Home Blog Page 1316

Observatory project moves forward

1

observatory-PAMR

By David Dyck
Image courtesy of PAMR

Instead of going by the DAC, the building will now be put in a much more high profile location

In 2010, the university unveiled plans to build an observatory on the Burnaby campus. It was originally meant to go up next to the Diamond Alumni Centre, as pictured, but according to Dr. Howard Trottier, physics professor and host of the popular “Starry Nights @ SFU” program, the plans have since changed significantly.

“What largely changed was that someone pointed out that this program is largely for kids who come on campus,” Trottier told The Peak. If the observatory is on the north slope, it is a problem because that isn’t an area where you really get to see the university. “That’s a really big part of the experience, that they see what university life is like.”

The project has been split into two different parts: the observatory and a daytime class- room space, the two of which do not necessarily have to be in the same location.

Although Trottier was not able to disclose where the location for the new building will be, he did say, “the observatory is now a standalone structure which will go in a very exciting, very high profile spot,” that students will see every day.

“A thousand students will pass it every day, and everyone at SFU will have access to equipment as good as, or better, than the observatory at the Vancouver Space Centre,” said AJ Koenig, an SFU undergraduate student who is a member of the SFU Astron- omy Club.

“Given Vancouver’s light pollution, the facility will not be making new research, but will be making new astronomers. And if enough people get involved, we may find SFU pressured into building a larger astronomy faculty,” he added. Currently there is no astronomy department at SFU, though the physics depart- ment offers some undergradu- ate classes that may appeal to stargazers.

Originally the observatory project was budgeted at four million dollars. With changes to the project came a new price tag: two million dollars, which an anonymous donor agreed to pay in full. Details are also hazy as for when the structure will begin construction. “The vague timeline is that things are moving ahead, and the project should be made public soon,” said Trottier.

But he was adamant that although he couldn’t give many details on the project at this time, it was a sure thing. “There’s absolutely no turning back now. It’s coming.” “It’s built up a lot of awareness, a lot of support from all kinds of people, all walks of life on campus and off campus, so that reservoir of goodwill is really huge, and we’ll tap into it soon,” he added.

Trottier is the host of Starry Nights @ SFU, a program that brings people of all ages up to Burnaby mountain for stargazing. It started in 2009, and gained immediate popularity. The program is geared specifi- cally towards children, but in- cludes many SFU students.

Trottier credited a lesser-known program on campus for much of Starry Night’s success: Science in Action, created by SFU chemistry professor Sophie Lavieri. “It’s a community thing that may have grown within SFU but to have the community engaged in this way, would not exist without science in action,” he said.

According to Trottier, the classroom space will work with the observatory to enhance a program that is “broader than just a university observatory.”

“You won’t find another program like this in Canada once it’s up and running,” said Trottier. There are even plans to have a video link to schools outside the lower mainland, so that they may book time to op- erate it remotely.

“It’s not just the observatory, it’s the whole science outreach program that drives the scale of it. It’ll be a first in that way, there’s no university science centre like it. There are things of that nature in the States, but not in Canada.”

Walking and cycling riskier than driving: study

0

WEB-Transit- Ben Derochie copy

By Amara Janssens
Photos by Mark Burnham

Pedestrians and cyclists have a higher rate of injury and fatality than drivers and passengers

In a time when everyone is being asked to reduce their carbon footprint, British Columbians are often urged to use modes of transportation other than driving. However, according to a new study by a health science researcher at Simon Fraser University, driving is in fact a safer mode of transportation over walking or biking in BC. Dr. Meghan Winters, an associate professor in the faculty of Health Sciences, studied the different injury and fatality rates for various modes of transportation.

The study found that pedestrians and cyclists had a higher rate of injury and fatality than drivers an passengers. Additionally, walking and cycling shared a similar risk rate. Dr. Winters explained, “Some people talk about bikers and pedestrians being vulnerable road users, and our data certainly confirms that they were vulnerable road users.”

According to a public safety bulletin by the BC Coroner Service, 221 pedestrians have been killed in this province from 2008–2012. Fatalities most often occurred during lunchtime and peak commuting times in the morning and afternoon, and in intersections. Additionally, seniors “aged 70 or over were at a significant higher risk than those in younger age groups,” the bulletin stated.

Although more people are killed each year as vehicle occu- pants, that figure does not indi- cate the risk level with this mode of transportation. “When you look at the numbers you see that more people are killed each year as drivers and passengers, but that is burden, and doesn’t talk about risk,” Dr. Winters explained.

