Home Blog Page 1037

“Shit-in” advocates for gender-inclusive washrooms

0
Students staged their protest on the 3000 level of the AQ last Wednesday. - Brandon Hillier

SFU community members of all genders mobilized inside a Burnaby campus men’s washroom last Wednesday to advocate for gender-neutral washrooms on campus.

The event, humorously called the “Shit-in,” was a sit-in protest during which students took a stand for inclusivity of transgender students and faculty at SFU.

The group that organized the event, the Gender Inclusive Washroom Committee, argues that the gender binary of public washrooms makes them uncomfortable and unsafe environments for transgender and gender nonconforming people.

The Shit-in lasted from 1 p.m. to about 3:15 p.m. Student advocates demonstrated in the southern hallway of the 3000 level of the AQ outside the washroom, where they sat on chairs with their pants around their ankles, holding signs with messages such as, “Say no to gender policing,” and “Check your potty privilege.”

Several staff and students joined the protest, including gender, sexuality, and women’s studies lecturer and critic-in-residence for Canadian Women in the Literary Arts, Lucas Crawford.

Recent research supports the protesters’ concerns that gender-segregated washrooms are in fact dangerous. A 2013 study produced by the Williams Institute of the University of California, Los Angeles showed that 70 per cent of transgender people surveyed in the Washington, DC area faced harassment or assault, or were even denied entrance to washrooms of their identified gender.

Study author Jody Herman wrote, “The concept of two separate and opposing genders — men and women — is entrenched in our society and reflected in our built environment.” In essence, the socially learned concept of the gender binary is reflected in how our public washrooms are organized.

Signage at the Shit-in conveyed this with a more playful tone, declaring that people have been “potty trained.”

Theron Meyer, a third year gender studies student who helped organize the event, explained, “[The Shit-in is] supposed to raise awareness among students about trans safety and their accessibility when it comes to accessing washrooms. [It is] also [meant] to create a kind of dialogue between university officials and students, a dialogue between students.”

The group is also circulating a petition, addressed to the university administration, to make the change to SFU washrooms.

Meyer expressed their hopes for the event: “What I hope to happen today is just to do our thing and to see some more signatures on the petition.”

SFU’s associate VP student services, Tim Rahilly, issued a statement on behalf of the administration leading up to the event. It reads, “the University has taken steps to provide gender-neutral spaces throughout our three campuses in Burnaby, Vancouver, [and] Surrey.”

Rahilly went on to say that no formal complaint has been made to SFU’s Human Rights and Equity Office regarding gender-neutral washrooms, but the university is working alongside the Simon Fraser Student Society to change the policy to allow preferred names on student IDs.

Meyer told The Peak that the response they had received from the university so far had been “very defensive,” as it states that the school has “already met all these plans and all these changes in terms of trans inclusion.” The university also cited the five single-person gender inclusive washrooms that have already been established in the AQ.

“My response is that it’s not good enough,” Meyer stated.

“I want the university to know that we’re not angry, we’re just dissatisfied. We’re not trying to shame or vilify them, but we want the change.”

Board Shorts

0
WEB_Rebecca_Brandon Hillier
Photo by Brandon Hillier


Build SFU working group reports on steps forward

Board members were tasked earlier this month to recommend ways to move forward with the Build SFU projects following the Special General Meeting (SGM) on January 19. At the meeting on Wednesday, they presented the results of their discussions.

At-large representative Rebecca Langmead clarified that the recommendations were based on the assumption that the No to Build SFU campaign will be putting a ‘revoke the levy’ question for the Spring referendum.

The group recommended that the board refrain from asking any question related to the debenture (loan) in the Spring referendum. Instead, they emphasized the need to reevaluate the project as it currently stands, as well as consider increasing financial support for students through the Build SFU bursary.

The board moved to task the existing working group to look into financial assistance options as well as to develop potential referendum questions in case they become necessary.

 

Personal attacks referenced in discussion of Appreciation Gala

VP student life Kayode Fatoba began a discussion with reference to an SFSS Appreciation Gala that he had begun to organize through the events committee. Fatoba stated that at the events committee meeting, business representative Shadnam Khan had moved to postpone the event indefinitely, and asked for an explanation.

