Home Blog Page 1178

Lover’s quarrel: Cindy Sherman meets Dzunuk’wa

0

satelitegallery1

Both reading break and Valentine’s Day are considered the right time to make those previously unthought-of chance encounters. Maybe it’s the winter doldrums that push us to step into the unexpected — an opportune excuse to shake things up. Perhaps it is just time to try something new.

That being said, there is an exhibition at the Satellite Gallery which started on Feb. 14 with a similar concept in mind: Cindy Sherman meets Dzunuk’wa is a collective exhibit culled from the private collection of Satellite Gallery founder Michael O’Brian, and his wife Inna Vlassev O’Brian.

As the title of the show implies, more than 40 works were selected without regard to possible historical, cultural or thematic assemblages, in order to place the individual pieces in close proximity to their proposed aesthetic soulmates — without rejecting the odd lovers’ quarrel, either.

Cindy Sherman’s painted nails and made-up face are another clue that she isn’t quite meant to be the girl-next-door.

The juxtaposition of the two title pieces are a case in point. On the one hand, Cindy Sherman looks out from her “Untitled” c-print self-portrait from 2002/4 wearing a leopard print shirt that covers a distinctive, soon-to-be motherly figure. Her painted nails and made-up face are another clue that she isn’t quite meant to be the girl-next-door.

The piece is characteristic of the artist’s exploration of female gender roles as well as her particular style: halfway between garish and graceful.

On the adjacent wall is hung her ill-fated twin, “Dzunuk’wa, the Wild Woman of the Woods,” a large red-cedar mask sculpted by Kwakwaka’wakw artist Beau Dick in 2012. Here, the horse hair mane and puckered red lips remind us of the giant’s hunger for human children and her self-conscious attempt at seduction. Not such a far cry from what Sherman is alluding to, but with quite a different sense for the otherworldly.

BRIANJUNGEN

Chosen by a curatorial quartet that includes Cate Rimmer (Charles H. Scott Gallery), Keith Wallace (Morris and Helen Belkin Gallery, UBC), Karen Duffek (Museum of Anthropology, UBC) and Helga Pakasaar (Presentation House Gallery), the intent was to mimic the process of building a private collection through fortuitous relationships.

While most artistic comparisons are meant to be in close proximity within the various zones of the gallery, some concordances span the entire showroom area, as a long-distance couple would time and space. These were my favourite pieces in the show.

The first is a square assemblage by Brian Jungen found on the wall near the gallery entrance. Titled “Blanket No.9”, the artist combines two professional sport jerseys to create an abstract weave motif of geometric design.

At the opposite end of the gallery can be found another textile work that draws you in with its finesse: the Jacquard tapestry “Self-Portrait” by Chuck Close. The artist’s impressive gaze is matched only by the viewer’s pleasure at unraveling the multiplicity of threads that meander from one piece to the next.

SFU appoints new VP, research

0

SFU will welcome Joy Johnson as its new VP, research this fall. Current VP, research, Mario Pinto will finish his second five-year term this August, whereafter Johnson will step into the role.

Currently, Johnson is the scientific director for the Institute of Gender and Health at the Canadian Institutes of Health and Research; she is also a professor in the School of Nursing at UBC. Her tenure as SFU’s fifth VP, research begins Sept. 1, 2014.

In a media release, President Andrew Petter said, “We are incredibly fortunate to have Dr. Johnson joining SFU as our next vice-president, research.” In that same release, Pinto added that he was “delighted” to have Johnson succeed him and that her extensive and varied experience “bodes well for the future of research at SFU.”

Johnson will be moving away from working primarily in the field of health to what she called a, “broader mandate.” She said, “Taking on the position of vice-president, research I’m going to be concerned about developing research capacity in all areas of research.”

She expressed her excitement about the change and explained the allure of a position at SFU. One factor she mentioned was the vision of SFU as an engaged university, and she looks forward to the opportunity to engage with the community across three campuses.

For Johnson, the prospect of a younger university also appeals to her: “[With] younger, comprehensive universities like Simon Fraser, there’s a lot of creativity that can take place, a spirit of adventure.”

Though excited to begin her new position, Johnson acknowledges that it will come with its own challenges. She stated, “I think it’s always a bit of a mistake to come in with too many plans when you’re taking up a role like this.” She made it clear that her first priority is to become thoroughly familiar with the university and what its research capacities are.

She continued, “I really want to get to know the researchers at Simon Fraser, get to know what the challenges are for researchers, and then start to look at ways we can strengthen research capacity at SFU. Before I can move forward on any of that, I really need to stop and learn about the institution in more detail.”

