Home Blog Page 1263

Peak Week June 17 – 22

0

Eats

Looking for Tiki to happiness? Or just an escape from bad puns? Check out The Shameful Tiki Room on Main Street. The joint is dedicated to creating an authentic Tiki experience, with its adherence to dark interiors, and music that doesn’t overpower conversations. The decor has been imported from all over the world, with Tapas cloth coming from Fiji and Tonga, Tiki carvings, puffer fish lamps, and even a piece of artwork from the Waldorf Hotel. Expect share plates and many vintage crafted cocktails, including the Zombie, the Jet Pilot, and of course, the Mai Tai.

Beats

The Vancouver International Jazz Festival begins June 21 and runs until July 1. The festival takes place at several different venues across the city and features many musicians taking part, including the Dylan Cramer Trio, Sounds of Youth, and Wake Owl. One performance that should not be missed is on June 27, an evening of David Murray Infinity Quartet featuring Macy Gray. Check the full schedule at coastaljazz.ca.

Theats

Wednesday, June 19, the Rio Theatre will be hosting an Improv Against Humanity show by The Fictionals Comedy Co. Officially endorsed by the game Cards Against Humanity, this improv show will bring to life some of the most absurd comedic moments on stage. Nothing will be off limits, and you can expect such topics as “Harry Potter Erotica” and “A Windmill Full of Corpses.” If you’re looking for a good mid-week laugh, tickets are $6 in advance or $9 at the door.

Elites

The Powell Street Festival presents The Orientique on June 22. Taking place at the Sun Yat-Sen Classical Chinese Garden, fashion meets art in an evening of performance, introducing the mixing of fashion design and wearable art. The evening will feature designs by Yasuhiro Tomita of Rukus, Terry Sasaki, and Akihiko Izukura. DJ LKS will provide the music, and there will be dance performances by Ralph Escamillan and Katerina Leppard, fusing together Western and Eastern influences and old and new Japan. Tickets are $15 in advance or $20 at the door.

Treats

I don’t care where you get it from, but if you need to get your hands on some Earnest Ice Cream, ASAP. If you’re anything like me, you crave ice cream at least once (or three times) a week, and not just anything is going to cut it. This is where Earnest Ice Cream comes in and saves your life. Ben and Erica, the two geniuses behind the locally made treat, realized that they were passionate about making good food — specifically, ice cream — and I’m glad they did. You can find jars of the stuff all around the city, including Dirty Apron, Le Marche St. George, and various Farmers Markets around the city. Flavours range from Whiskey Hazelnut to Blue Cheese and Fig to Mulled Pear. Grab a pint and hit up the beach.

The Fore-Playlist: 10 songs to get you in the mood

0

The mix-tape: it’s been the choice aphrodisiac of disc jockeys, record store snobs and your parents since the 70s. There’s something about a handpicked selection of soulful singles that still has the power to get your figurative and literal juices flowing. For your listening pleasure, The Peak has assembled 10 of the sexiest songs we know — from soul music to shoegaze — into a mix-tape for only the most sensual of occasions. Just press play.

 

1. “Let’s Get It On” by Marvin Gaye

It’s become the punchline of many sex jokes over the years, but this smouldering single still has the power to turn heads and accelerate heartbeats. Gaye’s soulful croon and magnetic performance make “Let’s Get It On” one of the sexiest songs in soul music history, and the perfect way to kick off an after dinner make-out session.

2. “Work It” by Missy Elliott

Missy Elliott’s appeal ranges from dive bar dance contests to Master’s Degree theses. This song is a great example of her inimitable blend of smart and sexy. Her take-charge attitude and rapid-fire flow, cement her as the intellectual’s sex symbol of choice, and the song’s bodacious backbeat is sure to loosen inhibitions . . . and belts.

3. “Ego Free Sex Free” by Autre Ne Veut

Part Beyonce and part Bowie, Arthur Ashin’s steamy R&B stylings are more than the sum of his influences. From its pulse-pounding verses to its momentous chorus, “Ego Free Sex Free” might be the hottest single released this year. Eat your heart out, Justin Timberlake.

4. “To Here Knows When” by My Bloody Valentine

Any song on My Bloody Valentine’s seminal shoegaze classic Loveless would be at home on this mix, but Bilinda Butcher’s seductive vocals and Shields’ liquified aural landscapes on this mid-album standout put it a cut above the rest. Who knew Ireland could be so sexy?

5. “Electric Feel” by MGMT

Psychedelic poster-boys MGMT may have exhausted their 15 minutes of fame, but the sexy acid-trip of “Electric Feel” still sounds as fresh as the day it was released. The neon-glare libido of that bass line is still the sexiest hipsters get without having to trade in their PBR for sparkling wine.