Dr. Winters compared traffic injury and fatality rates between Canada and other similar coun- tries, like the United States, the Netherlands and Belgium. “What we found was that the crude traf- fic fatality rate in Canada is much higher than it is many other coun- tries, one of these being the Netheerlands, which we found to have the lowest rates.”

The findings indicate that Canada could drastically improve traffic safety since other similar countries have much safer rates. According to Dr. Winters, if traffic fatality rates for walking, cycling and biking from the Netherlands are applied to BC data, “we would in fact reduce traffic fatalities by 200 per year, which is a reduction about half of the current traffic fa- talities we are currently seeing,” she explained.

The risks of walking, biking and driving in British Columbia were very similar to data from the United States, and were all shown to have a moderate level of risk. Dr. Winters’ team examined the risk of other modes of transpor- tation in the United States, and applied those findings to Canada. “We can assume that transit travel and motorcycle travel is not substantially different.”

Motorcycle and public transit were found to have drastically different risk levels than the other modes. When compared to biking, walking and driving, “Transit travel was about 25 times safer than any of the other modes in terms of risk for injury and fatality,” Dr. Winters concluded.

However, there was a significant increase in risk with motorcycle travel, which “was 20 to 25 times more dangerous than the other modes,” Dr. Winters found. “It is an extremely dangerous choice . . . the data certainly confirms that motorcycle travel is not the safest way to do that, by far.”

Although the study found that there is moderate risk asso- ciated with walking and cycling, Dr. Winters does not recommend British Columbians give up these activities. “The physical benefits of walking and cycling far outweigh the injury risk.”

When asked what mode of transportation she would recom- mend, Dr. Winter’s replied, “The clear answer is public transit . . . [it] is both safe and it’s been shown that people walk more who use public transit, so it’s healthy as well.”

There are many reasons why traffic is safer in other countries than it is in Canada. For example, in many European countries, the cities are designed for walking and cycling, making driving more cumbersome.

“The Netherlands has extensive pathways that are separated from traffic, so that will reduce your traffic injury and fa- tality rate, certainly,” Dr. Winters explained. Additionally, Europe does not see the same amount of large vehicles as seen in North America, which play a role in traffic injuries and fatalities.

Dr. Winters recommends that municipalities, “provide separation from motor vehicle traffic,” as is done in Europe. She also recommends that individuals take responsibility to reduce risk while walking and cycling, such as wearing bright clothing, or reflective vests at night. Additionally, the BC Coroners Service suggests pedestrians stay alert, and to not assume that a crosswalk or green light makes you safe.

Researchers test new anti-influenza drug

0

By Kristina Charania

The compound may prove to be more effective than any other drug on the market

SFU virologist Masahiro Niikura and PhD student Nicole Bance have collaborated with researchers from Australia, the United Kingdom, and local institutions to test the flu-con-trolling capacity of a new anti- influenza drug.

The team is headed by enzymologists and chemists at UBC who first synthesized the new compound. Positive results were achieved from test tube ex- periments and as a result, Bance and Niikura ran a series of ani- mal model tests which also pro- duced very promising results.

“We gave mice this new drug and then infected them with influenza to see if they were protected against the virus. All of them survived, which was good,” said Bance. The group’s research will be published in the journal Science, and it became available online in Sci- ence Express in late February.

In order to increase the number of infected cells in an organism, the influenza virus must leave an infected cell to attack healthy cells. A viral enzyme or a large molecule that speeds up chemical reac- tions and helps specific units bind-called nuramidase helps influenza escape the cell by processing sialic acid, a sim- ple sugar on the cell surface. If another substance tightly binds to nuramidase, the virus cannot exit infected cells because the enzyme can no longer digest the acid.

The new drug is designed to form an almost irreversible covalent bond to nuramidase in order to block it from bonding to sialic acid. Because the new compound is more structurally similar to sialic acid than other nuramidase inhibitor drugs, it will be less prone to generating resistant influenza strains and an ideal choice for future anti- influenza drugs.

The compound carries the advantages of two exist- ing nuramidase inhibitors on the market: Tamiflu and Relenza. Tamiflu is popular with physicians because it is water-soluble and available orally, but overuse has promoted the emergence of Tamiflu-resistant influenza strains.

In contrast, Relenza is effective against most Tamiflu-resis- tant viruses and administered through a nasal spray. “The new compound combines the ad- vantages of Relenza with Tami-flu, so it will be orally available and effective against Tamiflu resistant strains,” said Bance.

Ultimately, anti-influenza drugs like the one tested by Nii- kura and Bance buy more time for vaccine production. Because clinically isolated viruses quickly kill the embryonated chicken eggs they are produced in, weakened viruses must be created in order to produce high amounts of viruses ready for vaccines. This process can take a month or longer, accord- ing to Niikura.

