Home Blog Page 778

Thadoe Wai elected as environment representative for the SFSS

0
Thadoe Wai reacts with glee upon learning that he won the position of environment representative for the SFSS.

It took a couple of elections, but the 2016–17 Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) will finally have a representative for the faculty of environment, and that person is Thadoe Wai.

With no candidates running in the general election last spring, Wai beat out running mate Supreet Malhi garnering two-thirds of the vote. He collected 61 of the 91 votes cast in the race.

“I’m feeling elated about it,” Wai said. “It was kind of nerve-wracking I guess, although I’m pretty happy about the results. I’m also pretty happy to have run in this election, and get the exposure I’ve received from it.”

Wai thanked Malhi for being his opponent, as the two seemed to form a good friendship running against each other. Malhi tweeted out congratulations for Wai from bed, as he was sick and missed the announcement.

Wai was still a little tired from the early morning that was the 9 a.m. announcements, but said he hopes to start to get to work soon as the new environment representative.

“Next few months, to be honest it’s hard to say because it’s the morning, but I do hope to start working together with people from my DSU [Departmental Student Union] as well as other people from the faculty and start forming a plan to help strengthen the faculty,” he said.  e 

SFU students say “Yes We Chen,” vote Larissa as SFSS President

1
Larissa Chen (right) is congratulated by Deepak Sharma upon learning that she won the SFSS byelection.

Larissa Chen will serve as the Simon Fraser Student Society president for the rest of the 20162017 term.

The former VP Student Services was thrust into the role on an interim basis when Deepak Sharma resigned, and managed both roles until her own resignation before the byelection. From here on out, she’ll serve as Chair of the Board of Directors, winning by a landslide over her two runningmates.

Chen secured 55.8 percent of the vote, ahead of second place Darien Lechner (25.9 percent) and third place Sharma (18.3 percent) who failed in his attempt to reclaim the presidency. A total of 1,574 students cast a vote for president in the byelection. 

“The past few weeks have been overwhelming with support and so much interaction with people,” she said. “It was kind of interesting stepping away from board and to see the real world outside of board.

“I’m just so happy, I’m so lucky.”

She’ll only have a few hours to celebrate, as the next board meeting takes place at 2:30 pm today.

$5 a Day Challenge: Starving for sustainable solutions

0

This is the final post in a week-long web series that documents Kevin Rey’s experiences living off of $5 worth of food a day.

When my editor and I were talking about this challenge in the planning phases, she said that I should feel free to bail out if I started to become really malnourished. Of course, I laughed it off and said I would be fine, and went ahead with the challenge anyway.

She apparently didn’t believe me, because after she saw the groceries I’d bought, she repeatedly told me that I was “going to die.” But after spending $35 for a week’s worth of food, I managed to survive.

It definitely wasn’t totally smooth sailing, though. At the outset, I was faced with this idea of “planning ahead” that I really wasn’t used to. Because I didn’t want to deal with the nitty-gritty details, I made a few mistakes with my money.

Like how I bought milk, but I should have gotten cream or something that was better to cook with. I also managed to eat eight eggs in one week, which is probably too much cholesterol (even though eggs have been OK’d by new dietary guidelines). I should have also been a bit more aware of where my protein was coming from, since my diet was really carb-heavy. Soy isn’t a viable replacement for me because of allergies, but I probably could have gotten some mushrooms or fish.

This week, I made a few blunders in the kitchen, too. Right after all that talk about reducing food waste, I realized that I had let some pasta dough go bad in the fridge. There’s also that gross alfredo sauce that I might not be able to do anything with.

Every time that happens, I’m reminded of the other times I’ve wasted food, and I feel guilty and frustrated that it’s happened again.

That’s not the first time I’ve felt “trapped” when it comes to food. A while ago, I watched a particularly convincing documentary that made an excellent case for buying local food. The next time I went to the grocery store, I read through the label of everything to see where it was made, and I put back everything that I wasn’t sure was from Canada. I was also trying to think of the nutrition of everything I was buying and maybe try to get an organic version of it if I could.

But because I was so hung up on trying to do something that was environmentally blameless, I ended up buying almost nothing. I was overwhelmed by the perceived weight of my actions, so I didn’t do anything.

