Home Blog Page 796

NEW MUSIC FRIDAY

0

By: Sarah Finley, Courtney Miller, Anahi Silva Palomec, and Jessica Whitesel

Follow The Peak on Spotify to stay up to date on New Music Friday.

“Setting Fires” – The Chainsmokers feat. XYLØ

Jessica Whitesel: Bless the Chainsmokers for going beyond “#Selfie,” but damn them for making basically the same song over, and over, and over. It’s a little much now. Maybe one day I’ll rank all of their samey-sounding songs in order from worst to best, but based on what my sleep-deprived brain remembers of the rest of their music this one is going to be pretty close to worst.

Anahi Silva Palomec: I can’t say these lyrics will be winning the next Nobel Prize for Literature, but the beat is a good substitute for coffee when trying to drag yourself out of bed at 7 a.m.

Sarah Finley: I mean … they tried. They really did. This song is just too boring; it sounds like they took a Tumblr text post, “Set on fire to keep you warm,” and then auto-tuned the shit out of it. I’ll pass.

Courtney Miller: When it started I was like, this is probably going to be something I dislike. But funnily enough, I kind of dig it. It’s the kind of synth-heavy pop you need to be in the mood for, but the vocals, beat, and track are all pretty solid. It made my work much more entertaining, but it’s nothing new.

“Highway Vagabond” – Miranda Lambert

JW: Well, it sure is country, but in like a lyrically old-timey way. It’s nice that it has nothing to do with breaking up, drinking beer, having sex in a pickup truck (directly), or America being the greatest place ever. That being said, I’ll never listen to it again if I can avoid it because it wasn’t that good.

ASP: Because Lambert fits into the country genre and the song still has nothing to do with back porches and breakups in Texas, I commend her. However, the song still rings as repetitive and drawn out far too long.

SF: If you’ve been thinking to yourself lately, “I really want to listen to my wanderlust angst being verbalized with a dramatized Southern drawl,” this is the track for you. These lyrics admittedly are right up my alley —- wanting to drop everything in favor of a road trip — but I’d rather listen to Mac DeMarco or Stu Larsen sing them tbh.

CM: The vocals have a weird echoey thing happening that I don’t like. It makes it hard to understand the lyrics, but there’s still enough twang in the mush to know it’s country. It’s like it was recorded underwater almost. I actually quite like Miranda Lambert, I’m just not feeling this song. The intro guitar bit was solid though.

“Peace Trail” – Neil Young

JW: The first rule of listening to Neil Young is to not think about what he looks like. Seriously, he looks a little axe murderer-y. The second rule is to appreciate that he’s been making some pretty similar music for well over 40 years, but still manages to make it feel fresh in a classic rock kind of way. While this isn’t his strongest track ever — it just feels a little unbalanced, like it’s live but clearly isn’t — it’s still not too bad either, so that’s a bonus.

ASP: Despite his name, the Canadian singer is really old and being able to still turn out some good music is impressive. Young’s new track delivers soft-spoken vocals and a powerful message: “If I believe in someone, I have to believe in myself.” A nice contrast to 2016’s favourite themes of booties and money.

SF: This is the perfect track for sadly staring out a bus window on a rainy day. Gentle and soft, complete with quiet shakers in the background, this will be making you nostalgic over all those memories that up until now you’d been so successful at suppressing.

CM: The best way to describe it is that it’s Neil Young. Kinda folksy, a little bluesy, strained vocals that don’t do much for me. I also feel like it’s a little long and that there were plenty of musical breaks in the middle of the song that did not have to be as long as they were. Long songs are good if they’re long with reason. This wasn’t. Even so, props for still kicking after several decades.

“Burn Break Crash” – Aanysa feat. Snakehips

JW: OK, 2005 was only 11 years ago, people, and it wasn’t that great tbh, so for the love of all that is good in this world, stop trying to bring it back. This song is about three members short of a DC4-era Destiny’s Child non-single. It’s kind of terrible. So in the words of the song: “All I wanna do is burn, break, crash, and explode” this song.

ASP: This starts out really well with some cool beat sampling (it could be some glass sounds), but it immediately goes downhill. If I had to choose between listening to this song again for another 30 seconds or reliving midterms, I’d definitely choose midterms.

SF: Suddenly I am transported back to the cafeteria of my middle school, surrounded by sweaty 12-year-olds trying to dance with each other under a half-broken disco ball. When can we move away from songs about how captivating dudes are? I’m tired.

CM: The high-ish tempo makes the optimism pour out of this song. “I’ve tried, but I can’t hate you” sums it up pretty well. It’s not a great song, it’s not a very different song, but it’s still catchy and fun, and I like it despite not liking a lot of other similar tunes. Lyrics could use some work, though, for sure.

“Versace on the Floor” – Bruno Mars

JW: Bruno Mars started wearing track suits and chains and turned into your creepy uncle. This song is the embodiment of that. Also it sounds like the ’90s, and not in a good way. I can picture so many things happening in my head right now and I’ve managed to simultaneously make myself sad and realize there are a lot of ’90s music videos swirling in the darkest corners of my mind. The ’90s were a dark and strange time.

ASP: Whoa, where are the mullets, because this song takes you back to a time when the music was abnormally slow and ways too dramatic. The ballad has the melodic influence of Boyz II Men, with a hint of Lionel Richie. Turn back, Bruno, before it’s too late.  

SF: I’ve admittedly never been a Bruno Mars person (I was that one in your friend group who took it personally that for the Super Bowl, the halftime show was advertised as Bruno Mars featuring Beyoncé — excuse me?). This is just a whole new level of tacky-bad-romance with Bruno staying at the edge of his vocal range for the entirety of the song. Make it stop.

