Home Blog Page 563

“Your talents were never meant for you to keep hidden”: a preview of SFU’s Got Talent

0
Image courtesy of Dallas Der via SFU Peak Frequency

By: Kitty Cheung, Staff Writer

 

Ever wondered about the creative side of SFU students? Curious about our musical and artistic community?

SFU’s Got Talent will be held this Friday, March 15 from 4:30–7:30 p.m. in the Leslie & Gordon Diamond Family Auditorium. This second annual musical production is hosted by SFU Peak Frequency, a club for student musicians, in collaboration with the SFSS.

The event will feature twenty different acts, spanning musical, artistic, cultural, and more. This year’s show will be MC’ed by Gordon Lai, the former president of Peak Frequency. Students will perform in front of judges and a live audience, competing for the title of the SFU’s Got Talent Winner for 2019. Cash prizes are offered for the first, second, and third places, with a People’s Choice category being voted in online by audience members. $250 is offered for the first-place winner, $100 for the second, and $75 for both the third-place winner and People’s Choice winner. Admission is free.

Marylou Villegas, winner of 2018’s SFU’s Got Talent, finds that “having an outlet like SFU’s Got Talent is so important” in managing student stress. In an email interview with The Peak, Villegas writes, “So many students, like myself, tend to be in and out of campus once classes end. It’s a great chance for you to get your head out of your textbooks and take a well-deserved break for once.”

While some may view SFU as more of a commuter school, fellow vice-president Tony Yu begs to differ. He views events such as SFU’s Got Talent as an opportunity for building community. “It was a delight to see all these different SFU students come to showcase all their various talents,” says Yu on judging auditions for last year’s show. “There’s so many interesting people, so many interesting things that can be going on in this school.”

To future performers who may be hesitant about signing up for next year’s show, the Peak Frequency executives are full of encouragement.

Yu assures that “we’re always happy to showcase various kinds of talents and skills at our show,” to which their club president chimed in to mention that last year’s show even included a roller blading comedy duo, Pulp Friction

“Often times I see people who have incredible amounts of talent, but they have trouble recognizing it,” says club president Jeffrey Leung. “One of the goals of SFU’s Got Talent is to bring that to the surface, to show everyone that there is talent,” Leung says.

“The process from your first audition to the actual performance will entail a variety of emotions,” Villegas writes, “but always remember your talents were never meant for you to keep hidden!”

“This event happens once in a year so don’t miss out on the opportunity to witness what SFU has to offer,” Villegas proclaims to prospective audience members. “Word on the street the acts this year are stepping up their game so make sure to bring your love and your friends for an unforgettable night!”

SFU men’s basketball plays thrilling final game

0
Despite the loss, it was a great season. (Photo courtesy of SFU Athletics)

By: Brandon Braich

On Thursday, March 7, the SFU men’s basketball team made the trip down to Northwest Nazarene University to play the first every postseason game in the program’s history.

SFU (15–14) entered the game as heavy underdogs against the strong NNU (20–7) squad but put up a valiant effort in a thrilling 76–75 loss to the Nighthawks. SFU had already upset the Nighthawks the previous time they played, and on Thursday, they came just seconds away from doing it again.

Lead by Julian Roche (16 points) and Jasdeep Singh (16 points), SFU held the lead with under two minutes to play, but a jumper by Adonis Arms (15 points) gave the Nighthawks a lead they would not surrender.

The first half was a close contest, as the teams traded leads, but with SFU down 27–25 and five minutes left in the half, the Clan went on a run to seize control. Singh started it off, splitting a pair of FT’s followed by a layup by Michael Provenzano to give SFU the lead.

SFU continued to attack the basket aggressively leading to a parade to the line allowing them to to take a 36–31 lead into the half.

Perhaps sensing the upset in progress, SFU came out of the half strong, and a three-pointer by Othniel Spence three minutes into the half gave SFU their largest lead at 52–42. NNU quickly answered with a three of their own, but Spence followed up with a second consecutive three sending the large contingent of SFU supporters to their feet.

The Nighthawks, lead by Nikola Prvulk, went on a run of their own, quickly closing the gap to 55–53 and forcing an SFU timeout. Neither team was able to pull away until a jumper by Jasdeep Singh gave SFU a 69–64 lead with 5:45 left. The Nighthawks recuperated and a FT by Jayden Bezzant tied the game up at 74 with two minutes left in regulation.

Wilfried Balata drew a foul on the next possession down, and after splitting his free throws, SFU held a one-point lead in the final moments. The lead did not last long though, as Arms answered with a jumper to put the Nighthawks back in front.

SFU had several opportunities to make the winning basket, but after Balata missed a desperation three at the buzzer, the Clan finally fell short in their quest to reach the semi-finals.

What’s next:

Despite the loss, SFU wrapped up what perhaps was their best season ever, quickly turning into a team capable of competing with the top countries In the GNAC. With many of their key players expected to return, SFU may be a force to reckon with in the coming season.

 

SFU women’s basketball falls to WWU in GNAC Championships

0
SFU player reaching up with their hand to block an opponent's shot from going in.
SFU stays hot this week racking up victories in basketball, wrestling, and track and field. Image courtesy of SFU Athletics.

