Home Blog Page 1279

Horoscopes: May 6th, 2013

0

By Gary Lim

Aries (March 21 – April 20)
Mercury is in your sign this week. Also your drinking water.
Taurus (April 21 – May 21)
It’s not a good idea to make any big purchases this week. So if you were thinking of buying an aircraft carrier or island nation put it off a week, okay?
Gemini (May 22 – June 21)
You understand that to move ahead in the world you need to “play the game”, but not once did you think that game would be strip backgammon.
Cancer (June 22 – July 22)
Irony strikes this week when you’re crushed to death by a safe.
Leo (July 23 – August 22)
Lightning never strikes twice but a downed power cable is surprisingly accurate.
Virgo (August 23 – Sept. 23)
You develop a new fetish this week, after autocorrect won’t stop changing the fucks in your sexts into ducks.
Libra (Sept. 24 – Oct. 23)
You’ve done all you can, now your ball is in their court as to whether the jury convicts you for public indecency.
Scorpio (Oct. 24 – Nov. 22)
A cruel twist of fate this week causes you to lose your phone. Meanwhile, a cruel twist of lime helps improve the flavor of your salsa.
Sagittarius (Nov. 23 – Dec. 21)
The stars indicate that there’s no need to worry about your check engine light. Its working fine, your engine however is about to burst into flame.
Capricorn (Dec. 22 – Jan. 20)
QUICK! DUCK! Did it work? I guess you aren’t reading this horoscope at the right time then. Try again later.
Aquarius (Jan. 21 – Feb. 19)
The cosmic forces that dictate the Universe are giving Aquarius the week off. Try not to die.
Pisces (Feb. 20 – March 20)
You know what they say, you can lead a horse to water but after seven drowned horses you may want to consult a professional horse waterer.

A Practical Guide to Icebreaker Games

0

By Brad McLeod

Well, it’s the start of new semester and that can only mean several things! One of those things is playing a hell of a lot of Icebreaker Games, your first opportunity of the semester to introduce yourself to the people who over the next 13 weeks might just become some of your closest acquaintances!

These games can be tough though, so it’s important for you to know how to conduct yourself properly. Remember: the impression you make here is how your peers will think of you for the entire remainder of the first class! (After that they’ll go back to judging you based on your looks like the rest of the world)

Anyways, here’s a basic guide to some of the most important things to remember in order to make your icebreaker introduction memorable this week.

1. Attend Class

This is definitely the most difficult step but if you want to do a good job in your icebreaker games, you’re probably going to have to actually show up to the first week of class. I know it’s pointless and they’ll just go over everything again next week, but as famous nervous person Woody Allen once said “showing up is 80 per cent of success.”*

*This statement should not be confused with “showing up will get you 80 per cent, success!” which I learned the hard way on my English 203 final exam last semester.

2. Pretend to be Interesting

No matter what icebreaker game you’re doing, you will almost always be asked to say something interesting about yourself. This can be very challenging since you are probably a very boring person, but just remember that the phrase “I’d like to say more but I promised Barack that I wouldn’t” can make any boring old male strip-club story more interesting.

3. Always One Up the Person Beside You

While being yourself is important in an ice breaker game, if you really want to be remembered, you are going to have to be better than everyone else. So, if the class is going around the room each saying what one thing they would bring with them to a desert island and the person next to you says “well I’d probably bring my iPod because I love music,” you have to take it up a notch and say “well I’d probably bring my iPhone because I love music too, but I’m richer than you… plus I could use it to call The Rolling Stones who are friends of mine.”

4. Lie as Often as Possible

This should be pretty obvious, but if you don’t already constantly lie in your everyday life, you should at least do it during an icebreaker game. “Two truths and a lie” is always much more difficult than “Two lies and a third more ridiculous lie.”

5. Pretend to Not be a Horrible Racist

This one might not be quite as obvious as some of the others, but unlike most social situations, racism is actually frowned upon during ice breaker games. I know it can be very tempting if you have to introduce a fellow student to the class, to comment on their inferior bone structure but you should probably be advised to stick to just describing their hobbies, goals and body odor.

