Home Blog Page 873

SFU groups among hundreds marching for climate justice

1
Protestors converged on the convention centre where the PM was meeting with premiers.

[dropcap]The[/dropcap] droning of bagpipes mingled with New Orleans-style jazz as SFU’s School for the Contemporary Arts and other activists paraded to the First Ministers’ Meeting this Thursday. The parade ended at the Vancouver Convention Centre where the Prime Minister and Premiers were discussing the economy and climate change. Last Thursday, the ministers signed the Vancouver Convention which, among other things, agrees in principle on a national carbon tax.

Parade-goers were costumed as various aquatic life forms, as well as the remnants of carbon-based fuels, while hoisting signs demanding action on climate change. SFU professor Laura Marks carried a banner made from 80 letters addressed to Prime Minister Trudeau and BC Premier Christy Clark.

The letters were written at a “happening” — an event — hosted at SFU Woodward’s on Saturday February 27. Passersby concerned about the environment were invited to write letters to the Prime Minister and Premier of BC, as well as give a statement on video.

On the other end of the spectrum, the Vancouver chapter of activist group Raging Grannies sang cheeky protest songs to the tune of ‘Puff the Magic Dragon’ and other classics. The group was founded in Victoria in 1986 in order to protest the presence of US Navy nuclear-powered ships in Victoria Harbour, and have made regular appearances at events in Vancouver. They called the government to account for remaining idle on climate change, singing, “The world needs action, heaven knows / listen up, you carbon schmoes!”

At the end of the parade, a crowd of about 200 gathered outside to hear speakers from environmental and indigenous groups, all of whom demanded that the government does more to combat climate change.

During the opening ceremonies, First Nations activist Audrey Siegl accused the government of saying “a few condescending words and then it is business as usual” in reference to a statement by Trudeau that supported exporting oil in order to fund the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Speaking to the dangerous effects of climate change, Chief Bob Chamberlain of the Kwikwasut’inuxw Haxwa’mis First Nation plainly stated that, “it’s going to be the First Nations on the front line of suffering yet again,” explaining that many communities are dependent on the land for at least part of their sustenance.

Marks explained that the “happening” was meant to strike a different tone than a typical protest. Said Marks, “this event is to let people know that activism can be fun and ‘cool’ and enjoyful,” and to celebrate the successes that have happened. When The Peak asked why SFU students should care about climate change, she replied plainly that “we know SFU students care about the climate,” noting the “great deal of environmental activism at SFU,” from various student groups such as Embark and SFPIRG.

The upcoming First Ministers’ Meeting may have implications for local energy projects, such as the proposed LNG plant on BC’s coast and the TransMountain Pipeline expansion. In late January[dropcap][/dropcap], the National Energy Board (NEB) heard final arguments for and against the proposed expansion set to be constructed on Burnaby Mountain.

Many environmental groups, as well as the Province of British Columbia, the City of Vancouver, and the City of Burnaby have voiced their opposition to the project, which would allow the pipeline to transport 890,000 barrels of bitumen per day. The NEB has until May 20 to make its final recommendation on whether or not to approve the pipeline.

COLUMN | TIM’S BIT: Age simply doesn’t matter

0

Tim’s Bit: Tirades on our stupidest things. . . is a new web-exclusive column featuring Tim Mottishaw’s comedic tirades on some of our humanity’s dumbest problems, with regards to culture, society and politics. Read more Tim’s Bit here!


 

[dropcap]M[/dropcap]y birthday was a couple weeks ago; a day that often makes me being a bit pensive. My birthday is when I decide to try something new, and modify something in my life I am not a fan of. This year I’ve decided to take up yoga, and the thing I’m modifying is the use of an age in numbers.

A birthday is an odd occasion, when you consider it. It’s sort of counter-cultural. Most people celebrate it with a social gathering of some kind. Some people have grand parties and make big deals about their birthdays. I, myself, try to do an activity (This year I was lucky enough to be in Australia and went hiking in Springbrook).

Though, it’s odd how we hold these parties to celebrate ‘me’ and ‘how old I am,’ and then for the rest of the year we hear nothing but criticisms about how old or young we are.

