Home Blog Page 1391

Think Tank goes mobile

0

By David Dyck
The Simon Fraser Student Society’s (SFSS) student union building project is moving out of their central location in the Maggie Benson Centre to the halls of SFU in what it is calling the “mobile Think Tank”. The Think Tank was set up in mid-February to generate student input on a proposed student union building, supply information, and answer questions.

“Since not everyone can make it out to the Maggie Benson Centre, maybe it’s not accessible to everyone if they’re not in the area all the time,” said Build SFU ambassador Helen Chan. “The mobile Think Tank still provides information to students before the referendum but it allows us to take it around campus and promote that way.”

“The whole idea is that we’re reaching out to as many students as possible and the mobile Think Tank allows us to do that,” said SFSS president Jeff McCann.

A recent cost estimate put the price tag at $63,630,000 for the proposed SUB, which would be placed in the building where the pool currently sits. A referendum question will appear on the ballot in the upcoming general election, asking students if they want a levy instituted to support the project. Concerns have been raised about the cost of the project, and many departmental student unions have been having their meetings inside the Think Tank to discuss the issue of the levy. So far, the Chemistry Student Society, the Business Administration Student Society, and the Biology Student Union have formally endorsed Build SFU. Forum is meeting in two weeks to decide on whether or not to support the levy.

Students will see the mobile Think Tank around the Burnaby campus on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Theatre review: Ignorance

0

By Esther Tung
Photos by Jason Tsang

You may not have found the meaning of life, but Ignorance gives you all the right questions to ask

Bliss became elusive once our prefrontal cortexes outgrew ignorance. We spend our lives in search of happiness, but are prohibited by evolutionary design from stopping to smell the roses for too long. What is the meaning of life then — contentment itself, or the never-ending search for it? Or is it something else altogether?

Puppets, managed by a trio of shadowy men in button-up rompers, unfold the simple, yet evocative narrative of seeking the answer to the big question that has been plaguing humans since the evolution of sentient thought. In Discovery Channel documentary style, an omniscient narrator follows the first man and woman in their search for greener pastures, driven by their mutated cognizance of desire and imagination. The pair, created out of what appears to be a rock and some twigs, gibber at each other only in cave-talk, and indeed the puppeteers never say a real word the entire time, but create dialogue through non-verbal cues instead. Sentiments get lost once or twice in a squabble drawn out too long for comedy’s sake or just because it was a difficult one to convey, but the narrator keeps viewers focused on the big picture. The cave couple’s story thread wears thin towards the end of the play, though whimsical and dark snapshots from contemporaria are spliced in to keep the palette cleansed.

This is a story that can be told only by their puppets, which were all designed with care and attention to detail, but made with rough handling in mind. Old Trout employs comedic tricks that appeal to our more primitive side, which seems rather appropriate, though it comes off juvenile at times — puppets are intentionally knocked into things at stage exits or dropped from up high without warning.

Ignorance is not self-indulgent in its exploration of the theme, as it could easily have been, and encourages viewers to create their own meaning rather than pushing them in any one philosophical direction. Ignorance strikes that delicate balance between being light-hearted, yet thought-provoking, and does so without patronizing its audience.

Ignorance will be showing at the Cultch until March 10. Buy tickets here.

Petter Watch: March 5th

0

By Colin Sharp

Three Clan athletes earn GNAC end-of-season honours

0

By Adam Ovenell-Carter

The men’s and women’s basketball seasons could not have been more different. The women had a strong season from start to finish with only a few bumps on the road, while the men’s year was tumultuous, to say the least. The women made history by being the first Canadian school to win an NCAA playoff game, while the men probably got into the record books for most inactive players. The women’s season was the apple to the men’s moldy orange.

And although the two teams played drastically different seasons, there was one thing that tied them together: superstar performances from a few superstar players. Now, Justin Brown from the men’s side, and Nayo Raincock-Ekunwe and Kristina Collins from the women’s are being recognized by the GNAC for their incredible efforts this season.