CM: Mars is back with his smooth vocals. I personally don’t know anyone with Versace who would just toss it on the floor, not even for sex, so it’s one of those unrealistic songs about sex. The creep factor is definitely there, too. Don’t add it to your getting busy playlist.

“Måste va en dröm” – Christoffer Gustafsson

JW: I’ve listened to a lot of Swedish music since starting New Music Friday. Normally I like it because it’s different, not just linguistically but also musically. So when this song started playing I immediately felt like it should have been on the soundtrack for Life as a House, a movie from 2001 that I now realize I only watched multiple times because it had Hayden Christensen in it. Oh, 15-year-old me you were a mess. Just like this song.

ASP: I love that this piece highlights the simplicity of the guitar and percussion instrumentals. The relaxed mood makes for a really great downtime listen.

SF: Gentle vocals with lyrics in a different language — the perfect song to casually show off to that new bae you’ve been trying to impress, not-so-subtly hinting that you’re cultured AF. In all honesty, the instrumentals are beautifully arranged and this track as a whole is perfectly calming.

CM: It starts off musically introspective and reflective with a twinge of sadness, and stays that way consistently throughout the four minutes. It’s not mind-numbingly slow — it’s just on the border of what an acceptable tempo for a sleepy-time playlist. The vocals are calming, even if there’s only one lyric in English.

“Faith” – Stevie Wonder feat. Ariana Grande

JW: I can see every choir and a capella group singing this from now to Lord knows when. That’s not a good thing. What makes choir and a capella interesting is changing up arrangements of well-known songs to make them unique. This one is just a few people short of already being there, and honestly don’t half-ass two things — whole-ass one thing. Either be a choir or don’t.

ASP: You can never go wrong with Stevie Wonder and usually I can’t stand Ariana Grande, but their voices entwine harmonically in this piece without overpowering one another. This song is kind of exhausting to listen to though, so I wouldn’t prescribe more than one listen.

SF: Stevie Wonder and Ariana Grande is a duo I never would’ve imagined in my wildest dreams, but honestly they make it work. Upbeat enough to motivate you right before you run a marathon, I can only imagine what a live performance of this would look like.

CM: The rhythm in this is top notch. It’s fun, the vocals are classy, and the melody works really well. I don’t know what the lyrics are yet, but I want to sing along and just groove around. Approved.

“Elegy” – Leif Vollebekk

JW: Not going to lie, this sounds kind of like a bluesier James Bay that’s singing some sort of mediocre poem. Lyrically it’s meh, vocally it could be going places, and musically it sounds like a looped track made in GarageBand. I’d be willing to try to listen to more of his music, but if it sounds like this I’m going to be so disappointed about the wasted potential.

ASP: This track feels less like a song and more like a short, sad story set to music. It transports the listener through Vollebekk’s experiences with the descriptive lyrics. I’m just not sure if I want to be transported there.

SF: Sad romantic lyrics sung over slow piano and rim hits on a snare make this track the perfect addition to your heartbreak playlist. I’m a sucker for sad songs, and this is no exception.

CM: This starts off super mournful, and then the percussion slides in and lifts everything up just enough to make it sound more nostalgic than melancholic. It’s a little bluesy and his voice is bluesy too, although you can hear the folk in it. If you’re feeling a little sad, but not completely down in the dumps, this is your tune.

“Oceans” – Leo Stannard

JW: Oceans are cool because they have sharks, octopuses, and all kinds of other amazing life forms. Also there’s the crashing of waves, the salt spray, and something that makes you feel alive blowing through the air. This song has none of that and could be described, at best, as meh.

ASP: The repetition in this song works to Stannard’s advantage. It reinforces the feeling of idleness and emotional immobility, while also taking a rather overused beat and making it sound almost fresh.

SF: Stannard’s unique voice makes this mildly angsty track significantly better than your typical angsty track. Stannard’s angstiness and my own seem to align, so perhaps that’s why I like this track so much, but if you’re a uni student feeling claustrophobically trapped on all sides by midterms, stress, and shitty weather, this may be the track for you, too.  

CM: If you were going to create a photo montage with brief breaks of funny video of you and your friends at the beach one summer with that old-timey camera filter, this would be the song you picked for at least part of your soundtrack. For whatever reason, I can see Taylor Swift doing that kind of video to this song. Take that how you like.

“Ghosting” – Rykka

JW: I want to ghost on this song. It’s alright, but it’s been done so many times before and it’s been done better. This is like the off-brand love child of Taylor Swift, Carly Rae Jepsen, and the Chainsmokers. I stuck it out to the end but, like, I don’t get paid enough to have to put up with that kind of shit on a regular basis.

ASP: I can only hear “we’re ghosting” so many times before buying this CD just so I can set it on fire. The only good thing about the song was the imitation of a Stranger Things-sounding intro. Sadly, that only lasted a whole six seconds of the song.

SF: Gh-gh-gh-gh-ghosting. Muted instrumentals in the distance combined with an impressively limited vocal range, I could barely make it through this entire track. Don’t waste your time.

CM: I like the flow of the lyrics, the melody, and the vocals. The track is fine, it’s dynamic enough not to bore me unacceptably. Rykka uses “ghosting” in a new way: “We’re ghosting away to paradise.” But overall the song is just kind of average.

“Find Me” (Radio Edit) – Sigma feat. Birdy

JW: This is a pretty cinematic song. I feel like there should be someone running across a field or something like that. But it sort of is a mishmash and sounds like a sanitized Disney-ified Florence and the Machine, with some weird EDM effects thrown in because why the fuck not? It’s 2016 and nothing makes sense anyways. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

ASP: Birdy’s voice has the same haunting tone as that of Lana Del Rey, but the song can’t seem to decide what to focus on. It jumps between some weird and overpowering EDM beat to her voice. I’ll get back to it when it decides to be less disjointed.