As kids we want nothing more than to ‘be a big kid.’ As a teen we continue that struggle to be older because hormones get the better of us, and in the end we have no idea what we want or know. These are really the only times in our lives when we have an excuse for stupidity. Then we turn 18: we can drive, vote, and fight in most countries. By 21, most people across the globe can vote, drink, and all the rest of it. At 25, the UN stops statistically counting you as a youth, and insurance companies deem you worthy of a new charging scheme.

Then what? Nothing. Not one ‘special occasion’ that has anything to do with your age until maybe 50, though usually the next big number is 65, when you retire.

I think that age is what we use to categorize so much we forget that it is only an indication of how long we have circled the sun.

There are forty years of stressing about perceiving yourself as too old, striving to be younger, and always feeling pressure to modify the decade you are actually in: 30 is the new 20, 40 is the new 30. Why? Perhaps it has to do with the financial dynamics of our current generation. More people are staying at home later in life because it’s simply too damn expensive to move out. If my parents lived in Vancouver, I would gladly live with them. Also, because we are now living longer, the idea of doing everything while you can is not as important as when our parents or grandparents were younger.

I blame our weird obsession with the actual age in years. I think that age is what we use to categorize so much we forget that it is only an indication of how long we have circled the sun.

I don’t own a car, I don’t have a boyfriend, I don’t have kids, I don’t own a home. I love and read comics, I have a love for Superman and the Flash. I love hiking, swimming, the beach, and travelling. I am in my third year of university, and my biggest consumption outside of school and work is my Star Wars and Dungeons & Dragons game. How old do you think I am?

Here’s the follow up. Why does it matter exactly how old I am? Because I may not be acting my age? Because I need to ‘grow up?’ Because my post-secondary education might be maturing me too fast? Who decides what is too old for something or too young? If it is agreed that we are all adults after 25 then why do we count after that? The answer is we don’t need to.

We are conditioned to think that ‘X’ years of age equals ‘Y’ in life events. Yet most of our parents and grandparents who had those life events and socially determined what we are expected to accomplish are the first ones to now tell you that ages 21 to 25 are too early to get married. Until the ’50s, 16 was considered old to get married, and people didn’t often live past 60.

I’m done counting. I will not tell anyone else my age. I have removed it from all my social media and will simply not let it impact me any more. If apps or websites that are not legal documents require an age I will input how old I feel I am.

After all, you are only as old as you feel.

COLUMN | SOCIAL STIRRUPS: Daaaamn Daniel! Are you getting paid to advertise for Vans?

0

Social Stirrups — Analyzing our online social world is a web-exclusive column, in which Kendra Nelson delves into the hidden meanings of our online social media world.  Read more of this column here. And check back soon for more bi-weekly content!


 

[dropcap]O[/dropcap]h the glorious trends that come to us via social media! The only place where a catchphrase can catch fire faster than your tinder match. Damn Daniel happens to be one of the latest viral video trends, in which a young gent named Daniel is hilariously mocked for his fashion choices — in particular, his white vans.

Along with the video going viral, the demand for white vans spiked a bid on eBay for an astounding 11k. That’s more dollars than followers most of us can get on our instagram accounts. It’s clear that not only does social media have the ability to entertain, but it also has the capacity to start fashion trends, encourage social movements, and drive sales in a more accurate and profound way than ever before.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 3.26.01 PM

That being said, it’s becoming ever more difficult to distinguish between what is advertising and what is entertainment. Netflix, for instance, is able to provide its subscription service at a lower cost than cable due to the product placement within its programming. You can’t skip an ad if it is included in your show; which is precisely what this viral video does.

People “create both the content that draws them to the site and detailed information about their tastes, behaviour, and patterns of social relations,” which is essentially labour that enables companies to pinpoint their advertising, as relayed by Mark Andrejevic, in his text The 21st Century Telescreen.

Assuming that ‘Damn Daniel’ isn’t staged — it wouldn’t be the first time we’ve been duped by a viral video, such as the harlem shake, which was picked up by countless companies as part of their marketing schemes — Damn Daniel is just another example of people ‘working for free.’

When clips go viral and gain the status of Internet meme, they are capable of grasping the world’s attention, even if it doesn’t last for very long. The immediate effects are staggering, and in this particular case, the effects are free advertising for Vans. What more could a company ask for?

Here we see the Vans Twitter account giving @josholzz and @daniel_laraa the thumbs up, as they both saved the company potentially millions of dollars in advertising costs when their content blew up on all social media networks.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 3.26.12 PM

 

Spoiler Alert!

