Home Blog Page 1309

SFU Profiles: International Women’s Day

0

By Monica Miller
Photos courtesy of Carole Gerson and PAMR

Carole Gerson

gerson2[1]

Carole Gerson is a professor in the English Department at SFU, where she also received her BA. Her work has spanned three decades and focused on early Canadian literature, including literary history and women writers. In 2000 she was inducted as a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada for her work in literature.
Gerson’s interest in researching female authors initially began because of the grant money available from a “women and work” program in the late 1970s. Gerson’s early research explored “creative writing as women’s work” and over the years she has followed up from different angles exploring print culture, different eras, as well as particular authors such as L.M. Montgomery, Susanna Moodie, and E. Pauline Johnson.
What fuels the research is “tracking obscure people” — what Gerson calls “archeological-historical digging” — to find information that was lost or forgotten. Spending time deep in library archives and discovering that two different women were actually the same person, writing under a pseudonym or perhaps a married name later in life, is incredibly rewarding for her.
Many students don’t realize that not everything is digitized, explains Gerson. Her current research is part of the Canadian Writing Research Collaboratory (CWRC), which has multiple projects investigating women’s writing in Canada including playwrights, non-fiction, cabaret, and writing in various eras. Gerson is the project leader for “Canada’s Early Women Writers” and the database is accessible through the SFU Library.
Carole Gerson’s research has also been published in several books. She was a contributor to all three volumes of History of the Book in Canada, covering pre-1800s to the 1980s, and co-edited the third volume. Gerson’s involvement in researching Mohawk author E. Pauline Johnson was incited by longtime friend and “Pauline Johnson addict” Veronica Strong-Boag, a historian and founding director of UBC’s Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice. Together, they published two books on Johnson, who was not always well received in society. “She embodied numerous cultural concerns,” says Carole. “Her writing drew on white and native sources, and she forged an independent career as a single woman.”
This year is the centenary of Johnson’s death, and in honour of her cultural legacy and passing here in Vancouver, Herstory Cafe — which is co-organized by another SFU professor Lara Campbell — is hosting a couple of events in her honour with the City of Victoria’s Poet Laureate, Janet Rogers. “Poetry in the Park for Pauline: Poetry Offerings” takes place on Johnson’s birthday, March 10, in Stanley Park at Johnson’s Memorial at Ferguson Point.
Most recently, Gerson published Canadian Women in Print, 1750–1918, exploring the authorship and contributions of Canadian women across literary history including compositors, bookbinders, fiction writers, journalists, adventurers, and educational texts in eras that were less welcoming to women in the workforce.
Following the research trail of overlooked Canadian authors, Gerson’s next project concentrates on lesser-known female authors from the 1920s–50s. They were left out of the Modernist canon because “they were seen to be insufficiently literary.”

Anne Giardini

Anne Giardini recieves QEII Diamond Jubilee Medal
Anne Giardini is a busy woman with many professional roles, including president of Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd., lawyer and executive, board member for the Vancouver Board of Trade, chair of the board of the Vancouver International Writers Festival, member of the Board of Directors for UniverCity, and deputy chair of the Board of Governors at SFU. She is also a mother to three children, married for more than 25 years, a critically acclaimed author of fiction, and daughter of the late Carol Shields. Yet she also finds time to be an active volunteer in the community.
Giardini has supported many organizations that help women and girls to achieve their goals, including Plan Canada, the Vancouver YWCA’s Women of Distinction Awards, and the Young Women in Business group. It was for her involvement with Plan Canada’s “Because I’m a Girl” campaign supporting females in Tanzania that Giardini was awarded a Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee medal in early 2013.
Plan Canada “reaches out to marginalized people and countries, providing programs, formal structure and clear deliverables that help them manage their selves,” which Giardini respects, and her involvement is “a complete alignment of personal values.” Giardini feels that Rosemary McCarney, President and CEO, “understands and respects girls and women and why they don’t have power.”
Giardini has written two novels and is currently working on her third, each tackling a difficult theme facing society and humanity. The Sad Truth about Happiness (2005) addressed both happiness and unhappiness, and Advice for Italian Boys (2009) dealt with unwanted advice. Her current novel, with the working title Anguish Pie, centres on death “in a non-morbid way.”
“I write about issues and problems that interest me,” she explains, “and through writing I gain understanding and can pass on what I’ve learned through the novel.” Reflecting on learning through reading in fiction versus non-fiction, Giardini comments that “in fiction, we learn about the human condition — it is expansive.”
She recently finished re-reading Annie Dillard’s An American Childhood, “the perfect book” which she reads again every couple of years, discovering something new about it or herself based on how she’s changed as an individual.
Giardini has been described as a “petite powerhouse.” She is an incredible role model for trusting in your own strengths and instincts, to be intelligent and read up on what you don’t know. “Have confidence that you do have something to offer. Every one of us does.”

