Home Blog Page 1255

A suspension of all logic

0

The 2013-14 National Hockey League season has not even begun, yet the NHL’s inconsistent discipline is already in mid-season form. Brendan Shanahan, the NHL’s Director of Player Safety, has a tendency of handing out erratic suspensions and this has never been more evident than during the 2013 preseason.

Two stick-swinging incidents from the past week are at the forefront of this discussion, specifically Vancouver’s Zach Kassian breaking Edmonton’s Sam Gagner’s jaw by wildly swinging his stick after a missed hit, and Toronto’s Phil Kessel’s violent, deliberate slashing at Buffalo’s John Scott. The difference between each incident however, is the intent to injure.

Even though both players were suspended, the severity of each shows the NHL’s inability to levee down appropriate discipline. Kassian was suspended the rest of the preseason, plus an additional five regular season games, while Kessel was only suspended for the remainder of the preseason.

Kassian’s play was dangerous, reckless and even moronic, but he did not mean to hurt Gagner; he just lost control of his stick. Kassian’s teammate Dale Weise was also suspended for the rest of the preseason for an elbow to Taylor Hall’s head, which occurred in the same game.  Weise’s hit, a deliberate one to Hall’s head, is the type of play the NHL vehemently decries and wants out of the game, and yet they gave Weise a lesser penalty compared to Kassian’s freak accident.

The intent to injure in Kessel’s two-handed slashes at John Scott’s leg is quite apparent.  One slash in self-defense is understandable, because Scott — a 6’8”, 270-pound behemoth — was unnecessarily trying to come after the much smaller Kessel. But the second attempt was obviously to harm Scott: at this point, Scott was already subdued by Kessel’s teammates before he wound up for the second strike. An attempt to injure another player should result in a heftier suspension than an accident.

In the video where Shanahan explains Kassian’s suspension, and describes the hit: “Kassian comes to a spinning stop, recklessly swinging his stick and striking Gagner in the face and breaking his jaw.”  Shanahan cites Gagner’s injury, which was revealed after the game, and the injury had no consequence on the play itself, which should make it irrelevant, contrary to what Shanahan seems to be suggesting in the video.  Kassian’s suspension was based on the injury and not the action.

In the Kessel suspension video however, Shanahan notes that Kessel engaged in similar stick swinging incidents previously in the same game, yet Shanahan says Kessel has “no history” of supplemental discipline. While the no supplemental discipline fact is true, Shanahan has showed that Kessel has a very recent history of attempts to injure, although no suspensions.  Shanahan also states that Scott was not hurt, thus the lighter penalty.

These two ideas seem backwards to me. An attempt to injure with no injury merits a lesser suspension, while an accident with an injury deserves more?  The attempts to harm other players are the dirty plays the NHL is trying to get rid of, yet Kessel walks away from trying to harm Scott and others without missing a single regular season game. Meanwhile, Kassian misses meaningful games for an errant stick. It should be the other way around. The NHL’s inconsistent discipline simply comes down to incompetence and hypocritical ideals.

New Miss America signals a triumph for acceptance of attractive diversity

0

missamerica2

ATLANTIC CITY — The recent crowning of a new Miss America pageant winner made history as, for once, the honour was not given to a white, thin, able-bodied, stereotypically gorgeous woman but to someone who is all those things except white.

Nina Davuluri, a 23-year old Indian-American woman, took home the crown and according to many observers demonstrated the amazing increase in tolerance of Americans towards minorities who look good in bikinis.

After years of feeling discriminated against and underrepresented in activities that only rely on looks and don’t require any intelligence or the ability to memorize the spelling of words, many Indian-americans say nowthanks to Davuluri’s win they now feel truly accepted in their nation.

“It’s a huge moment for us” explained Harry Chima, a young, perfectly chiseled Indian-American man, “My whole life I’ve felt like people only looked at me as an equal, but now it finally looks like people are going to take me seriously as being a superior specimen.”