By: Brandon Braich

On Thursday, March 7, the SFU women’s basketball team travelled to Western Washington University to take on the Vikings in a quarterfinal match for the GNAC Championships.

In a hard-fought and closely contested game, SFU fell 72–69 to the Vikings, eliminating them from the GNAC playoffs. Lead by Jessica Jones (20 points) SFU was able to stay within striking distance for much of the final quarter, but could not seize the opportunity as Western Washington hung on.

The game got off to an auspicious start with WWU quickly taking a lead 11 seconds into the game with a layup by Anna Schwecke. Schwecke lead the way for the Vikings with a team high 19 points on just ten shots.

But after that, SFU quickly took control, lead by Jones who scored seven consecutive points to give the Clan a 13–10 led. After free throws by Sophie Swant, Jones scored a layup on the fast break giving SFU a 20–12 lead.

SFU fortunes quickly turned in the second, where the Vikings offence began to fire on all cylinders. WWU, who would finish the night shooting 49%, outscored the SFU 24–8 in the second frame, turning an early deficit into a commanding 41–28 lead going into the half. SFU only managed two field goals in the quarter as they fell into a prolonged shooting slump.

SFU head coach Bruce Langford inserted Kendel Sands into the lineup to start the second half and the move paid immediate dividends. After hitting a pair of free throws, Sands hit a three to bring the Clan to within six, shifting momentum. After a Jones three and a layup by Samantha Beauchamp, SFU found themselves in a tie game.

In the final quarter, the Vikings were able to regroup, and began to grow their lead again. A layup by Kelsey Rogers gave WWU a 59–51 lead with just 6:46 to go in the game. SFU continued to stay with striking distance though, and a pair of free throws by Ozioma Nwabuko cut the lead to four with three minutes remaining.

After a three-pointer by Tayler Drynan made it a 69–64 game, SFU was able to get a critical stop giving them possession of the ball with a chance to make it a one possession game. Drynan, feeling it from the previous possession, launched another three but could not connect, forcing SFU to foul in order to prolong the game. WWU was able to hit their free throws, sealing the game and allowing them to advance.

What’s next:

Despite the heartbreaker, SFU’s season may not be over yet. Depending on how things shape out, the SFU women’s team may qualify for the West Region championship continuing their season for at least another game.

A 12-year history of SFSS presidents

0
Image courtesy of the SFSS

By: Natasha Tar, Peak Associate

Editor’s note: This piece was put together with archival sources from The Peak which may not be available on our website. Please feel free to browse previous editions of The Peak on our Issuu profile.

If we at SFU are being super honest with ourselves, most of us don’t really care about what goes on at our campuses as long as our buses are air-conditioned in the summer and heated in the winter.

So when we really do care about something on campus, you know it’s big —  a good example being the impeachment of SFSS president Jaskarn Randhawa during the SFSS’s 2018 annual general meeting (AGM), following a series of allegations. Some of the 300-plus students filling the Diamond Family Auditorium for the AGM had waited for over two hours to get in. The meeting’s original start time was 12:30 p.m., but due to a smoke bomb being detonated in the auditorium, the call to order was at 2:56 p.m.

Regardless of the impeachment’s repercussions in campus life, as the cliché goes, history tends to repeat itself, and Randhawa isn’t the only one who’s had their journey through SFSS presidency cut short. In October 2006, SFSS president Shawn Hunsdale and six other Board members were impeached during a SFSS Special General Meeting. The impeachment of the so-called “Group of 7” was sparked by their alleged abuse of power within the Board.

Hunsdale’s predecessor Clement Apaak stated that the impeached members were responsible for “usurping the power of the board, breaking [their own] by-laws, intimidating other directors opposed to their wishes, ignoring the concerns of students, lying to [students] and hiding behind confidentiality provisions when it [suited] them, disregarding prudent past practices when needed and invoking them when it [suited] them, compromising the private information of students, [and] wasting over $15,000 of [student] fees on lawyers and replacing locks,” among other allegations, including the abrupt removal of seven SFSS staff members.

Despite all this, these two presidents are outliers. In the 12 years separating these impeachments, many other SFSS presidents have served the board and the students of SFU. So who were they and what were their legacies?

 

Jaskarn Randhawa (May 2018–September 2018)

In his candidate response during election, Randhawa expressed that he wanted to continue the board’s long-term projects and increase campus community and social life. He did not have a chance carry out these endeavours.

Notable happening: The SFSS’ annual Fall Kickoff concert was not organized this year due to the Board’s inability to negotiate a date with SFU. The Kickoff was replaced with a joint BBQ with UBC’s Alma Mater Society.

 

Hangue Kim (2017–2018)

At the beginning of his term, Kim stressed that he wanted to build students’ trust in the SFSS as well as increase student services and engagement. In his time, he was successful in securing more space for students at the Surrey campus. Going forward, SFU will now prioritize improving the space and providing project-specific and after-hour rooms for Surrey students, according to a press release. However, rocky negotiations with Rotunda student groups over space in the Student Union Building (SUB) may have affected student trust. He also worked with the Board to move away from Meeting, Event, and Conference Services (MECS) so that students could have more choice when it came to what catering service they used.

