Go back

Hot Tubbin’ in New Orleans

The gang from Hot Tub Time Machine return to the big screen on February 20. . . for the most part, anyway. Stars Rob Corddry, Clark Duke, and Craig Robinson reprise their roles — as Lou, Jacob, and Nick respectively — while Adam Scott takes the place of John Cusack, playing Adam Yates Jr., the son of Cusack’s character. The four of them participated in a conference call and answered questions from various campus newspapers.

Perhaps in the most challenging role as the newcomer to the series, Scott noted that he tried to take certain things out of Cusack’s performance in the first film, saying, “I think that Adam’s character in the first movie has sort of a thirst for knowledge, and I think that Adam Jr. is looking for his dad, he wants to find his dad whom he’s never actually met. And so, I think they have a similar sort of adventurous [side]. And somewhat similar eyebrows,” added Scott jokingly. “And also made a lot less. The difference would be only monetarily.”

One of the other main differences between the two films is the filming location. The first movie was filmed locally here in Vancouver, as well as a city in the southeast corner of British Columbia called Fernie, while the second one was filmed in New Orleans.

Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures.
Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures.

“[The attitude on set] was the exact same which was really comforting and fun and made it an easy work environment,” commented Corddry. “The difference was we were in New Orleans. So, there were a few more parties, the first time was in Vancouver.”

“It was cold,” added Robinson.

“And it was cold,” responded Corddry. “This was New Orleans, the height of the summer. And so, you know, alcohol and heat.”

“Our trailers were not as good on this movie because the budget was short,” said Robinson.

One thing that remained the same was the willingness to let the actors run with improvisation. “[Director] Steve Pink allows us to play around, and he encourages it, everybody is pitching jokes to each other,” said Corddry. “So the first Hot Tub there was barely a script, it was like we would come and we would say, ‘OK, we’re doing the scene in the [ski lodge].’ And then we kind of improvised it. I mean there was a script but we really did a lot of heavy improv. This one was a little more solid, except we got to play around a lot.”

“Neither film had a written ending. Not a joke,” noted Robinson.

“All the great films have no ending,” chimed in Scott.

With the last question, one student reporter asked if there would be a third film — interesting given that, though the first one wasn’t a huge box office success, it fared well in DVD sales.

“I think the real answer is, if this makes money, yes. If it doesn’t, then no,” said Scott rather bluntly. Robinson was a bit more diplomatic, saying, “If you’re asking will we come back together and work together, you’re goddamn right.”

 

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Read Next

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...