for back up and started to pursue on foot. The runner was able to elude capture for several minutes until another officer cut him off with his vehicle and proceeded to tackle the suspect to the ground.

“I was just out for a morning jog,” explained the confused middle aged man in response to the police’s interrogation about his odd behaviour.

At this point the baffled officer could only produce the word “Why?” before demanding that the man “just tell them the truth about why he was running.”

Despite the jogger’s ramblings about “healthy lifestyles” and “fitness regiments,” the officer still couldn’t see any sense in his actions.

Confused and suspicious of these answers, the police questioned the suspects neighbours who provided some shocking insight into his past.

“Yeah, he gets up early  and runs at least three times a week,” said a next door neighbour.  “I always thought it was a bit strange, but he says he enjoys it.”

However, police have refused to believe such an unorthodox theory that goes against all common sense. “It just doesn’t make sense . . . he must be hiding something,” the officer told The Peak in utter bewilderment.

The jogger will be held in custody while his actions are investigated. In the event that he is telling the truth and he does just enjoy jogging, police recommend that he be committed to a mental institute where he would be treated until he is deemed to be of a sound mind.

Experiential learning should be mandatory

0

WEB-field school-penn state news-flickr copyOf the many problems that face the latest batches of 20-something undergraduate degree holders, like living with the existence of Grown Ups 2, or being unable to buy alcohol at grocery stores, perhaps the greatest are unemployment and a lack of employable skills. A large gap exists between what is taught in many degree programs and what is needed to be employed in the field that a particular degree leads to, which results in difficulty obtaining gainful employment.

A solution to this issue is mandating experiential learning, or learning through practicing a skill, as part of an undergraduate degree.

As Canada progresses further into the 21st century, a university education is becoming less and less valuable. The Financial Post reports cost of a bachelor’s degree is 20 per cent higher than it was in the late 2000s, while the unemployment rate for those who complete the degree is just under two percent lower than high school graduates.

While fields with tangible applications such as engineering, math, computer science, and commerce-related areas do tend to fare better in terms of earning potential and employability, there is no reason the same utility cannot be added to many other areas of study through the use of experiential learning.

Experiential learning already exists at most universities across the country as Co-operative Education programs. However, with the exception of some programs in Applied Sciences, these opportunities are optional and undertaken by a disproportionately small number of students. One only has to look towards trade programs, which integrate mandatory practicums into their curriculums, to see that they provide the necessary skills to train prospective workers for the so-called ‘real world.’

Some might say, though, that the goal of universities is solely to create more enlightened and educated individuals rather than train workers. But university students who are currently facing a hostile job market and mounting debt would most likely argue with this. The employment market has evolved from rewarding any degree holder with a position in their field to a more competitive model valuing experience over education. Therefore, eventually higher education needs to adjust its aims towards the needs of the provincial and national job market.

If academia can learn anything from trade schools and vocational programs, it is that in-class works cannot be used as a substitute for actual on-the-job training. What is learned in a textbook or from a professor tends to be based in idealistic theory rather than a pragmatic approach to the material.

Therefore, a mandatory practicum-system implemented into all undergraduate degrees would not only improve the student’s employability, but his or her learning experience as well. After all, if you would not hire a plumber who had never snaked a drain before, why then would you hire a public relations officer who had never drafted a press release?