The BC budget shows lack of regard for students

0

Recent budget is a slap in the face for anyone trying to get an education

By Meaghan Wilson

The pre-election budget of the government offers little financial aid to those seeking higher education. The government has reduced its contribution to the operating budgets of post-secondary institutions by $45 million between 2012–2013 and 2015–2016, a 2.4 per cent drop.

Additionally, funding was cut to public transit, which has Translink projecting a $65 million deficit this year. Increasing funding to all of these programs would help students, but more importantly aid in creating a sustainable economy in every part of the province.

Late last fall, the SFU’s administration sat down with the government and proposed its opportunities agenda for BC. The agenda is characterized by three key pillars: increasing space for qualified students, funding for students in need, and a commitment to job innovation.

The result of this would be an investment in British Columbians. However, the release of the budget would predict a reduction in the number of student spaces in both college and university, less money for student assistance, and less support for advanced education overall.

TransLink funding was also cut, another indication that students are in the province’s blind spot. Arguably, a more efficient transit system would increase job opportunities at all levels of employment.

Furthermore, the buses to SFU Burnaby campus are insufficient and do not meet the current demands of its ridership. Students, faculty, staff, and residents pass up many opportunities over simple accessibility issues.

The campus will also be losing an entire parking lot near Cornerstone, which will only increase the demand for transit and the need for an adequate system like the proposed gondola.

This is especially true when considering that the Burnaby Mountain community will only continue to grow and develop. Though that the overall Metro Vancouver transit system needs to expand, Translink has not been given the financial tools with which to get it done. The proposed budget certainly reflects this.

The budget did, however, show an investment in the BC Training and Education Savings Grant. While encouraging parents to establish RESPs is a goal worth pursuing, it is not something that many families can easily afford to do.

In addition, this new system actually provides students with less money by the time they enter higher education due to the cuts in core funding. The program appears to favour education at the outset, but it will not take effect until students graduate high school in 2024, so it solves nothing for current students, and puts the responsibility for funding post-secondary education back onto the parents.

Although finance minister Michael de Jong calls the budget “balanced” and “credible,” the current proposal reveals the direction in which the current government is taking the province: one that does not favor either education or students.

Until harassment ends, the Women’s Centre is still valuable

0

WEB-international hands woman-Mark Burnham

The UN’s push for 2013 to be the year to end violence against women highlights this need

By Janice Nienaber
Photos by Mark Burnham

International Women’s Day is a solid reminder of the importance of a women’s centre at SFU. This year, the UN’s theme for International Women’s Day is “A promise is a promise: Time for action to end violence against women.” This highlights the SFU Women Centre’s role as a safe haven from violence, but that isn’t all the women’s centre is.

People are often surprised at the presence of a women’s centre on a university campus. When I first told my friends that I had started to drop by the SFU Women’s Centre, I was met with skeptical glances and concerned leading questions like “has someone hit you?” and “what is it doing there anyway?”
To this day, a women’s centre holds connotations of being reserved for “broken” women. While many women’s centres are crucial in helping the homeless and abused, this mentality suggests that other women might not need a women’s centre at all. However, all women (regardless of circumstance) can find value in the women’s centre.

