Go back

CLIVE takes People’s Choice Award at MIT contest

CLIVE (Coastal Impact Visualization Environment) is a project co-directed by an SFU professor. The project won the People’s Choice Award at a major MIT-sponsored contest that concluded in early October.

The contest, entitled ‘Communicating Coastal Risk and Resiliency,’ focused on identifying projects that facilitate the communication of climate change data to the public, while also providing a system from which real solutions can be identified.

CLIVE is the product of a cross-country collaboration between SFU’s Spatial Interface Research Lab (SIRL) and the University of Prince Edward Island’s (UPEI) Climate Research Lab. This technology combines sea level rise and coastal erosion predictions with complex spatial data from PEI, and runs this data through a 3D game engine.

Operating as a computer program, it is controlled with either a keyboard or a game controller. The user is able to navigate within a virtual representation of PEI and trigger visual projections of sea level rise and coastal erosion for a given year (ranging from 1968 to 2100) to see how the land is impacted.

“The dialogue it has stimulated is one of our greatest success stories. It has brought science, our best science, into the public realm,” said Nicholas Hedley, director of SIRL, and a SFU professor of geography. Hedley is one of the co-creators of CLIVE, and brought his extensive background in 3D geovisual analytics to the team.

Hedley continued, “People are no longer relying upon abstract names of government science projects, wondering what it means to them. CLIVE allows them to see what it means to them, what the implications will be.”

Although the program is focused on PEI — a region identified as particularly susceptible to sea level rise and the accompanying consequences — Hedley explained the broader applications available: “One of the greatest accomplishments with this is not just with what we’ve built, but having created a workflow that is scalable and can be applied anywhere.

“We’ve had interest from countries in Europe, the Caribbean, down in the States; some are small communities [. . .] but some are whole municipalities, cities, and a couple of international governments,” added Hedley.

Hedley spoke to the real world implications of the data offered by CLIVE: “It is about designing ways to deliver data to citizens and stakeholders of all kinds, giving people infomocracy — democratic access to spatial information.

“If we’re going to make decisions about big serious problems, whether they have to do with health, environment, quality of life, every taxpayer is entitled to the information on which decisions will be made.”

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Read Next

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...

Block title

“Not at all” represented: Unhoused residents respond to Hastings decampment report

Written by Hannah Fraser, News Editor In February, BC’s human rights commissioner Kasari Govender released a report on “the exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment.” This two-day decampment was significant in scale, with 94 tents removed and residents forcibly displaced. Despite the City and Vancouver Police Department (VPD) insisting that human rights and press freedom were not violated, the report concludes that “transparency was compromised” by these parties.  According to the report, the media exclusion zone imposed at the decampment was not in accordance with human rights standards, as it lacked legal authority and “requirements of necessity and proportionality.” While framed as a “safe work zone” intended to address safety concerns, the “impact on media was not adequately considered.” As well, Govender deemed the...