6. “Thinkin Bout You” by Frank Ocean

Frank Ocean got a lot of attention last year for his coming out story, but what so many of those tabloid headlines failed to highlight was just how good his music is. However you self-identify, Ocean’s airy vocal and passionate lyrics prove that sexy and sentimental aren’t mutually exclusive.

7. “Untitled (How Does It Feel)” by D’Angelo

It’s D’Angelo. Need I say more? This seasoned neo soul superstar can rock a falsetto like no other, and the Prince-inspired “Untitled (How Does It Feel)” might be his sexiest single. Unless your lover is made of stone, they’re unlikely to be immune to D’Angelo’s charms — and neither are you.

8. “Je T’aime . . . Moi Non Plus” by Serge Gainsbourg and Jane Birkin

Given that half of the vocals on this controversial single are made up of drawn-out moans and suggestive sighs, this mix would be incomplete without this famous duet between French singer Serge Gainsbourg and his British beau. Factor in that the song’s lyrics include lines like “I go and I come / Between your loins,” and you’ll wonder how it was even recorded at all.

9. “Kiss” by Prince

Prince’s androgynous sex appeal has become the stuff of legends, and although any of his many songs could be included on this mix, the stripped-down minimalism of 1986’s “Kiss” makes the single’s erotic invitation a hard one to resist. The song’s message of unconditional love just make it all the more appealing.

10. “Glory Box” by Portishead

Though this Bristol group’s gloomy trip-hop stylings might seem an unconventional choice for a romp between the sheets, lead singer Beth Gibbons’ playfully confident vocal and the song’s Isaac Hayes sampled instrumental are equal parts enigmatic and mystifying. For those who like a little mystery in their love lives, “Glory Box” makes fitting background music.

 

Legalizing prostitution is a moral and logical action

0

WEB-Prostitute-Vaikunthe Banerjee

 

By Sajid Akhtar

Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

Prostitution is a subjective moral debate, with no clear consensus whether or not it should be legal. As the world’s oldest profession, legal prohibition of it has failed to eradicate the business, and proves that its legal status should be an obvious affirmative.

While sex at its best is about love and a true connection between two individuals, people do engage in casual sex for the sheer physical pleasure. Moreover, such trysts can be influenced by drugs or alcohol, or be brought about by lying and manipulation, which would seem far less moral than a sober woman making a rational decision about her body. So when we do not always condemn men and women who choose to be promiscuous, why would we condemn prostitution?

Sex in its inherent nature is not illegal, and neither are free markets. I fail to understand the logic behind combining the two and making the result illegal. Many women working as prostitutes freely choose their profession. Should they really be deprived of this choice?

While it is true some women are coerced into prostitution, that does not negate the fact that many women do freely choose it. The coercion itself should be illegal, but we should not take away the choice from those who would like to make it. By legalizing prostitution, a government can help bring these labourers under labour protections that are offered to other workers.

Some claim that prostitution is an inherently unsafe venture, and so it should not be sanctioned by labour laws. However, many other industries are unsafe — such as the mining industry — and this was precisely the reason why government labor laws and unions were created to help protect them. Skills Development Canada states that one in every 68 workers were injured on the job in 2010, with the construction industry being the highest risk industry at 24.5 cases per every 1000 employers.

When an industry is criminalized and the demand for it persists, black markets will emerge. This means no government regulation exists, making the likelihood of abuse, violence, and rape all the more real. By condemning prostitution, we are closing our eyes to the problems that prevail with this profession at its status quo.

People who condemn prostitution often base their opinion on the risk of STDs associated with the profession. There are, however, many dangers related to all kinds of legal professions. A person working in a factory risks dismemberment, chemical burns, and in some cases, even death. In 2008 alone, 24 out of 1000 employees of the manufacturing industry were injured while at work.

A consumer of any product similarly risks injury due to defective parts or shoddy construction. In everything we do, we are choosing a level of risk that we deem acceptable. In the case of prostitution, the risk of a client catching an STD is known, and the client is willing to take that risk. To use that as a basis for victimization would be silly considering you could catch E-coli from a bag of spinach.

Moreover, legalizing prostitution and issuing state-approved health cards to prostitutes could help eradicate this problem altogether, and provide sex workers with freedoms enjoyed by all other workers in Canada.

We need to eliminate the shame attached to HPV

0

By Natasha Wahid

I love sex. I think it’s totally awesome and empowering for consenting, of-age guys and gals to do it as often as they like, with whomever they like as long as they’re being safe.

I’m a pretty traditional broad when it comes to sex, though: I’m 24, and have only slept with two guys, both of whom I was seeing exclusively. I blame my religious upbringing for my slightly prudish ways, and to this day, I am still pretty picky about who I let down there, but I have good reason for doing so.

