Home Blog Page 4

SFU’s new Southeast Asian research initiative set to host its first event

0
A collage of Phone and Darren’s portraits, along with a map of Southeast Asia in the middle are pictured.
PHOTOS: Courtesy of SFU School for International Studies (Darren Byler), Putri Nabila / Unsplash (map), and tash takes pics (Phone Minh Thant)

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer

Editor’s note: The Peak’s arts & culture editor, Phone Min Thant, co-led this event. He was not involved in the editorial process of this article. 

The School for International Studies’ newly formed Southeast Asian research initiative will host its first event at SFU’s Vancouver campus on February 11. The ice breaker event aims to provide students curious about Southeast Asia a chance to discuss research regarding the region. It also aims to express the initiative’s future direction and bring together scholars from different post-secondary institutions in the Lower Mainland who study Southeast Asia, such as international studies professor Dr. Tamir Moustafa, political science professor Dr. Shivaji Mukherjee, and Capilano University political science professor Dr. David Matijasevich.

The Peak reached out to the event’s organizers and co-founders of the initiative, Phone Min Thant and associate professor Darren Byler, to learn more. Min Thant’s research focus is on China-Southeast Asia relations in the 21st century, while Byler’s is “the role of infrastructural state power in contemporary capitalism and colonialism in China, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia.”   

Min Thant explained that his experience at the 2025 Canadian Council for Southeast Asian Studies conference partly informed the creation of the Southeast Asian research initiative. “There’s so many universities with a very active Southeast Asian Studies program or at least a Southeast Asian collective,” he claimed. “I saw so many people from SFU who are really interested in Southeast Asia as a regional studies. I thought, why don’t we create a collective — a gathering of all these Southeast Asianists and group them into one place so that we can collectively inform each other of conferences and other events happening around Canada.” 

Both Min Thant and Byler highlighted the region’s importance to the study of international relations, with Byler noting the “hundreds of millions of people that live in Southeast Asia.” He said, “This is a site that has a number of growing economies that could be referred to as middle powers in the way that Canada is positioned.” 

Southeast Asia “offers lessons which can be applied to countries like the US,” Min Thant added. “You can see a lot of resurgence of authoritarianism, right-wing ideologies — Southeast Asia has seen all of that and has been seeing all that since independence” from several colonial powers in the 20th century.

Min Thant highlighted that the ice breaker will serve as a stepping stone for future Southeast Asia-centred events. “We were debating if we should jump right into action, maybe do a conference, a mini-SFU conference, or a research symposium. But, we realized we don’t really know who’s going to study Southeast Asia as a region,” he said. 

Byler said, “We’re hoping that because this is a student-led initiative, that keeping it a bit more informal, where everyone has a chance to contribute and we hope all voices can be heard, that students will feel a kind of ownership over the process and that they’ll want to get invested in building it.”

Min Thant emphasized that the event serves as a great opportunity for all students, regardless of their knowledge of the region. “You can learn from your peers, you can see what’s going on in Southeast Asia,” he said. “We might have discussions on current events in Southeast Asia, maybe co-authoring opportunities for papers.

“If you’re simply interested in Southeast Asia as a region, if you’re from Southeast Asia, drop by and see how it is and maybe consider joining the initiative!”

— Phone Min Thant, event organizer and collective co-founder of the Southeast Asian Research Initiative

You’re not better than polyamorous folks

0
an illustration of three people hanging out. Two of them are sitting on a couch. The third person is standing next to them holding flowers.
ILLUSTRATION: Cassandra Nguyen / The Peak

By: C Icart, Co-Editor-in-Chief

I’m just going to cut to the chase: the hate around polyamory is weird. It comes from all sides of the political spectrum and from individuals of all sexual orientations, but today I’m talking to the monogamous queers making “why do poly people look like that?” comments or jokes. While sometimes it can just be throwing shade in good fun, by ostracizing people who are alternative, visibly queer, gender nonconforming, and considered not “conventionally attractive,” you sound exactly like queerphobic bigots. Repeating talking points that misogynists commonly use online normalizes judgment. 

