Home Blog Page 1328

LAST WORD: New Wave

0

Idle No More #J11 march in Vancouver

Why we need movements like Idle No More

By Jessica Buffalo
Photos by Stephen Hui

A new wave of racism is gaining momentum as Idle No More activity continues across Canada.
“Reserves are Canada’s spoiled children,” read one counter-protestors’ sign in Edmonton.
“I am Ukrainian. I believe Ukrainians have the right to own and operate casinos. I demand that Harper meet with me to discuss how he is going to fund the casino. I will be starting my hunger strike today. I will restrict my intake to borscht and perogies until he meets with me,” read another. Ignorant remarks such as these have taken over online news websites, demonstrating the need to educate Canada on the vast range of Aboriginal issues that are pertinent to today’s political climate.

Canada entered into 11 numbered treaties with First Nations groups in the pre-confederation era, the first five of which were signed between 1871 and 1875. On top of that, there are also Comprehensive Land Claim (CLC) agreements — modern treaties starting in 1975 that cover issues unaddressed by the initial treaties — and the Vancouver Island Douglas Treaties, signed in the 1850s. In the latter, land was traded for a small amount of money and a large sum of blankets. In their essay Trespassers on the soil, Hamar Foster and Alan Grove point out that neither party understood each other’s language, which calls into question whether the signatory Chiefs understood that they were giving up the land “to the white people forever.” It is generally believed that the Chiefs understood that we are the caretakers of this land (land being an untransferable commodity) and signed the treaties in order to keep the peace.

In return for signing the first five treaties, the Canadian government promised the First Nations land, annual treaty money payments (usually $5 per person, not considering inflation), farming and hunting equipment, and help with building crucial infrastructures. The sixth Treaty, signed in 1876, differed a bit from the others because of the coinciding depletion of the buffalo and the arrival of smallpox. Poundmaker and Big Bear, both Cree Chiefs, initially resisted signing the treaties. However, because the buffalo were disappearing at an astounding rate, they were eventually forced to sign the treaties or face the starvation of their people. It also differed from the previous treaties in that it included a health care provision.

In order to help all of the country’s municipalities, the Canadian government’s Strategic Infrastructure Fund allocated a total of $4.3 billion dollars to all provinces, territories, and some First Nations communities. Cities like Calgary and Edmonton were given $75 million each to maintain their roads, while Vancouver was allocated $450 million for the Canada line. Toronto received $25 million for the Canadian Opera Company, $25 million for the Toronto International Film Festival Centre, and $27 million for the soccer stadium, as well as $350 million for transportation. However, when it came to Aboriginal communities, Nunavut only received $20 million for housing infrastructure, and the First Nations satellite Society for Emergency Services was allocated $7.9 million. There was also the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, which provided $4 billion to rehabilitate crucial infrastructures such as waste water, water, transit, culture, and community services. So, when communities such as Attawapiskat or Kashechewan declare housing and water crises, they have valid reasons to be upset. Could you imagine Vancouver not having enough funding to produce clean water?

“If you don’t have water then build a well,” read one comment on the CBC’s website following a story on Chief Theresa Spence’s hunger strike. Can you build a well? I turn on my taps and water comes out; if it doesn’t, then I’m screwed. I possess neither the tools nor the knowledge to build a well because I’m not expected to build a well and neither are these communities.

Counter-movements such as the Assembly of Second Nations against Aboriginal Racism (ANSAAR) are full of anti-aboriginal messages hidden as calls for equality. “End chronic Native dependency and despair and the historic wasting of tax monies in Canada,” calls one petition on their Facebook page. This is one of the biggest misconceptions surrounding Aboriginal funding. Many commentators on the ASNAAR page stated that they were “sick of their tax dollars going to support welfare natives.” Canada’s Aboriginal population is approximately 3.8 per cent or 1.2 million people. Canada’s population on welfare is 1,679,800. Of course, not every single aboriginal person is on welfare; even if hypothetically they were, there would still be about 500,000 non-aboriginals that the taxpayer would be taking care of. Welfare and social assistance programs are not just limited to people living in municipalities. If a registered Aboriginal person, living on a reserve, meets the requirements, they are entitled to receive social assistance. What these commentators don’t seem to realize is that most aboriginal people are the “tax-payer” as well. The only way an Aboriginal person bypasses federal and provincial taxes is by working on their reserve, and/or purchasing goods on a reserve. Non-aboriginal people on welfare are the same as aboriginal people on welfare, except that aboriginal people get five dollars more a year in treaty payments. The funding for aboriginal people comes from a trust, where money was derived from land claim settlements, oil and gas revenues, and fine payments. The trust is maintained by the government and is replenished through interest.

I found most of this information online. It is available to everyone. Ignorance is no longer an excuse. If you want to know more about First Nations issues and why grassroots movements such as Idle No More exist, then go to a teach-in. Aboriginal leaders, academics, and native youth all attend these events in order to help people understand the issues behind the movement. Thanks to technology, you can even access them online from sites like spreecast.

Please, stop perpetuating ignorance and racism and get out there and get educated so you can ask the questions that actually matter. As for the Ukrainian who is on a perogie and borscht hunger strike: you might want to come up with a business plan and pitch it to the government for a stimulus infrastructure loan.

