Go back

“X: Psychiatric Solitary Confinement” gives patients their voices back

By: Roshi Chadha, SFU Student

Content Warning: Mentions and descriptions of psychiatric solitary confinement, traumatic experiences, mental health policies, and mistreatment of mental health patients

On July 7, SFU department of English hosted X: Psychiatric Solitary Confinement, a live performance by Erin Soros, SFU Shadbolt fellow. This event was conducted through Zoom and focused on mental health policies around solitary confinement for psychiatric patients. The discussion and Q&A portion of the event was moderated by Harsha Walia, an activist and author from South Asia with a home base in Vancouver. 

Previously, I had never thought of the plight that mental health patients go through within different psychiatric wards across the world. As someone who plans on working within the healthcare field, I knew this was an important topic to learn about. 

The event had accessibility features like live transcription, links to various articles and resources related to the event, spoken words by performers in the chat, and audio description throughout the performance. As the event could trigger audience members’ traumatic experiences, a content warning prefaced the performance and they welcomed anonymous questions from participants.

As the event unfolded, I tried to imagine entering a room with no sound. Suddenly a voice tells you, “No window, no lamp for reading. You cannot read, no clock. The one light in the ceiling is inescapable.” 

There were several performers who voluntarily joined Soros to help her run the event through their voices and powerful words. Many of them had also experienced forced mental health treatments and had joined to share their opinions and thoughts. This had a powerful effect of conveying solidarity to the audience. 

The performance started with the description of a person who is isolated in a dark room. As one of the performers said, “Words like ‘solitary confinement’ [are] borrowed from the realms of prison and its punishments.” As mentioned during the performance, restraint and seclusion are two different words in literature but in psychiatric language, are used interchangeably. This conveyed how convoluted the whole psychiatric model is and why there is a need to address these social concerns. 

I could feel the tension, uncertainty, and sadness as the performers kept on explaining the sufferings of someone who goes into confinement. “Come back. You cry to the wall. Come release me.” The performance showed their need to be released and free in the outside world. As they uttered the words, “No dialogue no movement,” I imagined it must feel like everything comes to a standstill for a person held in there. What kind of life or treatment is this? 

After an incredibly powerful performance, some audience members shared their experiences with one another, followed by a Q&A session. Soros discussed the legal challenges around BC laws. She explained how the government fought against the Council of Canadians with Disabilities’ charter challenge to the Mental Health Act. Now, the topic of solitary confinement is being challenged under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, drawing on principles from the United Nations Convention of People with Disabilities. Soros concluded the event by highlighting the importance of being a witness and how she hopes to be a witness for others who go through these actions of ill treatment and be a voice for them. 

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

GSS and SFSS express concern over heating conditions in student residences

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer On April 27, the Graduate Student Society (GSS) and Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) issued a joint letter to SFU Residence and Housing regarding concerns over heating and cooling facilities in student residences. The letter alleged that inadequate student housing cooling facilities created a dangerous environment for students to study and live in. This letter was shared with The Peak.  The Peak reached out to Kody Sider, the director of external relations at the GSS, as well as Hyago Santana Moreira, the SFSS vice-president university and academic affairs. Sider alleged that students were regularly suffering through temperatures above 26℃, which is the province’s legal limit for living spaces according to subsection 9.33.2 of the BC building code.  “The university has done little...

Read Next

Block title

GSS and SFSS express concern over heating conditions in student residences

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer On April 27, the Graduate Student Society (GSS) and Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) issued a joint letter to SFU Residence and Housing regarding concerns over heating and cooling facilities in student residences. The letter alleged that inadequate student housing cooling facilities created a dangerous environment for students to study and live in. This letter was shared with The Peak.  The Peak reached out to Kody Sider, the director of external relations at the GSS, as well as Hyago Santana Moreira, the SFSS vice-president university and academic affairs. Sider alleged that students were regularly suffering through temperatures above 26℃, which is the province’s legal limit for living spaces according to subsection 9.33.2 of the BC building code.  “The university has done little...

Block title

GSS and SFSS express concern over heating conditions in student residences

By: Niveja Assalaarachchi, News Writer On April 27, the Graduate Student Society (GSS) and Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) issued a joint letter to SFU Residence and Housing regarding concerns over heating and cooling facilities in student residences. The letter alleged that inadequate student housing cooling facilities created a dangerous environment for students to study and live in. This letter was shared with The Peak.  The Peak reached out to Kody Sider, the director of external relations at the GSS, as well as Hyago Santana Moreira, the SFSS vice-president university and academic affairs. Sider alleged that students were regularly suffering through temperatures above 26℃, which is the province’s legal limit for living spaces according to subsection 9.33.2 of the BC building code.  “The university has done little...