Home Blog Page 1235

SFU Art Gallery has new “bathroom graffiti” exhibit, reports student who took wrong turn

1

Grafitti

BURNABY — According to Tim Burns — a student who must have taken a wrong turn somewhere on his way to the Art Gallery — there is a brand new exhibition that highlights the work of bathroom graffiti artist, as well as a significant tribute to sink fixtures and mirrors.

While SFU galleries’ spokespeople claim that their current featured display is of the work of Samuel Roy-Bois, an artist who, to their knowledge, was not primarily inspired by lavatories, Burns was thoroughly impressed by the work he saw on display, going as far as to say it was “the best work he’s ever seen at the gallery.”

Burns said the work he encountered was quite awe-inspiring and contained some of the most detailed penis sketches he’s ever seen. He also said that he was almost brought to tears by some of the poetry on display, particularly one entitled “Jaspreet is a fag” which was written by a literary genius with the pseudonym “your mom.”

While it seems pretty clear that Burns was just in one of the AQ’s nearby men’s washrooms and not the art gallery, he’s been promoting the exhibit enthusiastically with his only warning to potential visitors being not to use flash photography since fellow patrons take that very seriously and may eject you from the premises.

Words around Vancouver

1

WORD

At the end of September for nearly the past 20 years, lit lovers and word nerds from all backgrounds gather at Library Square for a free book and magazine festival. Streets are blocked off, large tents emerge, and a stage is erected at the corner of Robson and Homer.

Publishers, booksellers, authors, illustrators, literacy advocates, and performers of all kinds flock to the festival formerly known as The Word On The Street Vancouver.

This year, celebrating its renewal as Word Vancouver, the festival is better than ever. Best known among local literati as a one-day event on the last Sunday in September, the Vancouver team lengthened the festival in 2011 to span the weekend coinciding with Culture Days.

This year, the festival has five days of programming from Sept. 25 to 29, at various locations around Vancouver. Also, with only two episodes of unfavourable weather in 19 years, Word Vancouver has an excellent track record with the weather gods.

Wednesday, Sept. 25 features the kickoff event for the Automated Poetry Project at the recently opened secondhand bookstore, The Paper Hound. Word Vancouver just wrapped up a month-long crowdfunding campaign to convert old vending machines into poetry dispensers. They managed to raise more than half their intended goal and will be going ahead with the project, although it may be slightly modified due to budget.

NEWS-quotation marksit’s literally words on the street with nothing but a tent and a mic.”

Mariner Janes, poet

Festival attendees may be conflicted between multiple programs on Thursday: in addition to programming at the Carnegie, the Twisted Poets Literary Salon will be at the Cottage Bistro, and a cooking demo and book signing will be at Banyen Books & Sound.

Friday features a talk about stage and screenwriting at the Historic Joy Kogawa House, and Saturday has professional development workshops for writers at the central branch of the Vancouver Public Library on W Georgia St.

Wanda John-Kehewin, a 2011 graduate of The Writers’ Studio at SFU, says the poetry vending machines are something she’s personally looking forward to — she will be reading from her first book of poetry at the festival on Sunday in the Poetry Tent.

Her poetry is influenced by the lives of people. To say she finds inspiration in other people’s pain sounds callous, but she finds it is a “way to make a connection. Pain is universal; it doesn’t discriminate [between] those in a war torn country [or] people on a Reservation.”

John-Kehewin began writing seriously in 2008 after the Indian residential schools apology. She found herself drawn to global politics and social issues, drawing on events such as the earthquake in Japan or conflicts in the Gaza Strip. Her collection of poetry, In the Dog House, was published with Talonbooks this spring.

The sheer number of events may seem overwhelming, but that is exactly what poet Mariner Janes appreciates about the festival, “The setting is different from a formal reading, it’s literally words on the street with nothing but a tent and a mic. [Word Vancouver] showcases a lot of different authors.” Janes, who earned his BA and MA in English at SFU, will be reading from his first book of poetry, The Monument Cycles, on Sunday in the Poetry Tent.

