Home Blog Page 1361

Entrepreneurs integrate education and social media

1

By Graham Cook

Students from SFU and FIC create StutorPlus, a project that aggregates social media content to answer academic questions

A group of three students from SFU and Fraser International College are putting together a website that aims to make social media addiction into something more productive. FIC student Krishna Krishna, SFU accounting student Flora Yang, and SFU economics student Harmanjeet Singh are working on creating StutorPlus, an online network based on the platform of knowledge.

This website was originally the brainchild of group leader Krishna, with Singh and Yang joining in once he presented them with the idea. While speaking with The Peak about the project, Krishna said that he plans to include functions like online classes and the ability to request help with confusing academic material. However, unlike services like Yahoo! Answers, those answering the questions will have to prove that they are a university student or instructor, most likely by supplying a student ID number during registration. For example, if an SFU student wants to answer a question another user has posted, they must provide proof that they are in fact a student for their profile to reflect that expertise. Krishna says he believes that this will lead to more trustworthy and accurate information than is found elsewhere on the Internet.

Krishna also stated that the trio has invested approximately $2,000 of their own money into the project to date. He said that they will have to raise another $20,000 in order to get the website up and running. Krishna concluded by stating that neither he nor the site will, at least initially, focus on profit, but rather on the educational experience of the user. He did hint that, much like Youtube partnerships, they would like to one day add a feature that rewards users for their services in teaching classes or providing content.

Engineering student mentors space settlement design competitors

0

By Graham Cook

Bhupinder Rathore will accompany 10 high school students to Houston, Texas, to compete in the 18th annual Space Settlement Competition

Simon Fraser University undergrad Bhupinder Rathore is mentoring a group of Surrey high-school students while they create a plan for a city in space. Rathore, a computer engineering student, plans to once again lead his pupils into the 18th annual International Space Settlement Competition, funded by Boeing and NASA.
Rathore spoke with The Peak about the competition, stating that he is “helping them create a proposal for . . . a city in space. We are supposed to provide for everything: food, water, recreation, the dimensions, the material we are going to construct it with, the schedule, the cost . . . the mode of transportation, and the power.” The contest, which includes high school students from around the world, began with an online submission that is sent to the event organizers.
From there, the best submissions were chosen and 12 teams received an invitation to attend the final round in late July at the Lyndon B. Johnston Space Centre, located in Houston, Texas. These top 12 groups are divided into teams, which often span multiple countries, and have 41 hours to work together to create a new proposal. This time, the information from their previous proposal on the internet is no longer allowed to be used. The teams instead utilize their mentor, NASA’s library, and supporting astronauts and engineers. Rathore’s group will be working with teams from Colorado, Pakistan, and Australia.
He stated that this provided one of the most prevalent challenges last year, as there are cultural and language barriers to overcome. One problem that he said could arise with this year’s pairing is a possible lack of co-operation between the Pakistanis and the Americans.
Rathore said that he was drawn to this work, as he “was always into space.” He added, “last year one of the high school students who was my friend told me that there is a high school competition and that they wanted to do it, but they did not have anyone to guide them.” The student knew that Rathore had an interest in space and requested that he be their mentor. Rathore then made a small presentation to the high school’s administrators, who were in favour of the idea.
According to Rathore, one of the most interesting things about the competition is that it spans multiple fields other than physics and engineering, such as biology and business. He stated that it “gives [the students] a demo of actual engineering. . . . You have a project, a deadline, and a CEO yelling at you.” He added that “last year it was the first Canadian team to make it to finals, this year it’s the second Canadian team to make it to finals. . . . we didn’t win last year . . . hopefully we’ll win this year.”

SFU documentary takes off

0

By Alison Roach

SFU student Matthew Cimone tracks the launch of the last space shuttle

SFU Residence Life coordinator Matthew Cimone has been watching the skies since his childhood, when he would go up to his grandfather’s cabin in Northern Ontario, and he’s been fascinated ever since. When he learned that the Kennedy Space Centre shuttle program was being discontinued after a final flight of the Atlantis space shuttle, he decided that he would be a part of it.