Anti-influenza drugs directly alter the activities of nuramidase, making them effective against both old and new influenza strains unlike vaccines. “Because the required muta- tions are different, anti-viral drugs and vaccines can compliment each other.” said Bance. “This could be effective when used with currrent drugs to re- duce the impact of a pandemic caused by emerging strains.”

Planning the DTES

0

peak dtes

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by Leah Bjornson

Plans for 18 new development projects between Carrall Street and the base of Burnaby Mountain have created hope for a revival along East Hastings, one of the poorest and most notorious streets in Canada. However, for some, this new development may not be a welcomed change.

SFU students may have already noticed the new condos, businesses, and other buildings springing up along this strip during their daily commute up Burnaby Mountain. Since 2007, 25 building projects have been completed along East Hastings. These developments have added 423,533 square feet of residential space and 206,956 square feet of commercial space to the area.

Despite its appearance today, the Downtown Eastside (DTES) neighbourhood was once an economic and industrial hub of Vancouver. Once termed the “Great White Way” because of its neon displays, the infamous street was home to the city hall, the courthouse, the Carnegie Library, the BC Electric Railway Company, and Woodward’s de- partment store.

“What you’ve got is layers upon layers of history,” said Gordon Price, director of the City Program at SFU and six-term Vancouver city councillor. “East Hastings was really Gastown, where the sawmill was. Bars and hotels gathered around the area to provide essential services for the workers and visitors to the city. Even when the city-centre moved to Granville in the 1920s, the Downtown Eastside main- tained its purpose as a place for sawmill workers. It was still a major city centre, even as its pop- ulation declined in income.”

After Vancouver’s city-centre moved to Granville, a new, low- income population moved into the DTES area. This migration was followed by the arrival of new drugs, which spurred the creation of services in the area such as the needle exchange and the Union Mission Gospel, which in turn attracted more poor, struggling individuals. This chain of events led to East Hastings metamorphosis from a historical and cultural centre into Vancouver’s very own “skid row.”

Now, the Vancouver City Council is looking to revitalise the area with new developments. One of these is SFU’s acclaimed School for the Contemporary Arts, which relocated downtown to a new building in the historic Woodward’s district in Septem- ber 2010. Dr. Michael Stevenson, then President and Vice-Chan- cellor of Simon Fraser University, commented at the time: “We celebrate the move of SFU’s School for the Contempo- rary Arts to Woodward’s as participants in this great project of social and urban transformation in the heart of Vancouver’s Down- town Eastside. We are here not as an elite educational institution, opportunistically seeking its own advantage, but as partners in this most challenged and challenging part of our community.”

Nevertheless, not everyone is on board with this urban transformation. Critics worry that new development would lead to gentrification of the last af- fordable neighbourhood in the city for impoverished and low income citizens.

Price describes the conundrum faced by the city councillors as a catch-22, in which neither option really solves the problem. “Critics argue that the area should remain as it is,” describes Price. “But this also creates an en- vironment and market for the drug trade. The policy to keep develop- ment out of East Hastings is one of preserved dysfunction.

He continued, “But these impoverished areas exist in every city in the world. If it needs to be somewhere, this is the place.” Solutions for the problem of affordable social housing include a proposal for a 14-storey rental building at 41 East Hastings. Sixty per cent of the planned 169 housing units are slated to rent for below- market rates, with 52 units reserved specifically for women.

Even still, Price speculated that projects such as this may not be enough to reverse the tide of change enveloping the neighbourhood. “Cities are organic,” says Price. “Our tendency as a culture is to plan and lock in ideas if they benefit us, but cities must always be responsive to change. You can’t control everything, and to some degree you don’t want to.”

BC Liberal minister of advanced education steps down

0

By Laura Rodgers

VANCOUVER (CUP) — The BC Liberal minister of advanced education, John Yap, has stepped aside from cabinet over the fallout from a leaked internal party memo.

Yap has been the minister of advanced education since September 2012, and has also served as the minister of state for multiculturalism since March 2012.

His removal from cabinet comes as a response to a Liberal document that described the use of government resources to reach out to ethnic voters in the lead-up to this spring’s provincial election. The document indicated that apologies for historical wrongs upon certain ethnic groups should be issued in the run-up to the election to achieve “quick wins” on the campaign trail.

Although Yap was not the minister of state for multiculturalism in January 2012, which is when the memo is dated, he will step aside from both of his cabinet positions until the Liberals conclude an investigation into their ethnic votes strategy.

