Home Blog Page 1301

Annual Missing Women’s March hits DTES streets

0

WEB-womens march- ljudmila Petrovic-1
Aboriginal, women’s groups honour missing women

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos by Ljudmila Petrovic

It was a rainy and grey Valentine’s Day and the smell of burning sage was rising above the banners that crowded the corner at Main and Hastings. “In memory of those that are no longer with us,” read one. “RIP Teressa Williams,” another.

A large crowd of people of all genders and cultural backgrounds had gathered for the 22nd Annual Women’s Memorial March; female or not, Aboriginal or otherwise, everybody was there to honor and respect the missing women of the Downtown Eastside.

In 1991, a Coast Salish woman was murdered on Powell Street, sparking the first women’s memorial march on Valentine’s Day of that year. 22 years later, the march continues every Valentine’s Day to honor her memory and the memories of women like her. The first woman on Vancouver’s missing women’s list went missing Sept. 12, 1978; by 2001, a joint police task force estimated the number of missing women at 45.

In 2002, pig farmer William Pickton was arrested and charged in association to 27 of the murdered women. In 2007, he was finally convicted of only six of these charges, and the number of missing women in the Downtown Eastside alone is estimated at well over 60.

Dozens of women have gone missing between 1969 and 2006 from the “Highway of Tears” — an 800 km stretch of highway between Prince George and Prince Rupert. Due to the lack of transportation in the area, women are often forced to hitchhike, and while the official victim count lies at 18, many Aboriginal community leaders have estimated that the numbers are significantly higher, even as steep as 45.

This year’s event began at 11 a.m., with family members of the missing women speaking out in front of Carnegie Community Center Theatre. At noon, the general public was invited to join them and begin the march, which circles around the DTES, stopping at places where women were last seen or found. As the march snaked around the neighborhood, the community resonated with the sound of beating drums and song — stopping only at intervals to perform traditional ceremonies or to lay roses at these spots.

The air was heavy and somber, but there was nonetheless a sense of resilience, love and compassion. One Aboriginal woman was handing out handmade cards that read, “Each time a person stands up for an ideal . . . she sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. These ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.” As a cameraman passed by her, she pressed one into his hand, only to have him push it back to her, saying he didn’t want it.

“If you’re filming this, you should know what it’s about,” she insisted. “It’s about love and respect.” This sentiment was reflected when the march stopped in front of the courtroom for speeches by community activists. Tears flowed freely as Beverley Jacobs, former President of the Native Women’s Association of Canada took the microphone.

She spoke of honouring the spirits of the missing women, but she was also sure to point out the shortfalls of the police and RCMP in dealing with the issue of missing women, two months after Commissioner Wally Oppal released a 1,448- page report concluding that police work was in fact inadequate and biased, and led to so many disappearances.

“This hasn’t stopped. Still, after all these years, we still have missing and murdered Indigenous women in this country,” she said, to cries of “shame!” “We need our allies to stand with us, because we are all in this together.” She was followed by Aboriginal activist CJ Julien, who spoke of her own experiences as a recovering addict and former sex worker, and her sister, who was found murdered in 1992, only five minutes away from the Pickton farm.

“There is no justice in this courthouse. No justice at all,” she exclaimed, pointing behind her. “They didn’t care to listen to me. They called me a junkie, a prostitute, an Indian. Shame on them!” She, too, spoke of the internal power struggles and disinterest that led to the Pickton Inquiry’s failure.

“There’s still denying justice, and they’re still not cooperating with one another . . . but yet all those women, all my sisters and my friends, were going missing.”

The march continued until the crowd reached Oppenheimer Park at 2:30 p.m., where everyone gathered with candles around the park’s totem pole for a healing circle. Several eagles circled over the healing circle at Oppenheimer Park as family members of the missing women beat their drums and sang. “They’re telling us that [the women] are all alright,” whispered one woman.

Talking politics: distilling the NDP’s stance on education

0

An interview with NDP’s Advanced Education Critic Michelle Mungall

By Alison Roach

On her way to our on-campus interview, Michelle Mungall got a little lost. While she has spent the past two years on post-secondary campuses throughout the province and has visited SFU Burnaby four times by her count, the distinction between different Renaissance Cafes is still a tricky one.

When she did breeze into the Cornerstone Renaissance, I was a bit taken-aback. When I had arranged the meet-up with the NDP Advanced Education Critic and MLA for Nelson Creston, I was expecting someone who looked a lot more — well, like a politician. However, Mungall sat down in a whirl of long, dark hair, a brightly coloured handbag, and a tiny gem peeking out from the side of her nose. And then we started talking about the upcoming election, and NDP politics.