A common student response to surveys about the need for the SFU Women’s Centre is that it provides a sense of safety. Students at SFU, including me, seek out the women’s centre because we feel safe there. You may ask: isn’t SFU “safe”? Well, consider this:

Every day, most women get a lot of unwanted sexual attention. Statistics Canada reports that 87 per cent of women have experienced sexual harassment. Unwanted sexual attention often starts during our pre-teen years and continues into adulthood without any sign of stopping. Yes, we are legally protected from rape and abuse, but we are not safe from subtle sexism and harassment.

Canadian women, as a group, are routinely groped in clubs, cat-called in streets, hit on by managers, ogled on the bus, and sexually harassed online. The media tells us that we need to be beautiful and sexy to be valued, but then we’re accused of being a “slut” when we sleep with someone.

On (and off of) SFU’s campus, we have to listen to sexist jokes and rape jokes by guys who think it’s funny to joke about something that degrades and scares women. If we don’t laugh along with these sexist jokes, we’re often accused of having no sense of humour.

Really, we love to laugh, but find it hard when we’re being demeaned simply for being a woman. Yes, most guys are really nice people that wouldn’t purposefully make women feel uncomfortable; nonetheless, it still happens.

In the SFU Women’s Centre, there’s none of this. It’s one of the rare public spaces where we can find this sense of safety.
That is why girls who aren’t homeless, battered (or otherwise abused) also need the women’s centre. The SFU Women’s Centre provides shelter in a world where most of us never feel completely safe from unwanted sexual attention.

Unwanted sexual attention does not always put women in immediate physical danger in the way that sexual violence does. However, inside and outside of school, it remains our reality and it remains degrading.

The UN’s focus for International Women’s Day is ending violence against women. However, violence and unwanted sexual attention against women will not end by itself. It will only end when men and women demand it from their society, their peers, and themselves. The SFU Women’s Centre is crucial in making this happen.

SFYou: Fight for your pride

0

WEB-Samonte Cruz-Mark Burnham

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos by Mark Burnham

Samonte Cruz grew up in a rural area, so when he come out as queer around the age of 16, he was one of the only queer people that was out at his high school. He endured daily harassment, from being called a “dyke” in the hallway to getting his tires slashed, and these years were marked with feelings of isolation, fear, and loneliness — all of which drew him to helping people later in life. When he was 19, he came out as trans, and his college years were transitional ones.

“I knew that it was wrong for me to be targeted this way, and I didn’t have any community or resources,” he says. Because of this lack of education, his college years were overwhelming; he not only had to come to terms with his own identity, but also to educate everybody around him.
“I think if I could have just focused on myself, I would have been in a much better place,” he admits. It is for this reason that he’s so passionate about providing education and resources as Out On Campus’ office and volunteer coordinator. OOC is looking to change that title to “program and volunteer coordinator” as the position begins to focus more on program development and education.
For some years after he graduated university, Samonte did media-focused work with youth, including with BC-based Access to Media Education Society, which works with marginalized populations to put out media from their perspective. Always an active organizer in the LGBT community, Samonte got hired as staff at SFU’s Out On Campus in 2006.

“Not being a student, I’ve got more resources than some other folks here, whose main focus is going to be school,” he says of his position. “With some of the programs we’re hoping to start, we’re trying to take some of the pressure off of the individuals to be able to feel like there’s some outside support for them, make space for people to not have to be those educators, but . . . if they do want to take an educational role, there is that program for that.”
Samonte shows the same drive in his personal life, no matter what it throws him. Three years ago, he was hit by an SUV and was left with a broken neck, and stuck in an upper body and neck brace for three months. Through the support of his co-workers and the community, he recovered and has since continued his work at OOC, as avid as ever.

