Home Blog Page 773

NDP Leadership Race Gets Underway

0

By: Benjamin Mussett

As the federal Conservative leadership race grows increasingly contentious with name-calling and allegations of cheating, the federal New Democratic Party (NDP) leadership contest has begun in somewhat more affable terms. On March 12, the NDP held their first debate, a bilingual affair, in the nation’s capital. Four competitors were present: Charlie Angus, Nikki Ashton, Guy Caron and Peter Julian, all current Members of Parliament (MPs) within the House of Commons. Indeed, it seemed like the four leadership hopefuls spent more time agreeing with each other than bitterly debating the party’s future. However, Jeff Hannah, a student at SFU studying Math and current president of the SFU NDP, was happy with what he saw.

“So far I would say that each of the four candidates would make an excellent leader, [though] at this point it is still very early on,” said Hannah.

The party, which currently has 44 seats in the 338-seat House, is looking to replace their current leader Thomas Mulcair after a 2015 election which saw the New Democrats lose 59 seats and give up their Official Opposition mantle to the Conservatives. Many in the media attributed the NDP’s disappointing showing to the party’s cautious campaign style as well as their decision to move the party rightward in hopes to gain greater support.

“Eager to show that New Democrats were not wild-eyed spenders, the party embraced small-bore proposals based on a commitment to balance the budget,” wrote Evan Dyer of CBC News immediately following the election. The party’s promise to balance the budget indeed bore greater resemblance to the ruling Conservatives than to the party’s past proposals or the platform offered by the ultimately victorious Liberals.

“Ours is the most progressive platform in this election,” Justin Trudeau was often heard saying during the campaign. In fact, as Dyer points out, the Liberal leader had reason to say this. The Liberal platform “pitched a tax hike on the top one per cent of income earners, an aggressive infrastructure plan financed by deficits, means-tested child benefits and the legalization of marijuana.”

Hannah, too, expressed disappointment with how the 2015 campaign proceeded. “I think a lot of our campaign became lost in the balanced budget promise, and some of our more bold policies were forgotten,” said Hannah. “I think that the party needs to not be afraid of standing behind its bold ideas.” It is true that the NDP platform did feature some bold, progressive proposals including promises to “lower prescription drug costs by 30%” and repeal the controversial Bill C-51.

The NDP’s centrist approach in 2015 may help explain why the leadership candidates appear to be returning to the party’s leftist roots. At his campaign launch, Angus, a five-term MP from Timmins, Ontario, emphasized his working-class background offering a populist message although one that is decidedly inclusive and which touched on indigenous issues. Ashton, a young MP from Manitoba, has delivered a similarly populist vision. “We need strong leadership to stand up to the elites in Canada and the elite politics […] that are holding us back,” said Ashton at her own campaign lunch. A major advocate for indigenous and women’s issues, Ashton gained some notoriety after she personally campaigned for Senator Bernie Sanders in last year’s Democratic primary despite being a sitting MP.

Caron, a former labour economist and MP from Quebec, entered the fray with a promise to “replace social programs with a basic income for all Canadians.” It’s an unlikely fiscal policy for the Conservative party to get behind — however, it now appears that the NDP is again targeting those left-wing voters who were wooed by the Liberals in 2015. “Progressives recognize basic income as an important tool in fighting inequality and levelling the economic playing field,” said Caron.

Lastly Julian, the first to put his name in the race and an MP representing New Westminster, has said that, “Canadians need a government that prioritizes inclusivity, clean energy, and education for all.” Julian has specifically proposed eliminating tuition at post-secondary institutions, phasing out Canada’s use of fossil fuels and a greater commitment to affordable housing. All proposals which would be welcomed by the country’s political progressives, many of whom have felt let down by the Liberal government’s broken promises on electoral reform, the environment, and Indigenous issues.

“It’s not enough to simply be left-wing. Our next leader has to be able to communicate to Canadians that the NDP’s platform is in their best interest, and that the NDP is the party that will have their backs,” said Hannah. This sentiment identified another weakness in the NDP’s 2015 showing: Mulcair had trouble connecting with voters. The current NDP leader thrives as a rousing debater in the House, yet Mulcair sometimes appeared awkward and stiff on the campaign trail. Trudeau, however, who has now reached international rockstar-dom, excels in these types of public situations.

There is a long time before party members go to vote for their new leader in the fall and the deadline for candidates to enter the race isn’t until July 3. Expect more to throw their hat in the ring. And while future debates won’t be as friendly as the first, it can be guaranteed that the main target of all competitors will likely be Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party. “We played it too safe. We let the Liberals out-left us,” Ashton said at the debate, in reference to the NDP’s 2015 campaign.