The festival, being in various neighbourhoods around the city, gives attendees a chance to see different sides of Vancouver. Janes witnesses this daily while managing a mobile harm reduction unit in the downtown eastside.

“Moving around the city all day — walking, driving — allowed me to think about space and the people within the city.” Janes’ observations resulted in a collection of poetry framed around these themes, stemming from ideas about the role of monuments from a course at SFU.

Poetry seems to be a recurring theme at this year’s Word Vancouver, but there is something for everyone including children’s literature and storytelling, magazine talks, writing workshops, booths for local arts organizations, displays for literacy associations, and even musical performances. Of the festival, John-Kehewin says: “it’s free and all class statuses are welcome, it doesn’t matter your income level.”

Preamble

0

Junius Brutus Stearns' 1856 painting George Washington Addressing the Constitutional Convention.

 

The original preamble is as follows:

The purposes of the Society are educational and artistic, to wit:

a)   the publication of newspapers, magazines, papers, books and documents to take an active role in educational and artistic endeavors including, but not limited to, The Peak,

b)   the promotion of academic excellence and journalistic excellence, according to the Canadian University Press Statement of Principles and Code of Ethics, except that the Society shall not have the power to grant or confer a diploma or degree of literary, technical or scientific standing,

c)    the sponsoring of lectures, debates and all other activities designed to advance the purposes of the Society, students at universities throughout the world and the members of faculty and administration of those universities, and members of the journalistic profession,

d)   the awarding of prizes, scholarships, bursaries, medals, certificates or other suitable recognition of contributions made both by members and non-members to the purposes set out in Section 2.b.

The following problems have been identified with it:

  • It explicitly lists formats in which the Society may publish materials, but this list is profoundly outdated, not including references to any sort of electronic media.
  • It refers to the Canadian University Press Statement of Principles and Code of Ethics, which is not easily available. Additionally, the future of CUP and of The Peak’s relationship with it is very much in question.
  • It requires sponsorship of events and prizes that, in practice, are rarely organized.

The following text has been suggested as a revision:

The purposes of the Peak Publications Society are as follows:

  1. The Society shall publish material for the benefit of the SFU community in whatever forms it is able;

  2. The Society shall report on matters of import and interest to the membership; to provide a forum for discussion and debate of issues important to the SFU community and beyond, and to defend freedom of speech within that forum; and to provide a venue for original entertainment material for the membership;

  3. The Society shall maintain independence from editorial or financial pressure from any external agents; pursuant to this, editorial policies, advertising policies, staffing policies, and organizational structuring shall be decided within the organization, within the bounds of applicable law;

  4. The Society may sponsor events and prizes for the benefit of the SFU community;

  5. All officers and agents of the Society shall adhere to the Code of Ethics.

 

All publications of the society and all involved in their production shall adhere to the following Code of Ethics, which is intended as a minimum standard of conduct.

  1. Journalists shall strive for accuracy in their reporting at all times, and shall never misrepresent, falsify, or distort facts.

  2. Journalists shall seek all perspectives relevant to their topic, and the Society shall allow space for conflicting views.

  3. Journalists shall respect the confidence of sources and private documents, within the bounds of the law and freedom of the press.

  4. All writers and producers shall be aware of libel and copyright laws and conduct all of their activities in accordance with them.

  5. Mistakes and inaccuracies shall be swiftly and prominently corrected.

  6. The interests and viewpoints of those who may be harmed by coverage in the Society’s publications shall be considered in all publishing decisions.

  7. Material intended to promote bigotry or violence against a group or person shall not be included in any of the Society’s publications, except in the context of reporting or commentary upon it. This provision shall not be interpreted to exempt groups or persons from legitimate criticism.

Please leave your thoughts and concerns below.

Interview with Marc Fontaine (BuildSFU)

0

The Peak spoke with Marc Fontaine, BuildSFU general manager, about progress on the Simon Fraser University SUB development; Fontaine details the three proposed locations for the SUB and talks about how students can get involved.