Guy number two on my list of sexual conquests happened to have human papillomavirus. For those of you who don’t know, human papillomavirus (HPV), according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI). There are more than 40 types of HPV that can infect the genitals, mouths, and throats of both males and females.

The CDC says that nearly all sexually active men and women will get HPV at some point in their lives, even if they’ve only had sex with one person. If you’re anything like me, your reaction to this is something along the lines of “holy shit.”

It’s shocking to me that an STI as pervasive as this one still seems to be flying under the radar. I’m not saying people haven’t heard of HPV or don’t know what it is, in a vague sense, but people don’t talk about it. At all.

HPV, like most other big, bad, scary STIs, comes with its share of physical consequences. But — perhaps even more damaging — it comes with a hell of a lot of stigma.

I got lucky with my HPV encounter, as the guy in question turned out to be a pretty decent human who saw fit to alert me of his status before we slept together. However, we’d been fooling around for six months and I could’ve easily been exposed to the virus. I took the proper steps and got tested and was fortunately all right.

But the whole thing got me thinking about how fucked up the lines of communication are in a situation involving something like HPV. The guy wanted to tell me sooner but didn’t want to be presumptuous or scare me off, and the more I thought about his “excuse,” the more it made sense. It’s a tough, awkward, shitty thing to tell a prospective sexual partner that you have HPV – kind of kills the seductive vibe, you know?

The fact is that HPV is a transmissible virus, but transmission rates, infection rates, and the ability of an immune system to fight off the virus vary from person to person. So, my guy might have told himself that because we weren’t engaging in especially high-risk behaviours, I didn’t need to know. It’s really a question of timing. But, at the end of the day, it’s my body, my cervix, my cancer risk, and I had the right to know before the relationship ever got physical.

The terrible thing here is the fear, so here’s what I really think: let’s all just say “no” to the fear. Statistically, almost every sexually active adult has encountered HPV, so we should be adopting a“we’re-all-in-this-together” mentality.

Let’s just say “fuck you” to the self-imposed shame, and be honest with our sex partners. And if someone you want to get jiggy with is good enough to inform you of their STI status, reward their bravery and honesty with some protected sex or at the very least, a whole lot of respect. Knowledge is power, people.

Cherry-picking does not equal confirmation

0

By Ben-Buckley

If you want to know the truth about something, you should look at the raw facts and figures with as little bias as possible, and allow your conclusion to emerge naturally from the data. This may seem obvious, but it’s easier said than done; there are many ways in which our culture encourages us to form an opinion first, and then justify it later.

For example, many of us were taught in high school to write essays by first choosing a thesis statement, then researching the topic for facts to defend that thesis, and finally putting it all together in a final draft. This always bothered me as a student. After all, what if, upon researching the topic, you find your initial conceptions were completely wrong? This method of essay writing teaches students to decide what their opinion is, and then cherry-pick the literature for data that supports their thesis.

Computer programmer and essayist Paul Graham writes about the origin of this method of teaching in his article “The Age of the Essay.” Modern English composition classes have their roots in medieval universities, where lawyers were trained in the methods of defending a predefined position. To quote Graham, “defending a position may be a necessary evil in a legal dispute, but it’s not the best way to get at the truth, as I think lawyers would be the first to admit.”

The “thesis first, facts later” approach to essays appeals to what psychologists call the “confirmation bias.” Once a person has decided what they believe, they will tend to notice evidence that supports their position and ignore evidence that contradicts it. As Neil Gaiman explains it, “decide the universe is, say, run by secret enormous teddy bears, and I can guarantee you’ll immediately start running across evidence that this is true.”

It’s little wonder, then, that many people think of debates as battles in which the primary purpose is to win against your opponent. Facts and arguments are nothing but useful artillery, and differing positions are just sides in a fight.

This is how debates are often presented in TV and radio talk shows. Everyone picks a position the same way in which they’d pick a sports team, and then grasps at whatever arguments they can to support their side. But reality is not made up of teams, and the act of developing arguments in favour of a position does nothing to make that position true.

How do we fight the confirmation bias? One idea is to take a clue from how scientists test a hypothesis by experimentation. A well designed experiment is setup to try to disprove the hypothesis. That way, if the experiment confirms the hypothesis, it’s unlikely to have happened by accident.

So, if you want to have a more accurate view of the world, you should recognize when you believe something that might cause you to be biased, and instead of trying to prove yourself right, test your beliefs by looking for ways you can be proven wrong

Open relationships get a bad rap

0

By Gloria Mellesmoen

Relationships, in any construct, are social contracts with certain terms and conditions implied in their creation. The traditional “monogamous”relationship has been one that has persisted throughout the ages with certain adaptations to reflect the times.