Idle No More movement surges into BC

1

Idle No More #J11 march in Vancouver

Last Monday saw another day of action that swept across the country

By Munatsi Mavhima and Alison Roach
Photos by Stephen Hui

Approximately 250 protesters of the popular Idle No More movement gathered once more in downtown Vancouver last Monday, congregating outside the Native Education College and marching to the Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development building at Melville and Thurlow. The event was part of an international day of action that saw gatherings in more than 25 Canadian cities and towns, as well as similar protests and rallies taking place in the US, France, and Greenland.

The day also saw an estimated 300 protesters mark the MP’s return to the House of Commons with a march on Parliament Hill. Assembly of First Nations national chief Shawn Atleo spoke to the crowd at the event, saying, “This is a moment in history when change arrives. You are the change that we’ve been waiting for.”

Protestors with Idle No More have been spotted throughout Vancouver in the past month, handing out information outside the Rogers Arena before the Canucks’ season opener, and as they joined several hundred activists outside the Sheraton Wall Centre hotel on the night of Jan. 14, where the Northern Gateway pipeline hearings were being held.

The movement also made its way to Vancouver Island, as several hundred protesters shut down the Pat Bay Highway — which connects the Victoria International airport with the Swartz Bay ferry terminal — and to the north of the province, where over 100 from Gitwangak First Nation blocked a CN Rail line east of Terrace.

Both events ocurred on Jan. 16 as part of another day of action that saw rallies occurring throughout the country, with protesters stalling railway lines and blocking highways between Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal. Idle No More is a grassroots movement started by four female activists in Saskatchewan, and has come to centre-stage in Canadian politics and current affairs.

As reported by CBC, the movement’s mission statement “Calls on all people to join in a revolution which honours and fulfils Indigenous sovereignty which protects the land and water.” The movement was started in response to the federal Bill C-45, which passed just before Christmas. The bill overhauls Canada’s Navigable Waters Protection Act, and significantly affects tribal authority over Canadian waterways. “Idle No More is a reassertion of native sovereignty in our country,” said Chris Darimont, professor at University of Victoria Geography Department and science director for Raincoast Conservation in an interview with Outside, “and also a signal of very deep unrest with the federal government’s incredibly brazen attempts to demolish environmental protection.”

According to the movement’s official website, “Idle No More has a responsibility to resist current government policies in a Peaceful and Respectful way. It can be done. It can be done without aggression or violence. This is an energetic, exciting and transformative time.” In an interview with The Peak, SFU professor of archaeology Dr. Eldon Yellowhorn commented, “People take the initiative on their own to make a demonstration and round up people for the demonstration . . . [so] to see something coordinated across the country hasn’t really been successfully tried before. This is a unique event.”

This communal effort is echoed by Elder Alma Brooks, a member of the Maliseet Grand Council, who at an Idle No More information event stated, “We’re struggling to make sure that our culture, our rights and our identity continues to exist. We have a right to exist as people; as distinct people.”

University Briefs – February 4, 2013

0

By Amara Janssens

UVic study finds strength training can help stroke recovery
Researchers at the University of Victoria have found that the cross education effect (strength-training a muscle group on one side of the body strengthening the same muscle group on the other side) is beneficial after someone has a stroke. By strength training one side of their lower body, stroke patients can improve their strength on their weak lower side by about 30 percent. This phenomenon is a result of small changes that occur in the spinal cord, and reflex pathways of the brain. One possible reason for this is that a stroke could reveal connections between all parts of the body that exist, but are not noticed when the body is healthy.

With files from The Martlet

Langara student killed in sword attack
Vancouver’s first homicide victim of 2013 was 19-year-old Manraj Akalirai, a criminology student at Langara College. Akalirai was allegedly swarmed by a group of men while in his vehicle. The group allegedly smashed out the back window of the vehicle and pulled Akalirai onto the street, where he was attacked with clubs, bats and a sword. Police have arrested five men in connection with the murder, and a sixth is being questioned. Police believe the murder may be connected to gang activity, however Akalirai’s family deny these claims.

With files from The Voice

Burst water main floods McGill

On Jan. 28, a water main broke in downtown Montreal during a construction mishap. At McGill University, several buildings were flooded and evacuated, cancelling all evening classes. A group of engineering students working in the engineering lab noticed the water approaching and quickly built a dam of garbage bags filled with snow. “At crux of it, we’re all engineers. We like building dams,” Cyrille Goldstein, a U2 mechanical engineering student said to The Daily. McGill administrators are assessing the damage and say it will be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

With files from The Daily

SFU, Surrey Memorial poised to become medical technology leaders

0

WEB-Ryan Darcy-Vaikunthe Banerjee

Newly appointed BC Leadership Chair will work with SFU, Surrey Memorial, Fraser Health

By Alison Roach
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

The appointment of Dr. Ryan D’Arcy to the BC Leadership Chair was announced last Tuesday at SFU Surrey, along with the launch of a $5.25 million Surrey Memorial Hospital Foundation BC Leadership Chair in Multimodal Technology for Healthcare Innovation.

The Leadership Chair will link SFU’s Faculty of Applied Sciences, Surrey Memorial, and Fraser Health, in a project that will aim to improve the lives of patients through innovation by combining the institutions’ various expertise in research, technology, and clinical experience.

The Chair position is a product of a partnership with the government’s Leading Edge Endowment Fund, which has given $2.25 million, and SFU and Surrey Memorial Hospital Foundation, each contributing $1.5 million. Lab space is being developed by Fraser Health Authority to house the Chair position, combined with access to clinical facilities and research at Surrey Memorial Hospital.