“I wanted to make sure I was there for the last launch,” Cimone told The Peak. Luckily for those of us not in the crowd of nearly one million that day, he took a film crew with him. The end result is the documentary Chasing Atlantis, which explores Cimone’s personal journey to the historic last launch as well as the shutting down of the space exploration program.

Cimone described it as a road trip movie, driven by a simple idea: “We thought we would bring a camera, and see what happens.” After first coming up with the concept, Cimone contacted his friend Paul Muzzin of Riptide Studios, who happily agreed to film the entirely self-funded project. “It was all credit cards,” said Cimone with a laugh.

After emailing several individuals the crew wished to speak with for the film, he was overwhelmed with the response. “It was what I expected and a lot more. I never thought we would get responses from NASA and the Canadian Space Agency,” said Cimone.

The film includes interviews with Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield, former director of the Kennedy Space Centre Jim Kennedy, several former NASA engineers, and residents of the community of Titusville, who will be affected by the shutdown of the program. “People had amazing stories of their time on the shuttles and near disasters that they had to share,” Cimone explained. The crew even gained access into NASA’s vehicle assembly building, where they witnessed three of the shuttles being prepared for retirement.

The crew also managed to get an interview with actor Will Wheaton, who played Wesley Crusher on Star Trek: The Next Generation.

“The interesting thing is there weren’t many people listening. A lot of people weren’t telling the story,” recalled Cimone. He was hoping to encounter more film crews and interviewers during the course of the filming, but was disappointed.

What concerns Cimone is the uncertain future of space travel following the discontinuation of the program. Cimone anticipates the rise of a private industry in the field and the possibility of space tourism developing in the coming years. However, in terms of exploration there is little planned for the future.

The film itself will be a 90-minute documentary that Cimone hopes to complete in October of this year, in time to be entered into the film festival circuit.

For now, a 20-minute preview has been screened at Polaris in Toronto, and Cimone hopes to show the film back home at SFU as well. In the coming weeks, Cimone plans on putting up the clip on Kickstarter, a social media funding network which he hopes will help him pay back some of that credit card debt.

Cimone describes the entire experience as one of high energy and high emotions. “It was a huge geek fest. I felt like a child all over again.”

Art by the masses, for the masses

0

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Photos courtesy of EMI

Masterminds behind Bill You Murray Me back with a Spice Girls-themed art show

A group of friends, drinking cocktails, and making art: casual night in, or the beginnings of a series of themed art shows? For Christina Chant and the other members of the Quick and Dirty Collective, it was both. The premise of their art shows is that they are a group effort: anybody can submit an art piece, as long as it fits the theme of the chosen celebrity. The first show, “Steven Seagallery”, had the theme of — you guessed it — Steven Seagal. Chant says the initial idea for the Steven Seagallery was a friend of hers’ and that, after several nights of collective art, it became clear that a show of that sort would not be too difficult to put together.

In October 2011, with her friend’s blessing, Chant and several of her colleagues put together the Steven Seagallery. “It got people that don’t typically make art to make art,” says Chant of the show’s success. That and the high turnout convinced the organizers to do another show: this time, the theme was Bill Murray. Bill You Murray Me?! took place in February and March of this year, and had even more success than its predecessor.

“After the last show, we were pumped on the results,” says Chant, which brings us to last Saturday’s show: Zig-a-zigallery, a Spice Girls-inspired art show. The show took place at The Fall and, as per its theme, all the art represented the Spice Girls in one way or another. The mediums varied from drawings to installations to videos to paintings — the only possible reason a piece would get rejected is if it had nothing to do with the theme; everything else has the green light.

