Home Blog Page 1294

The sun rises on a new Bowie

0

By Max Hill

 

The Next Day is reminiscent of David Bowie’s golden days

The successful rock and roll comeback is a rare and serendipitous thing — after 10 years of absence from the music scene, and 20 years previous making middle-of-the-road art rock, many had considered Bowie’s career to be over, and had begun to consider his suc- cesses and failures in the past tense. That The Next Day exists at all, recorded in secret and announced only two months before its release, is astound- ing; that it manages to rise to the level of Bowie’s best work from the 70s is a revelation.

But this it accomplishes: The Next Day is dark, terse, and at times inaccessible, but it also features some of Bowie’s most challenging, creative and ulti- mately rewarding work, as well as some of his most infectious and involving. The David Bowie we hear on The Next Day has weathered the storm and has come out both stronger and stranger for the experience.

Still as chameleonic and charmingly contradictory as he’s always been, Bowie experi- ments with a wide variety of influences throughout the album’s 14 tracks: from the claustrophobic, Joy Division post-punk of album opener “The Next Day”, to the Smiths-inspired anti- war balladry of “I’d Rather Be High”, to the dancehall beat of “Dancing Out in Space”, Bowie gleefully dips his toes in a wide variety of genres and styles, and yet manages to make this musical collage into something dis- tinctly his own.

His vocals are just as varied: on tracks like “Where Are We Now?” and “Heat”, each of Bow- ie’s 66 years come through in his low, fragile warble, while the youthful chirp heard in “Valentine’s Day” and the sultry snarl of “The Stars (Are Out Tonight)” sound as though they could’ve been recorded during Bowie’s golden years.

The Next Day is not without its flaws, of course: the al- bum’s musical diversity robs it of the singularity and oneness that defined Ziggy Stardust and Low, and the album’s opening and closing sections under- whelm compared to its spectac- ular middle section.

However, the album has a certain quality that Bowie has never fully perfected until now. Whereas the greatness of albums like Ziggy Stardust and Station to Station come from Bowie’s remarkable talent for performance and character, and his Berlin period is most notable for Bowie’s openness and artistic honesty, The Next Day manages to balance Bowie’s dichotomized selves — the mask and the man behind it — better than any of his previous works.

This isn’t to say that the album relies too heavily on self- reflection: given the cover, which is identical to Bowie’s 1977 effort Heroes save for a large white box in the middle which obscures his face, it’s easy to see why many anticipated an album in which Bowie would try to summarize his career and find some form of closure. The Next Day isn’t the album we were expecting: it’s almost defiantly difficult to pin down, and like Bowie’s best work, it leaves its listeners confused, exhilarated, and intrigued.

So many “comebacks” find washed-up artists desperately trying to recycle the chemical formula which once made them great. On The Next Day, Bowie always has something new to say, and it comes through in the album’s charismatic performances and unwillingness to re-tread familiar ground. Whether Bowie will make an- other LP is difficult to say — though long-time collaborator and album producer Tony Visconti has hinted at studio dates later this year, nothing seems set in stone — but with The Next Day, Bowie has solidified his relevance for many years to come, and reassured his fans and casual listeners alike that his talent for reinvention and seemingly boundless creativity has not weakened with age.

Five double features from beyond the stars

0

Cosmic journeys through classic cinema

By Will Ross

Movies set in the wild black yonder of space are a rare thing. Good ones are even rarer. But the sci-fi sub-genre’s traditional association with grindhouse cin- emas and multi-part epic franchises makes marathons a rewarding prospect.

So here are five space opera pairings to satisfy anyone’s starry eyes. Some of them are franchise pairings, some are unrelated but fitting companion films, but whichever you watch, expect luscious visuals, cosmic sound- scapes, and oodles of bewon- dered faces.

1. Alien (1979) and Aliens (1986)
A space-mining crew bring a newly-discovered alien onto their ship. Soon it grows into a murder machine, and hunts and kills off the crew one by one. What makes Alien really scary (besides the extremely dark and moody atmosphere) is that the crew are far from the derring- do adventurers of space operas gone by; they’re little more than menial workers who have to im- provise to kill their hunter.