SF: Damn, the sad tracks on this playlist are hitting me hard. Birdy’s voice is the kind that makes you cry over relationship woes you’ve never even experienced. The opposite of Rykka, Birdy’s vocal range made me feel all the things that I was not necessarily prepared to feel.

CM: This song starts off purposefully slow, and by the time it ends, it’s gone through such a good buildup that I can’t help liking it. The vocal range is impressive and the power is nice. It’s not my usual style, but it’s enjoyable.

“The Drugs” – Mother Mother

JW: I mean, while the message is kind of nice, “You’re better than the drugs I used to love,” it’s also kind of very super problematic. DON’T be addicted to a person, it can be just as destructive as drugs. Also musically it’s repetitive, boring, Franz Ferdinand-esque 2004 alt-rock. Pass.

ASP: This song creates a cohesive melody, lyrics, and tone blend. Checkmark for that. Maybe it is because the song is formulaic in its soundscape so they didn’t have to work that hard to come up with the melody. A little tired.

SF: Pro tip to anyone out there who dates men: if any boy who’s too attractive for his own good ever says some shit like “you’re better than the drugs I used to love,” run away and don’t look back. His fake poetic ass won’t be worth sticking around for. I promise.

CM: Classic Mother Mother vocals blends with Ryan Guldemond’s slightly skewed voice, combining with the cleaner vocals from Guldemond’s sister, Molly, and Jasmin Parkin. It’s a great alt-rock tune and stays true to what fans of Mother Mother have loved about them since the beginning. But yeah, lyrically the sentiment is problematic.

Student society blues: corruption in student governments is too rampant to ignore

0

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he Connected slate thought they were in for summer lovin’ when they took over the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) office space this past May. But soon, it turned out that their first semester in office would be one filled with summertime sadness, as president Deepak Sharma resigned less than six weeks into his year mandate.

This story was hot on the tails of the news that the Highland Pub would be closed all summer due to a deficit. Now cue the start of this Fall semester: athletes and students are told there will be no stadium built, despite the overwhelming approval of the project in the 2015 Annual General Meeting.

The SFSS Board of Directors have had no honeymoon period with the student populace, and with the byelection right around the corner, a lot of students are left asking themselves how we as a student body got here.

As long as I’ve been a student at SFU, I can recall some scandal involving the SFSS. From the alleged physical altercation between two elected members, to speculations that the Build SFU campaign was withholding information, to now running half their board meetings behind closed doors, the SFSS can’t stay out of trouble.

I like a lot of SFU students, I assume found all the scandals tiresome and disenfranchising. I just wanted the disputes to end and for someone to address my concerns with the U-Pass program, student fees, and resources available to me; but I found myself waiting for the SFSS president that never came. I have in recent semesters, however, come to believe this isn’t inherently the fault of the SFSS. Rather, the responsibility landed on me: the student and the voter.

I’ll admit it: I didn’t vote in the elections my first two years as a student here. The first year I voted, I did minimal research, and attended no debates. This, of course, didn’t stop me from being frustrated with my student government. I was part of the reason why subpar, underqualified, and uninspiring candidates were being elected to positions of power.

I’ll never be able to go back in time and vote for a president who doesn’t make a ridiculous Disney reference every other sentence, but I can try and encourage all of my fellow students to take an interest in the election, even if it is a byelection for a student president. Comparatively, the SFSS has been a passable student union. Below are some examples of what happens when students don’t get to know their candidates, and accidently elect sadness.

Mount Royal University (MRU)

In 2012, a former student union president robbed a bank shortly after resigning from her position. Meghan Darcy Melnyk reportedly walked into a local credit union in Calgary, and gave a note to a bank teller asking for an undisclosed amount of money, further suggesting she was in possession of a weapon. Melnyk was caught and processed, but left in her wake a shocked student population.

Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU)

When people think of 2005, they think frosted tips, flared jeans, and Gwen Stefani’s problematic hit, “Hollaback Girl.” Unless of course you were a KPU student at that time, in which case all you can think about is how you were allegedly robbed by the student society representing you. As The Ubyssey reported, the student union ended up suing five of its former executive members for allegedly mishandling millions of dollars in student fees.

It all started when Aaron Takhar was appointed the head of the student union. Soon after becoming chairperson, changes in bylaws came flooding in. In a Special General Meeting (SGM), the student association presented a 200-page document to be voted on. With special prize giveaways at the SGM, like tropical vacations, students probably didn’t much care what was on those 200 pages. Some of these changes, of course, were questionable in nature: during Takhar’s reign, executive directors saw a salary increase of 130 percent, democratically elected councillors lost their positions, and others had their mandate doubled.

After Takhar finished his rule as chairman, he did not rerun. The former councillors who were expelled after the SGM, however, found themselves back in office. They committed themselves to auditing the society’s recent activity. What the audit revealed was shocking. The Ubyssey reported “nearly $150,000 of student funds had been paid out without supporting documents. This included $67,000 paid to a consulting firm called AST Ventures, which Aaron Takhar later confirmed to Maclean’s that he was the sole director of upon incorporation.”

The audit also alleged election manipulation and missing financial documents, but these allegations have not yet been proven in court. Takhar moved forward by transferring to SFU in 2006.

University of Regina (U of R)

While serving as VP of finance on the University of Regina Students’ Union (URSU), Haanim Nur admitted that she misused funds at students’ expense. At that same time, Nur reportedly held a position with the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS), and neither association was keen to confirm that the stolen funds were theirs to claim. Nevertheless, Nur was was under investigation from the CFS for forging cheques that totalled $700.

During this investigation, however, Nur continued her candidacy for URSU president, and was triumphantly elected by the student population despite the ongoing investigation into the missing funds.