In an interview with The Peak, D’Arcy emphasized that he is looking forward to working in Surrey, with the potential for innovation there. “I think what’s going on in Surrey is remarkable,” D’Arcy said. “All of this is going to come together to do research that helps patients, that’s very patient oriented, and focused on improving the outcomes of patients.”

SFU president Andrew Petter was in attendance at the announcement Tuesday morning, and commented in a news release, “The support of the province’s Leading Edge Endowment Fund has enabled SFU to forge a unique partnership with Surrey memorial Hospital Foundation, and to bring a world-class innovator in medical technologies to BC.”

A BC native, D’Arcy specializes in brain imaging, brain disease and disorders, and medical technologies. D’Arcy previously worked for 10 years as a neuroscientist at the Institute for Biodiagnostics in Halifax, an internationally known lab that he helped to establish. There, he worked to take neuroimaging and medical imaging and embed it into the main hospitals in Halifax, as well as teach medical students about imaging in a hospital environment.

The Institute also worked on advanced MRI technology and encephalography, which involves monitoring brains waves using their electrical or magnetic signatures. “We would then use these to look at better ways to advance neurologic diagnosis [for] brain diseases and disorders like ones that many people know of; strokes, alzheimer’s, that sort of thing,” explained D’Arcy.

This work led D’Arcy to develop devices that could be taken outside the hospital environment in order to treat brain injury in the sites where it occurs, such as hockey rinks, football fields, and ski hills. “If you’re in those hockey rinks right now, for your heart you’ll see AEDs — Automatic External Defibrillators — and that of course brings the technology to the site where the patients need it. I think the same should be true for the brain. If you have a problem with your brain, you should have technology there to help you right away.”

“The drive is going to start out of this partnership [between] Simon Fraser and Surrey Memorial,” he continued, “The goal is to make it an international leader. I was just in a meeting where everyone agrees we’re not here to win the provincials, we’re here to win the Olympics.”

The project will also give a select group of SFU students the opportunity to work with D’Arcy in medical technology labs at Surrey Memorial, as well as at the university analyzing medical imaging data.

The main goal of the research remains focused on improving care and treatment for patients with brain injury and brain conditions. “The work I’ve done isn’t cure for the disease,” said D’Arcy, “It’s using medical technology to help patients now.”

SFU is not supportive of students’ mental health

2

sfu mental health illust

Even with a doctor’s note, you may be expected to complete your course

By Tara Nykyforiak
Illustration by Ben Buckley

Throughout this past year of study at SFU, I have concluded our university is overall unsupportive of students dealing with mental health situations. This lack of support and compassion spans both SFU’s academic procedures and student requirements.

A friend of mine recently gathered the courage to speak to their doctor about their struggle with depression. This was after a sustained period of social withdrawal and a significant decrease in his academic performance. His doctor was accepting and sympathetic, and encouraged him to speak with someone at SFU.

His professors also proved caring and willing to discuss possible courses of action, but when directed to speak with our university’s academic advisors, the compassionate acknowledgment came to an end.

My friend, upon advice from their professors, wished to acceptably withdraw from their courses so as to re-take them the following semester. Despite their doctor’s recommendation and the recommendation of their professors, my friend was told by the advisor to continue with their courses and write their exams, because the process concerning “Withdrawals Under Extenuating Circumstances” takes six to eight weeks and is not guaranteed.

My initial impression of the situation was anger. I believe that my friend struggling with depression, a condition affecting 10 per cent of Canadians according to the Canadian Mental Health Association, should not be compartmentalized under “extenuating circumstances.”

In a population of 33,476,688, 3.3 million Canadians experience a form of depression in their lifetime. To merely categorize mental health conditions as “extenuating circumstances” is not only ignorant of the reality of the mental health situation of Canada, but unfair to those who are courageous enough to seek out the help of professionals. Not enough effort is made to acknowledge and accommodate the mental health difficulties experienced by tuition-paying students.

Individuals like my friend have the documentation for withdrawal, but have not been given the attention they warrant. Their letters from medical professionals are not respected if they are still required to wait six to eight weeks for their situation to be assessed. Thus, it seems SFU doesn’t support personal mental health difficulties, nor feel that the mental health conditions of students is a priority. At present, my friend is functionally unable to withdraw from their classes. Because there is no guarantee they will receive the permission to acceptably withdraw, they are forced to write exams that they were advised by their doctor and their professors not to write.

The situational judgement of professors used to be considered, but has since been centralized into a committee not directly involved with the students they are assessing. Their marks, as a result, will not be a genuine reflection of their knowledge or capabilities as a student.

It’s unfortunate that the very educational institution that professes to engage the world voluntarily ignores the mental health struggles of the students who support it.

SFU is not supportive of students' mental health

0

sfu mental health illust

Even with a doctor’s note, you may be expected to complete your course

By Tara Nykyforiak
Illustration by Ben Buckley

Throughout this past year of study at SFU, I have concluded our university is overall unsupportive of students dealing with mental health situations. This lack of support and compassion spans both SFU’s academic procedures and student requirements.

A friend of mine recently gathered the courage to speak to their doctor about their struggle with depression. This was after a sustained period of social withdrawal and a significant decrease in his academic performance. His doctor was accepting and sympathetic, and encouraged him to speak with someone at SFU.

His professors also proved caring and willing to discuss possible courses of action, but when directed to speak with our university’s academic advisors, the compassionate acknowledgment came to an end.

