Go back

SFU Faculty Association votes to unionize

SFU faculty members and library staff have officially voted to unionize.

The results of the vote, which were made public on Thursday, May 15, showed a majority of staff members are for unionization. Out of the 800 votes cast, 590 were in favour of becoming a certified union, while 210 were opposed. Voter turnout on the issue was 73 per cent.

The results are similar to those of a vote from the UVic Faculty Association in January of this year, when 82 per cent of the association voted to become a certified union.

The ballot asked voters if they wanted “the Faculty Association of Simon Fraser University (SFUFA) to be recognized as a certified union, under the Labour Relations Code” and to have that body act as representative of faculty members and librarians in collective bargaining with the university.

Now that staff have officially given their go ahead on unionization, the next step is the issuing of a formal certification order by the Labour Relations Board of British Columbia. SFU administration and the newly formed SFUFA will then begin negotiating their first collective agreement.

A public release signed by VP Academic Jonathan Driver and SFUFA president Neil Abramson, stated that “The University Administration and Faculty Association respect the choice made by faculty members and librarians regarding their preferred form of representation.”

The release concluded, “Both the Administration and the Association are committed to maintaining the positive working relationship we have enjoyed.”

 

This story is currently developing and more details will be added as information becomes available. Please check back soon.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Read Next

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...