Taste of playoffs bittersweet for women’s soccer with first-round exit

0
Emma Pringle won the program's second straight Freshman of the Year, and will likely be one of the building blocks for the future.

Win or lose, SFU’s women’s soccer team had already made history. In the team’s first-ever playoff appearance in it’s National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) era, the Clan was the underdog against a Western Washington team that was ranked first nationally and had been undefeated in the regular season.

For the team, it wasn’t good enough just to make the playoffs — even if they were faced with the toughest matchup in Division II women’s soccer.

“One of our goals this year was to make the Great Northwest Athletic Conference [GNAC] [playoffs], but for us it was something that we assumed we could reach — it wasn’t an unattainable goal,” said assistant coach Anna Picarelli. “Going further in the playoffs was our bigger goal.

“A lot of people expected us to come in this game with the mentality of nothing to lose, but for us, [our mindset] was to come out and show them that we’re more than [that] — we’re somebody who wants to compete,” she continued. “I think the girls showed that. It was unfortunate what the scoreline was, but I don’t think that was the tale of the game.”

In the end, SFU fell 3–0 to the team whose only blemish all regular season was a 0–0 tie. Western Washington held possession for much of the game, and was just too fast. The team gave up few chances, and had some deadly opportunities that could have made the score greater than 3–0 were it not for SFU goalkeeper Priya Sandhu.

Despite this, SFU held on for much of the first half. Western Washington was awarded numerous free kick opportunities, but Sandhu kept the door shut. The Clan’s best chance of the half came about 10 minutes in, when Monpreet Heer set up Katelyn Erhardsen with a scoring opportunity to give them the lead, but Erhardsen’s shot went just wide.

Western Washington finally got on the board with 13:56 left in the half. It turned out to be all they needed, but in the second half, the Vikings shored up their lead with two goals scored within 1:17 of each other.

“A lot of people expected us to come in this game with the mentality of nothing to lose”

SFU put up some solid chances in the last part of the game, but was ultimately shut out. Sandhu made eight saves in the game.

Though the first-round playoff loss on home field stings, the women’s team has made some clear progress. The second consecutive year that SFU’s home field played host to the GNAC Championship, it was the first time in NCAA history that the team has made the playoffs, having fallen just one win short last season.

When head coach Annie Hamel took over in 2014, she inherited a team that in its previous three seasons had only four wins combined. After her first season where the team went 2–16, SFU put up consecutive winning records. And now they’ve had a taste of playoff action.

“It’s one step forward for the program, and hopefully next year we take one more,” said Picarelli.

Now comes the time to put in the work to take that next step.

“The offseason, that’s our favourite time of year,” explained Picarelli. “It’s our time to actually give the girls proper training and hours on the ball. When you’re in season, it’s one day of training and then a recovery day, then a game, and it’s really hard to actually be able to teach.”

With two consecutive Freshman of the Year awards, recruiting has been a strong spot for the team. With some solid additions, this SFU core could certainly take that next step in the coming season.

While the game’s result was a heartbreaker, the future is bright for this young team.

Saying goodbye to the closet

0

[dropcap]O[/dropcap]n October 11, 1987, Washington, DC was filled with roughly half a million protesters rallying for LGBT rights. AIDS was rampant, and at the time had taken the lives of countless people, while the Reagan administration failed to even acknowledge the crisis, let alone adequately address the situation.

Just a year earlier, the Supreme Court had upheld Georgia’s sodomy law that declared oral and anal sex a criminal offence, arguing that “the Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.”

People were fed up, and expressed their frustration in a week of rallies that culminated in the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights. The march was a huge success, with the AIDS Memorial Quilt being publicly displayed for the first time; a civil disobedience act at the Supreme Court following a few days after; and many new organizations on the local and national levels being established, such as BiNet USA or the National Latina/o Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Organization.

Finally, in 1988, National Coming Out Day was brought into being, in order to commemorate “The Great March” and celebrate queer and trans people’s visibility.

Flash forward almost three decades later, and coming out is still a big deal. My experience has been that when two or more queer people are getting to know each other, chances are pretty high that someone will throw in the question “So, what’s your coming out story?”

Coming out is usually not a one-time thing: you’ll have to do it over and over again, as long as our heteronormative society still just assumes that everyone is straight until otherwise specified.

The first time I came out, it was to a woman twice my age with whom I had been infatuated for the past three years. I was 17 and absolutely terrified. Terrified of what she would think, terrified of what my friends would think, terrified I would burn in hell for not being attracted to men, and most of all terrified that my parents would kick me out of the house.

In the beginning, I was dead sure that I would take this secret to my grave. But after a while, I started to think that I would eventually choke on it if I didn’t let it out soon. So I told the person I trusted most at the time that I was madly in love with her — of course, she didn’t reciprocate my feelings, but she was nevertheless flattered and generally made me feel like it was OK; like I wasn’t some weirdo teenager with totally inappropriate feelings. I still highly respect that about her and am so thankful that she made my first coming out such a memorable experience.

Coming out can definitely lift a huge weight off your chest. After that first time, it took me about two more years until I finally got the guts to come out to my Christian, and relatively conservative parents. Thank goodness they had already had a hunch for half a year, which made things a lot easier. Hiding your sexuality takes so much effort and energy, and coming out is the breath of fresh air that so many closeted queers hope for.

At the time, marriage equality was being heavily debated in the US. Whenever the topic would come up in my family, it would require extreme effort to not get too upset and blurt out anything that would blow my heterosexual cover.

Faking interest when friends would talk about guys eventually became exhausting. Hiding my disgust for the idea of marrying a man and settling down and having kids eventually became impossible. Hiding under the covers secretly watching snippets of The L Word on YouTube eventually became suspicious. I desperately needed to ditch the closet for my own sanity. I wanted to be out and be gay and be proud and wave rainbow flags around and go to Pride and kiss girls and not have to worry about what anybody thinks of me.