My friend, upon advice from their professors, wished to acceptably withdraw from their courses so as to re-take them the following semester. Despite their doctor’s recommendation and the recommendation of their professors, my friend was told by the advisor to continue with their courses and write their exams, because the process concerning “Withdrawals Under Extenuating Circumstances” takes six to eight weeks and is not guaranteed.

My initial impression of the situation was anger. I believe that my friend struggling with depression, a condition affecting 10 per cent of Canadians according to the Canadian Mental Health Association, should not be compartmentalized under “extenuating circumstances.”

In a population of 33,476,688, 3.3 million Canadians experience a form of depression in their lifetime. To merely categorize mental health conditions as “extenuating circumstances” is not only ignorant of the reality of the mental health situation of Canada, but unfair to those who are courageous enough to seek out the help of professionals. Not enough effort is made to acknowledge and accommodate the mental health difficulties experienced by tuition-paying students.

Individuals like my friend have the documentation for withdrawal, but have not been given the attention they warrant. Their letters from medical professionals are not respected if they are still required to wait six to eight weeks for their situation to be assessed. Thus, it seems SFU doesn’t support personal mental health difficulties, nor feel that the mental health conditions of students is a priority. At present, my friend is functionally unable to withdraw from their classes. Because there is no guarantee they will receive the permission to acceptably withdraw, they are forced to write exams that they were advised by their doctor and their professors not to write.

The situational judgement of professors used to be considered, but has since been centralized into a committee not directly involved with the students they are assessing. Their marks, as a result, will not be a genuine reflection of their knowledge or capabilities as a student.

It’s unfortunate that the very educational institution that professes to engage the world voluntarily ignores the mental health struggles of the students who support it.

The Oh Wells are packed with sugar and spice

0

WEB-theohwells1-Christine Macavoy

Quirkiness is found in the form of diary entries and ukuleles

By Daryn Wright
Photos by Christine Mcavoy

I meet Sarah Jickling, face and anchor of the band The Oh Wells, in Kafka’s coffee house. The place is full of people loudly playing board games and chatting over strong coffees. We sip green tea as she tells me about the dance class she’ll be attending in an hour.

“It’s actually a burlesque class!” She says excitedly. This, as I find out, is not something she would ever have dreamed of doing four or five years ago, but the existence of The Oh Wells changed that.

Tenth-grade Jickling was shy and mostly kept to herself, but when her and a friend started
making music as a hobby, things began to change dramatically. “We decided to put some of the songs that we wrote online. This was over winter break in grade eleven, and over that winter break, our song circulated around the Facebook community of our high school. When we came back, people were stopping us in the hallways and saying ‘I love your band,’ ” she recalls. “It changed our lives. At first it was just a hobby, and not something I’d ever think of doing full time, but we got really good reactions from people right away and we kept getting those good reactions.”

About a year ago, The Oh Wells made it into the Peak Performance Project, and around this time things within the band began to shift. All the original members of the band, leftover from high school, decided that this wasn’t what they wanted to do — all but Sarah.

I begged to be accepted as a solo artist,” she says. Since then, the members of the band have fluctuated constantly, each person contributing a little something unique to the project. “Over the period of having so many band members, our sound has changed. We’ve had pop-punk songs, we’ve had afro-pop songs, and we’ve had some rock songs. I don’t like to confine myself to one genre,” she says.

This movement between genres in The Oh Well’s music is quite evident; in some songs, Jickling is strumming away on a ukelele, and in others a tinkling piano accompanies her enthusiastic and wavery vocals. One thing is clear, though: The Oh Wells are quirky. “I really admire a lot of British musicians, like Kate Nash and Lily Allen,” she says. Certainly, the honest, clever lyrics and poppy instrumentals are corollary to Lily Allen’s own playful, sometimes old-timey tunes.

Honesty is perhaps the most important element for Jickling: “Is it Too Late to Apologize?” begins with the confession “I’m sorry I’m not that girl from Transformers.” Her confessional lyrics have been described as “like a diary,” and this is perhaps why The Oh Wells feels like a best friend. “I’ve had people write to me to tell me ‘You describe exactly how I’m feeling right now, so thank you.’ That’s exactly what I’m trying to do: create a relatable experience for people,” she says.

When honesty is her driving policy, and the subjects of her songs revolve around exbest friends and ex-boyfriends, things can get emotional for her onstage.

“There are moments on stage when I’m holding back tears. When I’m writing [the songs] I’m really in the moment, so if I see somebody [familiar], or I’m in a place that reminds me of somebody and I’m singing a song about them, sometimes it takes me back,” she explains. This is why she also admires people like Tina Fey, who uses personal experience and honesty to really engage with the audience.

“That’s something I like to do in my music as well. I’m by no means a comedian, but we use the same tools for different goals: mine is to make people dance, and hers is to make people laugh.”

It is perhaps this honest, quirky quality that makes The Oh Wells so refreshing. Jickling’s strong vocals and multi-faceted instrumentals make every song an exciting experience, akin to walking into a colourful bakery: each morsel is sweeter than the last.

The Mat Pack finish on top

0

WEB-wrestling girls-mark burnham

SFU women defeat OCU to capture first ever WCWA team championship

By Clay J. Gray
Photos by Mark Burnham

With only two matches left in the WCWA National Championships, SFU’s women’s wrestling team-trailed the Oklahoma City University Stars by one point. Both head-to-head showdowns were between SFU and OCU, rematches from January’s national dual championship.