Polyamory, or consensual nonmonogamy, is the practice of having multiple intimate relationships, whether sexual or just romantic, with the full knowledge and consent of all parties involved.” This is slightly different from polygamy, where one person is married to multiple people. According to the Canadian government, polygamy is illegal because “there is a growing consensus that polygyny [a form of polygamy where one man has multiple wives] violates women’s right to be free from all forms of discrimination.” It’s important not to conflate polyamory with hierarchical polygamous marriages where spouses are exploited. 

Polyamory is an umbrella term that encompasses many different types of nonmonogamous relationship styles. This can include throuples or triads where all three people are dating each other. A lesser-known style is solo polyamory, where “​​someone has multiple intimate relationships with people but has an independent or single lifestyle.” While throuples and triads challenge the norm of being in a committed relationship with only one person, solo polyamory challenges the idea that people must aspire to “​​traditional relationship milestones and goals,” like living with a partner, merging finances, and getting married. Looking into polyamorous relationship styles as a monogamous person has pushed me to think about the norms and expectations I’ve internalized when it comes to romantic relationships.

While not all polyamorous people are queer, there is considerable overlap between both communities and both challenge heteronormative monogamy. Heteronormativity places “heterosexuality as a social norm or as superior to other sexual orientations.” I bring this up because I can’t help but read this impulse from queer people to make fun of polyamorous folks as a form of homonormativity. Homonormativity refers queer people who conform to heteronormative ideals. Embracing homonormativity is a strategy that is often used to gain social acceptance. Tangibly, this can look like upholding institutions like marriage and the military by seeking to be included in them. This assimilationist mentality does not question why state-sanctioned ​marriage should be “​the sole pathway to economic and legal security” and instead accepts it as long as same-sex couples can do it too. Using the strategy of highlighting similarities and saying that “we’re just like you, except gay” has been effective in securing some rights, but it also implies, “if we weren’t just like you, it would be OK to marginalize us.”

So, when a TikTok asking, “why do poly people look like that?” went viral last year, what was implied is that they look different; as in, they don’t fit the imposed norm. Multiple people stitched the video with clips from polyamorous content creators to illustrate what the original poster presumably meant by “that.” The clips predominantly feature people with facial piercings and bright hair. Most of the comments on this type of content are mean, saying things like they look like they smell. While the original video doesn’t say it, it’s clear the comments interpreted “that” as shorthand for “ugly.” Many poly people also decided to stitch the clip embracing their style and looks, challenging the assumption that it’s bad to look like “that,” in this case usually alternative. 

Having conversations about polyamorous people where you judge them based on their looks says a lot about what is actually bothering you. While this may not have been your intention, by making fun of polyamorous people you imply that not being conventionally attractive is bad. It sounds eerily similar to the incel forums writing about Becky, who is described as “a feminist who ‘will likely die [sic] her hair green, pink, or blue after attending college.’” It also sounds like the common homophobic phrase, “I don’t care if you’re gay, just don’t rub it in my face.”

While I understand that you’re mad at your ex for trying to open up your relationship even though you were clearly not OK with that (which is awful), the solution is not to start parroting discourse that is common in incel/queerphobic spaces.

People like the person who made the viral TikTok I’ve been referencing will use your comments and jokes to prove that, even within the 2SLGBTQIA+ community, there are “regular” people who are also judging people who “look like that.” At the end of the day, you’re punching down and revealing to everyone around you that you’re not as progressive as you want to appear. In an effort to distance yourself from stereotypes of degeneracy and hypersexuality, you want to let everyone know that you’re one of the “normal ones.” The problem is they’re not going to pick you, and when queer rights are under attack, this affects all of us, no matter how we look.

Long Story Short: Romance is a sidequest but the prize is the friends I made along the way

0
Three women sitting together in a bedroom laughing.
PHOTO: cottonbros studio / Pexels

By: Noeka Nimmervoll, Staff Writer

I have been in my fair share of serious relationships since I was a teenager. They’ve given me some of the most wonderful experiences — loving someone with your whole being and sharing a life is an incredibly special thing. They’ve also provided me with a mirror: relationships tend to show you the sides of yourself that you were hoping to avoid. Am I single, you may ask? Yes, girl, yes, I am. I have no regrets about my relationships, in large part because of the friends I made along the way. 