It took some time. But today, I don’t carefully sit people down anymore to have the typical “I have to tell you something, please still love me” talk. Straight people never have to do that, so I’ve given up on treating my sexuality like it’s something that I have to be ashamed of. If people are uncomfortable with it, that’s their problem and not mine.

Apart from the immense positive effects on your emotional well-being, coming out is also a highly political action. Yes, we have marriage equality in North America. But in some US states, queer and trans people can still legally be discriminated against on the basis of whom they love. In April, the Human Rights Campaign counted 80 active anti-LGBT bills in state governments.

The Pulse shooting in Orlando earlier this year as well as the ridiculous number of murdered trans people reminds us all that violence against queer and trans people is not a thing of the past. Even in Canada, the number of reported hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation was 186 three years ago.

Coming out has the power to reduce homo-, bi-, and transphobia by demonstrating that queer and trans people are human. Denying someone their rights becomes much harder when they become your daughter or son, a family member, a good neighbour, or a cherished friend. Coming out still matters. Expanding LGBT visibility is still as important as ever. National Coming Out Day is a vivid reminder of not only the past and ongoing struggles fought on the personal and political levels, but also the many victories that have been achieved since that historic march in 1987.

Silver linings in late game performance, but it was too little, too late for the Clan

1
Miles Richardson (#8) went 17 for 29 with 104 yards passing.

After going without in the two previous games, SFU football put up an offensive touchdown. It was the most points they put up in four games. In the second half, they were beaten by a score of only 107, and didn’t allow a single point in the fourth quarter.

There were more than a few positives for the Clan Saturday night, but they came too late in the game. SFU lost 479 to Humboldt State Lumberjacks; the 21st straight loss dating back to 2014, and the eighth loss of the season.

Once again, the offence had difficulties moving the ball and putting up points. Even the defence — which for the previous two games was the team’s bright spot — gave up 546 yards. It was the worst game statistically since they gave up 631 yards in a 570 loss to Humboldt State last Halloween.

“Our offence was unable to get on the board early. We had some promising drives snuffed out by errors that have been consistent with what we’ve done all year,” said head coach Kelly Bates. “We are a young team and those early mistakes really make it hard to build any momentum.”

On the first play of the game, quarterback Miles Richardson threw an interception, giving Humboldt State the ball on their own 38-yard line, which led to a touchdown. For the sixth time this season, SFU surrendered a touchdown on the opposing team’s first drive.

Humboldt State’s second touchdown came two drives later as a result of a blocked punt at SFU’s 37-yard line. The Lumberjacks recovered at the 25-yard line, and all they needed was one 25-yard pass to make it 140 (with an extra point kick).

“There’s a building process in place that will take a considerable amount of time if this program is to turn around.”

SFU’s only score in the first half came off of Humboldt’s fifth touchdown in the second quarter. The Clan defence had blocked the Lumberjacks’ extra point kick and defensive back Jaryn Bailey, playing special teams, caught the ball and ran it 98 yards into the Humboldt end zone.

As it was on Humboldt’s extra point kick, it counted as a defensive PAT (point after touchdown), not a touchdown, and was worth only two points.

The Clan went into halftime down 372.

SFU allowed two scores in the first 9:34 of the third quarter — a touchdown and a field goal for 10 points. However, for the remaining 20:26 of the game, SFU didn’t allow a single point and gave up only 75 yards.

Just over five minutes into the fourth quarter, running back Jalen Jana ran 38 yards to put it in the end zone and give SFU a much-awaited offensive touchdown. Offensive touchdowns have been hard to come by for the team, with only seven on the season — three of them credited to Jana.

An interception by Bailey and the Clan stopping a Humboldt fourth down rush attempt on SFU’s 21-yard line — with SFU having pushed back the Lumberjacks from the red zone — kept the rest of quarter scoreless.

At the end of the game, SFU had done some good. However, much of it came in the second half. By then, it was unlikely Humboldt was putting in its best effort, and was probably mostly playing its second- and third-string players — SFU not allowing any points at the end of the third quarter and fourth quarter coincided with when Humboldt put in its backup quarterback.

“When we have success near the end of the game, I understand we’re playing against second string guys — I get that — but we are still building and we have to start somewhere. Those are positives we can build off of,” said Bates.

“There’s a building process in place that will take a considerable amount of time if this program is to turn around, and I think that we are in a predicament right now, because of what’s gone on here the last few years.”

SFU now has two games left in the season. While a win may be difficult to find — considering what the previous eight games have shown — they will somehow have to bring the way they played in the fourth quarter to kickoff.

SATURDAY: The Clan hit the road one last time to face the Central Washington Wildcats in Ellensburg, WA.

SFU fans will remember Central Washington as the team that gave SFU a 55–6 loss at the homecoming game October 1. The Wildcats currently sit second in the Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC), with a 4–2 record in the conference and 5–3 overall.

The Wildcats are coming off of a 44–7 loss on the road to the GNAC leaders, Azusa Pacific. Central Washington is second in the GNAC in both total offence and total defence statistics.

In their previous matchup, SFU was held to 42 rushing yards, and only scored a touchdown late in the fourth quarter.

“I’m always expecting full effort, I think that we’ve always got that, I think that we play extremely hard. The things we need to work at are things to do with playing consistent football, which is knowing your assignments and carrying the load properly on the field. We’re looking for our young kids to grow and get better at that, and that comes with experience,” said Bates.

“It’s been a learning process all year. We’ve done some things to try and make it easier on our young kids that don’t have to know as much and simplifying the game plan, and trying to let our kids to play physical is something we’ve tried to do on both sides of the ball.”

Kickoff is at 1 p.m.

