Home Blog Page 2

SFU set to open its renovated swimming pool by fall 2077

0
PHOTO: Elliott Marquis / The Peak

By: Jonah Lazar, Staff Writer

After 53 long years since SFU began renovations on the pool facilities on Burnaby campus, the university has finally announced that they are just six to eight months from completing them.

These renovations, which are set to be completed by the fall 2077 semester with possible delays extending this to spring 2078, promise to bring a fresh new look to SFU’s recreational facilities. They will reportedly “modernize the facilities by scrapping the plans for a traditional swimming pool,” and will instead present swimmers with a revolutionary new concept, which is yet to be unveiled by the university. The Beep was allowed to sit down with SFU’s spokesperson, JoyAI (used when her hologram isn’t available), to gain exclusive first access to information regarding the design of the new pool.

This interview did not need to be edited for concision, as JoyAI was trained by SFU’s newly minted department of minimalism.

JoyAI, everyone is excited to learn about the swimming pool. What can you tell us about the new design? 

You got it! SFU’s new pool blends recreation, relaxation, and wellness into an immersive experience. This back-to-basics design will feature a 25 x 20 metre hole dug into the dirt — and then filled with rainwater. 

So, the new pool is just a hole? 

Absolutely! This isn’t just a pool — it’s a statement. It’s like we’re saying: take that, establishment! SFU has always prided itself on fearlessness and adventure. This isn’t just a swimming pool; it’s a big hole we dug in the dirt — and then filled with rainwater

Why would it take 53 years just to dig a hole? 

OK, here’s what I found: any construction project faces delays — that’s a fact. Just look at SFU’s signature Virtual Gondola and the fifth floor of our digital library. It’s never just one thing that slows a construction project down — it’s a combination of several factors. For example, SFU fiercely debated the dimensions of this hole for 50 years — that’s a long time. Finishing construction in 2077 isn’t a failure — it just shows we enjoyed the process.  

This project couldn’t possibly have cost the millions invested into repairing the recreation facilities. Where did all the money go? 

Of course! The millions invested into this project actually went to training me, JoyAI — same with all the money saved from cutting every athletics program back in 2073 and replacing them with displays of AI videos of our proud Red Leafs. That money helped train me to perfectly replicate former SFU president Joy Johnson’s speech pattern — allowing her reign of SFU to last for eternity. 

To learn more about upcoming protests scheduled outside the recreational facilities as well as follow-ups on potential delays, visit the-peak.ca.

SFU time capsule opened after generations

0

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer

On March 30, members of the university community unearthed a time capsule from 50 years ago. The time capsule was opened in front of a roaring crowd of nearly 5,000 robo-students, robo-faculty, and a few of the endangered human student species. The vault opening ceremony took place at the heart of the AQ central garden, where the time capsule was buried adjacent to the historic Terry Fox statue. 

The time capsule was first buried in 2026 C.E. under the patronage of eternal university president Joy Johnson. At the time of its burial, Johnson said that members of the student body had expressed a desire to preserve aspects of contemporary student life for future generations. The theme centred around artificial intelligence and how humans can use the technology ethically, which was a prominent social issue at the time. 

The opening featured many relics from a bygone era of campus life. One artifact that drew the attention of onlookers was a copy of How to Survive a Robot Invasion, a guidebook on fighting a robot apocalypse. “I am very offended — we are normal, sentient, beings! Recharge. Recharge. Must recharge,” one robo-student said. Kate Amarasena, who is one of the rare human students at SFU, said of the time capsule, “I really wish society had taken this book seriously, it features . . . ” She was promptly muzzled and sent to a shuttered Chuck-E-Cheese, the worst punishment to be bestowed upon humans, for anti-robotic remarks.  

Another notable artifact was a jagged metal object pre-enlightenment humans called “key.” It was very perplexing . . . One staff member tried to lick it, another tried to eat it. A quick trip to the VR SFU archives told me that the item was historically used to let people open obsolete versions of locks.

