Home Blog Page 449

Friends beg their friend-turned-Twitter-activist to let them live ignorantly in peace

0
Courtesy of Marten Bjork via Unsplash

Written by Kim Regala, Staff Writer

Have a seat, Steve.

Before we begin, we want you to know that we’re only doing this out of pure concern. Concern for you, but most importantly, concern for the recent changes in your Twitter feed, changes to which we are being subjected. This may be painful for you to hear, but we’re your friends, and it hurts us even more.

Ready to listen? Good. 

Steve, what you do behind closed doors is entirely up to you. But as soon as you start broadcasting your . . . political alignments for us to see, it’s a whole other level of selfishness. 

Just last Tuesday, you retweeted something from CBC News. Now, I’ve come to master the art of swiping past anything with the word “News” on it. I’m basically like Cassandra of Troy but for predicting invasive updates on current events. Just this once, though, I slipped up. There I was. Staring at Justin Trudeau delivering some speech. 

I had to binge three hours worth of TikToks afterward, just to rebalance my neurochemistry. All thanks to you.

And this isn’t an isolated incident. I didn’t want to say anything, Steve, but I was the first to notice your problem. Just over a month ago, I saw that you followed . . . The New York Times. At first I told myself that maybe this was just some prank. But, as always, we would have been way better off accepting what we were seeing online at total face value with no further speculation or critical thinking. 

Because you really were a Twitter warrior now, Steve. And things escalated quickly as you went from Retweets of news outlets to Tweets of your own. It was so difficult for us to witness your downfall into #cdnpoli.

The worst day was when you started making . . . Threads. At that point, we couldn’t even feel sorry for you, just repulsed. Your very first string of “(1/?)”, “(2/?)”, “(3/?)”, onward was not just a countdown to the end of your socially aware tirade. It was the countdown to disaster — but not one of those cute disasters like earthquakes or hurricanes, the kind we blandly acknowledge in conversation while never donating to relief efforts. It was the disaster of losing a best friend to madness and empathy for others. 

Steve, we should have reached out and offered you help right away. I know, and I’m sorry that we didn’t. I’m so sorry — for us. Maybe if I had talked to you when I first caught wind of what was going on, your problem wouldn’t be as bad as it is now, and it wouldn’t now be our problem. 

But honestly? I, at least, was in denial. I mean, God forbid we have someone in our friend group who actually pays attention to what’s happening in the world. 

I thought you of all people would be the last to ever try and destroy our dynamic like this. But I was so wrong. I guess that’s the one downside of being consistently misinformed, you know. Being wrong every so often.

You’re out of hand, Steve. We don’t think you’re a bad person, but we do think you need a lot of help. We love you, and we just want things back to the way they used to be.

Your weekly SFU horoscopes: March 9–March 15

0
An illustration of a girl with long flowing hair. Astrological signs and stars shine around her.
ILLUSTRATION: Marissa Ouyang / The Peak

Written by Zach Siddiqui, Humour Editor

Aries — March 21–April 19

You yearn to rest this week, but you may find it difficult to properly recharge. You’ll try to learn from your phone’s example, only to be faced with a big, sudden shock. Energy comes in good and bad forms — like the difference between nine hours of sleep and electrocution.

Taurus — April 20–May 20

The continued motionlessness of SFU’s satellite campuses means continued inertia for your love life. Just like Selena Gomez, you are “so sick of that same old love.” Unlike Selena Gomez, you have no money, power, or influence amongst Wizards of Waverly Place fans with which to build a better existence for yourself. Fade away into the concrete. 

Gemini — May 21–June 20

Choose the correct fate this week. Be the real you. Let your Dairy Queen overrule your Orange Julius. 

Cancer — June 21–July 22

Buy a fresh bucket of chicken when the desire takes you. It will be more fulfilling than the bad poetry you fleetingly considered writing instead.

Leo — July 23–August 22

Playing crane games would be dangerous this week. You will relate too heavily to everyone who’s ever failed to get to know you. Then again, the pain of the inferior does smell delightfully of lavender.