“When mistakes occur, and they do, we must confront them and take responsibility for them. I’ve talked to [John Yap], and he has agreed that he is going to step aside from cabinet,” said premier Christy Clark in question period on Monday afternoon. NDP leader Adrian Dix spoke in question period to say he supported Yap’s decision to step aside during the investigation.

Ralph Sultan, MLA for West Vancouver–Capilano and current minister of state for seniors, has been temporarily appointed to take over the ministry of advanced education. Staff at Sultan’s legislature office said that they learned Sultan would be taking over the ministry on the day the announcement was made.

University Briefs – March 11, 2013

0

By Amara Janssens

Alberta professor charged with sexual assault and confinement of 16 year old girl

On Feb. 14, Zhixiang Wang, an associate professor at the University of Alberta, was arrested and charged with one count of sexual assault, and one count of sexual interference. His wife, Xinmei Chen, is also facing charges over one count unlawful confinement of a minor. The charges the two face were all allegedly committed against one 16-year old girl who is reported to have been confined for nearly three years. The couple both worked in the department of medicinal Genetics at U of A, and have since both have been placed on leave. They are both scheduled to appear in court Mar. 13.

With files from The Gateway

 

Taking the stink out of hockey equipment

Two recent business graduates from the University of Saskatchewan, Dan Robinson and Chad Fischl, have found a solution to remove bad odor causing bacteria from sports equipment, such as hockey gear and gym bags. The pair came up with a deodorizing spray that uses silver, a natural antibacterial, that has been untouched in the marketplace. “We searched for a natural antibacterial and found silver. We found that nobody was really doing it in a product like that and really there were barely any products out there that [used] silver,” Robinson told The Sheaf. Their product, Shoutout, is now being sold across the country.

With files from The Sheaf

 

Aboriginal law program at the University of Windsor?

Students at the University of Windsor initiated a proposal to have an aboriginal law program open at the school. The students originally set out to help aboriginal people within the community of Windsor, but were unable to achieve the level of success they had hoped. Determined, the students set out a proposal to have a law school address aboriginal issues and rights. “We realized that a specialization program at Windsor could actually be more relevant,” Caitlin Beresford, an initiator of the proposal, told The Lance. According to Beresford, only a handful of Canadian law schools offer the opportunity to specialize in aboriginal law. The law school is currently in early stages of curriculum development.

With files from The Lance.

 

Students: disengaged

0

Celebrity City

By Estefania Duran
Photos by Mark Burnham

A university that doesn’t prioritize student involvement will never be truly “engaged”

It was little over a year ago that SFU changed its slogan from “Thinking of the world” to the more active “Engaging the world.” Aiming for a slogan that was more dynamic was certainly a nice concept. However, before the univer- sity sets out to engage with the world, it should do a better job engaging its own students.

During the last three years, I have been involved with different clubs, student campaigns, frosh events, student unions, student government, etc. My university experience had felt incomplete, but as soon as I got involved, I was surrounded by students who were trying to make a difference and improve everyone’s univer- sity experience; I was happy to be one of them.

Unfortunately, this also meant I was immersed in SFU’s bureaucracy. This is when I realized that SFU’s tagline was just that, only a tagline. Countless times I saw motivated students run into obstacles put forth by the university, only to later see them return from their attempts with a defeated attitude.

Students are volunteering countless hours of their time, trying to find a balance between school, volunteering, and work, while the university seems more concerned with engaging the outside world than making their efforts easier. I have met so many fantastic and truly inspirational students whose volunteer work not only goes unacknowledged, but is made more difficult by the university itself.

Take the SFSS elections: the Simon Fraser Student Society is the largest student government on campus, providing essential services and administering all of our student unions and clubs. You’d think that such an important event would be the university’s priority, but instead of motivating professors to remind students in lectures about the elections, or allowing candidates to advocate the importance of voting in classes, the university ignores student affairs.

There have been times where voting turnout has been as low as 5.23 per cent, despite continuous efforts from candidates. I am by no means blaming the university alone, but the well being of university students should be a collaborative affair. It is important for students to perceive the university’s involvement.

The example above is only the tip of the iceberg. There are many ways in which the university can motivate and support its students; for example, small academic journal launches or student conferences, which do not require much monetary support. I understand that perhaps the university might not always have the necessary resources, but if they cannot help financially, personal support goes a long way.

Support from the university does not only mean being present at events, but also meeting with students and listening to what they have to say. After two years of continuous attempts by the largest faculty student union at SFU to meet with the dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, their efforts have led nowhere. One would think that meeting with such a large student body to discuss present issues would be a priority.