Though pre-marital couples may not officially sign a contract, there is an implicit understanding that surrounds their existence. I like to think of this kind of relationship as adopting a template that has proven to work, for the most part, in the past.

Those who enter open relationships have examined this template and want to modify the terms and conditions to reflect what they want in a partnership. They have sat down at a bargaining table and negotiated on what their ideal relationship looks like, and determine together how each individual can best benefit from an agreement to date.

In this light, it seems strange that one would condemn the idea of an open relationship as less committed without any notion of what the involved parties have agreed to. Each couple has their own structure and accompanying guidelines that they maintain throughout the course of the relationship.

Though the contract might not reflect the societal norm, it does not mean there will be more leniency or less punishment for not complying with the terms of agreement.

Open relationships often get a negative reputation for being purely about sex, but I wholeheartedly disagree. While most couples of this nature are, to varying degrees, accepting of sexual interaction outside of the pairing, it is not the crux of their existence or the thing that breaks them. Monogamous relationships tend to put their focus on their physical aspects.

Cheating can be a concern for anyone, but those in monogamous relationships are the ones who tend to rank sleeping with another person to be the worst offense. In contrast, open relationships are often structured around the idea that emotional attachment is more important than the physical.

The priority in an open relationship is not about managing what your partner does, or does not do with their body. The traditional relationship used to assume male dominance and implied ownership over a woman, which is something our Western culture has shunned.

I think open relationships are a novel way of reflecting on the progression society has made by encouraging dialogue between individuals before entering a relationship that maximizes mutual gain.

Open relationships, just like monogamous relationships, are as unique as the people in them. Some couples prefer disclosure about sexual acts before or after, while others do not. There may be restrictions on who gets labeled as fair game; these can include or exclude mutual acquaintances. Cheating may be defined in a variety of ways. While there are many variations, there are several common elements that often accompany this breed of relationship.

An open relationship is a symbiotic one which thrives on the happiness and safety, both emotional and physical, of the parties involved. Though you may have the freedom to act on primal urges, it is done with consideration of your partner and therefore, makes sexual safety a necessity. When it comes down to it, your partner comes first. The relationship ends when you no longer give them priority.

Open relationships are just as serious as traditional ones. The terms and conditions may vary, but they are still part of a social contract. Whether one values sexual or emotional exclusivity, every relationship is a committed one.

Safe sex isn’t always an accessible option

0

WEB-Stealing Condoms-Vaikunthe Banerjee

By Tara Nykyforiak
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

The most primal and pleasure-fueled of all human acts can also be a financial burden for those involved. It’s great that so many young people today are taking proper measures to practice safe sex, so it’s unfortunate and illogical that condoms are priced the way they are. You may never have given it much thought, but the high cost of condoms does have a real impact on drug stores and the choices that couples make.

A box of my favourite condoms will run me and my partner $16.99 plus tax. This is exponentially cheaper than the cost of raising a child, but works out to be the better part of a dollar per bedroom session nonetheless. When compared to the BC minimum wage — $10.25 an hour — a box of condoms seems like a lot, because a person has to work one and half hours just to make enough to afford to have this safe sex option.

Now, it is easy as a student to get condoms for free through the health centre, but this isn’t always practical. Students such as myself in long-term relationships are in need of more than a couple condoms here and there, so this option is only realistic for those partaking in casual hookups.

Of course, there are other options. Birth control pills can be cheaper, because many Canadian university student health plans offer them at reduced costs. However, the pill is hormone based, so when a woman uses birth control pills, her natural hormone cycles are altered.

Moreover, the pill does not protect against STIs, and there is a long list of potential side effects. Yaz (a specific brand of the pill) was determined in 2011 by the Food and Drug Administration to cause a 75 percent increase risk for blood clotting. More recently, it was linked to the death of 23 Canadian women, so it’s easy to understand why birth control pills are a contraceptive measure not all women need or desire.

One can also suggest various other methods of birth control, such as a copper intrauterine device (IUD). It is good for five years, is non-hormonal, and costs between $90 to $160. This amounts to significant savings long-term; however, it does not protect against STIs, and not all women feel comfortable with having foreign objects implanted in their bodies.

So, if alternative forms of birth control are not what a woman needs or is comfortable with, the only means left for her to practice safe sex — in this case using condoms — will cost upwards of $228 a year, if her and her partner go through a box of Trojans or Durex every month. At this price, sometimes I feel like I’m being punished for being a student in a committed relationship who practices safe sex.