 

5 Free Interesting Facts about Yourself

– I was the inspiration for Roseanne Barr’s character on the ABC sitcom Roseanne

– I can solve a Rubik’s Cube in under five hours

– I was the one who came up with the idea for peanut butter

– I can name every US state capital except Olympia

– I have the same birthday as Abraham Lincoln: February 12th, 1809

SFU professor awarded $150,000 for sea otter research

0


Otter Research-Mike Baird-Flickr

Dr. Anne Salomon to explore the decline of coastal shellfish and rebound in kelp forests

By Kristina Charania
Photos by Mike Baird

Along some shorelines and oceans bordering the Alaskan and British Columbian coasts, shellfish numbers are quickly dwindling as sea otters, once listed as endangered, continue to recover and consume them. Though these sea otters are a natural part of temperate coastal ecosystems, their population recovery and growth leaves few shellfish behind for the First Nations people that rely on these invertebrates as a source of food and livelihood.

Marine ecologist Dr. Anne Salomon has recently been awarded a $150,000 Pew Fellowship for a collaborative investigation on the issue. Salomon has been involved in marine conservation issues for over 12 years and continues to teach courses in applied ecology at Simon Fraser University, direct the university’s Coastal Marine Ecology and Conservation Lab, and function as a primary investigator with SFU’s  Hakai Network for Coastal People, Ecosystems and Management.

“I was shaking in my boots when I was nominated for this award because I didn’t think there was any way I’d receive it. In my field, it’s a huge honour to receive a Pew Fellowship, and as a young graduate student, it’s something that I hoped I would earn one day,” said Salomon. “I feel very humbled about this whole experience.”

Each year, the Pew Fellows Program in Marine Conservation selects five outstanding scientists from around the world who are tackling the challenges confronting the world’s oceans through interdisciplinary research projects. With her Pew Fellowship, Salomon will examine sea otter recovery and bring academics, First Nations Elders, and resource managers together to analyze the past and present plights of local marine ecosystems, blend western science and traditional knowledge, and create viable solutions for aquatic environments in the future

“I think the reason I was selected for this award is because of the strong and productive partnerships I’ve had with coastal First Nations people in Alaska,” said Salomon.

“Our team is dedicated to really listening and working with coastal communities to provide solutions for issues that they feel are important to their coastal ecosystems, their societies, and to their people.”

The struggles created by shellfish declines are multi-faceted and long-standing in Alaskan and British Columbian First Nations history. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, sea otters were hunted to near extinction and became locally eliminated from coastal oceans. In the absence of this primary reef predator, shellfish became abundant in coastal communities and fed on kelp beds in these ecosystems. The recovery of sea otter populations in the 1950’s in south central Alaska turned formerly lone otters into rafts of over thirty individuals, and kelp beds grew freely at the expense of fewer shellfish due to sea otter consumption.

“Sea otters are a keystone species, which means that one individual sea otter has a disproportionate effect on an ecosystem,” explained Salomon. “Only a few of them are needed to trigger a large impact, and when you start to see shellfish declines like that in your coastal refrigerator, you become very worried.”

Through work with two Sugpiaq native tribes, Salomon and her partners documented the serial decline of shellfish fisheries as sea otter populations recovered and fishing by humans intensified and became more concentrated.

Having observed this pattern in Alaska, Salomon knew the same pattern had been reported by scientists working on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Sea otter recovery, shellfish decline, and kelp forest expansion had also been observed by the Heiltsuk on BC’s central coast where sea otters began recovering in the late 1980s and the Nuu-chah-nulth on the west coast of Vancouver Island, where sea otters were intentionally reintroduced in the early 1970s.

“If you don’t know anything about the past, you would have no idea that Vancouver once had an old growth forest and that there were massive cedars here,” said Salomon. “But, if you know something about the past, you can assess the magnitude of change from today and identify baselines that give you targets to shoot for when it comes to recovery.

“By collaborating with the Haida who have not yet experienced any sea otter recovery, different first nations knowledge holders like the Heiltsuk, Nuu-chah-nulth, and Sugpiaq who are experiencing different stages of sea otter recovery, and marine ecologists and archaeologists who’ve studied sea otter effects over time, we essentially have a crystal ball into the past and the future,” Salomon continued.