Raincock-Ekunwe broke her own record this year by posting a near-unbelievable 22 double doubles. Considering the team played 27 games, that feat becomes all the more impressive. She finished second in the GNAC in points, but first in points-per-game; her 358 rebounds were first in the conference, and it wasn’t close (Seattle Pacific’s Nyesha Sims was second with 213). She was the proverbial immovable object for the Clan, borderline unstoppable around the hoop. There’s no doubt she’s the star of the team, if not the GNAC, and that wasn’t lost on her coach.

“Nayo is one of the best athletes in Division II basketball,” stated head coach Bruce Langford. “She has the ability to dominant games.”

As flattered as Raincock-
Ekunwe was to earn GNAC all-conference first-team honours, she wasn’t about to take all the credit herself.

“It’s a really big honour,” said Raincock-Ekunwe. “Being unanimously voted to be on the team from the other coaches feels great, but I think the team has improved a lot.  Our shooting is a lot better, our teamwork is better, we play together, and a lot of people have stepped up this year whereas last year two or three players scored most of the baskets.  Everyone came to play this year.”

One of those teammates who certainly came to play was point guard Kristina Collins. She didn’t make the GNAC first-team, but was given honourable mentions.
The secret’s out on Collins; one GNAC coach called her the best point guard in the league. She directs the offense, and her chemistry with Raincock-Ekunwe is undeniable. Her trademarked three-pointer is simply clutch, and has won games for the Clan.

“In my mind Kristina is more than an honourable mention,” added Langford. “She certainly is to our team.  She is an integral part of our offence and much of what she does goes unnoticed.  She led the league in threes and hit many of them at key times.”

In a season full of bright spots, these two shone brilliantly among the rest.

And while the men experienced a season of turmoil, Justin Brown was one key reason the team got as far as they did. He led the team (and finished fourth in the conference) with 17.6 points per game, and finished seventh in the GNAC in steals. He was a spark plug for a sputtering Clan engine, and despite a rough season, he graduates from the program on a high note.

“It feels good to be recognized and to know that my hard work on and off the court
paid off,” said Brown of his GNAC all-conference second-team honours.

“I certainly couldn’t have had success without the coaches and my teammates so I’m just really happy for
my whole team and the whole school.”

It’s a nice bit of light shed
on an otherwise pretty dark season for the men’s side, though things do look brighter as the team begins to prepare for next year.

Regardless, Brown, along with Raincock-Ekunwe and Collins, were special players for
their respective teams, and earned every bit of their newfound recognition.

Hodgson’s departure hardly a loss for the Canucks

0

By Adam Ovenell-Carter

The 2012 NHL trade deadline was unofficially known as “Rick Nash Watch”, as the superstar winger was placed on the market by the floundering Columbus Blue Jackets. However, he wasn’t dealt, and as a result, Monday’s biggest shocker was the trade that sent former Canuck Cody Hodgson to the Buffalo Sabres for big Zack Kassian.

This season, Cody Hodgson emerged as one of the league’s hottest rookies despite playing limited minutes. Since his junior hockey days, Hodgson has been a star. He was the Canadian Hockey League player of the year in 2009 and he also led Canada to a gold medal victory at the 2009 World Junior Hockey Championships. But his development as an NHL star has been anything but smooth.

Prior to the Canucks’ training camp in 2009, the Canucks medical staff had apparently misdiagnosed Hodgson’s back injury from his training during the off-season. As a result, Hodgson decided to seek alternative medical options regarding his back after being cut from training camp. This created a media-instigated conflict between Hodgson and the Canucks coaching staff after head coach Alain Vigneault called the young centre out for what he believed to be an excuse for his poor play that led to him being cut.

Eventually Hodgson recovered from his injury and participated in the Canucks’ training camp last season. Although he did not make the team, he began the season playing for the Canucks’ farm team, then the Manitoba Moose. Hodgson was eventually called up late last season and was a part of the Canucks playoff run.

This season, playing limited minutes, Hodgson has been challenging for his place as rookie of the year. He has shown Vancouver fans that he may have had the most natural skillset on the team.