Davuluri’s historic accomplishment has apparently inspired people beyond her own community, with even the most neglected minorities now believing that they can do anything they set their mind to as long as its attached to an attractive body.

Coming out of the darkness

0

BOSE

September brings with it a host of novel adventures, each more interesting than the last. And so it goes with the recent onslaught of Swarm openings, the two-day festival of artist-run exhibitions, though one of these stood out from the rest.

Found on Granville Island, Malaspina Printmakers Society is usually the place to go for the finest in contemporary printmaking. But during the month of September, avant-garde silkscreens and woodcuts gave way to a flurry of responsive works by First Nations artists.

NET-ETH: Going out of the Darkness, co-curated by Rose M. Spahan and Tarah Hogue, coincided with the National Conference hosted by the Truth and Reconciliation Council of Canada, which ran from Sept. 18 to 21.

In some cases, the work that was presented brought to light the government’s assimilation policies inherent in the boarding school system that was put into place in the 1870s, with the help from then-existing missionary schools.

Chris Bose is a multi-disciplinary artist — and member of the Nlaka’pamux / Secwepemc Nation — who presented three digital images that combined historic photographs with symbolic references to the abuses that took place within this mandatory institutional framework.

 Two mounties are shown with religious iconography, raging flames, skulls and the ever present Canadian dollar.

In one of these, The Only Good Indian… (2012), two mounties are shown with religious iconography, raging flames, skulls and the ever present Canadian dollar. This work attested to the complexity of the issues being addressed, while stating outright the resentment that is still felt amongst many modern-day First Nations communities.

Other artists took a more personal approach to the healing process. The series of works by Jada-Gabrielle Pape, for example, displayed a palpable sensitivity toward the community leaders that emerged from the Residential School system.

Here, the mixed media works on handmade paper combined similar imagery to that found in Bose’s work: old school photographs and Coast Salish symbolism, though the treatment and intent was quite different. Pape’s expressive pieces exuded a sense of vulnerability, paying tribute to the resilience of family and the Saanish and Snuneymuxw Nations.

The variety of approaches taken by the more than 20 contemporary and traditional First Nations artists were presented at three venues, including the concourse gallery of Emily Carr University of Art and Design, and the Urban Aboriginal Fair Trade Gallery at Skwachàys Healing Lodge, located in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside.

NET-ETH, which ran through Sept. 29, brought together a congregation of art-lovers and visiting students, and was an integral part of a process of healing taking place this bustling fall season.

Council Chambers

0

WEB - Council Chambers - Brian Wallace

A SPICE-y proposal

A new scholarship program was announced, to be granted by the GSS and the Office of Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Fellows. Student Proposals for Intellectual Community & Engaged Scholarship (SPICES) is to be awarded to graduate student-led projects.

The SPICES program is meant to encourage grad students to collaborate through interdisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and multidisciplinary work. Funding for each project will be up to $5,000; proposals for the first scholarships are due on Nov. 1 of this year. Currently, there are $10,000 secured for the grant program for this semester.

 

Emergency Grocery fund increase

Eleonora Joensuu, GSS Member and Community Relations Officer, announced that SFU Student Services has agreed to match the budget for the GSS’s Emergency Grocery Card program to the tune of $2,000 for the next fiscal year. There has been a significant increase in use of the program, which council is anticipating will continue to grow with the closure of the SFU Food Bank in Dec. 2013.

 

Missions, Visions, Values, and Priorities passed 

A motion passed to approved a draft written by the executive committee of the mission, vision, core values, and key priorities of the GSS. The statement will be revised and officially approved at the AGM in February, but for now it reads: “To be an exemplary student organization led by a passionate community dedicated to the well-being and success of its members.”

The document includes a list of core values and key priorities, some of which are still being reviewed by executive.

 

Benefit Plan Bursary Fund 

Council also passed a motion to use $3,490.95 from the unrestricted net assets to provide benefit plan bursaries. The society gives out bursaries each year to students in financial need, funded from the interest gathered from an RBC Monthly Income Bond Fund. This year, the bond lost approximately $1,344 of the principal $274,272, leaving no interest for the bursaries. The funding from the contingency fund will provide 10-12 bursaries to students.