I was also comparing myself to this mythical hyper-sustainable person I thought existed somewhere in Yaletown or the West End. This hypothetical person only buys used clothes, makes everything from scratch, has their own balcony garden, and generates no garbage. I am definitely not that person.

I’m in my third year of my PhD, and I have to juggle way too much to be 100 percent local and zero waste. But despite the fact that I’m not perfect, I think I’m making progress.

I started making my own pasta, so I cut down on the packaging and processing. I also learned that using dried beans isn’t that hard, so I can cut down on the cans I buy from the store. Those changes are pretty boring on their own, but over time, I think they will matter in some tangible way.

So I’ll wrap this $5 a day challenge up with a new challenge for you: change one thing about the way you eat for the next week.

You could commit to cooking one more meal for yourself than you usually do. Or you could eat one more meal made with leftovers. At the grocery store, you could buy one less thing that isn’t grown in North America, or plan to go one more day without eating meat. You could also bring one more meal with you to school rather than buying. Start small, and celebrate your success.

Because I think if we took small steps together, we would set ourselves up for the dramatic changes we really want.

Thanks for reading, and good cooking.

NFL Blitz with Jason Romisher Week 11

0
Ben Roethlisberger is 20–2 all-time against the Cleveland Browns.

Last week 5–9

Season 84–61–2

Byes: Atlanta, Denver, New York Jets, San Diego

Well, the winning streak couldn’t go on forever. Just 5–9 last week, but I took great satisfaction in watching the Packers get throttled by the Titans. How exciting was the Denver vs. New Orleans finish?! If you didn’t see the highlights, watch them below. You’ve got to love sports!  

On that note, to week 11 we go.

New Orleans (4–5) at Carolina (3–6), Thursday 5:25 p.m.

Both teams are coming off excruciating losses last week and need to win to keep any hopes of a playoff appearance alive. See above for the recap of the Saints method of losing. The Panthers went a more traditional route, by blowing a comfortable 17–3 fourth quarter advantage at home to the Chiefs. These two teams played earlier in the season with the Saints prevailing in a high-scoring shootout. This time, the Panthers have home field advantage and the Saints have to play on grass where they are less dynamic. I don’t see the same determination and drive from Cam Newton this year, whereas Drew Brees has left it all on the table. I’ll take the Saints in this one.

Prediction: Saints 33 Panthers 27

Jacksonville (2–7) at Detroit (5–4), Sunday 10 a.m.    

With both Minnesota and Green Bay reeling, the Lions have a chance to sprint away with the NFC Central if they can put some wins together. They are rested off the bye and face one of the worst teams in the league.

Prediction: Lions 28 Jaguars 17     

Mini-upset special

Buffalo (4–5) at Cincinnati (3–5–1), Sunday 10 a.m.

What a difference a year makes. Last year, the Bengals were 8–1 at this point and looked like a Super Bowl contender. They have been in the playoffs the last four years despite playing in the ultra-competitive AFC Central. Meanwhile, Buffalo looked good earlier in the season with a 4–2 record in head coach Rex Ryan’s second season. The Bills then promptly lost three straight games, but are coming off their bye. I found this to be the hardest game to call this week and will roll with Buffalo and their exciting offensive tandem of quarterback Tyrod Taylor and running back LeSean McCoy.

Prediction: Bills 32 Bengals 28     

Chicago (2–7) at New York Giants (6–3), Sunday 10 a.m.

There are reports out of Chicago that the Bears players have lost faith in quarterback Jay Cutler. Chicago also found out this week that star receiver Alshon Jeffery has been suspended for four games for taking performance-enhancing drugs. Add the fact that the Bears are playing consecutive road games and facing a hot Giants team coming off an impressive victory over the Bengals, and this will be an easy win for the Giants.

Prediction: Giants 38 Bears 13     

Tennessee (5–5) at Indianapolis (4–5), Sunday 10 a.m.

OK, the AFC South is beginning to look presentable, so I will comment on this matchup. With an exciting and dynamic young quarterback and an outstanding running game, the Titans are looking like a solid ball club. Facing them is a Colts team with a weak defence and poor offensive line. These are two ingredients that are essential to winning. How have they won four games, you might ask? Andrew Luck is really, really good. I like the Titans to keep the mojo rolling despite being on the road against a rested Colts squad. Look for another strong game from Titans running back DeMarco Murray.