Here are the highlights of our conversation.

On BC’s looming worker deficit:
“The fact [is] that 80 per cent of jobs are going to require some level of post-secondary education in the next few years, and we’re just not going to have the population in BC as it is to fill that, even if we educated everybody. But the bigger problem is not everybody is getting the training they need for the jobs of the future, and there’s a variety of reasons for that. Affordability being top of mind.”

On the Liberals’ $50 million cut to post-secondary education:
“In talking about the cuts I’ve used this word and the current advanced education minister really didn’t like it; and I said “dismal.” I think it is dismal to make these type of decision at a time that’s not good for BC’s economy. We need to be training young people at all levels of post-secondary education, and that’s what the data clearly shows.”

On the pushback from universities:
“All [university] presidents responded with a letter to the provincial government which insisted that these cuts will impact students. This letter was unprecedented. Never before have all 25 post-secondary institution presidents gotten together and done this. So they’re pushing back . . . they’re not pushing back out of self-interest, they’re pushing back because there is clear data coming from the provincial government about why we need to invest in post-secondary education.”

The NDP solution:
“Right off the bat we need to be ensuring that we’re reducing barriers for young people to start postsecondary education. One of the best ways we can do that, we all know, is affordability, and for those who are struggling the most, and getting into the biggest debt-loads, there’s something we can do. We did it up to 2004, everyone else does it, and its financial needs-based grants. We’re going to put $100 million back into that grant program.”

Where they’re going to get that money:
“Back in 2008 the Liberals cut a corporate capital gains tax from a very nominal rate, about two per cent, to zero per cent. So that means the big banks are not paying any of that tax. The reason they’re not paying any of that tax is they said “get rid of this tax for us and we’ll create more jobs.” They cut jobs . . . so we’re going to bring back that corporate capital gains tax to that 2008 level, a very competitive level still in North America, and we’re going to take the money from that, which is about $150–$200 million revenue, and we’re going to put $100 million into financial needs-based grants.”

On dealing with the loans you already have:
“We’ve been talking about interest rates for student loans, BC having the highest. Can we reduce that interest rate? And how much would we be able to reduce it by? There’s definitely a desire for us to be looking at that and that’s what I’ve been doing; crunching the numbers. It’s looking pretty good. It’s also a matter of fairness. BC students are paying the highest interest rate across Canada, on the highest debt-loads.”

And why this is all important:
“I think it’s really important to have these conversations over the years, before heading into an election, to get a really good understanding of what’s been going on in our system; where it’s at, and what we can do to improve it. We do have an amazing system here in BC. We have tremendous schools that have very high international ranking, so a lot to be proud of. We want to keep it that way, and to keep it that way we have to make these investments.”

University Briefs – Feb 18, 2013

0

 

By Alison Roach
Pierre Lafontainee new leader of university sports

Former CEO and national coach of Swimming Canada Pierre Lafontaine has been named the new leader of Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS), the national governing body. The small 10-person staff at CIS has since been infused with new energy since Lafontaine’s appointment, who personal hopes to focus on keeping Canada’s elite athletes at home, singing TV deals to fund competitive programs, and boosting national pride. “We need to become the destination of choice for high-performance athletes in the country,” said Lafontaine, “We’re losing too many of our best kids to the US.”

With files from The Star

 

McGill decries budget cuts

McGill University’s Board of Governors stated that there is no way the university can possibly cut $20 million by April, as been requested by the Parti Quebecois government. The cuts would represent nearly five per cent of McGill’s operation budget. McGill’s principal Heather Munroe-Blum called the measures, “draconian, unpredictable [and] ineffective to running a quality-accessibility university system.” The board has asked the PQ to redraw the retroactive cuts, saying their demands are too much for the university to handle.

With files from CBC

 

New Brunswick tries to hold onto grads

The provincial government is launching a program that will create new jobs and attempt to keep recent university graduates in the province. The One-Job Pledge initiative gives businesses monetary incentives to create new positions for new graduates, or anyone who has graduated within the last four years. Businesses participating in the program will receive government support for a year, and will be expected to continue the job after that period, although this isn’t ensured.