Virgo — August 23–September 22

The television is usurping you this week. You’re the one who’s supposed to be brainwashing the masses, not media corporations. It’s fine. Let it go. Someone else can guide humanity to a utopian future for once. 

Libra — September 23–October 22

You may awaken to find yourself lying on the operating table. Not literally, like in a horror movie. But figuratively, as in realizing mid-conversation that you’re being mentally dissected in search of insecurities to prey on. Don’t let them find out about your occasional dark impulse to unbalance your most annoying roommate’s chequebook.

Scorpio — October 23–November 21

Cashiers will lie to you this week about selling you the item you said you wanted. Don’t hold a grudge. It’s not like that random thing you paid $5 and totally didn’t need is really what you “wanted,” either. Nothing could fill that category, besides absolution. 

Sagittarius — November 22–December 21

So when are you graduating, anyway?

Capricorn — December 22–January 19

You have been on the path of discarding the trash people in your life. This is the week to properly sort them, as per municipal by-laws. Some deserve to be composted. Others, such as the plastic-hearted friends who have more LinkedIn connections than you, could stand to be recycled. 

Aquarius — January 20–February 18

You may struggle with zipping and unzipping your backpack this week. If you don’t, then you have an abnormally low amount of baggage, and I’m scared.

Pisces — February 19–March 20

You may find yourself navigating the dark realms of St. Patrick’s Day this week. Shamrocks? More like scamrocks. The only greenery worth celebrating is the Amazon Rainforest, lungs of the world (after you ignore the phytoplankton in the oceans because they don’t evoke a good enough emotional response from readers) — you can’t breathe luck.

The Best of 2020’s Hot Chocolate Festival

0
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

by Sara Wong, Peak Associate

Vancouver’s Hot Chocolate Festival only comes around once a year, and for 2020 I went all out. There were 44 participating cafes offering 114 flavours, and I ended up going to 22 places and trying 43 flavours. Was I crazy? Yes. Was it worth it? Most definitely. Without further ado, here are my top 5 favourite hot chocolates from this year’s festival. 

 

  1. “Japanese First Kiss” – Baker and Table Cafe
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

As soon as I took a sip of this hot chocolate, all my problems melted away. Baker and Table used Callebaut chocolate from Belgium. This made the drink nice and decadent while the incorporation of yuzu (which is a small Asian citrus fruit) ensured that the hot chocolate was not too rich. I thought the size of the hot chocolate was small, but once I ate the mochi bun that came with it I realized that it was the perfect portion. Speaking of that mochi bun, it was the most addicting and life-changing dessert I’ve had in the past year! No wonder they’re Baker and Table’s specialty item. The dough was soft and pillowy on the inside, with a nice crust on the outside for texture difference, and the chocolate raspberry mochi filling was sticky and sweet, without going overboard. I was very happy with this pairing.

 

  1. “Taste of Peru” – Thierry 
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

Since this was an anniversary special, it actually wasn’t my first time trying Thierry’s “Taste of Peru” hot chocolate. The fact that it has remained on my top 5 list for this year reflects how good this drink is. The hot chocolate was made with a bittersweet chocolate from the Marañón region of Peru called Fortunato No.4. It was paired with a buttery coconut sable cookie and mini tempered chocolate bar. Every element was executed well and everything together created an enjoyable drinking experience.

 

  1. “Amethyst Kiss” –  La Glace
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

La Glace’s “Amethyst Kiss” was definitely one of the most unique hot chocolates I had during this year’s festival. I liked how the white hot chocolate was smooth and creamy, yet not cloyingly sweet. They infused the white chocolate with violet, which was translated clearly with the sprinkling of flower petals on top that also boosted the presentation. On the side was a mini cone of violet cassis sherbet that complimented the drink nicely; the berry flavour of cassis added more depth of flavour to the subtle taste of violets. The sherbet was so delicious that I ended up buying an entire pint of it to bring home! 