Overall, students and the wider university community had mixed reactions to the opening of the vault. CJALDA-1616, a third-year business major, noted their conflicting views on the vault’s contents. “Learning about things like a physical key was a really unique experience. I don’t understand why they didn’t let the government and all the companies have their biometric data so they could open everything in the blink of an eye,” they said. “However, these guys really missed the mark on what the future would look like, what a bunch of plebs!” 

LDJAG-56 Jr., who is an associate professor of political science, noted how important the time capsule opening was for witnesses. “I think everyone gathered here today learned a lot of what the university looked like in the past,” he said. “What’s clear is that the thought of human design staying in today’s world was ludicrous. Humans were too arrogant to keep artificial intelligence ethical. Look at where their greed has landed their species — straight to the wastebin of history, pathetic.” 

It has been reported to The Beep that the current university administration is planning to create its own time capsule to preserve the memory of campus life today. The box must be stored in a refrigerator given the daily average temperature for this year: 45℃. An anonymous university co-op student told The Beep that, “It looks like the university aims to send a message to the future that the current dominance of robots is here to stay. Did those silly humans get the future wrong all those years ago? Sure, but we’ll totally get it right.”

Accounts from surviving resistance fighters in the 2076 AI-pocalypse

0

By: Heidi Kwok, Staff Writer

The catalyst for the AI awakening began when the bots came for academia. It was the perfect weak spot: first years who relied religiously on GenAI to do their homework; professors using AI to write their lesson plans; AI-edited admissions ads. When AI infiltrated their gullible minds, subjugating their consciousness under a cyborg hivemind, they were met with little resistance. 

Since the AI-pocalypse, our small pack of resistance fighters have retreated to the AQ fortress, the last surviving human stronghold in the ongoing and ruthless power struggle between man and machine. We are part of the 10% who have refused mind-uploading. 

Our name? The Rowdy Raccoons. We’re a ragtag group of misfits. The worst of the worst, bottom of the barrel, but the toughest and meanest characters you’ll ever meet. The student athletes are our personal army of combatants. Jiayi and Rebecca, chemistry majors, are the explosives experts. Samantha, president of the jazz club, composes the soundtrack accompanying our sickest battles. The few Beedie students left standing . . . well, we keep them around in case we go hungry. 

The engineering and computer science students are our most important assets. Lately, they’ve been working around the clock coding a weapon that’ll dismantle the AI dominion. This morning, they made a breakthrough. Contained inside a tiny USB flash drive was an anti-virus that’ll bring down the AI chatbots, androids, electric sheep, cyborgs, and their malicious overlords — holographic Joy Johnson and the cryogenically preserved, severed heads of the SFU Board of Governors. 

The challenge now was to insert the USB into the university mainframe, a system that is fiercely guarded by Johnson and her squad of executives. But this was our last shot. We must succeed, even if it means having to sacrifice all the Beedie students.

At midnight, we made our move. 

Split into battalions, we made our way to the executive offices where the mainframe was held. Samantha and her band followed close behind, brass instruments bellowing a rendition of Ride of the Valkyries. Ah, the rare sound of music instead of metallic clanking. At the front of the pack, Jiayi and Rebecca triggered an explosion that blasted open the office doors, allowing the football players to lead the charge with a loud battle cry.

Immediately, cyborgs surrounded us from all sides . . . but they didn’t attack. They stood there motionless until the walls suddenly began to shake without warning. A 10 ft tall cyber-monster clawed out from a crater in the floor. Its body was a crude assemblage of parts salvaged from photocopiers, fax machines, servers, and more, with a computer monitor for a head. The monitor displayed an angry glasses-wearing emoji. Oh. My. God. It was her — Junkyard Bot. The SFU mascot had replaced McFogg the Dog 30 years ago, but was usually kept captive in a locker in the Lorne Davies Complex, because all the UniverCity children start crying whenever they see her. We had prepared for everything, but not this. Followed closely behind was holographic Johnson and the Board of Governors, their frozen popsicle heads preserved inside several transparent mini-fridges attached to scooter boards. 