Haida matriarch Barb Wilson and Sugpiaq seal hunter Nicolas Tanape Sr. will act as Salomon’s cultural guides, ensuring that her group follows each First Nations’ community protocols as they begin their research synthesis.

Wilson described that her ancestors explained that sea otters were not only kept at low numbers close to native villages, but special focus was placed on hunting males, who segregate themselves from females into their own raft of otters. Because sea otters feast on shellfish, First Nations groups had several forms of traditional management to control the effects of this predator.

“The reason I found this so interesting is because there is strong evidence that male sea otters are responsible for expanding their territory or ranges. If you can control the male rafts, you can partially control where in space sea otters hang out,” says Salomon. “This is just one little gem that Barb Wilson shared with me that I think are the kinds of gems that will arise when we bring everyone together.”

Two marine spatial planning processes, including one joint provincial and First Nations process, are currently in progress in BC. Salomon hopes her findings will further First Nations contributions to scientific research and allow these groups to voice their concerns on choices affecting their native homes. “Canadian First Nations have a constitutional right to be involved in cooperative decision making,” said Salomon.

Local First Nations artists will also attend Salomon’s meetings with policy makers and other workshops with First Nations’ people to document the process and outcomes of each event through art.

“Scientists are typically poor communicators to the public, so another goal here is to communicate this collaborative science to everybody, including the public and policy makers,” said Salomon. “People learn and listen with their eyes, nose, and ears, so I think this is a way to capture the attention and interest of people far beyond our scientific meta-analyses that are dry and hard to communicate to the public.”

“When sea otters come back, it catalyses controversy and ignites people’s emotions because people are invested in these issues,” Salomon concluded.

“This project truly is about bringing people and scientists together to inform marine policies to balance the needs of people and nature.”

University Briefs

0

By Alison Roach

Wordless storybooks expose toddlers to richer language

Researchers at the University of Waterloo have recently found that children hear more complex language from their parents when they are read a storybook with only pictures, compared to a book with pictures and vocabulary. The findings, which were published in the latest issue of the journal First Language, showed that mothers especially would use more complex sentences and language while reading a book with only pictures as opposed to a book with its own built-in narrative. “These findings show that reading pictures books with kids exposes them to the kind of talk that is really important for children to hear,” said study author Professor Daniela O’Neill.

With files from University of Waterloo Communication & Public Affairs

U of T honours gay-straight alliances

Late last month, 220 advocates of sexual diverstiy education gathered for the first annual Bonham Centre Awards Gala at the University of Toronto’s University College. The gala honoured University College alumnus Stephen Lewis, a longtime HIV/AIDS crusader; Bent on Change, a gay-straight alliance group; and best-selling author Dan Savage, the co-founder of the It Gets Better campaign, a project to help prevent suicide among LGBT youth. Of the inaugural event, Bonham Centre founding director Professor David Rayside commented, “Now more than ever, we want to help our students and the broader community understand what genuine inclusivity means.”

With files from University of Toronto News

Saying no to salt

The University of Saskatchewan department of food and bioproduct sciences has launched an attempt to lower Canadians’ salt consumption by aiming at its two biggest sources: bread and processed meats. A research team is currently working with industry to reduce the amount of salt used in making bread and baked goods, problematic because reducing it can result in sticky dough that doesn’t work well with equipement. Another team is targeting salt in meats, made difficult because salt is used to preserve meats and create texture. Health Canada has announced that salt intake must come down by 2016.

With files from the University of Saskatchewan News Releases

UVic recognized for top scientific performance

The University of Victoria has been placed in the top one per cent of universities in the world for its scientific impact and its involvement in scientific collaboration, according to the Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology rankings. The prestigious rankings measured the scientific performance of 500 major universities worldwide. UVic is the top-ranked Canadian university without a medical school, and the fifth overall in the country. The university also had the highest ranking in Canada for international collaboration.

With files from University of  Victoria Campus News

Election 2013: Informing your vote

0

Provincial Election

 

A breakdown of current political issues, candidates, and party policies, just in time for May 14

By Leah Bjornson
Photos by Stephen Rees, Stephen Hui, Kris Krug

Democratic participation in BC has steadily declined over the last few decades, dropping to the point where only 55 per cent of the 2.9 million registered voters cast a ballot in 2009. Of that statistic, the lowest registration rates are for young voters.