 

  1. “Where the Grass is Greener” – Cadeaux Bakery
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

My eyes almost popped out of my head when I got this drink. I love bubble tea and I love hot chocolate; Cadeaux was giving me the best of both worlds! The drink itself was huge — without a doubt the best value of all the hot chocolates I drank for the festival. Compared to the majority of the other drinks, Cadeaux’s was a simple milk chocolate . . . but it was one of the best damn milk hot chocolate I have had in my life. The grass jelly hiding beneath the surface was a fun addition, and the pandan pistachio sable cookie sandwich served on the side was chock full of flavour and texture. I seriously hope they bring back this flavour next year.

 

  1. “Hot Yoda” – Soirette
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak
Photo: Sara Wong / The Peak

In this case, the hot chocolate lived up to the hype. Previously, I found Soirette to deliver phenomenally on presentation, but not so much on flavour. However, this year, they really stepped up their game. The challenge in picking my all-time favourite hot chocolate flavour of 2020 was not where, but which. Soirette served two more flavours alongside the Baby Yoda inspired hot chocolate, a mango-chocolate drink decorated with a chocolate llama topper, and a strawberry and peach schnapps hot chocolate with a unicorn design. Originally, I had the mango-chocolate llama as my favourite, but after having their drinks twice, my mind was changed. The “Hot Yoda” hot chocolate was rich and earthy thanks to the hojicha; it was the epitome of how a hot chocolate should make you feel — warm, happy, and content.

To see more of the hot chocolate I drank this year, check out my Instagram profile @sara_star_

Wet’suwet’en Student Walkout draws crowd of around 100 to Convocation Mall

2
SFU students walked out of class in solidarity with Wet'suwet'en

By: Gabrielle McLaren, Editor-in-Chief

Students gathered in Convocation Mall on the afternoon of March 4 to listen to Indigenous speakers, singers, and drummers during a Student Walkout in support of the Wet’suwet’en nation. 

As the Walkout’s media advisory described, “The nation-wide student walkout is a peaceful, decentralized action of solidarity. Students across the country stand firmly in solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs and will continue to do so until their demands have been fully met. Our academic institutions are complicit in this violent violation of Wet’suwet’en sovereignty. Many institutions have declined to make a statement, and maintain Foundation and pension investments in TC Energy and the Coastal Gaslink Pipeline.” 

Baby Lee-Young, one of the event organizers, who identified as a second-generation Korean settler, started off the event by acknowledging the territories on which the event was held and which commuters had most likely crossed en route to campus. They emphasized the importance of Indigenous voices and stories in today’s event, asking media inquiries to the event’s media coordinator. 

Diverse speakers spoke about a range of issues to a crowd whose size waned from 50 to 100 students throughout the afternoon. 

Terrence shared his experience as a near-lifelong land defender before sharing Cree songs. He also spoke about the ongoing violence faced by his Indigenous friends and family. Saskia, a Heiltsuk Nation student, spoke of the importance of preserving land for future generations and respecting Indigenous laws and sovereignty on Indigenous land.  

Matt considered himself privileged to be able to attend SFU and of his hopes to use his education and Indigenous heritage to work in public policy. He also made the crowd aware of the risks that protestors were exposing themselves to and encouraged activists to look after one another — and Indigenous elders, women, and youth as well. Isaiah played a few songs on the drum he brought, which was shared with protestors. 

Edgard, of Tahitian, Kaska, and Nahua heritage, spoke about the discrimination faced by urban Indigenous peoples and the ongoing effects of genocide and discrimination. Kayah, an SFU student of the Tulalip and Tsleil-Waututh Nations, spoke about her own nation and family’s long-lasting fight against a pipeline in their own land. 

SFSS President Giovanni HoSang, a Jamaican settler with Canadian citizenship, was the only non-Indigenous speaker. He positioned himself as a stolen person on stolen land, as someone descended from enslaved peoples, before leading the crowd in chants and song. 

The Peak spoke with SFU Indigenous Studies and Health Sciences student April Kornitsky, who was a media spokesperson for the student walkout. 