A motion was also proposed to move the funds in the RBC bond to a risk-free 13-month GIC from Canadian Western Bank, but the motion was tabled until next month’s meeting.

Board Shorts

0

WEB-Board Shorts-lululemon athletica

Exemption needed to fund Build SFU

Board voted to send a letter to the Ministry of Advanced Education requesting special consideration for the funding of the $65 million Build SFU project. The project needs to be financed in order to be completed on time, and the SFSS currently doesn’t have the capital to secure funding. In order to receive a lower interest loan, the university has agreed to back Build SFU by providing an income guarantee, but are unable to hold that much debt on their books as a government reporting entity.

The letter, which has been vetted by university administration and is to be sent out on Monday, requests that the Ministry considers supporting SFU’s request to income guarantee the Build SFU loan. The object of the effort is to ensure that the student-financed project, which will climb to a cap of $90 levees per semester, incurs as little interest as possible.

Financial Aid and Awards to grant SUB bursary

Board passed a motion to facilitate the Build SFU bursaries, which is the option for students with high financial need to receive their levee fees towards the project back, through SFU Financial Aid and Awards. The office processes applications and gives out awards for scholarships and bursaries through the SFU Student Information System.

By going through the Financial Aid and Awards system currently in place, Build SFU will be able to put the refund money for students who are in financial distress into an account with Student Services to dispense, of which the remainder can then be rolled over from year to year. The Build SFU levy will go into effect Jan. 2014, and will start at $10 per semester. The cap for the Build SFU bursary is set at three per cent of the project’s budget, which works out to $2 million over the lifetime of the project, though board indicated that percentage will be discussed in the future.

 

SFU receives $3.5 million in funding for social sciences and humanities

0

WEB-Social science funding-Kinetic Digit

As far as Vice President Research Mario Pinto is concerned, “Social sciences and humanities rock at SFU.” The university recently received a total of $3.5 million in federal grants for both research areas.

In the two years since the launch of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s (SSHRC’s) Insight and Partnership grants, SFU has consistently ranked above the national average in almost every category in terms of application success. This year, 34 per cent of SFU applications were successful, compared with 21 per cent across Canada.

Pinto attributed this to the skills of several grant facilitators on board, positions which were created eight years ago as part of a strategic plan to increase SFU’s research prestige.

The $3.5 million will be distributed to 28 research projects who applied under the Insight and Insight Development categories. Grants are given to a project over the span of between three and five years. The research to be undertaken spans the gamut of the soft science disciplines, from language and learning in children, to persuasion in online environments, to the creation of an archive focused on lesbian knowledge.

 

Hoskyn received just under $500,000 for her research on the developmental differences in cognitive functions in bilingual children.

 

Kirsten McAllister, who will be receiving about $85,000 over a period of three years, said that her funding included the salaries of the three graduate students on her team. McAllister is researching the intersection of human rights violations between Asian countries, such as during times of war, in order to broaden the Asian-Canadian perspective on these topics.

Maureen Hoskyn received the largest grant, at just under $500,000, for her research on the developmental differences in cognitive functions in children who speak more than one language.

Total funding levels from the SSHRC, which includes types of grants other than the Insight categories, has remained steady over the last five years. In contrast, the natural and health sciences at SFU have seen total funding from their respective federal grant institutions steadily increase.

Earlier this year, the SSHRC also awarded SFU approximately $5.4 million in Partnership grants, which are given to joint research ventures between universities or with another institution. Two projects received just under $2.5 million each, one looking at the role of the arts in social change, and the other, a seven-year effort at preserving Aboriginal culture and language. Two more projects received about $200,000 each.

SFU’s reputation has seen marked advancement in the last decade, jumping from 28th to 12th place on the QS World Rankings list for Canadian universities. In Times Higher Education 2013 rankings for universities under 50 years old, the university came in second in Canada and 30th in the world. Sixty per cent of both lists’ criteria are based on research and research influence.