A study conducted by Pharmacy Practice revealed the consequences of having a high price on condoms. Of the drug stores featured in the study, up to 11.74 per cent of condoms were stolen in a given month, with the store experiencing the highest theft rates located in a university town. That’s a lot of inventory being stolen, but more importantly, is the message being conveyed: condoms are not priced as an affordable option for safe sex, especially for those in lower income brackets.

At the end of the day, the most natural, non-invasive, and most effective means of practicing safe sex are condoms, so it’s a real shame they aren’t more accessible.

Cats will forever fuck up your game

0

By Will Ross

Cats are probably the worst thing that can happen to your sex life. When you first step into a strange apartment on your second, third, or eighth date, these little tyrants are often all that stands between you and a sleepless, sweaty night.

Sure, claiming to love them seems like an easy way “in,” but you’re only fooling your date, and before you know it your eyes lock with the cat. You, terrified of this threat to your self-esteem’s last hope of redemption; the cat, terrified that it will not be able to get exclusive snuggles at its whim.

You sit on the couch. You find a movie that neither of you would really mind bailing out on. You’ve slowly worked your staccato body shakes into tremors, and you’re just starting to wrap your arm around your companion when, all of a sudden, the cat jumps up and spins around and shoves its face into everything, a full-on panic mode that works every time.

A vision may then appear in your head: the cat, gracefully spinning through the air in slow motion, before bursting through a pane of glass and falling to its death. Take my advice, do it — throw it out the window. This is not in the humour section; I am telling you to kill that cat. It’s now or never!

Well, I guess tossing it off the couch works too. Hey, it looks like someone appreciates assertiveness, because here comes Hot Lips! At this point, make a mental note to watch more John Wayne movies. You stand up with her, and start walking her to her bedroom. Oops, that’s the bathroom. You let her lead this time.

Soon enough, you’re taking off each other’s clothes. You’re not even sure whose hands are doing what; if one of you disappeared, it would look like the other was playing charades. Then something furry slips against your legs. Oh no. No, no.

It turns out the patio door was open, and that fucker just decided to hop on through. Before you can say “inside cat” your quarry is knocking on the doors of neighbours in adjacent apartments while you sit in the living room to see if your nemesis comes back.

And then, it does. The cat is right there at the window, staring at you. As you look into each other’s eyes, you see something you recognize — an insatiable need for affirmation, to be affirmed, always. The both of you are clingers, manipulators, forever begging for love.

I should have John Wayned the little bastard through that window back when I had the chance.

Let’s talk about sex, baby

0

June 17 2013 copy

 

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos by Ben-Buckley

I was recently out shopping when Bruno Mars’ “Locked Out of Heaven” came on the radio. Now, one of the lines of this song is, “your sex takes me to paradise,” except in the “radio-friendly” version, it was, “your ____ takes me to paradise.” The word “sex” was omitted as if it were offensive profanity.

Our society is notoriously over-sexualized and, while we do have sexual education and resources in schools, clearly we are not as collectively comfortable with the topic as we may think up here in our ivory towers of post-secondary.

In 2011, for example, Fifty Shades of Grey jumped to the top of bestsellers’ lists. The series has a weak plot, a shaky premise, little to no character development, and writing quality that makes The Berenstain Bears look like a Dostoyevsky novel. Why did its success soar to such ridiculous heights? Because the topics of sexuality and alternative forms of sex were suddenly open for discussion. It is only in the past few years these topics have been more or less accepted outside of Dan Savage’s fan base.

Sex education is theoretically taught in Canadian public schools throughout elementary and secondary schools. But that doesn’t mean this always plays out in practice; I, for example, didn’t get my sexual education in school until mid to late high school.

In grade five, my teacher misplaced the Why Is This Happening To Me? booklets and, through a twist of events, we had a substitute teacher and were never taught what was happening to our bodies. Luckily for me, my parents had always been meticulous in answering my questions from a young age, so I wasn’t left embarrassed and confused by my changing body. But what if — when my four year old self had asked about babies — my mother had told me about storks instead of drawing out the sperm and egg?

In 2010, then Ontario Premier, Dalton McGuinty, launched a new sex education program. Students in Grade 1 were to be taught the correct terminology for genitalia (in part as sexual abuse prevention), and in Grade three, they were to be taught about homosexuality. In Grade six, they would learn about masturbation and in Grade seven, the topics of oral and anal sex would be explored. Students would also be taught from a young age that gender is not dichotomous.

It was withdrawn almost immediately after Stop Corrupting Children (on the Canadian Values website) and other conservative and religious groups started an uproar, including a petition. Now Kathleen Wynne, who was elected as Ontario’s premier in January, is trying to bring it back. On the other hand, a 2001 National Post / Global Poll found that more than 85 per cent of parents agreed that sexual health education should be provided in schools. We’re on the right track.