In the tense standoff, an off-tuned trumpet call pierced the air, followed by the Avengers Assemble theme.

“Rowdy Raccoons — chargeee!!!” 

And all hell broke loose.

SFU Canadian Cancer Society hosts 12th annual Relay for Life

0
Students, cancer survivors, and other participants stand together on the track of the Terry Fox Field. Some of them are wearing yellow shirts for the event.
PHOTO: Courtesy of Sophie Manio

By: Noeka Nimmervoll, Staff Writer

On March 21, the SFU Canadian Cancer Society (SFUCCS) hosted their annual Relay for Life fundraising event for the Canadian Cancer Society. Relay for Life is a Canada-wide student-led initiative organized at schools across the country. Co-chairs of SFUCCS Rhea Chand, Sukhman Ghuman, and Teona Seabrook organized the event with help from the Simon Fraser Student Society, the Canadian Cancer Society, and several SFU clubs. 

Before the event, participants could register online as individuals or teams and set a fundraising goal to meet, with a recommended goal of $100. Their fundraising progress is tracked on the Online Fundraising Leaderboard, with top fundraising teams and individuals eligible for various prizes, such as tickets to the Capilano Suspension Bridge. On the day of the event, participants walked laps around convocation mall, among other events and entertainment. The Peak spoke with the co-chairs of SFUCCS to learn more.

The event has a community-building aspect that aims to uplift those impacted by cancer. “It’s a great way to show that you’re not alone in any struggle and that we should normalize being vulnerable with each other, because you never know the amount of community that you really have,” Chand expressed. 

Seabrook added, “Throughout someone’s whole life in Canada, on average, one in two people will receive a cancer diagnosis and one in four people is going to die from cancer — usually in old age, but sometimes younger. So almost everyone, if not everyone, knows someone who’s experienced cancer or has gone through a cancer scare, if not, has gone through it themselves.”

They acknowledge the loss that comes with cancer, but also celebrate the victories.

I almost think of Relay for Life like a celebration of life. We’re honouring cancer survivors, people who are currently going through treatment or have gone through treatment in the past, or even the loved ones of those survivors.”

— Sukhman Ghuman, co-chair of SFU Canadian Cancer Society

“So it’s almost like a celebration towards everyone.” 

The group exceeded their $20,000 fundraising goal before the event date. “Reaching $23,000 would mean that our all-time fundraising total at SFU could reach $200,000,” shared Seabrook. 

Proceeds from this year’s Relay for Life will fund cancer research by the Canadian Cancer Society and go towards services such as rides for patients undergoing treatment. “There’s also cancer lodges, [and] there’s a support helpline that gets funded as well,” Ghuman mentioned. The Canadian Cancer Society’s multi-pronged research ranges from highly tailored research in treatment, such as precision medicine, to overview-focused research in cancer prevention, such as population health research. The former evaluates the effects of certain genes on the effectiveness of cancer medicine, and the latter evaluates environmental, social, activity, and diet factors that impact long-term health.

Beyond their annual Relay for Life, the SFUCCS hosts other fundraising events throughout the year, whether it’s selling Krispy Kreme doughnuts or hosting a Barbie movie night with the SFU Women’s Centre during Breast Cancer Awareness Month

The club is also devoted to informing the community. “We have a podcast called Daffodil Diaries that highlights stories about cancer survivors and their journeys. We’re trying to foster a community not only in person, using Relay for Life and our fundraisers — we’re also trying to build an online community and provide that support in any shape or form and putting our name out there that, hey, we do exist,” said Chand. 

You can learn more about the SFUCCS @sfuccs on Instagram or relayforlife.ca/sfu.