In a poll conducted by Elections BC in 2010, it was found that on average, only one-third, 34 per cent, of the 20-24 year old group cast a ballot in the three Provincial elections that have taken place since 2001. However, in the 18 to 19 year old age range, three out of every five registered voters cast a ballot. The fact that this cohort had a higher percentage of votes cast than the BC average provides a glimmer of hope for increased democratic participation by BC’s younger generation.

But does a vote really matter if it is not informed? To help you make it to the ballot box, and to make a thoughtful, informed decision, The Peak has put together a comprehensive guide to leadership candidates and the political issues in BC today.

Leadership Candidates

Adrian Dix 

Some might have been surprised when Adrian Dix was elected the leader of the BC New Democrats in April 2011, considering his involvement in a scandal which ended the leadership of once-premier Glen Clark. The controversy involved charges that Clark had approved his neighbour’s casino application in return for renovations to his home. Dix, who was then chief of staff to Premier Clark, was fired by the premier after it was revealed that he’d falsely backdated a memo in an effort to protect Clark.

Dix has since expressed regret for his actions, telling press at a conference in 2011, “I take responsibility for my mistakes. I always have . . . I own them.”

Although Dix was not involved in politics immediately following the incident, he re-entered the political arena and was elected as an MLA in 2005. Since then, Dix’s policies have displayed a commitment to quality public education as well as readiness to challenge current policies. Over the past few years, Dix has lead a coalition that saved certain East Vancouver schools from being closed and was also the executive director for Canadian Parents for French, BC-Yukon Branch, a non-profit organization that promoted language education. More recently, Dix led the NDP’s successful fight against the HST.

Adrian Dix’s proposed plans for the future include a plan for health reform that would add $254 million in spending over three years. Dix has also floated the idea of selling BC Place, suggesting that the NDP government would prefer to spend the stadium’s predicted operational losses of almost $60 million over the next three years on hospitals or social programs.

Christy Clark 

The BC Liberals have exalted our current Premier as a politician dedicated to “putting families first, defending and creating jobs, and creating a more open government” in BC. However, Christy Clark’s successes over the past two years have been undercut with recent falling poll numbers, suggesting this Premier’s time may be up.

Clark became the Premier of BC in 2011 after she won the BC Liberal Party’s leadership election on February 26, 2011. First elected to the legislature as an MLA in 1996 and working as the Minister of Education and Deputy Premier from 2001 to 2005, Clark has since demonstrated a commitment to a consistent, focused platform centred around jobs, families, and open government.

Such policies include the BC Jobs Plan (“Canada Starts Here”) which is comprised of a package of policies meant to encourage the creation and protection of BC jobs by taking a leadership position federally and promoting fiscal prudence. In recent years, the provincial government under Clark has increased the minimum wage and cancelled the training wage, created the Family Day holiday, and released reviews of government companies like BC Hydro and Community Living BC. In response to criticisms of overspending, Clark counters that she hopes to have a debt-free BC in 15 years.

Clark’s Premiership has been plagued by political controversial decisions like the adoption of the HST as well as personal critiques, the most recent of which concerned allegations of her running a red light while driving her 11-year-old son Hamish to hockey practice. Further criticism has surfaced as to whether or not voters can judge the Liberals based on Clark’s two years as leader, or whether the problems of the past 12 years should be given more thought. Whatever the cause, the Liberal’s poll numbers are trailing the NDP’s by 14 points, up from trailing by 17 points since the last Angus Reid poll in April.

Jane Sterk

The Green Party leader began her career, not in politics, but as a teacher with the Edmonton Public Schools, teaching at the University of Alberta, Grant MacEwen College, and University Canada West in Victoria. Jane Sterk first became involved in politics when she ran as a federal candidate in 2004 and as a provincial candidate in 2005, becoming a councillor in the Township of Esquimalt from 2005 to 2008.

Since 2007, Sterk has led the Green Party of BC with a focus on strengthening internal party structure, implementing disciplined financial controls and retiring the party’s long-term debt while working actively for sustainability initiatives.