Questions? Opinions? Shoot an email at [email protected]

Created by Brandon Hillier

Article Photo

In Review: the Vancouver Fringe Festival

0

6Guitars-Red Curtain

6 Guitars

This one-man show about the power of music as a universal language has writer Chase Padgett portraying six different characters, all playing a different style of guitar and very different personalities.

First, we meet the 87 year-old blues guitarist who explains to us that blues is about real life and that there are really only four themes: I’ve got problems, look at my car, that girl’s hot, and let’s get messed up. He explains how hip-hop music is no different. He also has a great sense of humour, explaining that he originally named himself Syphilis Mango Taft, following his hero Blind Lemon Jefferson’s naming formula of affliction, fruit, president.

Another one of my favourite characters was the jazz player who was full of pretentious comments, like, “Jazz music. I could tell you so much, but would you ever really understand it?” The folkie, Peter, is sugary sweet and talks about his first performance with his uncle’s guitar, when he sang “You Are My Sunshine” at his funeral.

With a band named Satan’s Orthodontist, the next rock guitarist is a young metal head who talks about conflict within his band and his love of “music that chews your face off.” The country musician, with his wide legged stance and southern drawl, sings about pick-up trucks, women, and beer, reinforcing the bluesman’s theory about themes.

And of course next comes the classical guitarist with what is supposed to be a Spanish accent, which wasn’t as strong as it could have been. He spoke in metaphors and about “feeling the music,” but he felt like the weakest of all the characters.

What Padgett has accomplished with this show is truly remarkable; he expertly portrayed six very different characters, smoothly transitioning between them by changing something as simple as the way he sits or his facial expression. It also helps that Padgett is a talented guitarist, captivating the audience as he plays everything from soft jazz, to heartfelt blues, to head-banging rock.

By the end of the show, after making a case for each of their respective guitar styles, the musicians all talk about their respect for other styles and the way that music, no matter what genre, is a great equalizer that brings people together and helps them express their deepest emotions.

 

YouKilledHamlet-Nathaniel Justiniano and Ross Travis Photo by Shootthatklown 2

You Killed Hamlet

I don’t even know how to describe this show. I’ve seen a lot of theatre, but I’ve never seen anything like this. Full of blunt satire and content most people would rather avoid, You Killed Hamlet had very little connection to the Danish prince other than the theme of mortality.

The show involves two bouffon clowns with dangly nuts and other parts, wearing fat-suits, and looking pretty ugly talking about everything from colostomy bags to suicide. They sauntered into the venue as if they were audience members, weaving through the tables saying things like “we made it . . . oh gosh, so great to see you.”

There were a lot of references to the show itself as they voiced potential thoughts of audience members like, “What kind of show is this” and “This has nothing to do with Hamlet!

Their catchy song “Who plays Hamlet in this show” was quite funny and I did enjoy some of the humour, but I found most of this show unpleasant and bordering on offensive — to the senses, that is, not politically offensive.

One scene that I found fairly clever involved the clowns taking turns acting out a series of negative effects of growing older or getting sick, adding a new one to the sequence each time. The other clown would stand in the audience and guess what the first was portraying, and once they guessed correctly the clown on stage yelled, “Don’t want to think about it!”

Another scene had them pretending to be Fringe-goers who just saw their show and they wandered around the audience saying “Oh my god we just saw the show. It was a . . . well it was . . . a decent show . . . decent. But you know what you could do?” Then they would answer “production value,” or “circus acts.”

The show suggested that we live in a society that represses negative things and is uncomfortable talking about realities like death and illness. While some of their material was humorous, and they were talented entertainers, this just wasn’t an enjoyable show.

 

STRAPLESS PRESS PHOTO 3 - Bubble Pyramid

Strapless Comedy

When a show begins with a “strapless Riverdance” where clothing keeps falling down during the performance, it’s not hard to grab an audience’s attention. The five girls of this sketch comedy troupe aren’t afraid to show off their assets, but they can also write some pretty hilarious sketches.