NFL Blitz with Jason Romisher Week 9

0
Matthew Stafford has cut down on the turnover recently, a good sign ahead of their game against the Vikings.

Last Week: 8–4–1

Season: 68–50–2

Byes: Chicago, Washington, Arizona, Houston, Cincinnati, New England

The winning percentage keeps going up with another solid week! The Browns came oh-so-close last week in getting their first win, but were edged 31–28 by the Jets. The big upset of the week turned out to be the Monday nighter, where the Bears knocked off the Vikings in convincing fashion. The best game of the week was the shootout in Atlanta that saw the Falcons score late to beat the Packers in a 33–32 thriller. On to this week’s action.

Atlanta (5–3) at Tampa Bay (3–4), Thursday 5:25 p.m.

Tampa Bay opened the season with a road win at Atlanta. Since then the Bucs have been mediocre and the Falcons have played extremely well, with quality wins over the Raiders on the road and Packers at home. Look for Atlanta to take this one in a game with more turnovers than expected.

Prediction: Falcons 31 Buccaneers 24

Upset Special

Lions (4–4) at Vikings (5–2), Sunday 10 a.m.

Two weeks ago, I thought the Vikings were the NFC favourites with a team that was Super Bowl capable. After scoring only 10 points against a bad Bears defence, that no longer appears to be the case. The Vikings offensive line is struggling to protect Sam Bradford and the defence — which won games earlier in the year with turnovers and touchdowns — has not been as dynamic. I like the Lions in this contest because of how much their quarterback, Matthew Stafford, has decreased his propensity for turnovers. The Lions have more playmakers than the Vikings and if they are able to limit turnovers, they should win a low-scoring game.

Prediction: Lions 19 Vikings 14

Pittsburgh (4–3) at Baltimore (3–4), Sunday 10 a.m.

These arch rivals always play each other in tough, hard-hitting games decided by three points or less. Whenever I think of this matchup, Ray Lewis’ devastating tackle on Rashard Mendenhall, which shattered Mendenhall’s shoulder, comes to mind. This tilt has major playoff implications as the Ravens could pull into a tie for first in the AFC Central division with a win and a Bengals loss. The intrigue in this game also concerns the health of Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger who looks like he will be able to come back earlier than expected from a knee injury. I like a rested Ravens team coming off a bye to edge the Steelers in an emotional slugfest.

Prediction: Ravens 16 Steelers 13

Jets (3–5) at Dolphins (3–4), Sunday 10 a.m.

These divisional rivals have played some very memorable games over the years, highlighted by Dan Marino’s fake spike game winning touchdown and the “Monday Night Miracle” where the Jets overcame a 30–7 fourth quarter deficit to win in overtime 40–37. That game is notable for Arnold Schwarzenegger’s halftime interview where he boldly declared, “Wayne Chrebet is going to pull it off. I think as usual the Jets are going to come from behind, you will see [. . .] I think the Dolphins have to be terminated.” True to form, Chrebet caught a touchdown to tie the game at 30 and later a key reception in overtime which set the Jets up for the game winning field. In this matchup, look for another huge game by Dolphins running back Jay Ajayi, who recently became the fourth player in NFL history with back-to-back 200-yard rushing games.

Prediction: Dolphins 34 Jets 21

Philadelphia (4–3) at New York Giants (4–3), Sunday 10 a.m.

These two divisional rivals also have a long history steeped in tradition. The most memorable moment in the matchup is undoubtedly “The Miracle at the Meadowlands.” When teams take a knee at the end of the game, there’s a player standing behind the offence just in case there is a fumble. This happens because the Giants fumbled in the final seconds of a game in 1978 which saw Eagles defensive Back Herman Edwards scoop up the ball and score the game-winning touchdown. This game will be a tight matchup where the Eagles strong defence will be tasked with stopping an explosive Giants team that is rested off of a bye week. I like the Giants and league number one diva Odell Beckham to prevail in this matchup.

Prediction: Giants 28 Eagles 20

Dallas (6–1) at Cleveland (0–8), Sunday 10 a.m.

This matchup has trap game written all over it. The Cowboys are flying high after a big divisional win last week against the Eagles and go on the road, on grass, to play the laughing stock of the league. The wrinkle is that the Browns have played good tough football this year for new coach Hue Jackson and almost knocked off the Jets last week. They also traded for talented linebacker Jamie Collins from the Patriots who will immediately improve their defence. I have boldly predicted Browns upsets on two occasions this year and cannot predict a third. I grudgingly will side with the favourites in this one.

Prediction: Cowboys 24 Browns 23

New Orleans (3–4) at San Francisco (1–6), Sunday 1:05 p.m.

I do not like the Saints on the road and I like them even less on the road on grass. That being said, the 49ers may be the least talented team in the league. I think the Saints will be a factor in the playoff picture late in the year which makes this game one they simply have to have.

Prediction: Saints 26 49ers 16

Carolina (2–5) at Los Angeles (3–4), Sunday 1:05 p.m.

The Panthers finally got it going last week with a convincing home win against the Cardinals. While I don’t like that they are travelling across the country against a rested Rams team, I do think Panthers quarterback Cam Newton will make enough plays to beat an opponent with serious offensive limitations.

Prediction: Panthers 21 Rams 17

Tennessee (4–4) at San Diego (3–5), Sunday 1:25 p.m.

The Chargers are a playoff-calibre team despite their 3–5 record. The Titans have a strong running game and a very capable quarterback in Marcus Mariota but will not be able to do enough on the road to crest the 500-mark. Rivers and company pull closer into the playoff picture.

Prediction: Chargers 38 Titans 33

Indianapolis (3–5) at Green Bay (4–3), Sunday 1:25 p.m.

My skepticism about Green Bay’s offence and Aaron Rodgers’ play are officially at an end. The Packers roll over a terrible Colts defence at home and make a charge for a division title.