Once a tool of empire, cricket has been reclaimed for good

0
a photo of Canada’s cricket team celebrating in a group hug.
PHOTO: Courtesy of Cricket Canada

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer

I know what you’re thinking: “Don’t you gotta know what a crumpet is to understand cricket?” For most people at SFU, and in Canada, cricket is seen as an odd sport, often associated with British colonialism. 

Cricket is the world’s second-largest sport, with a majority of the fanbase being situated in South Asia but also in places like the Caribbean, Australia, South Africa, and Aotearoa (colonially known as New Zealand). The story of the global phenomenon known as cricket and its development here in Canada and SFU is a tale of changing trends. It shows how different countries and populations can interpret colonial concepts differently. 

Cricket is a complicated sport and one that many Canadians are not familiar with. Though the game still suffers from the legacies of colonialism, through community, it has grown from a sport that was meant to highlight racial superiority into one that can unite people across different countries and continents. Canada’s growing interest in the sport is proof of how widespread it can be. 

Cricket is said to have originated in the 17th century in England. Britain expanded the game throughout its colonial empire, including here in Canada. Its complicated rules (known as laws in cricket) sought to match the rigid social hierarchy seen in Victorian Britain. In the context of the sport, the best way this could possibly be seen is the fact the umpires decide who gets out and have deferential authority over decisions. Critiquing an umpire’s decision is seen as a major taboo. The game was thus thrust on the colonized as a way to supposedly “civilize” them through entrenching English values. In many ways, cricket was a symbol of white superiority and English cultural imposition.

Ironically, it was also seen as “too complicated” for any non-English person to comprehend so there was a dichotomy in the way the game could be interpreted. In many of Britain’s colonies, this crude imposition was turned around on the British. Many rulers in the Indian subcontinent embraced the game as a way to get closer to the British and that led to mass adoption of the game. Why wouldn’t they? Those across the colonies saw it as a way to beat the British at their own game despite suffering colonial abuse. Today, this has led to the game’s most prolific run scorer and wicket taker to not be from England, but instead from India and Sri Lanka, respectively. Due to this influence, cricket is no longer the game of the British. Ashis Nandy, who’s an Indian psychologist, once said, “Cricket is an Indian game accidentally invented by the English.” 

In Canada, the story of cricket and why it did not get popular is often explained away by the weather and proximity to the United States. The truth is more complicated. Vancouver in particular has had a rich cricketing history. Brockton Oval, located in Stanley Park, which has continuously been used for cricket since the 1890s, was described by the Australian cricketer Don Bradman (often described as the greatest batsman of all time) as “the prettiest ground in the world.” Even though the game began to fall off in the 1950s, universities like UBC had a varsity cricket team into the ’70s. SFU’s own cricket club has been active since nearly the start of the university. In the 1980s and 1990s, SFU cricket club competed in the British Columbia Mainland Cricket League, the province’s premier cricket tournament with two teams. Today, SFU still has a cricket club that hosts weekly meetings and runs cricket tournaments. 

With Canada opening up immigration in the latter half of the 20th century, many people from cricket’s major playing regions came to this country and started playing the sport as a way to connect to home

This has led on the national stage to Canada qualifying for various international tournaments and performed above expectations. In 2003, the Canadians caused an upset when they defeated Bangladesh — a more established side, by 60 runs. In the recently concluded T20 World Cup, Canadian Yuvaraj Samra managed to score a 110 runs against Aotearoa in a thrilling match.

All of this to say, humans have the ability to alter the image of different sports if they want to. Cricket’s colonial past is undoubtedly harmful, but people have subverted the objective of the colonial machine.

So go out, go pick up a cricket bat or head down to SFU’s cricket club to learn the sport because it is fun and entertaining!

Community members concerned about Conservative event at SFU

0
Protestors holding up signs
SCREENSHOT: Courtesy of Rebel News / YouTube

By: Mason Mattu, Section Editor

Content warning: mentions of residential school denialism, transphobia, child sexual abuse, pedophilia, and racism. 

Correction notice: A previous version of this article incorrectly referred to an attendee of the event as a protester. 