This time was different, though: each wrestler had fought their way through their individual bracket in search of personal glory and the elusive overall team title.

The WCWA National tournament had begun the day before with over 300 wrestlers from 17 schools spread out over 10 weight classes, and after two days of competition, SFU had six athletes in the finals. While each competitor was in pursuit of an individual honour, there was also a team title at stake. Athletes gained team points based on their final standings, the top eight scored between 16 points for first place and one point for eighth.

The tournament had become a two-horse race before the finals started; OCU was the point leader but only had five athletes in the finals, and three of those matches were against an SFU wrestler. As the finals began, the tension in the gym was palpable, since OCU had been the only school to win this tournament in its history.

With SFU in a position to topple the four-time reigning champions, the entire gym jumped on the Clan bandwagon. “One of the wrestlers from another school had gone through and got the whole gym to chant ‘Go Jenna Go!’ ” said SFU’s Jenna McLatchy, recalling her finals match. “It was
one of the most exciting finals I’ve ever seen. I’ve never had a national championship where it came down to the last match,” said head coach Mike Jones.

Although SFU had six wrestlers in the finals, the other four members of the team had also grappled their way through the tournament in search of team points. 101-pounder Darby Huckle and 116-pounder Nikkie Brar had both placed third. Laura Gordon placed seventh at 136 pounds while Laura Wilson fell short of All-American status. When asked about the athletes not in the finals, Jones said, “Even though Brar didn’t win the tournament, she had one of the most outstanding performances on the team. She lost her first match and then came back to win six bouts in a row, four of which went to the third period and could have gone either way.” The first weight class in the finals produced an OCU champion in Emily Webster and pushed SFU’s championships dreams a little further away. However, the Clan’s Victoria Anthony responded by taking a title of her own.

Another OCU wrestler, Joey Miller, won the next weight class, putting SFU in a must win position for their remaining five matches. 130-pounder Helen Maroulis was on deck to compete. Maroulis took the match in two rounds and began close the gap between the Clan and the Stars.

The Clan’s third finalist Sidney Morrison was the first of the three head-to-head match ups between SFU and OCU. Morrison dropped the first round 0–1 but bounced back to take the second round 3–1 and dominated the third round 6–0 for the win. SFU’s Danielle Lappage was next to step on the mat, facing an opponent from King’s College Tennessee. Lappage pocketed her own individual title in two rounds, narrowing the point spread to one.

As the Clan’s Justina DiStasio marched onto the mat, the team score was OCU 109 to SFU’s 108. DiStasio’s match was the second SFU-OCU showdown, and was as tight as possible. The first round went to a sudden death clinch with DiStasio winning the draw and getting to start with the leg, round 1–0 Justina.

The second round saw the same result, another 1–0 clinch in favour of DiStasio. The victory gave SFU their first lead of the tournament but with only a three-point difference OCU could still thwart the Clan’s dream with a win at heavyweight. With the team title on the line, McLatchy strode into the spotlight to battle OCU’s Heather O’Conner for the fourth time that year. O’Conner scored the first takedown of the match but McLatchy responded quickly with a takedown of her own, and took the advantage in the first round.

With 10 seconds left, O’Conner hit a three-point takedown to win the round 4–1. The second round saw McLatchy hit the mat with new determination as she denied O’Conner from scoring a single point, tying the match at one round apiece. In the third and final round, McLatchy scored a takedown in the first 30 seconds, taking a 1–0 lead. After the referee brought the wrestlers back to their feet, McLatchy hit a three-point takedown with 30 second left in the match, and a 4–0 lead the Clan’s National Championship seemed within reach.

A last ditch effort by O’Conner garnered her one point in the round but not the victory. As McLatchy rose from the mat to get her hand raised as an individual champion, the SFU team bench exploded from their seats in an outpour of joy and celebration at capturing their first ever WCWA team championship.

My Mother’s Caregiver: Looking After a Parent with early-inset Alzheimer’s

0

Written By Joanne Cave
Illustrated byEleanor Qu

OTTAWA (CUP) – Some of my university peers are motivated by grades, future salaries, or parental pressure. I’m motivated by something else: the desire to make something of myself early enough in my life so that mom will remember it.

When your mom loses her memory
Fall 2011 marked the start of a particularly rough semester. It was the first of my third year at the University of Toronto. It was not rough in the sense of having too many readings and not enough time; it was rough in the sense of very unexpectedly breaking up with your boyfriend, getting 60 days’ notice from your landlord, and starting to realize that your mom is losing her memory.

It started to click over Thanksgiving. I tearfully arrived at the Toronto airport after sleeping in and missing my flight home to Edmonton for the long weekend. Booking a later flight, I was so excited to spend time relaxing at home with my parents as a respite from the difficult semester I’d been going through. On the flight, I thought about my mom’s homemade pumpkin pie and elaborate turkey dinner with a feeling of relief and satisfaction.

What I wasn’t prepared for were the very visible signs of early-onset Alzheimer’s I noticed in my mom, the woman I had always known as an adept, busy wife and working mother. Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive, degenerative disorder that attacks the brain’s nerve cells. The damage results in loss of memory, thinking and language skills, not to mention behavioral changes.

That day, I had to drive to the grocery store three times; my mom kept forgetting to add items to her list and I was sent out to get them. This time it was for cranberry sauce. “The doctor doesn’t want her to drive anymore,” my dad quietly told me.