A few stand out, including “5 Card Stud,” a girls’ poker game where they bet ex-boyfriends instead of money: “I’ll see your jobless loser and raise you two commitment-phobes.” I really enjoyed “Carl and Jan Go to the Bank”, which had a Saturday Night Live feel to it as the aged Carl holds up the bank because they won’t take his pennies.

“Break Up Movers” was also hilarious, as they advertise their services to move you out in the middle of the night without your partner even knowing. If you want to avoid the awkward moving out conversation, just call the break up movers.

I think my favourite sketch was the final one, “Indie Rock Crush,” written by Jackie Blackmore. It was about a woman who has a crush on one of the boys in her son’s band. She breaks into song, dancing around the stage with her broom singing things like “I wish I was your guitar so you could strum me; I wish I was your bus ticket so you could validate me.”

One of the sketches that I could relate to was called “Sign It.” One girl was sitting at a table as two others, dressed in matching track suits, told her that if she wanted to get in shape she better sign up for their gym’s membership, and if she didn’t sign in the next ten seconds, the special offer would expire. If you’ve ever signed a gym contract, you’ll know that their sketch wasn’t too much of an exaggeration.

There were a few sketches that, unfortunately, fell flat: “Nemesis” had a boyfriend telling his girlfriend that the best way to deal with her nemesis is to fight her. A few of the sketches just didn’t seem to have strong enough endings, but there were definitely a lot of laughs. With lots of confidence, no fear, and plenty of comedy writing talent, Strapless Comedy has a lot of potential and I think their material has just enough of a risky edge that it will resonate with people.

 

Bad Connections? Laughing Image

Bad Connections?

Fringe festivals are full of one-man shows, but I doubt most are as impressive as Paul Cosentino portraying nine New Yorkers in this play written by Michael Levesque. With only a chair sharing the stage with him and no costume changes, Cosentino transitions through these characters, including an old Italian shopkeeper, a Jewish housewife, a pregnant black woman, and a gay yoga instructor, with ease.

As he unravels the puzzle of how these characters’ lives intersect, he draws the audience into a world that he has created, quite literally, out of thin air; there are no props, only one plain brown outfit, and pure storytelling.

Sri Sri, an Indian guru, began the show by explaining that we should all take a deep breath and take a moment to stop, look, and listen in our hectic lives. We all took a collective breath and settled in for a great piece of theatre.

This theme ran throughout the play, and Sri Sri returned a few times to provide his wisdom. The plot involves a cast of characters all with their own problems, some of them struggling to figure out if they have made the right choices in their lives.

Italian Joey Marino runs his grandpa’s store by himself while his grandpa, Joseph Marino, is in the hospital telling him he doesn’t want to live anymore. Mr. Marino is being treated by Dr. Alex Redding who has his own problems — he’s married to Jewish housewife Debra Steiner while having an affair with her yoga instructor, Tommy. Debra got married for the wrong reasons and complains about her mother, who thinks her husband should be Jewish (although she says that being a doctor almost negates that requirement).

Joey Marino’s pregnant girlfriend, Dwandra, worries that Joey doesn’t want to marry her, and Joey worries that his grandpa disapproves of their relationship. Their son J.J. also makes a couple of small appearances, but I thought he was the weakest character portrayed and it probably wasn’t necessary for him to be seen on stage.

While I thought the acting in this show was superb, I found some of the coincidences between the characters to be a bit forced. Sri Sri does say that there is no such thing as a coincidence, so I guess he would disagree.

English: a degree for the curious

0

WEB-English major-flickr-shutterhack copy

English majors are often at the heart of jokes culminating in the word “barista” and accompanied by smug laughter. Though I acknowledge the job market may be harder to navigate with a degree not funneling straight into a high paying profession, I will never give in to the belief that a degree in English is not worthwhile. While I might get some respect for my ability to write or edit with more ease than my peers in more “practical” fields, I did not pick my major for these skills. I declared a major in English because I really love — and see the value of — reading.