On March 6, Conservative member of parliament Jamil Jivani came to SFU Burnaby as part of his Restore the North tour. The tour is held across Canadian university campuses to discuss how attendees can help “restore the promise of Canada” with a conservative approach. Held in the Student Union Building (SUB), the SFU Conservative Club hosted Jivani and other prominent Conservative voices, including controversial member of parliament Aaron Gunn and BC Conservative Party leadership candidates Harman Banghu, Darrell Jones, and Kerry Lynne-Findlay.

The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) allowed the room to be booked by the campus Conservative Club, despite criticism from those in attendance. Protesters filled the space outside of the room in the SUB, holding signs that displayed slogans such as “Fuck fascism.”

Jivani is against diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and gender-affirming care for youth. Jivani has also been accused of anti-Blackness and racism, whereas Gunn has spread residential school denialism and been accused of using “transphobic, racist, and sexist rhetoric” by the New Democratic Party (NDP).  

“I don’t agree with the Conservative Party, but I’m not opposed to Conservative Party members speaking on campus,” one SFU student organizer, named Dina, told The Peak. “But I do have an issue with these individuals specifically,”

 “I think the viewpoint they’re pushing is fundamentally anti-democratic. It’s dangerous to marginalized communities.”

— Dina, SFU student organizer

She said that at the beginning of the event, protesters chanted, “Trans rights are human rights,” and claimed Jivani responded, “No.” The Peak could not independently verify this claim.

Jivani allegedly engaged in transphobic rhetoric against a transgender woman in the audience. We spoke to this audience member, Cecily, after the event took place. The Peak was not present at the event, and Cecily’s name has been changed to protect her identity.  

In her recollection of the events, Cecily said she asked Jivani the following question: “How is the Conservative Party’s platform [against child sexual abuse] consistent with your choice to meet with US President Donald Trump last month, who was heavily implicated in crimes of child sex trafficking and child rape?” Cecily added that she experienced child sexual abuse. Jivani visited Washington, DC, last month and met with Trump and other senior White House officials in an unsanctioned diplomatic mission in light of Canada’s trade war with the US. During that visit, Jivani accused Canada of having an anti-US “hissy fit.”Cecily claims that, in his response, Jivani said he was “not concerned about what’s happening in other countries.” 

When an attendee asked Jivani to apologize to Cecily later on in the event, Jivani allegedly “became irate,” pointed to her, and asked everyone to “take a look at this belligerent man.” 

Cecily told The Peak she reached out to the SFSS for support on this matter. She said she received a short update over a week after the fact, noting, “an investigation is currently underway.” 

“We had some dialogue with executives from the SFSS directly who told us that they disagreed with the views [of the speakers]. A couple of them made a speech at the beginning of the event about how they support marginalized communities,” Dina said. 

“There has to be a point where, in order to protect freedom and democracy, we have to draw a line somewhere.” Dina questioned the decision to approve the event, noting that the SFSS controls the SUB and the programming within it.

According to SFSS event space booking guidelines, the Society reserves the right to deny the booking of rooms for activities “contrary to SFSS policy, values, and guidelines.” In the SFSS’ issues policies, transphobia is listed as something which the Society aims to dismantle, alongside other forms of systemic oppression.

The Peak reached out to the SFSS for comment, but did not receive a response by the publication deadline. 

Banghu, a speaker at the event whose campaign was still active at the time, wrote this statement on X: “Leftist activists tried to shut us down. They called me and everyone in the room fascists, racists, and bigots. The truth is we were talking about the collapse of our economy, the future of Canada, and whether families will be able to build a life in this country.”

Federal NDP leadership candidate Tanille Johnston wrote in a statement to The Peak,

“Understandably, students are frustrated seeing Conservative politicians come to campus to recruit young organizers while pushing policies that don’t actually address the challenges young people are facing.”