As an Esquimalt councillor, Sterk pursued several environmental policy shifts, including the adoption of an urban agriculture resolution, a community garden by-law, a pesticide by-law, and the creation of a pedestrian charter. Although the BC Green Party is similarly focussed on environmental issues, Sterk has worked this election to show that the Greens are more than a one-issue party. Through decentralization, sustainable economic policies, and accountable democracy that responds to the wishes of British Columbians, the Greens are attempting to shift from an environmental alternative to become a legitimate option for BC voters.

John Cummins

For 18 years, Conservative Party Leader John Cummins has represented British Columbians throughout the evolution of Canada’s conservative movement first as a Reformer, Canadian Alliance, and finally as a Conservative MP. During the Leadership debate on Monday, April 29th, Cummins presented himself as a third and better option than NDP and Liberals. On the BC Conservatives’ website, Cummins is advertised as the better choice between “transparency and deception”, “listening and arrogance”, “government of the people and a government of special interests”, and between “common sense and political correctness”.

If elected, Cummins has pledged to pursue certain policies which promote fiscal austerity while bringing jobs back to British Columbians. The Conservatives plan to achieve this goal by eliminating the Carbon Tax and the province’s debt, ensuring a re-balance between urban and rural British Columbia in order to make northern and remote regions of the province attractive to newcomers, developing the province’s natural resource wealth, and giving young British Columbians the first opportunity to fill jobs that are now being taken by temporary foreign workers. In addition to these goals for job creation and economic stability, the Conservatives have been sure to address the need for a strong social safety net “for those who truly need assistance.”

Election Issues

The Economy and Job Creation

The economy and job creation have been a focus for all parties this election, who all propose different solutions to put the province on track to becoming a Canadian economic leader.

The Liberals have actively promoted job creation over the last couple of years through the BC Jobs Plan, “Canada Works Here.” This plan has been the focus of Clark’s administration, and attempts to put BC in first or second place in Canada for job creation and economic development by 2015. Highlighting the importance of the BC Jobs Plan when it was first implemented in 2011, Premier Clark said, “Our goal is to be the economic engine of Canada because by creating jobs you create strong families and government has the money to pay for the healthcare and education we all want.”

The NDP sees the problem as one of skill shortage. Their solution is in post-secondary education and skills training. The party plans to improve access to job training by providing $100 million in needs-based, non-repayable student grants. When asked how his party might fund such a large project, Dix replied, “It will be funded by reinstating the minimum tax on large banks.”

The Conservatives have proposed three keys for success in this area: first, through high-wage job creation; second, by investing in the province’s natural resource development; and third, through investment in skills training and apprenticeships.

The Green Party proposed a complete shift from the current Liberal government’s economic platform, pointing to the deficits created by the current economic model as the reason. According to Richard Hosein, media contact for the Green Party of BC, “Our current economic model leaves us with fiscal, social and ecological deficits.” The Greens believe, BC must transition from an economy that depends on growth and consumption to one that promotes sustainability.

The Enbridge Northern Gateway

Much debate has centered on the Enbridge Northern Gateway project, a plan which involves constructing a crude oil and liquids pipeline from Alberta to British Columbia. The project would create 217 jobs, but has raised concerns as to its environmental, economic, social and cultural risks.

The Liberals have been criticised for their non-committal reaction to the pipeline project. Clark recently defined the government’s position as “committed to economic development that is balanced with environmental protection” and in favour of environmental review of the Enbridge development. However, the Liberals do support pipelines in BC if they meet necessary criteria and prove to be beneficial to the community as a whole. Clark said last year when the government outlined its heavy oil pipeline requirements, “We need to combine environmental safety with our fair share of fiscal and economic benefits.”

Both the NDP and the Green Party have declared their fervent opposition to the pipeline, although Adrian Dix has been criticised for changing his opinion on the pipeline in the past months. Rob Fleming, NDP environment critic, recently was quoted as saying, “New Democrats have taken a principled stand against the Enbridge pipeline. We will ensure B.C. voices are heard and B.C. interests are protected with a “made in B.C.”environmental assessment.” The Green Party echoes the NDP’s environmental concerns, and adds that, if created, the pipeline would actually ruin more jobs across Canada in the fisheries and tourism than it would create.