Notable happenings: Kim and the Board made important decisions about the SUB’s space distribution during this term. Rotunda groups such as SFPIRG, radio station CJSF, and Embark were not allotted space in the SUB, although it was allegedly promised.

“During the design phase of the SUB, the SFSS suggested that existing campus groups would have a strong case to be made to continue leasing space from the SFSS,” said Kim. “Space was never promised to these groups and no agreements were signed to provide space in the SUB.”

Frustration and space negotiations continue today, most recently with the Rotunda group Students of Caribbean and African Ancestry.

 

Larissa Chen (November 2016–May 2017, and interim president as of June 2016)

When Chen began as interim president in June 2016, she also had to maintain her initial role as vice-president student services. A by-election was held in November and Chen was officially voted into the position of president. She stated that her priority as president was to make strong connections with other board members so they could work effectively as a team.

Notable happenings: Chen and the board decided to end SFSS’s Food and Beverage Services (FBS), which included Highland Pub, the Higher Grounds Coffee Shop, and the Ladle. They cited ongoing deficits as their main reason for shutting the services down. Students were frustrated with the abrupt closure and the SFSS’s lack of transparency.

The Build SFU stadium project was cancelled in August 2016 after coming out to be three times as much as its original cost.

“It’s a difficult decision, but when you think about all the other students in the school in its entirety, you really do comfort yourself saying it is the better decision for all the students,” Chen said. “The onus isn’t on anyone, it’s just that it’s not possible.”

The news angered student athletes, who protested the cancellation at a Board meeting. In March 2017, the stadium was approved (for real) once the project was made more affordable. This January, a final plan with a $15 million price tag was unveiled, meaning that SFU should have a stadium by Summer 2020.   

 

Deepak Sharma (May 2016–June 2016)

Infamous for being asked to step down as president after allegedly not signing up for classes, Sharma had previously been involved with the SFSS in other positions for years. It seems that all his work climbing up through the SFSS was for naught. In his defence, Sharma explained that he thought he had more time to sign up for courses and that his “temporary resignation” became a permanent one because the Board misinterpreted it.

Notable happening: He had the shortest term of any SFSS president in the past 12 years.

 

Enoch Weng (2015–2016)

During his election campaign, Weng donned a tiger onesie, brought out his guitar, and hosted a sing-a-long. These charming antics paid off, as Weng went on to become the SFSS president. In an interview peppered with Disney quotes, Weng outlined his goals for the term, such as restructuring the Board and interacting with and engaging SFU students.

Notable happenings: Weng proposed to hold a spring concert at the Vancouver Playhouse for SFU students that featured YouTube musicians. The proposal, however, was rejected by the rest of the board on the grounds that it didn’t benefit enough SFU students. In March 2016, however, Weng was successful in uniting the musical clubs of SFU for the Music Showcase Extravaganza.

The SFSS also fought to make Surrey campus’ Fraser Library open on Sundays, after many students showed interest in the idea. They were successful. Additionally, they proposed expanding study space at the Harbour Centre campus.

 

Chardaye Bueckert (2014–2015)

Bueckert stressed the importance of returning money to students and making education affordable when she was a presidential candidate. However, there seemed to be some drama when Bueckert was elected. Another presidential candidate, Brandon Chapman, said this when Bueckert won: “You played a very dirty game Chardaye. You didn’t deserve this.” Oh dear.

Notable happenings: During the October 2014 AGM, students voted in favour of building both the SUB and the stadium. However, the meeting’s venue quickly filled to maximum capacity, and not everyone who showed was able to cast their votes on the motions.

Additionally, two opposing suggestions for a Fall event were brought to the table by Board members — a regular Fall Kickoff and another called the Culture Kickoff Fest. Bueckert was surprised at how late the proposals were coming in, while another board member commented that both proposals “really sucked.” In the end, the Fall Kickoff event was given the green light and it boasted a large turnout.

 

Humza Khan (2013–2014)

In 2013, Khan was the only presidential candidate running who had executive experience. The other two candidates missed debates and when one was asked who the current SFSS president was, “he pleaded ignorance,” according to a past Peak article.

Notable happenings: The SFSS as a work environment was called into question during Khan’s presidency, particularly after former external relations officer Meaghan Wilson came forward after a conflict with the president. She said, “I remember that it got to a point where I asked him if he was threatening me, and he responded, ‘yes.’ (…) I remember sitting and just staring at my desk as he continued talking. I was intimidated.” A few other Board members also came forward about internal harassment. Perhaps it isn’t surprising then that at the AGM that year, a student presented a petition requesting that the SFSS create an official anti-harassment and conflict/complaint resolution policy.

 

Lorenz Yeung (2012–2013)

Big on changing policies, Yeung led the Board to clearer language in their bylaws. At the end of his term, he stated that he didn’t focus solely on his year of presidency, but on creating a strong foundation that would support the SFSS for years to come.

Notable happenings: Concerned about the deficits of the SFSS FBS, Yeung and other Board members hired John Flipse as a new manager to oversee the Ladle, Highland Pub, and Higher Grounds. The SFSS hoped that a clearer line of communication with the manager would be beneficial to the FBS.