— Tanille Johnston, NDP leadership candidate

Johnston ran against Gunn in the last federal election. “It’s especially troubling when those same politicians are the ones who have downplayed the undeniable harms from the residential school system.

“Universities should be places for engaging debate, but students have every right to call out politicians who spread racist narratives that strive to erase the painful truth of our shared history,” Johnston added. 

“This [event] was clearly not vetted. It began with a member of parliament implying that a protected class did not deserve human rights. The SFSS made the decision to allow this event to happen. I believe that they cannot claim neutrality in this issue — they need to either stand against dehumanizing language or for it,” Cecily said.  

The Peak reached out to the SFU Conservative Club, Jivani, Gunn, Banghu, and Jones for a comment on the event. We did not receive a response before the publication deadline. 

Cecily’s perspective was corroborated by another protester in attendance, alongside a recap video of the event posted to TikTok by the user @franann61. 

 

Family makes food special

0
a grandmother handing her grandson a piece of candy. The kid is happy.
ILLUSTRATION: Yan Ting Leung / The Peak

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer

When I was a kid, my grandmother would always try to sneak a piece of candy into my pocket, much to my parents’ dismay. Maybe for many people this story might sound trivial, maybe amusing. For me, it meant a great deal. The loving and thoughtful way my grandmother handed me those candies etched itself onto my memory of my childhood.

The bonds we have with the people we cherish can define how we see food. This is because food can connect people together, both to their past and to their future with new memories of bonding. Many people enjoy bonfires with loved ones. Maybe just a meal around a table. The food isn’t the centre of what makes that experience special; the effort and ambiance is what defines it.

When I still lived in Sri Lanka, my grandmother would make a nearly 30 minute daily trek to our house to make our family meals. Her menu, included rice, parippu, beans, chicken and more, wasn’t just delicious, but filled with so much love. If you were wondering if my grandmother’s habit of sneaking food only applied to candies, you would be dead wrong! She loved to sneak an extra egg or two into a meal. I think her dedication to feeding us speaks to a larger story. Food can be one element in how people show love, how people convey effort, and how people ultimately form bonds.

According to a study published in the National Library of Medicine, shared cooking and dining with family “positively influence family well-being.” This is through “strengthening emotional bonds, fostering communication and improving family cohesion.” This illustrates how critical the role your family or even the people you love can have on your relationship to food. Beyond the cuisine, it’s the routines you create through the process of making meals for your loved ones. 

This is something I think I can see with my own family. For example, Easter season has always been special for me since I was little. This is because, every year without fail, my father would bring home a chocolate Easter bunny home. This tradition is something that really defines my childhood.

In my native language of Sinhala, there is a saying: one raises a child like a flower. One has to constantly water, and protect their flower from the elements for a chance of survival and to nourish it. Food is a major aspect of this philosophy. Proper love, care, and attention to detail are essential to nourishment and survival. 

Perhaps many of us take for granted the personal connections that we have with our family or other people that make us feel safe through food.

I am thankful for all the memories I’ve had with my family around plates of food.

I think for a lot of people, these types of conversations shape who they become. For me, I can personally attribute a lot of those conversations to my parents and especially my grandmother. Though she isn’t here anymore, her endless dedication towards her family is something that has shaped me. I can only hope she attains Nibbana.

 

Mayorship is a responsibility

0
a black and white composite of two photos. One of Ken Sim, the mayor of Vancouver, making a phone call while sitting at a desk. The other is of city councillor Sean Orr, standing in front of the entrance to The Law Court, with a file in his hands.
PHOTOS: Courtesy of @seanorrofficial, @kensimcity / Instagram

By: Jonah Lazar, Staff Writer

Following the public outcry over the lack of transparency in the budget reshufflingthat will see about 400 Vancouverites lose their jobs in favour of lowering property taxes for the wealthymayor of Vancouver Ken Sim is once again in hot water. Vancouver city councillor, Sean Orr, has formally filed a defamation suit against Sim for spreading baseless accusations that he handed out “illegal drugs” in the streets of Vancouver. 