The next obstacle she alluded to is one that she said affects researchers all over Canada. “Many researchers are concerned that there’s not enough funding for research,” she said. “It’s going to be a challenge to try and find ways to help the excellent researchers at SFU make sure that they have the resources that they need to keep their research going, and to help grow the research at SFU.”

In anticipation of next fall when she will officially take up her position, Johnson says she will be setting up various meetings over the next month with the current VP, research, as well as President Petter, in order to prepare herself for this exciting new challenge.

Updating the Status

0

o-WARRANT-CELL-PHONE-facebook

Why do we need all these gender options, anyway?

Because not everyone thinks of themselves as a man or a woman, and that’s okay. Most people tend to place themselves into one of these two categories, but there’s all sorts of folks who don’t feel like they fit into either box — or that they fit into both — and their gender identity is no less valid than anyone else’s. In supplying 56 custom gender options (in lieu of a previous three), Facebook has recognized that gender identity is much more complex than the usual binary.

Gender is a set of culturally learned practices, and a tool through which people build and reflect their identities.

We tend to be taught from a young age that gender is inextricable from biological sex, but that just isn’t the case. Though your doctor more than likely labelled you as either male or female as soon as you were born, it’s ultimately up to you to choose which gender suits you best — and it very well might be neither of those choices.

Sex and gender are totally separate terms. Sex refers to your chromosomes, your genitals and everything else to do with biology (to be clear, we’re not talking the verb sex, which is something totally different). Gender, however, is a set of culturally learned practices, and a tool through which people build and reflect their identities. Whatever behaviours you think of as “masculine” or “feminine” are that way because of the culture we live in, and the beliefs it supports and indoctrinates.

In allowing people to choose the gender that best reflects them, Facebook has taken an important step in recognizing the scope of gender identities and respecting the right of every individual to choose whichever term best reflects who they are.

I’ve never heard of some of these terms. What do they mean?

I’m glad you asked. For starters, most of you reading this are probably cisgender — that means your gender matches up with your biological sex. For example, if you’ve got male genetalia and chromosomes and you identify as a man, that makes you cisgender, or cis.

Trans folks identify with a separate gender than their biological sex dictates — using an asterisk after the term trans implies that you’re including each and every gender option (and sex option) that a trans person might be. Some trans people will include their preferred gender identity after the word trans, such as “trans man”; others will settle for “trans” or “transgender.”

Agender people don’t identify with any gender, and feel they’re better off not having a gender at all. Gender fluid, genderqueer and gender nonconforming people all fit somewhere in the middle of the gender spectrum, and some don’t tie themselves down to a single definition, preferring to define their identity on a day-to-day basis.

Most of you reading this are probably cisgender — that means your gender matches up with your biological sex.

Bigender people — you guessed it — identify with both male and female genders, and pangender folks identify as all genders at once. Two-spirit is a term used in over 130 First Nations tribes; it describes those who don’t fit on either side of the gender binary, but have aspects of both male and female genders.

I’m a cisgender woman. Should I choose the “woman” option, or the “cis woman” option? What’s the difference?

Either! Facebook’s custom options are extensive, and to be fair, there’s a little bit of overlap. There is, however a difference between these two terms: a cis woman is a very specific description of a unique gender identity, whereas the term “woman” is a lot more interpretable, and can be used to describe a whole subset of genders. If in doubt, choose the term you feel best describes who you are, and what gender you best identify with — however you would describe yourself to your friends, family, and partner.

What do pronouns have to do with all of this?

Along with their new gender options, Facebook has fine-tuned its user settings by including a drop-down menu with pronoun choices: him, her, and the agendered them. The pronouns you use to identify someone are an important part of how you relate to that person, and it’s your job to make sure that you’re using the correct pronouns with whomever you meet. Facebook’s inclusion of pronoun customization is a useful tool for people too nervous to ask someone for their preferred gender pronouns — or PGPs — in person. It’s also a nice way for people to dictate which PGPs they prefer without having to constantly correct the people around them.

Why is there still an “other” option? Doesn’t this cover all the bases?

Not quite. Like all facets of your identity (style, tastes, personality, and so on), gender is a process of constant reinvention — and like all inventions, some of them have yet to be discovered. Despite the admittedly exhaustive nature of Facebook’s custom options, kudos to them for leaving the door open for new possibilities, and for giving those who don’t feel like putting their gender into a single category — or feel like it isn’t anyone else’s damn business — a choice to match.