 

Jeff McCann (2011–2012)

McCann had a controversial term, but made some key decisions for SFU. In his final interview with The Peak as president, McCann stressed the importance of students taking the initiative when it came to being involved with the society: “I never felt like the victim this year. Everyone else tried to say they were the victim, poor us. Well, take some responsibility. You want to be involved? Come be involved. I’m not closing the door on anybody. You want information? Here.”

Notable happenings: The SFSS officially parted ways with the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS) after three years of legal fees and conflict. Student writer Clinton Hallahan explained that the SFSS proposed the split because they were “[o]f the opinion that the CFS had become a bloated, corrupt money-sink.” Students voted 67% in favour of leaving the CFS in 2008.

During his time on Board, McCann pitched the idea of creating a student union building, which is (almost) a reality, seven years later.

According to student writer Sam Reynolds, McCann was nearly impeached for an SFSS staff lockout (for which coverage is unfortunately spotty). However, the lockout eventually resulted in a collective agreement, and McCann was not impeached.

 

Ali Godson (2010–2011)

“University is not only about learning. It’s also about the experience that you have,” said Godson to The Peak after heading the SFSS’s first social event of the semester. Unfortunately, the semester’s second event organized by SFSS club I Vision One World proved a failure, as promised headliner K’naan did not perform and not all students could be refunded. What an experience.

Notable happenings: After the K’naan fiasco, Godson kept a quiet board. One notable happening would be an article written in September 2010 which boasted that students might be able to ride a gondola to Burnaby campus by 2013. Haha.

 

Ada Nadison (2009–2010)

The SFSS changed a few of their election policies before Nadison was elected, including allowing slates again and eliminating paper ballots in favour of online voting. At the beginning of her campaign, Nadison swore she would keep promises and stay honest throughout her term.

Notable happenings: In September 2009, the West Mall Centre Tim Hortons opened, replacing Raven’s Café. These days, SFU is thinking of shutting down the Tims because they don’t provide a Fairtrade option.

The SFSS ran an event that placed 75 pumpkins for carving in Convocation Mall and informed students about the government cutting funding for post-secondary education. The event boasted a large poster that said “Cut Pumpkins Not Student Funding!” and the pumpkins were later used to decorate Highland Pub.

 

Joe Paling (2008–2009)

This one’s a little bit messy and hard to track, to be honest. According to an old Peak article, Paling got married at the Highland Pub (back when it was still open, of course). Yet another Peak article claims that he also “lifted up the shirt of fellow candidate Xenia Menzies to expose her ‘back hair’ in the Highland Pub.” He later apologized in a letter. It seems that this man really had a special connection with that pub.

Notable happenings: Near the end of his presidency, the first SFU Burnaby gondola plans were pitched by the group SFU Community Trust and covered by The Peak in a very optimistic article.

Paling also introduced an extended undergraduate health and dental plan to students, as well as a board game lending service. Additionally, he gave Highland Pub a glow-up so it looked “less like an airport lounge,” according to Paling.

During his term, defederation from the CFS was widely discussed and debated.

 

Derrick Harder (2006–2008)

A former copy editor for The Peak, Harder maintained his presidential position for two consecutive years. During his last year of presidency, Harder and his Board pitched this referendum question to students: “Are you in favour of maintaining membership in the Canadian Federation of Students?” Some students wondered if the CFS would see the results as valid while others called the referendum question “unconstitutional.”

Notable happening:

The SFSS held a student forum that allowed students to debate leaving the CFS. Harder began debate by saying that “the society had ‘outgrown the Federation’” and stressed that the CFS funds, if leaving it were successful, would be redirected to the society.

 

Shawn Hunsdale (May 2006–December 2006)

To many, Hunsdale seemed like the ideal presidential candidate. He had years of experience with the Board and Senate, and was passionate about reducing tuition fees. He advocated for better transit service and supported more student grants. However, after only two months as president, seven SFSS staff members were suddenly fired with no explanation to students. From there, things only went downhill for Hunsdale’s presidency.

Notable happenings:

Peak writer Kevin Tilley wrote, “For years, Hunsdale has not-so-secretly had an agenda of returning the SFSS to the CFS’ [sic] control.” Many students were already critical of the CFS at this point, especially grad students who began planning to disconnect from the SFSS (today they are the Graduate Student Society).

The president before Hunsdale, Clement Apaak, alleged that Hunsdale’s action of sending staff home was against SFSS bylaws and that he tarnished the reputation of the SFSS and cost it thousands of dollars.

In September, students who were unhappy with Hunsdale’s secrecy and actions called for him and other involved Board members to be impeached.

On October 25, 2006, over 1,000 students showed up for the Special General Meeting to impeach Hunsdale and six other Board members. 724 students were in favour of the motion, and the members were impeached. However, the directors believed the meeting was invalid, and took the SFSS to court. In December, the court ruled that the meeting was valid.

 

Conclusion

Our student society has left lasting marks on SFU and our experiences as students. Some things we take for granted, like our longer library hours and extended health plan. Others we remember with unforgiving clarity, such as the most recent impeachment. Reading this article may have reinforced or completely changed the way you look at the SFSS, but we must remember that these people are students like us. We, like them, can make great changes in our student government come about. So if you can, take the time to care more about your student government, so it can perhaps take better care of you.

 

Author’s note: If you want to know more about even older SFSS presidents, check out this article.