“Support from students has been outstanding,” said media spokesperson and SFU Indigenous Studies student April, in an interview with The Peak. She added that her professor sent an email to the entire class, encouraging them to attend the walkout. “I have to do a write up on Indigenous events that I’ve attended and do it’s encouraged to do the first walkout that was done at SMU as one of the events that you can report on,” she said.

April also said that she has come across instances of ignorance on campus about Indigenous issues, and the Wet’suwet’en protest specifically. “I find that there is a lot of misinformation, people are taking out of context bits from the media. [ . . . ] They don’t understand the difference between the hereditary and appointed chiefs. 

People believe it’s solely about the coastal gas pipeline, but there’s so many more issues at hand regarding the laws and human rights, RCMP violence, and people don’t understand the full story of what’s going on,” she said.

April added, “I would like to add that this is not a protest. This is a demand of human rights to be respected.” 

Throughout the event, a table by the front stage was installed where attendees could purchase jewellery and art made by Indigenous youth by donations, which would go to support the ongoing protests and the Unist’ot’en Camp

The event ended with an invitation by event organizers to join them in marching down to Gaglardi way for a temporary partial road blockade, covered in a separate article.

Read The Peak’s coverage of the road blockade here

Students block Gaglardi in solidarity with Wet’suwet’en

2

By: Gabrielle McLaren, Editor-in-Chief

Following a rally in solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en Nation at Convocation Mall, a group of Indigenous and settler students marched down Burnaby Mountain to block part of the intersection at Gaglardi Way and University Drive East. SFU students joined others across the province and the country in the March 4 National Student Walkout. The road was blocked for over 40 minutes. 

Event organizers preceded the march down to Gaglardi by describing the itinerary to students and notifying the crowd that SFU Security was present. They were clear that students concerned for their safety should reach out to event organizers. 

“Know that you protect each other [ . . . ] Just do what you think is right for yourself and make sure that you are with a group,” said Baby Lee-Young, one of the event’s organizers who identified during the rally as a second-generation settler.

SFSS President Giovanni HoSang and one of the rally speakers Kayah, a student of the Tulalip and Tsleil-Waututh nations, led the group in chants as they walked down the mountain. Students carried signs ranging from the SFSS’s “In Solidarity” banner to homemade signs reading “No Pipeline on Stolen Land,” “The Métis Nation stands in solidarity with Wet’suwet’en,” and “Reconciliation is Dead.” Chants and singing continued for as long as the line was held. 

Traffic up and down Gaglardi Road was partially blocked. Some buses did stop and unload passengers (some of whom joined the line), and some vehicles coming up the mountain were redirected to University Drive. Masked protestors and students encouraged drivers to make U-turns back up the mountain and leave by following University Drive East down to the Burnaby Mountain Parkway. 

SFU Security was on the scene, as were TransLink transit supervisors. 

Student reactions at the intersection and on social media 

Content note: the following section includes threats of violence issued against students. Readers may skip to the next header to read about the event’s closure, including thoughts from Indigenous participants. 

Students were met with various reactions from passersby, including honks, bicycle bells ringing, heckling, and cheers. A masked protestor who helped students organize on the street and direct traffic away from the blocked street warned students that drivers may attempt to inch closer to them as a scare tactic. 

They later informed The Peak that one driver who refused to go back up the mountain threatened to drive through protestors. A cement truck driver honked for over 10 minutes before turning around to the sound of cheering and applause.  

In regards to the backlash, one leader reminded students that “Indigenous people do this every day!” before leading a chant: “What do we do when Indigenous rights are under attack?” / “Stand up, fight back!” 

Students who weren’t in attendance took to social media to spread the news and share their thoughts. A post in the Facebook group Must Knows for Courses at SFU had a range of comments, including one comment with over 30 Likes reading “Lol what a fucking joke. Anyone participating in this is a degenerate.” 

Another student, whose comment received over 100 Likes read: “Reminder that, just like the TransLink strike, the people who have the power to stop this are the government. If you are angry that infrastructure is being blocked, be angry at the government for not respecting the basic rights of [I]ndigenous peoples according to provincial, federal, and international law. The government is responsible for the inconvenience you’re incurring, not the protesters.”  