Prediction: Titans 38 Colts 31

Pittsburgh (4–5) at Cleveland (0–10), Sunday 10 a.m.

The Steelers demonstrated last week that they could play at an elite level, despite falling late to the Cowboys. They will be highly motivated to win this divisional battle as the Ravens at 5–4 are within sight for the division lead. A citation to one of my former players, Jesse Batchelor, for providing this key statistic: Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is 20–2 all-time against the Browns, and has faced 12 different starting quarterbacks in these matchups. The Steelers should easily win this one.

Prediction: Steelers 40 Browns 21

Arizona (4–4–1) at Minnesota (5–4), Sunday 10 a.m.

Has a 5–0 team ever fallen to 5–5 in NFL history? Minnesota is facing this ignoble prospect. The Vikings are a mess on offence and regressing on defence. They are facing a Cardinals team that has disappointed overall this season and is coming off an ugly win against the woeful 49ers. The Cardinals have the edge in this matchup because they can actually score points, whereas the Vikings have the worst statistical offensive output in the league.

Prediction: Cardinals 21 Vikings 14

Game of the Week

Baltimore (5–4) at Dallas (8–1), Sunday 10 a.m.

It’s official everyone: the quarterback controversy in Dallas is over, as Tony Romo has officially conceded his starting position to upstart rookie Dak Prescott. This matchup of division leaders features an underdog in Baltimore that sports an outstanding defence and Super Bowl champion quarterback. While that recipe is an intriguing blend for an upset of the week pick, I do not see the Ravens able to keep pace with the explosive Dallas offence. The other Dallas rookie sensation, Ezekiel Elliott, continues to dazzle with a big game against a stellar defence.

Prediction: Cowboys 27 Ravens 19

Tampa Bay (4–5) at Kansas City (7–2), Sunday 10 a.m.        

Tampa is coming off a convincing win last week over the Bears, whereas the Chiefs escaped with a quality win on the road against the Panthers. The Chiefs vs. Broncos game next week was bumped up by the NFL to the premier Sunday Night time slot over the New England game and pretty boy quarterback Tom Brady. The Chiefs validate the league’s belief in them with a hard-fought victory over the Bucs.

Prediction: Chiefs 29 Buccaneers 24

Miami (5–4) at Los Angeles (4–5), Sunday 1:05 p.m.

The Rams have finally pulled the trigger and will be starting first overall draft pick Jared Goff at quarterback. All season, they have been plagued by poor quarterback play and watched while several other teams inserted rookie quarterbacks and won. The Rams clearly understand that they made a huge mistake trading away multiple draft picks for Goff with the likes of Dak Prescott being available in the fourth round. I expect Goff to struggle and Miami to continue its torrid play as they cruise to their fifth win in a row.

Prediction: Dolphins 30 Rams 10      

New England (7–2) at San Francisco (1–8), Sunday 1:25 p.m.

Could the week 17 matchup between the Patriots and Dolphins determine the division winner? With the Patriots stunning loss last week to the Seahawks, the AFC East is now in play. The Patriots have a long trip out west and are facing a team that has received increasingly strong play from controversial quarterback Colin Kaepernick. If the Patriots are complacent, it could come back to bite them in a big way. Belichick, Brady, and company will not allow a let-down in this one.  

Prediction: Patriots 35 49ers 24

Philadelphia (5–4) at Seattle (6–2–1), Sunday 1:25 p.m.      

The Eagles are coming off a big-time win at home against the Falcons and are facing a Seahawks team that is flying high after an extremely emotional victory over the Patriots. An encouraging sign for the Seahawks was that their line play seemed improved last week, and they were able to achieve some offensive balance with a strong running game from rookie C.J. Prosise. Seattle is also one of the toughest places to play in the NFL and boasts unreal crowd noise. The 12th man coupled with the Seahawks defence will be enough to rattle Eagles rookie quarterback Carson Wentz in a big Seahawks win.

Prediction: Seahawks 31 Eagles 19

Green Bay (4–5) at Washington (5–3–1), Sunday 5:30 p.m.

