Home Blog Page 966

Spotlight on Camara

0
Camara is one of the rising stars of SFU Athletics.

One of the biggest storylines this year for the men’s soccer team is how they will replace the void Jovan Blagojevic left. He scored 18 goals in 18 games last year, and was named GNAC player of the year before being drafted by the Vancouver Whitecaps. He was the undisputed star of the team. But now, SFU looks like they have another up and coming talent on their hands: Mamadi Camara.

“I was six years old [when I started playing soccer],” explains Camara, who grew up in Quebec. “I played for a local team in Montreal [. . .] I played there for two or three years, then I transferred to a team in Southshore, who had coaches, and better insulations.

“[As a kid] we use to play in the park right next to our house with kids from different ages. We would just play with the ball, no real net. It was just fun.”

A few years later, he was heading on to play soccer at the postsecondary level, but Mamadi almost ended up not going to Simon Fraser.

“I was supposed to go to Southern New Hampshire last year. However, it didn’t work out, for various reasons. So this past summer, I emailed Clint [Schneider . . .] I told him, ‘I’m still looking for a school, and if you have room for a scholarship, I would be interested.’ I had been in contact with him earlier in the year, so he replied to me right away and said we still have some scholarship money, because one of the players that was suppose to join the team didn’t get into the school. . . So I sent my transcript really quickly, and he responded in two days, saying that I was accepted into the school of communication.

“[What attracted me to SFU] is the fact that it’s the only Canadian School in the NCAA,” Camara says. “It’s kind of cool when you go down to the United States and you represent one whole country. . . I also really like the environment here. I came to Vancouver once when I was 14 years old for Nationals, and I really liked it. You’re surrounded by mountains and trees.”

“Pressure is what drives me [. . .] when I have more pressure, I think I perform better.”

So, does representing an entire country give extra motivation? “Definitely,” he says. “It’s something that comes up really often in the speech from the coach. He always reminds us that we are representing Canada, and we must be good when we go down there. And we have a really good program. . . we’re one of the most respected programs in Division II. It’s cool that this program is from Canada.”

Some freshmen struggle for playing time on a new team, but not Camara. He has quickly become an integral part of the team, starting nearly every game, which is rare for a freshman.

“I think the coaches are really looking forward to put the best 11 out there. So if you don’t give them a choice, they’re going to put you on the field. That’s my mentality. If you want to be a starter, you just need to work hard enough so you can prove to the coach and to everyone else that you deserve your place on the field.”

He also has a strong support network around him that has helped him get integrated quickly. “I’m fortunate to live with three other guys that have a lot of experience. Robert Hyams, who is in third year, Shane Sharma, who’s a senior, and Calvin Opperman, who’s a junior. These guys really helped me to really sort out my classes, get the best schedule I could, and give me some advice.

“We have help from our teammates in this team. It’s really good.”

Being so early on in his Simon Fraser career, this support has paid dividends for Camara, who won GNAC offensive player of the week for October 8. He scored three goals in two matches, both of which were game-winners.

“It felt good to see that your efforts are rewarded when you work for it,” says Camara. “However, that’s only one little title. I would be more pleased to win the NCAA title with my team than to win any other individual title.”

That NCAA title didn’t seem very likely at the beginning of the season, but the team is now firmly back in the race for the GNAC title and a potential postseason run. “The way we started this season is not the way we expected,” says Camara. “It was a tough start at Sonoma, losing 3–1 [. . .] I think we are just starting to get more confident, and building towards our goal, which is to win the NCAA title.”

As a freshman, Camara has already established himself as a key component of the team, and perhaps the future star player of the team. For his part, he himself seems up to the added pressure of being a more integral part of the team, and filling the void left from the departed Jovan.

“Pressure is what drives me [. . .]  when I have more pressure, I think I perform better. It may be a bit more pressure, but I like it.”

#ShoutYourAbortion is a tragedy

2

On October 5, an article written in The Peak regarding the hashtag #ShoutYourAbortion taught me two things. The first is that the author possess a strong heart and good intentions. The second is that a fruitful dialogue can be constructed from engaging with the concerns in the article.

The piece touches on a myriad of concerns, but I want to focus on a general theme — namely, the false dilemma epitomized in the claim that “abortion is about escaping an impossible situation.” The implication is that some pregnant women are backed against a wall with no easy way out: abortion or having a child she can’t support.

For example, we might imagine the worst: the parents are tyrants, the ‘boyfriend’ only stayed one night, the stack of bills races the stack of school work to the ceiling, and, by sheer bad luck, a meteor recently impaled the woman’s apartment. In nine months, a baby arrives. Abortion resolves one of these worries.