Voices of SFU: “What do you want from your next SFSS representatives?”

0
Photo Illustration by Geron Malbas/The Peak (Original photo by Azat Bayandin/The Peak)

Compiled by: Alex Bloom and Gabrielle McLaren

“I would like to see the SFSS focus on more health and wellness resources for students. I think bringing in a dietician/nutritionist to give workshops geared towards student lifestyles and student budgets would go a long way. Workshops with certified fitness instructors would also be great to introduce students to different types of workouts and their benefits!”

Anastasia Kosteckyj, history

~~~~

“The SFSS has taken on a number of important roles on the campus — not the least of which are managing Out on Campus and the Women’s Center – and moving forward, I would like to see greater support being provided to these departments. Out on Campus in particular seemed to suffer from unexpected staffing shortages and was closed twice this past year. I would love to see greater attention being paid to the needs of these departments to make sure they can be consistently beneficial and available for our campus community.”

Amneet Mann, engineering science

~~~~

“The one thing that I need from the next student representatives is advocacy and activism. There are a wealth of issues that directly impact the student experience on campus, and we need a society that can leverage the money and resources we provide them through our student fees to advocate for us. This looks like taking a strong stance on the Tuition Freeze Now campaign, providing space in the new building for marginalized student groups facing eviction, and really listening to and supporting student constituents who are being negatively impacted by past decisions and actions by the university and by the student society itself.”

Emma Warner-Chee, sociology

~~~~

“To not be a hot mess.”

Aiya Bowman, computing science

~~~~

“I think more initiative on helping students with mental health, I think that’s a big issue. [. . .] So I think talking about that more, getting that out more, or just making that more accessible would have a big impact.”

Mohammed Elhagehassan, biomedical physiology and kinesiology

~~~~

“Please be clearer with what you are building and why. Also please push SFU to have a clearer snow day policy. Maybe also fix elections. Like not fix but repair.”

Rylee Sear, history

~~~~

“Would like to see more student engagement; (in addition to the marshmallows), better snow day policies, and perhaps to look into the group Build The SFU Gondola!”

Kalieah Banovac, history

~~~~

“Change the rules about having to pay every semester for the recreational facilities, even when students are only enrolled in distance courses.”

Anne-Marie Belanger, education

~~~~

“I would like to see more raccoons.”

“I would like to see student union / special interest group space in the student union build and more consultation on important decisions like that in the future.”

Paul Choptuik, history

~~~~

“I would like more candidates to actively promote their policies and objectives so that students are better equipped to vote for what they actually believe in.”

“I would like to see more engagement between SSFS and the student population outside election periods, so that the current student population feels genuinely represented by their government.”

Sophie Webb, history

~~~~

“I expect maybe a more active presence from the SFSS, just because I feel like me and a lot of other students don’t really know what they do or what they can do. I’ve seen a lot of promises of tuition freezing and that wasn’t something that I was even aware that they do, so I guess maybe some more publicity, that’s what I would hope for.”

Pablo Clairmont Salvatierra, political science

Procrastination Methods Report

0
Photo curtsey of Public domain pictures

By: Mishaa Khan, Peak Associate

Number 1: Cleaning fiasco   

Materials Needed: Messy room, nachos, cleaning supplies, Netflix account, and clumsy hands

Time Wasted: 2-5 hours

Scenario: Complain about how your messy room doesn’t allow you to be productive, and about how this is why you must clean your room. Now make things more exciting! Start watching a new show on Netflix. Make sure you stop cleaning multiple times when the scene gets interesting. Once you’re hooked on the show, grab some nachos to stress-eat and make sure you get chip grease on your headboard, salsa stains on your sheets, and crumbs everywhere in your room. Now, your room is dirty again. Repeat.

Number 2: YouTube Rabbit Hole

Materials Needed: Computer with functioning internet

Time Wasted: 2-3 hours

Scenario: Watch YouTube videos on how to stop procrastinating so you can get rid of those nasty procrastination habits. After watching 10 videos on the topic, watch a video on how to cook quesadillas to destress. Go down the YouTube rabbit hole and spend hours watching conspiracy theories about how the government is secretly forcing its citizens to go to school only to surgically remove their brains and implant them in robots. After watching these videos, you can feel vindicated in your brave decision to no longer study so your brain remains inside your head.

 

Number 3: The Next Jackson Pollock  

Materials Needed: Be creative!

Time Wasted: 1+ day

Scenario: Art is a wonderful way to destress. You can spend days crafting your masterpiece in the hope that it will make you famous one day since school is not going to get you anywhere. For example, you can paint a five-foot-tall painting, knit the world’s largest blanket, or write a poem about everything wrong with SFU.  

Number 4: Friends who quit school together, stay together

Materials: A friend on the verge of quitting school, passport, and instant noodles

Time Wasted: Eternity

Scenario: You and your friend decide that a poli-sci major is not worth pursuing because you both could learn a lot more about world politics by traveling. You decide to go on a grand adventure exploring touristy places such as the Eiffel Tower in France or the pyramids of Egypt while living on instant noodles. Despite failing your courses, you couldn’t care less because your social media is on fleek and you know how to say five words in French and two in Arabic, which is more than what you would have learned in school.  