Tippy Top Ten: SFU Road Construction

0

Here are the Tippy Top Ten worst things about the road construction at SFU…

10. It’s really messing up previously super convenient trip to school on top of a mountain

9.Your Sherpa wants a raise

8. New roads will be useless in five years when we all have flying cars

7. Will add 5-30 minutes of bus stop small talk about how bus is 5-30 minutes late

6. Future smooth roads will make us more susceptible to attacks from invading Mongolian army

5. It’ll force you to drive through UniverCity and remind you there’s a place called “UniverCity”

4. Soon won’t be able to blame bumpy road for arousal on the 145 anymore

3. With legitimate excuse for being late, “murdered parents” story will go to waste

2. Will inspire too many students to transfer into Construction faculty

1. Even after they’re finished, the roads will still lead you to SFU

Satellite Signals

0

5396001815_6505704ba0_o
Woodward’s

Over the weekend of Feb. 20, the Human Rights Watch Traveling Film Festival was held at the Djavad Mowafaghian Cinema. The event presented highlighted films from HRW’s annual festivals in London and New York.

Through storytelling, the featured films illustrate the reality of human rights abuse in order to evoke empathy and challenge each viewer to demand universal justice.

 

Surrey

 

Leader of SFU Surrey’s Digital Health Hub Maryam Sadeghi’s venture, Molescope, won first in the annual Coast Capital Savings Venture Prize competition; the prize for first place is $3,000.

Molescope is an app that helps patients keep track of suspicious moles that could potentially prove to be cancerous. Sadeghi and Molescope also gained recognition this past fall when she was named Student Entrepreneur of the Year 2013.
Vancouver

On Wednesday, Feb. 19, SFU Public Square hosted their monthly “Lunch Poems at SFU.” The noon-hour event featured readings by two noteworthy Canadian poets, Ray Hsu and Joanne Arnott.

Hsu has published over 150 poems and two award-winning books of poetry. He has taught creative writing at the SFU Writer’s studio, as well as in a US prison. Arnott, a Métis writer and activist, published her first, award-winning book of poetry in 1991. She often assesses and judges poetry for prestigious Canadian literary awards.

Questionable Information: Bing

0

The popular phrase “just Bing it” predates the Internet by 10 years.

A modern Canadian citizenship bill

0

WEB-canada citizenship-Mark Burnham

One of the most consistent themes of the current Conservative government has been developing and promoting this country’s history and sense of self.

A week and a half ago, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Chris Alexander tabled a bill that will continue this development of national pride, one that will drastically alter the process by which a person can become a Canadian citizen.

The bill includes a variety of changes that will make it more difficult to become a Canadian citizen. Our country currently has some of the most lenient rules regarding citizenship, which has led to Canada being used by people who commit residency fraud, for which the RCMP is currently investigating more than 8,000 cases.

The new bill also addresses those who spend the minimum amount of time in Canada required to become a Canadian citizen, while spending the majority of their lives outside the country, unaware of our culture.

Canadian citizenship is a privilege that Canadians need to start taking more seriously.

The first of these changes will raise the residency requirement from the current three years to four, with time spent in the country before obtaining permanent residence status not counting towards the requirement.

Though this may upset some, the new residency requirement is still a full year less than both the United States and the United Kingdom. This new requirement will also allow for a greater integration into Canadian society and will serve, according to Alexander, as “a demonstration of one’s commitment to reside here and to participate.”

Another major change, and one that I cannot endorse enough, it the change to the language and knowledge test. Under the current system, applicants aged 18 to 54 must pass both a language and a knowledge test, and may take the knowledge test with an interpreter present.

The new legislation says anyone between the ages of 14 to 65 must pass both tests in either French or English without the use of an interpreter. It substantiates the idea that those who have been here long enough to fulfil the residency and citizenship requirements should be able to speak one of our official languages, something that has been in place in many other countries for quite some time.

This bill will also address the issue of the remaining Lost Canadians, extending them and their children retroactive citizenship. These are the descendants of Canadians born prior to Canada’s first citizenship law in 1947, who were ineligible under current laws for a variety of reasons. Many of them have always believed themselves to be Canadians, but officially had no status as Canadian citizens. This bill will finally fix that wrong.

This bill also carries some harsh penalties. The current penalty for residency fraud is a mere $1,000, not much of a deterrent. The new fines jump to $100,000 for immigrants falsely claiming to be living in Canada in order to maintain their status and thus qualify for citizenship.

This bill will also allow the Canadian government to strip citizenship from Canadians who commit acts of treason, engage in terrorism, or take up arms against Canada, so long as they are dual nationals. This portion has been heavily criticized, but it makes sense: if you are willing to take up arms against this country, you should not be among its citizenry.

Canadian citizenship is not a right, it is a privilege, and one that Canadians need to start taking more seriously. This bill is a solid step in the right direction, and shows the world that we as Canadians consider citizenship in our country to be a thing of great value.