The Packers have lost four of their last five games with the only win coming over the lowly Bears. They got throttled last week at Tennessee in a 47–25 beat down and are playing consecutive road games.  Meanwhile Washington is coming off a solid victory over Minnesota and looks like a team that can vie for a wild card.
Prediction: Washington 27 Packers 24

Houston (6–3) at Oakland (7–2), Monday 5:30 p.m.

Here is the argument for a Texans victory: Houston is coming off back-to-back wins which include a quality win over the Lions. They were also able to defeat the Chiefs in week one, giving them two quality non-division wins. Oakland is a young team that a few weeks ago set the league record for accepted penalties in a game, and may have lost momentum as they were on bye last week. With that being said, Oakland is exponentially more talented than Houston, and will win this game in convincing fashion.

Prediction: Raiders 37 Texans 20

$5 a Day Challenge: Meatless Monday, and Tuesday, and Wednesday . . .

0

This is the sixth post in a week-long web series that documents Kevin Rey’s experiences living off of $5 worth of food a day. Go to the-peak.ca/category/features/ to read earlier posts!

One of the things I’ve had to get used to this week was not eating any meat.

It was more of a decision based on practicality, since meat is a lot more expensive than other sources of protein. I might have been able to afford it if I bought my supplies from a chain grocery store, but buying local was the most important thing to me.

But really, this week was another step in my long process of cutting down how much meat I eat. Specifically, beef.

Before I get into it, I know that there are plenty of different opinions on how we should make these kinds of decisions. You don’t have to look very far on the Internet before you find a meme making fun of vegans, or a news post shaming the meat or dairy industry for treating animals badly. There are literally dozens of documentaries on Netflix that all advocate for being vegan, and at least one on cooking the perfect steak.

For me, the most important reason to eat less meat is that it takes a lot of feed to raise, and cows fart.

We’ve known for a long time that cows produce methane from their digestion, but in the past three years, the world has become significantly more vocal about the effects of climate change.

It has huge implications for our industry and society, since a lot of what we use and eat produces greenhouse gases and has global effects. Dozens of papers in top scientific journals have linked human activity with the global increase in temperatures, which will lead to ocean-level rise and more extreme weather patterns unless there is a coordinated effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases we emit.

World governments have taken this very seriously, drafting the Paris Climate Agreement last year, where 197 countries committed themselves to limiting global warming to 2 C above pre-industrial levels.

I’ve been following climate change news pretty closely, especially since I started reporting on the oil pipeline that is proposed to be built through Burnaby Mountain. To summarize incredibly briefly, there’s a lot of solid evidence that shows this pipeline is a terrible idea.

Anyways.

Someone showed me a graphic online a while ago that broke down how much food (and thereby carbon) it takes to raise animals for meat. Beef was by far the most environmentally harmful; some experts say that if we gave it up, it would be better than giving up cars. Pork and lamb are also fairly carbon intensive. Wasting food altogether is even worse, which is what makes Embark’s Food Rescue program so exciting for me.

After humming and hawing about the chart, I thought, “I could probably not eat beef for a while.” So that’s exactly what I did.

Don’t get me wrong, though. Every now and then I’ll have a burger, or pulled pork, or roast lamb, but it’s pretty simple for me to not buy any of that at home.

For a long time, I didn’t think about how my food got to me. I had bigger things to worry about, like getting through my courses, managing my personal relationship, and playing way too many video games. But thinking of how much beef I eat was a gateway for me to think about all of my food and how it affects the environment. I started to think of all of the ways I could buy locally so less fuel was burned to ship it here, and how I could reduce the amount of garbage I make.

I’m happy to pay more and eat less meat if it means helping the environment.

Except for that butternut squash, though — $5 is highway robbery.

Second half mistakes foil Clan’s last chance for a win, end season 0–10

0
SFU led 13–12 before giving up 28 unanswered points.

Things were looking up for the Clan at halftime. The early morning rain had cleared just in time for kickoff. Despite a pick-six thrown by quarterback Miles Richardson just 58 seconds in, SFU was down only 12–7 thanks to a defence that had completely stopped the run game (Western Oregon had -40 rushing yards at halftime).

There was an energy, an excitement, at Swangard Stadium that hadn’t been there all season. For the first time, fans were seeing a team that could win the game and, if play kept up, a team that should win.