With files from CBC News, the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star, Huffington Post, the National Post, Maclean’s Magazine, National Observer and Windsor Star.

SFU men’s golf finish in sixth place at Cal Baptist Invitational

0

By: James Matthews

 

In a season that’s growing with promise each tournament, SFU men’s golf continued their upwards trend this week. March 20 and 21 saw the Clan travel to Corona, California to take part in the California Baptist University Invitational. The team finished 27-over-par, good enough for a spot at sixth on the team leaderboard. The Clan appear to be distancing themselves from an ugly 19th-place finish at the Stockton Cactus Thaw in February.

 

As was the case in last week’s Notre Dame de Namur Invitational, the field shot two rounds on the first day of the tournament. BYU-Hawaii flew home with a first-place finish. They are first team not named California Baptist University to win a tournament in which the Clan appeared in this spring.

 

For the Clan, Kevin Vigna paced the team in day one He paired a season-low one-under-71 with a second round 75 on day one. His two-over scorecard had him 11th on the individual leaderboard, the highest finish of any Clan teammate. Those teammates all finished with scores in the mid to high 70s. This consistency was vital for the Clan to stay in contention at seventh place on the team leaderboard.

 

“Everyone contributed and all five players showed up on the leaderboard,” said coach Matt Steinbach. “We stayed calm, we stayed patient, and overall, we did a really good job.”

 

By all accounts, however, it was an uncharacteristic first day from Chris Crisologo. This made day two even more memorable as the junior signed off on the tournament’s best scorecard. Crisologo’s four-under-68 put him into a tie for the individual clubhouse lead for the day.

 

“When you can manage a tougher round and keep it under control that’s the sign of a great golfer. In day two, he had that look in his eye, and we could all tell he was going to have a great day.”

 

Also of note was Craig Titterington. He responded from dual seven-over (79) rounds in day one with a team-second-best one-over (73). “It’s a difficult course and he had played well the day before, but he played a very solid round.”

 

Next tournament: The Clan must pay close attention to their map as for the first time this spring, the team will play in a tournament outside of California. Instead, it will be Idaho where the Clan tees off with day one of the Northwest Nazarene Invitational set for March 27 in Nampa.

SFU softball drop both games against Central Washington

0

With numerous weather delays and cancellations to start the season, SFU softball is now in the thick of things in the regular season. After splitting the doubleheader against Saint Martin’s to start the homestand, the Clan wasn’t able to make it three wins out of four over the weekend, as they lost both games to Central Washington 11–2 and 10–1 respectively.

 

In the first game, SFU came out sluggish, as Central Washington came out to a 4–0 lead after the top of the third inning. A Taylor Ferleman single to centre field scored two runs, while a Kayla Ellis sacrifice fly scored another. The Clan managed to claw two runs back, as Taylor Gillis batted a single to score one run in the bottom of the third, while a Robyn Mogavero infield fly scored Hailey Gearey to bring the score to 4–2.

 

After that though it was all Wildcats. Kayla Ellis drove in one run with two outs in the bottom of the fifth to make it 5–2. Three straight two-run home runs — two of which came in the sixth inning — made the final score 11–2. Alia Stachoski got the start, giving up 10 hits and seven runs in 5.2 innings of work while striking out three batters.

 

SFU didn’t fare too much better in the second half of the doubleheader. After Central Washington made it 1–0 in the top of the first, the wheels completely fell off for the Clan. Taelor Griffin scored two off a pitcher’s error, and Rachael Johnson’s single scored one.

 

It got worse. A Kailyn Campbell double to right-centre field cashed in two runs, before the Wildcats tacked on two more to make it 10–1 after the top of the fifth. SFU’s Meghan Malkowich got the Clan’s lone run of the game after a solo shot to left field before the mercy rule was enacted. Tori Belton took the loss, giving up 14 hits in five innings.

 

“You never miss an opportunity to take advantage of a crisis and today’s games gave me an opportunity to play a bunch of kids and some of the kids had good outings,” said coach Mike Renney on the tough day out to SFU Athletics. “It was good for them that they got the innings they needed to get and it’s an investment in the future.”

 

The loss leaves SFU 6–9 on the season, and 2–4 in the conference — good enough for seventh place — although they have played significantly fewer games than other teams.

 

Next Game: SFU will take on Northwest Nazarene this Tuesday in another doubleheader. The Crusaders are currently 4–4 within the Great Northwest Athletic Conference, putting them in fifth place. They currently have the second-worst ERA in the conference with 5.46. Last year, SFU went 2–2 against Northwest Nazarene.