The focus lies on education, and OOC members have been going to classrooms to talk about the difference between sex and gender; they’re looking to take it further, however, and expand this into educational programs.

“Even though there are a lot of benefits in Canada, there are still a lot of issues that make it so it’s not safe for people to come out, and it’s gonna take a long time for these issues to be resolved,” says Samonte. “Our hope is that we can break down some of those stereotypes and prejudices that are being perpetuated in larger society, and actually change something on a bigger scale. For us, here, education is the way to do that.”

Why support Out On Campus? “Everybody is affected by homophobia and transphobia, regardless of how you identify. We all have genders and we all have sexualities and the restrictions that are enforced upon queer and trans folks are also enforced against folks that don’t identify that way,” says Samonte. “By working on these issues, it doesn’t just liberate queer and trans folks, it will liberate everyone to be able to express themselves however they want to.”
March 11 marks Queer Awareness Week, which will include workshops on gender identity, a movie screening, and a series of dialogues and panel discussions with some of the campus’s Christian groups.

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride to McGill

0

Students in Quebec have no one to blame for program cuts but themselves

By David Dyck

Be careful what you wish for. Last year, Quebec students wished long and hard for the ongoing tuition freeze in the province to remain intact. They wished it on the streets, sometimes without clothes on, they banged on dishware and decried capitalism, and pinned small red squares to their clothes to indicate how much they were wishing for it.

They wished so long and so hard and so loudly that they finally got what they wanted. An election happened, and a brand new party was put into power, a party that agreed that their wishes were good and valid and just. The freeze was here to stay, and tuition rates would remain the lowest in Canada, in North America even.

Wishes do come true. There is hope for the downtrodden, hungry, poor arts students who wished so hard.
And then the unthinkable happened. A blind spot in all of the wishing came out: money is required to run universities. If the money isn’t there, then one of two things has to happen: either the university must look for funding in other places, or the university must cut costs. Cutting costs means cutting programming, getting rid of staff and administration, and increasing class sizes.

The latter scenario is exactly what is happening at McGill. The new PQ government is slashing $124 million from universities across the province, and McGill is expected to cut $19.1 million from their own budget.

The administration has been lashing out at the new government for “betraying” the students.

One former McGill history and economics professor told The Bull and Bear, “Instead of taking on the responsibility for the province’s horrible economic performance by increasing their own debt, the PQ has been trying to transfer this responsibility to the universities.”

Yet no one seems to be linking these two very obviously cause-and-effect events. The university isn’t blaming the student strike. The PQ isn’t. Everyone is blaming the government, an easy scapegoat.

And maybe this former prof is right. Maybe the PQ should have taken the 124 million-dollar bath to think about what happens when you grant the wish of hundreds of Quebecois arts students who can’t do math. But who loses out? Someone else’s budget has to be slashed instead, or the province increases its debt.

Of course, it would be too easy to look at the real problem — there’s a tuition freeze. That tuition was supposed to be unfrozen, a plan already rolled into the 2013 budget, but it never happened. Now McGill — and every other post-secondary institution in la belle province — is suffering.

If you give a child all of the candy it wants, it will get sick because it doesn’t know any better. The child might not like it, and might cry and fuss and plead, but the fact is that that is preferable to the consequences that unlimited candy will have on the health of the child. The student strike displayed ignorance about how the real world works, and the subsequent budget cuts are the very real fallout from wishful, fantastical thinking being made into policy.

Peakcast #5

0

A special edition of the Peakcast where the ladies from the office discuss International Women’s week.

Peakcast #4

0

Editors David Dyck, Will Ross, Rachel Braeuer, and Gary Lim discuss humorous issues and more!

Quvenzhane Wallis won’t stop asking everyone she knows what a “c***” is.

1

By Gary Lim and Alison Roach

HOUMA, Louisiana — Uncomfortable silence and dry-mouthed stammering permeated the sleepy neighborhood of West Hollow, Houma yesterday night. When nine-year-old Oscar nominee Quvenzhane Wallis asked her entire family over dinner what a “cunt” was.