Even the offence was moving the ball, over doubling the Wolves’ yard totals 164–72, with a rare offensive touchdown to show for it. Thanks to the Wolves missing twice on two-point conversions, SFU was in a position to not just tie Western Oregon on the next touchdown, but to take the lead.

And that they did. On defence, junior linebacker Trevor Kemp forced a Western Oregon fumble at the Wolves’ 49-yard, which through a combination of the Western Oregon player having the ball slip out of his hands as he tried to recover the fumble and a series of bounces, saw the ball land on the three-yard line, which sophomore linebacker Gabe Lopes easily scooped up and ran in for a touchdown.

For only the second time this season, the Clan had the lead — the first time they achieved it after falling behind. They were up 13–12 after a failed two-point conversion.

But it seems that for this team, all good things must come to an end.

Western Oregon scored on both of its next two drives, to take the lead 27–13. By the time the day was done, the final score was 40–13. What looked like it could have been SFU’s first win wasn’t even SFU’s best loss. (Marginally, though: the 27-point loss was one more point than SFU’s previous 33–7 loss to Western Oregon.)

“We were what we are all year: we do some really good things and we do some things that hurt us,” said head coach Kelly Bates.

The most disappointing part of the game was that it was largely the defence that fell apart in the second half. After looking so full of promise all season, and after such a great first half — a legitimately great first half, not just relative to the rest of the game — they gave up 28 points. This was the second worst second-half performance all season.

“[Western Oregon] changed up some adjustments and picked up what we’re doing [in the second half], but you’ve also got to understand that our biggest issue is our size. I mean, we’ve got a 265-lb nose guard. And the team we’re playing against has two 320-lb guards,” said Bates. “We wear down, and that’s been our issue all year — we wear down and we make mental mistakes.”

While the offence put up only one score, it was their best game all year. The offensive line, which for much of the year just couldn’t give SFU’s quarterbacks much space to make plays, was much more effective tonight, with Bates saying, “They’ve done a better job than they’ve done all year.”

SENIOR’S DAY

For 14 seniors, it marked their last game.

“I’m just going to miss all the guys, so that’s kind of disappointing. I’ve built some pretty strong bonds with a lot of the players, so I’m going to miss them a lot,” said redshirt-senior linebacker Jordan Herdman. “Knowing it was my last game, I wanted to leave it all on the field, and I felt like I did that.”

With that, SFU is losing a lot of talent. Running back Ante Litre, who has been one of the most consistent players on offence, and Felix Gacusana on the offensive line, to name a few.

“We wear down, and that’s been our issue all year — we wear down and we make mental mistakes”

Of course, you can’t forget the Herdman brothers. Both Herdmans are likely to be impact CFL players. Despite being unranked on the initial CFL Draft 2017 rankings, some feel that Jordan could be a first overall pick in the CFL Draft.

“I’m very excited. I’m very, very excited to play at the next level. I’m looking at going into the NFL. I don’t know how far I’ll take it, but I’ll take it as far as I can go,” said Jordan, who will probably have a chance to try for an NFL free-agent contract.

But on a defence that made so much progress this season, will SFU be able to keep that momentum after losing the Herdmans?

“That’s the trick of college football, you’ve always got to plug holes,” said Bates. “We’re behind the eight ball to begin with, just based on the past history up here, the last four or five years. We’re trying to correct that. Are you ever going to replace the seniors you had up here? No, you’re not going to replace them just like that, just like we couldn’t replace the 14 from last year.

“It all starts with recruiting. That’s what we do 24/7, 365 days a year. We’ll lick our wounds tonight, deal with this game, and tomorrow it’s back to the grind and trying to get this team ready next year, trying to improve upon everything we’ve done this year,” he explained. “Obviously, we didn’t do what we wanted to do, but coming into this year I knew that it was probably going to be a step back. We have 37 new guys on the roster of 70 some guys, so that is what it is. Now that process continues and we continue to build and try to get bigger, faster, stronger, better.”

One area that you can see potential in is the receivers.

“I think our receiving core was excellent this year, I mean, I think we have tremendous potential. Gavin [Cobb], Rysen [John], and Nathanael Durkan, those three you got to see on the field here and there, and heck they’re young. They’re not as physically mature as the guys they’re playing against yet,” said Bates. “But you’re seeing glimpses of what they can become.”