Now the author claims that if anti-abortion advocates care for children, they should advocate for surrounding issues like greater health care or whatnot. This is true, but it also illuminates why abortion or letting a mother and child suffer aren’t the only options in ‘impossible situations’ — hence the false dilemma.

The third choice is to address the problem, which is why anti-abortion advocates promote crisis pregnancy centers that provide support for women where there is none. This option is not necessarily easier than the others, but it is there and it is an escape from “impossible situations.” A woman isn’t forced to choose her life over her baby’s.

In destigmatizing abortion, we not only promote a decision that solves little, but adds to our woes if a human being is killed.

More on “impossible situations.” The existence of these situations points to deeper failings in society, whether they be the economy, health care, or even in not being loved by one’s parents. But abortion solves none of these things. The parents are still tyrannical, the ‘boyfriend’ isn’t coming back, bills and work still race, and that meteor won’t move itself. In destigmatizing abortion, we not only promote a decision that solves little, but also add to our woes if a human being is killed.

#ShoutYourAbortion is actually rather depressing: it’s an indicator of the destitution of society that ironically draws attention away from it.

I can address one rebuttal here: “Jean-luc, you too are talking about abortion. Aren’t you also distracting from the surrounding issues?” Guilty as charged. In some sense I am. But seeing as how I believe that human life is lost in abortion and that funding for abortion could be put toward alleviating the causes of actual “impossible situations,” I cannot see a true contradiction. As soon as abortion is illegal, I’ll happily vote left.

The fact is that #ShoutYourAbortion reeks of tragedy. Abortion might allow one to escape part of an impossible situation, but it does not resolve that situation. It screams of our societal destitution but detracts from an answer. Furthermore, it distracts from the real question at hand: Is abortion an act that kills a human being?

The answer to this question implies serious consequences: If pro-choicers are right, then I am a misogynist fighting against women’s rights. If I am right, however, then pro-choicers support the killing of almost 65,000 Canadians in 2010, and much closer to 100,000 annually in the years prior to this. I prefer to risk being a misogynist.

Controversial app Peeple has become its own worst critic

5

The Killers once vaguely quoted Hunter S. Thompson with, “Are we human, or are we dancer?” Contrastingly, the Calgary-based mobile app Peeple asked upon its inception, ‘are we human, or are we restaurants?’ But after a storm of outrage and criticism, as The Guardian reported on October 6, the app has been completely overhauled to remove its controversial aspects. It leaves an empty shell of an app behind.

Originally, Peeple allowed people to rate other people similar to how restaurants are rated on apps like Yelp. There would have been a 48-hour period before negative reviews would be made public to allow the parties involved to work out the issues that would have lead to the negative review.

This window would also have allowed the person making the review an opportunity to change their initial negative review to a positive one. Finally, as a way to reduce needless harassment, the app would have required users to login using their Facebook and to provide a contact number.

Unfortunately, this has all been changed. The app now only allows for positive reviews, and this is undoubtedly a bad thing. If you want someone to always tell you that you’re a perfect human no matter what, you’d do best to call your mother. It is a universal truth that not everybody is going to like you.

While the idea of rating other people on a system that is solely based on subjective factors may seem somewhat repellent, it’s actually something that we do everyday. Yet in our daily lives we aren’t given the opportunity to learn what other people don’t like about us, and we can’t grow based on their criticism.

While the idea of rating other people on an app seems somewhat repellent, it’s actually something that we do everyday.

While the Internet is known for shady message boards, subreddits, Twitter feuds, and whatever else, most of these forums are anonymous. Peeple, in its original state, aimed to remove this anonymity. While it would have been possible to create a fake Facebook account and phone number to review a person, the person on the receiving end of that review would know that the reviewer is not an actual person. This would have allowed the receiver to either call reviewer out, or write a response to the negative review.

While the criticisms that caused the app to change were rooted in the ability to give another person a negative review, the issue seems to be less about the app and more a symptom of our current societal state. There is now a distinct trend towards praising people for the slightest things they do, while preventing them from experiencing the harsh realities of failure.

The real world doesn’t allow for this to happen 100 per cent of the time. In reality, nobody cares that you remembered to clean your cat’s litter box, and your boss doesn’t care that you had insomnia if you slept in and missed that conference call with Japan. Many times, when you do something that you are supposed to do, you won’t receive praise. Likewise, when you fail at something, oftentimes you are not allowed make up for it.

Peeple tried to toughen us up by removing some of the bubble wrap that society has placed around itself. Unfortunately, it was suffocated by our society, and became chronically nice instead of honest.

So until another app tries to challenge this mentality, we can only hope to distinguish between whether we are human or dancer.