The art show was true to Spice Girls form: lots of music and colors, with a surprise performance by the Spice Boys. The atmosphere had a casual, just-for-fun vibe, where all mediums, ideas, and skill levels are welcomed with open arms — much like the approach the organizers themselves take to their shows. “It’s meant to be fun, and meant to lower barriers”, says Chant. “I have a day job. If [putting together the shows] wasn’t fun, I wouldn’t do it.” Unfortunately, the fact that it’s not for profit and only a fun project means that the organizers don’t have time to expand the project as much as they would like.  “Ideally, we would be able to have a website, with links to artists that have contributed,” continues Chant. “If there’s time, we’ll do it, but it’s on the backburner for now.”

The upcoming show has a theme that’s just as fun as the last few: Snoop Dogg. So, what do Steven Seagal, Bill Murray, the Spice Girls, and Snoop Dogg all have in common that got them chosen as themes? Celebrity subjects are picked based on being nostalgic, easy to poke fun of, well-loved, and something that people will want to come see, says Chant. “If people respond, it’s kind of a deciding factor,” she explains. “It’s what the public wants, man.”

The Snoop Dogg show is set to take place in November, with a punny title still in the brainstorming process.

These shows are meant to be fun, and they are meant to be about collaboration and art, uninhibited by skill or fear of judgment. Admission into all their shows is by donation, and the art pieces are for sale, with all the proceeds going directly to the artist themselves. The shows are about inclusion, and about community. So, contribute to the next show — even if it’s a stick drawing of Snoop Dogg. Or just get dressed up, come down, have a drink, and support local artists.

Coaching project gives a voice to DTES writers

0

By Monica Miller
Photo by J. Paxon Reyes (Flickr)

Organized by members of SFU Continuing Studies, the project’s mentors give students individual attention over three months 

Addiction, transphobia, and oppression were just some of the heavy-hitting topics of the script readings at GritLit, which took place on July 5 at the Rhizome Cafe. Over 30 people attended these readings, which were the outcome of a new writing program aimed at writers living in the DTES.

This is the DTES Manuscript Coaching Project, the brainchild of Betsy Warland and Katherine McManus, the writing and communications program director for SFU Continuing Studies.

Warland, the founding director of the SFU Writers’ Studio, had approached Joan Flood, a previous volunteer with Thursdays Writing Collective at the Rhizome, to coordinate the project.

“I was absolutely thrilled to be a part of it,” says Flood, who was surprised by how many writing groups are in the DTES. Many of these writers have already had experience with sending out submissions to magazines, and been published in anthologies, but needed one final push to create a full manuscript.

“[What has always impressed me] was all these writing groups that met weekly without fail, the sheer number of groups in the neighbourhood, and that the people running them are all volunteers,” says Flood, who says that perhaps the circumstances of our lives are unimportant, and what does matter need to express ourselves. “It’s what makes us human.”

Fiona Tinwei Lam, one of the project’s mentors, has heard firsthand the kind of dedication her students have to writing. “Even when they were homeless, they would write — on napkins, scraps of paper, anything — to communicate to themselves and understand their own self.”

Lam, along with two other mentors, came together to discuss six potential students from a pool of about 15 manuscripts. “We looked for pieces that touched us or that we could offer something to,” explains Charles Demers, an SFU alumnus, comedian, and author of Vancouver Special.

Each coach selected two writers and spent three months working together. Each pairing had nine one-on-one meetings and set individual goals from the collaboration. Demers knew his two pupils wouldn’t be able to put together a full book-length manuscript in three months, but it would be enough to put together the skeleton for one.

“It sounds awkward to say ‘student’ and ‘teacher,’ and even ‘coach’ seems too strong,” reflects Demers. “What we really did was editing and advising, offering an outside perspective to a solitary endeavor.”

Working on this project has even helped the coaches, Demers says. “It has helped reinforce the fundamentals, and reminded me of this exciting phase. It’s an inspiring place to be, with a lot of creative energy.”