With files from The Brunswickan

SFU international student killed in car accident

0

sfu intl student photo - matthew tichenor : flickr

Zambian native Mwekwa Kaongwa died at scene

By Alison Roach
Photos by Matthew Tichenor / Flickr

The victim of a fatal car crash in downtown Vancouver on Feb. 8 was identified last week as SFU student Mwekwa Kaongwa, a 22 year old engineering student from Zambia. Kaongwa was killed when the white BMW he was driving veered off the viaduct, struck a tree and a pole, and flipped over. Kaongwa died at the scene of the crash.

The accident took place at around 3 a.m. Friday morning on the Georgia Street Viaduct. “It is early in the investigation, but police believe speed is a factor in the crash,” said Vancouver police spokesman Constable Brian Montague in a press release. Police have not confirmed witness reports that street racing may have played a part in the crash. “We may not know all of the contributing factors, other than speed, for some time,” said Montague.

The other three passengers, all between the ages of 20 and 24 years old and also from Zambia, survived the crash. The other victims of the crash were transported to hospital with “very serious and life-threatening injuries,” Montague stated. All three are expected to survive. Kaongwa’s name was not released immediately following the crash, pending notification of next of kin. The SFU African Student Association (ASA) announced Kaongwa’s death “with great sorrow” on their Facebook page shortly after the accident. A small spiritual service was held the following Sunday morning at Restoration Church on the SFU Surrey campus, attended by Kaongwa’s close friends and classmates.

SFU officials declined to release any personal information on Kaongwa, out of respect for those close to him. SFU director of projects Chris Rogerson, did speak on behalf of the university. “What I can say is that we are always very saddened by such news, when a young person is taken away so suddenly,” stated Rogerson.

Rogerson went on to state that the university is currently working with the family and friends of Kaongwa, “to make sure they have the necessary support in this difficult time.” A group of friends of the deceased are also working to put together a public, open memorial service for him, which will hopefully be attended by Kaongwa’s family.

The memorial is tentatively planned for Feb. 23. Rogerson was able to confirm that other people involved in the accident are affiliated with SFU as well, but could not go into numbers or detail. “We’re trying to support those people who need help at this point in time, and their personal privacy is theirs to keep,” he explained. Rogerson also emphasized the open accessibility of SFU health and counselling staff to anyone who may need support at this time.

Mica-El Mumba, a friend of Kaongwa’s, later spoke to his death, as reported by The Vancouver
Sun. “What I want them to know most about him is that he was a very open guy, very loving guy. And he used to work very hard,” said Mumba, “He was very passionate about what he did and I know that that passion was very contagious. And he was a great guy.”

This latest accident has elicited calls from the community to get rid of the bridges altogether. The Georgia Street Viaduct, which was originally built to be part of a freeway connecting to Highway 1, instead curves abruptly to join Prior Street.

The City of Vancouver has said it plans to remove both the Georgia and Dunsmuir Street viaducts, a move that Vancouver City Councillor Geoff Meggs said would make the Strathcona neighbourhood safer, according to CTV News.

“People do come off the viaducts if they’re not paying attention at excessive rates of speeds. As a result there’s a lot of danger for people who are trying to work and live in their own neighbourhood,” stated Meggs. For now, the investigation into the devastating accident continues while friends and classmates of Kaongwa mourn his loss.

Cruise Control your next run

0

WEB-running app-Vaikunthe Banerjee

A new technological development from SFU researchers helps runners crush their goals

By Kelli Gustafson
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

A research duo from Simon Fraser University’s Locomotion Lab have created a new app to help runners, entitled “Cruise Control.” Biomedical physiologist Max Donelan, along with PhD candidate Mark Snaterse, created this app after discovering that sound tempo can control running pace. Through the application of cruise control philosophy, this app works to assist runners in maintaining a particular pace, heart rate, or cadence, by controlling music tempo to pace their steps.

Donelan and Snaterse have spent the past few years perfecting the “control algorithms” for this new technology. “This project started a number of years ago when Max and I were looking into the mechanisms underlying the control of locomotion,” Snaterse said.

After conducting experiments, Donelan and Snaterse discovered that people would adjust their running speed in accordance with a shift in “metronome tempo [clicks, beats, etc.].” By applying this “control theory” and conducting more human experiments, Donelan and Snaterse became certain that runners could benefit with a technology to help regulate their speed using this theory. “Basically Cruise Control turns your music into your personal trainer,” Snaterse told The Peak.

After inputting your preferred distance, speed, cadence or heart rate, the app will select music from your phone, and adjusts the tempo automatically, to match your input goal(s). Snarterse compared the app to dancing; “during the run you just need to synchronize your steps with the music.” According to the developers, a runner can maintain their desired pace by having their steps matched to the tempo of the music playing.