Aliens takes an almost-identical plot structure and punches it up with guns, a little girl to protect, and a hell of a lot more aliens. It’s still a gruelling ride, but a satisfying one, and its de- piction of marines in space has been copied by just about every military sci-fi ever since.

2. Star Wars (1977) and The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
This one’s a given, but watch- ing these back-to-back reaffirms both their amazing scope and emotional vice grip. Star Wars was a pastiche-terpiece extravaganza that at once felt gritty and lived-in (the Millennium Falcon really is a hunk of junk) and spiritual, and the good humour and surge of the editing still make it fly by like no other epic.

Though Empire dropped the original’s escalation of B-movie nobilities, it more than made up for it by asking harder ques- tions and drawing from an even deeper (and darker) reservoir of feelings and character drama. And the music is still the crown jewel of John Williams’s career. Find the original versions if you can; they’re floating around on the internet.

3. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Solaris (1972)
Still rightly hailed by critics as the greatest sci-fi film ever made,
2001’s tale of man’s journey from prehistoric apes to technology- dependent colonizers to — er, something else — is still as brac- ing as ever. HAL, the ship’s com- puter gone inexplicably homicidal, is a chilling villain, all the more so because he is more sym- pathetic than the flesh and blood protagonists, and Stanley Ku- brick’s groundbreaking special effects imagery still drops jaws.

Though Andrei Tarkovsky’s Solaris was billed as the Russian answer to 2001, Tarkovsky was unimpressed with its icey view of human nature, and his is much more concerned with metaphysical suffering. Pyschologist and widower Kris Kelvin investigates a space station whose scientists are being driven mad by visions of loved ones long deceased, ap- parently animated by the nearby planet Solaris — which then res- urrects his dead wife, to his great anguish.

4. Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
No prior experience necessary here: Star Trek had never been and would never again be so bold and intelligent as these two films. The Motion Picture’s lengthy docking sequences and tribulations over the mysteries of the universe and ever-humanizing technology owes a clearer debt to Kubrick than the original series, as it slowly unfolds a plot concerning an almost-ab- stract threat to Earth with self- conscious beauty. And for my money, Jerry Goldsmith’s score is the greatest in movie history.

Khan is a fleeter palate cleanser with plenty more pew- pew kapow. An aging, disillusioned Kirk and his crew are hunted by an old nemesis, and face a no-win scenario that ends in a heartbreaking loss. Nonethe- less, the ending is not depressing, but life-affirming, crystallized by a performance of enormous emo- tional depth and nuance by — get this — William Shatner.

5. Forbidden Planet (1956) and Duck Dodgers in the 24½th century (1953)
Forbidden Planet, the first major feature set entirely on another planet, is a sort of interstellar ver- sion of Shakespeare’s Tempest.

Twenty years after an expedition to planet Altair IV disappears, a United Planets cruiser visits to find only two survivors, Dr. Mor- bius and his attractive daughter Altaira. The crew’s suspicions of Dr. Morbius (and sexual tensions with Altaira) mount until the ex- pedition’s fate is explained in the nervy climax: a monstrous, com- puter-enabled (and accidental) physical manifestation of the doctor’s own id.

And the second feature is okay, Duck Dodgers is far from a “feature,” but besides exploding the psychology of the sci-fi hero just as thoroughly as Forbidden Planet, these seven minutes of Daffy Duck’s spacefaring alter ego are packed with as many laughs and ideas as you’re likely to see in anything. The backgrounds are as fresh and inventive now as they were in 1953, and its satire of cold war posturing and technological redundancy (e.g. Dodgers using a teleporter to go to the airport) is as smart and funny as cartoons get.