The future of the program is up in the air at the moment, as funding for a 2013 edition has yet to be confirmed. Flood says they want to be able to offer the program to more people, but its intensive nature limits the number of students that each coach should take on.

Wayde Compton, the director of SFU’s Writer’s Studio, hits the nail on the head. “So often people talk about the neighbourhood. So it is important that we have people speaking from the DTES, that these voices get heard.”

Pills, Pills, Pills: The Growing Concern Around “Study Drugs”

0

By Shannon Palus

“I hate that people take ADHD medications to study,” says Katie Ellston*, halfway through our first round of raspberry blondes on a late summer’s day.

She begins telling me about a side of so-called “study drugs” that I had never quite stopped to consider. “I’d give a million dollars not to have to pop a pill every day,” she says.

The tale of the student who takes ADD/ADHD medication sans prescription is, to the modern day university student, a familiar one. Alex* finds that these meds improve concentration and keep you up all night, something that is often necessary in the over-extended schedule of a student. Alex buys the medication from a friend whose ADHD prescription provides them with more pills than they need. Alex has a few sweaty, red-eyed nights, but has plans to work at Goldman Sachs and live in a nice flat downtown.

This phenomenon is so common that even students who don’t abuse prescription drugs are likely to know where to get them. An editorial last year in the Canadian Medical Association Journal published that an estimated five to 35 per cent of students abuse prescription stimulants. The editorial is titled “Time to address stimulant abuse on our campuses,” and calls for the de-normalization of their use.

But Ellston is not like Alex. During the school year, she takes a pill every day. She’s had a prescription for Concerta — Ritalin’s long-acting cousin — since she was diagnosed with ADHD at 15. “It’s a hardcore drug,” she says – something she feels that people who take the drug recreationally don’t understand. When she goes across the border to the U.S., for example, she can only take one pill for every day she is traveling, and she must carry a doctor’s note. Furthermore, she feels that casual prescription drug use trivializes her illness, something that is part of her everyday life.

Concerta, like other medications commonly used to treat ADD/ADHD, is a stimulant, meaning it increases the amount of dopamine in the user’s brain. With Concerta, Ellston experiences many of the physiological aspects of an addiction. On days when she does not take her medication, she experiences headaches, nausea, and slight depression, much like a cocaine user coming off a high or a coffee addict running too late for work to pop by Starbucks. Furthermore, if she takes it later than 10 a.m., she cannot fall asleep later that night. During the summer, Ellston chooses to go off Concerta, and she has up to a week of nausea and depression — a detox that she calls “hell”.

Concerta produces similar effects in people with ADD/ADHD as it does for people without, though the improvement in concentration is more dramatic for people who have clinically diagnosable difficulties with concentrating. Scientists aren’t exactly sure how it works: literature is littered with the words “might” and “probably.” The thinking goes that upping the amount of dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain — which ADD/ADHD medication does — improves concentration. People with ADD/ADHD may naturally have less of these neurotransmitters, the conventional wisdom goes, which is probably why taking Concerta can bring them up to the level of concentration that most people experience without the help of drugs.

To some degree, most stimulants have the effect of improving concentration. Robert Franck, the Clinical Director of McGill Mental Health Service, says that he’s had patients that turned out to be ADD/ADHD, that have been self-medicating by excessively drinking coffee. Like Ellston, he doesn’t like the fact that students  casually take medication without a prescription. Though the drugs are relatively safe, they come with a suite of risks and side effects, and their use should be carefully monitored by a health professional — one who knows what other drugs you’re on, too.

Hypertension, arrhythmias, and psychotic episodes are the more extreme effects of ADD/ADHD medication. The CMAJ editorial rattles these off, and adds that, though rare, overdoses are “potentially lethal.” These are all true and valid reasons not to abuse ADD/ADHD medication, explains Franck. “But scare tactics don’t really work,” he says.

It’s not just potential physical harm that concerns him; Franck explains that taking drugs as a band-aid solution to things like school anxiety is potentially done to mask clinical anxiety or depression. Franck’s motto is, “medication when necessary, but not necessarily medication.”