At-large representative Rebecca Langmead replied, “The events committee felt as though it was inappropriate for the committee to approve the event as it was our understanding that the event would not be open to all of our membership.”

She then went on the address the nature of the discussion itself. “To add this to the board agenda as a way to make a personal attack on a committee member and a board member is very unprofessional, and I would advise against it,” she said. “This is not the first time personal attacks have been made, and I would ask that those who have been victimised by such personal attacks understand that they have legal options and health and counselling if they need it.”

SFSS president Chardaye Bueckert echoed Langmead’s sentiments. “This is the third straight board meeting where there’s been unnecessary conflict that could be resolved with one-on-one conversations,” she said. “Students are paying hundreds of dollars right now to have this meeting. Let’s not hash out interpersonal stuff at the board table.”

 

Partial surrender of lease for the MBC office space

Considering that the SFSS plans to eventually move its offices to the proposed Student Union Building (SUB), the society approved the future surrender of a portion of its square footage in the Maggie Benston Centre (MBC) back to the university.

The SFSS would surrender 1,174.86 square metres of space to the university in September, 2017, in return for $3,500,000.

Reflecting the recent uncertainty regarding the Build SFU projects, the paperwork declared that should the SUB project not proceed, the agreement would be nullified.

Editor in Chief Applications — 2015/2016

0

The Peak is electing a new Editor in Chief for the 2015/2016 year, and it’s up to you as a Collective member to cast a well-informed vote. Candidates pitched their platforms at the Collective meeting on Wed., Feb. 18. If you weren’t able to attend, you can listen to their speeches and read their platforms below!

If you are an eligible voter, you should receive an email ballot shortly. The voting period closes at 1:30p.m. on Wed., February 25.


Austin-Cozicar
Austin Cozicar’s EIC Pitch and Platform



Max-Hill
Max Hill’s EIC Pitch and Platform


Brad-Mcleod
Brad McLeod’s EIC Pitch and Platform

Question and Answer Period

SFU Hockey blanks Spartans 3–0

0
Image Credit: Austin Cozicar/ The Peak
Image Credit: Austin Cozicar/ The Peak
Image Credit: Austin Cozicar/ The Peak

Saturday night’s match against the Trinity Western Spartans was a huge test for the Clan. Not only were the Spartans top of the league, but they led the league with a total of 99 goals for, had the top ranked power play, with both the best penalty kill and power play on the road. The Clan were up to the task though, winning 3–0 while holding the Spartans to just 24 shots, and peppering the opposing goalie with 40 of their own.

“Well I thought it was a good 60 minutes, total team effort,” said head coach Mark Coletta after the game. “All the guys played well. It was one of those games that you wait for, and we finally got it, even though it’s late in the season.”

The Clan got off to a great start. Just 3:30 into the opening frame, forward Josh McKissock was left all alone in front, and easily buried the rebound of a point shot from defenceman Tyler Mah.

Trinity Western almost answered with a goal of their own immediately after but were stopped by Clan goaltender Andrew Parent, who had a very strong game. McKissock almost got another one later on, just tipping wide a shot from the side of the net.

SFU increased their lead to two right before the end of the period. A mistake at the blue line led to Jono Ceci being sent in all alone. He made no mistake, streaking in from the left and quickly snapping a shot high glove to make it 2–0 Clan.

The second was dominated by SFU, and by the end they outshot Trinity Western 14–5. The Clan got their third and final goal of the night when forward Tyler Basham was able to get past his check, get his shot off, pick up his own rebound, and deposit it into the back of the net on the wraparound. Just a fantastic goal. Parent wasn’t done with the spectacular saves either, making a great glove save off a point blank chance.

The third was filled with penalties, three for Trinity Western alone. SFU at one point had a 57 second 5-on-3 but couldn’t capitalize, the best chance being when Tyler Basham hit the post. No goals were scored, but the Clan clearly dominated the play thanks to all the power play time.

Coach Coletta revealed the team’s plan to shut down their high scoring offense after the game: “I think you want to just stay tight to guys on the ice, and you want to battle for loose pucks. The defensive zone structure hasn’t changed, it’s just a matter of heart and soul. There’s no crazy systems that will win hockey games in the defensive zone. It’s just battling hard and making sure you’re first to loose pucks, and you’re willing to pay the price.”