Peak Week – March 11, 2013

0

By Daryn Wright

Eats
Pay a visit to Mountain Equipment Co-op and grab some dehydrated food, which is the closest you’re going to get to space food. Bring it home, quickly assemble a cardboard space ship, bring some stuffed animals inside and play out your inner child’s dream of being an astronaut. It probably won’t taste very good, and your mouth will probably quickly start watering for a thick angus steak, but at least you’ll feel better about never going to space camp and studying drama instead of following your 10-year old self’s dream.

Beats
Spaced Out Bach by Joseph Paine (I and II) are records from the 60s that sounds like something that would be playing in a bar in A Clockwork Orange. These records are basically Bach on synthesizers, or what people in the 60s thought we’d be listening to in space. The album cover is enough to merit a listen: volume I features a man in a space suit, floating around with Earth behind him, and volume II depicts a bust of Bach wearing the powdered wig and wearing an astronaut’s helmet. It may be hard to track down, but if you can, you’re in for a treat.

Theats
This week, why not take a moment to look at the stars. I know it’s still winter, and you’re probably going to be a bit chilly outside in the evening, but bundle up with a woolen scarf, bring along a thermos of hot chocolate and a friend, and find a spot where you can star-gaze uninterrupted. Maybe wander into Stanley Park, or find a spot along the beach where you can get a good view of the night sky. This is particularly good if you live somewhere rural, or have a car to drive somewhere without city lights.

Elites
Starry Nights at SFU hosts free evening star parties and events, which are open to the public. During these nights, guests are shown various celestial objects visible to the naked eye, and are invited to use telescopes to view distant star clusters and nebulae. Occasionally, there
are also themed events, including lectures on astronomical advances and movie nights. These events generally occur once a month, and are tentatively scheduled on clear days. Email [email protected] for more information.

Treats
Instead of suggesting you go out and buy stick-on stars for the ceiling of your bedroom (which are pretty awesome), I’m going to suggest you spend a
few dollars on the double bill at the Cinematheque, titled Russian Space Opera and featuring showings of To the Stars By Hard Ways and First on the Moon. The first is about the Starship Pushkin, which finds an abandoned vessel in space full of decaying bodies of humanoids, and the second is an ironic doc, mixing real and staged archival footage to uncover how Russia beat America to the moon. Both To the Stars and First on the Moon are showing on March 11, and To the Stars will have a followup screening on March 12.

Clan wins final regular season game

0

WEB-m hockey-Vaikunthe banerjee

SFU rockets past the WolfPack heading into the playoffs

By Andrew Jow
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

Simon Fraser University and Thompson Rivers University are going to see a lot of each other over the coming week. The Clan’s regular season finale pitted them against the WolfPack on March 2 at Bill Copeland Arena. The two teams will also meet in the first round of the playoffs, so this game was key to gaining momen- tum heading into the postseason.

For the first time in a few weeks, Clan head coach Mark Coletta had a full compliment of players at his disposable.
The home team shot out of the gate, skating up and down the ice in continuous action for the first three-and-a-half minutes. The quick start resulted in a beautiful goal by Brenden Silvester as he corralled the loose puck off the side wall, skated into the slot and fired a Crosby-esque backhand over TRU goaltender Adrien Her- villard’s shoulder.

The Clan’s advantage in speed also led to their second goal when Ben Van Lare streaked down the left hand side and fed team MVP Christopher Hoe at the doorstep, and he made no mistake.

SFU’s feisty period carried over into the second. Joey Pavone brought SFU’s lead to three while on the penalty kill. The third-year center did all the work himself, stealing the puck in the TRU’s zone and driving hard to the net, even- tually tapping in his own rebound.

The three goal lead may have made SFU overconfident, be- cause TRU got their first of the night as they caught all five SFU players down low in the Wolf- Pack’s zone, resulting in a TRU two-on-zero where Alessio To- massetti finished off the tic-tac- toe passing play.