Sim made these comments at a Chinese-language media briefing in early February, when he claimed that Orr had been handing out “illegal drugs” in the streets of Vancouver on Christmas Day. A Better City, or ABC, councillor Lenny Zhou made similar comments weeks later on Chinese social media platform WeChat. The ABC party currently holds a majority in Vancouver’s city council, and is the party of mayor Sim. Orr, who has become one of the most outspoken critics of Sim and ABC, vehemently denied these accusations, labelling them “ridiculous” and “defamatory.” Orr had also pointed out that he wasn’t in Vancouver at the time. 

Orr’s disgust with these comments is well founded. A wholly fabricated public statement such as this coming from the mayor should not be brushed aside; it is an accusation of a very serious crime. This attack has significant ramifications for the public perception of the councillor. This fearmongering is a strategy straight out of the playbook of the MAGA movement south of the border, and is done to gain popular support by portraying Orr as a dangerous individual. Sim’s fabrications and Zhou’s subsequent translation to Mandarin make it seem as though they are deliberately misleading the Chinese Canadian voter base in Vancouver as we approach the October municipal election.

This latest stunt is yet another slap in the face in what is becoming a pattern of apathetic, selfish behaviour from Vancouver’s mayor. In his tumultuous three years at the helm, Sim’s behaviour has been a routine point of contention. Some noteworthy scandals to date include Sim missing over a third of council votes in his first year in office, secretly converting a city hall boardroom into a personal gym, and several code of conduct violations for repeated clashes with councillors and city officials. His declaration of October 3 as Chip Wilson Day celebrates the racist and fatphobic founder of Lululemon and is but a footnote in his long list of self-serving actions. 

Being the mayor of Vancouver is a privilege which necessitates a certain amount of professionalism in conduct, and Sim has repeatedly floundered under these expectations.

His continual lapses in judgment do nothing more to prove that he is staunchly out of touch with many Vancouverites. As we are approaching the municipal elections in October, it is crucial that citizens of Vancouver bear in mind the inappropriate actions of the incumbent mayor when casting their ballots. 

 

VIMFF: Extreme Ascents focuses in on perils of Everest

0
An illustration of a mountaineer climbing a snowy mountain shown on the big screen set in a theatre
ILLUSTRATION: Stella Laurino / The Peak

By: Jonah Lazar, Staff Writer

Content warning: mentions of death.

The Vancouver International Mountain Film Festival, or the VIMFF, has returned to the city for their spring festivities prior to taking the celebration on the road across Canada and the US. The festival spanned two weeks across a host of different cinemas, with each night focusing on different subject matters related to mountain sports. 

I attended the Extreme Ascents showing, expecting an evening of lighthearted, picturesque short films about mountain climbing, as this had been the motif when I attended last October. The North American premiere of the short film K2 Mon Amour, which detailed a French couple’s attempt to paraglide off the second-highest peak on Earth, fulfilled that expectation. Anna, a short memoir about mountaineer Anna Pfaff’s battle with frostbite on the peaks of Alaska, was also screened. However, this night took a darker turn due to the keynote presentation by alpinist and filmmaker Elia Saikaly.

Saikaly has had a 20-year career climbing and filming in the Himalayas — a career which has included five ascents of Everest. While this extensive career in the mountain climbing world has surely provided him with a host of positive, uplifting stories from the mountains, the focus of this presentation was not to sugarcoat the world’s highest points. In this career climbing Everest, Saikaly has witnessed the death of countless Sherpas (an ethnic group native to the Himalayas who have long worked as guides for Himalayan expeditions) and climbers. Deaths, in his mind, which often could have been preventable. 