Sex is present in one form or another in all animals, and it is also a factor in healthy relationships. So why is the topic still broached? It is taught in schools and there are a plethora of resources out there, but it is harder to undo the idea of a bird bringing a baby than it is to teach the truth right off the bat.

Deeming this natural act as “inappropriate” for children is short-sighted and insults children’s ability to comprehend and accept information. In fact, the taboo that is often attached to the topic of sex is a social constraint, not a natural reaction to it; instead of starting a child’s sex education in grades four or five, it should simply be a topic open for discussion.

Everything under the rainbow with Kate Reid

0

KR-1559
By Rachel Braeuer
Illustration by Amelia Reid
Photos courtesy of Kate Reid

Local folk singer Kate Reid’s new album, Queer Across Canada, dropped two weeks ago. It’s a major departure from her usual work in that it’s an album specifically for kids. The Peak sat down with her and talked about the new album, homophobia, sex, and more.

What motivated you to write an album like Queer Across Canada for kids and LGBT families?

Part of why I wanted to do this, what was really the cementing piece, was having a conversation with [my partner] Maike’s kids. She has a boy named Ben who’s 13 now, but was a lot younger at the time, and Jessica, who is now 10. [Both] would talk about some of the stuff they faced with their peers when they said they have two moms, and other kids say “How, how is that possible? What do you mean you had two moms? How come you don’t have a daddy? How do two moms have kids?”

Ben’s answer to one of the kids was “I do have a dad, I have a donor dad.”  The kids don’t understand what that means and so he had to explain. Then they start teasing him, calling names such as “donut dad,” which in grade three is pretty traumatic, to have someone call your dad a donut dad. [Another experience came from] Jessica, talking about having to make two cards for Mother’s Day and not doing that for Father’s Day, sort of deciding, “Well, who do I make a Father’s Day card for?”

Those kinds of conversations [got me] thinking, “You know, they don’t have any songs that talk about their lives, that speak to their families that they can see themselves reflected in.” All the songs for young people and kids are like, “mommy / daddy,” so I wanted to write songs for them. I wanted to give voice to their stories, and so that’s what started me on it.

So then I started thinking, “I want to interview kids growing up in queer families,” because queer kids are subjected to homophobia, but so are kids of queer families even though they might not identify as queer. That’s another strain of homophobia kids can be subjected to, so that was the impetus for the album.

 

In an interview with Steven Quinn from “On the Coast,” you talked about your background in education and how that factored into making the kit that comes with Queer Across Canada. What is your background in education?  

In terms of my own teaching background, I got a teaching degree in 2000. I had an arts undergrad and then I got a teaching degree. I taught for about seven years full time before I became “the musician” (she laughs).

I did three years of teaching in the interior. The first year of teaching I was in the closet. I was in Midway, for fuck’s sake. Its a small freaking town, like 600 people. I’m not going to come out in this town, I was freaked out.

It was really interesting for me to date a woman who lived in another town; I would go to visit her on weekends and nobody knew about my life. I was not really integrated in the social fabric of Midway, and because I was in the closet and I didn’t really make good friends with the teachers.

In the second year, when my girlfriend and I broke up, I started dating a male gym teacher at the high school, my social life just opened up. Suddenly I didn’t have to be afraid, I didn’t have to be in the closet, and I started to talk about, you know, I did have a girlfriend, because now it was okay. Now I had the safety of being in a heterosexual relationship, so it was such an eye opener from me to go from one extreme from the other.

So then I taught for another year, afterwards took another year off and then I moved here, and I worked on the sub-list in Vancouver for about four years before quitting to try to do music full time.

 

A lot of your earlier work was more personal narrative or introspective. Was it hard for you to write from such a different perspective and doing a lot more interview work? 

No, it wasn’t, actually. It was a lot of fun because when I was doing the interviews, it was really fascinating to hear people stories. I love the interview process — it was really cool. When I was doing it I was always looking for that little gem, that little phrase that I could turn into a song or that could be the title of a song.

For instance, “Tummy Mummy,” that was a phrase that this one particular family had used to describe the birth mother of their daughter, and that’s what I built that song around. How can you not write a song around that? It’s so cute!

Another song, “Cool Enough to Be Gay” was written because there were two mid-teen boys, and one of them was explaining how, when his parents called for a family meeting, he was worried about it and he was going to his mom’s house and was wondering, “What is this going to be about? Did someone die? Is someone getting divorced or are they getting back together? Is mom pregnant?”

On the way home, he’s trying to figure out all the possible reasons they’re going to have this big meeting for, and his thought was like, “maybe dad’s gay . . .” but sort of thought to himself “no, he’s not cool enough to be gay.” I just thought that that was the gem of the interview. That’s hilarious. It was fun. People say interesting stuff. The anecdotes . . . it was really cool to turn that into song. It was actually sort of fun, you know, I wasn’t writing about myself for once so it was a nice break.