When Ellston was diagnosed with ADHD, the medication was the last step of her treatment plan, and remains just one part of her regimen. In addition to taking the drug, Ellston sees a therapist every week. Through the Office for Students with Disabilities, she’s allowed four hours instead of three to complete exams, as well as a short break to walk around during an exam. She also gets to bring in a “fidgeter” — a small object that she can play with.

She also has to know her own study habits incredibly well: she doesn’t work on any one assignment for more than half an hour at a time. “The information won’t stick if I try and make myself,” she says. She describes the feeling of having ADHD as having 100 different thoughts going on in your head at once, popping around and soaring off on their own little orbits. “When I’m on the drugs, instead of 100 thoughts, I only have 50. And when one tries to go off on a tangent,” she says, moving her hand away from her head. “I can feel it being pulled back. It’s like it hits a wall.” It’s not that she’s not herself on the drug; it’s just that her thoughts behave in a different manner. “Being on the drugs is like running down a hallway, and not being on them is like running through a field.”

The fact that these are prescription drugs with a medical use hadn’t quite settled in my mind before. Perhaps it’s because of stories that have been popping up in the media, each taking the tack that study drug abuse, like hooking up, smoking pot, or using the internet, is a new trend hitting the continent’s youth; perhaps it’s because the high school I went to was filled with overachievers who went on to universities that boasted as much of a problem with ADD/ADHD medication abuse as they did with any other drug. Though I’ve never taken Ritalin or Concerta, it’s never occurred to me that I should have any qualms about doing so; not even the basic concerns that come with smoking pot now and then. It’s not even treated like a recreational drug in the crowd I run with. It’s not done for fun — it’s done to achieve.

It seems I’m not alone. Alan Desantis at the University of Kentucky has spent the past handful of years facilitating interviews with hundreds of students. He found that, for some, taking the medication sans prescription was less of a concern than drinking beer or smoking cigarettes. In his research he found that students use a number of arguments to justify their lax use of the medication: that they only take it during finals, that they are self-medicating for concentration problems, and what Desantis referred to as the “I’m-doing-it-for-the-right-reasons” argument.

“No, they’re definitely a drug!” says George Bellwood*, a McGill student who took un-prescribed Concerta several times last year. “Yes, eight, I think,” he says, counting on his fingers. “I’m thinking about this in terms of the number of major assignments.”

For Bellwood, the study drugs are a tool for long nights of working that comes free of health or moral concerns — scare tactics referencing potential death do not work on him.

Concerta allows Bellwood to work overnight. He’ll drink two or three cups of coffee in the evening, settle into the arts computer lab, and get to work on a paper. Around two a.m., when the coffee stops being enough, he’ll pop a pill. “It’s like licking iron,” he says of the metallic taste of Concerta. Soon after, he’ll feel jittery, sweaty, but then his mind will clear, he explains. And then he’ll work.

“You don’t lose track of time. You’re really aware of the next step,” he explains dispelling my notion that these drugs offer a sort of trance. “And you don’t want to be doing the work. You just are.”

He’ll continue in that robotic haze, one task, and then the next, and then the next. By four a.m., there are only two or three other students left, at least one of them asleep. “It’s so fucking bleak in that room, with those fluorescent lights.” The janitor comes in at seven, signaling that the rest of the world has moved on to the next day.

Bellwood’s normal facial expression is a sort of Cheshire-cat grin, which makes him seem at once eager and carefree. He talks about history — citing paradigms and scholars — the way other people talk about TV shows. He plans on going to grad school when he’s done at McGill: last semester, he got a 4.0 GPA, started a journal, edited a section of a campus newspaper, had a part-time job, and, though he insists his social life was cut by half, he still went out every Saturday.

In awe, I ask him how he does it all. “The drugs!” he exclaims, throwing his hands in the air — what had I thought I was interviewing him about?