Cobb was one of the best players to watch on the offence, consistently looking impressive, and putting up good numbers on the kick return, averaging 98.8 yards in the nine games he played in that role. John put up his first touchdown in Saturday’s game.

Redshirt Noah Samsen, Bates said, “might end up being the best of all of them.”

But for now, SFU is 0–10 on the season, with the second straight winless season, after losing the 23rd consecutive game dating back to 2014. This senior class has only seen five wins in their four seasons with the team.

It’s going to take a lot of hard work from both the players and the coaching staff to see that the next group of seniors gets some wins, and to build on this season.

IN OTHER NEWS: For the second year in a row, a Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC) football team has made the playoffs, as the Azusa Pacific Cougars were announced as having made the cut with an 8–0 conference record and 9–2 overall record. Prior to Humboldt State making it last year, a GNAC team hadn’t made the playoffs since the 2009 Central Washington Wildcats (featuring future BC Lions Adam Bighill). Time will tell if the Cougars follow the 2009 Wildcats and the 2015 Lumberjacks in winning in the first round, only to lose to Northwest Missouri State in the second round. Northwest Missouri State went on to win the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II national championship.

Clan women walk away from Patriot Duals with 7–1 record

0
Abby Lloyd (right) finished with an perfect 8–0 record.

The Clan women’s wrestling took to the mats this past weekend, travelling all the way to Kentucky to compete in the Patriot Duals with some of the best teams in the country. Led by men’s head wrestling coach Justin Abdou, the women’s team were able to come away with a 7–1 record over the weekend.

“The girls dominated their first seven duels, only coming up short against the defending national champions in the finals,” said coach Abdou.

The women’s team did just that, outscoring the other teams by a staggering margin of 223–88. Their only loss came to King University, who are currently ranked first in the nation. Strong efforts from the entire duel lineup allowed the Clan to be successful over the two-day tournament.

“Abby Lloyd, Dominique Parrish, and Nicole Depa all went 8–0 this weekend. We were down two starters and are looking forward to having them back in the lineup,” coach Abou said of the women’s individual performances.

Missing from action this weekend was returning national champion Mallory Velte (143-lbs weight class) and Francesca Giorgio (136), who placed third at last year’s national championships. Despite missing two key pieces, the Clan were still able to dominate with three freshman filling in for the starting lineup.

Coming off of a third place finish at last year’s national championships, the Clan are poised to make an impact late this year once again. Led by returning national champion Velte, they were ranked second in the year’s preseason rankings. With multiple returning national placers, the Clan are definitely a team that other schools should watch out for.

When asked about the team’s performance against top-ranked King University, coach Abdou said, “It was a good test to go up against a team like that this early to see how good we are. We have some work to do but if we stay healthy and continue to improve we can definitely have a shot to win come Nationals.”

The Patriot Duals are just one of the first major tournaments the Clan will be a part of this season. Despite it being an early tournament, the Clan has a lot of positives to take away from the tournament. Additionally, they know what they can work on to take down King University at the national championships this spring.

Following their strong start, the Clan will be active again this coming weekend in Spokane, Washington. After that, you can see them at home in West Gym on December 2 and 3.

$5 a Day Challenge: Food waste is killing the environment . . . and us

1

This is the fifth post in a week-long web series that documents Kevin Rey’s experiences living off of $5 worth of food a day. Check back daily for another post.

Have you ever experienced that awful moment where you realize the majority of your fridge is filled with expired food and/or sentient mould?

Cleaning up that kind of a mess is just the worst. It makes you ask yourself all sorts of strange questions, like “How am I going to get that into the compost box?” “Will I ever be able to get the smell out of the tupperware?” and “Would throwing out my entire fridge be simpler?”

One of the upsides of buying a tiny amount of food for the week is I’ll probably eat most of it before it goes bad.

That’s definitely not the case for Canada as a whole, though. A staggering amount of food is wasted every day by steps in production, or by spoiling at home after it’s been bought. This amounts to about $31 billion per year in Canada and has knock-on effects like increasing methane produced in landfills. I was at the Vancouver Zero Waste Conference earlier this month, where food waste was a prominent issue.

The good news is that at SFU, we’re doing a lot better than we used to be. Two years after implementing a new waste-sorting system, SFU realized its goal of diverting 70 percent of solid waste from landfills.