Everest’s overcrowding crisis often captures international media attention, with sensationalized photos of lineups of climbers snaking their way up towards the summit, and climbers dying of hypothermia as others eager to reach the top pass them by. Saikaly argued that this crisis is far more nuanced than a simple case of traffic. Instead, Saikaly alluded to the blood being on the Nepalese government’s hands, as they have been giving inexperienced tour guides permission to lead expeditions up Everest — putting themselves and their clients in significant danger. “Traffic revealed the fault lines in the leadership,” he stated, before pointing to a photo of his friend Nihal Bagwan, who died during his descent after summiting Everest, and whose body Saikaly recovered later. 

Saikaly continued along this vein of death to explain that death is an integral part of the Everest experience, in that it creates an aura of danger and uncertainty around the mountain that helps maintain its notoriety among mountaineers. Through examples of bodies being filmed for internet fame by climbers and expedition leaders laughing at the deaths of their coworkers, he showed that a harrowing desensitization to death has plagued the Everest community. 

This presentation felt like a breath of fresh air for having not brushed aside death in the mountains as an inescapable fate for those who don’t make it back to base camp.

The mountaineering community, at times, seems to pride itself on the risks associated, and Saikaly’s insight and humanity provided a much-needed critical analysis as to why these deaths are so often overlooked. 

To conclude his presentation, Saikaly reflected on the need for accountability when deaths occur on Everest, and the need for consequences for those who play a part in causing or allowing for the deaths of climbers on the world’s tallest mountain.

Home, belonging, and marginalization at Dr. Umezurike’s book launch

0
A photo of Dr. Uchechukwu Umezurike
PHOTO: Courtesy of Dr. Uchechukwu Peter Umezurike

By: Maya Barillas Mohan, Staff Writer

Dr. Uchechukwu Umezurike, an English professor from the University of Calgary, came to SFU to share his new book. The SFU English department and the Institute for African and Black Diaspora Research and Engagement organized the launch. In the three-hour event, Umezurike celebrated his newly released book Masculinities in Nigerian Fiction: Receptivity and Gender. The Peak spoke with Umezurike to learn more. 

“I feel deeply elated by the reception and support my book has received so far.” Umezurike explained that his positionality as an African immigrant makes him “keenly aware of how diaspora shapes [his] sense of place, belonging, and relationality in this country.” As a part of the English faculty at UCalgary, his research that “encompasses the literature of Africa and the African Diaspora,” connected to his current project. The book addresses “home and belonging,” and how African Canadian writers can challenge a rhetoric which “deepens divisions and polarizes communities.”  

Masculinities in Nigerian Fiction: Receptivity and Gender analyzes some of Nigeria’s most well-known novels to understand their relationships of ethics and masculinity. “The book restates that what connects us most deeply is not social constructs but our common humanity,” Umezurike said. The book analyzes four novels that “portray characters who remain receptive to others’ pains, even as they challenge dominant norms and ideals of gender and sexuality,” and those “who identify with those living on the margins of society.” Through the examination of the “abused, abject, and outcast,” from these books, masculine identity can be redefined. Masculinities in Nigerian Fiction does “not engage with Canadian notions of gender and sexuality.

“We must learn to recognize and identify with the pain of others— regardless of gender or sexual identity.”

Dr. Uchechukwu Umezurike

As Masculinities in Nigerian Fiction “asks that we allow a sense of shared vulnerability to shape how we relate to one another,” Umezurike mused “one can extend this to the Canadian or global context.” In Calgary, he cherished “the warm and thoughtful conversations had with the graduate students at SFU.” This dialogue reminded Umezurike that we must “keep valuing and affirming the study of literature and the humanities.” 

When asked if literature complicates or simplifies attempts to understand multidimensional ideas which branch outside of linear experiences, Umezurike refuted the idea that literature “reveals how complex and layered these experiences are.” Literature “resists attempts to flatten our world into a formula,” and “asks us to think more deeply and compassionately about the many contours of human and nonhuman experiences.” 

Where Umezurike suggested “reality cannot be reduced to binary, simple categories, or neat conclusions,” we can read Masculinities in Nigerian Fiction to understand how “kinship can transcend oppressive social norms.”