 

The first game is scheduled to start at 1 p.m., while the second game will start after at 3 p.m.

Tim Woinoski taking his swimming career the extra mile

0

Tim Woinoski’s swimming endeavours were destined to occur at SFU, given that Woinoski’s history with SFU goes way before his freshman year. Woinoski started swimming competitively in grade 10 and practiced swimming at SFU ever since. “I didn’t look at any other place except SFU when I [was] searching for universities to swim for,” Woinoski said. Currently in his third year, the swimmer dove into his beginnings in the sport.

Prior to grade 10, Woinoski wasn’t serious about the sport, but soon enough he started competing within BC through Swim Canada and ended up in the pools of Lorne Davies Complex longer than he had expected.

“Cory Beatt, my current coach, besides coach [Liam] Donnelly, has been training me ever since I joined the club team in high school,” he explained about the deeper ties Woinoski has to SFU. Fast-tracking to first year of varsity, Woinoski recollected his first training camp which added to his new experiences. He thoroughly enjoyed it with a familiar person such as Beatt around him.

“In my first year, you realize that it’s a different type of competition and get nervous. But I personally felt more relaxed and excited about swimming during dual meets,” Woinoski expressed.

Dual meets last approximately for two hours as compared to swim meets, and freshman Woinoski revelled during dual meets as he was entirely new to them. “It felt like you were swimming for something,” he said. One of the dual meets was hosted in California where Woinoski tasted the competition level as he swam against Division I competitors. He further said, “The team atmosphere is different as everyone starts to care for each other genuinely as you watch them compete in races. There’s an entire ‘team’ aspect to it that makes dual meets appealing.”

Besides dual meets, swim meets, or peak meets, SFU swimmers are mainly training for NCAA championships. Prior to the NCAAs, a swim meet enables goals at the beginning of every year. “These goals are tough and I was unable to meet my goals,” briefed Woinoski about his first-year trials for the NCAAs.

So, for the second year, Woinoski pushed harder on the same goals to try and be faster at his sport by training over summer. In trying, Woinoski scored a faster time on an 800m freestyle, but didn’t succeed in achieving his own goal in the 1,500m; but he qualified for the NCAA Division II national championships, regardless.

Competing in the NCAAs meant almost a dream come true for Woinoski. However, he added, “It made me remember why I swim. Meeting faster competitors really leaves you inspired.” However, Woinoski’s swimming trajectory has never been smooth, as he underperformed in certain swim meets while excelling in others.

Despite the uncertain ride, he qualified a second time for the NCAAs in his third year. His goal this year was to enlist himself as an all-American within the top eight as he had previously been placed at 10. Woinoski laughed, “It might sound corny, but it was a dream that I managed to achieve,” in regards to his overall wins.

A swimmer’s journey never stops as they continuously have to train and live on a routine. “We practice nine times a week for two hours and, sometimes, I double on Mondays, on Wednesday, and Fridays; getting up at 4 a.m. on most days,” explains Woinoski. The only days that Woinoski gets off are Sundays when he admittedly tries to sleep in. “There is no stopping to this,” Woinoski asserts, “as, from September to the middle of August, I’m required to train with only four weeks in between to relax.”

Despite the meticulousness of being a swimming athlete, Woinoski only wants to take things the extra mile. “I wish I could go to Mexico and compete in open waters, but time and money are constant constraints for me.” Woinoski liberally shared with The Peak his passion for swimming and beyond.

Time is a pressing concern for a student athlete. When asked about his technique for balancing school and swimming, Woinoski said, “You don’t. You just choose your battles.” A very particular and honest outlook from a student athlete, Woinoski explained, “I do not mind getting a B if that means more time to train and practice.”

Woinoski’s prompt answer left no doubt that opportunity costs are the bravest costs students take up. “Every athlete has to struggle between this tug of school and sports, and it’s definitely something we have to act upon with dedication,” he stated. As an engineering student, Woinoski stated that it would be very difficult to keep pushing himself if he didn’t love swimming as much as he does.

Fun Fact: What are your hobbies outside of swimming?

“I just sleep mostly, when I have the time.”

News Beat: Kinder Morgan Protest

0

On March 24th, A protest about the Kinder Morgan tank farm and pipeline was held at Gaglardi and Burnaby Mountain Parkway

Defeat of the far-right candidate in Dutch general elections

0

By: Manon Busseron

Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s party won the general elections held in the Netherlands on Wednesday, March 15. These elections were particularly important in the current European context, marked by the migratory crisis and the rise of far-right parties.