The longest-lasting impact of being in romantic relationships, for me, has been meeting people through my partners. Some of the people I’ve met have become long-term friends, who I love. I sometimes think I’ve made some questionable dating choices, but I’m always reassured of my taste by the people who my exes surround themselves with. The friendships which came from multiple ex-partners have shown me that platonic love is so strong, and can certainly be more resilient than romantic love. The girls I know as a result of my exes make me feel like a divorced mom, saying shit like, “I’ll always love them because they brought you into my life.” These girls are funny, intelligent, strong, brave, and so so sexy. I love them so much and our bonds are stronger than any relationship I’ve been in. 

In romantic relationships, I have always struggled to be honest about my physical boundaries and my energy levels. Once a certain level of intimacy has been established, I find it hard to say, “I don’t want to be touched,” or, “I don’t want to talk right now,” without hurting the other person’s feelings. There always seems to be the underlying fear of losing them, which is a part of relationships that I don’t like at all. Every scenario feels like a reflection of our situation; if we talk every day and we start talking less frequently, does that mean we’re not doing well? If I bring him to a family event, does that mean we’re really serious? If I don’t like his mom, does that mean something wrong with him will come up down the line?  

I don’t feel that stress with my girlfriends. It feels honest to say, “I feel like shit, can we just hang out today?” The girls get me, and they’ll understand if I want to leave early and be home by myself, or if I need to take a bit of space. We weave our way into each other’s lives wherever it works, and if things get weird, we can always take some space. The timeline of a friendship isn’t as stressful to me because it feels more secure; you know you love each other, and that your relationship will naturally wax and wane over time. 

Platonic love is unselfish, where romantic love holds the risk of becoming transactional. I have certainly made some sacrifices in romance that friendships don’t require. Like, “I do not like your mom but I’ll smile during this monthly family dinner that I’m obliged to join” or “you gave me head so now I feel obliged to give you head. I don’t know about you, but I do not do that for my friends. It can get really difficult to balance obligations and personal boundaries in romance. It’s kind of awkward, especially while you’re still getting to know each other, and it takes a ton of skill in self-knowledge and communication to make it feel mutually respectful. 

Beyond all that, we often want to be in romantic relationships because of the way they make us feel. That is not the full picture, but that’s always made me so uncomfortable about romance. It’s not specifically me that you want; it’s a feeling that I provide to you. It can get a little icky! With my girls, I want to be around them; their attitude, personality, and uniqueness. It’s a real kind of love, and it’s not transactional. I would do anything for them.

Romantic love is a beautiful part of life; of course it is. It’s just optional. We don’t need someone who sees us in a different light than anyone else. What we need is someone who’s got our backs. Friends always have my back. Like, last year, when I was in the thick of a messy breakup, my friend opened her home to me and helped me get all my shit back. I’ll never forget that. 

I am no longer looking for romance in my life. My ultimate goal is to have an army of girlfriends that share values and support each other to the bone.

This is my Sex and the City dream (minus the sex) where I have a gaggle of girlfriends that share their dreams and discuss their lives without fear of judgement or reprehension. Thank you, ex-partners, for getting me one step closer to my dream! To my girlfriends, I love you so much.

Love and Anarchy: The perfect TV show for this Valentine’s

0
PHOTO: Mehakdeep Toor / The Peak

By: Mason Mattu, Section Editor

What does the future of the publishing industry, playing a youthful game involving lipstick, swimming in a pool naked, anti-capitalist conversations, and a steamy workplace relationship all have in common? It’s Love and Anarchy, a Netflix Swedish rom-com that is the most refreshing thing you can watch this Valentine’s season. 

The show follows the story of Sofie Rydman, a married, middle-aged mother of two, as she enters a new consulting position at a failing publishing house. Here, she begins an affair with a 20-something-year-old IT temp named Max. However, their relationship isn’t anything seen in a typical office age-gap romance like Babygirl. In a youthful game of truth or dare, the pair takes turns holding Sofie’s lipstick. Whoever has the lipstick has to dare the other to do something unconventional, like walking backwards for an entire day, yelling at management, or even embarrassing themselves in front of authors. 