Thompson Rivers contin- ued their comeback late in the period, when Anthony Delong picked up a loose puck along the sidewall and rifled it past SFU netminder Evan Kurylo. SFU defenseman Mike Ball scored the biggest goal of the night 50 seconds later as his point shot found its way into the back of the net. Ball’s effort restored the two-goal lead and gave the home team the momentum heading into the third.

Although the momentum was on SFU’s side, Thompson Rivers got within one goal five minutes into the third. SFU got caught scrambling in their own zone and TRU defenseman Joshua Macdonald’s point shot was deflected in by Tomassetti. Nick Sandor responded by scor- ing SFU’s first power play goal in two games, a result of Mike Ball’s great end-to-end rush.

Coach Jim Camazzola could be heard yelling, “take the ice!” all night, and the defenseman heeded his message. The defense had been active all game, jump- ing in on offensive chances when able, causing mismatches in TRU’s defensive scheme. Silves- ter added his second of the night, sealing the Clan’s 6–4 victory.

Coming in with three straight losses and playing their first round playoff opponent, SFU needed to make a statement and they did just that. The Clan proved they were the bet- ter team, and the WolfPack will need to play three nearly perfect games to beat the Burnaby squad.

The first playoff round began Friday March 8 at Bill Copeland as Simon Fraser looked to finish off a strong season with a cham- pionship. The results will be in the next issue of The Peak.

Convicted star player pushes on

0

TRU hockey player will not be punished by the school after being convicted of assault in 2012

By Adam Williams

KAMLOOPS (CUP) — A conditional discharge — which includes one year of probation, a ban on drinking alcohol and entering bars, and $30,000 in restitution — will leave behind no criminal record. And Colten DeFrias will continue to play hockey for TRU.

It happened almost two years ago, Oct. 23, 2011, on Victoria Street in downtown Kamloops. DeFrias, who at the time played for the Kam- loops Storm of the Kootenay International Junior Hockey League, was out drinking with the team following a 6–0 home win against the Golden Rock- ets and became involved in an altercation with a man named Andrew Giddens.

DeFrias punched Giddens in the mouth, knocking out four teeth and fracturing his jaw.

He was convicted of assault causing bodily harm on Dec.
11, 2012 and was sentenced earlier this month. He will face no discipline from TRU, the athletics department, or the BCIHL.

All this raises the question — what sort of standards do we hold our student athletes to here at TRU? Should De- Frias have faced punishment from TRU or the WolfPack, or is this beyond the reach of the institution?

Regardless of whether he was a member or the WolfPack at the time, if we want our ath- letes to be seen as role mod- els for the community, should DeFrias be allowed to con- tinue playing hockey for TRU? “If this were to have oc- curred while Colten was a member of the WolfPack, we would have been more ac- tively involved in a reaction,” said WolfPack general man- ager Chris Hans. “This hap- pened prior to him even applying to TRU.”

DeFrias has 12 goals and 14 assists in 20 games played this season, he’s second in team scoring behind forward Ales- sio Tomassetti.

Hans says that DeFrias has not been a behavioural con- cern whatsoever in his time with the WolfPack, but he has been made aware, as the rest of his teammates have, that there will be zero tolerance should any inappropriate behaviour occur while he is a member of the WolfPack.
All TRU athletes adhere to a code of conduct, which specifies that, “Any member of a university team whose con- duct puts the reputation of the university, teammates, coaches or themselves in a compromis- ing position may be subject to disciplinary action.”

All things considered, al- lowing DeFrias to move on and continue playing hockey for TRU is probably the right call. Though he caused a sig- nificant injury to Giddens — who has undergone five root canals since and will now need implants fashioned from bone in his hip — at some point DeFrias has to be allowed to move on with his life.

He will pay for his actions with the consequences imple- mented by the court. Whether or not those sanctions were harsh enough is a debate that won’t be touched on here.

DeFrias knows now that he’ll get no more second chances from the WolfPack.

“Once the sentence was imposed, I told Colten we ex- pect him to abide by every last condition,” Hans said. “If we see otherwise, we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it, but we won’t be turning a blind eye.”