Pulling into the grocery store’s parking lot, I unexpectedly burst into tears. This wasn’t the mom I knew. I had never needed to take care of the woman who had always taken such good care of me. I made another 10 trips to the grocery store that weekend alone. At the time, there was no diagnosis, but we knew for sure something was not right.

Throughout my visit, I learned about her coping mechanisms. During the day, when my dad was at work, my mom would follow a specific routine to comfort herself. She would take local transit with her favourite bus driver, who would drop her off at the familiar grocery store. All of the cashiers knew her by name and had memorized our home phone number. When she shopped, she did so almost mechanically — saying hello to the cashiers, picking up ingredients for the same rotation of three to four dinners, and then once again boarding the bus. I caught her preparing dinner at 3 p.m., simply to have something to do.

Later that weekend, as my parents and I watched the late night news together, my mom turned to my dad. “Where are you sleeping tonight?”
she asked him, sounding slightly dazed. My dad and I, as would become typical, exchanged startled looks. He grinned.

“I was hoping to sleep beside you — like I have for the past 20 years?” On the drive back to the airport that weekend, my dad explained to me he had been noticing the symptoms for some time and was ready to take my mom to a geriatric specialist. My usual excitement to return back to school after a holiday break was replaced with an excruciating sense of guilt.

A change of priorities
The following summer, I sat across from my mom on the patio of our favorite cafe, eating lunch. By that point she had been tested and officially diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s.

“This is so nice,” she said, smiling at me. “This is just so nice. We like this place, don’t we? What a nice place. I don’t think I’ve ever been here before.” The depth of our conversations has changed dramatically since she first started showing signs of Alzheimer’s. Our chats are often quite circular, with my mom repeating thoughts and stories multiple times. My dad and I talk politics; my mom and I talk about the weather.

The symptoms of dementia and Alzheimer’s are complex and not restricted to memory loss. My mom sometimes struggles to solve simple problems, rationalize situations, plan sequences of time, participate in social settings without anxiety or confusion, and find appropriate words to complete sentences. On multiple occasions, she has gotten lost in public places, or doesn’t remember where she is or why she came there. Some days, simple daily tasks are nearly impossible for her to complete independently.

My credit card statements have started to show more flights home and fewer clothes and impulse purchases. I spend less time on Facebook and more time on the phone with my parents. But it doesn’t matter to me — nothing could be more important than visiting my parents in person to see how my mom is doing. At this point, going home only once in every four months is too large and distressing of a gap to handle. The next Thanksgiving — one year after initially noticing symptoms of Alzheimer’s in my mom — I returned home once again. My entire family now knew about my mom’s condition and was quietly sympathetic.

This year, I helped my mom prepare Thanksgiving dinner, made decisions about what to start cooking first, and ensured we had all the ingredients we needed. I took her shopping, for walks around the neighbourhood, and to visit our friends and family. While I often feel the need to apologize on her behalf — her not-yet-greying hair doesn’t help to explain her confusion or disorientation — I realize it’s not an apology anyone should have to make.

My mom is happy, but shows signs of anxiety and frustration during the brief moments when she starts to realize the loss of agency in her own life. What’s particularly scary is that my family can’t seem to convey a lasting understanding to my mom about her condition. She expresses frustration with her doctors, often unable to understand why they ask her so many questions or make certain recommendations. My dad helps to mediate those conversations, but my mom has started to sense that she’s living partially in the dark.

Dementia & Alzheimer’s in Canada
Maybe your grandparents are starting to show signs of dementia or Alzheimer’s, or you currently act as an informal caregiver for another family member facing a degenerative condition or disease.

According to the Alzheimer’s Society of Canada, nearly 750,000 Canadians currently live with dementia or Alzheimer’s, and this number will increase to nearly 1.5 million by 2031. Canadian policy makers are expressing concern that the Canadian health-care system will not be able to keep up with the increasing caregiving demands of an aging population. Unlike many degenerative physical conditions, much of the support and treatment for
individuals living with dementia or Alzheimer’s often rests with their families instead of the formal health-care system.

In 2011, family caregivers in Canada spent 444 million unpaid hours caring for loved ones with dementia according to the Alzheimer’s Society of Canada. The effects are particularly profound for young caregivers. Ottawa’s Vanier Institute of the Family reports that many children of parents with degenerative conditions face increased stress and anxiety, social isolation, and a sense of resentment about their caregiving responsibilities.

Much like my struggle to decide where to move after graduation or how I should balance time between academics and family, young caregivers can sometimes feel like their choices or opportunities are compromised because of a deep sense of family obligation. This experience has undoubtedly forced me to grow up much more quickly than my move across the country for university did.

Thinking about the future
I’ve always known, through a strange mix of anxiety and teenage embarrassment, that my parents were getting older. My dad, in his early seventies, still works as a heavy-duty mechanic after recovering from two major heart attacks. My mom, in her early sixties, had been encouraged into early retirement because of her inability to keep up with the pace of her workplace.

It became especially daunting when my parents sat me down in our living room to talk about their wills and retirement savings. I quickly did the math in my head. I’m 20, my mom is 60. I’ll hopefully have a decade before my brother and I need to start thinking about home care or assisted-living facilities for our parents. That’s a decade I’ll have before the guilt and sense of family obligation kicks in fully — that sense of obligation that pushes me to move closer to my parents and settle there longterm, to get the travel bug out of my system, and to start making “adult” choices.