Everyone shows love differently

0

My ex’s brother tried to give me relationship advice at a party about a year ago. He told me to expect 40 per cent but always give 60 per cent. It was one of the keys to a relationship — always giving more than you expect in return. If both partners are consistently operating around these percentages, there is some kind of balance that can be achieved. So what could possibly go wrong?

I think somewhere along the line, his 60 per cent fell and my 40 per cent rose. These changes did not work well together; we lost balance pretty quickly. Inevitably, I began longing for more while he began longing for less, and the give-and-take began morphing into a game of push and pull.

I liked the equation at the time I heard it, but I’ve since then changed my mind. My father told me he had a conversation with a friend in which it was discussed that in a relationship, you do not date the person; instead, you date their best version. Because if you’re truly in love with somebody, you want to be the best version of yourself that you can for that person.

I am proposing a new percentage ratio. Give 150 per cent, and expect 100. If you really love somebody, and I mean the madly, deeply, Grey’s Anatomy “pick me, choose me, love me,” kind of love, you’re going to put everything you possibly can into the person you’re with. At the same time, there should be some expectation that your partner is at least going to attempt to do the same.

However, there’s a trick to all these methods surrounding expectations, and sometimes it can throw an entire balance off. Sometimes, when we expect the 100, or even the 40, we expect it to be shown in a certain way. Often there’s a correlation between the way in which we give love and how we expect to receive it, which can have dangerous outcomes. I’ve learned a lot about what it means to love somebody over the past few years, and that how somebody chooses to love me will often look completely different.

Sometimes, the differences between how each partner chooses to love can define the course of a relationship, including the end of it. Perhaps that is what defined the end of mine. We loved each other in ways that made it difficult for the other to recognize. Back then, I wanted the kind of love that was all-consuming, which was something I began to push for, and he wanted a love that was simpler, perhaps a little less scary — so he began to pull away.

We all love each other differently; sometimes it works, sometimes it crumbles. But I think in order for it to ever work, it should be okay to expect more than 40 per cent, and if that’s being given, it’s just a matter of recognizing how. At the time, I thought I could have loved him for the rest of my life, but I see now it’s okay he could have only loved me for right then.

Board Shorts

0

SUB financing approved

The board unanimously approved a Commitment Letter from the Bank of Nova Scotia regarding financing for the new Student Union Building (SUB). At the SFSS AGM in September, the student body approved a motion that would allow the board to procure a loan for the project to move forward.

As such, the board authorized the SFSS to “establish the Credit Facilities and borrow monies from the Lender upon such terms and conditions [. . .] pursuant to the Commitment Letter,” among other items.

Emergency Food Bank Certificate Program

There was a brief discussion about the status of the SFSS’s Emergency Food Bank Certificate Program. The program identifies students in financial need and helps them cover the costs of food expenses. It was noted by Business Representative Hangue Kim that over 3,000 students have used the program since it began. Kim suggested looking into improving accessibility to the program and improving the screening process to prevent misuse.

VP External Kathleen Yang brought up that the word “emergency” might deter people who may be in financial need, but not in dire circumstances.

Food and Beverage Services mandate

The society’s Food and Beverage Services (FBS) has a new mandate in an effort to prevent further deficits. The mandate, passed unanimously, specifies that whereas the FBS currently “has no clear mandate,” it should operate as a profitable business and a report should be drafted about the feasibility of this mandate.

VP University Relations Brady Yano explained the reasoning behind the new mandate: “We didn’t want to set the bar at break-even.”

Satellite Signals

0

Vancouver vancouver

Continue to celebrate SFU’s 50th Anniversary at the Vancouver Campus Open House. From 4–8 p.m. on Oct. 21, there will be free workshops, entertainment, prizes, and more.

Workshops include information about programs in continuing studies, business, and communication, as well as info sessions about urban studies and the publishing program at SFU.

Be sure to register early to be entered into the prize draw!

Surrey surrey

Participate in the #MYSFUSURREY campaign to share photos of your Surrey Campus experience, and become a part of the photo gallery in the Grand Hall.

This ongoing opportunity wants to highlight your SFU Surrey Campus experience by featuring photos tagged with #MYSFUSURREY posted in the Grand Hall. To enter, follow @sfusurreycampus on Instagram or tweet a picture to @sfusurrey. They also request that you include a brief message about your experience.

For those that aren’t into social media but still want to participate, submissions can be emailed to [email protected].

Findings suggest mammoth presence in Haida Gwaii 57,000 years ago

0
Scientists theorize that mammoths may once have roamed Haida Gwaii. - Illustration by Zach Chan

The Haida Gwaii Islands off of the northern coast of BC are sometimes called the ‘Canadian Galapagos’ for the scientific interest they inspire.