Hans believes DeFrias has learned his lesson and has done a lot of growing up since the incident, supporting the team’s and the institution’s decision not to pursue further action. DeFrias expressed his regret in court this January.
“I am sorry to Andrew for the injury I caused him and the trouble I caused to his family,” DeFrias said. “I will continue to grow and learn.”

SFU blows an engine

0

By Ljudmila Petrovic

 

A gray and foggy Terry Fox Field played host to the Arizona Lax- cats last weekend, marking the sixth game of the Clan’s season.
The visiting team over- whelmed SFU with a final victory of 14–12, despite a strong Clan comeback in the final three where they outscored their opponents 10–8.

“Arizona flat out outplayed us. They set the bar out of the gate and forced us to play catch- up all game,” says head coach Brent Hoskins of Arizona. “Full credit to them and Coach Felton for travelling up to Canada and beating us in the rain on a day where they clearly wanted the win more than we did.”

The opening quarter of the game strongly favoured Arizona with a 3–0 lead, with the first two points scored by Luke Strode, and a marker from Ben Brehne.

The Clan’s first point was by freshman Alex Bohl; however, the small victory was short lived as Arizona sophomore Zach Johnson singlehandedly scored three consecutive goals and brought the score up to 6–1 for the Laxcats. The first quarter wrapped up with another SFU goal by attackman Colton Dow.

The Clan got their heads back in the game for the start of the second quarter, with SFU’s Ward Spencer bringing the score back to a manageable 6–3, shortly to be 7–3 with a goal by Arizona freshman Theodore Wolter.

The Clan wasted little time in closing the gap to a 7–5, with contributions by Sam Clare and Andrew Branting. The Laxcats
got their claws out for the final push, ending the quarter with a
9–5 lead.

The third quarter began with another burst from the Clan, thanks to goals by Dow and Spencer. Dow got another quick goal for SFU following another Arizona point by Wil- liam Stanaback.

Thescore was resting at a cozy 10-8 for Arizona until Brehne and Johnson each scored a point, leaving the Lax- cats purring with a 12–8 lead at the close of the third quarter.

The final push saw goals from Arizona’s Johnson and Ecker, starting the last quar- ter with a six-point lead by the Laxcats. The Clan tried hard to catch up, with a goal by Dow sandwiched between two Clare points. Despite SFU’s noble ef- forts, they were unable to tame the Laxcats enough to win and the final horn ended the game with a 14–12 win for Arizona.

This game moved SFU to 4–2 on the year, with Arizona im- proving to 2–2 in their fourth game this season.

Leaving little time to deliberate on their defeat, the Clan was back on the road this past weekend to play three games in Colorado. On March 9, they played No. 1 Colorado State, with another game against Colorado the next day, and they finish the trip March 12 against Virginia Tech.

Twist in history suggests big year ahead for Clan softball

0

SFU loses to UBC for the first time in history on the softball pitch

By Mehdi Rahnama

The third of March 2013 will forever be a day of joy for the University of British Columbia’s softball program. It marks their first ever victory over the Clan in a competitive softball outing.

The Clan, on the other hand, will be able to look on some positives as well, taking a rather long-term approach to this out- of-conference outing. The team is continuing their development to reach past achievements and is still working on some key areas. This defeat was a loss to history more than anything else.

Certainly a classic in all athletic disciplines, the Thun- derbirds versus Clan games are more than just any other matchup. The Clan begin their conference games with a 4–9 record.

After impressing in a 4–2 win over the Sea Warriors, wrapping up their out-of-conference tour of Hawaii, the Clan seemed to be in good shape to continue their dominance over their arch rivals, the Thunderbirds.

Playing with only a few of their starters though, the Clan seemed out of luck. Offensively, “we just couldn’t get on track,” said Coach Mike Rennie. As it was the last test for the Clan be- fore their conference schedule begins, “it was a good opportu- nity to get some people some playing time.”