I want and need my mom to be lucid enough to see me receive a Master’s degree, land a career, get married, have children and lead a happy and successful life. It is a difficult compromise: my sense of independence and newfound adulthood versus my growing sense of obligation to be my mom’s informal caregiver. It’s also a difficult reality to explain to my friends — if it’s even a familiar situation to them, it’s something they experience more distantly with their grandparents.

At an age when we are repeatedly told that our futures are ours and ours alone, it feels strange to start making decisions around someone other than myself. Should I move home after I graduate? How long should I plan on living with my parents? What if I decide to go to graduate school abroad and my mom’s condition deteriorates?

Moving forward
So, is the situation only going to get worse? Is my future as child of a parent with degenerative conditions destined to be one of compromise, sadness and grief? I have no choice but to come to terms with what will be a very uncertain future.

My mom teaches me to live every day with patience, grace, and a deep sense of caring. To have a relationship with my mom as she is today, without using my childhood as a point of comparison, is a true exercise in humility, maturity and compassion.

For years, my mom did so much to make sure our family was happy and cared for. She moved my brother and me to Edmonton so we could attend better schools than what was available in rural northern Alberta. For years, we commuted two hours each way every weekend to visit my dad.

She returned to the workforce after being a stay-at-home mom to help save for our university education. She listened to my trivial teenage-girl problems with a sense of gentleness and understanding unmatched by anyone. While her memory will fade, there is something that won’t — her deep sense of respect and investment in the wellbeing of her family.

It’s easy to grieve for what feels like a life-changing and unexpected loss, or to fear the day my mom won’t remember who I am. To only miss the person my mom once was feels dehumanizing, and doesn’t do her current self justice. It’s also easy to be angry — not at anyone in particular, but at a circumstance that is both heartbreaking and deeply infuriating.

In some ways, I have been robbed of my mother. She can’t give me the rational, adult advice about graduate-school programs or future next steps that my friends’ parents can provide with ease.

Sooner than I ever imagined this would happen, I am my mother’s caregiver — and that’s okay.

My Mother's Caregiver: Looking After a Parent with early-inset Alzheimer's

0

Written By Joanne Cave
Illustrated byEleanor Qu

OTTAWA (CUP) – Some of my university peers are motivated by grades, future salaries, or parental pressure. I’m motivated by something else: the desire to make something of myself early enough in my life so that mom will remember it.

When your mom loses her memory
Fall 2011 marked the start of a particularly rough semester. It was the first of my third year at the University of Toronto. It was not rough in the sense of having too many readings and not enough time; it was rough in the sense of very unexpectedly breaking up with your boyfriend, getting 60 days’ notice from your landlord, and starting to realize that your mom is losing her memory.

It started to click over Thanksgiving. I tearfully arrived at the Toronto airport after sleeping in and missing my flight home to Edmonton for the long weekend. Booking a later flight, I was so excited to spend time relaxing at home with my parents as a respite from the difficult semester I’d been going through. On the flight, I thought about my mom’s homemade pumpkin pie and elaborate turkey dinner with a feeling of relief and satisfaction.

What I wasn’t prepared for were the very visible signs of early-onset Alzheimer’s I noticed in my mom, the woman I had always known as an adept, busy wife and working mother. Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive, degenerative disorder that attacks the brain’s nerve cells. The damage results in loss of memory, thinking and language skills, not to mention behavioral changes.

That day, I had to drive to the grocery store three times; my mom kept forgetting to add items to her list and I was sent out to get them. This time it was for cranberry sauce. “The doctor doesn’t want her to drive anymore,” my dad quietly told me.

Pulling into the grocery store’s parking lot, I unexpectedly burst into tears. This wasn’t the mom I knew. I had never needed to take care of the woman who had always taken such good care of me. I made another 10 trips to the grocery store that weekend alone. At the time, there was no diagnosis, but we knew for sure something was not right.

Throughout my visit, I learned about her coping mechanisms. During the day, when my dad was at work, my mom would follow a specific routine to comfort herself. She would take local transit with her favourite bus driver, who would drop her off at the familiar grocery store. All of the cashiers knew her by name and had memorized our home phone number. When she shopped, she did so almost mechanically — saying hello to the cashiers, picking up ingredients for the same rotation of three to four dinners, and then once again boarding the bus. I caught her preparing dinner at 3 p.m., simply to have something to do.

Later that weekend, as my parents and I watched the late night news together, my mom turned to my dad. “Where are you sleeping tonight?”
she asked him, sounding slightly dazed. My dad and I, as would become typical, exchanged startled looks. He grinned.

“I was hoping to sleep beside you — like I have for the past 20 years?” On the drive back to the airport that weekend, my dad explained to me he had been noticing the symptoms for some time and was ready to take my mom to a geriatric specialist. My usual excitement to return back to school after a holiday break was replaced with an excruciating sense of guilt.

A change of priorities
The following summer, I sat across from my mom on the patio of our favorite cafe, eating lunch. By that point she had been tested and officially diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s.

“This is so nice,” she said, smiling at me. “This is just so nice. We like this place, don’t we? What a nice place. I don’t think I’ve ever been here before.” The depth of our conversations has changed dramatically since she first started showing signs of Alzheimer’s. Our chats are often quite circular, with my mom repeating thoughts and stories multiple times. My dad and I talk politics; my mom and I talk about the weather.

The symptoms of dementia and Alzheimer’s are complex and not restricted to memory loss. My mom sometimes struggles to solve simple problems, rationalize situations, plan sequences of time, participate in social settings without anxiety or confusion, and find appropriate words to complete sentences. On multiple occasions, she has gotten lost in public places, or doesn’t remember where she is or why she came there. Some days, simple daily tasks are nearly impossible for her to complete independently.