SFU’s student environmental group Embark has also been leading the charge when it comes to preventing food waste. Along with lobbying SFU about reducing waste, they have been running a food rescue program that collects donated end-of-life produce from Nesters Market and hands it out by donation in Blusson Hall.

I’ve actually known about the food rescue program for a little while, so I gambled on there being some fruit and vegetables I could take home. For my hard-earned $0, I was able to get a few apples, a bell pepper, a tomato, a small lime, and some alien-looking fruit thing apparently called a “persimmon.”

This kind of initiative is catching on globally. In France, grocery stores are selling misshapen produce at reduced prices so they don’t get thrown out, along with an outright ban on food ending up in landfills. Italy followed earlier this year with a similar law. In North America, consumers are putting pressure on retailers like Walmart to do the same.

Along with wasting less money on food, reducing food waste has social benefits too. Food banks are starting to warm up to the fact that they could get a whole lot more food on the cheap if they invested in mobile fridges and freezers to pick it up from grocery stores. This is a colossal amount of food. There’s even a “small” network of Little Caesers restaurants in the United States donating hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of food every year.

Earlier this year, Vancouver got its first Zero Waste Market, providing an outlet for Vancouverites who want to buy exactly how much food they need with little to no packaging. I think about this every time I go to the supermarket.

As if those weren’t good enough reasons, there is also a huge benefit to combatting climate change, as a recent study showed that managing waste better could reduce emissions from agriculture by 14 percent. Just like learning to cook, reducing food waste like this has basically no downsides (so long as the food is still safe to eat).

If this whole tirade is sounding a little familiar, that’s probably because it is: Last Week Tonight, hosted by John Oliver, had a similarly bulletproof argument for reducing food waste.

On a personal level, I really want to believe that after this $35-week, I’m going to be super conscious of how much food I buy. The most likely scenario is that I’ll be good for a week or two, and then impulsively buy a bunch of random vegetables because of a Food Network video.

I think my best strategy is going to be to replicate what Embark and others are doing, except out of my own kitchen. Rather than letting my fridge become a highly efficient penicillin farm, I’ll try offering my spare food to friends or colleagues, or I could even invite people over to help me cook and eat it all.

SFU hockey dominates Eastern Washington on road trip

0
Mathew Berry-Lamontagna had one goal and four assists for five points over the two games.

A total of 27–3 looks like a football or basketball score — certainly not a hockey one. But that’s exactly how much the SFU hockey team has outscored the Eastern Washington Eagles in their past three games against them. After 10–1 drubbing on October 22, the Clan added 11 more this Saturday and six on Sunday, taking four out of a possible four points and catapulting to the top of the British Columbia Intercollegiate Hockey League (BCIHL) standings, for the time being.

“Anytime you get two wins it’s always a success, and getting 17 goals in two games is pretty good too,” head coach Mark Coletta told The Peak. “Obviously Eastern Washington is banged up, and four of their top players are out. They battled hard, but our depth is definitely deep this year and our guys really played well this weekend and knew what was at stake.”

“I think this year we’ve got a well-balanced attack: all four of our lines can score.”

The first game was played on Saturday and SFU came roaring out, scoring 25 seconds in and never looking back. They had four in the first, three in the second, and another four in the third to make the final score 11–1. It was a score that Coletta had not experienced “since the first couple of years when I first started coaching with SFU.

“I think it was just due to a lot of our guys being hungry and wanted to prove [themselves],” said Coletta on what makes the offence tick against Eastern Washington. “Competition is tight with our guys internally, we have a lot of guys injured and a lot of guys trying to solidify their spots. Guys know competition and ice time is at a premium.”

The next game was a 6–1 win, with SFU not scoring any goals in the first. However, the floodgates opened in the second, as they added three goals in both the second and third periods. This game was once again dominated by the depth of SFU, as all six goals were scored by different players. It’s a good sign for the team, as in previous years they’ve lacked that scoring depth.

“I think any good team will tell you that you can’t rely on one line, sometimes that line gets shut down. We’ve had that problem the last couple of years. Always relying on Jono’s line a couple of years back, and [we] didn’t have any secondary scoring. If they were shut down, we were shut down as an offence as well. I think this year we’ve got a well-balanced attack: all four of our lines can score.”