A measure of far-right movements’ popularity

Dutch citizens went to the polls to elect their new House of Representatives. 28 parties were competing for 150 seats. The voting process used is proportional representation, which means that if no party reaches a majority of 76 seats, the main parties will form a coalition and choose the candidate of the leading party to become Prime Minister.

This election was perceived as a way to measure the rise of far-right parties in the European Union. Indeed, the Freedom Party, led by Geert Wilders, was aiming to become leader in Parliament. His anti-immigration, anti-Islam, and anti-European opinions have echoed the discourses of Marine Le Pen (French leader of the National Front) and Frauke Petry (German leader of Alternative for Germany), when presidential and general elections are to be held in both countries.

The defeat of the far-right party

Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (centre-right) won 33 seats at Parliament, which means Rutte will probably remain in office after having formed a coalition with some other parties in the next weeks.

Although Wilders did not lead in the polls, he still reached second place with 20 seats, clearly behind the VVD, but winning 5 seats more compared to the last elections in 2012.

Christian Democratic Appeal (Christian-right) and Democrats 66 (centre-left) arrived in third place with 19 seats per party.

The other surprise of these elections was the rise of GroenLinks (green-left) led by the popular, “Dutch Trudeau“ Jesse Klaver, which won 16 seats — four times more than in the 2012 elections.

A victory against populism?

Many European countries welcomed the results with relief. German Chancellor Angela Merkel praised “a very pro-European result,” whereas European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker considered that Dutch voted for “free and tolerant societies in a prosperous Europe.”

However, Wilders’ defeat should be treated cautiously. First of all, every other party refused to form a coalition with him, which means that Wilders would have been isolated even if he had led the elections. His becoming Prime Minister would thus have been very unlikely without a coalition to support him —unless he had won the majority of 76 seats.

Secondly, even if he failed to reach first place, Wilders managed to impose the themes of Islam and immigration during the campaign, promising “fewer Moroccans” in the Netherlands, the closure of mosques, and the ban of Qur’an (which he compared to Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s autobiography). Dutch national identity was also a major theme in the campaign. Indeed, as a way to attract far-right voters, Prime Minister Rutte published an open letter to Dutch citizens, saying that those who “refuse to adapt and criticize our values” should “behave normally or go away.”

Nonetheless, these themes were overshadowed at the end of the campaign by the diplomatic crisis with Turkey. Indeed, Turkish ministers seeking the Turkish community’s support in the referendum about reinforcing presidential powers were denied entrance to the Netherlands and the meetings were cancelled. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reacted by calling Dutch governments “Nazis” and “fascists.” Prime Minister Rutte has remained firm and unwavering, which is likely to have worked in his favor for the elections.

Although Dutch electoral outcomes saw the defeat of the rising far-right party, populism is far from behind extinguished in Europe. The upcoming elections in France and Germany might not follow the same path.

With files from The Guardian, BBC, Le Monde, Reuters, and The Telegraph

Stuff We Don’t Like

0
(Elena Hsu / The Peak)

By: Vincent Justin Mitra

Stuff We Don’t Like: MacGyver (2016)

This modern reboot of an 80’s classic would make more sense as anything other than a MacGyver reboot. Starring Lucas Till and That Guy From CSI, the show adds into the mix a sexy hacker, for some reason, and gives MacGyver a roommate that fills all of the ‘black best friend’ stereotypes. Even the absurd “inventions,” a staple of classic MacGyver, are worse in the hands of this adaptation. A perfect example appears in one episode where, to evacuate civilians from a crowded hotel, Mac mixes some broom closet chemicals into a bucket before adding a wad of tinfoil to make some allegedly harmless smoke to set off the fire alarm. He could have also, y’know, pulled the fire alarm. In short, the new MacGyver reboot is, like his inventions, convoluted and unnecessary.

Stuff We Don’t Like: Powerless

This DC Comics comedy show has several recognizable faces. Abed from Community! The girl from High School Musical! The pilot from Firefly! Others! So it is surprising that the jokes are as obvious and predictable as a Disney Channel tween sitcom. It doesn’t have a laugh track, so that’s a plus, but that’s about it. The main character is perpetually cheerful, the co-worker is constantly abrasive, the boss is always incompetent; the clichés go on and on. Overall, Powerless has a super cast but civilian writing, and its biggest crime is that it is ‘sort of okay’ at best. And, in today’s world of blockbuster, five-star, spoil-the ending-and-our-friendship-is-over television, ‘okay’ is not a passing grade.