There are endless examples of situations in which students attempt to reach out and explore their possibilities, only to be turned down. But it does not have to be this way. Little steps can go a long way, and administration becoming a caring presence will do more for this university than it realizes. The purpose of this article is not to state all that is wrong with SFU; rather it is an invitation for SFU to notice the great effort many of its talented students make.

If the university is truly serious about making a change and setting up a precedent, not all is lost. It is vital for the university to understand that the attitude most students have towards SFU is similar to that of their administration, uncaring and indifferent. If students notice a university that is supportive and involved, their attitude will change as well. However, if SFU does not acknowledge this problem, it will continue to lose motivated students who get tired of talking to a worldly-engaged wall.

Out of This World: Why Space is So Fucking Cool

0

By Chris Apps

Do you remember playing the “why” game with the grown- ups of your life? Why is the sky blue? Why can’t I have a purple kitty? Why is uncle putting a “rug” on his head? Odds are, you are no longer this child-like inquisitor. But, in having assumed your new “all-knowing” role, you have likely learned an important lesson: sometimes you just don’t know, and sometimes the best answer is simply “Because that’s the way it is.”

This is especially true of space, which has recently been in the news quite a bit: astronaut Chris Hadfield is now aboard the International Space Station (ISS), and will soon be the first Canadian to assume command; the first Canadian in space, former astronaut Marc Garneau, is running for leadership of the Liberals; feasibility studies for asteroid mining are popping up with greater frequency; and just last week, SpaceX ’s privately operated Dragon Spacecraft completed its fifth payload delivery to ISS. As a space enthusiast, I’m losing my shit. But a big part of my appreciation for all this doesn’t come from our interactions with space, but rather space itself. What follows is my attempt to explain a few of the cooler mysteries and some bits of physics that make everything out of this world so incredible.

The Beginning: The Big Thing?

While scientists have been smart enough to avoid esoteric philosophical questions concerning why we and everything we know exists, nothing has stopped them from seeking out how. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, or confined to some weird religious compound, you’ve heard of the dominant theory: the Big Bang.

Prior to this cataclysmic event — about 15 billion years ago — there was not a whole lot going on in our universe. As far as we know, literally nothing existed. No chemicals, no minerals, no gas clouds, nada. Suddenly, the energy of a fiery explosion became the first thing to come into being. From this heat, space erupted, and from the explosion, everything was created.

The conditions for energy, matter, and even time itself had become tangible from a state of nothingness. If it’s difficult to wrap your mind around the notion that the forces and dimensions governing physics at one time were not there, you are not alone. In fact, if you can wrap your mind around that shit, you might be one of a kind. The creation of these forces, particularly gravity, led to the accumulation of atoms, which formed very dense clouds of gas called nebulae. These gave birth to stars, stars to planets, and so on.

Descriptions of this supposed explosion are vague, mainly because it’s all an assumption: we don’t know for sure there was nothing before the big bang, and it’s pretty hard to explain what exactly it was that became hot and dense enough to explode in the first place.

This has lead to a great deal of argument and a bunch of other theories including the possibility of another universe existing prior to ours. But I could argue that our existence can be chalked up to a unicorn fart, and no one could really prove otherwise.

There actually is some pretty solid evidence supporting the big bang theory. Through observing the light emitted from distant galaxies and quasars, Edwin Hubble found that their wavelengths were shifting to the red end of the light spectrum — “redshifting” — indicating they are receding from the Earth.

This would suggest the universe is continually expanding. A good analogy then, is to think of the universe as an ever-inflating balloon, with us inside. This would suggest a point of origin, and thus a theoretical location for a big bang to have occurred. Light and microwave emissions as well as the distribution of galaxies have also been found to provide corroborating evidence.

Even if you don’t want to dwell on the past, you might question the future. How far can it all expand, and how long will we be able to enjoy the ride? A more ridiculous and equally legitimate question is whether there is a threshold to our existence, and whether or not there is going to be anything beyond it. Maybe there are a thousand more universes with a thousand more yous and mes wondering the same questions.

Going the Distance: Space Time
I’m not brazen enough to assume I can explain or even understand all the intricacies of space-time, but I can certainly attempt to paint the picture. One may recall how Douglas Adams’ Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy describes the cosmos: “Space . . . is big. Really big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.” With space being so big, how do we measure it? Mere kilometres are not enough; rather, we use the light year — the distance traveled by light in one year.