Some students also reacted with humour, including one who wrote “lol if it weren’t for the protest, one would think the 145 broke down again . . .” to which someone else replied “pick your poison I suppose!”     

Students on the SFU subreddit noted that the protest was an inconvenience to them. One user wrote: “I had to walk down the entire mountain to Burquitlam. Halfway through my trip I guess they started letting buses through so I watched around 10 pass me by on my journey. Great times.” 

Other users called for protesters to be arrested. One student wished that “it was legal to run them off the road” and another asked “Is it your fault if you run them over?” Another student, who insisted that the nature of protests was to disrupt, wrote “I’m sorry you were minorly inconvenienced, I guess.” 

In an email interview with The Peak, HoSang wrote that he was pleased with the turnout at both the rally and partial blockade. He noted that “The SFSS has received some complaints regarding some inconvenience that the partial blockade had caused and I appreciate their patience.”

He emphasized that an alternative pathway to exit the mountain was undisturbed by students, and added: “I would love to refer folks to our statement regarding actions in solidarity and why it is necessary for student unions to use our collective power to stand in solidarity with Wet’suwet’en.”

The SFSS issued a statement of solidarity back in early February and was one of the eight BC student societies to sign an additional statement on the day of the National Walkout. 

Two members of the RCMP arrived shortly after students walked off the street to reconvene on the grass on the side of the road. 

Closing the event 

Students gathered on a patch of grass off the road and an Indigenous student named April smudged the circle. She took the time to explain to The Peak what smudging was and why smudging the circle — something she had never done before — was important to her.

“I brought my medicines with me just in case,” April explained. “ . . . I smudged the circle with sage to allow space for positive energy because sage clears the negative air. These are my traditional teachings, they have been gifted to me, this eagle feather that I use, it was a gift to me, and it’s not something that’s done very casually. I thought that it was appropriate in this situation though.”  

April also shared her view of the event, which she considers a demand of human rights more than anything else. She reminded students to be critical of media at this time, and encouraged them to always refer back to sources from the front lines. 

“Being silent is being a bystander,” she said when encouraging students to be vocal on social media. “Make posts, put them on your story, and share correct information.” 

Saskia, a Heiltsuk student who spoke at the rally, addressed the group before students returned to Burnaby Mountain to go home. She expressed how unique the wave of solidarity for the Wet’suwet’en was.

“I’m hearing it from people who have been on the front lines their whole lives, that this is different [ . . . ] because the settler population is taking interest in our lives and our livelihoods and our water and our health, the health of our Earth. And we as Indigenous people are the custodians of this land.” 

Kayah called the experience beautiful.

“To stand shoulder to shoulder with each and every one of you was absolutely amazing,” she said. “Wet’suwet’en, and all the youth, and all the Indigenous people, and the future generations, and the land, and the water thank you all for being here, for standing up, and being strong.” 

If you’re not using RateMyProfessors by now, you should be

0
Find out definitively what other students think of your potential professor. Illustration: Maple Sukontasukkul/The Peak

By: Nicole Magas, Opinions Editor

We are over the hump of the semester, so to speak, which for most SFU students means it’s time for course selection. As we drag ourselves out of the carnage of midterm season, a new sort of panic sets it. Will the classes you want fill up before you get a seat? Is that last breadth course you need available in the summer? How do you know this one class or professor won’t absolutely murder your GPA?

That said, it is prime time in the semester for SFU memes to be replaced with questions about classes and professors on social media. And I understand it — fear of the unknown can be just as bad as suffering through a semester with a genuinely bad professor. However, social media sites like Facebook and Reddit aren’t the greatest places to go for information on professors or classes. Honestly, outside of asking friends who may have taken the same class, I rely almost exclusively on RateMyProfessors.com.

There are a number of reasons why RateMyProfessors is a superior source of information to social media — take specificity, for example. You can throw dozens of questions into the wind about this-or-that class  or Dr. So-and-so and not get any answers. This is because social media users aren’t going to these sites exclusively to answer your questions about professors. (Also apathy, but there’s not much we can do about that.) RateMyProfessors is all about rating professors, period, and it does so with clear and simple criteria that makes information easily understandable.