Yes, romance is prominent in the show, but it’s not at its core. For Sofie, who is trapped in a loveless relationship, this simple game tells her that it’s OK to be creative again. It’s alright to embrace her inner author and let go of the corporate world that she’s been trapped in. That there’s someone in life who can love both herself and her whimsical attitude without calling a therapist because of it (yes, her husband actually does that). While Max and Sofie have a consistent “will they, won’t they” throughout the two seasons of the show, it is clear that, no matter their fate, they have both taught each other to embrace the silly goofy side of them, to take life less seriously, and to truly fall in love with the mundane. 

Another prominent theme of the show is the struggle between capitalism and creativity within the publishing industry. Sofie was raised by a communist father who often stands outside of grocery stores with signs reading, “Stop consumerism.” As Sofie pushes for the publishing house to adapt to the “modern” (and ultra-capitalistic) landscape of the industry, her dad acts as a sort of devil’s advocate, reminding her that she once was in love with writing and literature, not after chasing dollar signs. 

What I like most about this show, beyond the nuanced and multilayered messaging, is the fact that each character is on their own journey.

Whether it’s Sofie and her interpersonal relationships, Max and his struggle with an always-displeased mother, and co-workers navigating the future of the publishing industry, everyone’s on their own journeys that are reflected within a wealth of subplots. I’ve never seen such a complex workplace comedy before. 

Perhaps the standout performance of the show belongs to Reine Brynolfsson and his role of Friedreich, a nearing-retirement literary agent who represents the old guard of the publishing industry. Adamantly against new developments, such as e-books and podcasting, he serves as a reminder of what literature ought to look like in an era of modernity. Though he always has something to say about “the radical left,” or “the woke agenda,” Friedreich is on a journey of acceptance of both himself, his age, and of the changing landscape. Brynolfsson is such a dynamic actor and was an outstanding choice for this role.

If I had one issue with this incredible show, it would be that the representation of anti-capitalist ideas is muddled. Often, the audience is left confused as to whether the show runner wants them to be on the side of embracing the commercialization of literature, or sticking with the old guard. Nonetheless, the message does become clear at the end of the show. 

Overall, I would strongly recommend anyone with some free time this Valentine’s Day to grab your partner, cuddle up, and watch a few episodes of Love and Anarchy. It’s a love story . . . but also so much more. 

The Peak’s rating: 4.5/5 raccoons. It’s a good show to watch — but maybe not with your parents (might be a little too spicy . . .)!

 

Queer Asian love stories about identity beyond acceptance

0
IMAGE: Courtesy of Fortissimo Films

By: Maya Barillas Mohan, Staff Writer

Queer movies incorporate sexuality into narratives that extend more broadly into self-identity, and how love is ultimately a force of collision. At the heart of two East Asian films I watched this week, tumultuous love stories unfold as characters contend with themselves in their relationships.

Struggles in love are much more complicated than the mechanics of social acceptance — a frenetic kind of desire swallows everyone, indiscriminately.

East Palace, West Palace (1996) 

Being gay is taboo in Beijing, where the movie’s protagonists, young writer A-Lan and police officer Xiao Shi, are based. This movie depicts desire with a focus on interior friction instead of social approval. Married to a woman but actively cruising, A-Lan accepts his society’s hostility. As intimacy is continually monologued as presupposed by or following brutality, A-Lan fades the hardships in his life behind how alive he feels when he cruises. Coalesced pain and satisfaction accumulate in A-Lan’s writing, but the stories he tells Xiao Shi during an interrogation overlap with lived real experiences.

Xiao Shi’s homophobia is a symptom of his own incompatible desires with his outwardly rigid identity. The dialogue-heavy movie unravels into an examination of the belief that suffering and intimacy are inseparable as the interrogator flips to become the interrogated.