 

SFU hockey lose 6–3 in game one of first round playoff series

0
It's do or die for the Clan on Friday night. (Photo courtesy of SFU hockey)

By: Dylan Webb

After a regular season grind that spanned two academic semesters,  24 games, and most of southern British Columbia between Castlegar and Victoria, the SFU hockey team opened the first round of the BCIHL playoffs Thursday night. Playing at the Aldergrove Community Arena against their geographical rival, the Trinity Western University Spartans, the Clan got their first taste of BCIHL playoff hockey in over two years.

The Clan took an early lead with Kyle Bergh’s first goal of the game just under five minutes into the opening frame. Unfortunately for the Clan, their only lead of the game would last approximately thirty seconds as the Spartans responded almost immediately to tie the game. Adding two more tallies in the second half of the first period, the Spartans opened up a two-goal lead on goals from Jacob Mills and Dylan Sakatch that they would not relinquish for the remainder of the contest.

In the second, frustration mounted for the Clan as the Spartans struck almost immediately following the opening faceoff to expand their lead to three. While Bergh added his second of the game just one minute after the Spartans fourth goal, the Clan were unable to muster further offensive production and would allow another goal against late in the frame to effectively put the contest out of reach heading into the third.

In the final frame, Bergh completed his hat-trick by netting his third of the game on a Clan powerplay. While Bergh’s standout offensive performance certainly comprised one of his best games of the season on an individual level, multiple defensive breakdowns and scrambled zone play by the team as a whole prevented the Clan from closing the gap. The final score, a 6–3 win for the Spartans, means the Clan will now head back to the Bill Copeland Sports Centre for what now shapes up to be a must win game two of the series if the Clan hopes to extend their BCIHL season beyond Friday night.

In goal, Michael Lenko, BCIHL co-player of the month for February/March started the series opener and took the loss while making 35 saves on 41 shots. Lenko looks to be in line for the start in game two as his solid performance in the opener appears to have instilled enough confidence in head coach Mark Coletta to warrant back to back starts for the rookie netminder.  

Discussing the factors that contributed to a less than stellar performance as a whole on behalf of the Clan, backup goaltender Ryan Sandrin noted that the team “struggled to maintain intensity throughout the entire 60 minutes.” Further to this, he felt the Clan’s struggles with “team discipline and defensive zone structure” were significant factors in the series opening loss.

What’s next:

With their potential elimination from the BCIHL playoffs looming, the Clan now turns their attention to their final home game of the 2019/2019 season with the hope that a friendly crowd will give them a much-needed boost in support of their effort to stave off elimination. If the Clan are unable to secure a win, their season will end Friday night on home ice in disappointing fashion and the Spartans will move on to face the winner of the Selkirk/VIU series for the league championship. If the Clan are able to secure a win in their final game on home ice this season, the series will shift to a decisive game three back at the Aldergrove Community Arena on Saturday night.

Given the nature of the BCIHL playoff structure and the Clan’s fourth-place finish in the regular season, even if the Clan do secure a win Friday night and then take the series from the Spartans on Saturday, the Clan would play every remaining game on the road on their path to the BCIHL championship. As Ryan Sandrin, Darnel St. Pierre, Jaret Babych, Graham Smerek, Brendan Lamont and captain Mathew Berry-Lamontagna suit up for their final appearance in Clan red at the Bill Copeland Sports Centre, the team will look to put together a more complete performance that will, at the very least, prolong the BCIHL careers of these Clan veterans by one more game.

Construction in the AQ and Convocation Mall to be completed in Fall 2020

2
Photo Courtesy of Chris Ho

SFU Burnaby is undergoing a Plaza Renewal Project. The Peak sat down for an interview with the project manager, James Bremner, to find out more about the ongoing construction.

Bremner explained that there are two phases of the project, both of which are well underway. Phase 1 involves the construction going on in the AQ, and is expected to be finished by late November 2019. Phase 2 includes the construction in Convocation Mall, the fountain square, and the transportation centre, and is expected to be done by October 2020.

Bremner noted that in the meantime, convocation ceremonies will not be disturbed. The area that is currently being worked on in front of the stage in the Convocation Mall will be completed in early June before convocation.

While the stage will still be under construction, the contractors will install temporary tiles on the stage to allow convocation to occur as normal. The full stage will be re done and completed for October convocation.

Bremner explained that the project will beautify the space, including getting rid of old furnishings and fixing cracks in the tiles. According to Bremner, the project aims to show “a sense of the importance that the place has, the Convocation Mall and AQ are very significant to SFU [ . . . ] this is the spine of the campus.”

In addition to creating a nicer space on campus, Bremner explained that this project is very much necessary from a practical perspective. The project will replace waterproofing, replace outdoor paving, upgrade stairway and ramp finishings, and improve drainage, according to documents that Bremner shared with The Peak.

In terms of accessibility, Bremner said they have a gate located in the Convocation Mall manned where students with accessibility needs can be escorted through by a contractor.

He noted that they have worked with the Centre for Accessible Learning and with Student Central to make sure that the signage is adequate and that students are aware of these pathways.

According to an SFU News report that addresses noise complaints, they have “adjusted the times for [noisy activities] to outside of peak study, lecture, and office hours.”

