Go back

BC Public Health will not keep us safe from COVID-19

The concerns of those at-risk have largely been ignored

By: Charlie Ruiz, SFU Student

After the worst COVID-19 outbreak this province has seen, cases are finally falling. This is the result of months of COVID-19 precautions — yet, we are once again beginning to lift restrictions. Most recently, BC has decided to drop mandatory masking, despite this being a key precaution in slowing disease spread. This new policy ignores the reality of COVID-19 and further pushes those who are already at-risk into higher risk. 

As I would hope we all know by now, COVID-19 is airborne. This means COVID-19 floats in the air, sometimes for hours, and can easily be transmitted in public areas — unless people are wearing masks. We have years of evidence supporting the benefits of masking — and Dr. Bonnie Henry herself has stated, “We still need this tool.” In a recent interview, she added, while masking may not be currently mandated, it’s still important. 

Why then did Dr. Henry lift mask mandates with barely a day’s notice? She explained she doesn’t believe we need a policy to ensure people wear masks. Well, only a few days after this mandate was lifted, that’s not what’s happening. It’s evident that BC Public Health is misjudging the province’s responses to the health crisis; harming us all. 

SFU has followed public health in lifting the mask mandate, and as a result people will become infected. Students didn’t sign up for courses expecting mask mandates would be dropped at a moment’s notice. Frankly, SFU’s constant claims of being an equitable university are laughable when they so blatantly exclude the concerns of disabled communities when reconsidering masking requirements. As a university, they are not bound to mimic provincial guidelines, as demonstrated by UBC’s continued support of indoor mask mandates. 

Public Health and various other sources recognize the importance of masking to prevent COVID-19, yet they have not done their job in implementing these measures to keep the community safe. Moreover, mask wearing is most effective when everyone wears them, so these new policies effectively decrease their value. Sure, we have high vaccination rates in BC — but variants running amok decrease the amount of protections vaccines can provide. Worse yet, we’ve already lived through this chapter of history: in the summer of 2021, mask mandates were lifted, only to be implemented a few weeks later due to high levels of transmission. The nature of viruses is that new variants will arise and there is evidence they can become stronger.

To those who claim we should “move on,” I would like to ask: what part of wearing a mask has any real effect on your life? You are still going to school, restaurants are open, and you can travel

But what are immunocompromised people supposed to do? The idea that those who are not OK with lifting these precautions should just lock themselves up at home is inequitable, especially when such a small measure effectively decreases transmission. 

At-risk people cannot simply protect themselves on an individual scale. Rather than forcing people into isolation wherever possible, we should be creating policies that invite them to participate with us safely.

There has been an emphasis on “kindness” towards personal choice on masking. I acknowledge there are valid reasons to not wear one, but not being bothered to protect those around me is a choice I struggle to accept with kindness.

We will never get out of this pandemic unless there is coordination with guidelines, and not the flip-flopping between precautions every month. BC and SFU have made clear their priorities — get back to “normal” regardless of the cost. BC dropped reporting COVID-19 active cases, and this obscures the data we have on the pandemic. Just because we’ve stopped tracking the data, doesn’t mean it’s not there. This far into COVID-19, I’m tired of begging institutions to do the bare minimum to protect those in the community.

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...

Read Next

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...
Picked For You

Today’s Top Picks,

For You

photo of Skytrain expo line

TransLink’s fare enforcement blitz is a terrible idea

By: Yagya Parihar, SFU Student In my lifetime of using public transit, I only remember having been fare checked three times. All three times were in BC while exiting SkyTrain stations in late 2024. I tapped my pass on the fare gate, and the transit cop asked to see my…

This is a photo of an empty SUB hallway that features the “SFSS Admin Offices” room. Next to the room is a big bulletin board with about 30 neatly lined-up posters and a big red number 3 to indicate the level of the SUB.

Five SFSS full-time union staff receive layoff notices

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer and Hannah Fraser, News Editor The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) has initiated staff layoffs, with five out of eight full-time union positions affected as of July 25. All the positions either support student activities or the SFSS’ operations, and do not include SFSS executives.…

This is a photo of the SFU Surrey Engineering Building from the inside. There are numerous levels to the building, artificial trees, and a wide staircase in the photo.

TSSU speaks on latest updates to IP policy

By: Corbett Gildersleve, News Writer As recently reported by The Peak, the Senate reviewed and discussed a new draft version of its intellectual property (IP) policy solely focused on the commercialization of inventions and software. Based on community feedback, they split the IP policy into two: one for inventions and…

Block title

Dining workers speak to poor working conditions

By: Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer On October 7, a Reddit user posted to r/simonfraser concerning the possibility of a dining worker strike across SFU’s Burnaby campus. The message, which is from Contract Worker Justice (CWJ) @SFU, asserted that SFU “hasn’t budged on insourcing workers and is now trying to walk back its commitments to living wage.” The post also mentioned “a very heated labour environment on campus with several possible strikes and actions for precarious workers upcoming.”  The Peak corresponded with Preet Sangha, a UNITE HERE Local 40 union representative, who spoke with two dining hall employees and forwarded their responses to us via email. Local 40 “represents workers throughout BC who work in hotels, food service, and airports.” Names have been changed to protect their...