The cinematography is beautiful, as it draws leisurely through parks and peeks voyeuristically through glass. Movements feel vibrantly choreographed as the characters dodge and return each other’s touch across the screen. Shown in rich colour, the film explicates sexual identity as something complicated, brutal, and ineffaceable.

Golden Delicious (2022) 

Set in Vancouver, this diaspora film follows Chinese Canadian Jake as he grapples with his identity in the context of his heritage, conflicting interests of photography and basketball, and complicated attractions to his long-term girlfriend and next-door neighbour. Typical of coming of age stories, Jake’s identity emerges from a variety of conflicting influences that contradict vicarious expectations imposed by his immigrant parents. While his classmates broadcast their lives, Jake hides behind the camera instead. His interest in photography suggests self-identity is something constructed from the view of others. Creative framing resembling Instagram posts establishes an alienating social dynamic of spectator and poster. It invites the viewer into Jake’s life, as it separates from what he shares online. 

In the film, Jake must also confront the role sexuality plays in his social life. At the climax of the movie, Jake has his first queer experience, leaving the viewer to wonder if this is the first moment of honesty to his suppressed desires. When social media outs Jake to the whole school, love becomes a buoy in gossipy waters and something to float Jake through expectations he drowns in. At the end of the movie, Jake’s efforts to conquer shame pay off, as he becomes someone he is proud of. 

Across time, these movies transmit the struggles of love as amorphous processes beyond queer-exclusive acceptance narratives. How others perceive someone is not always the truest iteration of their identity. Both of these films show how this uncomfortable speculation evolves into a satisfying ending once people can articulate their desires. These films centre on queer relationships, but never treat queerness as the ultimate end of their characters. After all, who you love is only part of why.

Monday Music: Sapphic love songs

0
PHOTO: Karolina Grabowska / Pexels

By: Abigail Streifel, Peak Associate

“Headaches” by Raveena

“Headaches” is soft, dreamy, and “unapologetically queer.” Raveena tells a story of unexpected starting out mellow, leading into an instrumental break and a more upbeat outro. As a bonus, the music video — starring Raveena and Hitomi Mochizuki as the artist’s love interest — is visually beautiful.

“Sugar in the Tank” by Julien Baker and TORRES

A heartfelt song from a country duo composed of two queer artists, Julien Baker and TORRES. Their vivid lyrics describe how people are motivated to overcome both mundane and extreme challenges when they care about someone. The two singers’ voices, along with a guitar, blend together seamlessly in the chorus.

“Sweet” by Syd

R&B artist Syd’s “Sweet” captures the feeling of wanting to do things right in a new relationship. In a catchy chorus, the narrator promises, “don’t need jewelry, don’t need money, don’t need nothin’, babe / Nothin’ but sweet, sweet, sweet lovin’, babe.” The song moves at a leisurely pace, yet conveys a determination to take a relationship seriously.

“Dog Rose” by Arlo Parks

This song perfectly illustrates the conflict between expressing genuine feelings and not wanting to come on too strong. Singer-songwriter Arlo Parks juxtaposes these desires in her lyrics, “I hope it’s not a big deal / You got me feeling hyperreal” — torn between anxiety and expressing her love. Parks’ gentle vocals make this song feel warm and comfortable despite that struggle.

“WYKYK” by Molly Grace

“WYKYK” (that is, “when you know, you know”) is an upbeat pop song about the thrilling feeling of falling in love. Molly Grace, who is “inspired by burlesque, disco, and old Hollywood,” explores love at first sight over an exciting beat. It’s dramatic and intense, but sometimes you’re just sure you’re meant to be with someone.

Naruse Mikio film series takes place in Vancouver

0
IMAGE: Courtesy of Toho

By: Jonah Lazar, Staff Writer

A selection of works by one of Japan’s great masters of the silver screen has returned to Vancouver for the first time in 20 years

Naruse Mikio is an influential director who pioneered Japanese film during the mid-century. He captures audiences with a subtle, solemn, and achingly human depiction of women’s lives following World War II. Despite limited international success (in comparison with other Japanese directors), Mikio is enjoying a posthumous international surge in popularity. Following what would have been his 120th birthday last year, New York’s Japan Society has been collaborating with the Japan Foundation and cinemas across North America to display the director’s films. 