The Conservatives have pledged their full support for the project, “provided that it passes all necessary environmental reviews” according to Kristy Fredericks, Director of Policy, Research and Communications for the BC Conservatives as quoted in Darpan Magazine. Cummins expressed his belief that the economic benefits of the project outweigh the environmental concerns, and that the project should be implemented as soon as possible.

The Justice System

Engaged citizens have also expressed their concerns over BC’s justice system. The courts experience large delays, exemplified by the fact that over 2,500 cases have been open for at least 14 months without being decided upon. To alleviate these backlogs, the different parties are proposing solutions to fix our flawed justice system.

The Liberals are proposing a 10-point plan to fix the current problem. The plan includes the creation of a Justice and Public Safety Council, a new scheduling system, and increased use of technology to increase the courts’ efficiency. However, support for the Liberals in the justice sector has fallen sharply, especially since the 2011 Stanley Cup Riots.

The Conservatives have pledged to increase funding to the courts, as they claim that the system has suffered a lack of resources over the last decade. The party hopes that increased numbers of judges, sheriffs, and other officials will increase the expediency of the courts and result in “timely justice.”

Rather than focusing on improving the justice process, the Green Party believes that the justice system would be best improved by making communities safer through the establishment of a provincial police force, a restorative justice program, and an independent police complaints system.

The NDP’s platform on the justice system promises to strengthen access to justice and improve community safety by putting millions in legal aid and crime prevention and restorative justice programs.

Conclusion

No matter whether you are a student or a seasoned voter, this upcoming Provincial Election has provided British Columbians with much to think about when casting their ballots. Will the Liberals be elected on their platform of support for families, job creation, and fiscal prudence, continuing their history of twelve straight years in office? Or is it time for the NDP, who even after Christy Clark’s impressive composure in the April 29th Leadership Debate have overtaken the Liberals in the polls because of their focus on social spending, skills training, and support for the environment? It could even be that British Columbians have grown tired of these two dominant parties, and might resort to the sustainability-driven Greens or the fiscally responsible Conservatives.

As it stands now, Angus Reid polls point to an NDP victory of 41%, with the Liberals polling 34% of the vote and the Greens and Conservatives coming in with 12% and 10%, respectively. Such an election would result in a huge NDP majority government, according to UBC Prediction Markets. While there is still time for the Liberals, Greens, and Conservatives to gain ground, there are only two weeks left before the election on May 14th.

For SFU students looking to vote, information regarding registration and voting locations can be found on www.elections.bc.ca.

Remembering Boston

0

SFU professor was minutes from reaching the Boston Marathon finish line when the bombs went off

By Kristina Charania
Photos by Christopher Penn

On an average day on Boylston Street in Boston, Massachusetts, the air hums with conversation, the rustling of shopping bags and take-home restaurant containers, and the clicking of swaying metal flower baskets hanging from old-style lampposts. At first glance, Boylston Street looks much like parts of West Vancouver and Gastown.

On April 15th at 2:50pm, the scene was much different. After the explosion of two bombs set off thirteen seconds apart — the first within moments of the finish line — the area smelled like a mixture of fresh fireworks and smoke, according to SFU psychology professor Rachel Fouladi. She was minutes away from the Boston Marathon finish line when she heard the blasts, still nestled amongst nearly 5,700 other runners yet to complete the race.

“The police didn’t automatically recognize what happened,” Fouladi said. “They were walking a bit slowly, and one officer was reaching for his communication device. It’s a difficult sound to recognize at first — how often do we hear a bomb go off?”

Fouladi said she stuck to positive thoughts as she continued to run, with no one immediately stopping her and no visual indication of what had occurred. “It certainly did cross my mind that the explosion was a bomb. But, I thought, it could have also been an accident, a blast at a construction site, bleachers falling — of course, I had hoped not — or the scaffolding archway for photographers near the finish line.”

Spectators and volunteers then stopped her and 25 other runners between the intersections closest to the bombing sites. If they had been even a second later in stopping her, Fouladi would have found herself amidst the chaos and destruction created by the packed pressure-cooker bombs.