Bremner elaborated on this to The Peak, explaining that they have adjusted construction schedules so that the noisy work, including concrete chipping and drilling, is completed outside the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 10 p.m. Additionally, they are aware of exam schedules and will be sure to not make noise during that time.

When the project is done, “there is going to be a lot more opportunities for seating, planting, a lot more space where students can potentially go and enjoy the plaza [ . . . ] previously there was [sic] a flat, barren surface,” said Bremner. He added that it will be a better space to host meetings and events.

The renovation is designed to have a 50-year lifespan. “The benefit is not just for people using it today and tomorrow, it’s going to be the students that aren’t even born and alive yet that are coming here,” said Bremner.

“I think it’s a really good project for the campus and I’m really excited about seeing it come to fruition finally at the end of next year.”

Staying In: Samurai Champloo

0
Image courtesy of The Insiter

Best for: History nerds, philosophy fanatics, and pretty much anyone who likes comedy and anime

By: Maxwell Gawlick, Peak Associate

 

Samurai Champloo is the perfect Saturday-night-till-Sunday-morning show. With a mix of intense action, beautiful storytelling, and gorgeous animation, it’s a fantastic choice for both new and long-time anime lovers. The animation is smooth, exciting, and engaging, and the art style is beautiful and impactful. While it’s a work of art, it’s also hilarious — with tongue-in-cheek dialogue and physical humour, it’s sure to get a laugh.

Even though the anime is set in Edo-period Japan, the music and dialogue suggest a modern tone. Samurai Champloo follows Mugen and Jin, two swordsmen opposite in nature, and the ex-waitress, Fuu, to whom they are indebted. Though episodic, Samurai Champloo maintains an overarching, mysterious storyline revolving around Fuu’s quest to find the “samurai who smells of sunflowers.” The episodes are set in historical Edo Japan, but their subject matter isn’t set strictly to the time period. They touch on many important social issues tastefully, exploring war, racism, sexism, and poverty. Aside from history, the show balances intrigue, humour, and of course, action. No matter what genres you like, Samurai Champloo has something to offer.

Between its beautiful art and well-crafted story, Samurai Champloo’s 26 episodes will surely leave you pondering.

 

Samurai Champloo is available on Crunchyroll, Funimation, and Amazon Prime Video.

International Women’s Day compilation : Unfortunate encounters where men could have done better

0
Illustration by Alice Zhang

By: Hannah Davies, Lily Fontaine, Gabrielle McLaren, Natasha Tar, Lauren Wallace, Winona Young

Luckily, I’ve been mansplained to relatively few times. While I do obviously find it mildly insulting and quite frustrating despite trying not to let it get to me too much, the feeling I most prevalently experience is disappointment.

Regardless of the man’s intention, I am disappointed that they would assume that I did not already know about the thing they are “educating” me on, disappointed that they would not take the time to learn what I already know about the subject, and disappointed that this is still something that happens to women today.

I define my experiences as being relatively few, as my criteria for being mansplained to are the following: (1) perpetrator speaks over me and (2) explanation is unsolicited. I sometimes even apply this third criteria: (3) perpetrator explaining something to me that a woman such as myself would likely have experienced or at least know about (birth control, periods).

So speaking of unsolicited advice, as a woman who goes to the gym I have experienced what I like to call “surprise tips.” Someone, usually a man, approaches to comment on my form or a way that I could do the exercise better. Maybe they think they are helping, but I am a personal trainer, and am quite confident in my form for most exercises. I do not want a stranger approaching me to “fix” what I am doing.

So strangers, please let me enjoy my music and workout on my own! Thank you! – HD

 

If as many men were experts on women’s bodies as the number of men who act like it, I’d never have an issue with my uterus again. The world would be full of gynecologists, schools would teach more comprehensive sex education, straight women everywhere would have regular orgasms, tampons would be tax free, and maybe my birth control wouldn’t have made me attempt to jump off a bridge when I was still a teen. But unfortunately, that’s not been my experience.

Instead, men who are decidedly not experts tell women about how lady parts should taste like peaches and honey, how we can’t conceive unless the body “really wants it,” and how tampons are considered a “luxury item” but Viagra is not. And if I argue with them, I’m not a woman who has experience with my uterus, I’m “some crazy bitch” who is “PMSing.”

To put this in context, I’m going to tell you about my ninth-grade math teacher. I tried to explain to him, in class, on multiple occasions, why I had to leave early, as I often threw up during cramps, passed out, or couldn’t stand. He thought I was faking being sick. He often called me out in class for almost nodding off, while I was actually partially fainting in his classes due to my anemia and my super enthusiastic uterus. He decided I was just a “problem kid.”

I just started going home on days when it got that bad, not wanting to have attention drawn to myself while I was unwell. He wrote me up, twice, for skipping class. Then he called my house phone, irate, telling my parents what a terrible child their daughter was.

It took the combination of my mom, a nurse, a note from other teachers and a comment from the principal for this guy to stop harassing me while we figured out what combination of medication and supplements would keep me from being bedridden. Yet to this man, I was “obviously faking it.”

