Go back

It’s time to rethink our hockey obsession

Examining the culture behind Canada’s game

By:  Lucaiah Smith-Miodownik, News Writer

Multiculturalism and hockey are often portrayed as encapsulating the Canadian identity; however, the two don’t seem to intersect. This sentiment is shared in an article from the University of Toronto Press, written on sportscaster Harnarayan Singh, the first Sikh person to commentate an NHL game in English. He was also the first person to commentate in Punjabi. This is a reminder that Canada’s most celebrated sport doesn’t reflect its praised diversity. 

The NHL consistently ranks as the whitest professional sports league in North America, illustrating a stark contrast between the country’s supposed values and its beloved national game. This juxtaposition is not simply a standalone outlier, but rather a visible manifestation of the Canadian project itself. Growing up south of the border, Canada was always shrouded in an ethos of quiet pacifism, especially in comparison to the US as a whole. But what does it mean when so many NHL players are white, and when those who are not are subjected to racism

It might be easy to say that there’s nothing stopping minority players from reaching the highest level — while, at the same time, celebrating those who do as shining stories of success amongst a backdrop of Canadian liberalism and supposed inclusivity.

It’s clear, both from history and current events, that legal protections against discrimination don’t translate to equitable treatment.

The entrenched colonial institutions are designed to be more difficult to navigate by people of colour.

Despite this, racialized athletes have left their mark on the game. The Coloured Hockey League, founded in Nova Scotia in 1895, featured Black players who were innovators in the game — introducing techniques like the slapshot decades before they were popularized in the NHL. Despite their contributions, these players and the league were systematically erased from mainstream hockey narratives. In retellings of the game’s history, we see an apparent oversight that continues to shape the image of the game through the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and other racialized people from its focal portrayal. 

Hockey shapes its legends and lore around idealized violence as well. So much so that there is a historic player archetype, the enforcer or goon, whose role on the team revolves around fighting, often to the detriment of their own health. The NHL’s relative laxness on fighting compared to other professional leagues is evidently tied to the organization’s whiteness — the two cannot be separated. Beyond the world of sports, the culture on the ice illuminates a greater societal double standard — Black Canadians are dehumanized for simple existence, while pulls and punches pave the path to the Stanley Cup for many white players.    

Sports should be a place where we can express collective pride and individual identity. They provide an opportunity to recognize the uniqueness of a diverse nation united by emotional investment in the game. But in order to reach a point where that is truly the case, we need to invest in other aspects of life that enable players to flourish on the ice. This means investing in equity across society, and relentlessly pursuing racial justice. It also means tearing down the imagery, language, and ideals associated with Canadian hockey — of a hegemonic visual of white masculinity.

As long as the sport’s culture reinforces such imagery, veiled as a celebrated illustration of culture, we must reimagine our connection to it.

 

 

Was this article helpful?
0
0

Leave a Reply

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Read Next

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...

Block title

Less is more for future FIFA World Cup and the environment

By: Tomos Land, Staff Writer It has barely been a week since the 2026 FIFA World Cup final, yet the focus has already shifted to future iterations of the tournament. After enjoying a bountiful event, which is forecast to bring in record levels of revenue, FIFA — the sport’s world governing body — is reported to be considering plans to expand the number of nations taking part. More teams at future world cups means more matches, fans, and host cities. Each of these factors come with a higher cost to the environment. Governments need to step up and require FIFA to host the competition in a country that has better green infrastructure. By reverting to a single host nation, the governing body can meaningfully reduce...