Sometimes I tell people I study English because I am an academic nomad. When you study something with a more concrete set of rules and figures (such as Chemistry or Statistics), there are fewer opportunities to truly interact with the curriculum. Literature allows one the freedom to walk among sights that have been seen and studied for hundreds of years while possessing an opinion that matters. I savour the ability to be able to move between eras, authors, and genres with only the weight of my own experiences to bear upon my adventure.

Along the way, there are many relics left in the form of critiques and responses from those who have previously explored each piece. Literature is a conversation that spans many years and is host to a variety of different voices from all walks of life.

With that said, reading texts from any era is not simply about engaging with a story and forming an opinion on it. The stories comprising fictional literature are only a small part of what an English major studies; books are vessels carrying information from different fields that beg analysis on many levels.

The roots of our modern academic fields can be found within literature.

Literature is written by people, for people, and is most often about people. Stepping away from the conventions of mere plot, there are many layers of economic, linguistic, historical, psychological, scientific, and social depth that are conveyed in a text. In order to provide a strong analysis of a literary work, one must consider all the contextual factors stemming from the time period and the author’s life. Reading literature is reading society and learning through the observation of the many interacting factors affecting human life.

Literature is relevant, regardless of the era in which it was written, because written expressions of fact and fiction are records. They detail everything from social movements to political and religious reformations, and therefore provide information about the world as it was at different periods of time.

The roots of all our modern academic fields can be found within the pages of literature. The way we do things is a product of our history, something documented through writings that describe the mundane activities along with the societal fears and dreams of a culture. Though a plot itself may not appear to serve anything other than enjoyment, it is actually riddled with facts and lessons. A degree in English is a thing for the curious, and for those who love learning. It is because I want to study everything that I study literature.

While I respect the work my peers do in the more employable fields, I stand by my choice to do an English major. Though I have learned to write and edit in the process, the real gain is in my knowledge of the world and the people who inhabit it.

A passion for punctuation

0

In the seventh grade, I argued with a teacher for 20 minutes over the correct definition of “irony.” In kindergarten, I prided myself on my ability to differentiate “they’re,” “there” and “their.” I distinctly remember losing a friend at a birthday party over an argument concerning the pronunciation of the video game Super Smash Brothers Melee. (It’s may-lay, not muh-lee.)

My love affair with words has eclipsed all of my former, present and future passions: build a time machine and find me at any period in my life, and though you’re likely to meet a different person each time, all of my varied selves will share a warmth and fondness towards the grammatical and the syntactic. My room is littered with old journals and scraps of paper. Should a fire ever start in there, I don’t stand a chance.

Don’t get me wrong, because I realize English is among the most difficult languages to learn. I don’t envy ESL students who contend with subtle ordering, irregular verb conjugation, and diverse etymological origins. I take for granted my subconscious understanding of English’s myriad synonyms and esoteric turns of phrase.

But at the same time, I cringe every time the Oxford Dictionary allows a term like “food baby” or “selfie” to creep into its ranks. I’m protective of the vocabulary I so often take advantage of, and the ascension of a term like “derp” from silly South Park jokes to bonafide real word status irks me to no end; I’m not against neologisms, but come on.

Still, I can’t help but love the way that the English language — delicate yet cacophonous, simple yet idiosyncratic — helps me to form and better express my ideas. An introvert to the core, I’ve never been particularly good at conveying my thoughts and feelings through subtle gestures or body language. Though, to be fair, I often exaggerate my words with dramatic hand motions, if only to increase the impact of my most important phrases.

Language has helped me to define who I am, and it does to this day. I’m rarely to be found without a pen and pad on my person, in case a situation should arise that I feel would be better understood when written down. I salute my calloused middle finger which so often balances my pens, and the ink stains on so many of my cardigans.

Punctuation, in particular, may be my favourite facet of language. It gives the written word a leg up over the spoken. After all, an implied ellipsis is never as good as the real thing. The period, the comma, the semicolon and even the oft-maligned em dash — each of these tools are like old friends, always there for me when I need them, and rarely asking anything in return.