SFU’s next home game is  Saturday, in a rematch against Trinity Western. Puck drop is at 7p.m.

SFU: 3
TWU: 0

First Period:
SFU Josh McKissock (1) (Mah) 16:30
SFU Jono Ceci (9) (Ball) 0:46

Second Period:
SFU Tyler Basham (7) (Williamson) 11:35

Third Period:
-No Scoring-

Shots:
SFU 40
TWU 24

Andrew Parent (SFU): 24 Saves/ 24 Shots 1.000 SV%
Silas Matthys (TWU): 37 Saves/ 40 Shots .925 SV%

Three stars:
1st: SFU #1, Andrew Parent 24 Saves, 1.000 SV%
2nd: SFU #19, Josh McKissock 1G, 0A
3rd: SFU #19, Tyler Basham 1G, 0A

Men’s basketball falls short on Senior’s Day

0
Image Credit: Hamed Yaghoubi Shahir
Image Credit: Hamed Yaghoubi Shahir
Image Credit: Hamed Yaghoubi Shahir

On Saturday night, three SFU seniors — guards Sango Niang, Justin Cole, and Daniel Deflorimonte — played their last game in the West Gym. While the tribute before the game was moving, the send off — a 112–84 loss against the Central Washington (CWU) Wildcats — was probably not the one the Clan seniors were looking for.

“I think the emotions of Senior’s Night, and the emotions of the last home game effected us,” said head coach James Blake. “I’ve gone through quite a few last games of the year with seniors, and it’s always hard to gauge how people are going to react to the night [. . .] They kind of got caught up in it and forgot what our game plan is.”

Though SFU did not score first, they actually jumped out to the early lead — peaking at 18–14. Deflorimonte — the only one of the seniors to play his entire collegiate career at SFU — opened the scoring for the Clan. Fittingly, much of the early scoring belonged to the seniors, with the first 12 points scored by SFU coming from the three outgoing seniors.

Despite the early lead, the Wildcats quickly clawed their way back, taking the lead — and ran with it. Though the early first half was close, in the last eight minutes of the first — when before Central Washington was up only one point — the Clan only scored 15 points while the Wildcats put up 32 points.

Even much of the second half was close, but the gap created by the late first half run proved too much for the Clan. Wildcat center Jason Stroud’s defensive play proved to be a real thorn in the Clan’s side, with four blocks — three more than anybody else in the game, while teammate Dom Williams achieved a double-double with 27 points and 10 assists.

A below-average night on the three point line did not help things, as the Clan only shot seven threes, down from their conference leading average, 12.6 per game.

While the final result was far from what any Clan fan would describe as a good game many of the individual results were solid. All three seniors had great nights with Cole leading the team in scoring for the second night in a row with 23 points, while Deflorimonte — who averages 5.9 points per game, and only has hit double digits five times this season — notched 13 points.

In the end, the night will be remembered by most, not for the forgettable final result, but for being the final chance to see Niang, Cole, and Deflorimonte live playing in a Clan jersey — barring an alumni game appearance. Coach Blake had nothing but praise for the three outgoing seniors.

“All three of them are just great kids. They just want to help the team get better,” he said. “I’m pretty sure if we had more of those types of guys that we’d be better overall as a team.”

“It was very emotional knowing it was my last [game at home],” explained Cole, who transferred to SFU from Chaffey Community College with Niang two seasons ago. “We have three more away games coming up, but it ain’t nothing like playing at home in front of your family and friends.”

SFU

Points: 84
Field Goals: 33–74 (44.6%)
3 Pointers: 7–21 (33.3%)
Free Throws: 11–12 (91.7%)

CWU

Points: 112
Field Goals: 47–84 (56.0%)
3 Pointers: 9–26 (34.6%)
Free Throws: 9–13 (69.2%)

Player of the Game: Justin Cole

Realistically the Player of the Game award could go to any of the seniors, but Justin Cole was not only the scoring leader with 23 points, but also one of the clear drivers when it looked like SFU could still make a comeback. There might not have been a comeback, but you can’t blame Cole for that with 14 points in the second half alone.