Although Hodgson had success this season, he continued to struggle to find a place on this team. With Henrik Sedin and Ryan Kesler ahead of him on the depth chart, the ice time was not going to increase. For more ice time, Hodgson would have to play on the wing but it’s not as easy as switching positions as it is in say, NHL 12. He is most comfortable and natural at the center position, but he wasn’t going to get a chance to shine there in Vancouver. Now, he’ll get that chance in Buffalo.

Many fans were outraged at the deal, but the trade ironically responds to what every Canucks fan has wanted since last year’s Stanley Cup defeat: someone to keep the Milan Lucic’s of the world honest. In Zack Kassian, the Canucks received a young power-forward who is tough and has the skills to become a premiere goal scorer, a la Todd Bertuzzi circa 2003. Kassian is no scrub; he is a former first-round pick and is a year younger than Hodgson. And if you need a reason to care about him, just remember it took Cody Hodgson to get him

With an almost guaranteed top three position in the Western Conference standings, the new acquisitions of Kassian, Sami Pahlsson, and Marc-Andre Gragnani are answers to the short-term needs of the Canucks in preparation of another deep playoff run. Pahlsson is more than capable of slotting in for Hodgson’s vacant spot. And, with Kassian’s toughness, Byron Bitz, and Dale Weise may be pushed out of the regular line-up in favour
of the young forward with a bit more scoring touch. As well, Gragnani adds depth to the defense core.

What remains to be seen are the long-term consequences of this trade. Sure, Hodgson was not going to take ice time away from Henrik Sedin and Ryan Kesler but what about in a few years?

Kesler is still young but with the gritty and rugged style that he plays, he is more prone to injuries than Henrik Sedin. It would not be a surprise if Kesler’s play deteriorates sooner than later. The Canucks got what they needed for the present, but what will define this deal is how each player pans out for their new teams.

However, if the Canucks win the Stanley Cup in the next few years, it’s safe to say the Canucks would have made the right decision trading away Hodgson.

Renney earns 500th win

0

By Adam Ovenell-Carter

Entering the year with a lot of promise and just as much intrigue, the 2012 edition of the Clan softball team is off to a fantastic start. The team, at the time of press, is rolling along with an 8–1 record and a perfect 4–0 mark in the GNAC. They’ve outscored opponents 61–35 and are at, or near the top of almost every statistical category. Still, none of those figures could be classified as the story of the season. That honour would belong to head coach Mike Renney, who earned his 500th career collegiate victory last week.

The big win came in a two-game sweep of Western Washington University last week at home on Beedie Field. In that sweep, the Clan rolled over the WWU Wolves 11–1 before besting them 7–5 in the second half of the doubleheader. Those two wins have helped the Clan move right into top spot in the GNAC.

Buoyed by solid pitching from former walk-on wonder Cara Lukawesky and strong hitting through the lineup, the Clan mercied the Wolves and ended the first game in just five innings, giving Renney 499 wins and a chance to earn the milestone in the second match.

The second match, as the score would indicate, was much more competitive. The Clan hopped out to a 5–1 lead, but sophomore pitcher Kelsie Hawkins got herself into some hot water when she loaded the bases in the sixth inning. With the potential go-ahead run at the plate, Renney made a decision to bring Lukawesky back in. The Clan’s lead quickly disappeared, but Lukawesky at least got them out of the inning tied at five apiece. It would be Brittany Ribeiro who would play hero, as she cranked a two-run home run in the top of the seventh to give the Clan the lead, more than enough room for Lukawesky to work with to seal the game.

“It’s big to beat Western Washington,” said Renney of the two victories. “They were one of the top teams in the GNAC last year and . . . they were still ranked ahead of us in the preseason.”

But it was his coaching decision to put Lukawesky into the second game that arguably saved the game and earned him his impressive 500th win. It’s those types of tough decisions which more often than not end up being the right ones,that put Renney in the position to reach his incredible milestone. He’s had 499 others before it, but this one,he’ll savour.