Clan win on Senior’s Day

0

It was Senior’s Day for the Clan women’s basketball team and the final home game for seniors Chelsea Reist, Kia van Laare, Rebecca Langmead, and Marie-Line Petit, as well as senior team manager Alex Mackenzie. In a proper send-off, the Clan won their fourth straight game, 70–59, against the St. Martin’s Saints, despite a sloppy second half.

The game got off to a slow start after a 35 minute ceremony delay, with no scoring in the first minute. Head coach Bruce Langford, unhappy with the pace of play, called a timeout early while the game remained scoreless. The timeout was quite effective as Reist, one of the seniors playing her last home game, opened the scoring on a three-point play, turning the momentum in SFU’s favour.

For the rest of the first period, the Clan were on top as the Saints didn’t score until the Clan had already scored eight points — including an Erin Chambers three-pointer. The Saints had numerous defensive woes, highlighted by two straight fast-break baskets by van Laare.

Though not as tight as the previous game against the Wolves, the Clan still played a great defensive game allowing just 18 points in the first half for a score of 39–18 at the break.

Mirroring the game against the Wolves, however, was the Clan’s weaker second half during which they allowed SMU to close the gap. Though the Clan took quite a few fouls in the first, the Saints only started to punish them for it in the second, scoring on 13 of 17 free throw attempts, as compared to their 50 per cent average from the stripe in the first.

As the second frame went on, SMU kept scoring, while SFU struggled to hit baskets. The Saints gave a formidable pushback, winning the period 41–31. However, it was not enough and the Clan won 70–59.

“It was a little rough at times,” said Reist after her team’s final home game of the season. “There were a few turnovers, and things we could have cleaned up a little bit, but we had some strong points in the game and I think we’ll focus on those going ahead.”

But for many, the focus was on Reist and her fellow seniors, who left West Gym triumphant one last time.

“It’s a bit of roller coaster,” she said. “I’m super happy that I’ve been able to play [here]. Obviously it’s really sad, and I’m going to miss it a lot, but it was fun.”

But with the playoffs looming, the ride’s not over just yet.

Clan win big at home

1

Sango Niang’s previous career-high night was, unfortunately, a losing effort for the Clan. This time, however, the guard’s effort was not in vain, as Niang set a new career-best with 36 points in SFU’s 112–99 win over Central Washington.

The Clan’s win snapped a three-game losing streak, avenging a 96–79 loss earlier in the season. A surprisingly tight, dominant first period for the Clan gave way to a nail biter of a second.

Although the Wildcats won first tip off, the Clan scored the first five points, including a three-pointer by forward Ibrahim Appiah. CWU responded quickly scoring 14 straight points in just over three minutes. Sloppy defence and poorly timed fouls contributed to the Wildcats’ offensive burst.

That pressure would not last, however, as senior David Gebru got the momentum back for SFU with a layup at 14:13, after a well-timed steal by Taylor Dunn. The clan clawed their way back up the scoreboard with guard Sango Niang making the court his playground.

The Clan reclaimed the lead midway through the first — pushing the score to 19–18 — but did not truly explode offensively until after Niang scored his second three-pointer of the night. With the score 29–27 for the Clan, SFU just kept draining three-pointers until they led by 19, 58–39, to end the half. With all due credit to the offence, the defence also got tighter by the minute only allowing 12 more points from the Wildcats over the final 7:37 of the period.

Niang notched 22 points in the first period alone, nearly reaching his previous career high for a game (26 points) set only two games ago in a close loss to Seattle Pacific University.

Although the Clan opened the second period’s scoring, their defence lapsed at times, allowing the Wildcats to get within six with just three minutes to play. But SFU got going again just in time, and nailed their late-game free throws.

Justin Cole, who scored 16 points and two three-pointers, ended the game with a slam dunk on a steal from Niang in the last half-second, taking the score to 112–99 and keeping the Wildcats out of triple digits.

It was a decisive way to end a stretch of three losses where it seemed the Clan were getting better but with no real results. In this game, there were results: SFU notched a team-high in points and have now tied their previous NCAA best in conference wins with three. And three games still remain for the Clan to beat that record.

 

Campus Roadwork Update

0

WEB-road repair-mark burnham

Starting Monday, Feb. 24, all buses leaving Burnaby Mountain will return to their usual routes.This means that buses will go down the mountain via University Drive West and the bus stop by residences will once again be in service.

This alteration is due to recent feedback from the SFU community and will address the concerns of access to the residence bus stop as well as the increase in volume of traffic on University Drive East.

The detour up the mountain is to remain the same for the duration of the project, but this change in route will only be in effect until phase two of construction, which is scheduled to begin near the start of the summer semester.