Points: 23
Assists: 1
Rebounds (Off-Def): 2–6

A plea from an anti-vaccinator

0
Photo courtesy of NIAID (Flickr)

 

I am the mother of two beautiful young boys. One is seven years old, in grade two, and wants to be an astronaut when he’s older. The other is four-and-a-half years old, not quite as outgoing as his older brother, and unmercilessly good at Jenga. Both of my sons are happy, both are healthy, and both are unvaccinated.

I know what you’re thinking. I get it all the time whenever someone new in my life learns about my decision to forgo vaccinating my children. There’s the look of disbelief, the underlying tone of accusation that comes with someone asking me if I know what I’m doing. They tell me things like, “Did you know that by not vaccinating your kids, you’re not just putting them in danger but other kids too?”

Well, I have something to say to everyone who thinks mandatory cootie vaccinations for children is a good idea: you’re being lied to.

Did you know that, despite being widely available to kids everywhere, no real scientific testing has been done on the long- or short-term effects of cootie shots? It’s a gaping hole of unsubstantiated evidence that pharmaceutical companies have been filling with propaganda about public safety and scare tactics.

Cooties, or cootieum ickius as it’s known in the scientific community, is still a relatively new virus when compared to diseases like measles. There’s no clear information on when the first case of cooties was reported, but the very first cootie vaccination was administered in 1949 by five-year-old Ashton Thompson on a playground in St. Augustine, Florida. After that, the cootie vaccination became a regular part of standard health practices amongst school children. It seems like most of the population haven’t looked back since.

It’s important to remember that our society wasn’t always so heavily medicated and vaccinated. Before Thompson developed the cootie shot, no deaths had been directly linked to the cootie virus. Mankind had survived for millennia without this “cure,” so why the recent push from governments and other pro-vaccination groups for mandatory immunization?

Did you know that the cootie shot contains actual traces of the cootie virus? That’s how vaccines work: the shots contain weakened cootie cells meant to trigger your body into developing a resistance to the disease. Sometimes children can experience a negative reaction to the shot and develop side effects, including feelings of “ickiness” or even developing full-blown cooties. Pharmaceutical companies want you to believe that somehow, you have to make someone sick before they can get better.

There are people out there who want you to think that cooties is a harmful disease — and it can be — but there are natural, holistic ways to combat cooties other than vaccinating your children. For example, did you know a simple mixture of lavender, paprika, and dried shrimp flakes applied to a child’s skin twice a day can render him or her almost entirely immune to cooties? People have been using this traditional recipe for years, but corporations don’t want you to know about it because it’s not profitable for them. This is the kind of information the population needs to hear about.

So consider this my personal plea, from a mother who only wants the best for her kids: before blindly vaccinating your children against diseases like cooties, do some research, consider the facts, and explore the alternatives. I may not be a doctor, a scientist, or even the most educated person around, but that doesn’t mean I don’t know what’s best for other people.

Love and morbidity feature in The Addams Family musical

0
Photo courtesy of Align Entertainment.

The Addams Family musical offers a fun evening of singing, dancing, laughing, and live music. The titular family are known for their morbid tastes, and the musical portrays them as one would expect, except for the central love story that is at odds with their reputation. 

The story revolves around the family’s reaction to daughter Wednesday’s love interest, a “normal” boy from Ohio. From their initial distrust to their acceptance, this storyline doesn’t seem to fit with their image, particularly the happy ending which seems to unfold too smoothly for the Addams family. 

The boy, Lucas Beineke, has caused Wednesday to feel things she has never felt before. In one funny moment, Wednesday shows an unfamiliar fondness for “cute” things; she even welcomes a bird into her hands before she unceremoniously snaps its neck.

Photo courtesy of Align Entertainment.
Photo courtesy of Align Entertainment.

The musical certainly brings to light questions of what it means to be a family. Each family is different and they all have their own quirks, and sometimes it is important to accept the qualities that make them unique. Although the premise may be Wednesday and Lucas’ relationship, the story follows the multiple relationships of the other characters, including Gomez and Morticia Addams, Mal and Alicia Beineke, and Fester and his desire for the moon.

The Addams are eccentric but function like any well-meaning family. They are caring, in their own unique manner, and harbour no fewer traditions or quirks than any other family out there. For example, Pugsley becomes concerned that his sister’s love will affect their own relationship and that she would never torture him again. In this version, Pugsley is depicted as the younger sibling rather than the older brother.