If you haven’t seen any new workaholics close your eyes!

Even comedic mainstream shows are offering their commentary on the way we relate to social media and the advertising therein. Workaholics recently poked fun at the social dynamics that social media can create, influencing the quip trio to turn against each other. Each was given a specific image of themselves to project online in order to build their ‘brands.’

Once they had each garnered a following it was their duty to sell their followers haphazard items. Moral of the story: social media tears friends apart. Just kidding, but seriously, if comedy is making fun of it, we know its effects are a big part of our society.

Overall, it appears our online personas are becoming larger than life. Our realities have become warped inside this online world. We all know that instagram is basically a Sears wish list catalogue specially tailored to our interests, so why do we keep up with the charade? Apparently it all comes down to us not minding being bought and sold, as long as we are entertained in the meantime.

P.S. Shout out to the unnamed SFU artist depicting their rendition of the ‘Damn Daniel’ trend close to residence on campus. Exceptional talent!

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 3.26.40 PM

 

A guide to living in Metro Vancouver

0

Ever felt like your current home is not quite where your heart is? Or maybe just need a change of scenery? The Peak’s got your back. We went around asking SFU students about why they love where they live.

After talking to folks from across the Metro Vancouver area, we’ve drawn up a map that serves as the essential field guide for any home-hunter. Every city has a distinct personality, hopefully this guide helps you decide which one best suits your needs, interests, and lifestyle.

Click the red pins to learn about the different areas of Metro Vancouver.
[mappress mapid=”1″]

Editor-in-Chief Election 2016/17

0

Hello, everyone! Below are the candidates’ platforms for The Peak‘s Editor-in-Chief election for the 2016/17 year.

Audio files:

Listen to Tamara Connor’s speech HERE

Listen to Max Hill’s speech HERE

Questions and Answer period for both candidates HERE

Platforms:

TAMARA CONNOR:

A bit about me:

  • Contributor since Spring 2014
  • Collective Rep on the board of directors since July 2015
  • Features editor since January 2016
  • Lots of experience in leadership roles
  • Driven, ambitious, and has an undying love for this paper

Beliefs:

  • The Peak is a great paper, that doesn’t mean it can’t be better.
  • Everyone involved with The Peak is passionate and talented
  • The EIC should be a leader, not a boss
  • Ultimately the section editors and the contributors are the most important parts of this paper, the EIC needs to serve them well

Commitments:

  • Web:
    • Doing a massive design change on the website
    • Increase web security (this has been a big issue in the past, and with respect to my web-first attitude, having better security is super important)
    • Explore new plug-ins on WordPress to diversify content and make pieces more engaging
    • Add 2 new editorial positions that are both only concerned with web-only content
    • Have a vision meeting with the Multimedia team to talk about how to make the section as strong as possible
    • Add a photo section to web where the photo editor can create online galleries for his/her photos
  • Contributor integration
    • Continue to address exclusivity in the office
    • Bring contributors into the editing process
    • Encourage more contributors to participate in the post-mort meetings
  • Take risks
    • Change up the layout, the logo, page 3, EVs…
  • Brainstorming new ways of going about deciding the story going on cover
    • Since cover has been an ongoing issue, I’d like to see us try some new way of pitching cover that doesn’t exclude contributors but that gives Photos/Production enough time to plan it
  • Print
    • Look into getting more stands around campus
    • Smaller papers, more diverse layout
  • Make inter-office communication a priority
    • Making sure illustrators understand what we need them to produce
    • Giving strong concept to Photos/Production but letting them have some creative freedom
    • Keeping contributors in the loop
    • Making sure all editors are on the same page
    • Dedicating small amounts of time to talk about vision/concerns/questions on a weekly basis

Vision:

  • Smaller print papers that have more engaging layouts
  • More outreach to other group on campus, work in tandem with them on events
  • Grow our social media game
  • Create interesting, hard-hitting, SFU-centric content

My obstacles to overcome:

  • Learn to forgive myself for small mistakes
  • Trust my coworkers more
  • Learn more about HTML
  • Learn more about what it means to lead a newsroom

Fun fact about me:

  • I enjoy investigating fan/conspiracy theories about obscure and forgotten television programs (also the Denver airport).

