Go back

Political Corner: The Brexit deadline is soon, and its consequences are only looking worse with each day

Written by: Kelly Grounds, Peak Associate

After a year and a half of negotiation and internal conflicts, British Prime Minister Theresa May finally announced her party’s draft Brexit plan. Now, the deal will go to a special European council meeting to be approved and then back to the British Parliament for a final vote of approval.

The EU has been in intense negotiations with the UK ever since the referendum, and with the deadline approaching quickly (March 29, 2019), any deal would ease the divorce.

The issue is that May’s current plan has almost no chance of making it through Parliament and the European Council. May’s deal was even followed by discourse and division within her own cabinet; since the beginning of November, five of her party members have quit, including the Brexit secretary.

After the draft deal was announced, accusations of bullying and party pressure began to emerge. One report claims that only the environment secretary was in favour of the deal.

This lack of support is not promising for something that’s supposed to pad over a move as massive as Brexit. The lack of support should be a huge source of concern among the British public, and their concern could cause parliament to be more critical towards the deal.

If this deal fails, it is unclear as to what the UK will do. One possibility is a vote of confidence will be held in parliament, which could result in May being removed from power. But it could also result in a forced no-deal Brexit, which would be very bad for both parties but especially for the UK, as they do owe the EU an estimated 36 billion pounds.

Either way, after this much waiting for big progress to happen, it’s infuriating that Brexit somehow continues to be more worrying with every piece of news that comes along.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

SFU moves forward to leave the NCAA

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On September 17, SFU announced that the university was considering leaving the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the collegiate sports governing body of which Simon Fraser is the only non-American institution. The press release drew notable pushback, garnering opposition from the SFU Student-Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC) and the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) alike. As part of this decision, SFU commissioned an independent report led by Bob Copeland, senior vice-president of McLaren Global Sports Solutions Inc., to examine “the impacts of joining U Sports and/or other Canadian competitive frameworks.” U Sports is a governing body of university sports, with a distinct structure, rules, and philosophy from the NCAA.  The report was delivered on November 17. Nine days later, the university released a...

Read Next

Block title

SFU moves forward to leave the NCAA

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On September 17, SFU announced that the university was considering leaving the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the collegiate sports governing body of which Simon Fraser is the only non-American institution. The press release drew notable pushback, garnering opposition from the SFU Student-Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC) and the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) alike. As part of this decision, SFU commissioned an independent report led by Bob Copeland, senior vice-president of McLaren Global Sports Solutions Inc., to examine “the impacts of joining U Sports and/or other Canadian competitive frameworks.” U Sports is a governing body of university sports, with a distinct structure, rules, and philosophy from the NCAA.  The report was delivered on November 17. Nine days later, the university released a...

Block title

SFU moves forward to leave the NCAA

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On September 17, SFU announced that the university was considering leaving the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the collegiate sports governing body of which Simon Fraser is the only non-American institution. The press release drew notable pushback, garnering opposition from the SFU Student-Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC) and the Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) alike. As part of this decision, SFU commissioned an independent report led by Bob Copeland, senior vice-president of McLaren Global Sports Solutions Inc., to examine “the impacts of joining U Sports and/or other Canadian competitive frameworks.” U Sports is a governing body of university sports, with a distinct structure, rules, and philosophy from the NCAA.  The report was delivered on November 17. Nine days later, the university released a...