Prediction: Green Bay 41 Indianapolis 29

Game of the Week

Denver (6–2) at Oakland (6–2), Sunday 5:30 p.m.

Two division rivals with equal records, with the winner gaining first place in the division in prime time — you’ve got to love sports! The Raiders won last week in overtime against Tampa Bay despite setting a league record for accepted penalties in a game. They are young, brash, have an excellent quarterback in Derek Carr, and playmakers on both sides of the ball. The Broncos are a veteran team with tons of playoff experience, including a victory in last year’s Super Bowl. They also have a dominant defence and are extremely well-coached and -disciplined, which makes up for their offensive limitations. I was all in on the Raiders until I wrote the above, and reflected upon my own football experiences both playing and coaching on how important discipline, coaching, and experience are to winning.

Prediction: The boring Broncos 27, the sexy Raiders 24  

Buffalo (4–4) at Seattle (4–2–1), Monday 5:30 p.m.   

I’m tempted to express order a Jim Kelly jersey and a pair of zubaz pants to represent Bills fans in Seattle on Monday. Even with the power of the zubaz nation behind them, the Bills will be travelling cross country to face a Seahawks team reeling from a tie and a loss in back-to-back road games. You better believe the Seahawks will be focused and ready to maintain their precarious divisional lead in the NFC West.

Prediction: Seahawks 34 Bills 28

Vincent Van Gogh-and-paint!

0

Hey there, friends. I’m an artist — and you should be one, too.

Now, you may be thinking, “No way, I hate making visual art. Everything I illustrate looks like an uncharismatic potato.” Where’s the issue in that, though? Where did we first come up with the idea that to make art, one has be good at it?

It seems as a society, we only put emphasis on art as a talent, skill, or profession. What we forget is that art is also an enjoyable activity — much like dancing or singing. I sure as shit cannot dance or sing skilfully, but you better fucking believe that I will loudly sing and drunkenly dance to “The Black Parade”  by My Chemical Romance, proclaiming my love for Gerard Way while doing so.

Do you remember elementary school? Art is an activity you used to love! Your mom has all the shitty paintings you made as a kid to prove it. She still has that turkey hand you made in Grade 2, and she loves it dearly.

As kids, we wanted to paint just for the sake of painting. We grew older, and a lot of us forgot why we loved making art so much. In turn, we’ve forgotten the pleasure of expressing our creative selves through art. The attitude we used to have as kids is one we should work to restore.

We stifle our creativity when we worry that our art won’t meet some standard, and we miss out on the joy of creating. I know this from personal experience. For an unfortunately long period of time, I valued art only as a skill I could master, and overlooked its intrinsic value.

Because of this mindset, making art just felt like something that plagued me. I constantly brooded over the smallest mistakes I made in my drawings, which led me to dread illustrating — all my errors stared me in the face, like proof that I’d never be good enough. What was the point?

But after finally realizing that my perspective was fucking ridiculous, I started creating art far more frequently than I did before, and now, doing so was a pleasure. I made art for myself; I selfishly enjoyed creating, and acknowledged my errors without focusing too much on them. When I gave up the idea that my art had to meet any standards, I grew a lot as an artist.

It’s strange that I ever had such an absurdly contradictory view. There are no obligations when making art, no restrictions, and no rules. Why confine ourselves to the idea that we can’t make art, when there is no one way to do so? Creating is a process we all can engage in, and we all should.

The benefits of making visual art are backed by science, too. Studies show that making art can relieve anxiety, distract us from sadness, and increase our stress resilience. Honestly, what do you have to lose?

Get your brushes out and respect the memory of Bob Ross by painting your damn hearts out.

SFU men’s basketball shines against Columbia Bible College with a 96-53 win

0
Former UBC player Kedar Wright (centre) led the team with 20 points.

A slow metamorphosis is operating in SFU men’s basketball team. With several recruits and a new head coach, the 2016–2017 roster can hardly be compared to last year’s squad.

The Clan took over Columbia Bible College for its second exhibition game, with a 96–53 win. UBC transfer Kedar Wright led the team once again with 20 points. Redshirt Junior JJ Pankratz registered 19 points. Pankratz, who is one the few players returning from last year, was named as one of the co-captains of the 2016-2017 team. Freshman Graham Miller registered 15 points in the contest while another one of SFU’s new recruits, Othniel Spence, had 14 points.

As for the Clan hoping to strengthen its roster with new recruits, redshirt freshman Michael Provenzano seemed to have adapted to the team quickly. The point guard had some impressive moments on the court against Douglas College and Columbia Bible College.

It has only been a week since SFU men’s basketball went back on the court, but Former UBC player Kedar Wright already convinced the crowd of his talent through his electric performances. Wright scored the most points in both exhibition games and played a total of 42 minutes combined.

“I think we’re still growing as a team. There are still a lot of things that we need to clean up, which was evident today especially in the first half,” said Wright. “We were a bit messy on the defensive side in the first half. We’re still getting used to play with each other. I think we responded pretty well in the second half and there’s definitely going to be a lot of growth this year [and] I think we did as good job as a team. I’m excited to play again.”

Head Coach Steve Hansen, who was part of the coaching staff last season as an assistant coach, looks forward to learn from last year’s mistakes with his fresh team and get better results.

“I think we need to change the way we start games. They do get the job of running their personal offence, and that’s a very tough game to prepare for, but we just didn’t come out for the challenge in the first half. It was good to see some of the leaders at halftime take over, and we came over with a different attitude in the second half. It was good to see some adversity today.”

Even though the Clan shined for its first two exhibition games — SFU opened its exhibition schedule with a 97–63 win over Douglas College — Coach Hanson is still looking to solidify his new team and put together stronger collective performances while adjusting a new combination of players. Coach Hansen has already showed us what the Clan is capable of with some quality basketball and will be able to rely significantly on seven new talented faces, as well as more experienced players such as seniors Hidde Vos and Gibran Sewani.