After the scramble to borrow spectator’s cell phones and send text messages over a poor connection, groups of on-foot enforcement, police on bicycles, and a SWAT car rushed towards Boylston Street. Fouladi’s group was instructed to evacuate away from the bomb sites a few minutes later.

Although she is now safe and sound in Vancouver, Fouladi encourages increased marathon participation after witnessing the warmth and kindness of other participants in Boston. It’s crucial, she notes, that people continue to put one foot in front of the other to demonstrate the power of community engagement.

“These are beliefs I take to heart. I try my best to encourage other people to discover for themselves what I’ve discovered through marathon running,” she says. Fouladi herself progressed from relaxed interval training to running a half marathon in 2007.

“At this race, I even met a fellow running his 19th Boston Marathon. He had a little pot belly, and by the look of him you’d never have guessed he was a runner. People of all ages came from a variety of places like North America, Colombia, Japan, and Scotland — everywhere. Many repeat participants get to know each other and recognize people that they see at these races and ask, ‘How have you been this past year? What other races have you run this year? Is your foot feeling okay now?’”

With hundreds of volunteers and 42 kilometres of clapping and cheering spectators, much of the marathon’s spirit also comes from those people who selflessly administer race packs and run aid stations whether they take part in the race themselves or not. “Kids even offer the runners cut oranges, liquorice sticks, gummy bears, water — all sorts of items. If you’re thirsty as you run, there’s probably somebody along the route that will offer you something,” she says. “It’s really sweet. All of these actions are so innocent and positive, so it makes me extremely sad that these bombings happened.”

Besides organizing SFU’s Terry Fox Run and hosting informal run groups on a weekly basis, after her experience in Boston, Fouladi invited the community to join her for a run on the university’s Burnaby on a rainy Sunday afternoon. A total of eleven runners participated, including three children, the head of the university’s Health and Counselling office, a Lower Mainland resident, and two SFU students. One student brought her father along, who had participated in the Boston Marathon in 2011.

“She had been standing where the bombs went off this year when she had gone to support her father two years ago. For them, it had also been a close call. If they had been there this year instead, they would have experienced what I and others had experienced,” said Fouladi.

After 45 minutes of running around the track through a mixture of hail and snow, the runners stopped to change direction at 2:50pm — the time of Boston bombing — and ran silently for ten minutes in recognition of others’ sorrow and as a sign that people should not stop running or living their everyday lives.

“Even for those people who emailed me and couldn’t come to run because of other obligations, they were still thinking of us,” said Fouladi. “That’s another great thing. Not running with us doesn’t actually mean that you aren’t participating at all. You’re still there in spirit.”

SuperFunUniversity! #1

0

supersized

By Brad McLeod

Moe answers not delivered

3

A response to his previous article “Ask Questions, Get Moe Answers”

By Isaac Louie

Dear Moe,

On the last article you wrote: “If you claim that just because not enough people voted, the election process is somehow flawed, or that the legitimization of the incoming directors should be questioned, then you are directly negating and undermining democracy and the time and effort of those active members of our community that actually voted in the last election.”

Moe, this is exactly what democracy is about — questioning decisions to gain a better understanding of issues. I read Joe’s article as addressing the broader concern of student apathy, and relating your vote score (which you were the first to bring up), does not mean you get to stop listening to these voices of criticism. 23 per cent voter turnout out of 25,000 students equals 5,750 students. Of those who voted, only 1,962 students voted for you, or 34 per cent of all voters in this election. Thus, those votes don’t actually represent the voting majority in this election, as 431 students voted no and the other 3,357 students spoiled the ballot.

I think the main point in all of this dialogue (Facebook comments, Peak articles, and Peak article comments) is that the SFSS executive continues to approach student issues in a top-down approach by telling us students that this society is “yours” and to “take it back.” This communicates a fundamental separation of the Board from the rest of the student body in an “us-versus-them” mentality.

I hope I speak on behalf of most students when I say that this student society is ours and that our voices and concerns need to be heard and acted upon by the executive. We need to be respected by them, as it is your role to serve us students, and not for you to boast about your votes.