Because a I couldn’t be believed as a girl. I wasn’t a good enough expert as a girl. – LW

 

A professor once split our seminar class up into reading groups to divide her 400-level history seminar’s reading list, which are known for being killer. Basically meant that you read one (1) scholarly article well instead of half-assing four, went to class, discussed the text in a small group, and then taught it to the rest of the class. This was amazing, except for the two dudes in my group.

One of them barely showed up to class and never did the readings, but he was at least honest about it. This other guy in our group also never did the readings or even took notes in seminar, but cluttered our discussions with random information he had picked up in other classes or wherever to try and stay relevant. Instead of, you know, doing any kind of work or sitting back and listening to what the women of the group were saying. Presumably, he also liked the sound of his own voice because nobody else enjoyed hearing about Irish sheep raising traditions while we were really supposed to be talking about North American health history.

It got especially insulting when he started poaching our ideas and sharing them with the class as his own. One week, I expressed how one Historical Event X seemed to have strong political motivations despite our article presenting it as an economic event, only to have him cut in ten minutes later, telling me that he thought that my point was wrong since I needed to remember that “this had a political motivation as well as economic.”

If looks could kill, we wouldn’t have had to bring this behaviour to the prof’s attention twice before confronting him ourselves, thus prompting him to vanish five weeks before the end of term, never to be seen again. – GM

 

An SFU Security guard once mansplained what crime was to me, and surprise surprise, didn’t actually help me.

So when I was in second year, I accidentally left around $50 I’d withdrawn in the AQ’s CIBC ATM in the machine. When I realized this, I called security and a female security guard told me to call security once I got back to the ATM. When I ran back to get it, a girl told me that some guy in a red jacket went to that machine after I left. Now I wasn’t sure if it qualified as theft but the previous female guard assured me that they would help. So I called security back up again, but a new male guard picked up, and I told him the story.

Once I finished, he essentially did the verbal equivalent of scoffing and said, “That’s not how crime works, sweetie.” He went on a solid two-minute speech of explaining Canadian crime and law, and when I tried to ask any questions or correct him, he would keep on going like he didn’t hear me. I repeated that I was asking if he could possibly do anything to help me, to which he said, “We can’t just shake up every person in the AQ with a red jacket and look through their bag, that’s not how it works.”

I knew that! I told him I didn’t expect him to do that at all, at this point feeling equal parts frustrated and humiliated for how he spoke to me. By the end of the call, he asked for my information again while I was trying to not let my voice crack from all the silent crying I did. If I had the chance ever again to either lose $50 or speak to that SFU security guard again, I’d rather lose the money. – WY

 

In my memory, I’ve never been officially mansplained to. Whether that’s by good luck or because I’ve only associated with fairly decent men, I’m not sure. But dear lord, if one thing has happened to me at SFU, that’s being professor-splained. Specifically, I’ve been frequently professors-plained to about trigger warnings.

Let me take you back a few semesters to an English class I was taking. A big theme of the class was trauma caused through colonialism, and in one book, the protagonist has crippling flashbacks of a war he was in. Near the end of the same book, there’s an unexpected and extremely graphic rape scene. I was very disturbed by the scene’s four excruciating pages, and knew that several of my friends would have been severely harmed by reading these passages.

I wondered why the professor had not mentioned that the book had a scene like this. There was so much potential there to retraumatize someone in the class, and I was worried for my classmates.

But when I brought it up to the professor in a reading response, instead of talking to me personally, she brought the subject of trigger warnings up in class. Overall, she explained to us that in the real world, there are no trigger warnings, you need to be strong to survive in this harsh world, and that she guessed she would have to give us a “trigger warning” (yes, she used air quotes) concerning the next book we were going to read.

The next semester, I experienced something similar, this time with a male professor. I don’t feel the need to go into details, because it was a carbon copy of what I described above.

What I’m trying to say is that while men have long been above women in terms of power, and so have professors over their students. I will perhaps wrongly assume that neither of my aforementioned professors have gone through serious trauma, and I will also assume that at least some students at SFU have had traumatizing experiences in their lives.

For professors to use their power to explain away trauma they haven’t experienced is totally wrong. A PhD doesn’t make you an expert on everything, but I guess some professors have yet to figure that out. – NT

 

This is my magnum opus: I could finish my degree right now and get into any job or school with this story. Basically, a student who I’ve seen disrespect and interrupt female professors and students for two semesters in a row now was talking while I was sharing something with the class. And not just quickly whispering something to a neighbour: talking. Having a full-on conversation with the person next to him, loud enough for all of us to hear.

So I stopped talking mid-sentence, turned my head to face him, and waited. I’ve worked with five-year-olds, and have used this strategy multiple times. The entire class stayed quiet while I stared at him until he realised in a moment of self-awareness that it had gone quiet. He turned back and saw all of us staring at him, and started saying “Oh, I was just saying how…” And I interrupted him saying, “Cool. You can wait until I’m done talking.”

Let me tell you: when I read that boy, my skin cleared, my metabolism sped up, my spine uncurled, and my depression was basically cured. I stared him down until he apologized, too. It was a good moment.

The point I was making was far from the most relevant thing to be said in class, but that’s besides the point. Disrespect shouldn’t be respected in class. I highly recommend calling out this kind of behaviour, it reestablishes the validity of your place in the classroom, and denormalizes these kinds of behaviours. – LF