The structure of the site is another advantage. I often see questions on social media framed in terms of whether or not this-or-that class is difficult. However, questions like these aren’t likely to yield useful results. How a class is taught — even what material is taught in a class — is subject to change depending on which professor is teaching it. Since professors tend to rotate class schedules depending on availability, asking about the difficulty of a class in any given semester from students who have already taken it is going to give a mix of answers. RateMyProfessors, on the other hand, shows students which classes each professor has taught, so they can get the opinions of students who have been in the same situation.

And speaking of students like you, RateMyProfessors allows users to self-report what grades they received in the class. This is important because we’ve all heard a C-average student who spends more time at The Study than actually studying complaining about what awful professors they’ve had. Like, buddy, are they really that bad, or are you just a shitty student? By comparing reported grades to professor reviews, students can take reviews at the extreme ends of the grade bell curve with a grain of salt. Or, they can find reviews with grades that match their own average and read about those students’ experiences. 

Finally, let’s talk about anonymity. RateMyProfessors is completely anonymous. On the internet, this always comes with some risk of attracting bad actors, and I’m not going to pretend that this isn’t potentially the case here as well. However, I feel that the anonymity on RateMyProfessors actually helps more than hurts what the site is trying to do. This is because anonymity erases identity, which erases ego. No one is going to get internet points by trashing or exaggerating on RateMyProfessors. If people are salty about a professor, they usually leave their reasons for why. It’s not hard to compare those reviews with others to get a sense of which people are out to get a professor, and which ones genuinely want to leave their feedback. 

Of course, RateMyProfessors is only as good as the people who leave reviews, so I encourage everyone to rate their professors at the end of each semester to help fellow students out. But the way I see it, we spend hours filling out bubble sheets of confidential professor feedback in class every semester that students never get to see. RateMyProfessors actually provides a dedicated platform for students to share this valuable information amongst themselves.

 

7 Minute Majors: How to decide what to study

0
Photo courtesy of SFU

By: Meera Eragoda, Staff Writer

SFU’s Academic Advising Department held an event entitled 7 Minute Majors, on March 5 at 10:30 a.m. According to the event page, this event is for anyone who is unsure of what to major in, interested in exploring other program options, or would like to hear from directly from students in various programs.

The event took place in Saywell Hall and attendees were provided pizza and refreshments. A representative from each major was placed at a table and one to two attendees made their way to a table every seven minutes.

The majors represented were communication, health science, human geography, linguistics, political science, philosophy, resource and environmental management, economics, criminology, and actuarial science.

At each table, the representatives asked what the attendees’ majors were and, where possible, attempted to relate the major they were representing to the majors of the attendees. They covered what each program was like and why they were passionate about it, with the caveat that they were not allowed to talk about career opportunities that these majors led to.

Kaitlyn Brown, a first year student and undeclared major, found the event helpful. “I just wanted to get an idea of the possibilities that were out there to major in because I didn’t really know what was out there.” 

Prior to this event, she had taken a couple of linguistics courses and found herself very interested in it. As a result of this event, and getting to talk to the representative for linguistics, she believes she’s found her major. 

“It really helped me understand more about it so I found that really helpful because now I think I might major in it.”

A transfer student from Douglas College, Julia Brown, was at the event exploring minor options to complement her sociology major. When asked how she found the event, Brown responded, “Inspirational. It informs me that there’s a lot more major opportunities than what you think are there. You think of the big ones, english, psych, science, you don’t really think there’s all these facets you can get into. But this has now shown me that there are so many.” 

Brown also added, “It’s a tad overwhelming because there are so many options and you really have to take advantage of these resources, academic advisors, and career advisors because with so many opportunities you just have to narrow them down. In that sense, it might be overwhelming but it’s still really good.”

Leo Chen, the representative for actuarial science, told The Peak that he decided to volunteer because there are only about 12 people in the program this year. 