_____________________________

MAX HILL:

Hey everyone! My name’s Max and I’m the current Editor-in-Chief of The Peak. I’m running for a second term in my position, and I’m really excited to continue the incredible work that we’ve been doing at the paper for the past year. For those of you who may have missed my speech on Wednesday, I wanted to provide a little more information on my platform as well as my qualifications for the role. If you have any other questions or want to get in touch with me at all, email me at [email protected]!

A bit about me

I’ve been at the paper for three years now, and I’ve worn a lot of different hats in that time. I edited the features section for a year and also served as the paper’s copy editor and proofreader for a semester each. For the past year I’ve been EIC, which has been an incredibly rewarding learning experience. Having been with The Peak for so long has given me a lot of institutional and on-the-job experience that I believe makes me the best candidate for the role. I’ve spent a lot of time both as a contributor and an editor, so I can empathize with the experience of both contributors and staff members. I also just really love what I do and look forward to working with all of you for another year.

What I want to continue

This past year has been a hugely important one for The Peak, and I think we’ve already seen a lot of signs of the changes that so many people are fighting for. We’ve become much more focused on web, and I want to continue pushing for more quick, web-friendly stories while transitioning the paper towards a focus on more investigative, analytical stories with diverse layouts and a wealth of illustration and photo content. We’ve also written more stories that address the interests of SFU students, covering campus celebrities, ongoing trends on campus, and issues affecting students directly. We’ve expanded our web and print reach, and our website just had its best year ever. We’ve had faster, more streamlined production days and had most of our staff out by midnight every night. We’ve become a lot more welcoming to contributors and made the office more comfortable for editors, which I’m really proud of. All of these are trends I hope to continue in my next term as EIC.

What I want to introduce

I also have a lot of new plans that I think can improve the paper as well as the experience of our contributors and editors. I want to build a comprehensive employee handbook with information for new editors and contributors that we can build together collaboratively. I want to find a way to involve contributors more directly with the creation of the paper and the decisions that we make, and to offer more constructive feedback. I’m hoping to work with our production team to redesign the paper and update our image (we haven’t changed our logo in over a decade — it’s time to shake things up). I want to focus more on shortening papers and maintaining a workable balance for our design team and editorial team. I want to include more opportunities for us to spend time together and discuss our hopes for the paper as well as our broader motivations and future goals. I also think we can improve our social media presence and pull examples from other papers in order to best address the interests of our readership. Other ideas include bringing in guest speakers, moving more paper stands into the UniverCity area and to Surrey, turning around news stories more quickly, introducing a bursary for graduate students, and fostering stronger inter-paper relationships.

What I want to address

As much as I’m proud of all the amazing work we’ve done in the past year, I recognize that changes need to be made. I want to foster a more open and transparent work environment where people feel comfortable voicing their opinions and concerns — this also means listening to and respecting the ideas and opinions of both our editors and our contributors. It also means making sure we treat one another with respect and compassion. I want to work on being a more calm and professional presence in the office, and to let mistakes happen so that we can learn from them. I want to be more comfortable trying new things and pushing boundaries. I want to better mediate workplace conflicts and make sure that everyone feels like they have the space and support to do their job. I want to make sure our editor and collective meetings are streamlined and that meetings only address issues that concern everyone — this means more small meetings during the week, where we can work together to plan content and resolve issues.

That’s it!

There’s a lot more that I personally want to do, and I also really look forward to hearing all of your ideas of how we can make the paper better, too. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me if you have ideas of your own or have any questions for me. I really look forward to continuing at The Peak for another year — this really is the best job ever, and I’m lucky to be able to do something I love that gives me so much fulfilment with so many talented people.

NHL Trade Deadline winners and losers

0
Dan Hamhuis was not traded at the deadline, much to the disappointment of Canucks fans.

The 2016 Trade Deadline lived up to its name this year: it was absolutely dead. With only 19 trades and 37 players moved, this was one of the quietest trade deadlines of all time. Let’s not be mistaken — the week prior to the deadline was filled with moves that saw several teams evidently bulking up their rosters for a deep playoff run and others rebuilding for the future. Let’s take a look at this year’s deadlines winners and losers.