As the team prepares for another finish at the top, it is possible to argue that, based on statistics; they have a good chance this year.
It comes down to the coach’s record — he has guided the team to four national titles, three of them in the past 10 years, in his 18 years with the program. It took him only four years to develop a title-winning side. After the turn of the cen- tury, three more titles followed, of which the last was in 2010.

This could mean that the softball team is part of another transformation into a champi- onship-winning side. But how far have they come, and how far do they still have to go?

Thus far, since his first year at the helm, it has taken Ren- nie a maximum of five years to build a championship winning side. On paper, title or no title, 2013 is going to be a big year for Clan Softball team.

Lacrosse the universe with Riley Wanzer

0

WEB-Riley wazner-Vaikunthe Banerjee

Riley Wanzer of the SFU lacrosse team discusses his life as a non-varsity student-athlete

By Clay J. Gray
Photos by Vaikunthe Banerjee

Lacrosse, for those of you that don’t know it is Canada’s national sport. However, that doesn’t mean it is a varsity sport here at SFU. Yet, that doesn’t stop Riley Wanzer, third-year environmental geography major, from donning his helmet, the number three, and taking the field virtually every day.

Like the varsity athletes at SFU, Wanzer and his teammates train once or twice a day, every- day; with field time practically restricted to hours when the sun hasn’t even peeked over the ho- rizon or in the last remaining hours of daylight.

Unlike varsity sports here at SFU, Lacrosse athletes pay around $4,000 a year for the privilege to play. Wanzer said, “It takes a lot of money, it’s one of the things that keeps people from joining. Varsity athletes are at least getting some support from the school, whereas we have to pay extra to play for SFU.”

Yet, the fact that Lacrosse isn’t a varsity team at SFU doesn’t prevent them from being one of the most close knit-teams at the school. Although the players all share in the common expe- rience of balancing school, ath- letics, and other commitments, which creates a mutual respect and friendship. Wanzer pointed towards the team’s general man- ager as the central figure in turn- ing the team into a family.

Riley said, “Our coach’s mom and general manager, Marilyn Hoskins, comes on all of our road trips and cooks us all of our food, every single meal. On Thursdays, we go over to her house and she cooks a meal for all of the guys who aren’t from the lower-mainland.”

Wanzer was aware that SFU lacrosse was a club team before he came and cited the team’s club status as a positive factor in his decision in which school to attend. “Several schools re- cruited me, ranging from Divi- sion I to Division III. One thing I realized was how much more time Lacrosse requires as a var- sity athlete, so, playing for a club team allows me to have a little more free time.”

But, Riley’s life isn’t just about Lacrosse. “I’ve got a season pass to Whistler, so I try to jump up there to go boarding whenever I can. I also Mountain bike, I bring my bike up with me on the bus and then ride down; its one of the perks of going to school on a mountain.” So a school on top of a mountain in the centre of the outdoor sport world was the best fit and obvious choice for this active-outdoorsman.

The stories Wanzer shared about his adolescent years re- volved around working at his family’s business, all of which might sound like it would make for a boring childhood, except for the fact that it was a go-kart track. “When I was in first grade, my parents opened the track with high-speed go-karts that they imported from Europe. Growing up around a go-kart track, there was nothing better than that, it was so much fun at all time,” he reminisced. “I re- member sitting in my dad’s lap and driving before my feet could even reach the pedals.”

Of course, the team makes sure to stop by the track once a year to blow off some steam after one of their road games. “We spend an afternoon rip- ping around the track, the whole team tries to beat me, but no one has yet,” bragged Wanzer.

School is also an impor- tant part of Riley’s life and once again, SFU’s mountaintop location plays a central role. “Being a geography major, I love the location. You look out your classroom and you can see ev- erything, it’s awesome,” he ex- plained. “Even though it can get a little grim during the winter, when all you see is grey clouds and grey concrete, I love SFU.”

When asked what his favou- rite class was, Wanzer said, “My favourite class has been ‘intro to GIS,’ Geography 225. It was cool learning how all the systems worked together.”