According to Snaterse, all levels of runners could benefit from this app. “Regardless of your level, with Cruise Control it feels like your favourite band is right there with you timing their kick drum to drive you faster and further.” Snaterse admitted that he “never run[s] without the app anymore,” and revealed that his favorite song to run to is “Dancing Shoes” by The Arctic Monkeys.

The app has received wide acclaim from gadget buffs and cardio junkies alike, and has been featured on social media sites such as Mashable, Gizmag, Lifehacker, and Guyism. So if you’re looking for a way to stop your iPod from betraying you with swelling Celine Dion mid-workout, Cruise Control will run you $4.99 at the iTunes AppStore.

POINT: Chicken Wings Suck

1

WEB-chicken wings-Ljudmila Petrovic copy
Wings aren’t the only things that come in hot, steaming piles

By David “Eat Alberta Grassfed Beef” Dyck
Photos by Ljudmila Petrovic

To see Counter-Point, click here!

Chicken wings. They’re everywhere. If they were a currency, it would be inflated like the pre-WWII German economy, with remarkably similar results. Hundreds of value-seeking students packed into rows, ordering piles of wings for what appears to be a comparatively cheap rate on every “wings night” you find yourself in the middle of. You’ve convinced yourself that you’re enjoying yourself, though. Why is that?

You just wanted to enjoy a beer and maybe a burger without having cheap chicken panzerschrecked all over the table. It starts with value. Why get the meal that you wanted when you can just eat chicken for pennies on the dollar? Besides, everyone else at the table is on board. The lust for chicken is spreading like a cheap, saucy plague, and you don’t want to be the jerk going against the tide.

That brings us to the sauces. Once the indoctrinated masses have convinced everyone to feast on tiny chicken meat, the last question is the sauce question. There are two final solutions: you can get wet wings or dry wings. No matter which way you line them up, each option is worse than the last.

Napkins turn to useless, shredded pulp in the wake of wet sauce; if you’re lucky enough to get one of the two moist towelettes that may or may not be provided, it’s good for cleaning half a hand, at most. In a situation where you have to use your fingers for anything besides shoveling chicken into your face, you’re screwed. Lick your fingers?

Last I checked, this is the first world. Get dry wings? They taste like rubber. Use a fork? With how tiny they are, it would be like trying to remove a tumour from a baby’s brain.

And of course they can’t be seasoned with rosemary and cracked pepper. No, it’s all FRANCO’S SUPER RED HOT SPICY WINGS that appeal to people who want to be rounded up and accosted with heat. Some sadomasochistic urge in your “friends” drives them to sit around tearing small amounts of meat off of unsettlingly small bones that are coated in a sticky, uncomfortable sauce. Chicken wings are not worth the hollow cost. Don’t just follow orders. Eat a burger.

COUNTER-POINT: Wings are the best

0

WEB-chicken wings-Ljudmila Petrovic copy
They’re cheap and part of a balanced meal

To see Point, click here!

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos by Ljudmila Petrovic

There’s something about hearing the words “Wings” and “Wednesday” together in a sentence that just warms the cockles of my heart. Maybe it’s because they’re fiscally responsible, maybe it’s because they come in those adorable baskets, maybe it’s because they’re fun to eat. I don’t know.

Okay, so it would probably be more “worth it” if you were paying 25–35 cents per wing if it belonged to a bigger bird, but I personally don’t see gnawing on an albatross wing as a fun after-class activity. Sure, you sometimes come across a vein, but that comes with the top-of-the-foodchain territory.

All in all though, wings are fun. You get your protein AND you get to choose from a plethora of sauces. It can never get boring, and there’s bound to be a sauce for each of your moods. Feeling spunky? Get some hot wings. Rustic? BBQ. Safe and traditional? Get some salt n’ peppa! Like a little girl? Go with honey garlic.

Another thing I love about wings is the competition that often comes with the territory. I find it hard to not accept a challenge, especially when there’s usually a taunt on the sauce list along the lines of: “Think you can survive our deathly spicy, burn-off-your-mouth SUPER HOT DEATH SUICIDE MURDER WINGS?” Uh, yeah. I do, actually. Let me tell you, you will stumble out of that bar feeling like you just dodged death. You may not look it, but you’ll sure as hell feel like a million bucks.