My credit card statements have started to show more flights home and fewer clothes and impulse purchases. I spend less time on Facebook and more time on the phone with my parents. But it doesn’t matter to me — nothing could be more important than visiting my parents in person to see how my mom is doing. At this point, going home only once in every four months is too large and distressing of a gap to handle. The next Thanksgiving — one year after initially noticing symptoms of Alzheimer’s in my mom — I returned home once again. My entire family now knew about my mom’s condition and was quietly sympathetic.

This year, I helped my mom prepare Thanksgiving dinner, made decisions about what to start cooking first, and ensured we had all the ingredients we needed. I took her shopping, for walks around the neighbourhood, and to visit our friends and family. While I often feel the need to apologize on her behalf — her not-yet-greying hair doesn’t help to explain her confusion or disorientation — I realize it’s not an apology anyone should have to make.

My mom is happy, but shows signs of anxiety and frustration during the brief moments when she starts to realize the loss of agency in her own life. What’s particularly scary is that my family can’t seem to convey a lasting understanding to my mom about her condition. She expresses frustration with her doctors, often unable to understand why they ask her so many questions or make certain recommendations. My dad helps to mediate those conversations, but my mom has started to sense that she’s living partially in the dark.

Dementia & Alzheimer’s in Canada
Maybe your grandparents are starting to show signs of dementia or Alzheimer’s, or you currently act as an informal caregiver for another family member facing a degenerative condition or disease.

According to the Alzheimer’s Society of Canada, nearly 750,000 Canadians currently live with dementia or Alzheimer’s, and this number will increase to nearly 1.5 million by 2031. Canadian policy makers are expressing concern that the Canadian health-care system will not be able to keep up with the increasing caregiving demands of an aging population. Unlike many degenerative physical conditions, much of the support and treatment for
individuals living with dementia or Alzheimer’s often rests with their families instead of the formal health-care system.

In 2011, family caregivers in Canada spent 444 million unpaid hours caring for loved ones with dementia according to the Alzheimer’s Society of Canada. The effects are particularly profound for young caregivers. Ottawa’s Vanier Institute of the Family reports that many children of parents with degenerative conditions face increased stress and anxiety, social isolation, and a sense of resentment about their caregiving responsibilities.

Much like my struggle to decide where to move after graduation or how I should balance time between academics and family, young caregivers can sometimes feel like their choices or opportunities are compromised because of a deep sense of family obligation. This experience has undoubtedly forced me to grow up much more quickly than my move across the country for university did.

Thinking about the future
I’ve always known, through a strange mix of anxiety and teenage embarrassment, that my parents were getting older. My dad, in his early seventies, still works as a heavy-duty mechanic after recovering from two major heart attacks. My mom, in her early sixties, had been encouraged into early retirement because of her inability to keep up with the pace of her workplace.

It became especially daunting when my parents sat me down in our living room to talk about their wills and retirement savings. I quickly did the math in my head. I’m 20, my mom is 60. I’ll hopefully have a decade before my brother and I need to start thinking about home care or assisted-living facilities for our parents. That’s a decade I’ll have before the guilt and sense of family obligation kicks in fully — that sense of obligation that pushes me to move closer to my parents and settle there longterm, to get the travel bug out of my system, and to start making “adult” choices.

I want and need my mom to be lucid enough to see me receive a Master’s degree, land a career, get married, have children and lead a happy and successful life. It is a difficult compromise: my sense of independence and newfound adulthood versus my growing sense of obligation to be my mom’s informal caregiver. It’s also a difficult reality to explain to my friends — if it’s even a familiar situation to them, it’s something they experience more distantly with their grandparents.

At an age when we are repeatedly told that our futures are ours and ours alone, it feels strange to start making decisions around someone other than myself. Should I move home after I graduate? How long should I plan on living with my parents? What if I decide to go to graduate school abroad and my mom’s condition deteriorates?

Moving forward
So, is the situation only going to get worse? Is my future as child of a parent with degenerative conditions destined to be one of compromise, sadness and grief? I have no choice but to come to terms with what will be a very uncertain future.

My mom teaches me to live every day with patience, grace, and a deep sense of caring. To have a relationship with my mom as she is today, without using my childhood as a point of comparison, is a true exercise in humility, maturity and compassion.

For years, my mom did so much to make sure our family was happy and cared for. She moved my brother and me to Edmonton so we could attend better schools than what was available in rural northern Alberta. For years, we commuted two hours each way every weekend to visit my dad.

She returned to the workforce after being a stay-at-home mom to help save for our university education. She listened to my trivial teenage-girl problems with a sense of gentleness and understanding unmatched by anyone. While her memory will fade, there is something that won’t — her deep sense of respect and investment in the wellbeing of her family.

It’s easy to grieve for what feels like a life-changing and unexpected loss, or to fear the day my mom won’t remember who I am. To only miss the person my mom once was feels dehumanizing, and doesn’t do her current self justice. It’s also easy to be angry — not at anyone in particular, but at a circumstance that is both heartbreaking and deeply infuriating.

In some ways, I have been robbed of my mother. She can’t give me the rational, adult advice about graduate-school programs or future next steps that my friends’ parents can provide with ease.

Sooner than I ever imagined this would happen, I am my mother’s caregiver — and that’s okay.