 

Doing It For The Chicks’ “Ain’t No Drama Queen” talks about your experience with internalized homophobia. Did that come up for you while working on Queer Across Canada?

Yeah, it comes up for me a lot. In particular I remember writing that song because whenever I go into a studio, everytime I’ve gone in — I don’t know if I remember it in the first album because I was working with a woman, she was a lesbian, so I don’t know if that was why — but I’ve worked with two different [guys named] Adam and they were both straight, but I’d have this feeling of, “Oh, my songs are so gay. Why am I writing all of this gay stuff? All of this queer material?”

I would just have this negative thought process start happening, you know, enough with the gay stuff already, and I’m playing my songs for the first time and I’m thinking in my head: “What are they going to think about this song?” I’m worried that it’s too queer, or just not legit because it’s queer.

So, “Ain’t No Drama Queen” came up because I was having that feeling really strongly that particular week when I was in a recording studio in Toronto, and I was feeling really down on myself about it, about writing about this stuff, wondering what I was doing this for again, how many times can you sing this stuff about being queer? It turns out there’s a lot of stuff you can sing about being queer. It’s the lens that I look through, or that I write though. I find that it comes up in different ways and sometimes in really big ways and sometimes in small ways.

As I move through my life, the more I sing about it, the more I write about it, the less that stuff comes up. But I do have internalized homophobia. I mean, I do around my family. Sometimes I go home and I think, “Oh, I’m too much, I’m too out there, I’m too queer, I’m too activist, too . . . much! Too much queer already, stop it!” But when I’m with my friends, that’s what we talk about. We talk about our issues, we talk about what it’s like to be queer in the world so it feels okay.

 

 

It was kind of funny, I [was] kind of [feeling] bad because it’s the sex issue, but I really wanted to do this because I wanted queer content, but then I think, “Is it too gay? Are people going to think it’s not well related?” Everything you’re saying . . . I totally get that, but then I have to be like “fuck that.”

No, totally fuck that. Nobody ever says “oh that’s too straight.” Nobody ever says, “oh, the stuff on the radio is too heterosexual.” Well, queers are saying that, but heterosexual people don’t. And nobody ever questions if “there’s too many love songs on the radio about men and women hooking up.”

I’ve written a similar song based on a similar topic, called “Uncharted Territory,” because some of my friends on my first album said “you sing too much about being lesbian, enough already,” and I had a reviewer say that too about my music. She said something like, “there were two songs on the album that were complete duds, it was starving artist and I’d go straight for Ridley Bent”, and then she said, “Yeah, we know you’re a dyke, we get it, enough already.”

That was in the review, and I’m just like, “Fuck you!” and then I had some friends say “Well why do you sing so much about it?” Somebody has to. We have to do this and it’s important to me and it’s part of who I am, it’s my identity. Nobody ever says that to straight singers. “Why do you sing about your boyfriend all the time?” You know what I mean?

[When people ask] “Why do you have to sing queer songs? Can’t you just sing something that’s more mainstream?” [that] just means more straight or not identifying my queerness, and I get what [they’re] saying. But that’s not what I’m here to do. If I wanted to write a song like that, I would’ve fucking written it four albums ago. Enough already, people. Don’t you get it? This is what I’m doing.

There’s lots of queer artists that are making it big and some of their material is questionably queer. Do you think the music industry is actually getting more accepting, or is it just getting more marketable?

I think the first part happens first and then the second part happens. I think the music industry is finally figuring out there’s a whole ‘nother audience out there that they can service and make money from, and I think queer, obviously, is becoming more accepted and filter into the mainstream. I don’t watch TV, but I hear about shows like Modern Family, and Glee.

I mean we had Will and Grace in the 90s but I think in some ways queer is becoming a little bit trendy, maybe? And they’re figuring out how to market that because we’re different than we were 20 years ago. Not different, but out there. I guess it’s becoming more part of the mainstream, and more marketable because there’s an audience for it. Young people are out more than they were. Queer families are more visible, and I think the music business has kind of seen that’s something they can work with.

 

Do you get less of the “why so much gay content?” reviews now as opposed to when you first started?

I only got a few of those kind of reviews, “oh, she just happens to be a lesbian.” Most people who review my music get it. They get that it’s actually not just about being queer, they get that that’s a lens that I write through, but that I actually am a human being and I write from a human being’s perspective. I just happen to be whatever I happen to be writing from a queer place. Most reviewers are intelligent enough to understand that. There’s that one guy and that one woman who didn’t really see that.

 

KR-1577

 

How does humour factor into your work?