Alpha Centauri, one of Earth’s closest stars, is super far away. Like, over 40 trillion kilometres far away. So, traveling at a con- stant speed of 1079 million km/h, it takes that light 4.37 years to hit our eyeballs from when it is originally emitted. That’s the closest one! Even using the most advanced technology available, it would still take us five million years to get there.

Space is big, to the point that there is no real frame of reference. If you can fit four earths into the storm on Jupiter, there is no point in using planetary units to describe size on this scale. Light takes up to 100,000 years to travel across our galaxy; this is a spectacularly huge neighbourhood, and what’s more incredible is that there are billions and billions of galaxies.

I am not pretending to be some sort of expert here. I’m just a dude who is really stoked on space. It’s pretty damned cool, after all. I have often heard from people that thinking about this stuff makes them feel depressed or even a little scared.

While this might stem from the realization that we are less than fly shit on a star map, I have personally found deep comfort in this insignificance. When the universe is that big, the difference between your B+ and your A- seems pretty petty.

The next time you look up at night, think about how many years that bright blue dot has been traveling to reach you. Then consider this: since that light is a constant and was emitted sometime a hundred thousand years ago, you are effectively looking back through fucking time.

Our Home: The Planets
Sure, space is neat-o, but one could just as easily write about how simply awesome humanity is. We have grown up here, we have evolved here, and our recourse has been to spread about in hopes of finding enough room for all of us. But — and this is a pretty sizable “but” — this development didn’t start with some monkey, or even some ugly-ass fish that crawled out of a bubbling swamp. It started with our very platform, our growth medium: the planet.

Ever wondered how planets form? So have scientists, and those crazy bastards have come up with something called the nebular hypothesis. The process starts with a star being born. This happens in a nebulous cloud, which is pretty much a huge clump of hydrogen and carbon monoxide gases.

The matter in the cloud slowly combines into clumps, getting heavier and heavier. It gets so heavy that it begins to collapse, heating the hydrogen through the increase in pressure, and igniting the star. There is a boom, and the new star is left with a “proto-planetary disc” around it, which are essentially super-hot bands of water and hydrogen compounds. Up to this point, the process has taken
100 million years.

As they spin around the star, elements and minerals start to glob together, forming grains of dust that get bigger and bigger. Eventually, they become moon or mars-sized proto-planets. It is actually quite quick to reach this stage, only 100,000 to 300,000 years.

As the collisions continue, the velocities of the remaining objects become more equal. This equality ensures that further collisions are far less destructive, so when they get close to one another, they stick rather than smash together. This accretion process continues, and as their mass increases, their gravity forces them to be roughly spherical.

So when you get a surface, what happens next? How does life grow upon this platform? You think I have all day? Go watch Planet Earth. I’ll say this much, though: if you factor in the sheer size of space, the possible chemical concoctions that can occur in planetary formation, the distance from their parent star, and the fact that there is a nebulous cloud of gas way back in humanity’s family tree, you’ll find that we are not a virus.

While I hesitate to use the word at the risk of a religious connotation, there is no word more apt for describing what our planet and the development of humanity actually is: a miracle.

The Third Kind: Aliens
Sometimes facing up to the truth is just too much. The thing is, when it’s all on the line it’s easiest to block out our least favourite portions of reality in the hopes of creating some parochial hallucination we would like to think is a few steps from utopia.
But to be honest, before I started reading and learning about our universe, it was all too much to think about, and far easier to
scoff at those who tilted their heads towards the skies and chose to question everything.

You think you’ve got the argu- ments for ET on lockdown. I mean, Area 51 right? They have all those UFO sightings and crazy-intricate crop circles. Some German broad lived in the Peruvian desert studying the fuckin’ Nazca lines for over 30 years, thinking aliens had something to do with it; the Mayans had pyramids, the Egyptians had pyramids. Coincidence? Had to be aliens! What about all the
abductees?

There are mountains of details associated with those and other arguments, and many of them have enormous followings. But let’s not get too far ahead of ourselves; these arguments are not the cause for my change of heart — the odds are.

Modern telescopes can see 50 billion galaxies or so, but the uni- verse is way bigger than that so we’ll call it a moderate 100 billion. Each of those galaxies has at least 100 billion stars. So there at the very least are 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars kickin’ about. Even if we say that the chances of one planet or biting one of these stars is one in a million — and in fact, the odds are better than that — we can assume there are 10,000,000,000,000,000 planets in the universe. Call it a one in a million chance that those planets can support life: 10 billion planets with life.

The Drake equation was created with legitimate math and science to estimate the number of intelligent, communicating species in the galaxy, and the best values come in at around 10,000!