Vancouver’s Cinematheque, which has been a mainstay of Howe Street for over half a century, is one of these many cinemas in collaboration with the Japan Society. This series will conclude on February 21 with a screening of Scattered Clouds, Mikio’s final work released just months before he passed away. 

On January 25, I attended a screening of Late Chrysanthemums at the Cinematheque along with a few dozen other cinephiles who braved the cold. Late Chrysanthemums follows a handful of former geishas combatting the loneliness of aging by clinging on to their children, past lovers, and memories of their former selves, all the while navigating the turbulent, westernizing postwar Japan.

Through the lens of this loneliness, Mikio highlights the patriarchal nature of the problems which these women face — with all of them unmarried, they scramble to find a foothold to maintain their worth in a changing society which no longer values them for their beauty. Nothing makes this more evident than one of the last scenes of the film, where one of these former geishas tries (and fails) to imitate a younger woman doing the Monroe walk, which serves to highlight how the shift towards western beauty standards has left these women feeling like relics of a lost time. 

Late Chrysanthemums is a captivating portrait of weariness, nostalgia, and solitude. 

This series is coming to an end soon, but if you still wish to attend, keep your eyes peeled for a couple screenings of When a Woman Ascends the Stairs, one of Mikio’s most critically acclaimed films, which will be shown on February 13 and 15 at the Cinematheque. Another one to look out for is A Wanderer’s Notebook, a film based on the life of the feminist writer and poet, Hayashi Fumiko, on February 20. 

Screenings of Mikio’s works will continue until February 21 at the Cinematheque. 

The bro of my dreams

0
IMAGE: Ashley Webb / Flickr EDIT: Mason Mattu / The Peak

By: Katie Walkley, Peak Associate

The Peak is proud to publish this beautiful love song that absolutely rivals the likes of Lana Del Rey, Paul Anka, and whoever sang “Take Me Home Country Roads.” Enjoy. 

We met on Hinge,

I wanted to take it slow.

But now I can’t end a sentence,

Without calling him bro.

When things get romantic,

I cannot hold back.

I get controlled by my antics,

Friendzone in full attack. 

I don’t mean bro as in brother,

I mean bro as in lover.

It’s a term for people

who appreciate each other.

It wasn’t my fault.

Before I called him bro, he called me man.

He opened up the bro-vault —

I think I need a new plan . . .

Honey? Dearest? Sweet huzz of my life?

No, that’s disgusting

This is bringing me too much strife!

I don’t mean bro as in brother,

I mean bro as in lover.

It’s a term for people

who appreciate each other.

Once I’ve called someone bro,

I just cannot stop.

It’s a level of deep shared intimacy,

Beyond that of tying the knot.

Maybe I’ll call him dude instead,

So it feels less incestuous.

But then our relationship,

Would be so disingenuous!!!

Bro, is bro all I know?

“Will you take this baddie to be your lawfully wedded bro?”

“I do, I do!” is all I can proclaim,

“I will only know you as bro and by no other name!”

I don’t mean bro as in brother

I mean bro as in lover

It’s a term for people

Who appreciate each other

Outro (phone call audio):
“But seriously Katie, can you stop calling me bro? I want to be more than your bro.”

“But there is nothing more than a bro!”

 

static ambience and fade to silence 

 

Peak positions: Sex tips from your student paper

0
ILLUSTRATION: Sonya Janeshewski / The Peak

By: Your Bedsheets

Tired of the same boring old stuff in the bedroom? Hoping to spice things up? Look no further. Here are The Peak’s top horizontal tango positions:

The McFogg

You’ve probably heard of doggy style. This one’s similar, but with a slight Scottish twist. One partner dons a tam o’ shanter, while the other plays Highland Cathedral on the bagpipes. This will have you finishing faster than Scotland’s EU exit, without leaving 73% of citizens dissatisfied.