Further, the disqualification of Alia Ali goes to show how troubled the state of our student politics is if people can run for board while knowingly ineligible.

I want to let you know that I am a student who has attended Board meetings, SFSS committee meetings, and Forum meetings only to have my concerns fall on deaf ears. SFPIRG is still without a lease from the SFSS, even after the Space and Oversight Committee violated SFSS policy to recommend the termination of the lease without consultation (which has been renewed and re-negotiated every time over the last 30+ years).

A room in the Women’s Centre all-gender space is still mouldy and has posed a health hazard for over two years. In the time since this has been brought to the board’s notice (two years ago), we have seen the creation of a Build SFU space (which is empty most of the time). What message does this send? You were present at the meeting in which the Women’s Centre Collective brought that up, so I ask you now, when is that going to be fixed?

This call for student accountability is nothing new. Remember the Annual General Meeting when the Yoga Club called on the executive board for more transparency and accountability? I do. We need better behaviour from our board and more than kind thanks for our input. We need fortitudinous action.

Prevalence of abortion undermines a mother’s rights

1

WEB-Genocide Awareness-Alison Roach

A response to the criticisms against the Genocide Awareness Project

By Suzana Kovacic
Photos by Alison Roach

A few years ago, I received a distressed phone call from a friend. She had just found out that she was pregnant.  Her doctor strongly advised abortion because of an abdominal x-ray he had ordered to assess the cause of her abdominal discomfort.  He had failed to recognize that her symptoms may be due to pregnancy and recommended abortion because of the x-ray dose her baby had received at such an early stage in pregnancy.  It would seem her doctor recognized he could be held liable for any harm caused to the unborn child due to his failure to first determine if his patient was pregnant. Abortion would cover up his mistake and protect him from potential litigation.  Abortion, however, was not what his patient wanted or needed. I helped my friend find a different doctor who treated both mom and unborn baby as equal patients, and my friend went on to deliver a healthy baby girl.

I was reminded of the difficulties facing pregnant mothers when witnessing some of the recent responses to the Genocide Awareness Project by SFU Lifeline. Opponents seem to believe restrictions on abortion undermine women’s rights. I am now seven months pregnant and like my friend, have seen how the prevalence of abortion undermines a mother’s rights. The general acceptance of abortion by society and by large segments of the medical profession has created a culture which limits a mother’s choice to receive optimal care for herself and her child during pregnancy.

Too often, mothers facing a pregnancy crisis are steered towards abortion presumably because it is a cheaper, easier or a more convenient choice. Abortion, like any medical procedure, is never 100 per cent safe. While abortion is always lethal to the baby, abortion can also carry significant risks to the mom. The recent high-profile death of a New York mother following a botched 33-week abortion testifies to the risks, as do the numerous documented cases of mothers being taken from abortion clinics in ambulances following emergency complications.

Unrestricted legal access to abortion is based on the notion that legal abortion is safe, and illegal abortion is unsafe. A recent study examined the effect on maternal mortality following a ban in 1989 on therapeutic abortions in Chile. Instead of maternal mortality rates increasing as mothers turned to illegal abortion, the mortality rate decreased. Chile now has a lower maternal mortality rate than the US. The study attributed this decrease to delivery by skilled birth attendants, access to maternal healthcare services such as nutritional programs, and an increase in women’s educational levels.

Mothers and their unborn children deserve good medical care, not abortion. Direct abortion is never medically necessary to save the life of a mother. In order to understand this statement, it is necessary to first recognize there is a fundamental difference between abortion and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child.

A pregnant mother diagnosed with uterine cancer, for instance, can have her uterus removed in order to save her life. That the life-saving surgery results in the death of her unborn child is not the intent of the surgery. In the case of medical complications that arise after the unborn child has reached 22 weeks (the age of viability), the child is delivered prematurely to allow both mom and baby to be cared for. Restrictions on abortion do not affect the availability of care offered to mothers during pregnancy.

Pregnant mothers are vulnerable. Unrestricted access to abortion increases the vulnerability of mothers and their unborn children. Initiatives like the Genocide Awareness Project should be welcomed because they help us recognize that a pregnant woman is not one patient, but that mother and child are two equal patients who should each be afforded the greatest care medicine can provide.