I doubt alien life will be in the form of a little green man. Right now my money is on bacteria, which isn’t so impressive. All those arguments about contact — the abductions, crop circles, and Mayan stuff — I just don’t see it as possible. The universe is simply too big.
So while I know that there are intelligent beings on some far off planet, I lament the fact that our planet will probably fizzle out and die before we get to meet them. Maybe we are more advanced than they are. Maybe they are viscous pulsating orbs of goo and humanity ended up being the best tail to be pinned on the cosmic donkey. We don’t know, but there is certainly life beyond Earth.

The Galactic Mystery Spot: Black Holes

Everyone has heard of black holes, whether as part of a sexual innuendo, or more appropriately as a bottomless pit that takes you somewhere else in space. But what are they, really? The fact is that we can only postulate. No one really knows, and it is fundamentally impossible to ascertain the truth. Astrophysicists can now, at least, agree that they’re real, but observable evidence has been harder to come by than the last cupcake at a fat-kid convention.

So, here’s the theoretical deal:

Think of space-time as a sheet being stretched out by you and three friends, a la the parachute game in elementary school, flat and tight like Jane Fonda’s abs in the 80s.

Now, toss a baseball on there and think of it as a planet. It sits in space-time, only slightly distorting the fabric. If you threw a golf ball on the blanket just so, it would roll around the conical indent created by the heavier mass. If you remove friction from the equation, it can basically revolve around the base- ball forever. This is what’s happen- ing with the Earth and its moon.

Throughout this scenario, light — our steady and unwavering pal – passes by with no problem. Paltry planets don’t exert a strong enough gravitational pull to distort its path. But now imagine placing a sewing needle in the sheet with an aircraft carrier tied to it underneath; imagine all that mass and ability to distort the fabric, concentrated on such a tiny point. That’s a black hole and it’s a big enough deal to keep even light from escaping.

There are a few ways black holes come to be, but for brevity’s sake I’ll give a shout out to gravitational collapse alone. As it goes in Hollywood, so it goes in space: all stars eventually burn out and die. They start out young, dimly flickering in the distance, barely noticeable to us. After they do their thing for a while, the explosive nuclear heat they generate keeps them burning. But all good things must come to an end, and like Courtney Cox, eventually there just isn’t enough fuel left to keep the fires burning bright.

The temperature drops and the star collapses under its own weight. When this happens to an enormous star a Courtney Cox- sized mega-giant — the collapse is particularly devastating; it cannot find equilibrium between the force supporting it and the gravity it creates, and it implodes. It falls inward, and all that is left behind is a singularity; the center of a black hole, where the regular laws of physics seem not to apply and Cougar Town is renewed for a second season.

A black hole then is an area in space that is so heavy and dense, that it can eventually pull everything into it. Since even light could not escape their grasp, they were dubbed black holes. They are iden- tified not by their emissions, but by the absence of light.
Don’t worry, though. Earth isn’t destined to be sucked into obliv- ion. We are outside the SZ, the Spaghettification Zone, scientifically known as the Schwarzschild Radius. So we’re good. The edge of that radius is the point of no return, named after an awesome Laurence Fishburne movie: it’s called the event horizon, and it has some cool properties.

There is a lot more to this that still needs explanation. If I’ve done my job right, you’ve been left with more questions than answers.

Time dilation: it’s fucked up

1

peak time dilation

No, it’s not just how much longer an hour feels while you’re in tutorial

By Daryn Wright and Ben Buckley

If you’ve never heard of time dilation before — or you have but have never thought on it long enough to want to hide under a table — prepare to experience a confusing amount of feelings, ranging from awe to terror to existentialism.

Wikipedia defines time dilation, according to the theory of relativity, as an actual difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by ob- servers either moving relative to each other or differently situated from gravitational masses. If this jargon confuses you, don’t worry, you’re not alone. Essentially, what we hold true on Earth for the relative experience of time differs due to differences in velocity and gravity in outerspace. So the farther away you are from the gravitational pull of the giant mass that is Earth, the more time becomes a relative term.

In order to fully understand what exactly is going on here, we must first separate the effects of velocity and gravity on time. Both of these fall under the category of relativity, with special relativity pertaining to the effects of speed/velocity on time and general relativity referring to the effects of gravity on time.

With special relativity, the effect of a hypothetical astronaut’s velocity (a measure of speed in a particular direction) as s/he approaches the speed of light relative to an observer, is that less time passes for the astronaut than for the observer. Technology limits the effects of velocity on astronauts though, so the difference it creates is minuscule; as their velocity approaches the speed of light, the difference would be higher, but as it stands, the astronaut crew has only aged about 0.007 seconds less than those on earth.