The Clan will now take on Quest University in another home game on November 5. The game is scheduled for 7 p.m.

SFU hockey wins 4–2 over UVic

0
Jaret Babych (centre) scored the team's third goal of the night.

In a tight game compared to their last contest, SFU was able to grind out a 4–2 result against the University of Victoria Vikes. The Clan got four goals from four different players, a good sight considering the injuries up front to Adam Callegari, Tyler Basham, Mike Sandor, and Jesse Mysiorek.

“We just have good depth, and the boys are jumping into those opportunities,” said head coach Mark Coletta after the game. “Especially guys that don’t play that much. But I think we have a lot of goal scorers, first, second, third, fourth line — whatever you want to call them, one line more or less, I think they all play well.”

In the first period, SFU got up to a 2–0 lead. Spencer Unger and Mak Barden got the goals, and Lyndon Stanwood in his first start of the season only faced two shots.

However, that quickly changed. UVic roared out in the second period, peppering Stanwood with 15 shots, and adding another nine in the period. BC Intercollegiate Hockey League point leader Shawn Mueller got the goal, while Jaret Babych got one back for the Clan.

“It’s tough, especially if you haven’t played for four weeks in a row in a real game, to come back and you’ve only had two shots, and they weren’t really contested shots at all,” said Stanwood on the increased traffic in the latter two periods. “I was a little bit nervous at first, as you haven’t played in a while. Coming back and easing your way into it was great, I thank my team for that.”

The third period featured a barrage of power plays for UVic, but they weren’t able to truly take advantage. Mueller got his second of the game, but that was not enough as Mitch Crisanti scored an empty-netter to put the game away at 4–2.

One of the keys to the game was limiting the offensive production of Patrick Holland. The ex-NHLer was held to no points on the night.

“Our D did a great job, all six of them,” remarked Coletta on how they limited his chances. “[. . .] So we tried to isolate those things as best we can. [And also], our defence were up with the play. They were tight, [and] our gap starts when we break the puck out. I know you hear that a lot in the NHL level when they talk about gap. We try to bring that to a different level that as soon as we break the puck out we want our D to follow up, so that they’re already in position and that they’re not having to run up.”

“He’s a very good hockey player as you can see out there tonight,” said Stanwood. “But he’s playing in our league too. So we just take him as another player. You just want to do what you do against any other player, and that’s what we did tonight.”

SFU’s next home game won’t be until November 26, where they’ll play four-time defending champions Selkirk College. SFU is now two points off them in the standings, but have two games in hand.

NBA Season Preview: The association returns

0
Russell Westbrook is already off to a hot start, and is a must-watch player this season.

The 2016–17 NBA season is here, with expert predictions that will invariably be wrong, and optimism that is misplaced. Yet, there is something magical about the return of ball season. Here are the four major storylines to follow this upcoming season.

1) Golden State is the best team in the league . . . again.

The Warriors got over the disappointment of being the first team to lose a 3–1 lead in the NBA finals by signing Kevin Durant two weeks later, via free agency. This iteration of the Warriors possesses the past two MVPs of the league in Durant and Stephen Curry. Surrounding them are the second best shooter in the league, Klay Thompson, and the two-year defensive player of the year runner up, the enigmatic Draymond Green. Rolling out a lineup featuring those four players means that this team figures to be the best offensive team — possibly of all time. This season is going to feel a lot like last year’s, when the Warriors won 73 games, because the talent discrepancy between the Warriors and the rest of the league is outlandish.

2)   The Cleveland Cavaliers want to spoil another Warriors party.

Despite being major underdogs in last year’s finals, the Cavs won their first title and Cleveland’s first major sports win in 52 years behind the legendary LeBron James. James solidified his place as best player in the league with a great finals, which saw him averaging 29.7 points, 11.3 rebounds, 8.9 assists, 2.6 steals, and 2.3 blocks per game. With the entire squad returning, the Cavs look set to reach the finals for a third straight season. Kyrie Irving, Kevin Love, and J.R. Smith will look to shoulder some of LeBron’s burden during the regular season. The Cavs’ eyes are again set on the Warriors out west, as they look towards a third straight finals matchup with the Oakland-based team.

3)   This is Russell Westbrook’s world, and we are all living in it.

With Kevin Durant’s departure, Russell Westbrook is now the man in Oklahoma City. Westbrook’s ferocious attacks on NBA defences figure to be a routine fixture now, and this season might be the greatest individual season by a player in the modern era. The Westbrook show will feature athleticism, power, and speed that is unmatched by any point guard in the game today and if he can lead his team to 50 wins there will be a strong narrative for Westbrook as the MVP. Three games into the new season, Westbrook has already had the first 50-point triple-double in the NBA since 1975, and won the Western Conference Player of the Week. Apart from the Warriors, Westbrook is guaranteed entertainment and must-watch TV this season.

4)   The MVP race is wide open.

It is hard to imagine Steph Curry three-peating as the MVP, and even harder to imagine Kevin Durant reclaiming that trophy as a new member of an already championship-level team. With the two splitting votes being on the same team, the MVP debate this season opens up as LeBron James, a four-time MVP, looks to regain the award and players like Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Kawhi Leonard figure to make a push for the honour. Harden in Houston has an offensive genius head coach in Mike D’Antoni figuring to make him an even better player, and Kawhi in San Antonio looks to be the franchise player with the retirement of Tim Duncan. Westbrook, of course, figures to be a one-man wrecking crew for the entire season. Team success invariably plays a role in MVP selection, so in the tradition of making predictions early, I pick the two-time defending Defensive Player of the Year, Kawhi Leonard as my pick for MVP.