“They all add up pretty quick, it was good to get the monkey off the back early in the season,” said Renney.  “I’ll probably remember that one for awhile.  The athletes played well today and I’m happy for them.

“They deserved to win,” he added. But if anyone deserved the win, it was the man in the dugout, cheering them on.

Clan make history with first-ever NCAA playoff win

0

By Adam Ovenell-Carter

An apology, for at the time of writing, the Clan women’s basketball team’s post-season has yet to be finished. However, with one playoff victory in the books, the Clan have already made history. With their 69–61 victory over the Seattle Pacific University Falcons on Thursday night, the Clan have recorded the team’s first-ever NCAA playoff victory, and are the first Canadian team to ever win an NCAA playoff game.

The team never trailed, but as has been the case all year long, someone new stepped up with so much on the line. It had been Chelsea Resit in the past, along with the continued impressive outings from Nayo Raincock-Ekunwe and Kristina Collins, but this time, Carla Wyman emerged to help the team make history.

“Carla had one of the best games of her career,” said head coach Bruce Langford. It couldn’t have come at a better time.

Wyman finished second on the team in both points (16) and rebounds (seven), but her biggest play unquestionably came with under 90 seconds to play. With the Clan up by just four points, the third-year guard hit a three-pointer to put the team up seven with time running out.

“I had an open look and I just took it,” said a very matter-of-fact Wyman. She may have played it off, but there was no denying the magnitude of her shot that punctuated the Clan’s late lead. SFU would only
build on that lead to earn themselves a bout with top-ranked Alaska Anchorage.

Raincock-Ekunwe had already rewritten history with a GNAC-record 22 double-doubles in the regular season, and she was her usual dominant self against Seattle Pacific as well. She finished with 20 points and 12 rebounds, and along with Wyman was the driving force of the Clan’s historic effort.

“We knew we had a chance to advance in a lose-and-you’re-out situation,” said Wyman. “it was a bit of a roller coaster game but we ended up pulling it off.”

With barely 24 hours to turn around and take on the GNAC’s top team, it’s easy to understand how the significance of the win could be lost on the team; they’ve not been a team to pay attention to stats and records, either. Nevertheless, the Clan have made history, in a couple different ways. They’ve set the bar high for next season, but with almost their entire team returning, there’s not much stopping this squad from being next year’s Alaska Anchorage.

Celebration of past shines light on future

0

By Adam Ovenell-Carter

“I think the future is unlimited,” said SFU athletics director Milton Richards on SFU athletics’ outlook. “When you look throughout SFU’s history, at all the people here, I think it proves that.”

By ‘here’, Richards is referring to the SFU Athletics Hall of Fame induction ceremony that took place last Wednesday at the Diamond Alumni Centre. And the people he was referring to, well, where to begin.

SFU’s athletics Hall of Fame is already full of big names, such as football’s Lui Passaglia and basketball’s Jay Triano. And for the first time in almost two decades, more were finally, and deservedly, added to the ranks.

The 2012 inductee class consisted of nine athletes, three coaches, and two teams, highlighted by the likes of Daniel Igali, Brit Townsend and Doug Brown. As much as the ceremony was to honour each individual (or team) accomplishment, it was just as much an opportunity to reflect and appreciate the unheralded tradition and history of SFU athletics.

Each inductee was called to stage by Giulio Caravatta — a former Clansmen and CFL quarterback who is now the colour commentator for the B.C. Lions — received a plaque, and moved on, and while that was naturally the main event, it seemed more like a formality. The heart of the ceremony came before and after, as new and old members of the Hall of Fame and SFU athletics shared laughs, stories, and even dessert. This was not about each person as they crossed the stage individually, it was about them all together on the other side.

“That’s always been the thing about SFU, its incredible sense of community,” said Doug Brown, the massive six-foot-eight Winnipeg Blue Bomber. “That alone helped me prepare for my professional career, knowing it was never just about me.

“The program as a whole helped me. I knew I could get a top education here that would benefit me whether I made it big or not, and still play against top competition. Now I’m always drawn in. Every time I come out here, whether it’s to play against the Lions or see my family, I take one day to come back up here. They’ve been unbelievable keeping me involved, and now I’ve been able to give back by lending some of my experiences.