Not that you could travel at the speed of light, though. The speed of light in a vacuum is constant, and stays the same no matter who’s measuring it. Whether you’re the twin on Earth or the twin in space traveling near light speed, no matter how fast you’re going, you will always measure the speed of any light in a vacuum as being exactly 299,792,458 metres per second.

For example, if you’re in a train going 40 meters per second, and you run at five meters per second towards the front of the train, an observer standing still by the tracks will measure your speed as 45 meters per second. But if you shine a flashlight towards the front of the moving train and measure the speed of the light, both you and the observer will measure the light as being exactly the same speed.

General relativity works like this: the further away from Earth this hypothetical astronaut travels, the force of gravity decreases, thus increasing the amount of time that has passed. The effect of being far away from a gravitational force, though, is different. It will appear as if the clock is moving faster than if it were close to the source of the gravitational force, aka on Earth. The experience of time feels the same to both parties (those on Earth and those in space), despite the effects of time dilation, but the person in space has experienced less time than the person on earth. This is also exaggerated as more time elapses.

Think of it this way: an astronaut with a non-astronaut twin spending ten years in space would come back to Earth, where 50 years have passed. These twins are traveling at different speeds (one on Earth, one in the rocket) but they measure the speed of light in a vacuum to be the same. This sounds crazy, but it adds up because time is also passing differently for each of them. That’s why the twin in the rocket has aged more than the twin on Earth.

The part that makes me squeamish is the larger implications of all of this. Time travel isn’t some fictitious tale involving morlocks; it’s not just possible, it’s already happening.

If this doesn’t make you marvel at the wonders of the universe, I don’t know what will. It certainly makes everything seem rather slippery and intangible though, and I feel a tiny bit like a shivering doe in headlights, wondering what it is that’s inside that Cadillac hurtling towards me at 100 mph.

BRB, gotta go curl up in a blanket in a dark room now.

Close encounters of the film kind

0

WEB-Matthew cimone-Mark Burnham

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos by Mark Burnham

At an early age, Matthew wanted to become an astronaut, but his eyesight wasn’t good enough. Growing up in northwestern Ontario, Matthew Cimone would spend many starry nights with his grandfather’s telescope, looking up at space. Matthew’s grandfather was the one that in- stilled his early love for space. “One of the things he wanted to convey was just how vast the universe is,” says Matthew of his grandfather.

Another thing that his grandfather had taught him was the value of humanity, and so Mat- thew studied international development instead. Upon gradu- ation, however, he realized that he still had a lingering hunger to explore space.

“At some point, a couple years ago, I started recognizing that maybe where my training was in school and my interest in space were not as dichotomous as I thought they were,” he explains. And so, Matthew and his childhood friend Paul Muzzin, a film school graduate, embarked on their own mission: making the documentary Chasing Atlan- tis. Muzzin has his own production company, through which the friends started on the film project.

In July 2011, after 30 years and 135 missions, the space shuttle Atlantis was launched for the last time, marking the end of the space shuttle era.

This inspired the duo to film an independent documentary, in honour of the transition between “old space,” a more government-led approach, and “new space,” which is charac- terized by a rise in entrepreneurial companies indepen- dently going into space. “It’s basically a film about people’s love for space and science fiction against the backdrop of the retirement of the space shuttle program,” explains Matthew.

Certainly, there’s the obvious risk that astronauts take, but Matthew also talks about this risk in other facets: in art, in chang- ing careers, and in his own expe- rience with the project. “It’s looking at space as a metaphor for risk-taking in life,” he sums up. A political scientist by training, Matthew finds ways to draw certain parallels between the two sciences. The most striking is the link with a conflict diamond (also known as a blood diamond) — that is, a diamond mined in the midst of a war and sold for nefarious purposes, usually to a warlord.

Having worked in Sierra Leone, a country infamous for blood diamonds, Matthew is quick to put things into perspective by using space. In the context of the universe, diamonds aren’t really that rare on other planets. “The diamond of the universe is life, that’s the rarest thing out there,” he adds. “When we forget these perspectives, we’re willing to trade the most precious thing, life, for the far less precious.”

Space is vast, and learning about it is relevant and acces- sible to everybody. “One of the neat things about astronomy is that it’s a field of science that’s accessible to almost everyone,” concludes Matthew. “The three lessons from the universe: it’s way older than us, it’s way bigger than us, and it’s crazy, amazingly beautiful.”

It is projected that the documentary will hit film festivals in the fall.

The Peak chatted with Matthew for podcast #6! Listen here