Winners

In contention for another cup run, the Chicago Blackhawks made the biggest splash in the market prior to the Monday deadline, acquiring Andrew Ladd. Shockingly, after not having been offered a contract extension, the former captain of the Winnipeg Jets was quickly snatched up by the Blackhawks. The Maple Ridge native is no stranger to the Windy City; Ladd was a former Blackhawk himself, winning the stanley cup with them in 2010.

Being first in the Atlantic Division wasn’t enough for Florida Panthers General Manager Dale Tallon. He went out and picked up a veteran forward in Jiri Hudler from Calgary, Teddy Purcell from the Edmonton, and Detroit defenceman Jakub Kindl. These additions reinforce their position as a serious threat in the Atlantic division.

Another notable winner this trade deadline were the New York Rangers. Their acquisition of winger Eric Staal from the Hurricanes was one of the biggest trades the past week. This trade unites Eric with brother Marc, but also brings an experienced professional with a Stanley Cup under his belt, to a team that already has the potential of reaching the cup finals.

Losers

This year’s losers were a couple teams who were unable to deal their big players who were on the trading block. Those teams are the Tampa Bay Lightning and the Vancouver Canucks.

In a season where the playoffs are seemingly out of reach, the Vancouver Canucks were unable to flip the two expiring contracts on forward Radim Vrbata and defenceman Dan Hamhuis. These were hot commodities at this year’s deadline. Therefore the Canucks pass another season without acquiring any future assets to aid this young developing team, making them big losers at the deadline.

The other notable loser at this year’s trade deadline are the Tampa Bay Lightning. GM Steve Yzerman couldn’t find a deal to move Jonathan Drouin, and so the youngster remains a member of the Lightning. All of this after he requested a trade six weeks ago, and has been sitting out of the Lightning lineup ever since. This makes the Lightning the biggest losers on the trade deadline.

Ultimately, the 2016 trade deadline will be remembered as a quiet one. It was a trade deadline in which the deals that never fell through made bigger headlines than the ones that did.

Tom McCarthy masterfully negotiates a challenging story

0
Best Picture winner Spotlight is a must see.

The critically acclaimed film Spotlight seamlessly delivers a very important story based on true events and demands the attention of the world. It revisits the scandal and cover-up of child molestation within the Catholic Archdiocese of Boston and the Pulitzer Prize winning investigation that the Boston Globe conducted in 2002.

Without watching the movie, it is very easy to assume the worst of it. The movie poster is of a messy table with bland looking people sitting around it, there are quite a few big names in the cast, and the story deals with an intense situation. There’s much that could go wrong, but let me assure you that it is more than worthwhile: I would even say that it’s a must-watch-before-you-die movie. I’m not the only one who thinks Spotlight is rave-worthy — being a movie that was released on November 6th of 2015, it received 6 Oscar nominations and won Best Original Screenplay and Best Picture.

Director and writer Tom McCarthy did an exceptional job at telling the story just as it needed to be told: with respect, honesty, and passion. Most Catholics, like myself, have probably heard of the scandal at one point or another especially during the time it was being uncovered, but have not fully dedicated a moment to really process the tragedy at hand. For that very reason it is particularly important for Catholics, but also for anyone else, to watch this movie and recognize that this kind of institutional corruption is possible so to avoid a similar situation in the future.

It is clear and proclaimed that the movie had no agenda of slandering the Catholic Church nor swaying viewer’s religious paths. The movie’s simplicity proves this. The setting was sensible, and the film’s only dramatics were the ones in the cast’s human reactions.

To further argue that the movie is a fair depiction of true events, I point out that as the characters go deeper into the investigation they realize that it is not only the Archdiocese at fault, but also the legal system and the press. It was the ignorance and silence of the press during this time which buried the story so deep that The Boston Globe’s investigative journalism team was almost unable to cover it.

The motive of the movie is made clear: to delicately unveil the truth of the scandal and to provide a justifiable and public tribute for the victims whose stories were suppressed for so long.

Through the amazing directing done by Tom McCarthy, this based-on-a-true-story movie was everything it had to be and more. Although it was dialogue-heavy, every word carried a tense weight and didn’t go purposeless. The humanity and normality displayed in the movie through the Spotlight reporters as they uncover facts and testimonies is what I believe will really illicit the strong emotions within viewers. “Spotlight” also draws attention to long-form investigative journalism at its finest.