The Beasts of the Southern Wild actress explained that she had heard the word on a news report about herself and was curious as to what it meant.

The entire situation stems from live coverage of the Academy awards last Sunday online by satirical news source The Onion, who tweeted: “Everyone else seems afraid to say it, but that Quvenzhane Wallis is kind of a cunt, right? #Oscars2013”

The comment was met with ferocious backlash on Twitter, with many users condemning the satirical website’s use of the word “cunt” to describe a child. Since then, the The Onion has issued a public apology to the young actress for the 102-character character defamation.

Currently attitudes in the Wallis household are divided on how to handle the situation. Father Venjie Wallis Sr. and siblings Vejon and Venjie Jr. think it best to tell her the truth, while mother and sister Qulyndreia and Qunyquekya opt for vehemently denying any knowledge of the word until she forgets about it or gets tired of asking.

Qulyndreia, her mother, spoke to The Peak regarding her daughter’s inquisitiveness.

“Quvenzhane’s a nine-year-old girl. How, I ask you, could it be appropriate to teach her that word? To a child?! She has so much promise; my child, a Best Actress nominee. Did you know she’s been even been cast to play little orphan Annie in the movie Annie (2014)? Quvenzhane has a bright future ahead of her, and exposing her to this kind of language at such this age, it’s a bad influence. Lindsay Lohan learned the word [REDACTED. WE CAN PRINT CUNT. BUT NOT THAT. – Ed.] on the set of Parent Trap. Look at her now. ”

As of Tuesday morning, Quvenzhane Wallis’s investigation of the word’s definition is still ongoing with the family remaining tight-lipped. After a near miss involving a Google search, the young actress has been grounded from the family computer for the foreseeable future.

Sources have also reported a sighting of Wallis focus-grouping with other neighborhood children to see if any of them know the meaning of the word “cunt.” Currently the group speculates it be some kind of toy, animal or power ranger.

As of press-time, Wallis and several neighborhood friends have created a new jump-rope rhyme consisting of the word “cunt” repeated over and over to the tune of “Twinkle, twinkle little star.”

Getting agro over Argo et al

0

WEB-argo copy
By Will Ross

The Oscars were almost over when their insidiousness reached its peak. First lady Michelle Obama was brought in to present best picture, delivered some platitudes about how these films prove “love can endure against all odds” etc., and handed the best picture Oscar to Argo.

There has been much criticism given to the moment: Argo, a tale of ingenuity and the triumph of US diplomacy, was considered a surefire winner. Selecting FLOTUS as the presenter seemed indiscreet. And the faux-apologetics of host Seth MacFarlane’s endless misogynist tirades have rightly taken a shellacking.

But to blast the Oscars for a sensational political kumbaya or sexist sluggery is to miss the forest for the trees. The real outrage was in Obama’s parade of platitudes, all the more so because it didn’t stick out like a sore thumb.

The speech was a capstone in the grand delusion of the Academy Awards, an event that purports to “recogniz[e] the year’s best films” (oscar.com’s words), ones that “broaden our minds” (Obama’s). But it operates as little more than Hollywood self-promotion. The movies with the biggest advertising budgets for award campaigns (in Argo’s case, around $10 million) are the ones that get nominated.

It’s not that Oscar choices are, as critics often hold, “political.” The individual votes of Academy voters are not made public, sparing them from political repercussions. The problem is precisely the opposite: the Oscars are a willfully apolitical event, voters do not have a comprehensive, international knowledge of cinema in their given fields, and they are by and large quite happy to vote for the most-promoted movies instead of seeking out the best and most groundbreaking ones.

In light of the winners and nominees, to suggest that Academy voters’ thought processes are political is to give them too much credit. The ceremony aims to indulge as low a common denominator as possible while still wearing a veil of sophistication and respectability.