Recent research undertaken by Rolf Mathewes of the SFU Biology Department, along with other researchers who have backgrounds in earth sciences, seems to confirm this label.

Focusing on the sea cliffs at Cape Ball on the eastern coast of Haida Gwaii, the research team made significant discoveries in terms of dating the penultimate period of glaciation on Haida Gwaii, along with evidence that shows the presence of large grazing animals on this part of the islands approximately 57,000 years ago.

The discovery of large numbers of coprophilous (dung-loving) spores, along with their spore-producing bodies, suggests that during the penultimate ice age, there was probably a watering hole that was frequented by large grazing mammals such as caribou, bison, or mammoths.

“It’s true serendipity. I wasn’t looking for it, wasn’t expecting it because I’d never seen those spores before on Haida Gwaii, but bang, there they were in large quantities,” explained Mathewes. “Finding these was a real crown on the story; to find these things by accident, almost.”

Mathewes was keen to stress that no fossil evidence has been found confirming the presence of mammoths or any of the other large mammals on the islands as of yet in this particular sediment layer.

Later fossil evidence, however, proves that there were indeed caribou on the islands. The presence of fossils would be the only thing that could undoubtedly confirm the presence of these large mammals during this time period.

A possible new direction for research would be to search for evidence that would prove the types of animals present at the site. The location of the site on the coast allows for storms to erode away the cliff-face, which Mathewes says could lead to the discovery of fossils in the future.

If the sea level during this penultimate ice age lowered as much as it did during in the final ice age, large mammals that were present on the mainland could have migrated across Hecate Strait to the islands. There is evidence from previous research that shows that during the last ice age, the Hecate Strait was dry land. This dry land would have served as both a refuge from the glacial ice sheets and a bridge to the island.

Mathewes also discovered fossilized pollen of Calder’s lovage (or licorice root) in the same peat layer as the coprophilous fungi, which was dated to 57,000 years. The presence of pollen from the lovage — which is an endemic plant to Haida Gwaii — strongly suggests that there was at least a portion of the islands that was not covered with ice.

This contradicts the theory that some geologists have that the islands were completely covered with ice, and indicates that the natural history of Haida Gwaii is not quite as we thought.

SFU library acquires medieval manuscript

0
Photo courtesy of SFU News

The SFU library can add one more special item to its catalogue with the recent acquisition of a medieval manuscript from London that dates back to 1296.

The manuscript is an anthology of legal texts, containing historical texts such as the civil law code of emperor Justinian, along with the laws of Frederick II, the then-emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.

Written in Latin, it was apparently preserved by a French family for centuries until their recent decision to auction it at Christie’s, an auction house in London.

The acquisition, which cost $65,000, was successfully initiated and led by SFU humanities professor Paul Dutton to fill a gap in the library’s collection of early written materials.

The funding came in part from Dutton’s Jack and Nancy Farley Endowment, the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Dean John Craig, and the library itself.

Among the other manuscripts on offer at the auction was a ninth-century manuscript that was eventually sold for three million dollars. However, it was this manuscript that to Dutton seemed to best capture both the rise of medieval universities and students.

It comes from a period representing the peak of Medieval civilization during the 13th century, when Gothic culture was reaching its greatest heights.

The manuscript will serve SFU as a specimen medieval codex, or bound book, to represent and capture that period’s print culture. It will sit among other medieval texts in the Special Collections section of the library, such as an extremely rare leaf, or single page, of one of the original Gutenberg Bibles, to the many books from the Aldine Press of the 1500s, which were among the first printed volumes small enough to be portable.

The manuscript is in surprisingly good condition, but this is consistent with the qualities of parchment as a medium, despite being essentially untanned leather, said Dutton. He added, “[the manuscript] will long outlive our modern paper and digital [content].”

Dutton plans to make a detailed catalogue entry of the manuscript to further examine the contents of the anthology, taking some time to examine the notes made by actual students on the margins of the manuscript. This will allow visitors and researchers to more efficiently use the manuscript for research purposes. He will be assisted by the Special Collections staff in this process, who will also make sure it easily accessible for students and will be well maintained given its age.

While Dutton understands that the manuscript’s content — which describes the laws of the Holy Roman Empire along with a commentary — is not unique to this specific piece, the comments, notes, and even doodles made by students using the manuscript have never before been accessible to current academic medievalists.

“Would You Rather…” at an EDM concert

0

We ask the tough questions to SFU’s Fall Kickoff crowd.

Created by Paige Smith & Eric Smith

Advice for University Freshman!

0

This week in Peak Speak, we asked SFU students what they wish they’d known in their first year here.

Created by Eric Smith & Paige Smith