The drugs are a prop he hopes to cast aside once he’s finished hopping along the stepping stones to a successful future — perhaps in grad school, perhaps working an entry level position. He’s not sure when, he just knows that there will be a time in the future when the work will pay off, a spot in life where the things on his to-do list can be accomplished without him breaking out into a chemically induced sweat, and with room left over for seven hours of sleep and a substantial social life.

Sitting in Franck’s office, I outline Bellwood’s reasoning: wanting grades and extracurricular to be a tangible currency that he can exchange for a job after graduation, and knowing meds can make him do more and do better. Shouldn’t we take a leg up in the world when we can? “I would say to those people: why do you feel you have to study so hard?” Franck says. Wanting to get ahead in life does not necessitate medication — you can be organized and reasonable about what you take on, he reasons. But it’s not just that: Franck thinks doing drugs to wend one’s way through undergrad amounts to cheating yourself out of the things that you actually enjoy in life: whether coding, reading, or playing soccer, these are activities at which you might end up being successful, and which you enjoy.

“That, that is the kind of attitude that I fucking hate,” exclaims Bellwood, when I bring up Franck’s argument. “It’s actually really harmful, that kind of faux naivete: ‘why are you studying so hard?’ Theoretically, this is the point of attending a university.”

This brings up a much larger reality: that university is a dream world of sorts, a strange pocket of society filled with bright people, 24-hour study facilities, 24-hour coffee shops, and an endless tunnel of hoops to jump through. We’re judged by our peers, by the numbers that stare back at us from our transcripts, by the test score requirements on grad school information pamphlets. Perhaps most importantly, for Bellwood and for many of us, we’re here for genuine reasons: because we love academia, because we want to be happy and prosperous. Doing well in academia can bring us those things, and drinking coffee and popping pills can bring us success in academia. It seems like such a simple transaction.

But to Franck and other outside observers, it appears that you have to learn to live within the constraints of the real world. “University is a wonderful opportunity to develop understanding,” explains Franck. “Not just academic, but how to feel good about yourself, how to manage time and to develop coping strategies.” By popping study drugs, Franck believes you set yourself up in a lifestyle that is unsustainable and potentially soul-sucking, one that’s not based on doing the things that make you happy, but on the things that you feel others want out of you. Still, he sympathizes with the plight of the George Bellwoods of the world. That’s why he thinks people like him need to work harder to educate students about the perils of study drugs, and about ways to cope without the drugs.

Ellston, who’s studying high school education, agrees with Franck. When on field experience she’ll often have an ADHD child or two in her classroom, and she feels she can effectively teach these kids in a way that teachers without ADHD can’t. “They’ll do things like stand up in the middle of class and start walking around, and their teacher will say, ‘no, no, sit down,’” she explains. Instead of becoming frustrated and disciplining them, or singling them out, Ellston can empathize: “I’ll talk to them about it, and say, ‘if you need to stand up during class, stand up. I need to do that too sometimes.’”

Right or wrong, excusable or not, the fact remains that some people, like Ellston and the kids she works with, need ADHD medication, while others — Bellwood being one — use them for other purposes. It has become part of many university cultures, but has also grown to be a public concern.

 

*Names have been changed.

The Daily Snooze: Paper Boy

0

Possible election fraud holds grave implications for Canada

0

 

By Benedict Reiners
Photos by Remy Steinegger

The first-past-the-post-system, which Canada uses in its federal elections, has been referred to as an “elected dictatorship.” This term reflects a system that operates off of the premise that the election winner more or less gets to do whatever they want to push forward their agenda. But what happens when someone isn’t really elected, and still gets to help form this elected dictatorship?

The Supreme Court is looking into this very question right now, as it reviews a case of potential election fraud in Ontario. This fraud is alleged to have taken place in the Toronto riding of Etobicoke Centre, now held by Conservative MP, Ted Opitz, after he won the previous election by a total of 26 votes. The controversy centers on 79 voters that were found to have cast a vote without providing evidence that they were permitted to do so. An Ontario court has already deemed that these charges are sufficient to throw out the election results.