This is an informative movie that demonstrates masterful grace in storytelling and cinematography. Everybody needs to see it: the story of the sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church is more than what it initially appeared to be. It deserves copious amounts of attention and conversation.

Don’t preorder video games

0

“Sorry, we’re out of stock. They probably will be everywhere.”

So the cashier at EB Games told me last weekend when I went to pick up my copy of the new Fire Emblem. And she was right. Two Best Buys and one London Drugs later, I returned home empty-handed. I get it — it’s a popular game, we’ve been waiting for the localisation for a whole year, etc. Still, it stung not to be able to own a copy on release day.

Of course, I could have just pre-ordered it. But here’s the thing: pre-ordering games is the worst. And I’ll tell you why.

For those not in the know, pre-ordering games is the practice of shelling out around 10 bucks in advance to somewhere like EB or Best Buy in exchange for a reserved copy of an upcoming title. Said reserved copies often come with extra content or trinkets as a reward for players willing to pay a little extra to the developers, publishers, and retailers. Your favourite game companies get more pocket change, and you get your game as soon as it’s released. Sounds good, right?

Yeah, no. There’s a reason that pre-ordering games has gone from being a popular trend to essentially the law of the land in the past five years, and it has very little to do with your own benefit as a player and a whole hell of a lot to do with how much money everyone else stands to make. Retailers regularly rake in millions of dollars on pre-orders every year, and revenue from pre-ordered games rose by 24 percent between 2014 and 2015. In turn, more and more publishers are choosing to offer pre-orders, despite the downsides.

And boy, are there downsides. For starters, pre-orders essentially lock in release dates for titles: if you’ve promised customers they’ll be getting game X at date Y, you’d better believe they will raise a fuss if you don’t deliver. The problem is that sometimes, release dates need to be pushed back. Games are super tough to make, and if development teams aren’t given enough time to iron out the kinks, you end up with sloppy, buggy games. And this happens all the time. In the past year alone, Just Cause 3, Fallout 4, Batman: Arkham Knight, and The Witcher 3 have all been the subject of rushed, glitch-full launches.

As Nintendo mastermind Shigeru Miyamoto once said, “A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad.”

Even more nasty than buggy launches, though, is how pre-ordering eliminates the value of video game reviews from players and professionals alike. The ubiquity of pre-orders has gradually made game demos a thing of the past, meaning that you probably won’t have a sense of whether or not a game is actually worth playing until reviewers get their hands on a test copy. Usually, these are sent out only a few weeks before the official release, long after hundreds of thousands of pre-orders have been placed.

So what if the game you’ve promised to buy is actually, you know, not so great? Well, tough luck. Unless you’re buying via online distributor Steam, who recently revamped their refund policy, you’re stuck with the title you paid for months ago. Imagine if comic book fans had prepaid for tickets to the new Fantastic Four movie before the terrible reviews started coming out. They’d be pretty pissed, right? And yet this is still the status quo among most publishers.

How do we fight back, you ask? Well, there’s really only one way — we need to stop pre-ordering, full stop. Plenty of writers have been urging gamers to break the habit for years, and yet more and more are choosing to pre-order, whether it be for convenience or a (mostly false) sense of security. And I can see the appeal: it would’ve been nice to know that a copy of Fire Emblem were waiting for me at EB Games, without having to risk it on release day.

But ultimately, this is bigger than us. If we want our games to be good, or at least finished, we need to make a change.


Want to know what games could have benefited from being released later?

Here are five famous games that could have benefited from some extra time with the developers.

Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness (2003)

The latest Tomb Raider title has spelled
rejuvenation for the series, but for a time many thought one of gaming’s oldest and most profitable titles would never recover from the utter failure of Angel of Darkness. Featuring laughable graphics and some downright terrifying glitches, this game is a perfectly example of a mainstream franchise getting lazy and complacent. The result is pretty regrettable.

Sonic the Hedgehog (2006)

Unlike the Tomb Raider series, Sonic the Hedgehog never really recovered from Sonic the Hedgehog. Like, I’m not kidding — this is one of the worst games ever. The levels are incoherent, the controls are terrible, and even the game’s story is ill advised. (Sonic falls in love with a human woman. Yeah.) This was the moment wherein Sonic went from respectable old-school series to permanent laughingstock.

Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 5 (2015)

There may be no better modern example of why pre-ordering is the worst than THPS5. Like, how did this game even get released? It’s more than just broken — it’s not even finished. Characters regularly morph through walls or simply lose all control of their limbs mid-jump. For fans of the original Pro Skater games for the PS2, this game is heartbreaking. For everyone else, it’s literally unplayable.

 

CENTRE STAGE: In review: Winners and Losers, Trevor Noah at JFL Northwest, and dance at Chutzpah!

0
Trevor Noah is hilarious and just plain adorable.

Winners and Losers

Feb 16–27; The Cultch

This show has been gaining plenty of critical acclaim, from being nominated for a 2015 Governor General’s Literary Award to rave reviews from critics, but it didn’t work for me. While there were many interesting concepts discussed through a capitalist lens, I felt like I was essentially eavesdropping on an interesting conversation between two friends.

I’ll admit that the conversation was at times engaging, funny, and entertaining, but there were also an equal number of moments when I wondered what the point was. Based on conversations between the performers, Marcus Youssef and James Long, the show situated the two at opposite ends of a long table, a bell in front of each, while they debated whether something was a winner or a loser in the face of capitalism.

They discussed Mexico, Canada, microwaves, Pamela Anderson, their own parents, and each other. As the topics of discussion became more personal, their conversation became heated. They were brutally honest with each other — as any true friend should be — and they shared anecdotes from their childhoods while struggling to reconcile their economic backgrounds.

After throwing arguments at each other for a while, the show abruptly ended. “I think we’re done,” said Youssef. “Until tomorrow night,” replied Long.


 

Trevor Noah

JFL Northwest

Feb 19; Queen Elizabeth Theatre

Trevor Noah made his first stand up appearance in Vancouver for the JFL Northwest festival and entertained a sold-out, appreciative crowd. We laughed until our faces hurt, and reveled in Noah’s cultural commentary.

Noah casually took the stage and soaked up the love from a cheering audience. This being his first time in Vancouver, he shared his observations that “Vancouver is a lot more Asian than I expected,” and that, “it’s like bizarro America: everything seems the same, but people are polite.”

Before the show, Noah took a walk around the city and described his hunt for the best poutine and his perspective on Chinatown. He said that if he were to be dropped off there, he would just assume he was in China and not think that perhaps a few blocks away he would be in Vancouver — there are no Chinatowns in South Africa, he explained. 

The hilarious cultural comparisons and gestural acting continued with his assessment of communications between drivers on the road. In America, he said, everyone honks all the time and it’s impossible to know what they are trying to say, whereas in South Africa, they hoot and this sound can be modified to suit many purposes. His story of getting tacos for the first time was capped off with a wonderful miscommunication in which napkin was taken to mean diaper, as it does in South Africa.

Noah now knows that there could never be a black James Bond thanks to a visit to Scotland, where there are no black people, and he made his case for a Russian accent being the scariest of any accent. These kinds of observational stories about race, nationality and cultural differences, acted out and described with wonderful pacing and humility are what gives Noah his trademark likable style.

I love Noah’s brand of humour, which doesn’t rely on tired clichés. He is able to tell lengthy stories without losing the audience’s attention, and he has the respect of his fans. Everyone in the Queen Elizabeth Theatre left the show laughing, and I hope Noah is able to return soon to do it all over again.


Shay Kuebler Radical System Art: Telemetry Vol. 1 and MADBOOTS DANCE: (SAD BOYS)

Chutzpah! Festival

Feb 20 – 22; Norman and Annette Rothstein Theatre

The first version of his full-length project being developed over two years, Telemetry Vol. 1 is a beautiful piece of choreography mixing swing, bebop jazz, house and contemporary dance and music styles and incorporating Danny Nielsen’s stunning tap mastery. The choreography seems to have an air of maturity about it, and this may be Kuebler’s best work yet.  

The show began with Neilson tapping across the back of a dark stage, as lights were activated based on the intensity of his tapping. This was an impressive effect, and Neilson was then joined by Kuebler and five others who moved surreptitiously across a dimly lit stage, a single light swinging back and forth to show us bits and pieces of their movements.

The group moved in a flowing unison, reacting to each other and always anticipating their next move. They ebbed and flowed around the stage as Neilson continued his tapping, his rhythms complimenting their trademark Kuebler movement style.