This brings me to my next point: beer. I’m not normally a huge beer drinker, but when I get some wings in front of me, it’s hard to resist some brew. Health and fitness magazines are always telling me that a balanced meal of carbohydrates and (lean) protein will keep me the most satiated and are a sure-fire way to drop at least 25 lbs in a week. Beer is a carbohydrate, correct? Chicken is a lean protein for sure. Women’s Health would be so proud of me right now.

But ultimately any day of the week that combines alliteration and meat is okay in my books. Yes, I am also a proponent of Steak Sundays and Filet Mignon Fridays, thanks for asking.

To see Point, click here!

Robinson rebuke reinforces negative assumptions about aboriginals

2

robinson the peak

Just because investigative journalism sullies a local hero doesn’t make it less valid

By Helena Friesen
Photos by Eleanor Qu

In Feb. 3’s column, Eric Onderwater asked the student body to “Leave John Furlong Alone.” Furlong, who has been accused of abusing aboriginal students during his stint as a voluntary teacher up North in the 70s, is also the former CEO of VANOC. Onderwater asks SFU students to ignore the laundry list of allegations against Furlong, which include his use of a leather strap on students, multiple accounts of sexual assault and his penchant for racist slurs.

Onderwater accuses Robinson (the Georgia Straight journalist who broke the story) of fabricating it with the intention of becoming famous, selecting Furlong at random as the target. Because most journalists would risk their entire careers in order to break a story about a marginalized group of people that most Canadians are not sympathetic towards while tearing down a local celebrity. A bulletproof plan if ever there was one.

Let’s do a little math: a furlong was typically used to measure the distance a team of oxen could plough without resting. It is approximately the equivalent of 5 km. Currently there are over 6.5 km worth of archived material and documents related to residential schools that are inaccessible because the government has refused to provide the resources to bring them out of storage. One furlong is equivalent to approximately 33 John Furlongs. This means you would need 3575 Mr. Furlongs in order to understand how much material the government is not allowing us to access.

Although John Furlong was not teaching at what is technically a residential school, he did teach at a Catholic school that had virtually the same mission of assimilation, humiliation and degradation. In fact, they even shared some of the same teachers. Because of this technicality, none of the students were compensated for the mistreatment they endured.

The millions of documents that attest to the conditions of residential schools are currently unavailable, seemingly because the government would like to make it as difficult as possible to access our atrocious history. If more people were aware, pieces like Onderwater’s would never be penned. Onderwater’s article reinforces the dominant attitude held by Canadians, and he works hard to delegitimize aboriginal people and silence their voices.

He states “Robinson thinks. . . Aboriginals are saintly creatures in need of every resource the government has to offer.” He conveniently neglects the fact that the entire population of Canada uses government funds, like the ones we get to keep the university running, to pave our roads, or to give subsidies to oil corporations.

The effects of residential schooling are not up for debate. If the allegations against Furlong are true, he must be held accountable. More importantly, Canadians need to stop believing the lie that indigenous people are bathing in pools of money with endless resources. It is important to contextualize the conditions of different aboriginal communities.

There is no monolithic aboriginal identity, or experience. Making sweeping generalizations about a group of people is called stereotyping and is best friends with a concept I like to call racism. How many Furlongs will it take for people to finally start believing aboriginal people and give it a rest? We can only hope that work like Robinson’s continues to highlight the gross negligence the government shows towards groups of people. I’m not so sure we need to leave John Furlong alone, but it would probably be best if Onderwater recognized the SFU community does not support his solo act.

Who’s afraid of feminism?

0

WEB-masculism-Mark Burnham

The masculist movement seems to think it has girl cooties at any rate

By Rachel Braeuer
Photos by Mark Burnham

There was a point in my life where I thought being a feminist was abhorrent. If you’ve read anything I’ve ever written before, take a minute to let that sink in. I understand the motivations that make the growing masculist movement want to grow independently from feminism, but I’m here to tell you it’s an unnecessary divide.

Eric Bock’s proposed event “Why UBC needs Masculism” is an enigma. Is it serious or is it a joke? Bock didn’t respond to a request for an interview, so the best I can do is assume based on the responses given on the page. He does cite studies about men getting raped and the increasing incidence of eating disorders in men. Comments from others who seem to take the event seriously felt honest, but were all shrouded in what I’d call hipster irony, save for fear that would be patronizing, err, matronizing?