That’s where the universal human being-ness comes into my work. Yeah, I identify as being queer, as a lesbian, but I can also laugh at myself and the way I am in the world and the way the world is, and make fun of these things, and for me that was the bridge into roping in a more mainstream audience. If we have the ability to laugh at ourselves, I think that’s appealing to people no matter how we identify. For me humour was a good tool for that, I saw that as a way to bridge that between the queer community and the non-queer community.

 

What’s it like for you on stage when you get you first bout of laughter from the audience? Is there a difference in the way it feels?

Yeah, it makes me realize “oh, this is going to be a good show, they get it, they understand it, they’re with me,” and the times when they don’t, I just think “I have to work harder here.”

 

Again, off of Doing It For The Chicks, the title track was written in response to a guy’s concerns over your “lifestyle” because he was hosting a concert in his house. It seems like the unspoken concern is always that two people of the same sex are having sex. How much do you think fear over the unknown factors into responses like that when it comes to homophobia?

What I wanted to do with this album was play around people’s fears around the sex piece. It is the part that, as soon as you say you’re lesbian or gay, they automatically think about you with a same sex partner, and people think about you being in bed with that person. I think it’s just an automatic thing that happens in the brain. Whereas you talk to a woman who says my husband, people just don’t go there. We’re so used to it, but I think because of people’s fears around queernes, that’s where they automatically jump to.

It becomes the focus of people’s homophobia because they can’t imagine that that’s OK or normal, or loving, or that it’s actually OK to love somebody of the same sex. They forget that, aside from our sexual relationships and our intimate relationships, we go to work, we have kids, we have problems, we have money issues, we have communication problems, we love to go hiking — we do all these things that everybody else does, except we have same sex partners.

That’s the part of queerness that people are uncomfortable with, the sexual piece, because it’s different than what they do, or maybe it’s something they want to do but they’re too afraid to try, it taps into their own homophobia, it taps into their fantasy that they don’t want to admit to — all of those things.

 

What was it like working with C.R. Avery?

It was great, I think C.R. Avery is a brilliant artist. He’s a lot of fun in the studio, I love his beatboxing, I love his wordplay. A couple of times when we were just hanging out at his house, we were talking about doing a piece about bullying and the queer youth suicide stuff, and he said, “I really want to get into that issue and really do something powerful around that.” And I said that would be great, so in the studio, Adam [the bass player on Queer Across Canada] came up with this bass line, and gave it to C.R. who wrote this piece about it.

He wrote the piece for Mother’s Day / Father’s Day conundrum, which I totally love, but then he wrote this other totally separate thing about this bullying and queer youth suicide, he flipped it and made it — I think he called the song “The Drag Queen Vigilante” — about how drag queens go around killing bullies. They basically retaliate, and kill the bullies and throw them in the back of the hearse, and all of this stuff. It’s a great piece, I mean it’s amazing, but I thought,“it’s not good for a kid’s album.” I wanted to, and I thought about it, but it . . .  it doesn’t work for this album. Maybe a different album, but yeah, he does some amazing stuff.

 

Did you approach him, or did someone suggest him for doing this?

No, I approached him. Yeah, I wanted to have him on the album. I’d been thinking about it for quite a while, and I wanted him to do a spoken word piece and some beatboxing, so yeah it was cool, and he was keen — it was great. I kept running into him in various places, like the airport, and conferences, and I was like, “I want to have you on my next album!” and so it finally came together.

 

The song “Ex-Junkie Boyfriend” reflects on a much younger you and the guy you were living with. Obviously you’ve changed a lot since then. If you could give the you in that song three pieces of advice, what would they be?

I don’t think I would give myself any advice, because I did exactly what I needed to be doing at the time. I don’t regret being with him. I learned a lot in that relationship about myself. He was, y’know, besides the drugs and some of the stuff, we did have some fun. He taught me a lot about living on the coast, about Vancouver, about some books that I thought were interesting and I didn’t know anything about.

I [believe] that we have to go through what we have to go through, and to go back and change something, if I could, I don’t know if I would because I needed to go through that stuff with him in order to understand what I wanted and didn’t want in my life. I always think that relationships are for learning about ourselves and about how to become better people in the world, and I was really young at the time. I was in my early 20’s. I was having fun! I wanted to do the drugs, too, sure! But it got to a point where it was like, “this is not what I want to be doing anymore.”

I learned a lot about myself, and I learned a lot about how I look to other people for my own sense of self, and that was when I was starting to realize that I was doing that in relationships with men. That it was me trying to cultivate a sense of self and some self-confidence through them not on my own, so yeah. My advice? I don’t have any for myself back then. It brought me to where I am today, it gave me a great song, and I don’t regret it.

KReidQACcoverFINALforpromo