Jordan Liem and Lyndon Stanwood split the starts over the weekend again, both allowing only one goal. It’s not a full-blown goalie controversy yet, but with both of them playing so well, it’s going to make it tough to choose between the two in the upcoming games.

“I don’t think there is any controversy, I just think we’ll just roll with it for the rest of the first semester,” said Coletta on the situation. “Depending on if it’s a real, stellar, outstanding performance where we have no doubt but to give whoever it is the next game. [. . .] We’ll just take it one game at a time as a coaching staff.”

Next up for SFU is a game against Trinity Western this Friday, a team with whom the Clan has traditionally played very close games.

“Obviously it’s going to be a really tough matchup. They play us really well, we haven’t seen them this year during the regular season, and they definitely have a good bunch of recruits that came in. [. . .] Again, I think we’re going to have to make sure we are moving our feet and play that in-your-face style of hockey, with all four of our lines that can get up and down the ice. Team speed is something we preach and that’s something we’re going to have to keep building upon.”

SFU’s next home game is against Selkirk College on November 26. Puck drop is at 7 p.m. at Bill Copeland Sports Centre.

Who’s your SFSS sweetheart?

0

It’s that time of year again! What time of year you ask? Christmas? No way, you silly son of a pancake-headed fuck. It’s mid November and not Christmas, so please calm your holly-jolly erections. It’s byelection time! Time to be a responsible university student and give a shit about democracy — if only because they control the U-Pass (all hail our glorious U-Pass).

While you should definitely use your big university brain to decide who you’ll support in the SFSS byelection, you should listen your thrumming heart to decide which SFSS cutie you want to get to know better. “ I want to get to know the real you. . . beyond your policies on Build SFU. . . I want to build a little bit of S-F-YOU in my heart!”


Dreamy Deepak

Deepak is nervous, bashful, and eager to please.

He’s a little rough around the edges and definitely does that kind of sad-puppy-dog shit you hate (he hates being in the doghouse and out of the SFSS house) but he really means well and his big eyes will leave your heart fluttering.

While he may not be the most confident guy in the room, he’s honest (to a fault) and just desperately wants to win your heart. If he seems distant at first, that’s ok — he’s doesn’t fully understand the pressure of a relationship (nor the SFSS by-laws) but he’ll come back and woo you way harder than you ever thought possible.

Dream date: Ordering pizza and curling up for a movie on Netflix. After an hour, he’ll work up the courage to hold your hand.

Turn-offs: Expectations. Questions about responsibilities? No thank you.

Dashing Darien

Darien is definitely the bad boy and outsider of the candidates. He’s the Ferris Buller of the trio — a real wise guy ready to whisk you off into a series of hijinks and daring (darien-ing) action ; it’s all in the name, baby. (Your mom wouldn’t approve of him nor his sensual eyebrows, but you live on the edge of danger and ma can’t make all of your dick decisions.)

Behind closed doors though, you can peel the onion that is Lechner’s hard exterior and discover the sweet inexperienced softie beneath his surface of large claims. He may not be everyone’s first choice, but you want to give him a chance since nothing else has worked so far.
This cutie will be as transparent as possible with his feelings for you, whispering sweet nothings into your ear and all the false promises all hopeless romantics love to hear (i.e  attempting to defer the loan of the Build SFU fees).

Dream date: A drive-in movie on his motorcycle, followed by an angry makeout session behind a dumpster. Don’t get distracted by his politics and just enjoy the danger. (Although, he really should be taking a stance on the raccoon problem, because it looks like it’s not just you two who are getting frisky behind the dumpster.)

Turn offs: Lechner’s all about building trust and compassion, but for the love god don’t Build SFU!

Lovely Larissa

Larissa would make your parents proud.

Her grades are good, her hair is impeccable, and she always opens the door for you. Chivalry may be dead, but Larissa’s alive and well, and she’s ready to show you the finer things in life — at the expense of your bank account (by-elections are pricey shit, girl!).

While she’s self-sufficient and never clingy, it can be hard to get her to relax and take her shoes off. Guess you’ll have to take them off for her.

Dream date: A night on the town dressed to impress. You share a bottle of Merlot in the park and watch the city lights twinkle.

Turn offs: Anything dirty. (Like the policies of the SFSS)