SFU’s independent newspaper since 1969

What do those lips do? Read out loud. That’s what. If you thought anything else, please go ahead and get your head out of the gutter. For this one, you’ll want to go ahead and grab a couple copies of The Peak from your local newsstand. For those tuning in from off campus, any newspaper will do. Partners will assume the 69 position and take turns reading each other riveting articles from the most sensual newspaper west of the prairies. If intellectual stimulation isn’t your thing, maybe sit this one out.

The Raccuck

Don’t think we forgot about all you voyeurs out there. With the flaunter’s consent, grab your favourite trash can snack item, climb into your ideal viewing position, and enjoy the show. We know you’ll be rubbing those little paws together, you promiscuous nocturnal onlooker.

The Gondola

Let’s face it, the university is not building a lift up the mountain anytime soon. In the meantime, you’ll have to ride something else. For this position, you’ll want to grab a piggyback ride from a partner. Make sure you’re holding on tight, and with a free hand/foot/other extremity, go ahead and crank that motor. Note — only those with expert balance should attempt to operate multiple cable cars at once. The Peak does not assume responsibility for any injuries occurring as a result of poor steering.

The Sticky Red Leaf

What’s sticky, comes out of a small hole, and might even taste a little sweet? Maple syrup, obviously. This one is pretty straight forward — go ahead and lather some of that liquid gold on your partners’ preferred areas and start sucking! Mmm . . . delicious. 

The SFU administration

Well, not much to say here. You know you’re already getting fucked by them anyway.

 

CUPE Local 15 alleges Vancouver bargained in bad faith

0
The Vancouver City Hall building is pictured on a bright, sunny day surrounded by trees and street lamps.
PHOTO: Thomas Roessler / Wikimedia Commons

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer

A local union is alleging that the City of Vancouver did not bargain in good faith during agreements that were settled in August of last year. Instead, they claim, “the City violated the Labour Relations Code by

“Intentionally withholding important information about its plans to implement far-reaching workforce reductions until after bargaining had concluded and the collective agreement had been ratified.”

— Santino Scardillo, CUPE Local 15 acting president

CUPE Local 15, which represents more than 4,000 employees with the City, Park Board, and community centres,” believes that Vancouver was aware of the possibility of upcoming layoffs “as early as June 2025.” 

This summer, mayor Ken Sim called for a 0% property tax increase, despite notes from city staff that a 7% hike “would be required to maintain existing services.” To avoid the hike, Sim and ABC Vancouver instructed “city staff to find $120 million in savings or new revenues.” At the beginning of November, a leaked memo sent before the City’s release of the 2026 draft budget indicated that these savings “will mean slashing 400 city jobs,” about 270 of which were CUPE Local 15 positions. This is the information that the union alleges the City withheld.

This discrepancy comes after a change requiring unionized city employees to return to working in-office for at least three days per week, a move some considered a “backdoor method” of getting employees to quit.

CUPE Local 15 hopes to renegotiate the collective agreement based on the details omitted, or ensure the City “will not be allowed to move forward with the workforce reductions that were a result of the bad-faith conduct during the term of this collective agreement.” While the Labour Relations Board could possibly invalidate the agreement outright, the director of SFU’s labour studies program, Kendra Strauss, told the Vancouver Sun that such an outcome is unlikely. The Peak reached out to CUPE Local 15 for comment, but did not hear back by the publication deadline.

“The City has received the union’s application [to negotiate] and has retained legal counsel,” Vancouver media relations told The Peak. “The City is in the process of reviewing and responding to the application. We value our partnerships with all our unions and continue to engage with CUPE 15 in ongoing discussions pursuant to Section 54 of the BC Labour Relations Code.” 

Section 54 states that “if an employer introduces or intends to introduce a measure, policy, practice, or change” that impacts employment conditions for “a significant number of employees to whom a collective agreement applies,” then “the employer must give notice to the trade union that is party to the collective agreement at least 60 days before the date on which the measure, policy, practice, or change is to be effected.” Additionally, “after notice has been given, the employer and trade union must meet, in good faith, and endeavour to develop an adjustment plan.”

For now, the union will have to wait to see if the Labour Relations Board finds the City in violation of the code.