My Copy Editor will laugh when she reads this, because she’s all too familiar with my syntactic preoccupation. It’s likely the final version of this article you’re reading has significantly fewer punctuation marks than my first draft — believe me, she’s done you a favour. I’ve read countless arguments for simple, clean prose, and I’m inclined to agree. But I just can’t help myself; there are too many wonderful words out there, and I’ve never been very good at keeping things short and to the point.

They say the first step is admitting you have a problem. My addiction is the written word — the best and worst tool you’ll ever have, capable of breaking hearts and mending wounds in equal measure. Ask me again in 10 years, and I suspect the answer will be the same.

We are living in a post-post 9/11 world

0

WEB-world trade center- flickr-Cyril Attias copy

The image of the burning towers was the first thing on television when I woke up on September 11, 2001. Being nine years old at the time, I didn’t fully understand the significance of the event; I knew it was an attack on a famous building, and I knew that it was bad, but I also knew that a lot of bad things happened on the news. What made this event so special? It seemed to my naive nine year old self that all the adults around me were overreacting.

I remember my parents telling me that people would still be talking about the September 11 attacks for years to come. I was skeptical, but of course they turned out to be right, to the point where people often say we are living in the “post 9/11 world” — a world of increased government surveillance and fear of terrorism.

I’m 21 now, so I’ve been living in this “world” for more than half my life. As such, I’ve never known any other kind of world, at least not from an adult perspective. What media pundits have called the “post 9/11 world,” everyone roughly my age and younger has had to accept as just “the world.”

Less than a decade from now, people who weren’t old enough to remember the 9/11 attacks will be old enough to vote. These are people whose beliefs and values have been shaped by the fear prevalent in Western culture over the last 12 years.

Young people are taking for granted levels of surveillance that would have been considered shocking not long ago. There was a time when, upon hearing reports of government agencies spying on private phone data, the typical response would have been to dismiss it as ridiculous and as a conspiracy theory.

People are treating 9/11 as a cultural fixture.

Nowadays, the response is considerably more blasé; people recognize they are being spied on, and respond, “so?” My purpose here is not to collapse into an anti-NSA diatribe, but merely to point out the change that has occurred in our behaviour.

What interests me about the idea of the post 9/11 world, is that it places the repercussions of the attacks at a higher level of historical importance than the attacks themselves. As time goes on, people are treating 9/11, not as a tragic event, but as a cultural fixture of the era in which we live.

I don’t have an objective view of the situation, and it’s possible that I never will, given that I have spent more than half my life in this post 9/11 world. For this reason, we need to give appropriate time to reflect on 9/11’s full implications.

There’s a (mis)quote from Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai who, when asked about the implications of the French Revolution, said “it’s too soon to say” (he was actually talking about the 1968 civil unrest in France, not the 1789 revolution).

Misquote or not, if you were to ask me what the implications of 9/11 were, my answer would have to be the same, the naivete of my 9-year-old self notwithstanding: it’s still too soon to say.

Outstanding students shouldn’t be ashamed of their success

10

WEB-golden key response-Mark Burnham

As a student who strives for excellence, I have continually struggled with the shame and ridicule that comes from succeeding at university. Whether it was feeling the need to hide my scholarship offer, keeping quiet while fellow students rant about how a “TA is such a hard marker,” or getting harassed for deciding to take a night to study rather than always going out, I have been met with opposition by my peers every time I strive to succeed.

I recognize the university tries to create a safe, encouraging space for students who excel. However, I can’t help but notice that student support and networking groups almost exclusively offer resources to those in need of academic help, or those whose passions lie outside academia.

SFU Golden Key is the only group I have found in my four years at SFU that celebrates excellence. For once, there is no shame in receiving high grades or wanting to be involved as a leader in the academic community.

Don’t use Reddit quotes and uninformed statements in place of facts.

I can openly talk of the struggles I have with my school and work-life balance, shamelessly express fear over losing scholarships by failing to attain a high CGPA, and find friends to study with during exams who don’t encourage me to cast aside my goals in exchange for a hangover. This is precisely why I wanted to write in response to the article published on Sept. 9 regarding supposed skepticism and the Golden Key society.