Hot Off the Presses

0

Michael-Hingston-photo-credit-Bridget-Gutteridge-Hingston

The Peak: a university newspaper with a hard-hitting mix of inflammatory editorials, hastily thrown-together comics and reviews, and a news section run the only way self-taught student journalists know how — sloppily.”

So begins the tagline for Michael Hingston’s debut novel The Dilettantes, the latest take on the campus novel which takes place inside the offices of SFU’s very own student newspaper.

Hingston, a freelance journalist and weekly columnist for The Edmonton Journal, is a former Peak editor himself, and remembers his days at the paper with equal parts fondness and embarrassment. “I’m not able to distinguish my time at The Peak from my time at university,” he recalls. “It was really linked for me.”

The novel, which has received glowing reviews from such publications as Quill and Quire and The Winnipeg Review, centers around Alex and Tracy, two of The Peak’s editors who are forced to contend with a pesky daily, Metro, stealing their already dwindling readership. Hingston wrote the novel partly as a tribute to his experiences at the paper.

“I wanted to come up with some way to crystallise that experience, so I wouldn’t just forget it, because I knew it was a unique time in my life,” he says. “Pretty late into my degree, a couple of months from graduating, I had this realization that I’d subliminally been gathering this material, living out this really strong story.” He also cites the university as being central to the book’s appeal. “I think the campus and the culture at SFU is really interesting, and I find it more interesting the further I get away from it.”

Having graduated in 2008 with a degree in English Literature, Hingston began his career in journalism as a freelance writer for a variety of publications in Edmonton. His work has since appeared in The Globe and Mail, National Post, and even Vancouver’s own Georgia Straight. The Dilettantes is Hingston’s first foray into the world of fiction, and boasts a confident writing style that contrasts with his lack of formal experience. “I don’t think I’d ever finished a short story before this novel,” he laughs. “It was really the first thing I tried.” When I ask him if he has plans to continue writing novels, he responds, “Deciding to take that plunge again feels a little masochistic. But it’s pretty tempting.”

“I’m not able to distinguish my time at The Peak from my time at university. It was really linked for me.” – Michael Hingston, author of The Dilettantes

It’s hard to blame him for being hesitant to start again: the publishing process can be unforgiving, especially for a debut novelist. “When the fiftieth agent says ‘no’ to you, there’s a part of your brain that says, ‘maybe this is nothing,’” he says. Luckily, the stars aligned, and The Dilettantes was picked up by Freehand Books, a publishing company based in Calgary. The novel was released on September 10 of this year, just in time for the fall semester. “Every step of the process has been a miracle . . . I learned stuff as I went and I made it better as I went along, but I really didn’t learn on a basic level what the book was about until the publisher had accepted it.”

Above all, Hingston says perseverance and a good work ethic are the keys to a successful career in writing. “The people I really respect and glob onto as a writer are not even necessarily novelists; it’s more the work ethic that I find that I respond to. It’s people like Louis CK: every year he renews his act, he forces himself to write something new. There’s something you learn from just finishing, standing back and looking at it, and then just jumping into the next thing.”

However, constant reinvention is central to the writing process: whether you’re working at The Peak or The Edmonton Journal, you need to be able to maintain a steady flow of ideas and creations in order to make a living. Thankfully, Hingston seems to enjoy it. “I really find myself just wanting to be constantly producing, and constantly throwing new ideas out there and just seeing what sticks,” he tells me.

Since its release, The Dilettantes has attracted attention from former Peak staff and contributors alike. Anyone who has ever written for our paper will surely recognize more than a few of the book’s references: the Spider-Man notebook, the inanity of covering Clubs Days, the difficulty of spotting our offices on the map.

On his blog, Books in the Kitchen, Hingston has photos from his time at The Peak, where he held positions as Opinions Editor, Copy Editor and Arts Editor. “It’s an amazing experience to be given that much freedom,” he says, “to have all of your weird 3:00 a.m. ideas put into a printing press that is gonna make ten thousand copies of this thing that you just thought up.”