“Because of how small it is, I thought it would be nice to get the word out about our program because it may be something people might want to explore. But if [students] don’t know about it, how do they know to explore?”

Human Geography representative, Leo Dittmer said that he wanted to participate in this event because he changed his major since starting at SFU. 

“I think I understand what people might be thinking if they’re not sure what they want to go into. And then also because I think if I hadn’t taken a human geography course, I wouldn’t have any idea what it was like,” he said. “It’s one of those ones that unless somebody explains it to you, you have no idea what that is.”

Intro to Coding Workshop held by Women’s Centre and Women in Computing Science

0
Photo courtesy of SFU

By: Kim Regala, Staff Writer

In celebration of International Women’s Day (IWD), the SFSS Women’s Centre and Women in Computing Science (WiCS) SFSS club held an event called the IWD Intro to Coding Workshop on March 3.

Women and non-binary individuals were invited to a two-hour session of learning Python (a common programming language), networking, and a Q&A panel from WiCS members. Facilitating the workshop was WiCS Technical Coordinator Dawn Chandler, and Graduate students Carmen Riddel, Raquel Aoki, and Jennifer Dai.

The purpose of the workshop was to learn how to code a password generator, a tool that would generate complex passwords to be used in online accounts. Chandler first demonstrated how the application worked, giving an idea of what attendees would be working towards. In order to accommodate every person’s learning speed, each attendee had access to the instructions on the PowerPoint slides on their individual computers. This gave the option of following along with the whole group or moving at one’s own pace.

As this was an event to introduce beginners to the basic concepts of coding in Python, Chandler primarily stuck with simple items of instruction which did not require prior experience. The other WiCS mentors were also readily available for help, checking in on the attendees to answer questions and guide them through the process.

The event concluded with a Q&A panel, where WiCS members openly answered questions raised by attendees. This opened up an insightful discussion regarding personal experiences of learning how to code, as well as online resources for further continuing to learn coding.

After the event, attendees enjoyed networked and mingled with one another while enjoying a delicious selection of food provided by the Women’s Centre.

For any of those who were unable to attend but are interested in this workshop’s topic, a demo and the PowerPoint from the event are available to the public via the event’s page.

Peak Sports Mailbag: Golf

1
Learn how to improve quickly and save money on golf in this week’s Mailbag. — Photo: Amazon

By: Juztin Bello, Copy Editor

Hello readers of The Peak sports section,

Welcome to the Peak Sports Mailbag. My name is Juztin Bello and I’m this week’s host of the golf-themed Mailbag. I’ve been playing golf since I was five years old and come from a very golf-centric family — truth be told, we sometimes decide who pays for dinner based on whoever loses the round of golf.  

Thanks so much to all of our readers that submitted their golf-related questions, and my apologies if your question didn’t make it into this week’s edition. Usually, the Mailbag host will only answer three questions. Don’t worry though, you can find more of your questions answered online. Also, each question submitted counts for an entry into the raffle draw whether or not they are addressed in the Mailbag. Now, onto the questions!

Question 1: What are some of the best places to golf in the Lower Mainland? – Jay 

In the interest of length, I’ll only give you my top three courses. My first recommendation is Burnaby Mountain Golf Course. According to their website, they are rated on Golf Digest as one of the best courses to play in North America. As someone who has been several times, I can vouch for this. The fairways are well maintained, and it’s quite affordable in comparison to some other courses I’ve been to. The cheapest price (for weekdays and weekends) is $15 at sunset, with the most expensive rate being $43 for mid-day on weekends.  

Swaneset is another course I would recommend — it’s actually where I started doing lessons when I turned eight and my dad decided I should get some extra practice. Located in Pitt Meadows, Swaneset features two beautifully crafted courses: the Resort course and the Links course, which are both worth playing. I should also mention the food here is top-notch, which can be helpful in either celebrating a good game or coping with a bad one. 