The family often does not see themselves as different, but in one scene, Wednesday acknowledges their eccentricities and differences when she asks the other Addams to “act normal.” On the other side, Lucas also displays the same behaviour, when he asks his more conventional parents to behave “normally.”

The production involves a number of large musical numbers, often using the Addams ancestors as the ensemble and including well-known gestures from the television show, such as the trademark two snaps. The presence of the Addams ancestors successfully complements the soloists rather than overshadowing them; their grey monochrome costumes were both individually unique yet stylistically uniform.

It is evident that a lot of work, time, and money went into making this production. In many ways it was successful: the presence of the large musical numbers, the detailed costumes, the flashy lighting design, and the ever-changing set pieces fit the Broadway aesthetic. There were, however, times when the use of spotlights on the individual soloist would dilute some of the lighting design in the background.

The result further emphasized the theatricality of the piece rather than one with more realistic components. 

This atmosphere of a created environment may take away from some of the authenticity the production is aiming for. The result is a rather common love story with a few quirks, and a family that is familiar to the audience in fundamental sense, if not in nature. 

For fans of the Addams family cartoon, television series, or films, or those wanting a small taste of the quirky Addams family and a simple, well-meaning family drama, this production is for you.

The Addams Family runs from February 6–21 at the Michael J. Fox Theatre. For more information, visit michaeljfoxtheatre.ca.

Andy Kim trades toothache for heartache on It’s Decided

0
Photo courtesy of eOne Music Canada.

Looking like a cross between Bryan Ferry and Gene Simmons, and sounding like Bono without the uncomfortable preaching, Andy Kim’s latest, It’s Decided, rings with a beautifully pained nostalgia.

The opening track, “Sister OK,” is honest in its melancholy, informing that “love will not raise you up” — a far cry from Kim’s billboard topping saccharine lyrics in “Sugar, Sugar” (from his former days working with The Archies).

Kim sticks with honest and melancholic themes for many of the tracks, and constantly asks rhetorical questions that wonder at the inexplicability of life. “Why Can’t I” sees Kim looking back at the many wrong paths he’s followed in life, while “It’s Emotional” is, well, emotional.

Photo courtesy of eOne Music Canada.
Photo courtesy of eOne Music Canada.

Kim worked alongside fellow Canadian Kevin Drew, of Broken Social Scene, whose influence can be felt throughout the album. This can be heard particularly on tracks such as “Heaven Without a Gun” and at the end of “Who Came First,” the album’s closing track. Here, Broken Social Scene’s influence can be heard as the song fades away slowly, with a repeated vocal that sounds like it was recorded in a not-too-distant location (reminiscent of Kevin Drew’s vocals on the BSS track “Almost Crimes”).

Opting for a Canadiana vibe, Kim employed the help of other noteworthy Canadian musicians Dave Hamelin of The Stills, Kevin Hearne of Barenaked Ladies, and Ron Sexsmith.

Kim’s lyrics pose some heavy questions, but when the album isn’t lamenting the past, it has some upbeat moments that just might get you moving — providing you temporarily ignore the words.

The clap-happy “Sail On” and the previously mentioned “Who Came First” are the album’s most upbeat peaks. The music seems to transcend genres, a mix between jazz, electronic, and pop. Kim may not stick to one genre of music, but thematically he hardly ever strays from his honest, deep-thinking, reflective tone.

Listening to It’s Decided is unlikely to be a reassuring experience, but if you’re looking to question the meaning of life, you could do a lot worse than lines like “who came first: night or the day?”

Obese modelling encourages unhealthy lifestyles

0
Illustration by Saida Saetgareeva
Illustration by Saida Saetgareeva
Illustration by Saida Saetgareeva

I’ve never been able to watch shows like America’s Next Top Model because I cringe at how unnaturally thin most of these models are. I simply can’t celebrate the accomplishments of these women; many of them live, and promote, unhealthy lifestyles to achieve the figure that they want.

Recently, I’ve considered the opposite side of the modelling spectrum, and I’ve found that the situation in this case isn’t any different. Models who are grossly overweight, like those who are dangerously underweight, shouldn’t be encouraged, as both promote unhealthy lifestyles.