Once the interview is done, he asks me how much the office has changed since he worked there. But after speaking to him and reading The Dilettantes, I struggle to think that it’s changed much at all.

Michael Hingston will be hosting a launch party for The Dilettantes on October 4 at 6:30 p.m. at Pulpfiction Books on Main Street.

TransLink to review public art policy

0

WEB-Translink-sean marshall-flickr copy

TransLink is currently reviewing its policy on public arts after the recent outcry drawn from the announcement that $615,000 is to be spent on three public art installations at Skytrain stations. TransLink approved the installation of pieces at Main Street-Science World, Metrotown, and Commercial-Broadway stations, as part of an upgrade to the Expo Line.

Nancy Olewiler, TransLink board of directors chair, defended the practice of paying for art at different points of the transit system, but said that the method of selecting pieces and the amounts spent are to be reviewed, according to Burnaby Newsleader.

Gordon Price, a former member of Vancouver City Council and the current director of SFU’s City Program also defended the concept of public art pieces at transit stops, saying, “For other cities like Vienna or Helsinki that are on the list of most livable cities [in the world], these questions wouldn’t even come up.”

He continued, “If the city didn’t consider high architectural design or pubic arts, the public probably would be, if not outraged, [saying] ‘What are you thinking?’”

For Price, who also served on TransLink’s board of directors in 1999, the issue is one of quality of life. “Infrastructure shouldn’t just be nuts and bolts,” he stated, “It should be about, how can we make city life better? What can we do to add to the quality of life, not the quantity of life, if everything is measured in dollars or even in cents?”

 

TransLink has recently announced the cancellation of several fare discount programs.

 

Price also pointed to the art pieces inside YVR airport, such as “The Spirit of Haida Gwaii, The Jade Canoe,”  that give the airport its reputation for award-winning architecture and art collections.

“What we are saying to people is if you come by plane, you are someone we have enough [money] for and we’re going to make our airport an attractive place, but once you’re on transit, that’s for poor people,” stated Price. “We don’t want to say that. That’s why we have public art policies.”

Price believes that contributions should be put in from both the public and the private sector towards projects such as this, and pointed to the provincial government’s willingness to spend large sums of money on art galleries and projects around the province.

Bryan Kinney, an SFU criminology professor, pointed to the positive emotions that transit users could experience from the art installations, as a product of our evolution.

“From running around on the grass for thousands of years . . . we evolved to a point that we appreciate the ability to see open spaces as a defence mechanism and as a hunting advantage,” Kinney said. “People tend to feel better when they are in open spaces . . . Artwork has a similar effect. When there is artwork, I would feel it is a pretty safe area.”

The hefty $615,000 price tag is the main reason why people object to the project. Thesea re funds which critics say could be used for a practical transit project, such as adding another bus route or lowering transit ticket prices, which have steadily increased over the last few years.

 

quotes1The real question is, how do you value your public transit?”

– Gordon Price, SFU City Program director

 

TransLink has recently announced the cancellation of several fare discount programs, such as FareSaver tickets and the Employee Pass Program, to come into effect in 2014. Spokesman Bob Paddon said the programs were found to be unfair during an internal review, according to CTV News.

For Price, the question boils down to value. “The real question is, how do you value your public transit? Does it have dignity, respect, or is it valued the same way as we value other things?” he posited.

“Think about the amount of money government spends on an election campaign,” said Kinney, “Millions of dollars to get ad spaces to tell us one group is better than the other. What good does that do? But that’s the cost of modern society.”

 

*Correction: This article mentions that TransLink is reacting to public opinion with their decision to review the policy. However, according to Derek Zabel, TransLink media relations, TransLink had undertaken this initiative prior to any public interest.