“That’s one of the things about being a member of Clan athletics — it’s that you’re always a member. When you look at the other names on this list [of inductees], it’s just humbling to be nominated and included in such a prestigious group,” conceded Brown.

But it’s exactly that tradition of humility and prestige that Richards is trying to foster, and he believes events such as this one will be a great start. In fact, bringing back the Hall of Fame was one of the first things he wanted to change when he was brought on as the athletics director just a few months ago.

“One of the first meetings I had here was with [SFU’s first athletic director and former Hall of Fame inductee] Lorne Davies, and we right away set out to bring this back. Any
opportunity I had, especially as the new guy on board, to embrace the tradition of SFU athletics is an even better opportunity for the program. I don’t think we celebrate our success enough, and
this shows just how great it is, and has been.”

If nothing else, such a celebration shows just how formidable SFU athletics can be. And if the past is any indicator of what could come, then the future could very well be unlimited.

Of straw men and Straw Dogs

0

By Will Ross

In my first column, I said I wouldn’t limit discussion of remakes to whether they are “better” or “worse”. This is partly because I think that most filmic reiterations are harmless. Even when they’re poorly made, their heart is more often than not in the same place as their forerunners, or at worst they’re no worse than vapid. There are special cases, however, when I object to remakes that reinterpret sensitive material in a morally irresponsible way.

Enter Straw Dogs vs. Straw Dogs. The original 1971 film by Sam Peckinpah was a radically nihilistic take on the psychology of violence. Its plot is often mistaken for a slow-burn thriller, but it’s actually a domestic-drama demolition: Wussy mathematician David Summer and his attractive wife Amy flee the protest culture of America to the latter’s hometown, an English village. The locals, one of whom is an old flame of Amy’s, begin to intimidate the couple, leading to a breakdown of relations between wife, who demands that David confront the villagers, and husband, who seems passive on the matter.

But the film’s real purpose is to annihilate first impressions of this spat when the conflict becomes violent. Straw Dogs’s complicated victimhood comes to a head in its infamous rape scene. Some of the local antagonists invite David hunting, then abandon him. Amy’s ex-lover takes advantage of David’s predicament by finding and forcing himself on her. The scene has two disturbing wrinkles: first, it intercuts with David in the wilderness, apparently disinterested in finding his way home, and, by implication, complicit in the rape; second, Amy seems to be at least partially enjoying the rape, though afterwards she is traumatized.

Peckinpah makes it clear that he doesn’t believe that women generally enjoy rape: another villager soon arrives and rapes her as well, and this time Amy is obviously miserable throughout. It’s an extremely unpleasant sequence, but a daring and ultimately responsible one. Peckinpah knows these acts are despicable, and though he doesn’t blame the victims, he acknowledges that violence is closely tied to interpersonal relationships, and suggests that its appeal as a tool for sublimation makes it impossible to eradicate.

What makes Rod Lurie’s 2011 remake so reprehensible is its commitment to its potential as entertainment over duty to its subject matter. In his version, David is actively looking for a way out of the forest, and Amy is inarguably suffering throughout the entire rape. When the second rapist arrives, Lurie foregoes showing the act by fading out the sounds of the assault over a close-up of the other. Consequently, the rape ultimately reveals nothing. It only serves as ‘drama’, to ‘raise the emotional stakes’. In other words, it’s exploitation.

To respond to an honest, complex psychological dialogue of a sensitive issue with soft peddling is to cheapen both the discourse and the subject at hand. Lurie has said that Amy’s momentary enjoyment of rape ruined the original Straw Dogs, and that removing it makes his film the better of the two, but he’s got it the wrong way around. When a difficult and disturbing subject is seriously explored, it’s arrogant and immoral to ostensibly ‘improve’ it by playing it safe for the sake of enjoyment. Such gratuitously tame treatment of rape must not be allowed to masquerade as feminist revisionism.