Regardless of one’s preferred party, it is easy to see that if the ruling overturns the results of the riding’s election, it will provide an easy target for opposition parties to attack. It is not only ethical that the Conservative Party does something to ensure that nothing like this happens again, but also in their strategic interest. It is for this reason that we can hope that the Conservatives, a party not exactly known for progressive stances on social or ethical issues, will actually act in this case. The party must send the message that change is happening, and although the best thing would be to provide additional legislation to prevent problems like this from occurring in the first place, even declaring that they won’t allow Mr. Opitz to run as their candidate would be a good start.

However, though only strategic reasons may convince the government to properly address this issue, others bear mentioning as well. Foremost amongst these are the implications that the upcoming Supreme Court ruling for our electoral system. If we do not root out these problems, we will be dealing with a much longer and far more enduring problem than 79 votes and a seat that is not needed to maintain a majority. This is as much about the political culture in our country as it is about Etobicoke Centre, if not more so, and the actions taken, both by the government and the Supreme Court, must reflect this. If they don’t, they will be creating a culture that could potentially remove voters from the elections process.

If the government is confident that their candidate actually won the riding, then they shouldn’t be afraid of a by-election. Yes, money is tight for both Canadians and the government right now, but elections are and always will be a good use of our money.  Maybe democracy has a cost, but it is a cost still worth paying. If this government wants to get tough on crime, they need only look as far as the election to prove it.

It’s time to pack in the cigarette pack warnings

0

 

By Jon Liedtke — The Lance (CUP)
Photos by Greg Hertz

Windsor (CUP) – The majority of us get it: cigarette smoking isn’t good for you. In fact, it’s downright bad for you. Tobacco use can cause many diseases including heart attack, stroke, emphysema, and cancer. It increases the risk of Crohn’s disease and is the number one cause of bladder cancer.

According to the World Health Organization, roughly 100 million people have died from tobacco use over the course of the 20th century.

From grade school to the end of high school, the majority of educational institutions teach the ills of smoking, and how bad a choice it is to make.

The majority of anti-tobacco messaging, while well-intentioned, doesn’t seem to work. People still smoke at alarming rates. Anti-tobacco literature is placed in every store that sells tobacco, but people still use the products.

The most dramatic form of anti-tobacco literature is on cigarette packaging itself. Legislation from Ottawa last September now requires new labeling on cigarette packages, which covers 75 per cent of the package, and aims to “horrify smokers into not smoking.”

Indeed, with graphic pictures of a cancer-infected mouth or a 42-year-old woman dying of cancer, the images are horrifying. Considering we have a publicly funded health system, I can fiscally understand why the government would want to promote a tobacco-free lifestyle.

The merits of the program aside, many who don’t smoke are offended by the program as well. While cigarettes are hidden behind sealed displays at stores, anyone around a smoker sees these new ads.

Those who don’t even smoke are being levied the burden of being “horrified into not smoking.” They’ve already made the choice not to smoke, so why punish them as well?

Smoking tobacco is a deadly addiction that often claims those closest to us. Having lost family members to smoking, I stand by the government in actively attempting to discourage smoking.

However, I must distance myself from the government in their legislation of cigarette packages. The year is 2012, and we don’t have doctors prescribing cigarettes, or 1950s tobacco jingles devised by Madison Avenue advertisers.

It’s time for the government to treat citizens like educated adults. If the government is seeking to lower tobacco use, provide incentives. Conversely, they could increase taxes on tobacco.

Either way, something should be done that doesn’t limit the ability of a company to determine its packaging. Perhaps we can move as other countries have and simply ban any tobacco-related advertising — thus hiding it entirely from our society.

Ski Ninjas: Scrabble

0

By Kyle Lees at Ski Ninjas