Give up the fight

0

Tough and physical play has always been a great leveler, irrespective of the sport. While it doesn’t abrogate skill or finesse as factors separating victory from defeat, controlled and systemic physicality elevates competition from a mental and physical perspective.

Enshrining violence within the rules however, as it is in hockey, simply encourages a destructive spiral that reduces the game from its true form. Violence escalates from an aggressive mindset to a mindset of aggression, and we as fans are simply treated to a spectacle of barbarism that undermines the true qualities of the game. Simply put, it’s a waste of time, it’s dangerous and we should get rid of it.

An article in The Peak two weeks ago addressed fighting in hockey, advocating its continuance and importance to the game’s fidelity as a deterrent to ‘illegal’ violence. Let’s disregard this NRA-esque ‘fight guns with more guns’ mentality momentarily and talk about the game.

Hockey is unique in that the boundaries of acceptable physicality are extremely relaxed — it is often unclear exactly where the line lands. As a player stepping onto the ice, it’s impossible given the NHL’s case-by-case subjectivity to know what constitutes acceptable versus unacceptable; this is a massive failure on the part of the league to draw bright-lines.

Coming from a Canucks fan, it’s easy to write off the following as sour grapes, but the 2011 Stanley Cup Finals was the worst officiated series I’d ever watched. It was impossible to tell what a foul was and what wasn’t — the officials themselves appeared unsure as to when to blow their whistles. The most surreal moment of indecisiveness was the ejection of Aaron Rome (never before labeled as a “dirty player”) in Game 3.

The lasting memory for me was the zebra leading him to the penalty box, before realizing Nathan Horton was seriously injured. The official then promptly sent Rome to the dressing room and issued a ten minute major and game misconduct. I blew a gasket – why did he change his mind? What elevated the offense to that extreme?

This is the NHL’s idiocy: the intent to injure is irrelevant to the degree of discipline. Instead, the injury resulting from the action is the dominating factor. Aaron Rome copped a four game suspension in those finals for a borderline late hit while Brad Marchand rained punches with no repercussions as no injury resulted.

This inconsistency is why goonism and fighting thrives in the NHL. That reckless and dangerous hits may be ignored if the victim is fortunate enough to get up and skate away simply feeds into a mindset of violence and aggression and demands that players take the proverbial law into their own literal hands.

But fighting demeans the sport. Hockey can still be the physical and violent game for which purists salivate, but fighting is bush league tomfoolery that adds nothing substantive. In the moment fights may excite and raise energy levels, but so do goals, big (and legal) hits, and stunning saves.

The international game, for instance, bans fighting and uses much stricter officiating standards, and often produces thrilling, memorable hockey games such as the 2010 Olympic gold medal game. The thrill of sport, pure and unadulterated, is what I as a paying fan, want to see. I can pay five dollars for a beer league game to watch halfwit self-proclaimed ‘enforcers’ chase each other around the ice to throw punches.

American Express CEO vows to attract more customers with bad credit

0

kenneth

NEW YORK — In a brief moment of honesty, American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault announced to reporters that the company’s recent financial difficulties had to do with attracting “the wrong kind of customer.”

The majority of American Express’s customers were well-to-do, successful young adults with a good sense of financial stability — people Chenault described as the “leaching, filthy, undesirables” of the credit card industry.

“What we need more of are irresponsible, impulsive spenders who don’t know where their next paycheck is coming from,” Chenault  explained to reporters, moments before announcing that he would be pulling all American Express advertisements from Public Radio, the History Channel, and the NY Times to shift their focus to the Fox News network, TLC, and Pop music radio stations.

“Let’s face it, we make our money from people who can’t pay their bills on time. The kind of people who buy high-heels or basketball jerseys without thinking about the consequences. Why would we advertise in a newspaper? That just does not make sense,” Chenault noted before confirming that he didn’t care whether or not his customers could read, what mattered was that they bought stuff they couldn’t afford. “People who pay their bills on time are not the kind of people our company wants to be associated with.”

American Express’s new ad campaign “Don’t worry, you’ll figure it out,” launches later this month.