Tess Munster, also know as Tess Holliday, is the first model of her size to sign a contract with MiLK, a major modeling agency. Tess is 5’5”, weighs approximately 260 pounds, and gained popularity through social media as a makeup artist and model. Tess is also behind an online movement entitled #EffYourBeautyStandards, which encourages body positivity and diversity. 

Now, let me be clear: I believe that shaming people who are overweight is wrong. However, there is a problem with praising Tess’s figure as a model; someone who is at a weight considered by medical professionals to be associated with a variety of diseases. Her recent ascent to fame now makes her a role model for millions, and sends the message that having a weight labelled as obese is okay, or even cool.

Is there no healthy way to model one’s body? I’ll make it clear that, in a world dominated by models who display bodies that are realistically too thin, I understand that many models deemed “plus-sized” actually show off realistic portrayals of what a healthy body should be. Many of these models aren’t overweight in the slightest, and I praise them for stepping out and providing the world with a sense of realism. This is the way modelling should be.

However, very overweight models fall into line with the underweight ones. Their bodies are related to serious risks such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, infertility, stroke, dementia, inflammatory arthritis, depression — the list is extensive. In North America, these health issues are already a devastating problem, and one that the media should encourage us to avoid.

A study conducted in 2013 by Roland Sturm and Aiko Hattori indicates that morbid obesity is still on the rise in the US. In Canada, we’re not much better. Obesity rates have nearly doubled in males and females of all age groups between 1981–2009. With this fact in mind, why are we adding gasoline to the fire?

It’s further disappointing that a company such as MiLK now exerts its ideological influence by glorifying someone for their unhealthy lifestyle, and successfully disperses a message to others that they should encourage this as well.

I agree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but when you glorify obesity and promote serious health issues, it becomes a problem. Whether you think fat is beautiful or ugly is irrelevant, the fact is that that being extremely overweight is correlated with  a shortened life — one that we should strive to lengthen as much as possible.

Archie Andrews walks with the zombies

0
Photo courtesy of Archie Comics.

Afterlife with Archie is the most grounded storyline featuring America’s favorite redhead to be published in the past few decades. We have seen Archie team up with Marvel’s Punisher at prom night, jam with the rock band KISS, and hang out with the characters from Glee. In a couple months from now, he will even be sharing an uncomfortable vacation with the Predator.

Archie Comics have never shied away from odd mashups over the years, and it’s a wonder the publishers didn’t set their sights on the zombie genre ages ago. When the book was first announced, I could not help but roll my eyes at the prospect of another zombie-centric storyline. It seemed like another decaying corpse thrown upon a pile of so many other similar storylines.

Yet, somehow, Afterlife with Archie manages to stand out. It remains fresh while so many among it have gone stagnant.

One might argue the storyline borrows from Tim Burton’s Frankenweenie, and simply replaces science for magic. It is functional and somewhat paint-by-numbers, but this never takes away from the overall experience. That is in part because of Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa’s strong script.

Photo courtesy of Archie Comics.
Photo courtesy of Archie Comics.

In as little as a few pages, Sacasa establishes the characters long-time fans have come to know, but in a way that is accessible to new readers as well. Archie and his friends remain true to their original incarnations, but with added depth. For example, the indecisively lovesick Archie Andrews is replaced with a version who seems more nauseated with Betty and Veronica.

In this story, more emphasis is given to the strong friendship between Jughead and Archie, an element sometimes not placed in the spotlight due to his uproarious love life. It’s a breath of fresh air, and part of what makes this story so compelling.

Sacasa moves the story along at a steady pace, but never sacrifices character development. Every character gets a moment to shine in this horrific tale. As the story progresses, we are given more intimate looks into their psyches, and a chance to establish strong connections with the often-flawed characters.

Francesco Francavilla’s artwork stands as nothing less than a perfect pairing to go along with Sacasa’s frightening script. On the surface, the pencils are simple enough and get the job done. However, the shading and limited use of colours is what really makes this comic unique.

Using only oranges, blues, and pinks, Francavilla succeeds in striking a horrific tone throughout the whole comic. Whether it be a horrific scene of Riverdale’s undead or an emotionally poignant character’s flashback, Francavilla never misses a beat. His artwork alone is worth the cover price.

Afterlife with Archie is an emotional tour de force, one that will leave old fans as well as new ones on the edge of their seats. Its richly characterized cast will leave you wishing that everyone might live to see a happier ending.