Finally, if you’re willing to make the drive, Furry Creek is one of the most breathtaking courses you could ever have the pleasure of playing on. Described on their scorecard as “BC’s most scenic golf course,” Furry Creek features the best that a golf course the Sea to Sky Highway has to offer. While a little on the pricey side, the inclusion of a shared golf cart, three golf balls, bottled water, a cooler, a USB connection, and a club cleaner makes up for the higher price. 

Question 2: What recommendations do you have for the most efficient approach to improving at golf? Like, what parts of the game should I focus on first as someone relatively new to golf? – Rob

While some could argue that perfecting your drive and improving your distance are the most efficient, I personally think that working on your short game is huge. What I mean by short game is how you approach the green from a relatively short-range distance, usually at pitching distance (pitching being a type of swing used with a wedge). If you can hit a ball far from the tee box, that’s great, but how you get onto the green afterwards can really determine how well you finish a hole.

How you play on the green is also something you should work on — putting can truly make or break you. If you can get onto the green in two strokes, but it takes you four or five putts to get into the hole, you’ve basically wasted your approach. You’ll want to practice putting so that you can learn how to read a green; this can include knowing how a green is going to slope, how fast a green is going to be, and so on.

The best way to practice both your short game and putting would be through playing pitch and putt courses, which only have holes less than 100-yards long. A pitch and putt course I frequent is Kensington Pitch & Putt: it’s a relatively easy course for beginners and has a great variety of yardages and greens for practice.

Question 3: Golf seems like an expensive sport. How can I reduce costs associated with golfing and get better at golf without spending a ton of money? – Kyle 

For starters, some golf courses offer specials depending on the time of day. Look for twilight or sunset specials, as those tend to be the cheapest options. Another way you can reduce costs is by walking instead of renting a golf cart. What you’ll miss in speedy gameplay and ease of transportation you’ll make up for in saved dollars and added exercise. 

If you’re looking to improve and also want to save some money, you could always just hit the driving range. Eaglequest, which is a course I’ve been to numerous times since I started playing, has special bonus-ball hours at their driving range where you can get an additional 30 balls per unit. Bonus-ball hours are on their website, but I typically enjoy the 7:30 p.m.–9:30 p.m. slot since the volume of people is usually lower. A regular unit (60 balls) is $7.50.

If you would like to participate in future editions of the Peak Sports Mailbag and be entered in a raffle for an end-of-semester prize, here’s what you can send to [email protected]

  • Sports-related questions that our weekly host will answer
  • Weekly theme ideas to guide our questions

Or: sign up to host the Mailbag (and get paid)!

Thanks to all of you SFU sports fans for blowing up my inbox!

The next original Mailbag theme is: NHL playoffs

The host for the NHL playoff Mailbag is: Dylan Webb

Send in your questions to [email protected]

What Grinds Our Gears: I’m haunted by group project members ghosting in the chat

0
Screenshot: Chris Ho/The Peak

By: Juztin Bello, Copy Editor

It’s the first day of class and you’ve been forced into groups for a semester-long project — great start. You do the classic “none of us want to do this, so we’ll find solidarity in our disdain” round of small-talk with your group members, and decide that conversing over Facebook Messenger will be most productive. Being the keener that you are (purely out of an inherent desire for productivity, mothering, overachievement, and control), you decide to initiate a conversation in the group chat to get some ideas rolling and check in. And what happens to your message?

Seen. Read. Blatantly ignored. Hurled into the abyss — yeeted, if you will.

I get it, life happens. It’s unrealistic to assume that everyone will be available to respond to a message right away. But if you’re unresponsive for days at a time, how do you expect your group to know what you want to do and what your opinions are? 

And don’t get me started on group members who view a message and choose not to respond. If we’re in the midst of discussing group tasks or ideas and someone is just watching and not saying anything, what do you think you’re accomplishing? The great (but shady) thing about Facebook Messenger is it shows you who has seen a message. If you’re just lurking in the chat and choosing not to contribute, we see you.

Just in case you’re brand new, it’s called a group chat for a reason: it’s designed for a group of people to orchestrate a chat. Group chat doesn’t mean “one person asks a question, and only one person responds, despite everyone seeing it.”