The Art of Having a Conversation About a Netflix Show You’ve Never Even Seen or Heard Of

0

We’ve all been there — faced with the question of, “Ohhh, have you seen [insert obscure name of show here]?” Yet you have not a fart-in-the-wind idea of what they’re talking about. But don’t worry, you have choices to escape the crossroad of feeling completely uncultured or just downright indifferent.


APPROACH 1
The Eager Beaver

This approach is for those good days when you’re feeling inquisitive, engaged, and patient. It usually begins, “No, I’ve never seen it, but what’s it about?” Then the dragon comes out of its cage. You could be in for a personal recital of a short novella about the show’s plot, character descriptions, and IMDB page of the director. . . but you asked. We’ll check back with you later.

 

APPROACH 2
Throw Me a Bone

You’re a nice person — but that doesn’t mean you want more than a simple drop of the show’s title and maybe a genre label. So you ask for a little help, something along the lines of, “No, I’ve never seen it. Is it similar to anything?” Well played, my friend. This way you can grasp onto something concrete that will actually help you remember to Google it later. . . or not.


APPROACH 3
The Judge Judy

You value your time. It was because of people like you that review websites were created and food critics exist — all time savers. If you wanted to waste your time trying new things that you potentially may or may not like, you’d be like everyone else . . . and you’re not into that. Your main interest in this mysterious series is  “How many seasons does it have?” “What else has the director worked on?” “Are the actors well-known?” You’re searching for a show to land you some serious cultural capital or bust.


APPROACH 4
The Polite Polly

You see their mouth moving, but you totally zoned out five minutes ago when they said the plot was “hard to explain.” You’re stuck. Questioning things further will only lead to them sending you funny GIFs from the show later and the expectation that you’re going to sink your teeth into all 48 seasons that night. Thankfully there’s an out! Tested and approved by a bitter research team of former BlockBuster employees comes the best response for when you have become oversaturated with information, “I’ll add it to my list of things to watch.” Just like that you’ve slipped blissfully out of the Netflix conversation and can piggyback onto [insert topic of your choice here].

 

APPROACH 5
The Game Over

This is when all the day’s energy has been spent and your inner demons collect to present your response as a greasy and blunt, “Nope.” The End.

 

 

SFU has been engaged so long that other schools start to worry

1

It has been five years since Simon Fraser University became the engaged university, and its friends are reportedly starting to fear that the wedding will never happen — the school will remain just a bridesmaid, never a bride.

Douglas College has gathered other friends for an intervention, and they want the university to commit to being more than just ‘engaged.’

“We saw the Facebook notification back in 2012, and we were so happy when Simon said they were engaged,” said Douglas College. “That was back when Kony was our biggest threat, when the whole world was going Gangnam Style.”

“But now, the school just turned 50 last year; they aren’t getting any younger. Are they gonna tie that knot?”

They aren’t the only ones who are concerned, and Capilano is suggesting there might be a bigger issue here.

“Whom are they even engaged to? We’ve all heard it, ‘Oh yeah, SFU is engaged, yes it’s totally real,’ but they’ve never once said whom they’re engaged to. Is it some kind of mysterious partner that lives in Finland? Did they just meet online and are gonna get married once they fly over here? Oh my god, is SFU getting catfished?” asked Cap.

Simon Fraser University has been reported to be ‘hostile’ and ‘oddly defensive’ when asked about their engagement.

“I don’t understand why people can’t take my word when I say something. I would obviously never lie for my own benefit!” exclaimed Simon Fraser University. “Maybe we just want to wait, the economy is in shambles. We’re just going to save up as much money as we can take from students. We’ll commit and take the next step when we know we’re more financially stable than we ever ethically would need to be.”

Douglas College might have an alternate angle, as rumours have been circulating that they have had feelings for Simon Fraser University for a long time, and want to act on it instead of SFU pretending to be engaged when they’re not.

“With the partnership that we see with how many of our students transfer to Simon, we just see so much of ourselves in them. We’ve been close for a while now, and that’s it. Should something happen, that would be nice, but it’s not like we want to be with them. Unless they want to be with us. Did they say something?” asked Douglas College, blushing.

“We know that on the outside, they look brutalist. But when you look deeper, you just see so much potential, you know? Sometimes, all you need is someone special to help you take that leap from turning potential into passion.”

At the time of publication, Douglas College was once again rebuffed by Simon Fraser University for dinner and a movie, with SFU saying they’re spending more time with whomever they are supposedly engaged to.

Artichoke Hearts

0