However, even with all of Ri- ley’s interests, he said, “I’m still searching for what I want to do. I wouldn’t mind playing La- crosse professionally, but with the average professional player salary being around $35,000 [at best] I don’t think it is the right choice for me. Ideally I would like to have a job that places me in the field, not behind a desk.”

Riley Wanzer is just one of many club athletes that work hard in their sport on and off the field, and still has the life of any SFU student. His dedication and hard work are reflective of the perennial powerhouse that is SFU lacrosse.

Clan women’s basketball rakes in GNAC awards

0

WEB-W basketball-Adam ovenell-carter

SFU basketball teams take home some conference award hardware after regular

By Jade Richardson
Photos by Adam Ovenell-Carter

The Simon Fraser University women’s basketball team has had their share of victories in their impressive 2012–13 season, and as the conference season comes to a close the women are being recognized by the Great Northwest Athletic Conference for their performances so far this year.

Senior Nayo Raincock-Ekunwe headlines this year’s GNAC First All- star team as a third-year repeat all- star, and the 2012–13 GNAC Player of the Year.

She is one of only two players in GNAC history to be named to the First All-Star team three consecu- tive years, and was unanimously se- lected by the conference’s coaches in this year’s poll.

Her Player of the Year award was predicted in early November dur- ing the GNAC pre-season poll, and the 6’2” forward lived up to and sur- passed expectations this year.

Raincock-Ekunwe is the NCAA Division II national leader in field goal percentage and also ranks third in rebounding and in dou- ble-doubles with 18 this season, and was able to break two GNAC records this season.

On Dec. 26, 2012 she broke the conference record for most re- bounds in a single game, with 24, and in early January she earned the GNAC career double-double record, with 49.

That record, which she broke in only three seasons in the GNAC, increased to 59 by the end of the regular season.

“Nayo has improved her focus and game understanding which has helped her immensely this sea- son,” continued Langford. “She has made great gains in her defence, as well as her ability to pass through double-teams.”

Her sophomore teammate Erin Chambers also earned an individ- ual award this season, being named GNAC Defensive Player of the Year.

Chambers was a leader on the Clan’s conference leading de- fence that allowed an average of only 55 points each game. She also averaged 13.6 points per game, as her all-around ability secured her nomination to the GNAC Second All-star team.

“For Erin to be recognized on the second team and as DPOY is wonderful,” continued Langford. “She is strong and very competitive, defending big or little with equal ability.”

Senior Kristina Collins also picked up a pair of conference hon- ours being named to the Second All-star team, as well as the GNAC All-Academic team. Collins boasts a GPA of 3.71 in biomedical physiol- ogy, and was named to the All-Aca- demic team for her third consecu- tive year.

The guard also led the Clan in assists, with 130 on the season, and averages 10.2 points per game.

“Kristina’s leadership is signifi- can’t,” said Langford of the team’s co-captain. “She has risen to every challenge that she faced this year.”
Joining Collins on the All-Aca- demic team were sophomores Katie Lowen and Kia Van Laare.

Lowen, who is working towards a bachelor of arts boasts a GPA of
3.39, is a starter on the Clan line-up, and a first-time All-Academic hon- ouree. The 5’4” guard averages 6.3 points per game and is second on the team in steals and assists, with 42 and 68.

Van Laare also earned the award for the first time, thanks to her GPA of 3.27 in kinesiology at SFU, she averaged 5.3 points per game for the Clan.

Both women were eligible for this award for the first time this year, as athletes must be completing at least their second year of eligibility at their university to make the team.
On the men’s side, Taylor Dunn picked up the lone conference honours for the Clan, receiving honourable mention on the GNAC
all-conference team.

The 6’4 guard scored a total of 320 points for the Clan this season, shooting .388 from the field, and recording 22 steals and 43 assists over the 26-game season.

