Go back

Word on the Street: Rolling Stone Cover Controversy

Humour
EIC
EIC
Less than 1 min.
0
1037

5 out of 5 stars upset! The cover should be reserved for MUSICIANS ONLY, like Lil’ Wayne, Clay Aiken and Charles Manson! 

Stewart Simpson, Eclectic music fan

4 out of 5. Don’t get me wrong I’m a huge fan of independent artists like Dzhokhar, I just don’t think he’s earned this yet.

Lois Goldman, Would be fine with a Ted Kaczynski cover 

I hated it so . . . 1 out of 5? I don’t get how this works.

Peter Bryant, More of a thumb position guy

4 ½ out of 5! I’m going to show them my frustration by buying every copy I can find and burning them!

Brian Peters, Sticking it to the man

1 or 2 out of 5, I guess. I actually kind of liked it but the Boston Globe totally beat them to it . . . he was on their cover months ago!

Christopher Todd, Should be more outraged!

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

Opinions Peak Web -
By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Read Next

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

Opinions Peak Web -
By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

Opinions Peak Web -
By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Simon Fraser University’s independent student newspaper since 1965.

For advertising inquiries: [email protected]
For promotional inquiries: [email protected]

© The Peak Publications Society

Simon Fraser University’s independent student newspaper since 1965.

For advertising inquiries: [email protected]
For promotional inquiries: [email protected]

© The Peak Publications Society