Neilson was spotlighted a couple of times; coming to the front of the stage to show off his footwork, and then later, on set off to one side as the other dancers riffed off of his moves. I also enjoyed an emotionally charged duet between Kuebler and Lexi Vajda that showed off a new side to Kuebler’s work I hadn’t seen before.

The second half of the double bill was an all-male troupe from New York, MADBOOTS DANCE, performing (SAD BOYS). Four dancers in tight pants and strange harnesses around their shoulders presented a rather aggressive, bold work that seemed to be a portrayal of what it feels like to be gay and be ridiculed by words such as “faggot,” “beast,” and “sissy” (these were all projected onto the stage). As the piece went on, they moved through a few phases, some emotional and contemplative, others urgent and angry.

A pile of sand at stage right served an unknown purpose, and the meaning behind the quasi-nudity at the end with one of the dancers covering his penis with only his hand was also lost on me. I’m not sure that I understood the message these dancers were trying to convey, but the piece presented some bold choreography that did elicit feelings of concern and uneasiness. Perhaps that was what they were going for.   


 

Coming Up: Vancouver International Dance Festival

The 16th annual VIDF will be presented at various venues around the city from February 28 to March 19 and includes world premieres from Vancouver’s Company 605 and EDAM, a Canadian premiere and co-production by Sweden’s Memory Wax and Cuba’s Danza Teatro Retazos, along with performances by Quebec’s Compagnie Virginie Brunelle and Japan’s Natsu Nakajima. Always presenting a variety of dance styles ranging from butoh to hip hop, the festival is sure to have something for everyone’s tastes. There are even some free performances taking place in the SFU Woodward’s atrium, so be sure to check them out.

Vancouver Whitecaps Season Preview

0
Blas Perez, seen here in action with Panama, was acquired from FC Dallas over the offseason.

As the NHL season begins to wind down and the hopes of any Canadian teams making the playoffs continues to dwindle, it’s the perfect time to look forward to new possibilities. March 6 marks the beginning of a new season in Major League Soccer, which means that the Vancouver Whitecaps will return to BC Place in hopes of building off of last year’s successes.

This will be the Whitecaps’ sixth season in MLS play and the team has grown better with every passing year. Many people aren’t even aware of the soccer culture in the city, but with an average of over 20,000 fans per game and a record 11 sellouts last season, the Whitecaps have a higher attendance than the Vancouver Canucks and fall just shy of the BC Lions.

Supporter culture surrounding the team is at an all-time high with Curva Collective, Rain City Brigade, and the Southsiders all having record membership numbers. During the final game of last year’s playoffs against Portland, a number of fans marched down the street to the stadium drumming, singing, waving flags, and lighting flares. The procession was four city blocks long, and while the Caps lost the game and were knocked out of the playoffs, it hinted that the best was yet to come.

The new season brings new promise, with the core of team remaining intact and many players being resigned to multi-year contracts. As for new additions, coach Carl Robinson has looked to build his front line and bolster the team’s scoring, which was limited at times last season. Masato Kudo was brought over from Japan where he was the all-time leading goal scorer for Kashiwa Reysol of the J1 League. Also joining the team is Christian Bolanos, a Costa Rican who has played over 60 international matches and appeared in two FIFA World Cups.

Finally, striker Blas Perez was obtained from FC Dallas. Perez, who was always a thorn in the side of the Whitecaps, will hope to transfer his skill of scoring goals against Vancouver to scoring for Vancouver. He is tied for third in goals scored against the Whitecaps since they joined the MLS. Over the last couple seasons, the Whitecaps have put a strong focus on building their team from within, dedicating a lot of time and resources into their residency program and lower division affiliate Whitecaps FC II.

New additions and residency players will play a huge roll in the coming season as the depth of the team will be put to the test through three competitions, The Voyageurs Canada Cup, CONCACAF Champions League, and regular season MLS play. Last season the Whitecaps were knocked out of the Champions League in the group stage, however it was clear that focus was being put on the team’s playoff positioning and Canada Cup.

This year might tell a different story as the Caps will have more team depth to fully commit across all competitions. As for the Canada Cup, Vancouver enters the tournament as the top seed after having won the competition last year with a 2–0 victory over Montreal in the final game. Ironically, it will be Montreal against whom the Whitecaps will open their season on March 6. With the team that is being assembled, this season is looking to be something special.