Even as I write this letter, I worry over the judgment I may receive in response. But I ask you: why is it that students can laugh and bond over the fact that they “completely bombed that exam,” while I have to hide a paper from my peers that deservedly got an excellent grade after hours of hard work? Call it anti-social or elitist if you’d like, but I believe I should be able to take pride in my hard work and academic success rather than sneaking it in at the bottom of my LinkedIn profile.

So please don’t use Reddit quotes and vague, uninformed statements in place of the facts you were given by informed people to tear down an organization concretely and internationally proven to help students succeed, find friends, get financial support, study and network abroad, and give back to their communities. “Student skepticism” arises from a lack of factual and objective information, not from the organization being shady, illegitimate or exclusive.

It’s an honour to be part of SFU Golden Key, and becoming a member should feel and be celebrated as such. Membership fees are not a scam — they are used to support events, travel opportunities, and scholarships of the Golden Key International Honour Society’s thousands of members worldwide.

Clan football kicks off 2013 with a win

0

WEB-football-adam OC

On September 7, in the opening game of the 2013 season, the SFU football team defeated the Humboldt State University Lumberjacks 41-27, on the road. It was only one game, and the team still has a long way to go this season, but oh how far the Clan has come.

During the Clan’s winless inaugural season in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), not too long ago, the team journeyed to HSU’s California campus only to be blown out 66–20. That was 2010. Now, in 2013, head coach Dave Johnson and his team returned home victors over the team projected to finish first in the Great Northwest Athletic Conference (GNAC) — by comparison, SFU was projected to rank second-last in the conference’s six-team field.

It’s not quite a David-and-Goliath-type upset, despite the ranking disparity. “There’s so much parity in the GNAC,” said Johnson. “Every week you’ve got to go out and play well, and it’s going to be a dogfight. I think that’s a good thing, our guys prefer it that way.”

He pointed to other NCAA conferences where games end up with 80+ point differentials. “Neither team gets anything out of that,” he says. “Week in, week out, it’s a high level of football [in the GNAC] and anybody can beat anybody.”

Still, no matter how small the upset, there are plenty of reasons for optimism up on Terry Fox Field. The Clan, who lost its starting quarterback, running back, and its offensive coordinator over the summer, had questions going into their week one showdown — and for the most part, they were answered.

Johnson said new starting quarterback Ryan Stanford won the job just before the team’s first game, but hit it out of the park in the first game, “The QB spot, I know we had the GNAC QB of the Year last year, but we really felt we needed an upgrade at that position.” He continued, “And not just in terms of arm strength or athletic ability, but leadership; someone who is a team guy. That has certainly happened with Ryan. And he also happened to throw for 300-something yards.”

Four-hundred and forty-six, actually.

“To see what this offense is capable of . . . It was a good way for us to get started,” smiled Johnson. “But the run game,” he admitted, “was a little bit behind [compared to the passing game]. But we’re becoming more balanced than we’ve ever been.”

But perhaps the biggest question was on defense, where there was plenty of room for improvement from a year ago. “Last year we sucked on defense,” confessed Johnson. So surely there’s nowhere to go but up?

“We have a lot of work to do, but I was encouraged. Did you know [HSU] only had the ball for nine minutes in the entire second half?” he asked, proudly. He admitted part of that was due to a soaring offense that scored 27 second-half points (aided by a 164-yard, three-touchdown performance by receiver Lemar Durant, who is looking more and more like a legitimate NFL prospect). But the progress he’s seen is promising.

“We’re far from where we can be, but it’s nice to start with a win.” One game in and he’s seen plenty of improvements in areas he believes really needed them. Now, Johnson gets a bye week before his team faces Central Washington on the road, a team ranked right behind HSU in the GNAC, on Sept. 21.

“We spent a lot of training camp prepping for Humboldt,” he said. “Now, we get a chance to rest, heal, prepare and plan for another big test. I love it.”