After all, why would a ceremony purporting to showcase the worthiest cinema dedicate roughly 15 minutes of airtime to James Bond montages and songs? Does James Bond need the exposure more than, say, Iranian director Jafar Panahi, who has been jailed and banned from filmmaking by the government, and yet still makes films that are smuggled out of the country in protest of censorship and totalitarian oppression? Or is that a little too political — and too foreign — for the Academy’s tastes?

The one non-English language film that escaped the “best foreign film” ghetto, Amour, pulled down a few nominations, including Best Picture. Impressive for a film whose point runs opposite to Michelle Obama’s description: love does not, and can not, and should not “endure all.” But on Oscar night Amour was neutered and rebranded, from a ruthless and stark depiction of love and death to a Hallmark drama with all the nuance of a Nicholas Sparks movie.

The nomination of Amour probably had more to do with the incumbent respectability it earned at the Cannes Film Festival in May 2012. There it won the Palm d’Or, often viewed as the real top prize of cinema. Cannes is a hotly anticipated festival and subject to immense industry pressure, yet its juries preserve its integrity time and time again, rewarding ambitious, difficult films that leave a lasting mark on the entire art form.

Regardless, the Oscars aren’t likely to change their ways anytime soon. So next time, I urge you to look at the prizewinners of other ceremonies — like the Berlin Film Festival, or Cannes, or even a film critics circle. They don’t have the same hype or spectacle, and there may not be many movies you’ve heard of, but the best awards rarely have the most dollars behind them.

TED comes to Vancouver

0

the peak ted

The celebrated talk conference to be held here in 2014

By Kelli Gustafson
Photos courtesy of Kris Krug

An announcement earlier this month revealed that the TED conference (Technology, Entertainment, Design) will be hosting their 30th anniversary in Vancouver in 2014, running from March 17-21. TED is an annual West Coast conference that invites some of the world’s top “thinkers” to give 50 or more talks on “ideas worth spreading,” spanning the four day conference. Topics range from groundbreaking scientific discovery to analyses of current events to child-rearing philosophy. Past presenters have included Bill Gates, Colin Powell, Al Gore, and Sir Richard Branson.

The TED conference has been traditionally held in Long Beach, California; however, organizers have decided to move the location to the Vancouver Convention Centre for 2014 to celebrate their anniversary. Organizers suggest on the TED website that Vancouver acts as an ideal location for this conference: “Vancouver, a city that’s itself an inspiration — cosmopolitan, energetic, innovative, yet with unrivaled natural beauty.”

In a statement given by Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson, he spoke highly of TED, stating, “Having the TED organizers choose Vancouver as their new home is a big vote of confidence in the creative entrepreneurs, social
innovators, and community leaders who make Vancouver a leading-edge city.”

The conference is expected to attract an audience of approximately 1,200. Those interested in attending must undergo a competitive application process, and once selected by the TED panel, a single ticket will run attendees approximately $7,500 USD, according to the TED website.

While the main TED2014 conference takes place in the city, TEDActive2014 will run concurrently in Whistler. Both events will share the simple theme of “The Next Chapter,” with the idea of looking back at the significant developments of the past 30 years to give some insight into what’s ahead. Tickets to the Whistler event are estimated at $3,750 USD.

Talks will also be available to view for free on the official TED website, and many past talks can be found on YouTube. For those who seek a less expensive in-person TED conference experience, SFU has its own incarnation of the TED conference, TEDxSFU.

TEDxSFU is an independent TED event, however it is still licensed by TED. TEDxSFU was founded by SFU student Michael Cheng and was first held in the fall of 2011. Cheng said in an interview with The Peak, “The event is open to the public, but we always make an effort to ensure a portion of SFU-related speakers and attendees [are given priority].”

TEDxSFU provides a similar experience and environment as any other TED conference, as attendees must still undergo an application process to be a part of the audience. TEDxSFU will host its third conference at an unconfirmed date this year.