None of the serious posts made on the board that I saw were off base. Men do face serious issues that are directly related to their gender. But let’s make two things clear: women had to fight for their right to be taken seriously in a man’s world for a long time and (with less frequency) still do. I appreciate, if the organizers are serious and not just mocking the “Why UBC needs feminism” event from the week before, how it feels to have people not take you seriously because of your gender. Really, this response proves their point, if they’re genuinely trying to make one.

Secondly, feminism (maybe not radical feminism, but generally) has, for at least a decade, been talking about and trying to proactively resolve these “men’s issues.” It was in women’s studies classes that I was introduced to studies in masculinity, not while interloping in the men’s locker room. This is what really gets me down. Men can be and are feminists. The white ribbon campaign was started by men, for men. One of the organizers of Slutwalk in Vancouver is male. If asked, I’d call most of the guys I know feminists. However, if I told them that, I imagine some would be displeased.

Masculists often talk about the need for “safe spaces for men.” I think this is one of the areas where feminist and masculists aren’t seeing eye-to-eye, and I wonder if this is a question of phrasing. When feminists talk about safe space for women, it references women only having a voice inside their own homes, and still being thought of as either the father or husband’s property (fun fact: rape was, until the mid-20th century, thought of as property damage because of this!)

Until women demanded their safe spaces outside of the home, all other spaces were, by default, men’s spaces. I agree that men don’t have arenas where they can talk about issues that impact them the way women do, but trying to usurp the need for safe spaces or appropriate feminist phrases demonstrates the unchecked privilege some masculists exhibit and places the movement in direct and arbitrary opposition with feminism.

If the masculist movement takes off and makes positive changes for men that in turn benefit everyone, I’ll still be sad I didn’t get to bro-out with everyone under the banner of feminism, but I’ll still be happy. I will support any movement that raises consciousness and promotes equality, but if masculists are going to rhetorically posit themselves against a movement that has been trying to advocate in similar way to them for years, I can’t help but be matronizing.

Critical thinking in the classroom

0

These skills are sadly lacking in a lot of upper-division seminars

By Daryn Wright

When surveyed, most undergraduate students claim that the most important thing they’ve gained from university is the ability to think critically. To this I ask: where is this critical thinking in the classroom? Because I’m not seeing much of it.

As an English major, most of what my peers and I do is engage in discussions about this or that text. Can we read Othello as having a homosexual theme? What can we derive from the metrical variation in Paradise Lost? Success as a student of English literature depends wholly on ones ability to pull meaning from text where it is not explicit — or to take what is explicit and explain why it is meaningful. It is a tragic moment when you’re sitting in a fourth-year English course — one where you expect your fellow classmates to have some critical thinking abilities about them — and the only discussion threads are “these lines are cool,” or worse, “I thought this was interesting.”

Well great, I’m glad you thought those lines were cool and interesting, because T.S. Eliot did some cool things and was an interesting guy, but can you tell me why you think so? This is where so many discussions stop: the dead-end alleyway of ignored metaphors and misinterpreted verses.

Constructing meaning from text, or from anything for that matter, is not merely a matching game either, as so many students seem to believe. Finding parallels in literature is not a hard thing to do — in fact, often the text nurtures this kind of engagement — but pairing two objects or concepts together is not enough to constitute an argument. This is one thing we could all learn from philosophy students, who, bless their hearts, are taught to tango in the form of logically sound arguments at an early stage in their education.

They are taught that simply pairing A and B together does not equal C, and no matter how much fluffy rhetoric they pack around that argument, it is not going to arrive in Timbuktu in one piece. If there is anything that English students — and all students in general — could benefit from, it’s a lesson in logic.

Is this problem rooted in the way we’ve been taught, or is it a form of laziness? Perhaps it is a badly-made cocktail of both causes, taking the form of rhetorically inflated discussions and papers that aren’t really arguing anything. Maybe this is my own disappointment speaking, but I thought that by the time we got to upper level courses we were supposed to have left behind the practice of merely matching “interesting” things.

Don’t get me wrong, sometimes classroom discussions result in the cracking open of texts in the most unexpected and exciting way, and collectively we are able to tease out revealing analogies and new interpretations. What directly follows from this is that tingly feeling you get in the bottom of your toes, that indication that the discussion has been enlightening in some way.

The opposite of this is the feeling of an exceedingly heavy skull as the class continues to hover around that one line that “sounds so cool.”

Maybe I’m being too harsh, and by no means am I a model academic, but if there’s one thing I can hope for in a university education, it’s that critical thinking will make its way back into our discussions, and that distracted, meaningless claims will make themselves scarce.