LAST WORD: Final Frontier

1

peak final frontier

Space colonization just another opportunity for oppression

By Ljudmila Petrovic
Image by Mark Burnham

In 2005, Michael Griffin, the NASA Administrator at the time, announced that the ultimate long-term goal of NASA’s spaceflight programs was space colonization.

“The goal isn’t just scientific exploration… it’s also about extending the range of human habitat out from Earth into the solar system as we go for- ward in time,” he announced. “If we humans want to survive for hundreds of thousands or millions of years, we must ultimately populate other planets.” Basically, what Griffin was acknowledging was that humans were overpopulating the planet, but overusing the resources at such a rate that we would someday render Earth useless — and then we’d move on. Yes, we as a race are so entitled as to believe that not only is the Earth ours to pillage and then discard, but that we have that same authority over the rest of the solar system: if its atmosphere can support human life, then that planet is a free- for-all, right?

A prime example of this at- titude is the Cold War-era Space Race: outer space was used as a battlefield for the power struggle between the USSR and the United Space. The question was not whether the moon was ours to put a flag on, but rather which country’s flag would be the first on the barren land.

It can be argued that it is not space colonization so much as space exploration. It can be argued that we’re doing this for knowledge, or that humanity is gaining something from it. Many points can be argued, but ultimately, we are undeniably taking an entitled approach to how we tread into the universe.

Our libraries are filled with tomes upon tomes outlining the entitled approach that the colonizing nations took when landing upon what they saw as the virgin shores of their conquests: the Romans in ancient times, then the Spanish and Portuguese, later the British Empire, and currently the United States all had the same approach to the countries they were conquering that we have to Mars and the moon.

Just as the aforementioned colonialists did not think to consider what was already there — the natives of the lands that were already established societies — so, too, does NASA not consider that life on these planets could potentially confound these space colonization plans.
It’s true, we have yet to find life on these planets, but would finding this life stop us from setting up camp there? Based on historical precedents, it doesn’t seem likely. After all, we don’t have to look further than our own country’s history to know that even an established society with a rich culture is subject to assimilation attempts, let alone if we were to find mere traces of life on another planet.

“What we normally think of as ‘life’ is based on chains of carbon atoms, with a few other atoms, such as nitrogen or phosphorous,” said Stephen Hawking in his famous lecture “Life in the Universe.” He goes on to mention the possibility of silicone-based life. Again, our egotistical and entitled approach to the universe becomes apparent with our assumptions of carbon- based homogeneity; humans are made of carbon and therefore all forms of life that are worth anything must also have a basis in carbon.

The levels of oppression that have occurred in our histories based on mere shades of skin colour are obscene; what kind of oppression could we possibly expect if the life whose territory we were invading was not even made of the same element as us? “I’m not an elementist, I just don’t like those damn silicone-based ones. Taking all our jobs.”

Would we try and assimilate this life — whatever form it may come in — to be carbon like us? Would we try and enslave them?
If history has shown us anything, it’s that we’re perfectly capable of setting up camp on another planet and then pushing our institutions on them. Hell, we’d probably try and segregate them while we were at it, perhaps establishing separate doors for those made of carbon and those that are silicone-based. Better yet, we’d take away “rights” that weren’t even concepts for these creatures before we landed: want to vote on what we do with the terrain of your planet? Sorry, you’re silicone-based. Only carboners can vote.

Just because we don’t understand this hypothetical life and its possible intelligence, it doesn’t diminish it; yet one of the main qualities of colonialism is the refusal to admit that maybe those that you are colonizing may know things that you don’t. It is more likely than not that we would try and force them away before our big colonization.

We have yet to communicate with other creatures, and Hawking offered several possible explanations as to why in the same speech. He acknowledged that it could be because no intelligent life exists, but his personal view is that there are other forms of intelligent life out there, but that they have simply not acknowledged Earth. In fact, he expressed more concern for the well- being of us Earthlings rather than those we might think we’re invading.

“Meeting a more advanced civilisation, at our present stage, might be a bit like the original inhabitants of America meeting Columbus,” he speculates. “I don’t think they were better off for it.”